Janet’s Lawyer Says She And Siblings Stand To Gain Nothing Financially, Want Only To Keep Executor’s Of Michael Jackson’s Estate From Harming His Mother And Kids Despite brother Jermaine’s recent defection , Janet Jackson and her sister Rebbie and brother Randy continue to contest the validity of their brother’s will and released a statement late Friday. A lawyer for Janet Jackson made a statement on her behalf, along with Randy and Rebbie Jackson regarding all the recent hoopla between them and their late brother Michael’s estate: Since the loss of Michael, Janet, Randy and Rebbie’s principal concern has been and continues to be for the safety and wellbeing of Michael’s children, their mother Katherine Jackson, and the entire family. Unfortunately, those people have been harmed by the actions of the executors of Michael’s estate — John Branca and John McClain, the estate’s lawyer Howard Weitzman, and those installed and paid to do their bidding. The negative media campaign generated by the executors and their agents has been relentless. In recent weeks, the media has received preposterous reports — all now proven to be false — of a purported kidnapping of Katherine Jackson and of physical and verbal abuse of a child. The executors and their agents also recently issued a notice barring Janet, Randy and Rebbie from visiting their 82 year old mother and Michael’s children. The effect of that notice not only is to damage fundamental family relationships, it is also to isolate Katherine Jackson from anyone questioning the validity of Michael’s will. The actions of the executors and those working for them can only be understood in ligh of the questions abotu the will raised by Janet, Randy, and Rebbie. The executors have never explained how Michael could have signed his will in California on a date that irrefutable evidence establishes he was in New York. It is important to stress that Janet, Randy and Rebbie have questioned the validity fo the will with no financial motive whatesoever — they stand to gain nothing financially by a finding tha the will is invalid. That point is worth repeating — they stand to gain nothing financially by a finding that the will is invalid. Michael’s children will be the beneficiaries of Michael’s estate. What will be gained by a finding of invalidity is that the executors will be replaced and the estate and the guardianship will be managed in a manner that is in the best interests of the children, which is what Michael wanted. The individuals who have the most to lose by a finding that the will is invalid are, of course, the executors and those on the executors’ payroll. Janet, Randy and Rebbie will continue to press forward in their search for the truth in order to carry out the wishes of their brother Michael. Does what they’re saying make sense to you? Or do you think Randy’s still just trying to pay his baby mama back? Sorry, we couldn’t resist. But really tho, this isht is sad. All we want is the best for Katherine and Michael’s kids. We hope a judge can get to the bottom of these allegations so this family can heal and move on after mourning the loss of their loved one.
Here is the original post:
Janet, Randy And Rebbie Speak: “We Stand To Gain Nothing Financially. Executors Of Michael’s Estate Are Harming Our Mother And Michael’s Kids”
