Tag Archives: america

The War on Terror is a Hoax

Due to the recent national outrage against the allegations of abuses by the agents of the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), it's time to remember what the so-called “War on Terror” really is. The War on Terror is a Hoax By Paul Craig Roberts According to US government propaganda, terrorist cells are spread throughout America, making it necessary for the government to spy on all Americans and violate most other constitutional protections. Among President Bush’s last words as he left office was the warning that America would soon be struck again by Muslim terrorists. If America were infected with terrorists, we would not need the government to tell us. We would know it from events. As there are no events, the US government substitutes warnings in order to keep alive the fear that causes the public to accept pointless wars, the infringement of civil liberty, national ID cards, and inconveniences and harassments when they fly. The most obvious indication that there are no terrorist cells is that not a single neocon has been assassinated. I do not approve of assassinations, and am ashamed of my country’s government for engaging in political assassination. The US and Israel have set a very bad example for al Qaeda to follow. The US deals with al Qaeda and Taliban by assassinating their leaders, and Israel deals with Hamas by assassinating its leaders. It is reasonable to assume that al Qaeda would deal with the instigators and leaders of America’s wars in the Middle East in the same way. Today every al Qaeda member is aware of the complicity of neoconservatives in the death and devastation inflicted on Muslims in Iraq, Afghanistan, Lebanon and Gaza. Moreover, neocons are highly visible and are soft targets compared to Hamas and Hezbollah leaders. Neocons have been identified in the media for years, and as everyone knows, multiple listings of their names are available online. Neocons do not have Secret Service protection. Dreadful to contemplate, but it would be child’s play for al Qaeda to assassinate any and every neocon. Yet, neocons move around freely, a good indication that the US does not have a terrorist problem. If, as neocons constantly allege, terrorists can smuggle nuclear weapons or dirty bombs into the US with which to wreak havoc upon our cities, terrorists can acquire weapons with which to assassinate any neocon or former government official. Yet, the neocons, who are the Americans most hated by Muslims, remain unscathed. The “war on terror” is a hoax that fronts for American control of oil pipelines, the profits of the military-security complex, the assault on civil liberty by fomenters of a police state, and Israel’s territorial expansion. added by: maasanova

Math, Science, And The Future Of Our Nation: A Global Online Town Hall Meeting

In partnership with Current TV, Time Warner Cable brings you “Math, Science and the Future of Our Nation,” a Global Online Town Hall hosted by Al Gore on November 17 at 12PM ET. This special event connects young people from around the world with America's leading minds in science and technology, inventor Dean Kamen, astronaut Sally Ride and Discovery Channel's “Mythbusters” Jamie Hyneman and Adam Savage. For information on how to watch this special event and participate in real time, visit www.connectamillionminds.com . added by: ConnectaMillionMinds

Sarah Palin Alaska TLC photo

Former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin and her son Trig are shown in a scene from her new TLC Channel reality series “Sarah Palin#39;s Alaska” in this publicity photo released to Reuters November 12, 2010. The eight-part show on cable channel TLC, which makes its TV debut on Sunday, portrays the Tea Party favorite, and arguably America#39;s most polarizing public figure, as a family-loving, outdoors woman who is as happy gutting salmon in the mud as addressing political rallies. TLC unveiled its hi

More:
Sarah Palin Alaska TLC photo

Doutzen Kroes Hot Photos

Doutzen Kroes got married over the weekend. What the hell? I didn#39;t even get an invite. What about that whole “still want to be friends” talk we had? From the New York Post: Doutzen Kroes and her boyfriend, producer/DJ Sunnery James, got hitched yesterday in a small, private ceremony in her Dutch hometown of Eastermar. The wedding took place in front of the pregnant model#39;s 30 closest friends and family members. The bride wore a dress by Spanish designer Pronovias, and the happy coupl

Go here to read the rest:
Doutzen Kroes Hot Photos

Which Tabloids Lie the Most? [Exclusive]

In the constantly-contradicting world of tabloid journalism, is anyone reliable? We analyzed 20 months of reported break-ups, marriages, and pregnancies to tabulate our first-ever Tabloid Reality Index , batting averages for America’s five major celebrity glossies and the rumors they monger. More

Segway Company Owner Plunges Off Cliff on….Segway.

Ooops! I hate it when that happens. added by: Progresshiv

Afghanistan War will cost at least another $60 billion, at least…

The war in Afghanistan may cost another $60 billion dollars and last ten more years, even if U.S. forces start leaving the country in 2011, potential Libertarian presidential candidate R. Lee Wrights said today. A NATO training-mission document recently uncovered by the Associated Press estimated it would cost about $6 billion dollars a year to train Afghani military and police forces. Gen. David Petraeus, the new commander in Afghanistan, has said that a successful counter-insurgency operation could last another ten years. “That means this war will cost at least another $60 billion to finish a job we never should have started,” said R. Lee Wrights. “No wonder our country is going broke.” Even with the training the NATO document acknowledges that Afghanistan will remain largely dependent on U.S. forces for security for years. The document also includes plans for large-scale infrastructure projects for “establishing enduring institutions” and “creating irreversible momentum” according to the AP. “The only 'irreversible momentum' we're creating is the irreversible momentum driving America deeper and deeper into debt,” Wrights said. “And the only 'enduring institutions' we're creating is the enduring institution of a welfare-warfare State that supports corrupt governments under the guise of fighting terrorism.” Wrights said he's troubled by comments Petraeus has made about the withdrawal of American troops, which is supposed to begin in July 2011. “He seems to be hedging his bets,” Wrights said. After nine years of war, Petraeus said that it is just now that the United States has the organization and people in place to fight a counter-insurgency operation. “The general is reputed to be an expert on this type of warfare and has said it can take years, even decades, to wage successfully,” Wrights says. “So if we are just getting started now, it could take ten more years to 'finish the job.' That's unacceptable.” Wrights is also troubled by the fact that the general refers to July 2011 as the date “when a process begins, the pace of which is determined by conditions on the ground.” Petraeus characterized the process as a “thinning out” of U.S. forces, rather than a “turning over” of security for their own country to Afghanistan’s citizens and authorities. “We have already endured one war where the generals and politicians kept telling us they were seeing the 'light at the end of the tunnel,' but that light never got any closer,” Wrights said. Petraeus recently spoke out against plans by a Florida minister to burn the Qur'an, saying that the action would put American troops in danger. “What is a greater danger to American soldiers, sailors, marines and airmen is keeping them in a war we should not have started in the first place, helping prop up a corrupt government,” Wrights said. “If we truly want to keep our troops safe, we should bring them home now.” Wrights is considering seeking the LP presidential nomination because he believes the Libertarian message in 2012 should be a loud, clear and unequivocal call to stop all war. He has pledged that 10 percent of all donations to his campaign will be spent for ballot access so that the stop all war message can be heard in all 50 states. Wrights, who was born in Winston-Salem, is a writer and political activist living in Texas. He is the co-founder and editor of the free speech online magazine Liberty For All. http://www.examiner.com/libertarian-in-raleigh/afghan-war-will-cost-another-60-b… added by: shanklinmike

Wildest Larry O’Donnell Tirades: 9/11 Was Bush’s Fault, Trashes Vietnam Vet as ‘Creepy Liar’

Prior to tonight’s debut of Lawrence O’Donnell’s new show, The Last Word, MSNBC has been running promos where O’Donnell proclaims how much “political pressure there is on everyone involved” in governing decisions and that it leaves him “respecting every one who steps into that room to do that,” adding he’s “gonna disagree with some of those people” but will always “respect the strength it takes to go on in there.” Well “respect” was the last thing O’Donnell displayed to a couple of guests that appeared with him on various MSNBC programs. Back on the February 12 edition of Morning Joe, he was such was in such a rage against former George W. Bush speechwriter Marc Thiessen, going as far as to blame that administration for the 9/11 attacks, host Joe Scarborough actually had to call the proverbial whistle on him and stop the program, to let him cool down. However, when they got back from a commercial break O’Donnell launched into yet another tirade as he called Thiessen a “torture-monger.” (video below the fold) Perhaps O’Donnell’s worst performance came on the October 22, 2004 edition of Scarborough Country when he want lashed out against Vietnam veteran John O’Neill of the Swiftboat Veterans for Truth for daring to challenge then presidential candidate John Kerry’s veracity, as he repeatedly called him a “liar” and charged he did nothing to stop the war. The following are transcripts of those unhinged attacks by O’Donnell: First up O’Donnell’s rants against Thiessen on the February 12, Morning Joe: O’DONNELL: You as a former speechwriter in the White House, you took an oath of office, when you took that job, that you might or might not remember. You actually published a book that says that the President of the United States, on its title, the President is inviting the next attack. Isn’t it true that the President you worked for invited the first attack, by having no idea what was going on with al Qaeda. You just admitted that when you were hit on 9/11, you just said, “We didn’t know who hit us.” You said, “We didn’t know who hit us.” You were told who was going to hit you before we were hit on 9/11. Your administration invited the first attack, for which you should live in shame! MARC THIESSEN: Lawrence, Lawrence, Lawrence. JOE SCARBOROUGH: Go! THIESSEN: Listen here’s the record. When the, when the, when the Obama administration approach, the law enforcement approach was first working the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. The bombing of the USS Cole, the bombing of our embassies in… O’DONNELL: Talk about the Bush presidency from the day he was sworn in! THIESSEN: …and, and, and the 9/11 attacks. (CROSSTALK) SCARBOROUGH CUTTING IN: We’re, we’re going to break right now! We’re, we’re going to break right now. We’ll be right back and I’ll be interviewing Marc by myself. We’ll be right back. … SCARBOROUGH COMING BACK FROM BREAK: So here we go. Lawrence you have 30 seconds and then Marc gets a response. Ready? Go! O’DONNELL: Marc I’m wondering about your own personal experience with torture. I know you grew up in the richest zip code in America, in the upper East Side. You went to the only boarding school in Connecticut that I know of that has a golf course as well as two skating rinks. THIESSEN: Oh my goodness…opposition research. O’DONNELL: And then you went to Vassar and of course like all the torture-mongers in the White House, the Cheney family included, you never served a day in the military. Never considered that. THIESSEN: What does that prove Lawrence? O’DONNELL: Well I’m wondering with that background what is it that gives you an expertise on torture? What makes you love it so much? Now to O’Donnell’s, October 22, 2004 Scarborough Country, rampage against Vietnam veteran John O’Neill for his part in the Swiftboat Veterans for Truth: PAT BUCHANAN: Al lright, let me ask you, Lawrence O’Donnell, I mean is this, clearly, Kerry has expressed anger about these ads. And he said later, “I should have answered them earlier in August, and we didn’t do it, and they clearly hurt.” But Max Cleland was very public. He went down to Crawford, Texas, to the ranch. Why has Kerry not only ignored the ads, but almost dropped all references? You know, at the convention, it was the convention, “John Kerry, reporting for duty.” Why has he dropped all of that now? Are they just trying to sweep that aside or what?  LAWRENCE O’DONNELL, MSNBC SR. POLITICAL ANALYST: Well, let’s get back to the truth. The fact of the matter is that John O’Neill on MSNBC had to face—debate an argument with Kerry’s bands of brothers people who served with him in Vietnam and knew him well, and plenty of the people who served on that boat with him have come on MSNBC and other networks and refuted much of what’s in that book. And then John O’Neill’s own sources, like Larry Thurlow, turned out to be nuts. He turned out to claim in John O’Neill’s book—and Pat Buchanan and I have both written nonfiction books, and we write them to a very high standard, not this O’Neill standard, where he never tells you in his book that Thurlow got a Bronze Star for the same thing that Kerry got a Bronze Star for, the same encounter with the enemy. And that citation says that there was enemy fire. And the guy, and this Thurlow, who received this Bronze Star, wants us to believe that 35 years had passed and he had never read the words on his own citation. It’s one of the many lies that the book advances. To me, the most interesting lie, John O’Neill, that I would submit to you that you should answer is, you make a lying claim that John Kerry’s anti-war activity prolonged the amount of time that prisoners of war were held in Vietnam. You know the truth is what got them out of Vietnam was ending the war. You know the truth is that John Kerry helped end that war sooner through the protests. And I’d like to ask you, John O’Neill, when you got back from Vietnam, what did you do to save a single life that you left behind in Vietnam? What did you do to get the American soldiers out of Vietnam?  (CROSSTALK) BUCHANAN: Hold it. Okay go ahead, John O’Neill. JOHN O’NEILL, AUTHOR, UNFIT FOR COMMAND: I’d like to respond. First of all, Larry, I don’t think there’s a thing you said that wasn’t a lie in everything you just said. To start off with, with respect to John Kerry, John Kerry’s anti-war activities didn’t get any POWs home. The Treaty of Paris got the POWs home.  (CROSSTALK) O’DONNELL: Ending the war, ending the war which you didn’t do a thing to do. You didn’t have the courage to lift a finger against it. (CROSSTALK) BUCHANAN: Look, he has got a right to respond. I was in the White House at the time. Nixon had brought half the troops home by the time Kerry made his protest. Go ahead, John O’Neill. O’NEILL: What actually happened, Kerry wanted to abandon ship and leave the POWs there.  We negotiated a treaty that brought them home. That’s why they’re all here. If Kerry had helped them out, they wouldn’t be in that photograph with us. Kerry’s a guy they’ll never forget. He wanted to leave them behind. (CROSSTALK) O’DONNELL: That’s a lie, John O’Neill. Keep lying. It’s all you do. BUCHANAN: Hold it, John O’Neill. How do you justify the—how do you justify the statement you just made that Kerry wanted to leave the POWs behind?  O’DONNELL: Lies. He doesn’t justify anything. BUCHANAN: Where did he do that?  O’NEILL: On the Dick Cavett show and elsewhere, John Kerry’s position was that we should accept the Madame Binh seven-point proposal, which called for unilateral withdrawal, setting a date after which at some future time, we’d negotiate the return of the POWs. So we would set a date. We would withdraw and then we would begin to discuss how to bring them home. That would have never worked. Our position was, you had to have a deal where the POWs came home. The POWs know that. This is like trying to claim—that’s why they’re all with us, because he would have let them rot in jails. (CROSSTALK) O’NEILL: With respect to the rest of what you said, Larry- (CROSSTALK) O’DONNELL: What did you do to get them out? What did you do to end the war? What did you do to get them out? What did you do to end the war? You didn’t lift a finger. O’NEILL: Oh, you’re wrong. You’re exactly wrong, Larry.  First of all, I spent 12 months there.  I wasn’t a fake who spent three months, like John Kerry. O’DONNELL: What did you do to end the war, not what you did to fight it? What did you do to end it?! … BUCHANAN: Tell me, tell me John, about—did not the citation Thurlow got say that they were taking fire? O’NEILL: It said under fire. That’s true. It was based upon Kerry’s own after-action report. O’DONNELL: That’s a lie. It’s another lie. That’s a lie. O’NEILL: Which said there had been 5,000 meters of fire.  O’DONNELL: Absolutely lie. (CROSSTALK) O’DONNELL: You lie in that book endlessly claiming that reports belonged to Kerry that don’t have his name on it, John O’Neill. You lie about documents endlessly. His name is not on the reports. You’re just lying about it.  (CROSSTALK) O’DONNELL: And you lied about Thurlow’s Bronze Star. You lied about it as long as you could until the New York Times found the wording of what was on the citation that you, as a lying writer, refused to put in your pack-of-lies book! (CROSSTALK) O’DONNELL: Disgusting, lying book! BUCHANAN:  John, let me ask you this. O’NEILL: And you, Larry, are a professional liar.  (CROSSTALK) O’DONNELL: You have no standards, John O’Neill, as an author. And you know it. It’s a pack of lies! You are unfit to publish!  (CROSSTALK) O’NEILL: There are 254 of us, Larry. It’s a little hard to call us all liars.  BUCHANAN: All right, John O’Neill, let me ask you a quick question. How do you know for certain that John Kerry wrote the after-action report that said the boats were under fire?  O’NEILL: It has been tracked down specifically in… O’DONNELL: Lie! (CROSSTALK) BUCHANAN: Oh, let him talk. (CROSSTALK) O’DONNELL: He just lies. He just spews out lies. (CROSSTALK) O’DONNELL: Point to his name on the report, you liar! Point to his name, you liar! These are military records. Point to a name! (CROSSTALK) O’NEILL: I will, if you’ll shut up, Larry. You can’t just scream everybody down. (CROSSTALK) O’DONNELL: There’s no name. You just spew lies!  (CROSSTALK) O’NEILL: -let everybody talk, isn’t- (CROSSTALK) BUCHANAN: Look, Lawrence, take it easy. You’ve made your point. We’re going to take a break. We’re going to give John O’Neill a chance to answer that when we come back. We’ll continue this discussion after the break. … BUCHANAN: Welcome back. We’re talking with the author of “Unfit For Command,” John O’Neill, and Lawrence O’Donnell is with me here in the studio Washington. We have an e-mail, Lawrence, that says: “Why is Mr. O’Donnell so angry? In fact, why are Democrats so angry?  If they don’t calm themselves down, they’re going to have a heart attack.” O’DONNELL: I just hate the lies of John O‘Neill.  (CROSSTALK)  O’DONNELL: I hate lies. BUCHANAN: I know. Now, you’ve argued that these are lies, but let me suggest… O’DONNELL: It’s not an argument. They’re proven lies. Every single journalistic look at this book has ripped it apart, left it in shreds. O’Neill is a liar. He’s been a liar for 35 years about this.  And he found other liars to… … O’NEILL: Can I say one thing? BUCHANAN: John O’Neill, go ahead, John. O’NEILL: Pat, Mr. O’Donnell has certainly shown he has a good pair of lungs. But to try and return a little bit to just basic information, you asked the question, how do we know the report was written by Kerry? The first way we know that is that the other four officers that day, all four of them, say Kerry wrote it. The second way we know it is the journalist Tom Lipscomb tracked the report to a Coast Guard cutter and proved that the only one on the cutter to write the report was John Kerry. Third, the report is compatible with John Kerry’s account, which as late as the Democratic Convention. O’DONNELL: What are the initials on the report? What are the initials on the report? What are the initials? (CROSSTALK) BUCHANAN: Let him finish, Lawrence. (CROSSTALK) O’DONNELL: Lies. O’NEILL: Mr. O’Donnell, this is what you all did to the POWs.  (CROSSTALK) O’DONNELL: Just tell me the initials, you liar, creepy liar. O’NEILL: You’re afraid of the American people getting the truth. That’s why you scream and you yell.

See the original post here:
Wildest Larry O’Donnell Tirades: 9/11 Was Bush’s Fault, Trashes Vietnam Vet as ‘Creepy Liar’

Bank Of America Debt Collectors Called Borrowers “F___ing N__ger” And “Punk” To Get Them To Pick Up The Phone

Bank of America has been busted using some seriously outrageous tactics to try to collect debts so small they’re barely worth the paper they’re written on. It wasn’t until ABC News ambushed BOFA CEO Brian Moynihan Michael-Moore style outside his office that the firm finally responded by firing its debt-collection firm. http://www.prisonplanet.com/bank-of-america-debt-collectors-called-borrowers-f__… added by: Dagum

Amanpour Rues Lack of Appreciation for Obama’s ‘Amazing’ Achievements, Then Slams ‘Bizarre’ & ‘Fringe Quality’ of GOP Candidates

Interviewing David Axelrod on Sunday’s This Week, Christiane Amanpour asked him to explain why “people don’t appreciate some of the amazing legislative agenda” that President Barack Obama has “accomplished,” then with Senator Mitch McConnell she denigrated Republican Senate candidates who are Tea Party favorites: “Are you not afraid that their somewhat, one would say, some might say bizarre statements, their sort of fringe quality might actually turn people off?” She also condescendingly demanded of McConnell: “What is Christine O’Donnell’s qualification for actually governing? What is Sharron Angle’s actual qualification for governing?” In a third segment, she cued up Jordan’s Queen Rania to confirm “Islamophobia” mars America: “You’ve seen the reaction and the fallout from the Islamic center, but it goes broader than that. Do you see a sort of a dangerous Islamophobia in the United States?” While she repeatedly pushed Axelrod about why Democrats were delaying a vote on extending the Bush tax cuts for “the middle class,” with McConnell she tried to discredit extending the tax rates for everyone, childishly describing how “there’s also this huge thing that the people of the United States are worried about, and that is the deficit, and keeping the tax cuts will add trillions to that.” Amanpour proceeded to recite a post ridiculing McConnell: And let me ask you this: According to Howard Gleckman at the Tax Policy Center, let’s see what he’s just written: “McConnell would have to abolish all the rest of the government to get to balance by 2020. Everything. No more national parks, no more NIH, no more highway construction. No more homeland security. Oh, and no more Congress.” In that very same post, Gleckman , a former Business Week correspondent, fretted: “I fear the rest of us will be saddled with the consequences of McConnell’s irresponsible pandering” to “the tea partiers breathing down his neck.” Amanpour also insisted Obama’s economic policies are a success: As you know, the recession was declared over. There’s no recession. And many will say that, you know, they stopped it from going into a Great Depression and that they inherited this awful situation… Excerpts from Sunday’s September 26 This Week on ABC, as collected by the MRC’s Brad Wilmouth: Amanpour to David Axelrod: But really, a lot of people, I mean, people from all over the world, frankly, say to me, here comes a President with a huge mandate, a huge reservoir of goodwill, huge promises to change, and, with all of that, his popularity is down. People don’t appreciate some of the amazing legislative agenda that he’s accomplished. Is this a failure of leadership? Has he allowed the opposition to define him? To Mitch McConnell: AMANPOUR: You heard what David Axelrod said about the Republican plan on extending all the Bush-era tax cuts, and that it would really, you know, put the country more in hock. Analysts say that it will cause, you know, add some four trillion or so to the national debt. Are you really going to do that? Or do you think there will be a compromise on extending the middle class tax cuts?   [McCONNELL] So do you not think, I mean, will you quote, unquote, “hold the middle class tax cut hostage” to all the tax cuts you want to extend? MITCH McCONNELL: Well, nothing is being held hostage to anything. It was the Democrats themselves who decided not to have this. AMANPOUR: Well, would you compromise on that? Even after- McCONNELL: I was the only one who offered a bill. There was never a bill in the Senate. And you know why? Thirty-one Democrats in the House, five Democrats in the Senate agreed with me that we ought not to raise taxes in the middle of a recession. What might happen down the road is not the subject today. The question is, do we want to raise taxes in the middle of a very, very tough economy? All the Republicans think that’s a bad idea, and a substantial number of the Democrats think the same thing. AMANPOUR: Right, but there’s also this huge thing that the people of the United States are worried about, and that is the deficit, and keeping the tax cuts will add trillions to that. And let me ask you this: According to Howard Gleckman at the Tax Policy Center, let’s see what he’s just written: “McConnell would have to abolish all the rest of the government to get to balance by 2020. Everything. No more national parks…no more NIH…. No more highway construction. No more homeland security. Oh, and no more Congress.” So where would you get the cuts? [MCCONNELL] But you’re still not saying where the big, big cuts would come from because some of the things you’re talking about at this point – I mean, it wouldn’t be Social Security or Medicare, Medicaid. It wouldn’t be the defense. [MCCONNELL] So all of this comes into the Pledge for America which was announced this week, a platform for future governing by the Republicans. Now, many people say that it’s simply more of the same. You’ve obviously heard a lot of that over the last couple of days as basically nothing new. And whether they’re left, right or center, people are complaining that, in fact, it doesn’t go far enough, particularly for the very enthusiastic Tea Party base that you have. So, for instance, Erick Erickson has written about this pledge, “It’s full of mom-tested, kid-approved pablum that will make certain hearts on the right sink in solidarity. But like a diet full of sugar, it will actually do nothing but keep making Washington fatter before we crash from the sugar high.” How are you going to, well, you’re laughing. [MCCONNELL] No, that’s all right, but I want to ask you, how will you satisfy the base which seems to be really an insurrection now, the Tea Party? Would you agree that they’re cascading into your space? [MCCONNELL] As you know, the recession was declared over. There’s no recession. And many will say that, you know, they stopped it from going into a Great Depression and that they inherited this awful situation, but let me ask you this: You say you want to go out and win in November. I want to play for you something that Tom Ross, the chairman of the Republican party in Delaware, said to me on this program right after Christine O’Donnell, the Tea Party candidate, won in that last primary in Delaware. [TOM ROSS] Right, so that’s Mike Castle who they thought would win that election come November. Now, basically he’s saying perhaps not. So how do you square that? I mean, do you think these Tea Party candidates will be good for you in November? [MCCONNELL] But, I mean, she definitely wasn’t your candidate. I mean, basically, one would say that the Republican- MCCONNELL: You picked out one Senate race. I just gave you 12 places where we have a chance of beating Democrats. AMANPOUR: No, no, no, there are many. Yeah, but there are many, even in your home state. And I want to ask you, actually, what are the qualifications, do these people have? For instance, what is Christine O’Donnell’s qualification for actually governing? What is Sharron Angle’s actual qualification for governing? Are you not afraid that they might be a turnoff, whether it’s at the- MCCONNELL: Am I afraid of having more Republicans in the Senate? Of course not. AMANPOUR: No, that wasn’t the question. The question is, are you not afraid that their somewhat, one would say, some might say bizarre statements, their sort of fringe quality might actually turn people off? I mean, for instance, what do you say about a Sharron Angle, who I know you just had a fundraiser for, who basically talks about enemies in Congress and talks and hints about, you know, armed rebellion to put them down. I mean, is that the kind of talk for a United States Senator? [McCONNELL] But you didn’t tell me what you think about those kinds of comments from people who want to be a, you know, a Senator. I mean, it’s kind of bizarre, don’t you agree? To Queen Rania: You mentioned how this extremist ideology is even coming to play in the United States. You’ve seen the reaction and the fallout from the Islamic center, but it goes broader than that. Do you see a sort of a dangerous Islamophobia in the United States? How do you assess what’s happening here?

Go here to see the original:
Amanpour Rues Lack of Appreciation for Obama’s ‘Amazing’ Achievements, Then Slams ‘Bizarre’ & ‘Fringe Quality’ of GOP Candidates