Tag Archives: article

America dances to the Palin beat !

Why does the Media constantly keep Sarah in the spotlight? Have you noticed maybe in your local paper, or the internet how almost everyday the Media is forcing us too keep Sarah relevant! I posted this article because not only does Comcast seem to cram article after article in it's internet homepage, but it also makes sure her picture is flattering! I'm mean come, you mean too tell Sarah never has a bad hair day? Yet on the other hand Comcast does a bang up job of creating articles and bad pictures of President Obama on a daily basis. The American people are constantly brain washed to except what the establishment considers their celebrity's, and even if you really think about it when a person is killed by police or is arrested, that individuals worst picture in his or hers life is what makes the front page. Please keep in mind how we are being played and read between the lines, you will be surprised how good it feels to think out of the box! added by: kennymotown

Lil Wayne Hit With Another Paternity Suit

Lil Wayne has four kids. That we know of. Of course four, at least three have different mothers. The mother of the second child has never been established. In any case, the ranks of Weezy’s brood may be growing yet again! A Louisiana woman claims he fathered her eight-year-old grandson and wants a DNA test. She’d have gotten it long ago had it not been for Hurricane Katrina. Really. T-Pain (left) has nothing to do with this article . Ever since the baby was born in 2002, the boy’s family “tried multiple times to get a paternity test ” from the troubled rapper, only to face unforeseen delays. Such as a massive natural disaster. The New Orleans court system moved at a snail’s pace anyway, but after Katrina, the case’s records were all destroyed. Proceedings were therefore delayed by a matter of years. Finally, this year, the court ordered Lil Wayne to submit to a DNA test. He was in jail at the time. Now that he’s been sprung , Wayne has until early-December to take it. Lightning (or hurricanes, more accurately) aren’t likely to strike twice, fortunately.

Read this article:
Lil Wayne Hit With Another Paternity Suit

The Bra that Protects You from a Biological Attack!

This is exciting, an inventor designed an Emergency Bra that can be used instantly to help people breathe better during emergencies. Inventor Dr. Elena Bodnar designed this bra which has a protective device … http://bit.ly/ceMGzm added by: itgrunts

Senator, Your days are numbered.

“Politicians are like diapers; they need to be changed often and for the same reason.” — Mark Twain http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/firetherulingclass#signForm In the time when our founding fathers drafted our Constitution, and created the U.S Government, they did not intend on government service to become a career. It is the purpose of this petition to be the voice of the people to limit the terms of Senators to two (12 years maximum), and Representatives to six terms (12 years maximum). (Reelections have stayed above 85% since 1965, and in 2008 are at 94%) – http://www.firetherulingclass.org/ruling.asp In March 21, 1947, the Twenty-second Amendment (Amendment XXII) was ratified, and so set limits to the office of The President…but none for anyone else. The last ratified Amendment in the constitution was in 1992, and dealt with issue of their pay raises. No such limits have been proposed, or ratified for the very people who write the laws which impact our daily lives. “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men.” -Lord Acton In a time when our nation seems so polarized by either left, or right; this one thing, I hope we all can agree upon. We do not need members in Congress or the House, who ignore the voice of the people, or who lend an ear to the highest bidder. We do not need Legislators who grow comfortable with their seat, and do all they can to latch on to it. We need leaders, representatives who heed our voice, and perform a service to the people of these United States. It is not a seat of power to be used to make oneself a fortune, but should be used to better the lives of all. I propose this be added as the 28th Amendment of the Constitution. (for the benefit of all) ” XXViii Section 1. No person shall be elected to the office of Senator more than twice, and no person who has held the office of Senator, or acted as Senator, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected Senator shall be elected to the office of Senator more than twice (two six-year terms). This article shall be retroactive when applied. Those who currently serve as Senator shall stay for the remainder of the term. Those who have served a prior, consecutive term, will not be eligible for reelection. Those who have served two or more prior consecutive terms will also be ineligible for reelection, upon ratification, and there after. Section 2. No person shall be elected to the office of Representative more than six terms (one term is for two years), and no person who has held the office of Representative, or acted as Representative, for more than eleven years of a term to which some other person was elected Representative shall be elected to the office of Representative more than six terms. This article shall be retroactive when applied. Those who currently serve as Representative shall stay for the remainder of there term. Those who have served a prior six consecutive terms, will not be eligible for reelection. ” Section 3. The terms and length of service for Senators and Representatives shall not be changed or abridged by the United States or by any State. Only a popular vote, won by no less than 85% of US Citizens shall over turn the limits. added by: mitekillem

World’s Largest Offshore Wind Farm Has Grand Opening Today

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/39324391/ns/us_news-environment/ Whopper of a wind farm opens off Britain World's largest offshore project has 100 turbines — so far Image: Wind turbines in Thames estuary Stefan Wermuth / Reuters Photo: A boat powering through the Thames estuary on Thursday provides perspective of just how big the wind turbines there are. msnbc.com staff and news service reports updated 9/23/2010 11:59:42 AM ET LONDON — The world's largest offshore wind farm had its grand opening Thursday — and its location on the estuary of the Thames River makes it a showcase for Britain's push to move beyond fossil fuels. So far, 100 wind turbines have been planted in waters up to 80 feet deep across the estuary in southern England. The idea is to produce enough electricity, 300 megawatts, to power the equivalent of 200,000 homes. Each turbine is nearly as tall as a 40-story building and the blades are at least 65 feet above the water for clearance with vessels. No turbine is closer than 1,600 feet to another and the entire “farm” covers an area of 22 square miles. Up to 341 turbines will be installed over the next four years. With Thursday's opening, which tops a 91-turbine farm off Denmark, Britain now has more offshore wind capacity than the rest of the world combined. “We are in a unique position to become a world leader in this industry,” British Energy and Climate Change Secretary Chris Huhne said in a statement before he attended the grand opening. “We are an island nation and I firmly believe we should be harnessing our wind, wave and tidal resources to the maximum.” Britain now gets three percent of its electricity from renewables but aims to get 15 percent by 2020. As part of that, the government this year awarded licenses to wind farm developers in a program that could deliver up to 32 gigawatts of generation capacity and require investment of more than $117 billion. Critics of the $1.4 billion wind farm include some nearby residents who object to the sight of the giant towers, some visible from shore. The farm starts about seven miles from shore. Environmental groups tend to back wind power as long as projects are not in areas of significant bird flight paths. The new wind farm met that standard. It's an “important stride forward,” said Craig Bennett of the British chapter of Friends of the Earth. But the group also wants Britain to guarantee funding of at least $3 billion a year for the recently created and government-funded Green Investment Bank, which aims to boost private-sector spending on low-carbon technology. “I know that there is still more to do to bring forward the large sums of investment we want to see in low-carbon energy in the U.K.,” Huhne said, “and we as government are committed to playing our part.” One embarrassment to the government is that only 20 percent of the investment in the new wind farm has gone to British firms. The farm is owned and operated by Swedish energy company Vattenfall, and the largest chunk of expenditure has been to Denmark's Vestas for the wind turbines. Global interest The promised vast expansion of Britain's offshore wind resources is proving to be a powerful lure for companies not normally associated with renewables but keen to generate eco-friendly and reliable sources of revenue. Engineers, consultants and oil rig makers around the world are setting up new divisions and partnerships in order to get a foothold in the market, which offers secure returns to those building and running the turbines. “It's attractive for a lot of companies that are looking for contracts,” said Ian Simm, chief executive of green fund firm Impax Asset Management, which has holdings in companies such as Vestas. “The fundamental point that makes it attractive is scale and government commitment, and the fact that industrial companies can learn the facts of success in one offshore environment and be able to transfer the majority, if not all, of those skills to other countries,” he said. However, clearer statements from the government on renewables incentives are still needed to support wind farm developers and really kick-start the market, according to Sarwjit Sambhi, managing director of power generation at Centrica, which has won the rights to develop up to 4.2 gigawatts of offshore windpower in the Irish Sea. “There is a general theme across this in that we haven't passed the tipping point yet where the industry is confident enough that there is a long-term pipeline of projects.” Britain's potential The Offshore Valuation Group, made up of government and industry organizations, estimates if Britain were to develop just 29 percent of its potential offshore resource, this could deliver 169 gigawatts of capacity by 2050 and turn Britain into a net exporter of electricity. This would involve installing 7.2 gigawatts a year — roughly equivalent to 1,000 7.5 megawatt turbines — with fixed offshore wind accounting for 5.4 gigawatts of the average annual build rate needed. The supply chain needed for this would have annual revenues of nearly $100 billion in 2050 and employ around 145,000 people directly, according to the Offshore Valuation report. As a result shipbuilders and companies that specialize in making oil rigs are also entering the wind market. SeaEnergy Executive Chairman Steve Remp, who has worked in the offshore oil and gas market for 30 years, expects the market for equipment vessels to take off at the beginning of 2012. “I foresee a sizeable industry evolving that calls on the engineering expertise in working offshore in deep water,” he said. Reuters and The Associated Press contributed to this report. added by: EthicalVegan

My Pledge To The GOP !

I found this article expressed my feelings quite well! added by: kennymotown

Newsweek to American Guys: We Can Learn Some Lessons from Europe on How to Be a Man

“To survive in a hostile world, guys need to embrace girly jobs and dirty diapers,” argued the Newsweek writers Andrew Romano and Tony Dokoupil in the subheadline of their September 20 article “Men’s Lib.” The writers set out to explain “[w]hy it’s time to reimagine masculinity at work and at home.” If American men want to be competitive in a global economy, they argued, they need to suck it up and get comfortable with the idea of working traditionally “girly jobs” and/or being stay at home dads: It’s possible to imagine protectionist trade and immigration policies boosting blue-collar employment at the margins. But the U.S. can’t stop globalization. If male morale—and the American economy—are ever going to recover, the truth is that the next generation of Homer Simpsons will have to stop searching for outsourced manufacturing jobs and start working toward teaching, nursing, or social-service positions instead. Fair enough. But Romano and Dokoupil also cast their gaze across the Atlantic, arguing America needs public policies that emulate European countries on paid parental leave, particularly paid paternal leave (emphasis mine): In 1995, Sweden passed a simple but revolutionary law: couples would lose one month of leave unless the father was the one who took it. A second use-it-or-lose-it month was added in 2002, and now more than 80 percent of Swedish fathers take four months off for the birth of a new child, up from 4 percent a decade ago. And a full 41 percent of companies now formally encourage fathers to go on parental leave, up from only 2 percent in 1993. Simply put, men are expected to work less and father more. By altering the roles of the Swedish father and the Swedish worker, Sweden’s paternity-leave legislation has, in turn, rewritten the rules for Swedish men (and, by extension, women). “Swedish dads of my generation and younger have been raised to feel competent at child-rearing,” writes Slate’s Nathan Hegedus, an American who experienced the system firsthand. “They simply expect to do it, just as their wives and partners expect it of them.” If a man refuses time at home with the kids, he faces questions from friends, family, and, yes, other guys. Policy changes produced personal changes—and then, slowly but surely, society changed as well. The implication is clear: American society must be engineered to catch up with the needs of a rapidly-changing global economy, and what better mechanism to make that progress than government. In fairness to Romano and Dokoupli, they do make a case for personal, spousal, and parental responsibility by American men at the close of their article: Ultimately, the New Macho boils down to a simple principle: in a changing world, men should do whatever it takes to contribute their fair share at home and at work, and schools, policymakers, and employers should do whatever they can to help them. After all, what’s more masculine: being a strong, silent, unemployed absentee father, or actually fulfilling your half of the bargain as a breadwinner and a dad? But the fact that this duo of  writers feel the need to preach this message is a window into the condescending view many liberal journalists take on the great unwashed masses who aren’t reading their pontifications.

Excerpt from:
Newsweek to American Guys: We Can Learn Some Lessons from Europe on How to Be a Man

Anatomy Of The Plot To Kill The Nation

Every once and a while I find an interesting article on rense's web site, and this one really intrigued me! Most of the stuff his news board carries is quite anti-semetic, but this article will help you tie a few strings together! added by: kennymotown

Current TV ==> CrowdSourced TV

Gore is creating a new TV station with the original vision of Current TV. Nobody told us. Refer to the date on the article as being April 2010 http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&art_aid=12703… Al Gore Wants To Democratize Television, Leaks 'Crowdsourced TV' by Joe Mandese, Wednesday, April 28, 2010 ======================================================= What if you could flip the mass media power of the TV industry funnel, making your viewers your producers, and then using communities to source, distribute and promote professionally curated content? Well, then you might have something that looked a little bit like user-generated video portal YouTube combined with a traditional television network. That appears to be what Current Media plans to introduce soon, Chairman Al Gore hinted at during the closing keynote Tuesday at MEDIA magazine's Outfront Conference in New York. “Soon we will unveil a new, related concept that we call Crowdsourced TV,” Gore disclosed during a speech that focused largely on the concept of a “sustainable advertising” marketplace, and what advertisers, agencies and the media could to do to help make it a reality. The industry needs to, Gore asserted, because, “the consumer is way ahead of us on this.” Gore was alluding to the fact that consumers have already embraced social media platforms and new, inexpensive, professional quality technologies that have made them as much a part of the conversation as any marketer or media conglomerate, and that the best option for the media industry is to embrace it. “I want to keep the anticipation, but we're very excited about it,” Gore said about Crowdsourced TV. While he declined to elaborate, he implied that it would be a new iteration of what Current Media already does with its online community and its cable and satellite delivered television network, Current TV, which reaches 60 million U.S. households, and also operates in a number of major markets around the world. In fact, Gore said he was leaving the Outfront conference to travel to Johannesburg, where he was going to open a Current TV network in South Africa today. Gore, a former Vice President of the United States, said he and his partner Joel Hyatt originally launched Current to “democratize” the business of media, giving consumers more of a say, and direct involvement, in the creation and distribution of content. And in some ways, Current was ahead of its time, paving the way for a user-generated revolution that was ultimately seized by YouTube, and fueled by legions of social network platforms that promote and distribute it. Gore, who is a senior advisor to YouTube owner Google, did not imply whether it might play a role in Crowdsourced TV, and he did not give a specific time frame for unveiling details of the plans. But Mark Rosenthal, the savvy, long-time MTV Networks president who was brought in last year as CEO of Current Media, has quietly been retooling the network and its Web site to leverage the best of both its fervent user/creator base, as well as his personal ties to Hollywood and professional TV and film producers. During his speech, Gore implied that the next iteration of Current TV would expand on its users' ability to create information and entertainment content, as well as advertising on behalf of marketers and brands. Current was one of the first networks to utilize consumer-generated advertising campaigns on behalf of marketers, and showed campaigns that were recently developed by its users to help introduce a new, biodegradable package design for Frito-Lay's Sun Chips. “What if we let them create content and the advertising,” Gore told a roomful of top advertisers, agency and TV industry executives attending the Outfront conference. “We're pretty excited about this. added by: tverdell

CBS’s Stahl to Jimmy Carter: ‘You Blame Teddy’ for Killing Universal Health Care?

Saturday’s The Early Show on CBS showed a preview clip of correspondent Lesley Stahl interviewing former President Jimmy Carter for 60 Minutes in which Carter blamed former Senator Ted Kennedy for derailing his universal health care plan in 1979. Stahl referred to former Senator Kennedy as “Teddy” as she asked Carter if he held Kennedy responsible. Stahl: “And you blame Teddy for the failure?” A clip of the interview can be found on the CBS News Web site. Below is a transcript of the segment, introduced by Whit Johnson, from the Saturday, September 18, The Early Show on CBS: WHIT JOHNSON: Former President Jimmy Carter says Americans could have had a national health care plan years ago had it not been for the late Senator Ted Kennedy. Mr. Carter spoke with 60 Minutes correspondent Leslie Stahl. FORMER PRESIDENT JIMMY CARTER: The fact is that we would have had comprehensive health care now had it not been for Ted Kennedy’s deliberately blocking the legislation that I proposed in 1978 or ’79. LESLEY STAHL: And you blame Teddy for the failure? CARTER: Exactly. STAHL: Health care, his issue. CARTER: Exactly. It was his fault. Ted Kennedy killed the bill. JOHNSON: There you have it. Catch Leslie Stahl’s entire 60 Minutes interview with former President Jimmy Carter tomorrow night at 7 Eastern right here on CBS.

Continued here:
CBS’s Stahl to Jimmy Carter: ‘You Blame Teddy’ for Killing Universal Health Care?