Tag Archives: article

Outside Texas, alarm over textbook changes – latimes.com

Interesting take on the Texas education board decision. When Texas' conservative-leaning Board of Education voted for new social studies standards this month, parents, teachers and lawmakers far beyond the Lone Star state — particularly the liberal ones — took notice. With the changes, Texas' curriculum is likely to de-emphasize the concept in U.S. history of separating church and state, and the influence of Thomas Jefferson on 18th century world history. It would also cast a positive light on conservatives, such as Phyllis Schlafly and the late Sen. Joseph McCarthy. Concerned observers have warned that those ideas could seep into textbooks throughout the country, because Texas is one of the nation's largest textbook buyers. In California last week, state Sen. Leland Yee (D-San Francisco) announced that he was working out the details of legislation that would inoculate California students from the Texas version of history. “While some Texas politicians may want to set their educational standards back 50 years, California should not be subject to their backward curriculum changes,” he said. But it is far from clear that non-Texans will be subjected to the proposed changes, once they are finalized, as expected, in May. Though none of the three major K-12 textbook publishers — Pearson Education Inc., Houghton Mifflin Harcourt and McGraw-Hill — would comment for this article, observers of the $8-billion industry offered differing views on the likelihood that Texas could wield such influence beyond its borders — in part because the textbook business, like American history itself, is a fluid affair influenced by commerce, culture, legislation and technology. Texas and California are not just the two largest textbook markets in the nation. They are also among 20 states that industry insiders refer to as “adoption” states, meaning that they choose which textbooks can be used statewide. The remaining states let local schools and districts essentially choose whatever books they want, as long as the students who read them meet state-mandated standards. Image: http://farm1.static.flickr.com/3/4948931_55adc85e36.jpg added by: CaptSutter

Congressional Budget Office releases its analysis of health care bill.

Comprehensive health care reform will cost the federal government $940 billion over a ten-year period, but will increase revenue and cut other costs by a greater amount, leading to a reduction of $130 billion in the federal deficit over the same period, according to an analysis by the Congressional Budget Office, a Democratic source tells HuffPost. It will cut the deficit by $1.2 trillion over the next ten years. The source said it also extends Medicare’s solvency by at least 9 years and reduces the rate of its growth by 1.4 percent, while closing the doughnut hole for seniors, meaning there will no longer be a gap in coverage of medication. The CBO also estimated it would extend coverage to 32 million additional people. The CBO score is the last piece House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) was waiting on before putting the puzzle together on the House floor. A contingent of Blue Dogs has been holding out support, insisting that the bill be fully paid for and not increase the deficit. The numbers give a major boost to Pelosi and her leadership team, which can now begin the whip count in earnest and can specifically point to the cost savings. (You can read more of this article on the Huffington Post .) Personally I am impressed that the bill does as much as it does.

Jessica Simpson Jokes: John Mayer ‘Gave Away My Game’

Simpson laughs with David Letterman about John Mayer’s remarks in Playboy, Tony Romo’s butt. By Jocelyn Vena Jessica Simpson Photo: Mark Davis/ Getty Images Jessica Simpson stopped by “Late Night With David Letterman” on Wednesday night and chatted a bit about her ex-beaus Tony Romo and John Mayer . And even when Letterman’s questions got a bit personal, Simpson laughed off the interrogation and even dished a bit about her relationships with the two superstars. “Tony is great, still a dear friend of mine,” she told Letterman when she stopped by to promote her new show “The Price of Beauty.” “My dad introduced us. I told you that we’re big Dallas Cowboys fans. I’m still a fan. I still look at his cute butt in the outfits … uniforms.” While she went on to describe Romo as “a fine breed,” she had a less positive review of her other ex, Mayer, who very famously revealed details about their sex life in Playboy. “Normally, you would think that somebody you care about would keep those intimate details to themselves, It was definitely compliment … in a way. But I don’t really want people to know that about me. It’s like, I’m the good girl, and then that happens. That’s the thing I am, but he gave away my game [details about her sex life]. So, does she still talk to any of her exes? “No I have not talked to him since. I will always care about him, but I was disappointed about the article,” she said about Mayer, adding, “I will always adore Tony. He’s going to be one of my friends for life.” Related Photos A Look Back: Jessica Simpson & Tony Romo A Look Back: John Mayer And Jessica Simpson Related Artists Jessica Simpson John Mayer

Read the original post:
Jessica Simpson Jokes: John Mayer ‘Gave Away My Game’

Meet Sarah Palin, Professional Celebrity

Since August 2008, Sarah Palin has been one of the most famous political figures in the country. Since August 2009, she’s been one of our most famous figures, period. By August 2010, she may be unrivaled in the fame department. Last week, we reported how the former Alaska governor was working on a TV series about her home state, pitched by none other than famed producer Mark Burnett. A day before that, her publishers at HarperCollins announced she was embarking on a second book , a follow-up to her blockbuster best-selling memoir, Going Rogue . The day before that , she was the marquee guest on The Tonight Show , upstaging the likes of Olympic champion Shaun White and American Idol star Adam Lambert . No small feat there. Sarah Palin speaking at some event recently . At least on the surface, she remains engaged in politics, praising the Tea Party movement, and somewhat involved in journalism … or whatever Fox News is. A joke she told on The Tonight Show said it all: “The truth is, though, I’m glad that I’m not vice president. I would not know what to do with all that free time.” Bam! Seriously, though. No one works harder at being a celebrity than Sarah Palin, whether she’s hitting an Oscar gift suite or trying to cash in on teen mom Bristol Palin . But toward what end? A 2012 presidential run? Tens of millions? A daily talk show? Oprah-like, single-name dominance of pop culture and soon the entire universe? Everyone wondering exactly that simply enhances her star power, as does the blurring of the worlds of politics, celebrity and the media, which extends beyond her. Continue reading this article here …

See the original post:
Meet Sarah Palin, Professional Celebrity

Mark Zuckerberg Will Personally Hack Your Facebook Account [Valleywag]

You have another reason to be worried about your privacy on Facebook. A new investigation reveals the company’s founder hacked into the personal profiles and email of both his personal rivals and journalists. The origins of Facebook have been in dispute since the very week a 19-year-old Mark Zuckerberg launched the site as a Harvard sophomore on February 4, 2004. Then called “thefacebook.com,” the site was an instant hit. Now, six years later, the site has become one of the biggest web sites in the world, visited by 400 million people a month. The controversy surrounding Facebook began quickly. A week after he launched the site in 2004, Mark was accused by three Harvard seniors of having stolen the idea from them. This allegation soon bloomed into a full-fledged lawsuit, as a competing company founded by the Harvard seniors sued Mark and Facebook for theft and fraud, starting a legal odyssey that continues to this day. The primary dispute centered around whether Mark had entered into an “agreement” with the Harvard seniors, Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss and a classmate named Divya Narendra, to develop a similar web site for them — and then, instead, stalled their project while taking their idea and building his own. The litigation never went particularly well for the Winklevosses. In 2007, Massachusetts Judge Douglas P. Woodlock called their allegations “tissue thin.” Referring to the agreement that Mark had allegedly breached, Woodlock also wrote, “Dorm room chit-chat does not make a contract.” A year later, the end finally seemed in sight: a judge ruled against Facebook’s move to dismiss the case. Shortly thereafter, the parties agreed to settle. But then, a twist. After Facebook announced the settlement, but before the settlement was finalized, lawyers for the Winklevosses suggested that the hard drive from Mark Zuckerberg’s computer at Harvard might contain evidence of Mark’s fraud. Specifically, they suggested that the hard drive included some damning instant messages and emails. The judge in the case refused to look at the hard drive and instead deferred to another judge who went on to approve the settlement. But, naturally, the possibility that the hard drive contained additional evidence set inquiring minds wondering what those emails and IMs revealed. Specifically, it set inquiring minds wondering again whether Mark had, in fact, stolen the Winklevoss’s idea, screwed them over, and then ridden off into the sunset with Facebook. Unfortunately, since the contents of Mark’s hard drive had not been made public, no one had the answers. But now we have some. Over the past two years, we have interviewed more than a dozen sources familiar with aspects of this story — including people involved in the founding year of the company. We have also reviewed what we believe to be some relevant IMs and emails from the period. Much of this information has never before been made public. None of it has been confirmed or authenticated by Mark or the company. Based on the information we obtained, we have what we believe is a more complete picture of how Facebook was founded. This account follows. And what does this more complete story reveal? We’ll offer our own conclusions at the end. But first, here’s the story: “We can talk about that after I get all the basic functionality up tomorrow night.” In the fall of 2003, Harvard seniors Cameron Winklevoss, Tyler Winklevoss, and Divya Narendra were on the lookout for a web developer who could bring to life an idea the three say Divya first had in 2002: a social network for Harvard students and alumni. The site was to be called HarvardConnections.com. The three had been paying Victor Gao, another Harvard student, to do coding for the site, but at the beginning of the fall term Victor begged off the project. Victor suggested his own replacement: Mark Zuckerberg, a Harvard sophomore from Dobbs Ferry, New York. Back then, Mark was known at Harvard as the sophomore who had built Facemash, a “Hot Or Not” clone for Harvard. Facemash had already made Mark a bit of a celebrity on campus, for two reasons. The first is that Mark got in trouble for creating it. The way the site worked was that it pulled photos of Harvard students off of Harvard’s Web sites. It rearranged these photos so that when people visited Facemash.com they would see pictures of two Harvard students and be asked to vote on which was more attractive. The site also maintained a list of Harvard students, ranked by attractiveness. On Harvard’s politically correct campus, this upset people, and Mark was soon hauled in front of Harvard’s disciplinary board for students. According to a November 19, 2003 Harvard Crimson article , he was charged with breaching security, violating copyrights, and violating individual privacy. Happily for Mark, the article reports that he wasn’t expelled. The second reason everyone at Harvard knew about Facemash and Mark Zuckerberg was that Facemash had been an instant hit. The same Harvard Crimson story reports that after two weeks, “the site had been visited by 450 people, who voted at least 22,000 times.” That means the average visitor voted 48 times. It was for this ability to build a wildly popular site that Victor Gao first recommended Mark to Cameron, Tyler, and Divya. Sold on Mark, the Harvard Connection trio reached out to him. Mark agreed to meet. They first met in the early evening on November 30 in the dining hall of Harvard College’s Kirkland House. Cameron, Tyler, and Divya brought up their idea for Harvard Connection, and described their plans to A) build the site for Harvard students only, by requiring new users to register with Harvard.edu email addresses, and B) expand Harvard Connection beyond Harvard to schools around the country. Mark reportedly showed enthusiastic interest in the project. Later that night, Mark wrote an email to the Winklevoss brothers and Divya: “I read over all the stuff you sent and it seems like it shouldn’t take too long to implement, so we can talk about that after I get all the basic functionality up tomorrow night.” The next day, on December 1, Mark sent another email to the HarvardConnections team. Part of it read, “I put together one of the two registration pages so I have everything working on my system now. I’ll keep you posted as I patch stuff up and it starts to become completely functional.” These two emails sounded like the words of someone who was eager to be a part of the team and working away on the project. A few days later, however, Mark’s emails to the HarvardConnection team started to change in tone. Specifically, they went from someone who seemed to be hard at work building the product to someone who was so busy with schoolwork that he had no time to do any coding at all. December 4: “Sorry I was unreachable tonight. I just got about three of your missed calls. I was working on a problem set.” December 10: “The week has been pretty busy thus far, so I haven’t gotten a chance to do much work on the site or even think about it really, so I think it’s probably best to postpone meeting until we have more to discuss. I’m also really busy tomorrow so I don’t think I’d be able to meet then anyway.” A week later: “Sorry I have not been reachable for the past few days. I’ve basically been in the lab the whole time working on a cs problem set which I”m still not finished with.” Finally, on January 8: Sorry it’s taken a while for me to get back to you. I’m completely swamped with work this week. I have three programming projects and a final paper due by Monday, as well as a couple of problem sets due Friday. I’ll be available to discuss the site again starting Tuesday. I”m still a little skeptical that we have enough functionality in the site to really draw the attention and gain the critical mass necessary to get a site like this to run…Anyhow, we’ll talk about it once I get everything else done. So what happened to change Mark’s tune about HarvardConnection? Was he so swamped with work that he was unable to finish the project? Or, as the HarvardConnection founders have alleged, was he stalling the development of HarvardConnection so that he could build a competing site and launch it first? Our investigation suggests the latter. As a part of the lawsuit against Facebook and Mark Zuckerberg, the above emails from Mark have been public for years. What has never been revealed publicly is what Mark was telling his friends, parents, and closest confidants at the same time. Let’s start with a December 7th (IM) exchange Mark Zuckerberg had with his Harvard classmate and Facebook cofounder, Eduardo Saverin. “They made a mistake haha. They asked me to make it for them.” Former PayPal CEO Peter Thiel gets a lot of credit for being the first investor in Facebook, because he led the first formal Facebook round in September of 2004 with a $500,000 investment at a $5 million valuation. But the real “first investor” claim to fame should actually belong to a Harvard classmate of Mark Zuckerberg’s named Eduardo Saverin. To picture Eduardo, what you need to know is that he was the kid at Harvard who would wear a suit to class. He liked to give people the impression that he was rich — and maybe somehow connected to the Brazilian mafia. At one point, in an IM exchange, Mark told a friend that Eduardo — “head of the investment society” — was rich because “apparently insider trading isn’t illegal in Brazil.” Eduardo Saverin wasn’t directly involved with Facebook for long: During the summer of 2004, when Mark moved to Palo Alto to work on Facebook full time, Eduardo took a high-paying internship at Lehman Brothers in New York. While Mark was still at Harvard, however, Eduardo appears to have bankrolled Facebook’s earliest capital expenses, thus becoming its initial investor. In January, however, Mark told a friend that “Eduardo is paying for my servers.” Eventually, Eduardo would agree to invest $15,000 in a company that would, in April 2004, be formed as Facebook LLC. For his money, Eduardo would get 30% of the company. Eduardo was also involved in Facebook’s earliest days, as a confidant of Mark Zuckerberg. In December, 2003, a week after Mark’s first meeting with the HarvardConnection team, when he was telling the Winklevosses that he was too busy with schoolwork to work on or even think about HarvardConnection.com, Mark was telling Eduardo a different story. On December 7, 2003, we believe Mark sent Eduardo the following IM: Check this site out: www.harvardconnection.com and then go to harvardconnection.com/datehome.php. Someone is already trying to make a dating site. But they made a mistake haha. They asked me to make it for them. So I’m like delaying it so it won’t be ready until after the facebook thing comes out. This IM suggests that, within a week of meeting with the Winklevosses for the first time, Mark had already decided to start his own, similar project—”the facebook thing.” It also suggests that he had developed a strategy for dealing with his would-be competition: Delay developing it. “I feel like the right thing to do is finish the facebook and wait until the last day before I’m supposed to have their thing ready and then be like look yours isn’t as good” A few weeks after the initial meeting with the HarvardConnection team, after Mark sent the IM to Eduardo Saverin talking about developing “the facebook thing” and delaying his development of HarvardConnection, Mark met with the HarvardConnection folks, Cameron, Tyler, and Divya, for a second time. This time, instead of meeting in the dining hall of Mark’s residential hall, Kirkland House, the four met in Mark’s dorm room. Divya is said to have arrived late. In Kirkland House, the dorm rooms aren’t laid out in cinder-block-cube style: Mark’s room had a narrow hallway connecting it to his neighbor’s. As Cameron and Tyler sat down on a couch in Mark’s room, Cameron spotted something in the hallway. On top of a bookshelf there was a white board. It was the kind Web developers and product managers everywhere use to map out their ideas. On it, Cameron read two words, “Harvard Connection.” He got up to go look at it. Immediately, Mark asked Cameron to stay out of the hallway. Eventually Divya arrived and the four of them talked about plans for Harvard Connection. One feature Mark brought up was designed to keep more popular and sought-after Harvard Connection users from being stalked and harassed by crowds of people. In this second meeting, Mark still appeared to be actively engaged in developing Harvard Connection. But he never showed the HarvardConnection folks any site prototypes or code. And they didn’t insist on seeing them. During the weeks in which Mark was juggling the two projects in tandem, he also had a series of IM exchanges with a friend named Adam D’Angelo (above). Adam and Mark went to boarding school together at Phillips Exeter Academy. There, the pair became friends and coding partners. Together they built a program called Synapse, a music player that supposedly learned the listener’s taste and then adapted to it. Then, in 2002 Mark went to Harvard and Adam went to Cal Tech. But the pair stayed in close touch, especially through AOL instant messenger. Eventually, Adam became Facebook’s CTO. Harvard Yard at WinterThrough the Harvard Connection-Facebook saga and its aftermath, Mark kept Adam apprised of his plans and thoughts. One purported IM exchange seems particularly relevant on the question of how Mark distinguished between the two projects—the “facebook thing” and “the dating site”—as well as how he was considering handling the latter: Zuck: So you know how I’m making that dating site Zuck: I wonder how similar that is to the Facebook thing Zuck: Because they’re probably going to be released around the same time Zuck: Unless I fuck the dating site people over and quit on them right before I told them I’d have it done. D’Angelo: haha Zuck: Like I don’t think people would sign up for the facebook thing if they knew it was for dating Zuck: and I think people are skeptical about joining dating things too. Zuck: But the guy doing the dating thing is going to promote it pretty well. Zuck: I wonder what the ideal solution is. Zuck: I think the Facebook thing by itself would draw many people, unless it were released at the same time as the dating thing. Zuck: In which case both things would cancel each other out and nothing would win. Any ideas? Like is there a good way to consolidate the two. D’Angelo: We could make it into a whole network like a friendster. haha. Stanford has something like that internally Zuck: Well I was thinking of doing that for the facebook. The only thing that’s different about theirs is that you like request dates with people or connections with the facebook you don’t do that via the system. D’Angelo: Yeah Zuck: I also hate the fact that I’m doing it for other people haha. Like I hate working under other people. I feel like the right thing to do is finish the facebook and wait until the last day before I’m supposed to have their thing ready and then be like “look yours isn’t as good as this so if you want to join mine you can…otherwise I can help you with yours later.” Or do you think that’s too dick? D’Angelo: I think you should just ditch them Zuck: The thing is they have a programmer who could finish their thing and they have money to pour into advertising and stuff. Oh wait I have money too. My friend who wants to sponsor this is head of the investment society. Apparently insider trading isn’t illegal in Brazil so he’s rich lol. D’Angelo: lol “I’m going to fuck them.” Eduardo Saverin and Adam D’Angelo were not the only people Mark discussed his Harvard Connection – Facebook situation with. We believe he also had many IM exchanges about it with relatives and a close female Harvard friend. In January 2004, Mark met with the Winklevoss brothers and Divya Narendra for what would be the last time. The meeting was on January 14, 2004, and it was held at the same place Mark met with the HarvardConnection team for the first time — in the dining hall of Mark’s residence, Kirkland House. By this point, Mark’s site, thefacebook.com, wasn’t complete, but he was working hard on it. He’d arranged for Eduardo Saverin to pay for his servers. He had already told Adam that “the right thing to do” was to not complete Harvard Connection and build TheFacebook.com instead. He had registered the domain name. He therefore had a choice to make: Tell Cameron, Tyler and Divya that he wanted out of their project, or string them along until he was ready to launch thefacebook.com. Mark sought advice on this decision from his confidants. One friend told him, in so many words, you know me. I don’t ever think anyone should do anything bad to anybody. Mark and this friend also had the following IM exchange about how Mark planned to resolve the competing projects: Friend: So have you decided what you’re going to do about the websites? Zuck: Yeah, I’m going to fuck them Zuck: Probably in the year Zuck: *ear And so, it appears, he did. (In a manner of speaking). On January 14, 2004, Mark Zuckerberg met with Cameron, Tyler, and Divya for the last time. During the meeting at Kirkland House, Mark expressed doubts about the viability of HarvardConnection.com. He said he was very busy with personal projects and school work and that he wouldn’t be able to work on the site for a while. He blamed others for the site’s delays. He did not say that he was working on his own project and that he was not planning to complete the HarvardConnection site. After the meeting, Mark had another IM exchange with the friend above. He told her, in effect, that he had wimped out. He hadn’t been able to break the news to Cameron and Tyler, in part, he said, because he was “intimidated” by them. He called them “poor bastards.” So then what happened? Three days earlier, on January 11, 2004, Mark had registered the domain THEFACEBOOK.COM. On February 4, he opened the site to Harvard students. On February 10, Cameron Winklevoss sent Mark a letter accusing him of breaching their agreement and stealing their idea. In late May, after going through two more developers, Cameron, Tyler and Divya launched HarvardConnection as ConnectU, a social network for 15 schools. On June 10, 2004, a commencement speaker mentioned the amazing popularity of Mark’s site, thefacebook.com. In the summer of 2004, Mark moved to Palo Alto to work on Facebook full time and soon received a $500,000 investment from Peter Thiel. In September 2004, HarvardConnection, now called ConnectU, sued Mark Zuckerberg and the now-incorporated “Facebook” for allegedly breaching their agreement and stealing their idea. In February 2008, Facebook and ConnectU agreed to settle the lawsuit. In June 2008, ConnectU appealed the settlement in California’s ninth district, accusing Facebook of trading its stock without disclosing material information. This appeal is on-going. The $65 million question When we described the specifics of this story to Facebook, the company had the following comment: “We’re not going to debate the disgruntled litigants and anonymous sources who seek to rewrite Facebook’s early history or embarrass Mark Zuckerberg with dated allegations. The unquestioned fact is that since leaving Harvard for Silicon Valley nearly six years ago, Mark has led Facebook’s growth from a college website to a global service playing an important role in the lives of over 400 million people.” On the latter point, we agree. What Mark Zuckerberg has accomplished with Facebook over the past six years has been nothing short of amazing. So, having revisited the founding of Facebook with additional information, what do we conclude? First, we have seen no evidence of any formal contract between Mark Zuckerberg and the Winklevosses in which Mark agreed to develop Harvard Connection. Second, any agreement the parties may have had—as well as most of the purported IMs and emails we have reviewed from the period—appear to have been at the level of, as Judge Ware described them, “dorm-room chit-chat.” (Albeit interesting and entertaining chit-chat.) Third, only a week after beginning development of Harvard Connection, which he referred to as “the dating site,” Mark had begun work on a separate project — “the facebook thing.” Mark appears to have considered the products as competing for the attention of the same users, but he also appears to have regarded them as different in some key ways. Fourth — and because of this foreseen competition — Mark does appear to have intentionally strung along the Harvard Connection folks with the goal of making his project, thefacebook.com, have a more successful launch. Bottom line, we haven’t seen anything that makes us think that, whatever Mark did to the Harvard Connection folks, it was worth more than the $65 million they received in the lawsuit settlement. In fact, this seems like a huge sum of money considering that the entire dispute took place over two months in 2004 and that, in the six years since, Mark has built Facebook into a massive global enterprise. That said, in the course of our investigation, we also uncovered two additional anecdotes about Mark’s behavior in Facebook’s early days that are more troubling. These episodes — an apparent hacking into the email accounts of Harvard Crimson editors using data obtained from Facebook logins, as well as a later hacking into ConnectU — are described in detail here. Related posts by Business Insider : • How Mark Zuckerberg Hacked The Harvard Crimson Using Data From TheFacebook.com • How Mark Zuckerberg Hacked Into Rival ConnectU In The Summer Of 2004 [ Image via deneyterrio’s Flickr ] Republished from www.businessinsider.com

Go here to read the rest:
Mark Zuckerberg Will Personally Hack Your Facebook Account [Valleywag]

Ethiopia famine aid ‘spent on weapons’

An investigation by the BBC reveals that some of the 1984 aid sent to help people suffering of famine in Ethiopia was spent on weapons by rebel groups. The information was found out when the channel interviewed former rebel leaders, “One rebel leader estimated $95m (

Jessica Simpson Didn’t Accept John Mayer’s Apology

‘I guess it could have been a lot worse,’ singer tells Oprah about Mayer’s ‘sexual napalm’ comment. By Jocelyn Vena Jessica Simpson and Oprah Winfrey on “The Oprah Winfrey Show” Photo: George Burns/Harpo Productions In an episode of “The Oprah Winfrey Show” set to air on Wednesday (March 3), Jessica Simpson opens up about ex-boyfriend John Mayer’s controversial comments about her in Playboy , where he described her as “sexual napalm” and other colorful terms. And, although he called her to apologize, she didn’t accept it. “I tried to read the article, and I was so disappointed in him,” she says on the show, according to UsMagazine.com . “It made me so sad, and it was really discouraging because that’s not the John that I knew. … I hope he gets his life together. He did apologize. I don’t accept it. It’s just one of those things that … I don’t resent him. I’m just going to let that go. That part of my life is over. “I’m not angry,” she continued. “I’m not angry. I’m — well, I’m a little bit angry … I’m a little bit angry. Um … well, I don’t want people to know how I am in bed. I guess it could have been a lot worse.” In the magazine, Mayer also discussed his relationship with Jennifer Aniston. “It would bother any woman, I would think,” she said of his comments. “I had to get to a place where I had to guard myself.” During the episode, Simpson, whose new reality show “The Price of Beauty” is set to debut March 15 on VH1, she also talks in depth about the criticism she received last year over her appearance and reported weight gain. “I fluctuate from [size] 4 to 6,” she explained. “I’m not going to ever be size 0, and I don’t want to weigh 90 pounds. … It’s a really hard thing for me to talk about because I celebrate women of all sizes. I think that we’re all beautiful.” Adding that she’s , she says that her once pin-thin frame came at a different time in her life. “I love my curves, she said. “I didn’t weigh 90 pounds,” she continued. “But I was — I was definitely smaller. But that was Daisy Duke, that’s a role. I was playing a role. I don’t want to look like Daisy Duke every day. I don’t want to wear a bathing suit every day.” Related Photos A Look Back: John Mayer And Jessica Simpson The Evolution Of: John Mayer Related Artists Jessica Simpson John Mayer

Follow this link:
Jessica Simpson Didn’t Accept John Mayer’s Apology

Some Career Advice for the Millennials [Millennials]

“It took me a year and a half to realize that I’m not just going to stumble into a great job,” the Brown ’07 grad told Newsweek . Did Career Services forget to tell you about the paradigm shift? Well, let me clarify—it’s like half paradigm shift and half millennial Ivy League naivete. Adrian Muniz, who is 25 years old, has spent the last three years working in “high-end retail stores” and doing internships; the article doesn’t say whether he’s managed to find a job yet. But considering he graduated when things weren’t yet terrible , and they are now, for college graduates wanting to get into traditional media, absolutely horrible , I would guess that he does not yet have a job. Usually when stories like this run, people like me who are older than 25 get to feel all smarmy, like didn’t this kid know what was happening, why did he think that just because he went to Brown that he was going to get a job right away, he’s got to learn sometime that life is hard, doesn’t he realize that it was never easy to get a paying job in media in New York, maybe he should have gone somewhere that gives out grades, etc. And it’s true, I am feeling all of those things! But I am also feeling like this paradigm shift of which I speak is real, and it means that whereas before it was difficult but not impossible to get an editorial assistant job at a fancy publication where they still have expense accounts and such, it is now difficult if not impossible, and in fact, probably increasingly undesirable. It means that this Muniz fellow should forget about the “media internships” and “high-end retail” jobs and do something else, where he will actually make some money and gain some life experience, and that does not include starting a Tumblr. Get out of New York, do something that no one else has done, and then we can talk. In fact, that is going to be my advice from now on for everyone in college who emails me about internships and jobs and advice: Don’t come to New York until you’re at least 26.

Original post:
Some Career Advice for the Millennials [Millennials]

Third Time’s The Charm: Latest NYT Paterson Bombshell Really Explodes [Bombshells]

Well! New York Times exposes on Gov. David Paterson are like Godfather movies: They come in threes. But unlike Copolla, The New York Times saved the best for last. Hypocrisy? violence against women? Abuse of power? It’s all here. Damn. Where to begin? How about with the brutal Halloween beating David W. Johnson , Paterson’s 6-foot-7 driver and closest confidant , allegedly gave an ex-girlfriend last year. From the Times article : According to the woman’s account, Mr. Johnson confronted her in their bedroom, choked her, tore her Halloween costume off, pushed her into the dresser and then continued to choke her with one hand. In her account, she screamed for Mr. Johnson to stop and then screamed for the help of a friend who was visiting. The woman said Mr. Johnson first took one telephone from her to prevent her from calling the police, and then chased her into another room when she went to find a second phone. Mr. Johnson then turned to the woman’s friend and told her to leave, “if you know what’s good for you,” according to the woman’s account. After this altercation, the woman says she was pressured by the State Police into not pressing charges. The State Police confirm contacting her. Oh, and not just any State Police: A member of the special detail which protects the governor—and David W. Johnson. The head of the state police told the Times “We never pressured her… we just gave her options.” Still, according to the Times the woman pressed forward with her charges against her high-profile ex. Until this February, when she got a call from Paterson himself. (Paterson claims the woman initiated the call.) She didn’t show up for her next hearing, and the case was dropped. What to make of this episode? The Times will not tell you, since they are a serious newspaper and print “just the facts.” But the article leaves exactly the right blanks to fill in with a clear case of Paterson using the State Police as his own private Statsi to make a violent problem go away for his sketchy best friend. The Times notes that the timing of Paterson’s call puts it right as the paper was digging into Johnson’s history of altercations with women for their earlier article. Hmm… And the article repeatedly points out that the State Police—Paterson’s police—visited the woman despite the assault being under NYPD’s jurisdiction. Hmmmmm…. Oh, and after the Times visited the woman’s house, Paterson got upset about it during a meeting with the editorial board. Uh huh… Whether it was intentional or not, we have to admire the way the three Times Paterson scoops build on each other to create the perfect Portrait of the Governor as a Real Asshole: In the first installment , we learn of Paterson’s girlfriend-beating trouble magnet aide, David W. Johnson. Maybe Paterson doesn’t have the best character judgment, we think with a shrug. The second article reveals that Paterson pays for his vacations with campaign cash and gives his friend’s ex-girlfriend a job. OK, so he has a little thing with using the power of his office to make things happen for himself and his buddies… uh oh. Then: Boom. Three articles full of interesting facts. Three is also the number of sides of a triangle. Let’s triangulate.

Go here to see the original:
Third Time’s The Charm: Latest NYT Paterson Bombshell Really Explodes [Bombshells]

Third Time’s The Charm: Latest NYT Patterson Bombshell Really Explodes [Bombshells]

Well! New York Times exposes on Gov. David Paterson are like Godfather movies: They come in threes. But unlike Copolla, The New York Times saved the best for last. Hypocrisy? violence against women? Abuse of power? It’s all here. Damn. Where to begin? How about with the brutal Halloween beating David W. Johnson , Paterson’s 6-foot-7 driver and closest confidant , allegedly gave an ex-girlfriend last year. From the Times article : According to the woman’s account, Mr. Johnson confronted her in their bedroom, choked her, tore her Halloween costume off, pushed her into the dresser and then continued to choke her with one hand. In her account, she screamed for Mr. Johnson to stop and then screamed for the help of a friend who was visiting. The woman said Mr. Johnson first took one telephone from her to prevent her from calling the police, and then chased her into another room when she went to find a second phone. Mr. Johnson then turned to the woman’s friend and told her to leave, “if you know what’s good for you,” according to the woman’s account. After this altercation, the woman says she was pressured by the State Police into not pressing charges. The State Police confirm contacting her. Oh, and not just any State Police: A member of the special detail which protects the governor—and David W. Johnson. The head of the state police told the Times “We never pressured her… we just gave her options.” Still, according to the Times the woman pressed forward with her charges against her high-profile ex. Until this February, when she got a call from Paterson himself. (Paterson claims the woman initiated the call.) She didn’t show up for her next hearing, and the case was dropped. What to make of this episode? The Times will not tell you, since they are a serious newspaper and print “just the facts.” But the article leaves exactly the right blanks to fill in with a clear case of Paterson using the State Police as his own private Statsi to make a violent problem go away for his sketchy best friend. For example, the Times notes the fact that the timing of Paterson’s call puts it right as the paper was preparing their earlier, less incriminating profile of Johnson and his past trouble with women and drugs. Hmmm… And the article repeatedly mentions that the State Police—Paterson’s police—visited the woman despite the assault being under NYPD’s jurisdiction. Hmmmmm…. Oh, and after the Times visited the woman’s house, Paterson got upset about it during a meeting with the editorial board. Uh huh… Whether it was intentional or not, we have to admire the way the three Times Paterson scoops build on each other to create the perfect Portrait of the Governor as a Real Asshole: In the first installment , we learn of Paterson’s girlfriend-beating trouble magnet aide, David W. Johnson. Maybe Paterson doesn’t have the best character judgment, we think with a shrug. The second article reveals that Paterson pays for his vacations with campaign cash and gives his friend’s ex-girlfriend a job. OK, so he has a little thing with using the power of his office to make things happen for himself and his buddies—paying for vacations with campaign cash and giving his friend’s ex-girlfriend a job in his administration. Small things, but still… Uh oh… Then: Boom. Three articles full of interesting facts. Three is also the number of sides of a triangle. Let’s triangulate.

View post:
Third Time’s The Charm: Latest NYT Patterson Bombshell Really Explodes [Bombshells]