Tag Archives: Associated Press

Who Can Ignore and Downplay Democrat’s Racist Statement? The Establishment Media Can

To refresh, as posted at NewsBusters and Eyeblast.tv , Pennsylvania Congressman Paul Kanjorski said the following on Wednesday while he was defending what Investors Business Daily has called “Financial Deform” : We’re giving relief to people that I deal with in my office every day now unfortunately. But because of the longevity of this recession, these are people — and they’re not minorities and they’re not defective and they’re not all the things you’d like to insinuate that these programs are about — these are average, good American people. This isn’t too tough to decipher, no matter how many House Democrats try to give him defensive cover — If the people Kanjorski “deal(s) with in my office everyday” are “average, good American people” because “they’re not minorities and they’re not defective,” then those who are minorities and “defective” in some way are not “average, good American people.” Kanjorski uttered an objectively racist (embodying “the belief that race accounts for differences in human character or ability and that a particular race is superior to others”) statement. According to this report , Kanjorski is not apologizing. Therefore, one must conclude that the congressman is comfortable with his objectively racist statement. So how is the press handling this? The mostly Democrat-defending establishment press that generally sets the narrative for radio and TV news mostly understands the aforementioned elementary exercise in logic. This explains why Kanjorski’s statement, while occasionally being framed with the usual “Republicans attack poor misunderstood Democrat” approach, is mostly getting ignored. A search at the Associated Press’s main web site on the Congressman’s last name comes up with one seemingly relevant item , an article headlined “McMahon: Wrestling was soap opera.” Yeah, you read that right. But the article is really a collection of four short items and two “Quick Hits.” AP writer Philip Elliott (or perhaps his editors) thought that Connecticut U.S. Senate candidate Linda McMahon’s description of her Word Wrestling Entertainment enterprise was more important than Kanjorski’s racist remark, the coverage of which came second. Naturally, Elliott’s item used the “Republicans attack” technique: Republicans criticized Rep. Paul Kanjorski for what they said were remarks suggesting minorities are not “average, good American people.” The 13-term Pennsylvania Democrat vigorously denied the charge, saying Republicans were taking his words out of context to score political points. … A Kanjorski spokeswoman said the congressman was defending people who get government help from those who unfairly criticize them. Sure he was. But in the process, he uttered an objectively racist remark. Alleged “context” is irrelevant. Well, at least the AP has covered it in its own quirky way. The New York Times hasn’t . The Washington Post restricted coverage of Kanjorski’s statement to its “44” blog , and has apparently kept the matter out of its print edition. Matt DeLong’s post is funny, in a reality-denying, sickening sort of way (bolds are mine): A Democratic congressman has found himself the target of conservative criticism after an inartful description of who will be helped by the financial reform bill currently working its way through Congress. The conservative website Human Events reported that Rep. Paul Kanjorski’s (D-Pa.) appeared to say during Wednesday’s financial reform conference committee meeting that the financial overhaul will help “average, good American people” — but not minorities or “the defective.” It’s amazing how often the word “inartful” — which isn’t even a recognized word in the dictionary ( here or here ) — has appeared since candidate Barack Obama and others frequently employed it in 2008 to defend him and others after verbal gaffes and worse utterances. As to DeLong’s use of “appeared” — Matt, stop insulting our intelligence. Finally, it’s also quite predictable to see DeLong tag Human Events (accurately) as “conservative,” while, as Tim Graham at NewsBusters noted earlier this week , magazines like Rolling Stone almost never get the “liberal” or “radical left” tag from the establishment press. Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com .

View original post here:
Who Can Ignore and Downplay Democrat’s Racist Statement? The Establishment Media Can

Media-Backed Obama Mortgage Program Flops

Obama’s home loan modification program was talked up by the bailout-friendly news media as a potential “ray of light” for struggling homeowners. But on June 21, Associated Press reported the mortgage assistance program is “falling flat.” The broadcast networks supported the mortgage modification and housing bailout when Obama launched it in 2009, after criticizing Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson’s plan for not doing “enough” to fix the problem. ABC, CBS and NBC haven’t mentioned the new figures since AP reported them. “More than a third of the 1.24 million borrowers who have enrolled in the $75 billion mortgage modification program have dropped out,” AP said. “That exceeds the number of people who have managed to have their loan payments reduced to help them keep their homes.” The ” ambitious ” Home Affordable Modification Program was supposed to help 3-4 million people. As of last month the number of dropouts (436,000) exceeded the permanent modifications by almost 100,000 (340,000). This was part of the same housing bailout Rick Santelli condemned on CNBC saying “the government is promoting bad behavior.” Santelli’s rant against the housing bailout helped inspire thousands of Americans to protest bailouts and runaway government spending at Tea Parties around the country in 2009 and 2010. But Santelli’s opposition to a bailout was an exception among the pro-bailout news media. As recently as Feb. 18, 2010 ABC’s Robin Roberts was praising the program as “what may be a ray of light for the millions of homeowners struggling to hold on to their piece of the American dream.” Roberts and Bianna Golodryga downplayed problems saying that there had been “hiccups” in the program, but placed the blame for those problems on banks unwilling to work with homeowners, rather than on the government. Golodryga’s report also included an expert who criticized the program from the left saying it was “nowhere near the size and scope of what we need to, to stem this tide.” Golodryga is engaged to White House budget director Peter Orszag , who announced his resignation June 22, 2010. ABC’s Jeffrey Kofman also found left-wing criticism of the program to incorporate in his story. On Feb. 18, 2009, Kofman mentioned concerns “that a $75 billion bailout can’t single handedly turn around an $11 trillion housing market. But they say it is a start.” Roughly a month later, CNBC’s Diana Olick acknowledged that the $75 billion program had “fallen short” of helping the 3-4 million homeowners on “Nightly News” March 26, 2010. At that time, she reported that only 200,000 permanent modifications had been done. But Olick didn’t criticize the Obama administration’s decision to expand the plan to more borrowers. In 2009, when Obama’s two-part mortgage bailout was launched, CBS had no criticism or difficult questions in its “Early Show” segment March 5. The night before, Katie Couric described the plan as “relief for struggling homeowners” on “Evening News.” Now it appears the bailout didn’t work and may jeopardize the economic recovery, according to CNBC’s Larry Kudlow. Kudlow reacted to the latest mortgage modifications data on June 22, saying that “Housing in particular looks vulnerable to that double-dip [recession]. And all these goofy, temporary tax credits and mortgage modifications and other forms of temporary stimulus nearly steal activity from the future and never work permanently, as Milton Friedman argued [years ago].” ‘Controversial’ Program Struggles, Despite Network Support Like other bailouts, the networks favored the mortgage bailout and loan modification program when it was announced in 2009. Now that the program is a failure don’t expect a retraction. So far the networks have ignored the new data Treasury released on June 21. Since the broadcast networks haven’t done much reporting on the problems with the loan modification program, people might wonder why it isn’t working. According to AP, “A major reason so many have fallen out of the program is the Obama administration initially pressured banks to sign up borrowers without insisting first on proof of their income. When banks later moved to collect the information, many troubled homeowners were disqualified or dropped out.” AP also warned that more foreclosures could be ahead as people leave the program. The Washington Post reported that about half of the program dropouts ” received another type of loan modification from their banks.” Only 7 percent have gone into foreclosure, according to CNNMoney.com. The timing of the news was bad for politicians trying to pass another housing bailout – this one $3 billion in loans for homeowners who are out of work. Politicians should be wary given the outrage already directed against mortgage bailouts, since it was the potential housing bailout that angered many and led to tea parties across the country. Santelli’s initial rant condemned the proposed housing bailout and touched a nerve with traders and America at large. “And in terms of modifications, I’ll tell you what, I have an idea. You know the new administration’s big on computers and technology,” Santelli declared . “How about this, (Mr.) President and new administration – Why don’t you put up a web site to have people vote on the Internet as a referendum to see if we really want to subsidize the losers’ mortgages, or would we like to, at least, buy cars and buy houses in foreclosure and give them to people who might have a chance to actually prosper down the road, and reward people that could carry the water, instead of drink(ing) the water.” After traders reacted with claps and cheers, CNBC’s Joe Kernen replied, “Rick, they’re like putty in your hands.” Santelli denied that and continued saying, “This is America! (turns around to address pit traders) How many of you people want to pay for your neighbors’ mortgage that has an extra bathroom and can’t pay their bills? Raise their hand. (traders boo; Santelli turns around to face CNBC camera) President Obama, are you listening?” Networks Back Mortgage Rescues, or Complain They’re Not Big Enough Obama’s mortgage bailout was praised by the many in network news media, after an earlier mortgage rescue designed by former Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson was attacked from the left by the broadcast networks because it wouldn’t help ” enough people .” “It sounds as if it doesn’t help anybody who had their mortgage rate increased or got foreclosed in 2007,” ABC “World News” anchor Charles Gibson complained on Dec. 5, 2007. “CBS Evening News” sympathized with a Texas couple who “can’t afford” to keep their large ranch home (complete with horses), supposedly because of the rate increases on their mortgage. CBS also ignored skepticism of a homeowner bailout on April 2, 2008, arguing that since the government had bailed out banks, mortgage holders should get the same assistance. “Now to the foreclosure crisis that has so many Americans worried about losing their homes,” “Evening News” anchor Katie Couric said that night. “After the government helped rescue Bear Stearns, calls grew louder for Washington to help struggling homeowners as well. Today on Capitol Hill, there was at least the promise of some assistance.” In July 2008, ABC’s Golodryga called “a sweeping housing bailout bill” “good news for potential homeowners.”   The networks also endorsed the $700 billion “rescue” package in 2008 that was voted down by 228 representatives including 132 “rebellious” conservatives and 94 Democrats. Rep. Mike Pence, R-Ind., was one of those who voted against it because “The decision to give the federal government the ability to nationalize almost every bad mortgage in America interrupts a basic truth of our free market economy.” The list of reporters and anchors who championed the first bailout that failed and ultimately the bill that passed on Oct. 3, was long and included CBS’s Anthony Mason, ABC’s Betsy Stark, Bianna Golodryga and Jake Tapper, NBC’s Tom Brokaw and CNBC’s Jim Cramer all called for the government to be the knight in shining armor with taxpayer dollars. Cramer was interviewed repeatedly on NBC and CNBC and even appeared on rival network ABC during “Nightline.” It wasn’t just housing bailouts. ABC, CBS and NBC also promoted the nearly $800 billion stimulus bill. They campaigned for the biggest spending bill in history , picking pro-stimulus speakers more often than opposing speakers and almost completely failed to ask how the enormous bill would be paid for.

Breaking: Federal Judge Blocks Obama Admin Moratorium (Brave NAE Experts Score a Win)

Via the Associated Press (link may be dynamic and subject to change):  A federal judge in New Orleans has blocked a six-month moratorium on new deepwater drilling projects that was imposed in response to the massive Gulf oil spill. The White House says President Barack Obama’s administration will appeal. Several companies that ferry people and supplies and provide other services to offshore drilling rigs had asked U.S. District Judge Martin Feldman in New Orleans to overturn the moratorium. This later paragraph from the breaking news report explains why I believe Ken Salazar’s dissenting experts may have influenced the judge’s outlook on the case: Feldman says in his ruling that the Interior Department failed to provide adequate reasoning for the moratorium. He says it seems to assume that because one rig failed, all companies and rigs doing deepwater drilling pose an imminent danger. Feldman’s take seems to mirror the language of the dissenters. Investors Business Daily editorialized on Salazar’s moratorium imposition travesty on June 10 : Experts brought together by the Obama administration to review offshore drilling safety were asked to review recommendations in the wake of the Deepwater Horizon disaster. They did not give their blessing to the six-month drilling moratorium announced by Interior Secretary Ken Salazar and have accused him of deliberately appending their report to make it seem like they did. According to the New Orleans Times Picayune, Salazar’s May 27 report to the president said the seven experts “peer reviewed” his recommendations, including a six-month ban on drilling in waters deeper than 500 feet. The experts say the report they reviewed suggested stopping only new drilling in waters deeper than 1,000 feet. The reviewers for Salazar’s report were provided by the National Academy of Engineering. Their joint letter says that while they agreed with the report’s various safety recommendations, “we do not agree with the six-month blanket moratorium on floating drilling. A moratorium was added after the final review and was never agreed to by the contributors.” One panelist, Bob Bea of the University of California, Berkeley, said in an e-mail: “Moratorium was not a part of the … report we consulted-advised-reviewed.” The academy’s Ken Arnold was less subtle, saying: “The secretary should be free to recommend whatever he thinks is correct, but he should not be free to use our names to justify his political decisions.” The panelists simply oppose the announced moratorium. “A blanket moratorium is not the answer,” the letter says. “It will not measurably reduce risk further, and it will have a lasting impact on the nation’s economy, which may be greater than that of the oil spill. We do not believe punishing the innocent is the right thing to do.” Neither do we, and frankly we’re tired of the deliberate manipulation of facts and truth in the name of protecting the environment … Even the Associated Press finally broke down and covered the dissenters’ outcries yesterday, while still somewhat concealing the full scope of their objections: The scientists, who had consulted with Salazar on a May 27 report on drilling safety, said the Interior Department falsely implied that they had agreed to a “blanket moratorium” that they actually opposed. The scientists said the drilling moratorium went too far and warned that it may have a lasting impact on the nation’s economy. A spokeswoman for Salazar said the May 27 report was not intended to imply that all experts from the National Academy of Engineering had agreed to the moratorium. “By listing the members of the NAE that peer-reviewed the 22 safety recommendations contained in the report, we didn’t mean to imply that they also agreed with the moratorium on deep-water drilling,” said spokeswoman Kendra Barkoff. Sure, Kendra. Though it’s only one step, it may very well be that thanks to the stink raised by the NAE experts and outlets like the Wall Street Journal, IBD, and many center-right blogs, the nation might start getting the energy sector of its economy back in gear. Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com.

See the original post:
Breaking: Federal Judge Blocks Obama Admin Moratorium (Brave NAE Experts Score a Win)

The Economy: Avoiding the ‘U-Word’ Doesn’t Mean It’s Not Still Happening

The establishment press is either getting tired of being beaten up over using the U-word (“unexpectedly,” or sometimes “unexpected”) to the point of excess when economic news disappoints, or has itself wearied of using the word. Here’s the Associated Press’s Martin Crutsinger on today’s retail sales report letdown, courtesy of the Commerce Department . The bolded sentence seen after the jump is Crutsinger’s substitute for the U-Word: Retail sales plunged in May by the largest amount in eight months as consumers slashed spending on everything from cars to clothing. The big drop raises new worries about the durability of the economic recovery. The Commerce Department says that spending fell 1.2 percent last month. Auto sales were down 1.7 percent but there was weakness in a number of areas. Excluding autos, sales fell 1.1 percent. The big decline cast new doubts about the strength of the economic recovery. Consumer spending accounts for 70 percent of total economic activity. … The 1.2 percent decline in May sales was the largest decline since sales had fallen 2.2 percent in September. Analysts had been forecasting sales would be weak but remain in positive territory. For May, the 1.7 percent drop in auto sales followed a 0.6 percent increase in April sales and was the poorest showing in this category since a 2.5 percent February decline. Expecting a slight positive and getting a large negative is what I would call a “big miss.” The auto sales drop may be suspect, because it’s not consistent with direct sales data from the car companies earlier this month . But there is a clue to how to reconcile the conflict in this statement at the link: “GM sales rose 17 percent, led by a jump in sales of its four remaining brands – Chevrolet, Buick, GMC, and Cadillac – and big orders from fleet customers, such as rental car agencies.” Fleet sales are not part of consumer spending. If those orders were big enough, it may really be that individual and families were buying fewer vehicles in May. That’s a big “uh-oh,” because fleet sales aren’t particularly profitable, and they may not be sustainable at current levels. That fleet sales and not direct consumer sales might be driving what growth there is in vehicle sales this year (especially, I believe, at government wards GM and Chrysler, and not so much at other companies) is consistent with my observation last week at this post about the “private investment – transportation equipment” sector’s outsized contribution to first-quarter GDP growth. Until “analysts” figure out how to incorporate FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt) into their estimates (admittedly difficult, but they get paid to estimate these things), you can expect that the “unexpected” will “unexpectedly” continue to occur — even if the press stops using the words. Cross-posted at BizzyBog.com .

See the article here:
The Economy: Avoiding the ‘U-Word’ Doesn’t Mean It’s Not Still Happening

Teen Unemployment: CNBC Reporter Gets Close With ‘Worst in 41 Years’ Tag

In an article published yesterday afternoon, CNBC news associate Joseph Pisani took note of something the rest of the media mostly hasn’t, or at least hasn’t highlighted: the terrible job market for teenagers. The headline and text indicate that this is the worst such market in 41 years. That’s true, based on the stat Pisani presented. But barring a near miracle in the next three months, in terms of the stat that matters most, the unemployment rate, it’s the worst ever. Give the CNBC reporter props for doing something almost no other journalist has done, which is to use the not seasonally adjusted (NSA) employment numbers as his factual source. As I have discussed several times, including here , the reported NSA numbers represent the government’s best estimate of what really happened in a given month, while the seasonally adjusted (SA) numbers published (and appropriately labeled) by the government and reported (but usually not labeled) by the press represent the result after smoothing out seasonal fluctuations. Pisani’s prose proceeds as follows: Teens Face Worst Summer Job Market in 41 Years The kickoff to the summer job season is not looking so hot for teens. Employment among 16-to 19-year olds in May grew by just 6,000, the smallest increase since 1969, when teen jobs fell by 14,000, according to government data analyzed by employment firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas. In May 2008 and 2009, teen employment grew by over 110,000. “It’s certainly a preliminary strong indication that it’s going to be a tough job market for teens,” said John Challenger, CEO of Challenger, Gray & Christmas. Jobs traditionally given to teens are apparently going to older workers who are willing to take low paying job to make ends meet. Employment among 20- to 24-year-olds grew by 270,000 in May, an unusual spike, considering that employment in the same age group fell by 261,000 in May 2009. “Also impacting the job market for young adults are the large number of older adults who are willing to accept even a temporary, seasonal position simply to generate some income,” said Steven Rothberg, chief executive officer of CollegeRecruiter.com, an online entry-level job-posting site. “We’re seeing experienced candidates taking jobs normally reserved for college grads and college grads taking jobs normally reserved for college students,” said Rothberg. As noted above, the -6,000 stat and the other monthly figures Pisani cited are from published NSA data (and ultimately from the government’s Bureau of Labor Statistics and not Challenger, Gray & Christmas, but I’m quibbling). That is the correct measurement framework to use. Look at the seasonally adjusted teenage unemployment rate in this graphic , however (using SA numbers is appropriate because the review is over a full-year period), one finds that the average teen unemployment rate in the past 12 months has been 25.95%. The linked graphic goes back to 1948, the earliest available year at the BLS for teen unemployment stats. No other 12-month period going back over 60 years has an average teen unemployment rate of more than 24%. Perhaps it’s too ambitious an endeavor for his assignment, but the CNBC journalist did not consider the possible impact of the crowding out of teens and other less-skilled workers by illegal immigrants. Another blind spot is his failure to deal with the effects of the artificially high federal minimum wage, as well minimum wages in several states that are even higher than Uncle Sam’s rate. But at least Pisani noticed the unprecedentedly awful situation, the kind of thing that I daresay would be causing a much bigger stir if a Republican or conservative were currently occupying the White House. A search at the Associated Press’s main site on “teen unemployment” (not in quotes) came back with one relevant result, a short item by the wire service’s Martin Crutsinger that is primarily a just-the-facts listing of key figures from the BLS’s Friday report. A Google News search on “teen unemployment (using quote) sorted by date returns only 53 items, and very few of them are from national outlets. Some of them tout government-sponsored teen “jobs programs” — sad indeed, given that government policy is primarily what has created the current situation. Cross-posted at .

Follow this link:
Teen Unemployment: CNBC Reporter Gets Close With ‘Worst in 41 Years’ Tag

CBS Corp. President and CEO Leslie Moonves Received More Than 200% Increase In Pay

Everyone dreams of an increase in their salary and a wishful thinking of having it increased by 200% . Well, CBS Corp. President and Chief Executive Leslie Moonves received a pay package valued at $43 million for the year 2009, more than twice his compensation a year earlier, according to Associated Press review of securities documents filed on Friday. The October born president and CEO saw his base salary remain unchanged at $3.5 million. But his bonus soared by $5.5 million from a year earlier and he received a huge $14.4 million in stock options in 2009 after getting none in 2008. The AP’s executive pay calculation, based on a regulatory filing, aims to isolate the value the company’s board placed on the CEO’s total compensation package. The figure includes salary, bonus, incentives, perks and the estimated value of stock options and awards. CBS Corp. President and CEO Leslie Moonves Received More Than 200% Increase In Pay is a post from: Daily World Buzz Continue reading

Watch V Season 1 Episode 8 We Can’t Win Online Stream

Watch your favorite Drama TV series “ V ” with its new episode entitles “ We Can’t Win ” that released April 20, 2010. It’s a best show that you gonna wish to watch all the time. Get it free through streaming online. Current show and replays are always available on the specified television online. To get access, visit and watch it here: V Season 1 Episode 8 We Can’t Win or Watch it HERE . Watch V Season 1 Episode 8 We Can’t Win Online Stream is a post from: Daily World Buzz Continue reading

Benjamin Netanyahu Pushes For Sanctions Against Iran

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu advocates for sanctions against Iran so as to prevent it from developing a nuclear weapons capability. He worries that the international community is not acting aggressively enough to prevent Tehran’s nuclear ambitions. There is a possibility that Iran could develop a nuclear weapons program which will become the biggest problem mankind will face in the future. However, the Israeli prime minister denied that their country imports petroleum from Iran. Unlike the leaders of Turkey and Brazil, Netanyahu strongly agrees with the U.S. President Barack Obama for sanctions to be implemented against Iran. There’s no room for giving them another chance and this is the best solution to prevent Iran in developing such harmful nuclear weapons. Benjamin Netanyahu Pushes For Sanctions Against Iran is a post from: Daily World Buzz Continue reading

Culture of Fear Inflames Financial News Wires

Bloomberg News staffers no longer have the market on fear and loathing cornered: Informants tell us that high-stakes monitoring of reporters’ performance has poisoned the atmosphere at Reuters and the Associated Press business desk, too. On Wednesday we reported on how Bloomberg’s neo-Soviet method of tracking scoop production, “Breaking News Points,” led to perverse outcomes like the obvious misrepresentation of some stories as exclusives and waning enthusiasm for enterprise journalism. On top of all that, we were told the system exacerbated a newsroom culture of paranoia and fear. Almost immediately, we began hearing from business journalists about similar problems at Reuters and AP Business. Our AP source says a majority of the staff — 90 percent, this person claims — are about to send a jointly-signed letter to Business Editor Hal Ritter accusing him of “installing a culture of fear.” Chief among their complaints: An annual review process “in which the entire staff is slammed.” Why would the news cooperative’s management want to demoralize staff like that? One theory is that the negative reviews would allow the newswire to cut more staff loose without having to pay severance. Then there’s Reuters, and its “Beats and Exclusives” scoop-tracking system — “the bastard twin to the one at Bloomberg,” as one source described it, in which the act of breaking news first is recorded via written “notes.” The “Beats and Exclusives” system wasn’t a very big deal until this year, when for the first time it will be used as the basis for pay, says our source, following an impasse in negotiations between Reuters and a union to which its journalists belong. Now “reporters who don’t file the requisite number of beats and exclusives will take it in the paycheck, so to speak.” It’s not clear how widely within the global Reuters newsgathering organization this change will spread, but our source indicated the new connection between pay and “Beats and Exclusives” notes is the reason New York Equities Editor Martin Howell this week implored staff to file fewer such records of scoops. You can read his internal memo here ; it was first printed by Talking Business News. Dig the part where he says Reuters reporters should write more about Reuters clients. The abuse we’re told is rampant under the Reuters “Beats and Exclusives” system should only get worse now that money is involved. Our source: The people who actually file [“Beats and Exclusives” notes] tend to shamelessly game the system by trying to get credit for non-news that no other outlet had or cared about or for “exclusive” executive interviews that broke zero ground. I can’t imagine what’s going to happen now, when jobs and pay are on the line. Of course, the fact that so much is on the line is, from a management standpoint, the precise reason for the system, as well as for the fearsome annual review at AP Business and for the Breaking News Points system at Bloomberg. The financial wires are being battered by several disasters at once: The implosion of financial services; the meltdown in the traditional news media; and a broad economic recession. This is the maelstrom that has AP lashing out at Google , that has seen Reuters spike a perfectly good investigation into one its investors and that led Bloomberg to kill a coverage expansion that was the pet project of its editor-in-chief. Executives are scared, and when executives get scared editors get scared. Said editors are now so frightened that they are positively racing, it would seem, to ape Bloomberg’s longstanding culture of near-psychotic paranoia — racing everywhere but at at Bloomberg, where they are scrambling to become even more Stalinist than they already were. The trouble with panic is that it actually makes a person (or, ahem, organization) less able to tackle challenging situations. Which helps explain why these scoop-measuring systems are now significantly inhibiting the very thing they’re supposed to be monitoring, by sapping time and energy from working journalists. Hence Howell’s memo to chill out with the scoop “notes,” and hence the plan we’ve been told Bloomberg has to tweak its Breaking News Points system again in 2010. Here’s a better idea for finance wire managers: Take the money earmarked for performance monitoring overhauls and rewarding Breaking Exclusive Scoop Beat Things and plow it into several dozen rounds of beers, and maybe some hot cocoa and rice krispy treats or whatever, spread out over the course of the year. Then when the time comes to let people go, as it probably will, do the sort of agonizing you knew deep down you’d have to do at layoff time even after you started pretending you could judge everyone using statistics. You’ll probably still feel terrible, but your (more) relaxed and brave reporters will have created an atmosphere where it’s much easier to hire people back when the rebound comes, and where it’s more likely you’ll still have lots of readers — err, clients — still paying for your content. Or just keep doing what you’re doing and hope (in vain) your staff doesn’t blow off steam by sending their horror stories and rants to tips@gawker.com . It’s cool either way, as far as we’re concerned. (Top pic by artemuestra on Flickr ; second pic by Max Sang )

Read the rest here:
Culture of Fear Inflames Financial News Wires

Showbiz News: Conan Pokes Fun at NBC During Monologue

Conan O’Brien ripped into NBC Tuesday night during his opening monologue for “The Tonight Show”. O’Brien says he’s rejecting NBC’s attempt to move “The Tonight Show” to a post-midnight slot to accommodate Jay Leno’s return to late-night

More here:
Showbiz News: Conan Pokes Fun at NBC During Monologue