Tag Archives: Breaking News

Kim Kardashian Bottom Measured

Kim Kardashian is set to debut as the next celebrity to be memorialized with a Madame Tussauds wax figure. Kim Kardashian took to her blog today to broadcast–with photographic proof, no less–that her famous curves were in the process of being measured. The reality star posted a photo on her blog of an mystery woman taking a ruler to her much-discussed behind, asking “Hmm… why would I be getting measured… Curiosity? Dress fitting? Can you guess?” The photo-friendly star left us with just one c

See more here:
Kim Kardashian Bottom Measured

Landon Donovan wife Bianca Kajlich picture

In fact, not only did the LA Galaxy midfielder Landon Donovan, 28, also blow Bianca Kajlich, 33, a kiss during a post-game interview, he spoke to her early Thursday morning in an emotional phone call. “It was nice,” he says about the conversation. Landon Donovan may not be single after all: Though the soccer star quietly split from Rules of Engagement actress Bianca Kajlich two years ago, the couple#39;s marriage isn#39;t completely over just yet. “We are not officially divorced,” Donovan, who

Go here to read the rest:
Landon Donovan wife Bianca Kajlich picture

Ashley Graham engaged

“He#39;s so amazing,” Ashley Graham, 22, tells us about her videographer fiancé, whom she met over a year ago at church. “We come from different backgrounds, but we have the same viewpoints on religion and family.” For her next look, Ashley Graham will be modeling a wedding dress! The size-16 model, whose s-exy lingerie commercials for Lane Bryant stirred up a bit of controversy earlier this year, is engaged to boyfriend Justin Ervin. When it came to picking out the ring, Ervin, 29, knew his

See the original post here:
Ashley Graham engaged

WaPo ‘On Gardening’ Feature Blasts Sarah Palin’s Wooden Fence

It seems no section of the newspaper is free of bias and/or political cheap shots. Take today’s Local Living section of the Washington Post, whose “on gardening” feature writer Adrian Higgins blasted “Sarah Palin’s… wrong to the landscape”* in the form of the 14-foot-tall wooden fence she erected between her Wasilla, Alaska, property and an adjacent lot rented by author Joe McGinniss: Do bad neighbors make bad fences? I’ve seen a few fences in my time, but none quite as defiantly ugly as the one now shielding Sarah Palin and her family from what she suggests are the prying eyes of her new neighbor , an author named Joe McGinniss.  As a prop in the theater of contemporary politics, the screen is a masterstroke. This billboard of a fence looks like the heroic, makeshift response of a woman protecting her besieged family from a loathsome spy. Writes Palin on her Facebook page: “Wonder what kind of material he’ll gather while overlooking Piper’s bedroom, my little garden, and the family’s swimming hole?” This, in turn, spawned ugly and threatening responses against McGinniss. “She’s pushed a button, and unleashed the hounds of hell,” McGinniss told NBC’s Matt Lauer. However genuine the motives behind the fence, from a design, horticultural and sheer aesthetic standpoint, it looks like a disaster. Higgins did eventually get back to his area of expertise, explaining why overly tall fences are bad for backyard gardens. And Higgins did crack a joke at the expense of D.C.-area local government bureaucrats who disapprove of tall fences. All the same, Higgins’s swipe at the Palins was gratuitous, a needless intrusion of politics into a generally apolitical section of the paper. *”Sarah Palin’s fence didn’t have to be so ugly,” was the online article’s headline. The above photo by Mark Thiessen of the Associated Press was included with the Higgins article along witha caption reading, “You betcha, a two-tone and 14-foot-high fence is a bad idea.”

More here:
WaPo ‘On Gardening’ Feature Blasts Sarah Palin’s Wooden Fence

Urgent Priorities and Common Sense in the Gulf

The ramifications of the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico have not even begun to surface. We will be dealing with the ecological damage for years as the prime nesting grounds for shrimp, oysters and countless other varieties of sea life are destroyed by the leak at the bottom of the ocean that nobody seems to be able to deal with. The economic damage is another entirely different animal that is going to rock the Gulf Coast and head inland with reverberations that will be seriously felt around the whole country. The Obama administration is completely lost on how to deal with the spill and the president seems helpless except to appoint commissions and place blame anywhere except 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. I know that an oil leak at this depth has never had to be dealt with before and is a seriously difficult thing to fix, but somewhere on this earth, somebody knows how to fix it and it’s high time to find him or her. The other part of the equation, the cleanup, is a horse of a different color and there are literally hundreds of ways to go about that, practical and simple methods that seem to either go over or under Obama’s head. I’ve seen demonstrations on television using things as mundane as the hay I feed my animals to clean up the oil. There are fabrics that have been developed that soak up the oil and reject the water and there is any number of machines people have come forward with, but none of them are appearing on the horrible scene on the Gulf Coast beaches. Why is Obama afraid to let common citizens test the methods they’ve come up with, what could it possibly hurt. Let’s just use a little cowboy logic in this situation. Bring all these people with ideas to the Gulf Coast, give them all a stretch of water to work with and see which ones work the best. That’s so simple and what can it hurt? Let the people try out their ideas. If they don’t work they can simply be disregarded without any harm to anybody. If they work the can be deployed en mass. I know the walls of the White House are covered with ivy league diplomas and Nobel Prizes, but there isn’t enough common sense in that bunch to change a spark plug. It’s time for the politicians to stop using this crisis for an excuse to raise our taxes and advance their confounded socialist agenda. It’s time for them to get out of the way and let the people with the practical ideas have a go at cleaning up this mess. And by the way President Obama, the moratorium on drilling in the Gulf is nothing less than pure dumb. You’re taking the last vestige of economic hope away from people who have no way left to make a living because no matter how much money British Petroleum ponies up, it’s going to run out way before those shrimp and oyster beds come back and long before the tourists start streaming back to the Gulf Coast. Stopping the drilling is nothing less than cheap political pandering and another sign of the total lack of experience in your administration. Just more proof of your lack of understanding and just how baffled you are by your job. You’re lost, Mr. President. Why don’t you admit it and look for some help among the great, unwashed masses. I think you’d find that we’re pretty dern good people who have been solving problems for generations. Maybe you can’t ‘plug the damn hole” but you can get out of the way and let some people with the common sense your administration lacks come in and do something right for a change. And believe me, it would really be a change.

Read this article:
Urgent Priorities and Common Sense in the Gulf

Why Can’t Media Acknowledge That Rolling Stone Is On the Radical Left?

One of the more annoying tics in the current bubble of national media coverage of Gen. Stanley McChrystal’s truly bizarre granting of access to Rolling Stone magazine was the utter lack of any description of the magazine — neither its ideology (hard-left) or its central focus (rock and pop music). Washington Post media reporter Howard Kurtz provided a little depth with an article on Thursday, which began: In the summer of 2008, Rolling Stone founder Jann Wenner ended an interview with Barack Obama — whose campaign he financially supported — by saying, “Good luck. We are following you daily with great hope and admiration.” So Kurtz pronounced it “surprising” when the magazine was “assailing Obama from the left.” But in fact, we pointed out in February 2008 that venomous Rolling Stone political writer Matt Taibbi was trashing both Obama and Hillary Clinton as “superficial, posturing conservatives.” So why couldn’t reporters acknowledge this was a left-wing, anti-war magazine? Wouldn’t that color how people saw a “Runaway General” controversy? Surely, if Gen. McChrystal had given this kind of interview to The Washington Times, the result might have been the same, but it’s very likely the word “conservative” would have been routinely attached, unlike in this case. Reporters also would have pondered if there was some sort of conservative agenda at work, which they didn’t seem to ponder in this case. (Does Rolling Stone want to win in Afghanistan? Or withdraw immediately?) Kurtz was also rare in noticing “the cover of the current issue is devoted not to ‘The Runaway General’ but to Lady Gaga, wielding a pair of automatic weapons attached to her bra.” But the media’s treating Rolling Stone like it was a prestigious academic journal on military policy, not the place where you see if Miley Cyrus drew three stars for her latest CD.  Kurtz mentioned Taibbi’s “angry, profanity-laced pieces follow in the footsteps of Hunter Thompson.” He didn’t reprise some of Taibbi’s more colorful conservative woman-trashing rants for the magazine, such as graphically describing Michelle Malkin “teabagging,” or calling Ann Coulter a “skanky b—h whore.” You would think the press might remember Taibbi’s infamous rants in the alternative New York Press, especially that one in 2003 where he wrote “The entire White House press corps should be herded into a cargo plane, flown to an altitude of 30,000 feet, and pushed out, kicking and screaming, over the North Atlantic.” Here’s more of Kurtz: Taibbi says he lost friends in the administration after a December piece headlined “Obama’s Big Sellout,” in which he questioned whether the president is “the vacillating, ineffectual servant of banking interests.” In March, just before the health care bill passed, Taibbi wrote that Obama “did everything wrong,” along with “his team of two-faced creeps like Rahm Emanuel. . . . willing to sell out every inch of the body politic to the pharmaceutical and insurance industries.” These were surely more surprising pieces for the magazine than Sean Wilentz’s 2006 cover story on George W. Bush, titled “The Worst President in History?” Conservative columnist Jonah Goldberg once wrote that “Rolling Stone has essentially become the house organ of the Democratic National Committee.” So it’s worth noting that the magazine — which Wenner says has a “mission” to promote “social justice” — is assailing Obama from the left. Wenner says he is “disappointed” by much of Obama’s White House record and “disturbed that some pattern is emerging. It’s naive to think you’re going to change American policy by compromising on a lot of stuff.” He says Interior Secretary Ken Salazar should have been fired over the BP debacle and that the administration’s financial regulation bill “gets weaker and weaker” over time. Wenner says he is still “rooting” for Obama but hasn’t been invited to the White House: “I’m not part of the gentleman’s club.”

See more here:
Why Can’t Media Acknowledge That Rolling Stone Is On the Radical Left?

CNN’s Carol Costello Hypes Up Greenpeace, Sierra Club, and Liberal Environmental Agenda

On the June 24 “American Morning,” CNN’s Carol Costello trumpeted a “revitalized” environmental movement that is hoping the Gulf oil spill will “change the way we feel about oil” and is aggressively lobbying Congress to pass radical climate change legislation. Previewing the “Gut Check” segment, Costello gleefully teased, “Coming up next, environmentalists are revitalized and it’s over the Gulf oil spill. Could this disaster be what we need in this country to change the way we feel about oil?” In lockstep with the Left’s environmental agenda, the fill-in anchor pondered whether the Gulf oil spill would crystallize support for a climate bill or would “it be back to business as usual?” Costello articulated the same phrase environmental groups frequently employ to manufacture a false sense of urgency around their liberal initiatives. Interviewing David Rauschkolb, founder of Hands Across the Sand, a liberal group opposed to offshore drilling, Costello praised the forerunner to Rauschkolb’s new group – Earth Day – for “strengthening the Clean Air Act and helping President Nixon create the Environmental Protection Agency.” Costello did not reach out to conservative critics who argue that draconian environmental regulations stymie economic growth and breed unemployment. Costello also claimed that the Sierra Club, a juggernaut in the environmental movement, capitalized on conservative criticism to generate public support for liberal causes. “When Rush Limbaugh blamed environmentalists for forcing onshore drilling offshore, the Sierra Club used Limbaugh’s comments to raise $120,000 and 110,000 signatures for climate legislation,” contended Costello, who failed to address the substance of the conservative talk show host’s argument. Further hyping the fringe environmental movement and its toxic agenda, Costello noted Clean Energy Works’s robust lobbying campaign for “clean energy legislation” and GreenPeace’s contest to design a new BP logo, without labeling either of these liberal organizations appropriately. Back in the studio, co-host John Roberts sensibly stated that America “can’t stop drilling because we’re not going to stop driving cars.” Channeling her inner liberal, Costello would not let her colleague’s simple logic deprive her of her wide-eyed optimism: “That’s true but will it drive something like climate change legislation? We just don’t know yet. That’s what environmentalists are hoping.” A full transcript of the segment can be found below: CNN American Morning 6/24/10 8:37 a.m. CAROL COSTELLO, co-host: Coming up next, environmentalists are revitalized and it’s over the Gulf oil spill. Could this disaster be what we need in this country to change the way we feel about oil? We’ll try to answer that question in a “Gut Check” coming up next. It’s 37 minutes past the hour. JOHN ROBERTS, co-host: 41 minutes after the hour. A growing number of environmentalists are hoping that the oil crisis in the Gulf will change how Americans treat the environment. We’ve seen that kind of quick reaction after disasters in the past. COSTELLO: I know, you know, Earth Day was born out of an oil disaster. So we wondered: will people really care? Will it change the way we feel about oil or will it be back to business as usual? A “Gut Check” for you this morning.              It’s called Hands Across the Sand. Back in February it drew 10,000 Floridians in protest of offshore drilling. This weekend, Hands says it goes international: 599 American cities will take part, as will 20 countries. DAVID RAUSCHKOLB, Hands Across the Sand: I believe this is a huge opportunity for us and it’s time we take control of our energy future. COSTELLO: David Rauschkolb hopes Hands will be the catalyst Earth Day was back in 1970. It was born after an oil spill in California and is credited for strengthening the Clean Air Act and helping President Nixon create the Environmental Protection Agency. The Clean Energy Works Campaign has hopes too – its launched an ad campaign pushing for clean energy legislation. GreenPeace is actively using the spill as a catalyst too, its members so intent to do something a contest to design a new BP logo has attracted half a million visitors to its Web site. The Sierra Club site is hot too. When Rush Limbaugh blamed environmentalists for forcing onshore drilling offshore… RUSH LIMBAUGH, conservative radio host: When do we ask the Sierra Club to pick up the tab for this leak? COSTELLO:…the Sierra Club used Limbaugh’s comments to raise $120,000 and 110,000 signatures for climate legislation. MICHAEL BRUNE, Sierra Club: This is our chance to actually move beyond oil and the outstanding question – the question that remains – is whether or not President Obama will seize this opportunity and get us off oil once and for all. COSTELLO: While all the passion sounds good for who critics would call “tree huggers,” is it real? Psychologist Jeff Gardere says while oiled birds, dirtied beaches, and black tides will raise awareness, it may not last. After all, there are government regulators already in place who are supposed to prevent disasters like this and didn’t. So why bother? Environmentalists get that but say this disaster will cut through the cynicism.                  BRUNE: We’ve set the ocean on fire, we’ve put thousands of fishermen and women out of work. The coastal tourism economy is collapsing and all of this is happening in slow motion. COSTELLO: It may be happening in slow motion, but Americans have a complicated relationship with oil, and nowhere is that better demonstrated than in Louisiana – they’re angry at BP but they sure don’t want the oil industry to go away. ROBERTS: You’re right, there’s so many people down there – one side of the family is in the fishing industry or the  tourism industry and the other side of the family is in the oil industry. They know that they have to co-exist. I mean, anything that raises awareness of the environment is a good thing, but you know, you’ve got to have – you can’t stop drilling because we’re not going to stop driving cars. COSTELLO: That’s true but will it drive something like climate change legislation? We just don’t know yet. That’s what environmentalists are hoping. –Alex Fitzsimmons is a News Analysis intern at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow him on Twitter.

Excerpt from:
CNN’s Carol Costello Hypes Up Greenpeace, Sierra Club, and Liberal Environmental Agenda

Ed Schultz Tries to Blame McChrystal, Appointed by Obama, on Bush

Far-left MSNBC ranter Ed Schultz just can’t let facts get in the way of his rank partisanship and liberal propagandizing. His latest whopper, that Gen. Stanley McChrystal was “another problem [President Obama] inherited from the Bush administration,” was blatantly untrue, and just earned him a ” pants on fire ” rating from Politifact.com. Politifact, which has busted up other untruths propagated by media liberals, noted a valuable lesson for liberals and Democrats: “not everything can be blamed on President Bush.” Indeed. Not only did President Obama not “inherit” McChrystal’s command from the previous administration, he “effectively sacked the general in charge to create a vacancy that he then proceeded to fill with McChrystal as his fix-it man,” notes Politifact. We applaud the folks at Politifact for checking Schultz’s inane rantings. Welcome to our world!

More here:
Ed Schultz Tries to Blame McChrystal, Appointed by Obama, on Bush

Media Ignore Ken Salazar’s Misleading Case for Drilling Moratorium

As Interior Secretary Ken Salazar prepares a new moratorium on offshore oil drilling after the last one was shot down by a federal judge Wednesday, lost on the media seems to be Salazar’s dishonesty in promoting the policy thus far. Very few have reported that he misrepresented the position of a team of experts designed to look into the costs and benefits of the moratorium. In reality, the seven-member panel, recommended by the National Academy of Engineering, said Salazar’s proposed moratorium would be ” punishing the innocent .” The policy “will not measurably reduce risk further,” the panel explained, “and it will have a lasting impact on the nation’s economy which may be greater than that of the oil spill.” Despite the panel’s clear opposition to the policy, Salazar implied that they supported the moratorium. Salazar was forced to apologize after the panel publicly rebuked the Secretary’s implications. “The Secretary should be free to recommend whatever he thinks is correct,” said one member of the panel, “but he should not be free to use our names to justify his political decisions.” Even the judge in the case, Martin Feldman, noted that Salazar’s statement was “misleading” and “factually incorrect.” Michelle Malkin took it one step further. “Salazar lied,” she claimed in her syndicated column on Wednesday. “Salazar committed fraud. Salazar sullied the reputations of the experts involved and abused his authority.” She reiterated this sentiment in a hard-hitting Hannity segment last night. But only a day after Salazar apologized for at the very least misrepresenting the panel’s views, he once again cited the panel’s support for the moratorium in arguments filed in federal court. DOI’s legal team wrote that the Department’s policies had been prepared with the benefit of consultations with experts from state and federal governments, academic institutions, and industry and advocacy organizations. As a result of that wide-ranging review, and the five-week discharge of hundreds of thousands of barrels of oil into the Gulf of Mexico that preceded it, the Secretary concluded that “offshore drilling of new deepwater wells poses an unacceptable threat of serious and irreparable harm to wildlife and the marine, coastal, and human environment…”…Consequently, Secretary Salazar ordered a brief six-month moratorium on one particular segment of oil-drilling on the Outer Continental Shelf that uses similar technology to that used on the Deepwater Horizon, in order to give industry and the agencies time to assess how best to address the findings and recommendations contained in the Safety Report. Now, that argument is technically correct. The only element of DOI’s proposed policies that the panel objected to was the moratorium. The panel made sure to note that “we broadly agree with the detailed recommendations in the report.” The moratorium was the only policy to which it strongly objected. But by noting that the recommendations as a whole were created after extensive consultation with the panel, and then touting the moratorium as the primary policy recommended, the legal team implied in hardly ambiguous terms that the panel had recommended the moratorium, which it obviously did not. The media so far have almost completely ignored Salazar’s continued use of dishonest and misleading statements in an effort to promote a moratorium. “In a sane world, Salazar’s head would roll,” Malkin wrote. “In Obama world, he gets immunity.” And in the world of the mainstream media, apparently, he is completely ignored.

Read this article:
Media Ignore Ken Salazar’s Misleading Case for Drilling Moratorium

Open Thread: An Oily Rebuke of Big Government

The Washington Examiner’s Mark Tapscott argues that ” Big Government is dying in the Gulf oil spill .” It’s not just millions of gallons of black gold spilling into the Gulf of Mexico that are being lost. Also disappearing into watery despair are the last shreds of credibility for progressive Big Government. It’s Day 65 of the Deepwater Horizon spill and the only hope of stopping the flow of thick, gooey crude remains the relief well being drilled by the private sector. None of the ass-kicking political speeches by President Obama, bureaucratic edicts by Interior Secretary Ken Salazar or EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson, or hypocritical posturing for the cameras in Congress has plugged the hole to stop the flow of suffocating oil headed to the beaches. We see this week a remarkable confluence of events signaling the eventual end of Big Government: The bureaucrats and politicians can spend trillions but they can’t plug the Gulf oil spill, agree on a budget in Congress or end the Great Recession’s foreclosures and unemployment. Is Tapscott reading too much into the spill, or will the spill be the straw that breaks the big government camel’s back?

Read the rest here:
Open Thread: An Oily Rebuke of Big Government