Tag Archives: chavez

Newsweek Wonders if Utah Republicans Will ‘Play Dirty’ by Voting for Leftist in Dem Primary

Liberals in the media frequently paint conservatives and Tea Party activists as pushing the GOP too far to the right to be electable in general elections. But the same complaint isn’t repeated on an endless loop when it comes to leftist activists challenging more centrist Democratic incumbents in primary contests. In fact, in some of those occasions, the media find a way to cast aspersions on Republicans. Take, for instance, a June 22 story on Newsweek.com, the headline for which posed the question, “Will Utah Republicans Play Dirty Today?” Writer McKay Coppins explained how one Republican state lawmaker had suggested that the party faithful in the state’s 2nd Congressional District should take advantage of the Democrats’ open primary system to cast votes for Claudia Wright, a liberal insurgent challenging Rep. Jim Matheson (D), rather than weighing in on the GOP primary contest. Although he noted that historically such tactical voting hasn’t been successful and that state Republican officials have officially “denounced the plan,” Coppins explained that the local media have become fixated on the notion and at least one radio host has described the crossover voting idea as “sleazy”: [F]or a while, it looked like a real possibility. An anonymously created Web site called “Conservatives for Claudia” has attracted thousands of page views, and Matheson himself has spent $800,000 this primary season to warn supporters that the party-crashing threat is real. And even though Republican officials (including, eventually, Wimmer) denounced the plan, it has continued to draw attention from the local press, with popular radio talk show host Doug Wright devoting significant air time to the idea. (He called it “sleazy.”) Republicans still might get their wish, though. A recent poll places Matheson 19 points ahead of Wright, but midterm primaries in Utah have historically garnered low turnouts, and early voting this year has been exceptionally unimpressive . With a passionate left-wing base, Wright could be poised for an upset in the primary – giving Republicans exactly what they hoped for.

View post:
Newsweek Wonders if Utah Republicans Will ‘Play Dirty’ by Voting for Leftist in Dem Primary

Revolutionary Rot, But News It’s Not: AP Ignores Venezuela’s ‘Battle for Food’

Late last year, a story carried by the wire service AFP reported on an announcement by Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez that his government would launch “a new chain of government-run, cut-rate retail stores that will sell everything from food to cars to clothing.” Chavez reportedly said that these “discount socialist stores” would show people “what a real market is all about, not those speculative, money-grubbing markets, but a market for the people.” This initiative was on top of Chavez’s creation of Mercal (link is to the Venezuelan home page, complete with “The Bolivarian Government of Venezuela” logo), a state-run network of grocery stores , seven years ago. How is this great leap forward into state control working out? A June 18 Reuters dispatch carried at CNBC reports that the government can’t even keep its food fresh. But that’s okay. The wire service takes a while to get there, and even then a bit of interpretation is necessary, but eventually we learn that the Chavez “solution” to that thorny problem is to seize replacement goods from private merchants: Hugo Chavez Spearheads Raids as Food Prices Skyrocket Mountains of rotting food found at a government warehouse, soaring prices and soldiers raiding wholesalers accused of hoarding: Food supply is the latest battle in President Hugo Chavez’s socialist revolution. Venezuelan army soldiers swept through the working class, pro-Chavez neighborhood of Catia in Caracas last week, seizing 120 tons of rice along with coffee and powdered milk that officials said was to be sold above regulated prices. “The battle for food is a matter of national security,” said a red-shirted official from the Food Ministry, resting his arm on a pallet laden with bags of coffee. It is also the latest issue to divide the Latin American country where Chavez has nationalized a wide swathe of the economy, he says to reverse years of exploitation of the poor. Chavez supporters are grateful for a network of cheap state-run supermarkets and they say the raids will slow massive inflation. Critics accuse him of steering the country toward a communist dictatorship and say he is destroying the private sector. They point to 80,000 tons of rotting food found in warehouses belonging to the government as evidence the state is a poor and corrupt administrator. Jose Guzman, an assistant manager at a store raided in Catia, watched with resignation as government agents pored over the company’s accounts and computers after the food ministry official and the television cameras left. “The government is pushing this type of establishment toward bankruptcy,” said Guzman, who linked the raid to the rotten food scandal. “Somehow they have to replace all the food that was lost, and this is the most expeditious way.” Brilliant. The Reuters report goes on to inform readers that “Food prices are up 41 percent in the last 12 months during a deep recession,” that Chavez has “revived threats to take over the country’s largest private food processor, miller and brewer, Polar,” and that “government now controls between 20 percent and 30 percent of the distribution of staple foods.” A search on “Venezuela” at the Associated Press’s main site indicates that though there are several stories on developments in that country, the wire service has not reported on this latest ratchet-up of the country’s ongoing socialist horror show. It would be unfair to contend that AP is ignoring Venezuela, but its headlines and/or its dispatches have displayed an annoying tendency to downplay the significance of what should be seen as scary developments. For example, a June 14 story with a misdirecting headline (“Venezuela takes control of another private bank”) would appear to be about government seizure of a financially troubled enterprise. The real story is that the the bank’s owner/former owner “just so happens” to be “a minority shareholder of Globovision, the country’s last TV channel that takes a stridently anti-government line.” A June 8 AP report on the country’s inflation casually notes that “The government has sought to confront inflation with a range of measures including recent seizures and shutdowns of businesses that authorities accuse of driving up prices.” Pray tell, what does seizing and shutting down businesses, thereby restricting supply, have to do with fighting inflation? The wire service also gives a virtual PR voice to Chavez statements that appear at first glance to be ploys designed to position his government as the virtue police. In a deceptively titled June 11 report (“Chavez targets alcohol, smoking in Venezuela”), AP reporter Jorge Rueda uncritically relays Chavez’s assertion that “the transition (to socialism) requires a moral crusade to change Venezuelans’ values.” Readers have to get to Rueda’s final paragraphs before they understand what this appeal to virtue is really all about : Chavez has also recently used the issue in his criticisms of the country’s largest food producer, Empresas Polar, which sells the country’s leading brand of beer, Polar. Chavez has ordered the expropriation of some of Polar’s warehouses, and has warned he could decide to take over more of the company. If the government did take over the Polar brewery, it would be shut down, Chavez has warned. Addressing Polar’s president, Lorenzo Mendoza, during Thursday’s speech, Chavez said: “I don’t know what you’re going to do … with your little Polar.” He used the term “Polarcita,” which Venezuelans often use for the small beer bottles that are popular in the country. Here’s an idea: If CNN, which yesterday declared its independence and fired the Associated Press , wants to make a mark with its own wire service efforts, it might want to consider dispatching correspondents to Venezuela to catch the world up on the slow-motion horror there that the AP and broadcast TV networks have either ignored or downplayed for years. Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com .

Excerpt from:
Revolutionary Rot, But News It’s Not: AP Ignores Venezuela’s ‘Battle for Food’

Open Letter To Sean Penn From Maria Conchita Alonso

paracuriosos The following is an open letter addressed to actor Sean Penn, written by Maria Conchita Alonso who is an outspoken critic of the elected Venezuelan leader Hugo Chávez.  This is in response to Penn’s appearance in HBO’s “Real Time with Bill Maher” Dear Sean, WHY? Even though I have great respect for your artistic talent, I was appalled by a recent television interview where you vigorously showed support for the regime of Hugo Chavez. Therefore, I’ve decided to set the record straight for you regarding the Chavez regime, supporting my case based not only on my political ideologies, but on proven facts you choose to ignore. Otherwise, I believe your position would be different. Being born in Cuba, a country where freedom of speech is non-existent, it’s startling to observe how Venezuela, where I was happily raised, is fast becoming Cuba’s mirror image: Dismantling of fundamental democratic rights deserved by its people and citizens of the world. For example, you said that all Chavez-winning elections in Venezuela were “transparent.” Then WHY didn’t the government allow a manual recount of the votes and computer information when doubt set in? After all, how do you explain how these votes that were strongly favoring the opposition mysteriously reflected the opposite results the morning after, thus permitting Chavez to continue on? On what are you basing your conclusions? I strongly recommend that you read a report by the U.S. State Department written in 2009 entitled “The Fraudulent Elections in Venezuela”. We live in a Republic comprised of three autonomous branches of government: Supreme Court, Congress and Executive, thus, a true democracy. Then WHY do you accept violations by part of the government of Venezuela to ignore its Constitution whereby one man, military-educated Chavez, controls all branches of government? His military background is revealed by his philosophy: “I order, you obey and if you disagree you’re a traitor to the country.” And your voice is silenced along with the ability of freethinking. Did you know solely the government controls 92% of media communications? You’ve strongly criticized your own governments’ overspending and corruption, whereby the budget for We the people never ends up in the hands of those who need it most. Then WHY do you support a government with over $100 million in oil revenue that has 71% poverty? Or don’t you know that corruption is so rampant that the rightfully deserving poor never sees a “red cent”? In addition, the fact is that Chavez gives away millions of dollars; belonging to the Venezuelan people, to other countries in order to build a false sense of philanthropy of a man whose self-proclaiming ego is blinded by power behind a communist Cuban-style revolution, expanding such regime. We live in the U.S.A., the land of opportunity to do and say what we desire, respecting dissenting points of view, of course and without reprisals. Then WHY do you defend a government whose stronghold upon its people is so oppressive that a big price is paid for exercising freedom of speech: Persecutions, closing of radio and television stations, jail…and even death? You are fortunate enough to live in a country where you can buy property and claim it as your own to do whatever you want with it. Then WHY do you promote the interests of a government that violates the Constitution by hindering the possibility of development: Land, industries, commerce, communications companies, foreign investment opportunities, financial institutions and private property? This is an everyday scenario in Venezuela. Then WHY haven’t you informed yourself on these facts by reading Venezuelan and international newspapers exposing thousands of cases? Given your sense of community and respect for all people, I think you would defend the security of the citizens in your country. Then WHY do you validate a government that has converted Venezuela into the second most dangerous country in the world, where impunity is above 90% and its people live in a constant state of stress and fear of getting killed? Many wonder if this situation isn’t but a diabolic strategy by the part of the government, something to think about. Do you know that the weekend of March 13th there were 67 counted homicides only in Caracas? Furthermore, in the first 50 days of this year, there have been 140 express kidnappings for fast money (a 50% increase in 2009 versus previous years). After 11 years of the Chavez government, more than 16,000 people has been murdered by armed gangs and we’re not even at war like in the Middle East. In the U.S.A. the arm of the law comes down hard on government or private sector where cases of fraud and corruption are discovered. Then WHY do you defend a politician who promised to sweep corruption, but has ended up sponsoring illicit enrichment by part of his closest allies and civil servants, placing Venezuela as the most corrupt country in the Americas and in its political history? Corruption has increased 68% and inflation 31% in 2009. What a coincidence, Sean that the majority of those “corruptors” are members of the government you have chosen to embrace. You’ve demonstrated admirable assistance to those in need, due to natural disasters or poverty, those with desperate pleas to get their misfortune exposed for the whole world to see. Then WHY do you applaud the efforts of a government that has notoriously increased poverty (65% to 71%), produced scarcity of staple products and created an energy and water shortage crisis never seen in Venezuela? Not to mention the numbers of children begging in the streets. You may have missed it because the government tends to take the scenic routes for its guests. I invite you see the real Venezuela, stay for a couple of weeks without the logistics the government of said country organizes for you and you’ll be amazed with the results in your unaided observations. Sean, you live in a country where your parents had the freedom to teach you principles and respect for entities and human beings, where education hasn’t been manipulated by political agendas of those in power. Then WHY are you in favor of a country where day after day education isn’t plural by obligating a single-minded agenda and lack of respect for family structure? Did you know Sean that in Venezuela there is political indoctrination at a very early age, better known as “brainwashing”? And let me tell you that if parents don’t agree, they will lose custody of their children, just like in Cuba, a country you’ve placed on a pedestal.You are a product of a Jewish father. Then WHY is your fascination with a government that has overtly stated its hatred against the Jewish community worldwide, to the extent that the State of Israel condemned anti-Semitic attacks in Venezuela? Do you think it’s fair that many Jewish-Venezuelan families have emigrated because the Chavez government robbed their personal files when their temples and offices were under attacked in 2008? I don’t think so, Sean, that you would support violence as a means to impose your agenda. Then WHY do you support a government with close relationships with FARC, ETA, Cuban G-2, Government of Iran, Al-Qaeda and Hezbollah, among others, which are the most feared terrorist movements in the world? You have said that you applaud the actions that Chavez has instituted for his “pueblo”. Then WHY do you back him up when he himself has recently publicly recognized his failure for effective social programs (missions) in the areas of education, social service and hospitals; where each day the number of the uncared rises for lack of appropriate facilities and respective upkeep, and a country where the mothers give birth in the streets? This you can see on YouTube in investigative programs run on German, Swedish, Italian and Spanish television stations. Sean, have you considered researching the existence of the growing list of political prisoners, including journalists, on your own? For your information Chile, Peru and Costa Rica has that data. Furthermore, many of these prisoners are tortured and their families persecuted and threatened, just like the Cuba you stand up for. Is that what you support when you publicly declare that all those that say that Chavez is a dictator should go to jail? Sean, you have the right to say what you want, but as far as I know, your statements are contradictory to “Freedom of Speech”, the same one you enjoy in this country; by coincidence, “The First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America.” My intention isn’t to convince you, but to let you know what is truly happening in this beautiful country of noble people, Venezuela. I would encourage you to investigate in depth the “inside story” and realize for yourself the dark side behind the person you choose to idolize. Agreed, Chavez did win his first elections, but like Hitler, he betrayed what the country gave him: The vote of confidence. The following is an open letter addressed to actor Sean Penn, written by Maria Conchita Alonso Al who is an outspoken critic of the elected Venezuelan leader Hugo Chávez. Dear Sean, WHY?Even though I have great respect for your artistic talent, I was appalled by a recent television interview where you vigorously showed support for the regime of Hugo Chavez. Therefore, I’ve decided to set the record straight for you regarding the Chavez regime, supporting my case based not only on my political ideologies, but on proven facts you choose to ignore. Otherwise, I believe your position would be different.Being born in Cuba, a country where freedom of speech is non-existent, it’s startling to observe how Venezuela, where I was happily raised, is fast becoming Cuba’s mirror image: Dismantling of fundamental democratic rights deserved by its people and citizens of the world.For example, you said that all Chavez-winning elections in Venezuela were “transparent.”Then WHY didn’t the government allow a manual recount of the votes and computer information when doubt set in? After all, how do you explain how these votes that were strongly favoring the opposition mysteriously reflected the opposite results the morning after, thus permitting Chavez to continue on? On what are you basing your conclusions? I strongly recommend that you read a report by the U.S. State Department written in 2009 entitled “The Fraudulent Elections in Venezuela”.We live in a Republic comprised of three autonomous branches of government: Supreme Court, Congress and Executive, thus, a true democracy.Then WHY do you accept violations by part of the government of Venezuela to ignore its Constitution whereby one man, military-educated Chavez, controls all branches of government? His military background is revealed by his philosophy: “I order, you obey and if you disagree you’re a traitor to the country.” And your voice is silenced along with the ability of freethinking. Did you know solely the government controls 92% of media communications?You’ve strongly criticized your own governments’ overspending and corruption, whereby the budget for We the people never ends up in the hands of those who need it most.Then WHY do you support a government with over $100 million in oil revenue that has 71% poverty? Or don’t you know that corruption is so rampant that the rightfully deserving poor never sees a “red cent”? In addition, the fact is that Chavez gives away millions of dollars; belonging to the Venezuelan people, to other countries in order to build a false sense of philanthropy of a man whose self-proclaiming ego is blinded by power behind a communist Cuban-style revolution, expanding such regime.We live in the U.S.A., the land of opportunity to do and say what we desire, respecting dissenting points of view, of course and without reprisals.Then WHY do you defend a government whose stronghold upon its people is so oppressive that a big price is paid for exercising freedom of speech: Persecutions, closing of radio and television stations, jail…and even death?You are fortunate enough to live in a country where you can buy property and claim it as your own to do whatever you want with it.Then WHY do you promote the interests of a government that violates the Constitution by hindering the possibility of development: Land, industries, commerce, communications companies, foreign investment opportunities, financial institutions and private property? This is an everyday scenario in Venezuela.Then WHY haven’t you informed yourself on these facts by reading Venezuelan and international newspapers exposing thousands of cases?Given your sense of community and respect for all people, I think you would defend the security of the citizens in your country.Then WHY do you validate a government that has converted Venezuela into the second most dangerous country in the world, where impunity is above 90% and its people live in a constant state of stress and fear of getting killed? Many wonder if this situation isn’t but a diabolic strategy by the part of the government, something to think about. Do you know that the weekend of March 13th there were 67 counted homicides only in Caracas? Furthermore, in the first 50 days of this year, there have been 140 express kidnappings for fast money (a 50% increase in 2009 versus previous years). After 11 years of the Chavez government, more than 16,000 people has been murdered by armed gangs and we’re not even at war like in the Middle East.In the U.S.A. the arm of the law comes down hard on government or private sector where cases of fraud and corruption are discovered.Then WHY do you defend a politician who promised to sweep corruption, but has ended up sponsoring illicit enrichment by part of his closest allies and civil servants, placing Venezuela as the most corrupt country in the Americas and in its political history? Corruption has increased 68% and inflation 31% in 2009. What a coincidence, Sean that the majority of those “corruptors” are members of the government you have chosen to embrace.You’ve demonstrated admirable assistance to those in need, due to natural disasters or poverty, those with desperate pleas to get their misfortune exposed for the whole world to see.Then WHY do you applaud the efforts of a government that has notoriously increased poverty (65% to 71%), produced scarcity of staple products and created an energy and water shortage crisis never seen in Venezuela? Not to mention the numbers of children begging in the streets. You may have missed it because the government tends to take the scenic routes for its guests. I invite you see the real Venezuela, stay for a couple of weeks without the logistics the government of said country organizes for you and you’ll be amazed with the results in your unaided observations.Sean, you live in a country where your parents had the freedom to teach you principles and respect for entities and human beings, where education hasn’t been manipulated by political agendas of those in power.Then WHY are you in favor of a country where day after day education isn’t plural by obligating a single-minded agenda and lack of respect for family structure? Did you know Sean that in Venezuela there is political indoctrination at a very early age, better known as “brainwashing”? And let me tell you that if parents don’t agree, they will lose custody of their children, just like in Cuba, a country you’ve placed on a pedestal.You are a product of a Jewish father.Then WHY is your fascination with a government that has overtly stated its hatred against the Jewish community worldwide, to the extent that the State of Israel condemned anti-Semitic attacks in Venezuela? Do you think it’s fair that many Jewish-Venezuelan families have emigrated because the Chavez government robbed their personal files when their temples and offices were under attacked in 2008?I don’t think so, Sean, that you would support violence as a means to impose your agenda.Then WHY do you support a government with close relationships with FARC, ETA, Cuban G-2, Government of Iran, Al-Qaeda and Hezbollah, among others, which are the most feared terrorist movements in the world?You have said that you applaud the actions that Chavez has instituted for his “pueblo”.Then WHY do you back him up when he himself has recently publicly recognized his failure for effective social programs (missions) in the areas of education, social service and hospitals; where each day the number of the uncared rises for lack of appropriate facilities and respective upkeep, and a country where the mothers give birth in the streets? This you can see on YouTube in investigative programs run on German, Swedish, Italian and Spanish television stations.Sean, have you considered researching the existence of the growing list of political prisoners, including journalists, on your own? For your information Chile, Peru and Costa Rica has that data. Furthermore, many of these prisoners are tortured and their families persecuted and threatened, just like the Cuba you stand up for.Is that what you support when you publicly declare that all those that say that Chavez is a dictator should go to jail?Sean, you have the right to say what you want, but as far as I know, your statements are contradictory to “Freedom of Speech”, the same one you enjoy in this country; by coincidence, “The First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America.”My intention isn’t to convince you, but to let you know what is truly happening in this beautiful country of noble people, Venezuela. I would encourage you to investigate in depth the “inside story” and realize for yourself the dark side behind the person you choose to idolize.Agreed, Chavez did win his first elections, but like Hitler, he betrayed what the country gave him: The vote of confidence. Open Letter To Sean Penn From Maria Conchita Alonso is a post from: Daily World Buzz Continue reading

Heidi Montag Unveils her Post – Plastic Surgery Look

Heidi Montag has unveiled her new face and body (following a highly publicized ten plastic procedures) as host at Pure Nightclub on Valentine’s Day in Las Vegas along with husband Spencer Pratt. She told Radaronline “I am doing Playboy again…soon, very soon…I cannot wait to show off my new (DDD) assets, I am very excited.” According Continue reading

Why Celebrity Op-Eds Suck

Pretty much anything Bono or Sean Penn write is a festival of crap that would never be tolerated from another contributor. Even James Franco sounds like a moron in today’s Wall Street Journal .

Continue reading here:
Why Celebrity Op-Eds Suck

Sophie Monk Rocks The Bikini And The Daily Odor

Sophie Monk rocks the bikini like no other – Totally Crap Bill Clinton Vs James Bond – Caveman Circus 12 Ridiculous Game Show Clips – College Humor Lindsay Lohan See Through Top – ‘)” ;=””> ‘)” ;=””> Taxi Driver Jessie Jane Clement because she is freaking awesome – On 205th Miley Cyrus as a pole dancer – HQ-Celebrity Jennifer Aniston – Upskirt pix from “The Bounty” set – Glamzilla The Ultimate Ice Cream Sandwich – City Rag Ultima Model Melinda Messenger in Lingerie – LAX Time Bears bite the hand, and body, that feeds them – Hilarity Eva Longoria Meets Tony Romo – Don Chavez Ivy Madd Puts the Horn in Horny – Twice – HGOM ‘Pon De Floor’ is PG porn, basically – Tabloid Prodigy Continue reading

U.S. Extradition Treaties

In case the whole “Switzerland arresting someone” aspect of the Polanski case threw you, here's a chart of all the countries who've signed extradition treaties with the US. The Swiss are still good with your stolen money FYI

More here:
U.S. Extradition Treaties

‘A Nightmare On Elm Street’ Trailer

Warner Bros. debuted the first teaser for their reboot of A Nightmare on Elm Street, which will star Jackie Earle Haley (Rorschach from Watchmen) as Freddy Krueger.

Visit link:
‘A Nightmare On Elm Street’ Trailer

7 Amazing One-Take Video Clips

Link: http://www.neatorama.com/2009/09/28/7… Neatorama's compiled 7 of the best one-take music videos ever.

See original here:
7 Amazing One-Take Video Clips

Power Couple Alert

Hugo Chavez and Courtney Love hit it off big-time at an Oliver Stone screening. CLove thinks he's a “sexy dawg.” All of this is true, btw, I didn't dream it up at Angsty Socialist Camp.

Here is the original post:
Power Couple Alert