Tag Archives: clinton

Robert Scheer Interviews Susan McDougal – Part One

Author: truthdig Added: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 18:10:59 -0800 Duration: 427 From Truthdig.com: When Susan McDougal refused to implicate the Clintons in the Whitewater fiasco, she was thrown in prison, left alone with murderers and her own stubborn dignity. Savaged by Republicans and abandoned by Democrats, she would emerge from that dark chapter of American history a hero. Here she joins Truthdig editor Robert Scheer to tell her amazing story.

http://flash.revver.com/player/1.0/player.swf?mediaId=143186

Here is the original post:
Robert Scheer Interviews Susan McDougal – Part One

Pakistan Out of 2010 FIFA Football World Cup

Adil Najam Unlike the 2006 FIFA World Cup, when Pakistan was represented in each and every game of the world’s premier sporting tournament – in the shape of Pakistani manufactured footballs – Pakistan will be missing in action at the 2010 FIFA Football World Cup that starts in South Africa later this week. This year’s official match football for the World Cup – Jabulani or Jo’bulani (manufactured by Adidas and meaning ‘to celebrate’ in Zulu – will come from China, not Pakistan. Pakistani footballs, of course, have a long history of being kicked around in Football World Cup tournaments. From the iconic Telstar (which was the first designated official game ball, at the 1970 Mexico World Cup and then at the 1974 World Cup in Germany) to the even more iconic Tango (the official ball of the 1978 and 1982 World Cups in Argentina and Spain), and even at the last World Cup in 2006 in Germany, hand-stitched, high-performance from Pakistan – really from Sialkot – have been the preferred choice for Adidas, the official providers of match balls to the FIFA World Cups. No longer so, it seems. Indeed, from once commanding as much as 85% of the world’s market in footballs, Pakistani manufacturers now believe that they will supply no more than 30-40 percent of the footballs sold around this mega-event. Pakistan, of course, is not a football power at all – ranked 165th out of 202 countries in the world. But like everywhere else, football fever can get high in Pakistan too ( here and here). This year, however, we would no longer be kicked around on the FIFA World Cup soccer fields. This should be read not just as a matter of national pride, but as yet another sign of the changing global economic landscape, Pakistan’s sliding economic fortunes, and a need to focus more deeply on Pakistan’s enterprise-level economic structures than we often do. The most commonly cited reason for Pakistan’s dwindling football fortunes is the use of child labor in the football industry. Even though the practice is now far less than it used to be, there are still instances of it and the stigma has lingered. In this particular case, technology may also have a lot to do with it. The new ball is being described in technological rather than craft terms: “The newly developed ‘Grip’n’Groove’ profile provides the best players in the world with a ball allowing an exceptionally stable flight and perfect grip under all conditions. Comprising only eight, completely new, thermally bonded 3-D panels, which for the first time are spherically molded, the ball is perfectly round and even more accurate than ever before.” And, of course, Pakistan’s security situation also must have had some impact in perceptions. An good overview report of the football manufacturing industry in Pakistan was recently published in The Express Tribune: Soccer or football is the most popular sport in the world. And for many, this means great economic opportunity. At one time, Pakistan’s export city of Sialkot was catering to 85 per cent of the total world demand for high-quality hand-stitched inflatable balls. A workforce of 85,000 was employed to produce 60 million balls per year worth $210 million. In Fifa World Cup years the demand for stitched balls rises by 70 per cent. Consecutive governments however, ignored this industry and failed to plan ahead to tackle the growing competition from China, India and Japan. For a long time this vital industry also faced criticism from European countries and especially from United States with allegations of using child labour. The Sialkot Chamber of Commerce and Industry took prompt measures to curb child labour from the soccer ball industry in accordance with the Atlanta Agreement signed with the International Labour Organisation (ILO) and Unicef in February 1997. It is estimated that some 93 per cent of child labour was progressively eradicated from this vital industry and necessary steps were taken to provide social protection to children and their families. The children who were associated with this industry were provided with good schooling. The vital steps taken by the soccer manufacturers and exporter were highly praised by the then United States President Bill Clinton in the address at the ILO convention at Geneva in June 1999. The Sialkot football industry has been contributing millions of export dollars to the national kitty but in the year 2006 the industry’s share in the international market took a significant hit with the entry of new players in the market, notably China and India. Manufacturers from these countries were able to supply balls at a much cheaper rate. According to industry sources, local soccer ball manufacturers have been able to grab around 30 to 40 per cent of the total orders floated globally for the upcoming Fifa World Cup. This is a sharp decline from the 70-80 per cent bagged during the 1998 and 2002 World tournaments. The local football industry earned $164 million in export earnings in the financial year 09, as against an average of $221 million per annum earned during financial years 2005-08. Power and gas shortage are not making it any easier for the industry, and sources say that a number of business have failed to meet deadlines which has dented their reputation. Technology was also a major factor in tilting the balance against the local industry. The penetration of machine-made balls hit the Sialkot hand made stitched soccer industry. And in the present scenario of fast growing globalisation hand-stitched balls will not be able to compete with machine-made footballs. It is important that the local industry moves forward and embraces new technology to meet the needs of the international market. Industry sources also say that China has received large export orders of footballs from a number of countries ahead of the June 2010 Football World Cup. Pakistan Sports Goods Manufacturers and Exporters Association is rightly concerned over this state of affairs. According to Arif Mehmood Sheikh, a former chairman (PSGMEA) the shift of a large number of orders to China should serve as an ‘eye opener’ for every one. He said that the factors behind the diversion of export orders to China was a combination of rising cost of production and inability to meet deadlines, which in turn were caused by rising POL prices and unreliable power supply. This has made it difficult for Sialkot exporters to compete with manufacturers in China, India, Nepal and Thailand. With the government looking for new avenues to bridge the fiscal deficit and the trade deficit, it is very important that measures be taken to build upon the advantages that Pakistan holds in the global market, and not allow others to encroach upon them. The Sialkot exporters have urged the government to come up with some sort of trade related package to stop the diversion of football export orders through the Trade Development Authority, likewise enforcing suitable measures to encourage the export of hand stitched fooballs. Outdated manufacturing techniques still in use by the local industry is a major hurdle in enhancing exports. This industry for its survival is in dire need of advanced technology and early provisioning of skilled labour. The Sialkot manufacturers and exporters have realised that in the event of a change in the global trend from hand stitched balls to mechanically stitched balls they will also need to make the shift. In order to cope with the menace of machine made balls, the Small and Medium Enterprise Development Authority has at put in place the final steps for the establishing of the Sports Industries Development Centre. It is expected that this project worth Rs435 million will enable the Sialkot sports manufacturing industry to adopt modern technology, without which there is no going forward. Sad as this situation is, I intend to follow the World Cup in South Africa, as will so many other Pakistanis. Probably no where more so than in Lyari – a community whose passion for soccer is boundless.

Read the rest here:
Pakistan Out of 2010 FIFA Football World Cup

NBC’s Mitchell Scolds Big Labor for Daring to ‘Embarrass’ White House

NBC’s Andrea Mitchell took up the cause of the White House in admonishing Big Labor for wasting its money on trying to defeat Arkansas Democratic Senator Blanche Lincoln in the primary there, as she echoed their concern, on Thursday’s Andrea Mitchell Reports, that organized labor essentially aided Republican John Boozman’s chances to win in the general race. Mitchell invited on AFSCME President Gerry McEntee to, in essence, reprimand Big Labor’s decision to support Lincoln’s opponent Bill Halter, when their money could have been better spent on electing Democrats elsewhere, as she scolded: “Why invest so heavily and embarrass the White House here?” The following is a complete transcript of the exchange as it was aired on the June 10 edition of MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell Reports: ANDREA MITCHELL: Blanche Lincoln’s victory was a big setback for organized labor, which opposed her nomination for the Arkansas Senate seat. Labor’s decision to try and defeat a Democratic incumbent senator prompted an anonymous White House official to complain, that it had quote, “Organized labor just flushed $10 million of their members’ money down the toilet on a pointless exercise.” Press Secretary Robert Gibbs was only slightly less critical at the briefing yesterday. (Begin clip) ROBERT GIBBS: While the President might not have agreed with the exact characterization, I think that whether or not that money might have been better spent in the fall on closer elections between somebody, between people who cared about an agenda that benefitted working families those that didn’t, that money might come in more, more handy to then. (End clip) MITCHELL: Joining me now, Gerry McEntee, president of the labor group AFSCME, the timeless, ageless Gerry McEntee, 54 years with AFSCME. Amazing. GERALD MCENTEE, AFSCME PRESIDENT: Thank you, thank you. MITCHELL: Let’s talk about that $10 million. So after 54 years with AFSCME and all your labor experience, why would organized labor flush $10 million down the toilet? It doesn’t mean to make sense to me. MCENTEE: Well first of all, I think it hast to be understood that the decision of whom to back as senator in individual states is a decision that’s made by organized labor and their members in that particular state. So the State Federation of Labor made the decision- MITCHELL: Was it a stupid decision? MCENTEE: No, I don’t think it’s a stupid decision. I think it’s about time that American labor lays down a line in the sand. I mean, you know, we’re not a captive of the White House, we’re not a captive of the Democratic Party. I mean, we stand, work for workers, and if people – take Blanche Lincoln, for example. I mean she supported NAFTA, CAFTA, jobs from Arkansas going overseas. MITCHELL: Yeah but so does John Boozman and now you’ve basically, not you personally Gerry, but organized labor in Arkansas has strengthened the Republican John Boozman. His record. He comes from the Walmart district. He comes from the whole background of being anti-union. He’s against the Employee Free Choice Act. MCENTEE: She doesn’t does do better than Walmart either. MITCHELL: Well Walmart is king in Arkansas, so Bill Clinton was a big supporter of Walmart’s. And you know, Hillary Clinton was on their board when she was First Lady of Arkansas, so that, that goes deep. But more to the point, the Republican now has a very good shot at defeating Blanche Lincoln. MCENTEE: I think he had that before the primary and the difficulty in the primary. MITCHELL: But could, then why, why spend that kind of money? That money could have been spent as, the White House is pointing out, on candidates across the country? Why invest so heavily and embarrass the White House here? MCENTEE: Well I don’t think it was meant to embarrass the White House. I mean I didn’t see her as a captive of the White House, either, I mean in terms of that election. So I didn’t, didn’t, didn’t see it as a… MITCHELL: Well the broader point though, is that this White House and organized labor are not in synch. And you’re making the point that labor is independent but you know what is the relationship with the White House? There were, they did not hesitate to slam labor yesterday morning. By 6:00am I was here and they were sending out the word. MCENTEE: Well I’m glad to hear you get up that early, though. That’s a good thing. MITCHELL: A lot earlier to be, to be ready and on camera at 6:00am MCENTEE: Yeah a lot early. Be ready, be ready. I don’t, once again, I didn’t see it as a battle between organized labor and the White House. It was a battle between a candidate that had not supported working, working families in, in Arkansas. MITCHELL: But, but Gerry, big picture. What do you think of this White House, this White House political operation and its relationship with labor? MCENTEE: Well, I think probably that it leaves something to be desired. The relationship. I don’t get to the White House very much myself, so I don’t know personally. MITCHELL: Haven’t been invited recently? MCENTEE: I have not been invited recently. MITCHELL: Have you ever been invited to this White House? MCENTEE: I’m just trying to think. Yes. I have. I think it was St Patrick’s Day, that I was there. But no, we had any number of meetings at the White House during the, the health care situation and negotiated out parts of the health care reform with the White House. But we consider it, I mean, it could be better. There isn’t any question about that, but it’s, it’s not bitter. It’s, it’s not anything like that. MITCHELL: So one of the major labor leaders in this country, a big Democrat, is saying that the relationship with the Democratic White House is not quote, “not bitter,” but it could be better. Interesting. MCENTEE: Yeah I think that. I think that’s true. MITCHELL: That’s a fair assessment? MCENTEE: I would say that. MITCHELL: Thank you very much Gerry McEntee. MCENTEE: Well thank you. Have me back soon. Please. MITCHELL: You might come here more often than you get to the White House. MCENTEE: That’s true!

Read more:
NBC’s Mitchell Scolds Big Labor for Daring to ‘Embarrass’ White House

WH Correspondents Board to Evaluate Seating Rules for Opinion Journalists

Editor’s Note : The following originally appeared at NewsBusters sister site CNSNews.com . The fallout from Helen Thomas’ controversial comments about Israel and Jews, which led to her immediate retirement on Monday, has prompted journalists covering the White House to re-evaluate the role of an opinion columnist in the White House press corps.   Thomas, 89, the so-called dean of the White House press corps, covered the White House as a news reporter for United Press International (UPI), beginning with the Kennedy administration in the early 1960s. In 2000, she left UPI to become an opinion columnist for Hearst Newspapers. She has a front row seat at the White House press gallery with her name on it.   On Friday, June 4, a video surfaced of Thomas saying (on May 27) that Israel should “get the hell out of Palestine” and that the Jews should “go home” to “Poland, Germany,” and to “America and everywhere else.” After initially apologizing for the comment, Thomas announced her immediate retirement on Monday.   The White House Correspondents Association (WHCA) board issued a statement on Monday calling Thomas’ remarks “indefensible,” but the WHCA also said the matter raises legitimate questions going forward.   “[T]he incident does revive the issue of whether it is appropriate for an opinion columnist to have a front row seat in the WH briefing room,” the statement said. “That is an issue under the jurisdiction of this board.”   The WHCA will meet this week “to decide on the seating issue.”   In a separate statement on Thomas’ retirement, the WHCA board said, “Helen Thomas has had a long and distinguished career in journalism that is unrivaled, covering 10 presidents over the past 50 years.   “Along the way, she shattered many glass ceilings, including serving as the first female president of the White House Correspondents’ Association. We are saddened by her recent comments, but we commend her for a trailblazing career, and we wish her the best.”   The WHCA decides what news organizations obtain seating in the White House Brady Press Briefing Room. However, it is the White House Media Affairs office that issues credentials to reporters.   Thomas has been a long-time critic of many of Israel’s policies.   She made her most recent and career-ending comments , during the White House Jewish Heritage celebration on May 27, in an interview with Rabbi David Nesenoff of RabbiLive.com.    Thomas first said of Israelis, “Tell them to get the hell out of Palestine. Remember, these people are occupied and it is their land. Not Germany’s. Not Poland’s.”   The interviewer asked, “Where should they go? What should they do?”   Thomas said, “Go home.”   The interviewer asked, “Where is home?”   Thomas said, “Poland, Germany.”   The interviewer then followed up, “You’re saying Jews should go back to Poland and Germany?”   Thomas answered, “And America and everywhere else.”   The video of the interview surfaced last week. On Friday, June 4, Thomas issued a written apology.   “I deeply regret my comments I made last week regarding the Israelis and the Palestinians,” Thomas said. “They do not reflect my heart-felt belief that peace will come to the Middle East only when all parties recognize the need for mutual respect and tolerance. May that day come soon.”   However, Thomas announced she was retiring effective immediately on Monday, June 7.   During Monday’s press briefing, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs condemned Thomas’ remarks.   “I think those remarks were offensive and reprehensible,” Gibbs said. “I think she should and has apologized, because – obviously those remarks do not reflect certainly the opinion of, I assume, most of the people in here, and certainly not of the administration.”   Former George W. Bush Press Secretary Ari Fleischer and former Clinton White House counsel Lanny Davis, both Jewish, publicly called for Thomas to lose her job with Hearst Newspapers or for the WHCA to take away her front row seat.   The correspondents’ association board issued its first statement shortly after news of Thomas’ retirement.   “Helen Thomas’s comments were indefensible and the White House Correspondents Association board firmly dissociates itself from them,” the statement says. “Many in our profession who have known Helen for years were saddened by the comments, which were especially unfortunate in light of her role as a trail blazer on the White House beat.   “While Helen has not been a member of the WHCA for many years, her special status in the briefing room has helped solidify her as the dean of the White House press corps so we feel the need to speak out strongly on this matter,” the statement continued.   “We want to emphasize that the role of the WHCA is to represent the White House press corps in its dealings with the White House on coverage-related issues. We do not police the speech of our members or colleagues. We are not involved at all in issuing White House credentials, that is the purview of the White House itself,” the board added.   “But the incident does revive the issue of whether it is appropriate for an opinion columnist to have a front row seat in the WH briefing room. That is an issue under the jurisdiction of this board,” the statement continued. “We are actively seeking input from our association members on this important matter, and we have scheduled a special meeting of the WHCA board on Thursday to decide on the seating issue.”

Continue reading here:
WH Correspondents Board to Evaluate Seating Rules for Opinion Journalists

GOP Women Win Primaries, ABC News Thanks Hillary Clinton

All three network morning shows touted the good showing by a bevy of Republican women and Arkansas Democrat Blanche Lincoln in yesterday’s primaries. NBC’s Today and CBS’s Early Show both headlined “Ladies Night,” while ABC’s Good Morning America’s take was “Women Rule.” But ABC fill-in anchor Elizabeth Vargas suggested credit should really go to Hillary Clinton, because she “helped by running for president,” paving the way for “all these other women about to possibly take office, high office, in those states.” Vargas’s co-host and former Clinton employee George Stephanpoulos offered no comment. Here’s how ABC’s Good Morning America opened their June 9 program: GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS, teasing at the top of the show: This morning, voters voice their anger and choose new faces in primaries across 12 states. Women and Tea Party candidates the big winners, but can they ride voter frustration all the way to Washington?… STEPHANOPOULOS opening the show: The big headline out of last night’s primaries: “Women Rule.” How about this — women candidates in four states won primaries. In California, for the first time in history, Republicans have chosen women candidates for both governor and senator. In Arkansas, Senator Blanche Lincoln bucked the anti-incumbent trend to come back against a well-funded challenger. And we’re going to talk live to the woman [Nikki Haley] who survived one of the roughest races, and now the favorite to become the first ever female governor in South Carolina. Then, after a wrap-up report by Jon Karl and Stephanopoulos’s interview with Haley: VARGAS: So many women saying – doing so well, and many saying perhaps Hillary Clinton helped by running for president. All these other women about to possibly take office, high office, in those states.

Read the rest here:
GOP Women Win Primaries, ABC News Thanks Hillary Clinton

Al and Tipper Gore decide to separate

Washington (CNN) – Former Vice President Al Gore and his wife Tipper said Tuesday that they have decided to separate. “We are announcing today that after a great deal of thought and discussion, we have decided to separate,” the Gores said in an email to friends. “This is very much a mutual and mutually supportive decision that we have made together following a process of long and careful consideration. We ask for respect for our privacy and that of our family, and we do not intend to comment further.” The separation was confirmed to CNN by Gore spokeswoman Kalee Kreider. The Gores were married in 1970 and have four grown children. Vice President Al Gore served alongside former President Bill Clinton in the White House from 1993 until 2001. Gore lost his own bid for president in 2000. He served in Congress before Clinton picked him to be his running mate in the 1992 race for the White House. In recent years, the former vice president has become a leading voice warning about the dangers of global warming. added by: TimALoftis

Stupid American Tourists & the State Dept That Loves Them

Gunmen kidnapped two American tourists in Yemen. They’ve apparently just been released. But who goes “touring” in Yemen? Did they not hear about this dude named Anwar Al-Awlaki, who is behind many recent Islamic terrorist attacks and attempted attacks on U.S. soil. His call to kill Americans might be a hint: Don’t. Go. To. Yemen. Dummies. These people are idiots. And I bet they’re either Muslims, themselves, or really, really delusional left-wingers who still see world-class armpits like Yemen as “exotic” locales for touring, and still romanticize Islam (while they hate all other religions except Buddhism). “Oh, look, Amber. Check out those charming headscarves. How quaint. Ditto for that ornate beheading knife, which I’m sure is only used on sheep.” Then, there are Shane Bauer, Sarah Shourd, and Josh Fattal–the three faux-journalists stuck in jail in Iran. The three are really pan-Islamist, anti-Israel far-lefties living in Damascus, Syria. One of them, Fattal, is supposedly Jewish. What kind of dumbass Jew from America goes hiking in Iran? Only an imbecile-owitz. Fattal and the other two knew better. If they’re living in the torturistan of the Assads (Syria), they knew full well not to go “hiking” in Iran. But they did anyway. Now, Iran and the mothers of these three Islamo-pandering stooges are pushing a “prisoner exchange deal” with the U.S. The Sarkozy idiots in France just did one, last week, releasing an Iranian arms dealer and refusing to extradite him to the U.S. for his criminal nuclear parts purchases (on behalf of Iran), in exchange for some far left French academic who went to Iran (another “tourist” who should have been left to rot there). And finally, there are Laura Ling and her sister, Lisa Ling. They’ve written a book about Laura Ling’s imprisonment in North Korea. Who told her to go there? If you go to Kim Jong-Il’s antithesis of Wonka World, you know what to expect. You’re gonna be imprisoned and tortured. She chose to go. But, instead of saying: you went at your own risk and you knew the consequences, so there’s nothing we can do, the U.S. did biz with Kim. Bill Clinton was interrupted from his position as Chief Justice of the Hawaiian Tropic bikini contest to negotiate and rescue these two faux-heroines. Now Laura and Lisa Ling’s book is all the rage on Oprah (for whom Lisa Ling reports regular propaganda), People Magazine, and everywhere else. My favorite headline is the People Magazine blare: “ESCAPE FROM NORTH KOREA.” Um, here’s a tip, People: no one escaped. The U.S. State Department and Bill Clinton repeatedly cajoled and posed to get these two spoiled, whiny women out of North Korea. added by: crystalman

The Beauty and Ugly of Parageography.

A map with a moral compass. “A map is not the territory”,….unless the territory IS Parageography,…in which case the map is an example which IS the territory,….. Oh never mind. Enjoy the map. If you love maps of allegory, worlds of imagination, wit, and humor, this should satisfy. Michael J. Helgerson

How does Mexico treat its illegals?

By Larry Elder We can't infringe upon the right of people to move freely within our territory,” said Mexican President Vicente Fox during President George W. Bush's recent visit. Earlier, Fox said he stood by the statement he previously made to the BBC: “I dare say that in 10 years, the U.S. will be begging, will be pleading with Mexico to send it workers.” Does Mexico practice what it preaches? First, Mexico put its military and police forces on its porous, zigzagged, mountainous, crime-ridden southern border with Guatemala. Chiapas – the South Carolina-sized southern Mexican state that shares the longest border with Guatemala – is Mexico's poorest, most illiterate state. About Chiapas, one United Nations human rights commissioner said, “Mexico is one of the countries where illegal immigrants are highly vulnerable to human rights violations and become victims of degrading sexual exploitation and slavery-like practices, and are denied access to education and health care.” Typically, when Mexican authorities catch illegal aliens, they place them overnight in a detention center, then bus or fly them back to their country of origin. Despite the fact that Mexico militarized its border and deported 203,128 illegal immigrants in 2004, many illegals get through by bribing corrupt military and police. Do Mexicans appreciate the way America has allowed so many poor, Mexican illegals to enter the United States? No. According to a recent Zogby poll, 73 percent of Mexicans call Americans “racist”! When asked whether the United States' wealth comes from freedom and “plenty of opportunity to work,” 70 percent of Americans agreed, while only 22 percent of Mexicans agreed. Sixty-two percent of Mexicans said America became wealthy because “it exploits others' wealth.” While Americans, according to the poll, see Mexicans as hard-working (78 percent), Mexicans think of Americans as racist, intolerant and not very hard-working. Racist? Mexico should look in the mirror. According to the Houston Chronicle's Rachel Graves, around the turn of the 17th century, Mexico imported more African slaves than anywhere else in the New World. As a result, tens of thousands of blacks (no one knows for sure – the Mexican census does not recognize them) live in Mexico, mostly in destitute villages in its poorest states. An estimated 30,000 to 40,000 blacks live in Costa Chica. How do they fare? According to the Houston Chronicle, many are illiterate, struggling to get a decent education for their children from government schools. One Costa Chica missionary says, “The kids here are considered by their teachers to be largely unteachable.” When stopped by the police, Mexican blacks are often instructed to sing the Mexican national anthem to prove their citizenship! If so many Mexicans consider Americans racist, why do polls show that nearly half of Mexico's inhabitants say that their lives would improve if they could work here illegally? Intolerant? America legally accepts about 1 million immigrants per year, with perhaps as many as 12 million people living here illegally, about half of whom come from Mexico. Many estimate that 500,000 or more people enter the country illegally every year. California Lt. Gov. Cruz Bustamante is Hispanic. So is the man who holds the powerful position of speaker of the California Assembly. Los Angeles, America's second-largest city, has a Hispanic mayor, and of the 54 members of California's congressional delegation, nine are Hispanic. The former governor of California once proposed granting driver's licenses to illegals. And in California, under some circumstances, an illegal alien can apply for the cheaper in-state college tuition. Many predict the Hispanic governor of New Mexico, Bill Richardson, former Clinton Cabinet member, will run for president. Not very hard-working? According to the International Labor Organization, Americans work more than almost anybody in the developed world, including Japan. The average American worked 1,824 hours in 2004, compared with the Spanish at 1,799 and the French at 1,441 hours. The Dutch put in even less – working 25 percent fewer hours than Americans. President Bush, against the wishes of many in his own party as well of half of all Americans, makes the reasonable case for a guest worker program that would allow or provide some sort of legal status for those living here illegally. Latino “activists” do that cause harm by staging protests and waving the Mexican flag and demanding their “rights.” For example, Juan Jose Gutierrez of Latino Movement USA says, “We think that the right thing to do is to grant full rights, full equality, under the laws in the Constitution of the United States, to all immigrants, period.” Americans raise legitimate concerns about the competition illegals pose to unskilled labor, and that illegals cut in front of people already waiting in line to get in the country legally. Americans resent expenditures for illegals on education and health care, and problems posed by some who commit additional crime in America. Illegals' attitude of entitlement helps to explain the growing anger Americans feel toward illegal aliens. Students leaving high schools, waving Mexican flags and chanting “Si se puede” do their “cause” – no favor. http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=49620 added by: nowherefast

Barack Obama Cheating Scandal Alleged; Vera Baker Denies Affair with President

Has President Barack Obama been having an affair with Vera Baker? That’s the shocking allegation made by the National Enquirer in this week’s edition. The publication claims Obama and Baker, a former campaign aide, holed up at Washington, D.C. hotel, and a “security video” could expose everything! Baker, now 35, worked tirelessly to get Obama elected to the U.S. Senate, raising millions in campaign contributions, in 2004. They grew close since. While Vera Baker insists that “nothing happened” between them, the Enquirer says anti-Obama “operatives” are digging hard into the alleged affair. Some are reportedly offering $1 million for information confirming it. Did Barack Obama and Vera Baker have an affair? That’s the allegation of sources who claim the former aide is now his mistress – and claim there’s evidence out there. According to the celebrity gossip tabloid, a limo driver (anonymous of course) claims he drove Vera to a secret hotel rendezvous with the President. He says he drove Baker “from a friend’s home in the D.C. area to the Hotel George where I learned later that Obama would be spending the night.” The driver recalled that he “waited in the lobby while she went to change her outfit. But to the best of my knowledge she did not have a room at the hotel and she was not staying there so I thought that it was a bit odd.” He says he picked up Barack Obama at the airport and drove both he and Vera Baker to various locations while he was raising money . “About 10:30 p.m., I drove them to the hotel and they went in together! My services for the evening were done,” he notes, adding that “there was absolutely no indication she was going to leave the hotel that night.” The Enquirer says the driver’s account had been independently corroborated by investigators who believe the couple spent the night together there. It also claims “on-site hotel surveillance video camera footage could provide indisputable evidence … investigators are working to obtain the tape.” “If the tape surfaces, it will explode the scandal.” Okay, look . We don’t believe this for a second. There are so many holes, we don’t even know where to begin. When did the alleged cheating on Michelle Obama take place? Is there anything beyond them staying in the same building? That said, we have to admit, we thought the same of reports that John Edwards cheated on his wife with, knocked up and tried to pay off Rielle Hunter . Look how that turned out. Granted, the Enquirer had 10 times more details there. There’s a big difference between running for President and nailing some weird videographer and actually being President and having an affair … then again, we would have said the same of Bill Clinton’s Oval Office dalliances too. Basically, don’t believe the Obama tale without a ton more evidence … but don’t assume something like this can’t happen just because it’s the Prez.

Follow this link:
Barack Obama Cheating Scandal Alleged; Vera Baker Denies Affair with President