Tag Archives: Cnn

CNN Veteran Andrew Breslau Takes Helm at Far-Left Nation Institute

Andrew Breslau, who for eight years ending in 2006 toiled at CNN “as a senior manager and producer,” has been named President of New York City-based The Nation Institute , affiliated with the far-left The Nation magazine run by frequent MSNBC guest Katrina vanden Heuvel , and home to Christopher Hayes, Rachel Maddow’s fill-in host. The institute’s August 18 press release described Breslau’s CNN duties: “Tasked with managing a team of journalists covering the U.S economy, he also helped cover events overseas that ranged from the 50th anniversary of the People’s Republic of China to the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland.” Prior to joining CNN, Breslau was quite active with a series of left-wing enterprises, starting in the mid-1980s writing for Mother Jones magazine and then helping to found Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting as its first associate director, the release from the institute’s Communications Director, Ruth Baldwin, recounted. Following several years in the early 1990s as “director of public affairs for Manhattan Borough President Ruth Messinger,” during the 1996 election cycle “he was the director of special projects for the Democratic National Committee, where he handled press relations and organized artists and celebrities on behalf of President Clinton and Democrats across the country.” Indeed, a  July 26, 1996, USA Today item by Jeannie Williams reported Breslau’s creation of “Artists for a Democratic Victory Committee.” Apparently, CNN decided that partisan activism qualified him for a slot as a producer and guest-booker.   Last week: “ AP White House Reporter Loven Jumps to Liberal Democratic Political PR/Lobbying Shop .” (My complete Obama-journalism revolving door list .) Since leaving CNN in 2006, Baldwin relayed, “Breslau has served as the Executive Director of City Futures, the parent organization of the public policy think tank, Center for an Urban Future.” The Nation Institute’s self-description: The Nation Institute’s dynamic range of programs include a bestselling book publishing imprint, Nation Books; the award-winning Investigative Fund, which supports groundbreaking investigative journalism; nationally televised town hall meetings and debates; the widely read and syndicated website TomDispatch; an internship program at The Nation magazine; Journalism Fellowships that fund up to 25 high-profile reporters every year and the prestigious Puffin/Nation and Ridenhour prizes that honor outstanding public citizenship and acts of truth-telling. Work produced by The Nation Institute has sparked Congressional hearings, new legislation, FBI investigations and the resignation of government officials, has changed the debate and has a powerful impact on the most urgent social and political issues of our day.

More here:
CNN Veteran Andrew Breslau Takes Helm at Far-Left Nation Institute

WaPo’s Eugene Robinson: Obama Is On A ‘Winning Streak’

What kind of shameless shill do you have to be to claim the President is on a winning streak as his poll numbers plummet, the economy teeters on a double-dip recession, and his Party is facing historic losses in both chambers of Congress? A Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist and former managing editor of the Washington Post, that’s who. Consider that just days after numerous polls were released showing America’s confidence in Barack Obama at an all-time low, and stallwart supporters such as CNN and the New York Times’ Maureen Dowd claimed that even George W. Bush was better at delivering a coherent message to the American people, Eugene Robinson wrote the following Friday: This is a radical break from journalistic convention, I realize, but today I’d like to give credit where it’s due — specifically, to President Obama. Quiet as it’s kept, he’s on a genuine winning streak. Robinson then listed the following items by way of recent headlines: “Last U.S. combat troops leave Iraq” “General Motors to launch stock offering” “Gulf oil spill contained” But here was the best one. In fact, it’s so good it requires a serious warning to remove all fluids, combustibles, and sharp objects from proximity to your computer: And finally, “President wades into mosque controversy”: Yes, I’m serious. Supporting the mosque in Lower Manhattan didn’t score any political points. But Obama saw his duty to uphold the values of our Constitution and make clear that our fight is against the terrorists, not against Islam itself. Instead of doing what was popular, he did what was right. He still hasn’t walked on water, though. What’s wrong with the man? Yep. Robinson is so captivated by this President that he even believes Obama has handled the Ground Zero mosque situation well. Now THAT’S some impressive shilling, wouldn’t you agree? This is sooooo good it requires what Hillary Clinton would call a willing suspension of disbelief. For instance, here are some recent headlines one would have to ignore to come to the conclusion Obama is on a winning streak: Jobless claims hit 500K, a nine-month high New jobs numbers: Bad for economy, worse for Democrats US unemployment figures increase fears of double-dip recession Critics say Obama’s message becoming ‘ incoherent ‘ If polls are any indication, GOP can expect big gains in the fall Even the Poor Are Abandoning Obama , According to Gallup Poll Data ‎ Obama Sees New Lows in Job Approval Obama Receives Low Marks in Economic Poll ‎ Poll: Majority now disapprove of Obama’s job performance 1 in 5 Americans Thinks Obama Is Muslim If this is what Robinson thinks is a winning streak, I can’t imagine what losing looks like to him.

View post:
WaPo’s Eugene Robinson: Obama Is On A ‘Winning Streak’

Weekend Forecast: Who Has the Juice to Wipe Out The Expendables?

Hint: It’s a trick question. Which isn’t to say there might not be a few surprises in today’s Weekend Forecast, but you’re going to need to see some serious attrition and infighting from the five new wide releases (not to mention an avalanche at the art house) before Stallone and the boys will give up their testosterone throne. Let’s check out the radar…

Link:
Weekend Forecast: Who Has the Juice to Wipe Out The Expendables?

Hollywood Ink: Carla Gugino is a MILF

Also in this morning’s Hollywood Ink: Maggie Gyllenhaal helps invent the vibrator… Tim Burton reconnects with some Ed Wood buddies… Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles makes a comeback… and more ahead.

See the original post here:
Hollywood Ink: Carla Gugino is a MILF

TV Bites: Now Mariah Carey Could Be Your Next American Idol Judge

Also in this morning’s TV Bites: Another call for Last Call with Carson Daly … CNN wants more Larry King… Grey’s Anatomy adds another guest star… and very slightly more ahead.

Read more:
TV Bites: Now Mariah Carey Could Be Your Next American Idol Judge

CNN and Time Promote Accusation That ‘Bigotry’ is Driving Mosque Debate

CNN’s American Morning and Newsroom programs on Thursday brought on Time magazine’s Bobby Ghosh to highlight his “Is America Islamophobic?” article and help promote his accusation that ” hate speech ” and ” bigotry ” have ” come out into the mainstream ” during the course of the debate over the proposed New York City mosque near Ground Zero. During his American Morning appearance, anchor Kiran Chetry hailed Ghosh’s article, which is the cover story of the upcoming August 30th issue of Time, as ” a very thoughtful piece .” Anchor Ali Velshi, who conducted the second interview of the Time deputy international editor, went further than his colleague: ” Okay, you’re American- Time magazine is required reading ….Bobby Ghosh… wrote the Islamophobia piece that I think everybody is going to have to read because if you are in this country, it’s part of the dialogue that we are involved in at this point .” But only days earlier, in an August 3 Time.com article about the imam behind the mosque, Ghosh stated that the “last legal hurdle to the proposed Islamic center near the site of the World Trade Center has been removed, but ignorance, bigotry and politics are more formidable obstacles …. Criticism [of the mosque] spans the gamut, from the ill-informed anguish of those who mistakenly view Islam as the malevolent force that brought down the towers to the ill-considered opportunism of right-wing politicians who see Islam as an easy target .” So the “thoughtful” Time editor whose latest is “required reading” even had the gall to criticize the families and the friends of those who died on 9/11, or who are generally emotionally-touched by the carnage of the attack. Ghosh didn’t speak so sharply during his two CNN appearance on Thursday, but he still went after what he labeled as “hate speech” in the controversy over the planned mosque. During the American Morning segment 15 minutes into the 8 am Eastern hour, Chetry first asked the editor, “Do you believe that this debate…typifies how people feel on larger scale about Muslims in America?” Ghosh seemed to walk back what he said on August 3: GHOSH: Well, let me clarify. You don’t have to be an Islamophobe to have reservations about this particular project. You don’t have to be prejudiced to have very genuine concerns about it . But what we have seen in the process of this debate and about mosques- not just here in New York, but all over this country- is that there has been a vicious- some very vicious hate speech has entered the mainstream of discussion in this country, and that is- certainly, we are seeing some Islamophobic views being expressed by people who we wouldn’t have expected it from – when you have legitimate political figures comparing the religion of Islam to Naziism. That is something on a scale that we have never seen before. The Time deputy editor pushed this point throughout this first interview: GHOSH: There are lots of people who feel- not unreasonably, they feel emotionally attached to that particular space. There are people who are concerned genuinely for the feelings of the families of the victims at the World Trade Center. There are people who have- as I said, perfectly legitimate reasons to have concerns. But what this debate has done is that has brought out- from previously, what was in the fringes into the mainstream, along with reasonable people- a lot of hate speech and a lot of very vicious hate speech that we haven’t heard before . CHETRY: And not just the mosque debate- the controversy over this one- but we’ve seen a bit of a change, many say, over the past few years. Any of it linked to the fact that we’ve seen more instances of either attempted or homegrown terror that we thought- I mean after 9/11, a lot of people said this is a problem the United States doesn’t have- what Europe has, problem with radicalization within our borders- and we have the Times Square bomber and a few other thwarted attempts or plots- has that added to this fear and feeling that Islam in America, perhaps, is radical in some way? GHOSH: Absolutely. There is certainly alarm that has grown in concern and suspicion. But there are also people who are taking advantage of this for political reasons- who are taking advantage of this concern- who are take advantage of the fact that a lot of Americans don’t know very much about Islam. It is a very small religion in this country, compared with some other places in the world. So many Americans- and we have a poll that shows this- we don’t really know that much about it. So- and now you have people, who for political reasons, are taking advantage of the combination of fear and lack of knowledge, and adding to this- this toxic language, and are spreading- sometimes, knowing full well- spreading lies and misrepresentations about the faith, and are tarring an entire community- an entire religion with the brush- that they are all from- that they’re all potentially terrorists . That your neighbor, who is an American citizen, and- by all polling, who’s proud to be an American citizen- happens to be a Muslim- may potentially be someone who’s plotting against us. Five and a half hours later, at the bottom of the 1 pm Eastern hour of CNN’s Newsroom, Ghosh repeated his main points, and even added an accusation of “racism” against the opponents of the mosque and other Islamic projects in the country: GHOSH: There’s a lot of Islamophobia growing in this country . It’s not as bad as some parts of Europe. There are no neo-Nazi thugs going around beating up American Muslims. But there is a lot of hate speech, and it’s getting louder and more vicious . And in these mosque protests, not just the one here in the New York, but all over the country- in these mosque protests, we’ve seen that hate speech take on a new and more venomous tinge to it. And here’s the worst part: it’s now come out into the mainstream and we’re listening to figures- not fringe lunatics, if you pardon the expression- but we’re listening to people who are held in wide respect in this country, say things that, in other contexts, would be considered completely inappropriate . VELSHI: Have you been able to come up with contexts to give examples of where it would be appropriate- inappropriate? Where we wouldn’t use this kind of language to talk about another identifiable group? GHOSH: I don’t think any identifiable group but the Muslims in this country. I don’t think Newt Gingrich could say that- could compare them with Nazis. I think that would be considered- he- it would never occur to him. But as somebody who I spoke to during the story told me, Islamophobia is now the accepted form of racism in this country. Muslims feel that people are allowed in the public sphere to say whatever they want to say about Islam, and they can get away with it. The editor then gave an example of what he saw was “hate speech” against Islam and/or Muslims: GHOSH: Things did get quite a lot worse after 9/11. We weren’t paying that much attention because there was a war coming. There was enormous human tragedy in the city. And so, we didn’t pay that much attention when someone like Pat Robertson or Jerry Falwell compared the prophet Muhammed to a terrorist, and somebody else said he was a pervert. But if you were a Muslim-American, you were paying attention . Then things did quiet down, and to a substantial degree, the credit goes to President Bush, who made it clear right from the get-go, from the 12th of September- VELSHI: Our war is not with Muslims- GHOSH: It’s not with Muslims. It’s a religion of peace. It’s just a small band of extremists that we are fighting. But then more terrorist acts took place- more recently, there have been acts committed by Muslim-Americans. America went to war in two Muslim countries. You started hearing about suicide bombings on television every day. So, a certain fear and sense of alarm crept in, which is all right- which is permissible. But then you have people who have made it their business to capitalize on that sense of alarm for political gains- who have stoked up this thing and sort of deliberately spread very poisonous lies about the religion and about the people who practice that religion, and put it out there into the public theater . So Robertson and Falwell’s historically-accurate assertion that Mohammed was a 7th century-version of a terrorist, particularly in his treatment towards the Jews of the Arabian peninsula , is “hate speech” in Ghosh’s book. Furthermore, it is completely legitimate to point out that Muhammad was a pervert according to many culture’s standards, as his wife Aisha was betrothed to him when she was six or seven years old, and their marriage was consummated when she was nine or ten, according to the very hadith writings held up by Islam . One might guess it’s “hate speech” to point that out as well. Velshi, who worried on Wednesday’s Newsroom that if a government helped moved the site of the planned mosque, other governments  would ” entertain petitions of moving Catholic churches away from the Oklahoma bombing site ,” since Timothy McVeigh was baptized Catholic, actually helped forward some of the editor’s talking points later in the interview: GHOSH: Four in ten Americans have a negative view of Islam, and that’s a very dangerous proportion . And so, some of the challenge for the Muslim community is to communicate better, is to give a better sense of what Islam really is, is to persuade people that they’re not all to be tarred with one brush. And ironically, that is what the people behind Park 51, the cultural center here in New York- that’s what they’re trying to do. They’re trying to communicate that Islam is not what many Americans perceive . That it is a- VELSHI: Right-right. But every part of their message has been lost? GHOSH: At the moment, yes. VELSHI: The name Cordoba- some people are associating it with Muslim rule and bloody battles, when, in fact, Cordoba was one of the finest times in relations between the major religions . GHOSH: Exactly right- in interfaith discourse- VELSHI: Yeah- GHOSH: And the great mosque of Cordoba that people are talking about and that Newt Gingrich was talking about- the man who built it, the Muslim prince who built it, bought it from a Christian group- paid money for it and bought it from a Christian group. And there was not a lot of alarm and anger raised then. It’s- as I said, we- I’m afraid, at this point, no rational discussion seems possible- VELSHI: Right- it’s just too hot. GHOSH: It will take us a little while, and temperatures have to cool down. Maybe we have to wait for this election to get over (unintelligible)- VELSHI: What’s difficult- and I was going to say- what’s difficult is that it’s been difficult for people who would like to have a reasonable discussion about this to do so, because they are then lumped with being politically correct or things like- in fact, it’s hard. We’ve heard politicians who have come out in defense of letting this mosque be built sound like they are apologists or some sort. Now, everybody now is backing away from the positions that defend free speech. GHOSH: No less a person than the president of the United States, which, for many Muslims, is quite disappointing. It will take an act of statesmanship. Statesmanship is when you can rise above the public sentiment and bring people along with you. If we went with the majority, there would still be segregation in this country. If we went with the majority- VELSHI: Women wouldn’t vote in this country . GHOSH: Exactly- American Jews would still be- still not have all their rights. So, it’s time for leadership. It’s time for our politicians- and if it doesn’t come from politics, it may have to come from somewhere else- it’s time for Americans to step up and say, this will not be allowed in this country. This country was built on finer principles than this, and we are going- we’re not going to tolerate this kind of prejudice, this kind of bigotry, and this kind of Islamophobia.

More here:
CNN and Time Promote Accusation That ‘Bigotry’ is Driving Mosque Debate

Rick Sanchez: CNN is ‘Middle’; Fox News ‘Way, Way, Way to the Right’

On Wednesday’s Rick’s List, CNN’s Rick Sanchez returned to his obsession with Fox News , stating that the network ” obviously tends to lean way, way, way to the right .” He did acknowledge this his competitors at MSNBC ” tends to sway to the left ,” but went on to extend his ” I play it down the middle ” label of himself to his entire liberal network: ” We happen to be in the middle, and that’s the way we do things ” . The anchor, who denied that he had any ideological leanings less than a month ago , brought on correspondent Jessica Yellin 17 minutes into the 4 pm Eastern hour to report on the political donations of News Corporation, which own their competitor, Fox News. Yellin reported that News Corp. “has given a million to the Republican Governors Association.” Sanchez replied that “there is nothing wrong with giving money….Time Warner is a big company. I’m sure Time Warner gives money to different organizations, except I have no idea what it is.” He then asked, “So, what I want from you is, the $1 million figure, all those zeroes…is it different? Is it substantially different?” The correspondent answered that apparently, the owner of Fox News donates “exponentially more than other organizations- news organizations’ parent companies give to any one organization in a year.” She displayed the figures, as reported by CQ MoneyLine, with an on-screen graphic, that News Corp. gave $1,089,000 to Republicans and $113,000 to Democrats during the 2009-2010 period. Yellin continued that “our parent company [Time Warner] gave $91,500 to Republicans in the last two years, and $135,500 to Democrats….So, $135,000, compared to more than a million- it’s a magnitude scale difference.” Later in the segment, the CNN correspondent moved on to donations of GE, the parent company of their competitor MSNBC: “GE is the one company that’s given as much money- almost as much money total, but not to one group….But they’re not just a media company. They’re technology, financial services.”  She continued that “the Democratic Governors Association is calling on Fox to have a disclaimer on air, saying- hey, we gave- our parent company gave this much money to the RGA.” Sanchez replied with his “way, way, way to the right” label and continued with his take on the ideological stances of MSNBC and his own network: ” You know, you’re allowed to have a perspective. One of our other competitors tends to sway to the left. So, that’s the way it works. And we happen to be in the middle, and that’s the way we do things. ” Earlier in 2010, the New York Times reported that CNN was touting itself as “the only credible, nonpartisan voice left” on cable television. Writer Stuart Elliott’s quoted from network president Jonathan Klein during a presentation to advertisers: “‘Our mission, our mandate, is to deliver the best journalism in the world,’ said Jonathan Klein….’ No bias, no agenda .’ That philosophy ‘puts us in a category of one,’ he added, as CNN’s competitors ‘have abandoned the field’ of objective reporting .” Three CNN personalities with documented examples of liberal bias- Anderson Cooper , Candy Crowley , and Wolf Blitzer – appeared on a panel during the presentation. The transcript of the relevant portion of the segment from Wednesday’s Rick’s List: SANCHEZ: So, a lot of folks have been talking about this story. This is News Corp., and- you know, part of the reason this becomes newsworthy is, it’s one of our competitors- JESSICA YELLIN: Yes. SANCHEZ: Fox News. They’re owned by Rupert Murdoch- that’s News Corp. He has given- what, a million dollars to the GOP? YELLIN: Their parent organization, News Corp., has given a million to the Republican Governors Association- SANCHEZ: Right. YELLIN: A Republican group-  the association, yeah. SANCHEZ: So, I guess what I want to get from you- and to put it- to make it fair, because- look, there is nothing wrong with giving money. It’s the way this system works. YELLIN: Right. SANCHEZ: All big- we are a big company. Time Warner is a big company. I’m sure Time Warner gives money to different organizations, except I have no idea what it is. I mean, I have nothing to do with it. You have nothing to do with it. But that’s part of the process. So, what I want from you is, the $1 million figure, all those zeroes- YELLIN: Yes. SANCHEZ: Is it different? Is it substantially different? YELLIN: It’s exponentially more than other organizations- news organizations’ parent companies give to any one organization in a year. SANCHEZ: Really? YELLIN: We made up a graph. I’m not- do we have the graphic? SANCHEZ: Hey, do we have that, guys? YELLIN: I’m not sure if we have it. But- SANCHEZ: We do. We got it- go. YELLIN: Great. Look at this. So, that’s News Corp. That’s how much they gave to Republicans, all told, and Democrats. Look at the comparison between the two, okay? (Sanchez laughs) And then, if we can advance to look at some of the other news organizations, as you say, Time Warner- okay, that’s all we have.  But, to give you an example, Time Warner- SANCHEZ: Okay- yeah? YELLIN: Our parent company gave $91,500 to Republicans in the last two years, and $135,500 to Democrats. SANCHEZ: Okay. YELLIN: So, $135,000, compared to more than a million- it’s a magnitude scale difference. SANCHEZ: It means we’re cheap. (laughs) YELLIN: (laughs) Don’t let the bosses hear you say that. Yeah, and- you know- look, Rick, to be fair, this is why some critics say corporate ownership of media is bad. They worry that this does influence the process. SANCHEZ: Oh, there’s the graphic, by the way, that you were talking about a little while ago. YELLIN: There’s Time Warner. SANCHEZ: Yeah. YELLIN: GE is the one company that’s given as much money- almost as much money total, but not to one group- SANCHEZ: And they own? YELLIN: But they’re not just a media company. SANCHEZ: Yeah. YELLIN: They’re technology, financial services. They own NBC. SANCHEZ: Right. YELLIN: I mean, the bottom line, as you know, Fox is always going on- their message is ‘fair and balanced,’ ‘fair and balanced.’ Now, the Democratic Governors Association is calling on Fox to have a disclaimer on air, saying- hey, we gave- our parent company gave this much money to the RGA. SANCHEZ: That’s interesting. And, of course, the argument would be Fox News obviously tends to lean way, way, way to the right. Most people- YELLIN: So you say. SANCHEZ: So- yeah, right.(both Sanchez and Yellin laugh) I don’t know why I came up with that. YELLIN: It’s fair and balanced. SANCHEZ: I don’t know why I came up with that. YELLIN: Haven’t you seen the graphic? (laughs) SANCHEZ: Maybe it’s because I have watched from time to time. But- well, that’s fine. You know, you’re allowed to have a perspective. One of our other competitors tends to sway to the left. So, that’s the way it works. And we happen to be in the middle, and that’s the way we do things. So, the argument is then- look, the fact of the matter is, you’re accused of going to the right, and now, you give this huge check for a million dollars, and the Democrats are accusing them by saying- that seals the deal. YELLIN: It’s pure bias- it’s proven, is what the Democrats say. Now, they say- Fox, the owners of Fox say- hey, actually, this organization, the Republican governors, reflect our political- our business values. They’re going to stand for lower taxes and less regulation, and that’s what we like. So- SANCHEZ: Interesting. YELLIN: The truth is, it’s honestly a lot about business decisions, but this is why it’s important to: A, have transparent media- have transparency in donations. We need to know this stuff, and it’s important for all this information to be getting out more often than it does. SANCHEZ: And, by the way, just to be fair to Fox and to Rupert Murdoch and to News Corp., there’s no- there’s nothing to suggest here that they were trying to hide anything, right? YELLIN: No! SANCHEZ: No. It’s out in the open. YELLIN: No. It’s out there.

Continued here:
Rick Sanchez: CNN is ‘Middle’; Fox News ‘Way, Way, Way to the Right’

Maureen Dowd: Obama Needs Bush’s Help On Ground Zero Mosque

Mark August 18, 2010, on your calendar as the day New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd published a piece bashing Barack Obama and praising George W. Bush. This comes less than 24 hours after CNN.com did exactly the same thing over the same issue. Needless to say, Dowd’s position in her column entitled “Our Mosque Madness” went completely contrary to public opinion regarding the building of an Islamic center at Ground Zero. But before we get there, let’s first take a look at a few paragraphs destined to give many readers whiplash as they slam on their reading brakes in disbelief: The war against the terrorists is not a war against Islam. In fact, you can’t have an effective war against the terrorists if it is a war on Islam. George W. Bush understood this. And it is odd to see Barack Obama less clear about this matter than his predecessor. It’s time for W. to weigh in. This – along with immigration reform and AIDS in Africa – was one of his points of light. As the man who twice went to war in the Muslim world, he has something of an obligation to add his anti-Islamophobia to this mosque madness. W. needs to get his bullhorn back out. And it is odd to see Barack Obama less clear about this matter than his predecessor. It’s time for W. to weigh in. Actually, what’s odd to see is this liberal stalwart bashing an unabashedly liberal President – maybe the most liberal President America has ever seen! – while praising the object of her disaffection in the very same paragraph. Forgive me – I’ve got to take a few moments to compose myself. After all, didn’t Dowd just three days prior tear into Obama’s left-leaning critics – including MSNBCers with rare unkind words for the current White House resident! – for having the nerve to speak ill of the leader of the growing less and less free world? Now in roughly 72 hours, this same woman is so disappointed in her hero that she excoriated him with the ultimate dissing: even W understands this issue better than you! That could leave a scar that will only come out with serious counseling. Of course, readers shouldn’t get giddy over the President being humiliated by a fan, for Dowd had a larger point:  Have any of the screaming critics noticed that there already are two mosques in the same neighborhood – one four blocks away and one 12 blocks away. Should they be dismantled? And what about the louche liquor stores and strip clubs in the periphery of the sacred ground? By now you have to be willfully blind not to know that the imam in charge of the project, Feisal Abdul Rauf, is the moderate Muslim we have allegedly been yearning for. As I’m still recovering from the W is better than O at something remark, let me bring in Commentary’s Jennifer Rubin to assist in tearing apart this inanity: Uh, not really. We’re yearning for a Muslim who specifically condemns Hamas as a terrorist group and doesn’t suggest that the U.S. is responsible for 9/11. We’re yearning for a Muslim who doesn’t use “hallowed ground” – where 3,000 Americans died at the hands of Islamist extremists – to build a “a symbol of victory for militant Muslims around the world.” ( That from an American Muslim whose mother was incinerated on 9/11 by those who “believed that all non-Muslims are infidels and that the duty of Muslims is to renounce them.”) We’re yearning for a Muslim who is “desperate to reform his faith” and forthright in his assessment that the placement of the mosque at Ground Zero is based on “a belief that Islamic structures are a political statement and even Ground Zero should be looked upon through the lens of political Islam and not a solely American one.” (That from a Muslim and former U.S. Navy officer.)  So much for Maureen’s moderate Muslim moniker. But let’s allow that to pass for a moment, as what seems more interesting than her typically errant banter about this so-called religion of peace was that Dowd wasn’t the only liberal columnist to suggest in the past few days that Obama needs help on this issue from Bush. As Byron York wrote Wednesday at the Washington Examiner, this appears to be a strain being caught by others: Washington Post columnist Eugene Robinson is also looking for an assist from Bush. “I…would love to hear from former President Bush on this issue,” Robinson wrote Tuesday in a Post chat session. And Peter Beinart, a former editor of the New Republic, is also feeling some nostalgia for the former president. “Words I never thought I’d write: I pine for George W. Bush,” Beinart wrote Tuesday in The Daily Beast. “Whatever his flaws, the man respected religion, all religion.” For the moment, with Obama failing to live up to expectations, Bush-bashing is over. It’s all a little amusing — and perhaps a little maddening — for some members of the Bush circle. When I asked Karl Rove to comment, he responded that it means “redemption is always available for liberals and time causes even the most stubborn of ideologues to revisit mistaken judgments.” But won’t these Bush critics shortly return to criticizing Bush? “This Bush swoon by selected members of the left commentariat is temporary,” Rove answered. “Their swamp fevers will return momentarily.” Well, if it doesn’t, liberals can rest assured the Obama administration is working on a vaccine it hopes will be far more effective at preventing this malady than the one it forced upon Americans to fend off the dreaded swine flu.

Read the original post:
Maureen Dowd: Obama Needs Bush’s Help On Ground Zero Mosque

2 largest liars/skeptics on climate change admit it’s happening and human caused

“Stu Ostro, Senior Meteorologist at the Weather Channel: “I changed my point of view from what it was in the days of the Fred Singer article, and would do so again if that’s what the evidence shows. But it does not. As I wrote back in 2006, global warming is not a religion. The chemistry, physics, and thermodynamics involved are science, not religion, nor are they liberal or conservative.”” http://current.com/1b9jn4c And from a different article: “CNN's long time climate change skeptic and purveyor of every wingnut talking point on global warming in the book, Chad Myers, finally admits the truth: “Is it caused by man? Yes. Is it 100% caused by man? No.”” http://current.com/179jn4c added by: TopScruffy

Cenk Suggests The 70% Of Americans Who Oppose Ground Zero Mosque Are ‘Ignorant’

Different host, same liberal bias . . . Subbing for Ed Schultz on MSNBC this evening, Cenk Ugyur suggested that the roughly 70% of Americans who oppose the Ground Zero mosque are “ignorant.”  Ugyur was debating the mosque matter with Republican strategist and former Newt staffer David Winston.  Winston suggested that the people behind the mosque could, in light of the overwhelming oppposition of Americans to the plan, show sensitivity by agreeing to site it elsewhere. That provoked Cenk’s snide insult, which, as you’ll see, actually revealed his own lack of knowledge on the subject . . . DAVID WINSTON: What I’m saying is, 70% of this country doesn’t like this idea. There’s a unique opportunity for Muslims to show, look, we understand Americans have difficulty with this, and we’re willing to have, to move somewhere else.  There’s just a sense of like, look, if we’re going to cooperate and get along, and things are going to work, people are going to have to understand the concerns that other folks have — CENK UGYUR: So you’re saying, you’re saying two things from what I’m hearing. One is, if 70% of the country is ignorant, we should back that up. If they don’t know the Constitution or they think Muslims are the same as al Qaeda, we should back that up.  Cenk suggests that those “ignorant” Americans “don’t know the Constitution.”  But if he had taken the time to inform himself of the poll question that CNN had put to people, and which generated the overwhelming response, he would have found that it read [emphasis added]: “As you may know, a group of Muslims in the U.S. plan to build a mosque two blocks from the site in New York City where the World Trade Center used to stand. Do you favor or oppose this plan? ” So that 70% [68% to be precise] weren’t asked, and weren’t opining, that they thought Muslims didn’t have a right to build the mosque. They were simply expressing their personal opinion to the effect that they “oppose the plan.”  And that is their constitutional right.  So who’s ignorant now?

Read the original post:
Cenk Suggests The 70% Of Americans Who Oppose Ground Zero Mosque Are ‘Ignorant’