Actress’ rep tells CNN that Fisher was kidding when she said she had signed on for ‘Star Wars: Episode VII.’ By Gil Kaufman Carrie Fisher Photo: Frazer Harrison/ Getty Images
Shane Black goes deep into the villain’s origins and sheds the comic’s Chinese stereotypes along the way. By Kevin P. Sullivan, with reporting by Kara Warner Ben Kingsley as Mandarin in “Iron Man 3” Photo: Walt Disney Pictures
So Girls Aloud are apparently on tour again, which is awesome, because it means more pictures of my first future ex-wife and all-time favorite British pop star Cheryl Tweedy . I just read that the tour is for the girl group’s 10th anniversary, which means it must be my 10th anniversary with Cheryl too, and I forgot all about it. What kind of present are you supposed to give each other for 10 years? That’s the nudie picture anniversary, right? Fingers crossed. » view all 21 photos Related Posts Cheryl Tweedy In Tight Leather Pants! Cheryl Tweedy, I Love You Forever Cheryl Tweedy Is A Major Disappointment Cheryl Tweedy Provides Some Sexy Comic Relief Photos: WENN.com
Clip for their Comic Relief single brings fans along around the globe, and in the shower! By Jocelyn Vena One Direction’s Harry Styles in “One Way or Another” Photo: Simco Limited
I hate “Who Would You Rather Do”….and other virgin losers sitting around the comic book store games…..you know because firstly it’s a waste of time since the option of fucking one, let alone both is pretty much non existent, and that life decision is one that will never happen…..so jerk off fantasies publicly discussed amongst chronic masturbating weirdos…just makes me uncomfortable…. That said, I’d rather do Ashley Benson….and it isn’t a racist thing, or a popularity thing, because I dont know who she is….I just know that Selena Gomez has some weirdness going on in that pantsuit and Vanessa Hudgens is built like a barrel….unless Ashley Benson doctored these pics…which is possible since it was on her instagram… Ultimately…who cares…this Spring breakers shit has gone too far….ang gets too much press…while really it’ll be the least nude thing Harmony Korine ever made in his attempt at uber mainstream….even though having any movie made, especially in the 90s, is pretty fucking mainstream…he just doesn’t want you knowing that….it fucks with his street cred as an “artist”…
Now that Disney has announced that the Brad Bird / Damon Lindelof project originally known as 1952 will officially be called Tomorrowland (and that George Clooney will star), I simply must share my fever-dream theory that this movie will be about early space travel. Note that I wrote “could.” Like everyone else out there, I’m speculating based on a handful of clues that Bird and Lindelof have released into the atmosphere: the movie’s title, and the contents of the banker’s box marked “1952” that Lindelof allegedly discovered at Disney. Last week, Bird tweeted a photo of what was in the box: some yellowed photos, a film reel and what looks like a 45 record. An eagle-eyed blogger at Ain’t It Cool News also spied what it’s reporting is the August 1928 cover of Amazing Stories comics peaking through the clutter. The website notes that that particular issue contains the first-ever Buck Rogers story to appear in any media. (The character’s name was Anthony Rogers initially. He’d become the more manly Buck the following year.) The Buck Rogers storyline is interesting, and, actually, it’s not antithetical to my theory, but if the comic does play a role in the plot of Tomorrowland , there’s another story contained within that fits more appropriately with the movie’s official title. The cover of that particular issue of Amazing Stories illustrates the beginning serialization of “The Skylark of Space,” a story by Edward E. “Doc” Smith that, in the 1940s, eventually became a novel of the same name, and is considered an early and influential story about space travel that’s right up there with the work of Jules Verne and H.G. Wells. The “Skylark of Space” is about a scientist who discovers how to harness a newly discovered element “X” for space travel at the speed of light. Now consider this: When Tomorrowland opened as a future-themed section of Disneyland in 1955, the centerpiece exhibit was the 76-foot tall TWA Moonliner rocketship (below right) that was built with the help of the “Father of Rocket Science” Werner Von Braun, who designed the German V-2 rockets that were used in World War II and, after the war, went to work for NASA, where he engineered the Saturn V rocket that took the Apollo astronauts to the moon. The TWA Moonliner was an early, Disneyfied iteration of America’s space dreams: a collaboration of Disney Imagineering and Von Braun’s scientific mind that envisioned what a commercial spacecraft to the moon would look like. (It was a far cry from the spider-like Lunar Module that eventually did take men to the moon in 1969.) The speculation around the casting of Clooney is that he’ll play Walt Disney, which makes a lot of sense, but if you look at pictures of Von Braun, The Descendants star could easily play Werner as vell. (Speaking of rocket scientists, I can’t get a clear enough bead on the top-most photo in that banker’s box but the bald guy standing next to Walt Disney looks like Robert H. Goddard, who is credited with building the first liquid-fueled rocket. Then again, if the photo was taken in 1952, it can’t be Goddard. He died in 1945.) So, what would the plot be, you ask? Well, if Tomorrowland and the Amazing Stories issue are both valid clues, then, I’m thinking, the movie is a mix of history and science fiction where the TWA Moonliner goes on an actual trip into space in 1952 before being parked at the theme park. Can’t you see the shot of the ship having just returned to Earth after some white-knuckle re-entry scenes, morphing into a shot of the rocket surrounded by tourists at Disneyland? I can. I can also see Howard Hughes, who owned TWA at the time, and other real-life figures playing roles in the movie. Okay, you heard my theory. Now tell me yours before the movie opens on Dec. 14, 2014, but hurry. I’ll be going to moon — bang-zoom!— a lot sooner than that. [ Ain’t It Cool News , Brad Bird ] Follow Frank DiGiacomo on Twitter. Follow Movieline on Twitter.
This broad is nuts! Via NYDailyNews Memo to Anderson Cooper: Your resolution for 2013 may want to be to stop inviting Kathy Griffin back for CNN’s New Year’s Eve live coverage. Griffin, who dropped the F bomb in 2009 and attempted to strip down to her underwear last year, outdid herself Tuesday night in her quest to shock the veteran newsman by referring to his genitalia on air and later attempting to simulate oral on her openly gay best friend. Cooper dropped the ball — metaphorically speaking — a few minutes into the broadcast when he brought up a Twitter follower’s comments that there could be a drinking game whenever he giggled at Griffin’s jokes. “I’m going to tickle your sack,” his comic co-host immediately said. “You can say sack [on air.] That’s not bad.” “I don’t know what you’re talking about. I have no sack of gifts here,” Cooper stammered. “A sack of Christmas presents. I did not bring a sack of Christmas presents.” That was just the beginning of the obscenely awkward exchange between these two, peep the video below for a visual. Image via YouTube
Judd Apatow knows that in casting his real life wife and children in his latest film, the seriocomic Knocked Up spin-off/sequel This Is 40 , he’s inadvertently invited the world to peek into his own life, marriage, issues, and neuroses. Still, despite the many parallels one might draw between Paul Rudd ‘s Pete (now a struggling indie record label owner) and Leslie Mann ‘s Debbie (whose own small business and marital woes are nothing compared to impending big 4-0), Apatow insists most of This is 40 is fictionalized. Okay, much of it. Well, he doesn’t escape to the bathroom to play games on his iPad like Pete does. “I’m more about reading the Huffington Post ,” Apatow joked. Apatow may have built his comic empire on R-rated man-child tales rife with fart and dick jokes (not to mention sweet, sweet bromance) but with This is 40 the writer-director takes a considered look inward at marriage and relationships. They’re never perfect — even between Hollywood creatives like Apatow and Mann, whose daughters Maude and Iris play heightened versions of themselves in the film — but as Apatow mused in our conversation rife with relationship real talk, personal reflections, and necessary tangents about Maude’s real life LOST obsession and Apatow’s 1995 kids’ camp movie Heavyweights : “Imagine that you had to spend every second of the rest of your life with your best friend. How often do you think they would annoy you?” Out of all the characters you’ve created onscreen, you spun off Pete and Debbie into their own film — the two characters whose lives are closest to your own. What was the impetus for wanting to explore this particular relationship further? I have two interests; I’m trying to make funny movies and I also want to explore the human condition, and I want to be truthful about it. And the truth is in any relationship you have good times and loving times, and sometimes it goes really dark. And sometimes out of nowhere, something just blows. People bring a lot of baggage into their relationships and I think most people are pretty neurotic. Life is pretty overwhelming for most people. If you have any concern about being a good spouse and parent and having your job work out and your health — you’re just spinning too many plates. And once in a while we snap, so I was trying to show a truthful version of what happens when that occurs — sometimes that’s really funny and sometimes it’s just sad, and people’s fears come out. When you first began working up the seeds of This is 40 , was there any hesitation knowing that people out there might watch the film and wonder, ‘So that’s how it is in their family?’ about you and Leslie? For some reason I didn’t worry about because I thought we already did it with Knocked Up. And it is a mutated version of us. It’s very heightened — a lot of the moments, the worst moments, for dramatic and comedy purposes – but for the most part we’re pretty boring. Once in a while it does go the wrong way, but then you have to figure out how to get it back. That’s what a long-term commitment is about; sometimes you make mistakes and you have to apologize and be kind to each other again. I always say to my kids whenever they ask me, ‘Why do you guys fight?’ — I say, ‘Imagine that you had to spend every second of the rest of your life with your best friend. How often do you think they would annoy you?’ And, you know, that’s how we feel about it. We love each other but we’re complicated people — and it’s hard for me to know if part of it is this is why we’re in this business, because we’re sensitive, complicated, wounded people and we’re trying to get along with each other. [Laughs] But most of it is fabricated. Nothing in the movie feels specifically true, it didn’t happen to us, but the emotions are very truthful, the feelings and the conflicts are all based on things that we relate to. Even so, you know that some folks out there are going to imagine you sitting on the toilet playing Words With Friends on your iPad every morning. I’m more about reading the Huffington Post . [Laughs] I would sit on the toilet all day if my legs wouldn’t go numb. If I could create a toilet seat that didn’t lead to my legs going numb… This is 40 is also a rare opportunity to see Leslie front and center; she has this wonderful ability to play deep sadness and humor simultaneously. Do you have a favorite scene of hers from the films you’ve worked on together? My favorite scene that we’ve ever done together was the scene in Funny People where Adam Sandler’s character apologizes to her character for cheating on her when they were young, and ruining their chance at having a long-term relationship. We shot it with three cameras and it was very emotional, and I was proud of both of them. Of everything I’ve done it’s one of my two or three favorite scenes. She has a way of being very funny while also being deeply emotional, so she can be dramatic and show pain and get laughs at the same time. I’m not even really sure how she accomplishes that, it’s just some aspect of her vibe which allows her to do many different colors at once. That’s the fun of working with her. And she’s always willing to do whatever it takes to get to an honest moment. She never says, ‘I don’t want to do that,’ or ‘That would be embarrassing,’ if anything she pushes to go farther and wants to get to the core of her character. There were definitely moments when we were making [ This is 40 ] when we said, ‘What are we doing? This is crazy’ — especially if there was a day when we weren’t getting along. We’re making this movie about a couple and their love and their troubles, so on the days when we’re not liking each other it just feels like a complete waste of time. Did it also then help to be making this movie? You have entire scenes where the dialogue pokes fun at couples therapy-speak, and it’s hilarious to point out how much, in the heat of the moment in a fight with your significant other, no amount of preparedness or civility training helps. Yes! I know everything about therapy and so can break every rule of how you’re supposed to communicate in five seconds. You just have to learn to slow your brain down and be patient and not feel the need to win every moment, and I don’t know if there’s anything harder on Earth than doing that. Giving up your need to be correct is brutal, especially for me because I think I have to be very confident in my day job. All day long I’m making decisions very quickly and I have to be very strong about it, so for me to come home and be soft and open and not leap to pounce on a problem and come up with an answer and execute it is hard for me — and it’s truly annoying to Leslie. [Laughs] I can imagine! Any time a problem comes up, my thought is ‘Let’s solve this in the next five seconds and move on!’ And Leslie might want to explore the emotional life of some issue and tell me how she’s feeling for a really long time, and I just want to give her five seconds. That’s a big adjustment. This is 40 is also really about parents and children — every one of us is messed up because of our parents, and by the same token we’re great because of our parents. Pete and Debbie both deal with that burden. Whatever you didn’t get from your parents, you want more of from your spouse. So if you feel like you were abandoned, you’re going to be needy. If you feel like your parents were engulfing, you’re going to want to push your spouse away. It’s really hard to fight against that; I find that the imprinting you have when you’re a kid is really difficult to wipe away. Whenever I’m really upset about something it’s always a result of something from the past. But that’s a revelation that you really only have when you’re in your thirties, maybe. I don’t know that I would have really understood it so much when I was 20. Well, people are so busy trying to earn a living they put very little time into understanding themselves. That’s something that happens later in life, and partially what the movie’s about. I find myself embarrassed that I’m still neurotic about things that happened to me as a kid, because my memory’s disappearing so I don’t even remember the incidents, but I remember the neuroses are and they’re not going away. How do you think viewers of a younger generation will react differently to the film? A lot of it depends on what you’re looking for in a movie. Some people go to movies to escape. I like movies that make me think and feel and I don’t necessarily have to feel good the whole time. So I like movies to be as entertaining and hilarious as I can make them, but I’m also trying to stick in your craw a little bit and talk about some tougher ideas. If that’s what you want, I think it’s a movie you’d really enjoy. But if you really want to shut your brain down, then I have other movies that you can rent. [Laughs]
Since Amy Poehler#39;s Parks and Recreation character couldn#39;t make a kiss with Vice President Joe Biden happen, she settled for the next best thing: David Letterman? On Tuesday night#39;s Late Show, the program#39;s host moved a bit closer to the Parks and Recreation star just as he was about to roll a clip from Poehler#39;s sitcom. “Oh, I thought you were going to go in for a kiss,” the comic actress remarked. Then, without missing a beat, Letterman proceeded to grab Poehler by the arm
Screams of elation, excitement — and at one point pure, unadulterated horror — echoed down through the rafters at the Nokia Theater last night as The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Part II premiered to crowd of well-heeled industry guests and legions of Twi-hards, all craning for a glimpse of Kristen Stewart and Robert Pattinson , who were in attendance alongside dozens of their Twilight co-stars. Hollywood suits and fans alike seemed taken with the action-packed Twilight finale, which concludes the billion-dollar film franchise with a polished touch, new faces, a welcome dash of humor, and more than a few fan service moments dedicated to Bella and Edward’s bloodsucking marital bliss. And, proving that Twilight is a universal phenomenon, the premiere drew famous faces as varied as they come: Stevie Nicks , who compared Twilight to Wuthering Heights and Jane Eyre on the red carpet; Terrell Owens, spotted taking pictures with a Breaking Dawn vampire at the after party; Jaleel White, the erstwhile Steve Urkel; and even Weird Al Yankovic. Weird Al! Who’d have guessed he was a Twilight fan? PHOTO GALLERY: Kristen Stewart, Robert Pattinson & More Hit The ‘Breaking Dawn Part 2’ Premiere Breaking Dawn Part II picks up shortly after the gory events of Breaking Dawn Part I , in which franchise heroine Bella Swan (Kristen Stewart), newly wed, gave birth to her half human, half vampire daughter Renesmee. Or, rather: When baby Renesmee clawed her way out of the womb leaving Bella dying, and fast. Enter vampirism: Painful, permanent, but too convenient to turn down in a pinch. The new film opens with Bella’s rebirth as she awakens to undead life with new strength and beauty, a thirst for blood, and a hyperactive sex drive for making eternal love with Edward (Robert Pattinson). And Bella’s not alone; along with her resurrection, the franchise comes alive with renewed energy and a much-needed sense of humor, not to mention – gasp! – changes from the book that lend Breaking Dawn a cinematic drama lacking in Meyer’s final novel. Director Bill Condon, who helmed Breaking Dawn Part I and shot the two final installments concurrently, delivers the ultimate Twilight farewell for fans of Stephenie Meyer’s books and the film adaptation they spawned. Together with series screenwriter Melissa Rosenberg and Meyer herself, a guiding presence on set and in the scripting process, Condon gives the Twilight faithful all the must-see moments they want — and a few they didn’t know they needed. PHOTO GALLERY: Kristen Stewart, Robert Pattinson & More Hit The ‘Breaking Dawn Part 2’ Premiere Suffice to say, in the service of satisfying the fans Condon and Co. have included plenty of canoodling opportunities for Bella and Edward, who are finally sexual equals now that vampire life has balanced out their 100-year age difference. If you thought Breaking Dawn Part I ‘s PG butter-colored honeymoon sex was thrilling, just wait until Bella, powered by a diet of mountain lion blood, shoves Edward onto their bridal bed and becomes entangled in a blur of abstractly unidentifiable arms and thighs and sighs until her brain explodes in orgasmic, butter-colored bliss. Scream level: 8, on a scale of 1 to 10 . And despite being saddled with the trickiest plot development of the film, maybe even the series ( Imprinting: Totally not weird, right? ), Taylor Lautner shows off his comic timing, and his six-pack, both of which he’s clearly been working on these past few films. I dare say Condon pushes the envelope a bit where Lautner is concerned; in one scene the camera leers just so at Lautner’s crotch that the entire audience gets to second base with him just by looking. Scream level: 9 . But where Rosenberg, Meyer, and Condon show they really know their fan base is in the film’s biggest departure from the book. Without spoiling it, I’ll just describe what it sounded like in the theater: Gasps and screams escaped from the fan contingent, crescendoed, and sustained for a good ten minute span. The feeling was contagious, creating a wave of invisible, palpable energy cascading from the balcony to the screen. Scream level: 11 . PHOTO GALLERY: Kristen Stewart, Robert Pattinson & More Hit The ‘Breaking Dawn Part 2’ Premiere At the after party guests danced under the Forks High prom lights, sat in Bella’s red truck, and posed for photos in Bella and Edward’s meadow. Locations from the entire series were replicated in every corner, from the Volturi chambers to the Quileute forests to the flower-lined awning under which Bella and Edward were wed. Bella’s wedding dress stood underneath a giant hanging moon while servers dressed as Volturi brought around canapes; outside, live wolves roamed a cage on display. It was a Twilight fan’s dream, so thoroughly detailed that you wonder how long it’ll take Summit to figure out how to create a Harry Potter -styled Twilight attraction where fans can wander scenes from the films and imagine themselves in Forks, Washington, and keep the screams — and cash — rolling in for years to come. GET MORE TWILIGHT: Taylor Lautner On Jacob And Renesmee’s ‘Breaking Dawn’ May-December Relationship: ‘I Was Worried About It’ Are Breaking Dawn Fans In For ‘Big Shock’ Ending? Breaking Dawn First Images: Bella and Edward Welcome Renesmee, Lautner Insists Imprinting Not Creepy Read up on all things Twilight: Breaking Dawn ! Follow Jen Yamato on Twitter . Follow Movieline on Twitter .