Tag Archives: country

ABC Confounded Stabber Not Right-Winger, Still Exploits ‘Knife Attack That’s Cut Deep Into National Debate Over Faith and Fear’

ABC News sure wanted to paint Michael Enright, the 21-year-old charged with stabbing Muslim cab driver Ahmed Sharif in Manhattan, as a bigoted hate crime perpetrator who is the inevitable result of Islamophobic opposition to the mosque near Ground Zero. And the network didn’t let the facts get in the way of their agenda – though they were confounded by how he “has a baffling profile” since “he volunteers with a church group that promotes peace and understanding” which “actually support[s] putting that Islamic center down here near Ground Zero.” Sighed Diane Sawyer: “Really confounding, the story of that suspect.” Sawyer, who made the incident her top story (CBS ran a short item, Katrina-obsessed NBC skipped it and most other news), led the Thursday World News by imparting great meaning: “This might have been a small story in another time, but it’s touched on a deeper wave of concern because of all the tension over that mosque and cultural center planned near Ground Zero. At the center of the story, a Muslim cab driver, stabbed two days ago.” Reporter Jeremy Hubbard also saw a larger significance as he played off the weapon used: “It is the knife attack that’s cut deep into a national debate over faith and fear.” Hubbard, who at least did acknowledge very few criminal acts are targeted at Muslims, soon relayed the spin of those who see anti-Muslim hate: “The attack, some Muslims are certain, was fueled by what they call fearmongering over the Islamic cultural center and mosque planned for this site near Ground Zero. There are three flash points cited by Muslims across the country where the rage is evident…” Earlier Thursday, on Good Morning America, Hubbard wondered if the stabbing was “proof the rhetoric surrounding the proposed Islamic cultural center and mosque near Ground Zero has created a heightened fear and prejudice against Muslims.?” More on Thursday morning coverage in this post by Scott Whitlock: “ ABC, CBS: Did ‘Heightened Fear and Prejudice’ of Ground Zero Mosque Prompt NYC Violence? ” Monday night: “ ABC Works to Rehabilitate Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf’s Reputation After Pining for George W. Bush ” From the ABC World News of Thursday August 26, transcript provided by the MRC’s Brad Wilmouth: DIANE SAWYER: Good evening. It was a remarkable moment today in the season of headlines about religious tolerance, and what it is to be Muslim in America. This might have been a small story in another time, but it’s touched on a deeper wave of concern because of all the tension over that mosque and cultural center planned near Ground Zero. At the center of the story, a Muslim cab driver, stabbed two days ago. And by his side today, the Mayor of New York. Why? Jeremy Hubbard on the attack and fallout. JEREMY HUBBARD: It is the knife attack that’s cut deep into a national debate over faith and fear. AHMED SHARIF, STABBING VICTIM: I said, “Please, do not kill me, I am very hard worker. I work very hard.” HUBBARD: Ahmed Sharif – who’s driven a cab for 15 years – slashed across the head, neck and shoulders. MICHAEL BLOOMBERG, NEW YORK CITY MAYOR: This should never have happened. Violence and being disrespectful to each other is not part of why America was formed. HUBBARD: The suspect, 21-year-old Michael Enright has a baffling profile. An honors film school student, he volunteers with a church group that promotes peace and understanding. The only clue to possible bias, war journals on him at the time of his arrest. Diaries he filled out during a recent trip to Afghanistan, where he made a college film about U.S. troops serving there. Those journals, police say, talked about Afghans who were ungrateful for the American military presence in their country. Still, the attack, some Muslims are certain, was fueled by what they call fearmongering over the Islamic cultural center and mosque planned for this site near Ground Zero. There are three flash points cited by Muslims across the country where the rage is evident. A radical church in Gainesville, Florida, gaining worldwide attention for its plan to mark September 11 by burning hundreds of copies of the Koran. Then, there’s the mosque in Madera, California, vandalized three times in a week. And Murfreesboro, Tennessee, where hundreds filled city hall, openly hostile over plans for a mega-mosque that some locals  fear will breed terrorists. An ABC news poll last year showed that nearly half of Americans held an unfavorable opinion of Islam, many of them believing the religion encouraged violence. On the other hand, the most recent FBI crime stats show in 2008, there were 123 anti-Islam bias crimes nationwide a number that paled in comparison to at least one other religion [1,055 against Jews]. And even in New York, police say crimes against Muslims are not on the rise, despite what happened to the cabbie who made an appeal for us all to get along. SHARIF: This is the city of all color, races, all religion, everyone will live here side by side peacefully. HUBBARD: There is one other note about that suspected stabber that muddies the water even further. That peace group he volunteered with, they actually support putting that Islamic center down here near Ground Zero where we are tonight. The suspected stabber, by the way, is charged with attempted murder as a hate crime, Diane. SAWYER: Really confounding, the story of that suspect. Thank you, Jeremy Hubbard, reporting from New York tonight.

Read more:
ABC Confounded Stabber Not Right-Winger, Still Exploits ‘Knife Attack That’s Cut Deep Into National Debate Over Faith and Fear’

Glenn Beck Is NOT Martin Luther King Jr.

Aug. 28 is an important day in American history. On that day, 47 years ago, Martin Luther King Jr. delivered his famous I Have a Dream speech at the Lincoln Memorial. His message gave voice to the voiceless and his vision promoted a just, equal, diverse and compassionate country. This Aug. 28, a very different sort of voice will ring out across those famous steps. Beck is not Martin Luther King Jr., and Brave New Foundation has launched a site for people to speak up and stand with Dr. King's vision, and to share what his vision means to you today. This Aug. 28, Beck and Sarah Palin's presence at the Lincoln Memorial reminds us of how much work still needs to be done. The racist, raging and hate-filled tenor of Beck, Palin and the Tea Party movement is in direct contrast to the noble vision spoken by Dr. King. Their outrageous attempts to divide America and to turn us against each other could not stand in starker contrast to King's vision of a shared humanity. The Reverend King once declared that, “Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter.” But we will not be silent on this matter. We will not let Beck and Palin hijack history and continue in their attempts to further harm and disrupt our collective future. During the Civil Rights Movement, the SNCC Freedom Singers adapted an old Labor protest song — “Which Side Are You On?” Forty-seven years ago, when Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. gave his famous I Have A Dream speech, he asked the country which side of history they would be on. This Aug. 28, we're reminded that the question still needs to be answered. added by: TimALoftis

‘Machete’ Cast Thinks Lindsay Lohan’s ‘Gonna Be All Right’

Lohan’s co-stars praise the performance by the actress, who recently left rehab. By Jocelyn Vena, with reporting by Kara Warner Jessica Alba, Danny Trejo and Michelle Rodriguez at the “Machete” premiere Photo: Kevin Winter/ Getty Images Most of the cast of “Machete” was on hand in Los Angeles on Wednesday (August 25) to celebrate the premiere of their B-movie-inspired, Robert Rodriguez-directed flick. But one of the film’s stars was noticeably absent: Lindsay Lohan, who had been released from rehab a day earlier. The young actress’ road to recovery was on the mind of her co-stars. “You know what, I just care about her as a person,” Don Johnson told MTV News on the red carpet. “God bless her and she’s gonna do fine.” That sentiment was mirrored by Danny Trejo, who added, “Get home, girl! You’re gonna be all right. She’s gonna be fine. She knows what to do.” Another one of the flick’s stars, Cheech Marin, wanted to let Lohan know he supports her, and that he hopes this incident will be a catalyst for her getting her life back on track. “I wish her all the best. I mean, she’s a talented young actress,” he said. “Hopefully, she won’t let her personal life overwhelm her professional life … at some point, you gotta be responsible.” Michelle Rodriguez felt that publicly wishing Lindsay the best would not just benefit her former co-star. “I just think everybody should have in mind that when you wish the best for people around you, it only makes your country, your society, your culture better,” she explained. “So I think that we should all just respect the evolutionary paths of people and as much as we possibly can wish for the better, for light.” Earlier in the night, Jessica Alba praised Lohan , saying, “She’s so good in this movie. I can’t wait for people to see [her in] it.” Praise for Lohan’s performance also came from the film’s director. “She’s awesome in the movie. That’s what they’ll see: the actress behind all that paparazzi nonsense that follows her and won’t leave her alone,” Robert Rodriguez said. “They’ll get to see her and say, ‘Oh, that’s why we follow her around.’ ” Related Videos Lindsay Lohan: Crime And Punishment Related Photos ‘Machete’ Premieres In Los Angeles Related Artists Lindsay Lohan

Excerpt from:
‘Machete’ Cast Thinks Lindsay Lohan’s ‘Gonna Be All Right’

CBS Uses Opposition to Ground Zero Mosque to Lecture About ‘America Becoming Islamophobic’

“A CBS News poll out tonight finds that seven of ten [71%] Americans oppose building a mosque two blocks from Ground Zero,” fill-in CBS Evening News anchor Jeff Glor announced Wednesday night, but instead of exploring why most think it’s inappropriate to build there, Glor pivoted to how that and “controversies over new mosques in Wisconsin and Kentucky have led some to question is America becoming Islamophobic, a prejudice against Muslims?” Those “some” started with the wife of the iman behind the Ground Zero mosque, Daisy Khan, who charged on ABC’s This Week, in what is becoming TV’s favorite soundbite of the week: “It’s not even Islamophobia, it’s beyond Islamophobia, it’s hate of Muslims. And we are deeply concerned.” Glor first went to how “police say anti-Islamic sentiment turned violent,” proven by a single New York City incident, as a “21-year-old man is in police custody tonight charged with attempted murder. Police say he attacked a cab driver after asking if he was a Muslim.” Glor warned “that alleged hate crime took place in the shadow of a heated and divisive debate over whether a mosque should be built near Ground Zero.” Highlighting a Time magazine poll which found “46 percent believe the Islamic religion is more likely than other religions to encourage violence against nonbelievers,” Glor wondered: “Why?” Maybe it has something to do with how the terrorists who committed the 9/11 atrocities and others since are Muslim. A university professor answered Glor’s set-up with the obvious: “Incidents like the Times Square Bomber or the Fort Hood gunman certainly should be expected to amplify people’s anxieties.” Monday night: “ ABC Works to Rehabilitate Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf’s Reputation After Pining for George W. Bush .” Sunday: “ Amanpour on One-Sided This Week: ‘Profound Questions About Religious Tolerance and Prejudice in the U.S .’” From the Wednesday, August 25 CBS Evening News, transcript provided by the MRC’s Brad Wilmouth: JEFF GLOR: In this country, it’s become the subject of a red-hot national debate, those plans to build an Islamic center, including a mosque, two blocks from Ground Zero. A CBS News poll out tonight finds that seven of ten Americans oppose building a mosque there. Our poll also found only 24 percent of Americans have a favorable impression of Islam, 39 percent unfavorable. Supporters of the Islamic center gathered near Ground Zero again today, but, in a different part of Manhattan last night, police say anti-Islamic sentiment turned violent. In New York City, this 21-year-old man is in police custody tonight charged with attempted murder. Police say he attacked a cab driver after asking if he was a Muslim. RAYMOND KELLY, NYPD COMMISSIONER: He said, “Asalaam Alaikum,” and then began to stab the driver. GLOR: That alleged hate crime took place in the shadow of a heated and divisive debate over whether a mosque should be built near Ground Zero. It’s not just protesting near Ground Zero –  the sentiment against building new mosques has reached from New York’s Staten Island 15 miles away to Tennessee where a debate over a proposed mosque near Nashville has raged all summer. UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: It’s not about religion, it’s about stopping Tennessee homegrown terrorists. GLOR: Other controversies over new mosques in Wisconsin and Kentucky have led some to question is America becoming Islamophobic, a prejudice against Muslims? DAISY KHAN, ON ABC’S THIS WEEK: It’s not even Islamophobia, it’s beyond Islamophobia, it’s hate of Muslims. And we are deeply concerned. GLOR: A recent Time magazine poll found that 43 percent of Americans hold unfavorable views of Muslims, and 46 percent believe the Islamic religion is more likely than other religions to encourage violence against nonbelievers. Why? RICHARD LLOYD, VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY: Incidents like the Times Square Bomber or the Fort Hood gunman certainly should be expected to amplify people’s anxieties. GLOR: In this election season, politics is driving the argument as well. NEWT GINGRICH, FORMER HOUSE SPEAKER: Nazis don’t have the right to put up a sign next to the Holocaust Museum. GLOR: It’s become a wedge issue in campaigns from North Carolina to New York. RICK LAZIO, NEW YORK REPUBLICAN GUBERNATORIAL CANDIDATE, IN AD: We don’t need silence now, we need leadership. GLOR: But with nearly seven million Muslims and more than 1,200 mosques already in America, Muslim leaders say that fear is unnecessary. MOHAMMAD SHAMSI ALI, ISLAMIC CULTURAL CENTER: I’m very sad because we know that America is the most tolerant country in the world. GLOR: In New York, many 9/11 families insist their opposition doesn’t make them Islamophobic, they’re just trying to heal. KEN FAIRBEN, FATHER OF 9/11 VICTIM: I feel strongly about it. The mosque, I understand their religious beliefs, I understand they should have a place to pray, an educational center. I have no problems with that whatsoever. But not there. Definitely not there. GLOR: A city commission gave final approval to the Islamic center and mosque earlier this month. Opponents vow to continue their fight in court.

Read more:
CBS Uses Opposition to Ground Zero Mosque to Lecture About ‘America Becoming Islamophobic’

Mosque Controversy- Boyd’s Local Holy War Continues

No matter which religions are fighting, Boyd loves his country. added by: Progresshiv

‘Breaking Dawn’ Brazil Shoot Possibly Hampered By Local Violence

‘We are continuing to scout locations within the country,’ a Summit rep says. By Mawuse Ziegbe “Twilight” stars Robert Pattinson, Kristen Stewart and Taylor Lautner Photo: John Gress/ Getty Images Plans to shoot scenes from the second half of “Breaking Dawn” — the final installment in the “Twilight” series — in Brazil may have hit a snag as a result of violence in the country. According to Agence France-Presse, Summit Entertainment, the production company behind the hit vampire series, planned to begin shooting in Rio de Janeiro within the next few weeks. However, due to a situation in which gang members held 35 guests hostage in the city’s Intercontinental Hotel, and a subsequent shoot-out that left one person dead, the future of the film’s production in Rio has reportedly been jeopardized. RioFilme, a Brazilian film investment agency, said that Summit was discussing the issue with government officials. In a statement to RadarOnline.com , Summit insisted that no decision about abandoning production in the South American nation has been made. “The possibility of filming portions of ‘The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn’ in Brazil has always been under consideration and we are continuing to scout locations within the country,” the company said. However, according to a RioFilme executive, if the smash film series touches down in the country, Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart may not head to Brazil until the fall. “If part of the filming of ‘Dawn’ comes rolling in Rio, will be in November/December. OK?” CEO Sergio Sa Leitao said in a message re-tweeted by the agency’s Twitter account. “And nothing more can be said until we close.” Summit announced in June that “Breaking Dawn” would be divided into two parts. The first of the two films is scheduled to hit theaters on November 18, 2011. Check out everything we’ve got on “The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn – Pt. 1.” For young Hollywood news, fashion and “Twilight” updates around the clock, visit HollywoodCrush.MTV.com . Related Videos ‘Twilight’ Stars Talk ‘Breaking Dawn’

Visit link:
‘Breaking Dawn’ Brazil Shoot Possibly Hampered By Local Violence

Mika on ‘Morning Joe’: If Obama Can Run a Beer Summit, He Can Work to Unite Two Sides of Mosque Debate

Picking up where she left off last week, MSNBC “Morning Joe” co-host Mika Brzezinski on Tuesday and Wednesday cast opponents of the Ground Zero mosque as a “destructive” force, “demonizing” Muslims and “promoting ignorance.” Yet Brzezinski advocated Wednesday for a compromise between the two sides to be spearheaded by President Obama. When Joe Scarborough opined that President Obama, along with former presidents, needs to get involved in a compromise, Mika blurted out that “if [Obama] can have a summit in Boston between a professor and a cop, I think he can do this.” MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” panels largely supported the proposed Ground Zero mosque on both Tuesday and Wednesday, although they did show sympathy toward families of 9/11 victims. But the talking heads still would not give full credence to opponents of the mosque. Perhaps the climax of the struggle came toward the end of Tuesday’s 7 a.m. hour, where Mika faced off against the vice president of America’s 9/11 Foundation, Nick Leischen. After Leischen, speaking for the families of 9/11 victims whom he represents , said that the mosque within sight of Ground Zero would be an affront to grieving persons returning to the site, Mika unleashed her tirade. “When you talk about, every year, on the anniversary of 9/11, people going down there and then perhaps having to look at this center, and be so reminded – what are you talking about?” Mika asked in shock.  “What are they being reminded of? Are you kidding me? It’s an Islamic cultural center.” “You’re now – what you’re doing, and very politely and respectfully, but what you’re doing is, I think, promulgating ignorance about who these people are and what their center is, and demonizing them,” Mika tersely admonished the guest. Not to be left out of the fray, Time magazine’s Mark Halperin also questioned Leischen’s arguments. When the guest brought up Islamic history as a support for his argument, Halperin asked him to leave history out of the debate and consider the people who are involved in the mosque’s planning. “When you say looking at the building would be some sort of horror for them, try to enunciate what that means,” Halperin told Leischen, “because again, as Mika suggested, the only way that that should trouble people is if they’re making a connection between the Islamic faith and what happened on 9/11. Otherwise I don’t see where the pain comes from.” A transcript of selected quotes from Wednesday’s”Morning Joe,” as well as Tuesday’s debate between Mika Brzezinski’s and Nick Leischen, is as follows: MORNING JOE 8/24/10 7:44 a.m. EDT MIKA BRZEZINSKI: And I guess what I see is potentially so different than what you see, and that is for the good of our society and for the good of our relationships between communities, I can’t imagine it being moved now. Why would you think it actually does need to be moved? NICK LEISCHEN: Well it hasn’t been too good for our country and our relationship so far, in fact, quite to the contrary. I’ve got to tell you, I’m not a vociferous opponent by any means, and I’m here representing America’s 9/11 foundation. We have an opinion, and that opinion is just that the location of the proposed mosque is extremely inappropriate. We’re well-based in our opinion, because we’re in contact with so many of the survivors of the World Trade Center, and with other 9/11 sites, and with their family members, the survivors, and with the first responders, especially. And I can tell you that the amount of anguish and pain, and the agonizing difficulty that this has created for them – it hasn’t been a good thing. And I don’t believe that it will continue to be a good thing. And we could have, you know, we could have taken the low road. We could have gone politically correct, and said, you know, “No comment.” Because we are not a political organization, and I am not here to join America’s 9/11 Foundation into the fray. We exist primarily to honor the memory and the sacrifices of the victims, and their families, and the survivors of 9/11, and not just the World Trade Center, but the Pentagon and in Shanksville, Pa. BRZEZINSKI: And with due respect and sympathy to the families and family members of victims and survivors, I just, I do – LEISCHEN: But beyond that, our mission has gotten to be, to a great deal of support to first responders. BRZEZINSKI: And first responders, for sure. And I completely – look, my first reaction when I first heard the headline to the story was “Ooh, wow, is this the right thing?” But with further looking at it, knowing that there is a mosque at the Pentagon, knowing that there is another Islamic center 12 blocks away, knowing what else is around Ground Zero, hearing the conversation, and then listening to it being ratcheted up politically, and on the streets of New York – I just wonder now, though, if it would actually be detrimental to turn back. LEISCHEN: Well, the thing is is that, you know, life is full of compromises, and certainly corporations, religious foundations, charitable foundations – we make compromises all the time to, you know, reach our ultimate goals. So I guess the question is, what really is the goal of the mosque people? I mean, is the goal to create a tribute there to , you know, what happened? I hope not. Or is the goal to create a place of worship, and a community center, and to honor and respect people – BRZEZINSKI: Well that’s the goal. I mean, that’s – from everything we’ve heard, sir, with all due respect, that – that is the goal. The goal is not – LEISCHEN: Why is it so critical to place it virtually right on top of the World Trade Center site? BRZEZINSKI: I honestly, from talking and listening to the people who planning this, and knowing the Imam and having interviewed him – I truly believe, and I could be wrong – but I believe that they were blindsided by the response, because they have another center 12 blocks away, the Pentagon has a – LEISCHEN: I think 12 blocks away would make all the difference in the world. I think that having it within the site of the World Trade Center – imagine every year, on the anniversary, when the family members and the survivors who narrowly escaped with their lives come back to the World Trade Center for the annual memorial, and they’re looking at this 13-story grand monument. How would that feel, how painful would that be? How painful is it now? The people who were at the protest – many of them were family members of the victims. The pain that they were suffering was so great, so extreme, it was very difficult to witness or to speak with them. And by the way, I want to to set the record straight about something. I am not a protester. Certainly, America’s 9/11 Foundation is not protesting. We were down there, but we were down there for an event that is an annual event for us that had been planned more than a year in advance, and we had, oh, I don’t know, 5-600 American patriot motorcyclists that came down there and we did put on an event over by the Pass station, and we very carefully and skillfully, using these wonderful motorcycle police escorts from around the country, and we moved our people around the protest so that we would not draw any media attention, or draw attention to ourselves, or that we would be misconstrued to be protesters. But then I heard media outlets that were building us up to be protesters. We polled our riders, and they are definitely opposed to the location. BRZEZINSKI: Nick, though, the question I have, and I’ll let Mark Halperin in in just a second. When you talk about, every year, on the anniversary of 9/11, people going down there and then perhaps having to look at this center, and be so reminded – what are you talking about? What are they being reminded of? Are you kidding me? It’s an Islamic cultural center. You’re now – what you’re doing, and very politely and respectfully, but what you’re doing is, I think, promulgating ignorance about who these people are and what their center is, and demonizing them. LEISCHEN: Well, it sounds like you’re trying to draw me into the controversy. The only thing I can say in response is this. Let’s look to Cordoba, Spain. When people look at the mosque there, what does it symbolize? BRZEZINSKI: It’s not what we’re looking at down near the site of 9/11, not even close. LEISCHEN: It very clearly symbolizes, you know, an Islamic victory that was held in great esteem for a very long time, and that was marked and monumented by the building of a large mosque on the site that used to be a church, where a massacre occurred. I think there’s a very unhealthy parallel there, and it frightens me. BRZEZINSKI: Whoa. LEISCHEN: I think that if they really wanted to be moderate, and if they were considerate about what’s most important here, it is the respect for the people that are most directly impacted by 9/11. I think that’s what’s important. I’m not talking about a Constitutional right. (…) MARK HALPERIN: When you say looking at the building would be some sort of horror for them, try to enunciate what that means, because again, as Mika suggested, the only way that that should trouble people is if they’re making a connection between the Islamic faith and what happened on 9/11. Otherwise I don’t see where the pain comes from.   MORNING JOE 7/25/10 6:49 a.m.-6:52 a.m. EDT JOE SCARBOROUGH: This is why the President needs to get involved. And I do believe that with the President involved, George W. Bush involved, George H. W. Bush involved – BRZEZINSKI: If he can have a summit in Boston between a professor and a cop, I think he can do this. JOE SCARBOROUGH: This can be resolved. I’m going to say also – and Pat, a week ago – I would have said that compromise needs to include the possibility of moving the mosque north. I’ve got to say at this point, I don’t see how that can happen when you’ve got African-Americans being threatened down at a protest because they quote, “look Muslim.” When you have the nation listening to Newt Gingrich, comparing a house of worship to a swastika. We’ll be seen around the globe as the United States bowing to the pressure of an extreme fringe element. (…) BUCHANAN: In the Islamic world, there are Islamic leaders who are saying “What are these guys thinking of putting it there? There are people over there who are saying “America is anti-Islam,” at the same time (unintelligible). Joe, you won’t find Saudis, in my judgment, or anybody of the Gulf Arabs funding this thing when they realize the sensitivity it has for Americans, and the division that’s associated with it, they’re going to back off. I don’t think it’s ever going to be built. SCARBOROUGH: Okay. We shall see. I am always – I am Pollyanna, I believe there’s a way to bring people together and make this thing happen in a way that makes –

Go here to see the original:
Mika on ‘Morning Joe’: If Obama Can Run a Beer Summit, He Can Work to Unite Two Sides of Mosque Debate

Bozell Column: The Real Radio Hatemongers

Last week, Dr. Laura Schlessinger announced on CNN that she was hanging up her headphones at the end of the year. If she could not exercise her freedom of speech, she said, she was not interested in the job. Watchdogs on the left had pounced on a conversation she had with a black woman in which she proclaimed something that everyone with cable TV knows is true. The N-word is acceptable vernacular for black comedians on HBO, but it’s not something you can ever, ever say if you’re not black. While making this point, Dr. Laura purposely said the N-word repeatedly during this proclamation, and that was all the Left needed to start contacting sponsors, suggesting they shouldn’t want their products associated with this viciously racist talk show. It didn’t matter that even liberal editorialists in The Washington Post declared that there was nothing at all racist in what the doctor said. The Left had found their to chance to silence her, and they pounced. All they needed to do was distort the context completely, and they did so masterfully. The hypocrites.  Leftists say outrageous things on the radio routinely, things they truly mean, too, and those remarks never see the light of day on ABC, CBS, and NBC. Talking about the N-word is wrong but wishing death on political enemies is okay when the rhetorical bombs are dropped on conservatives. The Media Research Center has a new report chronicling who the real radio hatemongers are. Start with Ed Schultz, perpetually out of control on MSNBC. On June 16, 2009, Joe Scarborough asked Schultz if he felt Dick Cheney hoped Americans would die in a terrorist attack so it would benefit Republicans. “Absolutely, absolutely,” said Schultz. “I think Dick Cheney is all about seeing this country go conservative on a hard-right wing and I think he’ll do anything to get it there.” On the radio on August 11, 2009, Schultz spewed: “Sometimes I think they want Obama to get shot. I do. I think that there are conservative broadcasters in this country who would love to see Obama taken out.” This might be what they call projection coming from Schultz, since he begged for Cheney to die. “Lord, take him to the Promised Land,” he proclaimed on May 11, 2009. Or take Montel Williams, the former TV talk show host who had a brief tenure on Air America radio before it imploded. On July 21, 2009, he explained what conservatives had planned for uninsured Americans: “When they show up at the emergency room, just shoot ‘em! Kill them!…Do we have enough body bags? I don’t know.” Reporters scream in protest over anyone calling Obama a socialist but they don’t find anything scandalous in vicious lies like these. Randi Rhodes aired a February 2008 radio skit where she bizarrely imagined the Mitt Romney campaign saying they would go on a shooting rampage and commit mass suicide if John McCain won the GOP nomination. She had one Republican claim: “As a true Republican, I’m prepared to poison my own children if John McCain is the nominee.” Left-wing radio hosts even blame their conservative counterparts for 9/11. I’m not kidding. Mike Malloy shouted at his opponents on January 19, 2010: “Do you not understand that the people you hold up as heroes bombed your goddamn country? Do you not understand that Glenn Beck and Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh and Bill O’Reilly are as complicit of the September 11, 2001 terror attack as any one of the dumbass 15 who came from Saudi Arabia?” Has any conservative ever said anything remotely similar to this? He also claimed on April 19, 2010 that Beck and Limbaugh rejoiced over the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995: “This is what Beck and Limbaugh and the rest of these right-wing freaks want to see happen again. And again. And again. Endlessly.” Perhaps Malloy is granted an exception because he sounds clinically insane. He has claimed Rep. Michele Bachmann “would have gladly rounded up the Jews in Germany and shipped them off to death camps.” He has claimed Cheney “must have feasted on a Jewish baby, or a Muslim baby.” He has claimed that the mild-mannered Fred Barnes “is beyond crazy. I’m sure he eats children’s arms or legs for afternoon snacks.” Then consider this: Mike Malloy was a news writer for CNN for years. Ed Schultz was awarded a platform on MSNBC for his hatred. Those supposed guardians of civility in our liberal media are not bowing their heads in embarrassment. They are nodding their heads in agreement. 

More:
Bozell Column: The Real Radio Hatemongers

A Day After ABC Highlighted Sarah Palin’s Political ‘Losing Streak,’ Her Candidate Closes in on Stunning Win

A day after highlighting Sarah Palin’s political “losing streak,” Good Morning America’s Jon Karl on Wednesday  acknowledged the stunning turn in Alaska’s Senatorial primary race: “But Joe Miller is a Tea Party candidate who had Sarah Palin’s support. He, now, is ahead.” Karl on Wednedsay didn’t mention anything about the former governor’s “losing streak” ending. Instead, co-host Robin Roberts spun the results as a “GOP family feud.” She also questioned the effectiveness of the grass roots organization, wondering, ” So, is the Tea Party getting stronger?Weaker? ” (Roberts’ evidence was John McCain’s victory in Arizona. However, he, too, was supported by Palin.) On Tuesday, Karl highlighted: “But, lately, Palin’s been on a losing streak. Over the last five weeks, Palin-endorsed candidates have lost in Georgia, Tennessee, Kansas, Colorado and Washington State. Palin’s candidate in Alaska is a hard-line Tea Party conservative.” He also made sure to point out, “Miller has also been known to attract assault weapon-baring weapon supporters at his political rallies.” On Wednesday, Karl acknowledged, “And look at what Sarah Palin tweeted just a little while ago. Clearly giddy about the results so far, she said, ‘Keeping fingers crossed, powder dry, prayers upward.'” A transcript of the August 25 segment, which aired at 7:02am EDT, follows: DAVID MUIR: And this morning, primary shakeup. Sarah Palin and the tea party rally in Alaska. Threatening a long-time senator. But the establishment prevails in Arizona as John McCain cinches another nomination. We have overnight results coming in. 7:01 MUIR: Just coming in, these results from overnight. And a real split decision for the voters. ROBIN ROBERTS: Yeah. And we’re also seeing that it’s being described as a GOP family feud , looking at the results. As Republicans fight over Sarah Palin’s Tea Party candidates. And nothing highlights the internal battle more than Tuesday’s primary in Alaska where the Tea Party support led to a stunningly tight race. But, in Arizona, you see, anti-Tea Party sentiment led to a sweeping loss. So, is the Tea Party getting stronger? Weaker? We’re going to take a closer look. 7:02 ROBERTS: But, we begin with results in Tuesday’s key primaries. In Alaska, Lisa Murkowski struggled to keep her job in a tight race with Tea Party candidate Joe Miller. Backed by Sarah Palin, he was. In Arizona, Senator John McCain easily won renomination against another tea party candidate, J.D. Hayworth. And in a Democratic race in Florida, Representative Kendrick Meek beat newcomer Jeff Greene. So, what does it all mean? Well, senior congressional correspondent Jonathan Karl joins us now with more from Washington. And, Jon, a lot of eyes still on that race in Alaska this morning. Very tight. KARL: Robin, this is the story of the day. It’s still way too close to call. But we may be witnessing a colossal upset in the making. Lisa Murkowski is a member of the Republican leadership in the Senate. She was supported by virtually the entire Republican establishment. Had way more money. But Joe Miller is a Tea Party candidate who had Sarah Palin’s support. He, now, is ahead. But this may take weeks to actually count. And look at what Sarah Palin tweeted just a little while ago. Clearly giddy about the results so far, she said, “Keeping fingers crossed, powder dry, prayers upward. But Joe Miller just tweeted, ‘What’s moose hunting like inside the beltway?'” ROBERTS: Stay tuned. All right. That’s the situation right now in Alaska. In Arizona, no real surprise that John McCain was renominated. Though he had to spend $21 million in this campaign, which is more than all of his previous Senate races combined, going back to 1986. But the real surprise here is Ben Quayle, the son of Dan Quayle, going for a congressional seat. And he was very aggressive in his ad campaign. Take a look, Jon. BEN QUAYLE: Barack Obama is the worst president in history. ROBERTS: Very strong tactics that seemed to work, Jon. KARL: It sure did. He was really behind going into this. And he was attacked for allegedly contributing to a pornographic website. But the other thing in that race, Robin, is that his parents, Dan and Marilyn Quayle, in the home stretch, came to his aid. Sending out letters to supporters. Defending his honor. Defending his integrity. ROBERTS: Yeah. They were hot under the collar about that. All right. One more race to talk about. Down in Florida, surprises there, too, Jon. KARL: Yeah. And the big thing there is you had Kendrick Meek, Democratic congressman, decisively win the nomination to run for Senate, beating back a multimillionaire named Jeff Greene, who had vastly outspent him. But, now, you’re going to see one of the marquee, most important, toughest, expensive Senate races in the country, in Florida, that will pit Meek, against Republican Marco Rubio, and former Republican, now independent, Governor Charlie Crist. That’s going to be a big race.

See the original post here:
A Day After ABC Highlighted Sarah Palin’s Political ‘Losing Streak,’ Her Candidate Closes in on Stunning Win

NYT Accuses Mosque Protesters of Fomenting Muslim Extremism, Reveals Own Manhattan-Centric Snobbery

Still more slanted coverage in the New York Times of the controversy over a proposed mosque at Ground Zero: First in Saturday’s story by intelligence reporter Scott Shane, fretting that public opposition voiced to the speedy approval and building of a giant Islamic cultural center topped by a mosque two blocks from Ground Zero would somehow make radical Muslim extremists, who despise the very existence of America, hate the U.S. even more: ” Anti-Islam Protest in U.S. Bolsters Extremists, Experts Say ” (Note: This article was compiled from three separate articles prepared for Times Watch ). Some counterterrorism experts say the anti-Muslim sentiment that has saturated the airwaves and blogs in the debate over plans for an Islamic center near ground zero in Lower Manhattan is playing into the hands of extremists by bolstering their claims that the United States is hostile to Islam. Opposition to the center by prominent politicians and other public figures in the United States has been covered extensively by the news media in Muslim countries. At a time of concern about radicalization of young Muslims in the West, it risks adding new fuel to Al Qaeda’s claim that Islam is under attack by the West and must be defended with violence, some specialists on Islamic militancy say. For confirmation of his slanted premise, Shane went to an unlabeled center-left policy group, New America Foundation. “I know people in this debate don’t intend it, but there are consequences for these kinds of remarks,” said Brian Fishman, who studies terrorism for the New America Foundation here. He said that Anwar al-Awlaki, an American-born cleric hiding in Yemen who has been linked to several terrorist plots, has been arguing for months in Web speeches and in a new Qaeda magazine that American Muslims face a dark future of ever-worsening discrimination and vilification. “When the rhetoric is so inflammatory that it serves the interests of a jihadi recruiter like Awlaki, politicians need to be called on it,” Mr. Fishman said. Shane even suggested former House Speaker Newt Gingrich was fomenting radicalism with his opposition to the mosque: Mr. Gingrich, the former House speaker and a potential 2012 presidential candidate, said in a Fox News interview that “Nazis don’t have the right to put up a sign next to the Holocaust museum in Washington,” a comment that drew criticism for appearing to equate those proposing the Islamic center with Nazis. Asked about the view that such remarks could fuel radicalism , Mr. Gingrich sent an e-mail response on Friday that did not directly address his critics but said that “Americans must learn to tell the truth about radical Islamists while being supportive of and inclusive of moderate Muslims who live in the modern world, respect women’s rights, reject medieval punishment and defend American laws and the American Constitution.” He added that he believed “it is possible to be a deeply religious Muslim and a patriotic American.” Sigh. What doesn’t “fuel radicalism” these days, in the view of America-bashers? Besides, Gingrich isn’t the only prominent political name to come out against the project — several Democrats have as well. Yet the Times has made only muted acknowledgment of the inconvenient fact that prominent Democrats like New York Gov. David Paterson, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, and former DNC chairman Howard Dean have come out against building the Islamic center so close to ground zero, with Dean calling it “a real affront to the people who lost their lives” on 9-11. Is Democrat Dean also “fueling radicalism”? Besides the knee-jerk fretting over “fueling radicalism,” there’s a healthy dose of Manhattan-centric snobbery in the paper’s attitude toward opponents of the mosque, who obviously have no clue about what’s really going on. About four minutes from the end of an August 19 ” Political Points ” podcast at nytimes.com, reporter Sheryl Gay Stolberg took up discussion of the controversial plan to build a mosque near Ground Zero, explaining how the hicks in the sticks who disapprove of the plan, don’t know what’s going on, unlike sophisticated Manhattanites (who actually may not like it much either). Stolberg: “Here’s another reason for the disconnect. I think, in New York, especially in Manhattan, people realize that Muslims live and work in Lower Manhattan , in the area where they’re seeking to build this mosque and community center, which would also include a fitness center where young people could play basketball or swim or what have you. Out in the country, the news coverage has not been as intense, there are fewer details and it allows for the debate to be reduced to its essence, boiled down to a few words: Mosque at Ground Zero. And those words have become inflammatory around the country and I think the nuances is somewhat lost, frankly.” And a Tuesday column by metro writer Clyde Haberman in support (naturally) of the mosque included this unpleasant nativist sniffing: Obscured in the fog of this culture war are a few New York realities, perhaps not fully appreciated by outsiders like Mr. Gingrich of Georgia or Sarah Palin of Alaska . Two blocks may seem like nothing to a non-New Yorker. But anyone who lives or works in Manhattan knows that this distance can be significant. Two blocks is equivalent to several miles in other cities or in the suburbs. Your dry cleaner moves two blocks, and it’s so long, pal. He’ll never see you again. He might as well have relocated to Yonkers.

Read the original here:
NYT Accuses Mosque Protesters of Fomenting Muslim Extremism, Reveals Own Manhattan-Centric Snobbery