Tag Archives: country

Rudy Giuliani, MSNBC’s Dylan Ratigan Eviscerate Joe Scarborough for Blaming Bush for Oil Spill

Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani (R) and MSNBC anchor Dylan Ratigan on June 17 joined forces to lambaste “Morning Joe” co-host Joe Scarborough for continuing to defend President Barack Obama’s handling of the BP oil spill. Scarborough presented a litany of arguments in Obama’s defense, but Giuliani and Ratigan countered with specific examples of the president’s failed leadership. Regurgitating liberal talking points, Scarborough blamed the crisis on George W. Bush and Dick Cheney. “We hear that we had the technology to stop this,” Scarborough claimed. “In 2002, though, Dick Cheney and his energy task force said, ‘No, we’re not going to take an extra step.'” Giuliani responded with an eviscerating counter punch: “It’s important to know as part of the history of this but the reality is, he’s been president now for 18 months. It’s about time we stopped blaming Bush.” Scarborough thought that the former New York City Mayor would credit Obama for securing from BP a $20 billion victim compensation fund, but instead Giuliani criticized the president. “I say it was a good deal for BP,” retorted Giuliani. “If I can put even a tentative limit on the liabilities, I’ve helped save my company.” “Democrats only wanted $10 billion,” claimed Scarborough. “You can’t say something nice about the president?” “The president has so mishandled this that it will be impossible for me to even describe how horribly handled this was,” argued Giuliani. “BP would be more than willing to give $20 billion to get themselves somewhat off the hook.” When pressed by Scarborough, Giuliani gave a detailed explanation for how he would have handled the crisis differently: First of all, the first thing I would have done is to bring in experts from the industry who are independent source of advice for me…If your father or mother were sick, you would go get a second opinion from an expert doctor. Not from an academician which is what he did. Go ask the question. Has anyone done remediation before? Has anyone done it better than BP? Bring them in. Make them your eyes and ears. Have them watching everything. Maybe they could have gotten the estimate right of the amount of oil that was coming out. It was horrendous. This is a horrible case of malpractice, negligence, gross negligence. They were off by 60 times. That had to infect every wrong judgment you make. Instead of crediting Giuliani for articulating a coherent plan, Scarborough attempted to deflect and politicize the issue, wondering whether the “malpractice” was “shared by both political parties and the entire Washington establishment over 15 years that has allowed oil companies to drill in areas where they have no backup plan if something goes wrong?” Ratigan rushed to Giuliani’s defense, railing against Obama for failing to consult independent industry experts at the beginning of the crisis: I actually completely agree with the mayor which is we can talk all day about the problems but until you actually address the matter of the fact that oil continues to go into the Gulf of Mexico, and there are other ways to deal with it that have not been brought in, or have been brought in too late–that is shameful. When Giuliani took aim at Obama for addressing the oil spill as a political problem, Scarborough jumped to the president’s defense. “It is a political problem,” exclaimed Scarborough. “It’s a substantive problem, but it’s a political problem!” “He’s just dealing with it as a political problem,” countered Giuliani. “That’s why he went down there only a couple of times at the very beginning. Didn’t take charge. We had Gibbs saying for three weeks that BP was in charge. The speech last night, Obama said the federal government’s been in charge from the beginning. Well, nobody ever told anybody that for the first four weeks. Maybe they were in charge in secret.” Scarborough then claimed that Obama took charge early on, making the oil spill the “top priority for this government,” but Ratigan disagreed, proclaiming, “My biggest criticism of this administration which is why I agree with the mayor when it comes to the response is the incredibly incompetent appearance of the containment strategy.” The transcript of the segment can be found below: MSNBC Morning Joe 6/17/10 8:04 a.m. JOE SCARBOROUGH: $20 billion. MIKA BRZEZINSKI: That’s pretty good. RUDY GIULIANI, former New York City mayor: Even nowadays that’s real money. That’s real money. SCARBOROUGH: Let’s give the president– DYLAN RATIGAN: Unless you get it from the Federal Reserve, in which case it’s not real money. SCARBOROUGH: Mr. Mayor, let’s make headlines, let’s give the president credit right now for being able to get $20 billion from BP without a single lawsuit being filed. What do you say? BRZEZINSKI: Come on. SCARBOROUGH: That’s pretty good. GIULIANI: I say it was a good deal for BP. BRZEZINSKI: Why? GIULIANI: Divide it by four or five years. What do they make per year? Jim would know this. JIM CRAMER, CNBC anchor: They make $6 billion per quarter. GIULIANI: If I can put even a tentative limit on the liabilities, I’ve helped save my company. SCARBOROUGH: But they haven’t done that yet. They did not waive liability. GIULIANI: But that’s a pretty good indication of it’s going to be hard to get above that $20 billion. It gets them– SCARBOROUGH: Democrats only wanted $10 billion. You can’t say something nice about the president? BRZEZINSKI: There’s nothing nice here? SCARBOROUGH: You can’t say, “Mr. President, good job of getting $20 billion?” GIULIANI: The president has so mishandled this that it will be impossible for me to even describe how horribly handled this was. SCARBOROUGH: He got $20 billion from people in my backyard. That’s pretty good, isn’t it? GIULIANI: He would have gotten with the same leverage in a second. BP would be more than willing to give $20 billion to get themselves somewhat off the hook. Unfortunately, they stepped all over it with a comment that the CEO made. SCARBOROUGH: What would you have done differently as far as substance goes? GIULIANI: Every single thing from day one. First of all, the first thing I would have done is to bring in experts from the industry who are independent source of advice for me. I met with some of the– SCARBOROUGH: The president didn’t do that? GIULIANI: Two days ago I had dinner in Houston, with several people who were top people in the industry. Never reached out. Never, never asked, gee, has Shell done this before? Has Exxon done this before? If your father or mother were sick, you would go get a second opinion from an expert doctor. Not from an academician which is what he did. Go ask the question. Has anyone done remediation before? Has anyone done it better than BP? Bring them in. Make them your eyes and ears. Have them watching everything. Maybe they could have gotten the estimate right of the amount of oil that was coming out. It was horrendous. This is a horrible case of malpractice, negligence, gross negligence. They were off by 60 times. That had to infect every wrong judgment you make. SCARBOROUGH: Isn’t that malpractice, though, shared by both political parties and entire Washington establishment over 15 years that has allowed oil companies to drill in areas where they have no backup plan if something goes wrong? DYLAN RATIGAN, MSNBC anchor: I’ll do you one better. The American people consume four gallons of gasoline for every gallon of gasoline that exists on the Earth. We have the biggest subsidized cost of energy. We have a false price for energy in our country to this day. The cost of the wars is not in the cost of energy. The environmental liability is not in the cost of the energy. None of the liability associated with our lifestyle is actually priced in. For capitalism to work, you actually have to be paying the actual price that represents the actual cost. So if we were actually paying the real cost of energy, we would be incentivized, believe me, to come up with something else. But because of the government and the culture of political expedience subsidies of energy costs everybody’s happy to take it so we hire BP to the tune of $6 billion a quarter to figure out–which is not easy, by the way–the technology to drop 18,000 feet beneath the ocean surface to suck oil out so we can continue to enjoy our lifestyle. If you ask me whether it’s the obvious failure in the government–MMS is obviously conflicted. Whether it’s the obvious fact that we built a sports car that could basically do anything. They had the technology to go to the bottom of the sea but they didn’t have a braking system, no way to turn it off which is incredibly reckless. And you put it all together. You find yourself in a situation where everybody’s pointing fingers but no one is containing the spill. So I actually completely agree with the mayor which is we can talk all day about the problems but until you actually address the matter of the fact that oil continues to go into the Gulf of Mexico, and there are other ways to deal with it that have not been brought in, or have been brought in too late–that is shameful. SCARBOROUGH: Do you agree that there are because we have been are defending this White House saying on substance for the most part they’ve gotten it right, do you agree with the mayor that actually they haven’t gotten it right? CRAMER: I think the mayor is dead on when he says that if they had known that the spill could be 60,000 barrels, which was available if you talk to the former heads of Exxon or if you talk to Boone Pickens, which you asked me to do. (Inaudible) GIULIANI: And the people in the industry believe that he hasn’t talked to the industry because they’re bad guys. (Inaudible) GILUIANI: A bunch of bad guys. CRAMER: They’re all bad actors. GIULIANI: And from the point of view of crisis management, this is an F. You couldn’t have done it worse. Some day Harvard will do a study on if you have a crisis like this, these are the things that Obama did wrong. Here are the things to do right. I could go on and on; that was the first mistake that he made. The second mistake that he made was to kind of treat this as a political problem. Which he was doing right up until the speech the other night. Treat it as a political problem. SCARBOROUGH: It is a political problem. It’s a substantive problem, but it’s a political problem! GIULIANI: He’s just dealing with it as a political problem. That’s why he went down there only a couple of times at the very beginning. Didn’t take charge. We had Gibbs saying for three weeks that BP was in charge. The speech last night, Obama said the federal government’s been in charge from the beginning. Well, nobody ever told anybody that for the first four weeks. Maybe they were in charge in secret. SCARBOROUGH: Well, the president said himself though on April 22nd. BRZEZINSKI: Yes. I just pulled up that. SCARBOROUGH: On April 22nd he called all the agency heads in and he said, “Okay, listen. This is going to be very bad.” It’s before–it’s before the thing blew out of the water and said this is the top priority for this government. We have to focus on it. This is job number one. RATIGAN: Where is the containment strategy? GIULIANI: That’s worse because if this was job number one look at the horrible–if this is job number one which I don’t think it was because the president was off on vacation twice during all of this, if this were job number one– SCARBOROUGH: Did you go on vacation Mr. Mayor? GIULIANI: Did I go on vacation as mayor? No. SCARBOROUGH: Isn’t that a cheap shot? You never went on vacation? GIULIANI: Not in the middle of a crisis. SCARBOROUGH:  Ronald Reagan went on vacation. George W. Bush went on vacation. GIULIANI: Not in the middle of a crisis. This is the second time the president has done that, and I resent it. On Christmas day when we had Christmas bombing, he was on vacation. Remained on vacation for 11 days. SCARBOROUGH: It was Christmas! GIULIANI: He is the President of the United States of America. SCARBOROUGH: They got microphones in Chicago. GIULIANI: On Christmas evening, the first year that I was the mayor, I left my house and went to the hospital and I spent five hours there because I was the mayor of New York City and I should be on the spot taking charge of something from the very beginning. This has been a gross failure in crisis management. Could not have done it worse. SCARBOROUGH: Okay. I’m sorry. Didn’t mean to–   GIULIANI: : And you shouldn’t be on vacation when a crisis is affecting the country. RATIGAN: There are two problems here. One is the capping of the well which I think is BP’s problem. BP obviously was negligent in the construction of dealing the well. There’s a totally unrelated problem, which is the containment problem. And in order to deal with the containment problem, that is the government’s problem and you have to know what the flow rate is accurately and early in order to have a containment strategy. So my biggest criticism of this administration which is why I agree with the mayor when comes to the response is incredibly incompetent appearance of the containment strategy. SCARBOROUGH: That’s not monday morning quarterbacking? I mean, who knew? RATIGAN: The oil is still coming out, Joe. They could still bring–Matt Simmons knew. T. Boone Pickens knew. Booms, put booms around it. Drop a curtain. Put super tankers in the middle and start sucking the oil out. (Inaudible) RATIGAN: Booms, curtain, super tanker. Super suck technology. Next question. GIULIANI: And actually, Joe, it is worse if you’re right and they were in charge from the beginning because if they were in charge at the beginning they really didn’t know what they were doing. I actually don’t think they were in charge. I think their real failure was they trusted BP. And they shouldn’t have trusted BP but they trusted BP. SCARBOROUGH: And let’s just say that has been our one critique on substance that perhaps they–two things. One, they trusted BP too much from the beginning. Two, they made a political calculation that if “we go down there, we own the story. It’s not BP’s story. It’s our story.” That is a critique I think we’ll hear for some time. And can we go right now? Because this is a fascinating conversation. You’re actually the first person that’s come on this show and when I’ve challenged them give me substance. Actually you three guys, you’re talking specifics about what the president should have done. Let’s go to the barni-cam right now. Mike Barnicle. Is he wearing the white sox right now? Are you listening to this? MIKE BARNICLE, MSNBC contributor: Yeah I am. SCARBOROUGH: We’ve got three guys here that are loaded for bear. And they’ve got some specifics. What do you think?                          BRZEZINSKI: Taking shots. BARNICLE: Let’s place all of our faith in BP because they’ve done such a great job. They’re still using the same instruments on oil spills that they were using in California in 1969. If British Petroleum, which they used to call themselves, or any of these oil companies were in charge of technological advancements in our society we would still be using a rotary phone and looking at a 12-inch Bendix TV set. (Inaudible) SCARBOROUGH: Do we have the cameraman from “24” now? Mike Barnicle brings up a point but let me ask you again in the role of devil’s advocate. We hear that we had the technology to stop this. In 2002, though, Dick Cheney and his energy task force said, “No, we’re not going to take an extra step.” GIULIANI: I have no idea what Dick Cheney did, you know, five or six years ago. SCARBOROUGH: Isn’t that important to know? It’s part of the story. GIULIANI: It’s important to know as part of the history of this but the reality is, he’s been president now for 18 months. It’s about time we stopped blaming Bush. RATIGAN: Hang on, Mr. Mayor. I don’t mean to interrupt you but the North Sea has a totally different set of safety standards–totally different governmental standards. These standards have to be taken into consideration. –Alex Fitzsimmons is a News Analysis intern at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow him on Twitter.

Read the rest here:
Rudy Giuliani, MSNBC’s Dylan Ratigan Eviscerate Joe Scarborough for Blaming Bush for Oil Spill

AP: June Private-Sector Employment May Contract

It seems that when they saw today’s today’s disappointing unemployment claims report from Uncle Sam, the Associated Press’s Alan Zibel, perhaps with the help of contributors Jeannine Aversa, Martin Crutsinger, and Tali Arbel, decided to start playing the expectations game with June’s Employment Situation Report, which isn’t due to arrive from the Bureau of Labor Statistics until July 2. If so, from a propagandist’s perspective, it’s a pretty slick strategy, given that the BLS’s report will probably be the last significant piece of economic news before the July 4 weekend, making it a larger than usual topic of conversation among the American people in the days that follow. Private sector job growth shrank to a seasonally adjusted 20,000 in May. Maybe if the AP and others make us think that June will go negative and the actual result comes in barely positive, it won’t seem so bad. The worse possibility is that they’re aware of more information than the rest of us have, and that things really are heading south in this “Rebound? What Rebound?” recovery . Here are key paragraphs of Zibel’s report (link is probably dynamic and subject to revision; bolds are mine): The number of people filing new claims for jobless benefits jumped last week after three straight declines, another sign that the pace of layoffs has not slowed. Initial claims for jobless benefits rose by 12,000 to a seasonally adjusted 472,000, the Labor Department said Thursday. It was the highest level in a month and overshadowed a report that showed consumer prices remain essentially flat. The rise in jobless claims highlighted concerns about the economic rebound — especially after a report earlier this week said home construction plunged in May after government tax credits expired. If layoffs persist, there’s a concern that the June employment numbers may show a decline in private-sector jobs after five straight months of gains , said Jennifer Lee, an economist with BMO Capital Markets. “We’ve definitely seen the economic recovery hit a wall,” Lee said. … Kevin Logan, an economist with HSBC Securities, said many economists have been expecting claims to fall below 450,000 for several weeks now. “The wait is getting longer and longer,” said Logan. “As each week goes by, doubts about the underlying strength of the economic expansion grow.” It seems suspiciously early for the press to be putting out a jobs-will-be-lost vibe fifteen days out from the actual news. If things really are getting as potentially rough as indicated, the administration’s plan to celebrate a summer of recovery, as detailed today by Politico’s Mike Allen , could turn in to an object of abject ridicule: Vice President Biden today will kick off “Recovery Summer,” a six-week-long push designed to highlight the jobs accompanying a surge in stimulus-funded projects to improve highways, parks, drinking water and other public works. Biden will present President Obama with a report laying out a spike in stimulus activity this summer, and how it will contribute to a steady climb to a total of 3.5 million Recovery Act jobs by the end of the year. Biden, Obama and other administration officials will travel to more than two dozen Recovery Act project sites in coming weeks. Tomorrow, the president will travel to Columbus, Ohio, to mark the groundbreaking of the 10,000th Recovery Act road project, around Nationwide Children’s Hospital. On Monday, Biden will travel to Midland, Mich., for the groundbreaking of the new Dow Kokam advanced battery manufacturing facility. –David Axelrod said: “This summer will be the most active Recovery Act season yet, with thousands of highly-visible road, bridge, water and other infrastructure projects breaking ground across the country, giving the American people a first-hand look at the Recovery Act in their own backyards and making it crystal clear what the cost would have been of doing nothing. … In the face of the greatest economic crisis since the Great Depression, Republicans in Congress chose to play politics with economic recovery and declared the Recovery Act a failure before it even began. They made a cynical bet that if the President fails, they win. Democrats chose to act by tackling the crisis head-on. Just over a year later, the Recovery Act is putting millions of Americans to work and helping the economy grow again. But our work is far from over.” In her perceptive column last week (“The Alien in the White House”), the Wall Street Journal’s Dorothy Rabinowitz wrote the following about Barack Obama and his apparatchiks: The president’s appointees, transmitters of policy, go forth with singular passion week after week, delivering the latest inversion of reality. Their work is not easy … The drivel Politico’s Allen relays proves that Rabinowitz was clearly not exaggerating. Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com .

See original here:
AP: June Private-Sector Employment May Contract

Don’t Just Watch the Disaster in the Gulf Unfold, Do Something to Help

A Brown Pelican covered in oil floats in the Gulf of Mexico. Photo by Julie Dermansky. If you’re like me, you might be getting tired of seeing all the terrible images of the BP oil disaster and not being able to do anything about it. Well the Sierra Club’s got something for you: How about getting your friends and family together to watch our new DVD on the oil spill and discuss how to end our country’s oil addiction?… Read the full story on TreeHugger

Read the original:
Don’t Just Watch the Disaster in the Gulf Unfold, Do Something to Help

World Cup 2010: Rio Ferdinand will not return to South Africa

• Injured England captain to take break with family • ‘Rio is making good early progress from his knee injury’ Rio Ferdinand will not rejoin the England party for the remainder of the country’s World Cup campaign. Ferdinand returned to Manchester on Sunday to have his knee injury assessed having sustained the injury – and been ruled out of the tournament – following a training ground accident with Emile Heskey. He had stayed in Rustenburg to watch England’s first game against the USA last Saturday. It had been thought the 31-year-old would head back South Africa but, having been assessed by Manchester United’s medical staff, it has been decided Ferdinand will take a short break with his family before returning to Carrington for more intensive treatment. “Rio is making good early progress from his knee injury,” United said. “Medical staff have advised a two-week recuperation period with his family before returning to Carrington to complete the rehabilitation process.” Although United have not put a timescale on Ferdinand’s likely return to action, given the two-week break he has now embarked on, there must be a doubt over the defender being part of the club’s summer tour to North America for which they depart on 12 July. There would be more confidence of him being available for the Premier League opener against Newcastle United at Old Trafford on 14 August and England’s friendly with Hungary at Wembley three days before that. Rio Ferdinand England World Cup 2010 Group C World Cup 2010 guardian.co.uk

Read more here:
World Cup 2010: Rio Ferdinand will not return to South Africa

Championship fixtures 2010-11

Full fixture list for the Championship season starting 7 August 2010

See original here:
Championship fixtures 2010-11

David Smith visits Soweto for Youth Day during the World Cup

David Smith visits Soweto for Youth Day during the World Cup for the anniversary of the uprising David Smith Peter Sale

View original post here:
David Smith visits Soweto for Youth Day during the World Cup

World Cup 2010: Algeria aiming to vent their frustrations on England

A disappointing opening loss to Slovenia has Algeria desperate to make amends and Fabio Capello’s team are in the firing line Twenty-four years is an awfully long time to wait for a damp squib. For more than two decades the football-crazy people of Algeria craved another qualification for the World Cup and, once the passage to South Africa was booked, a fever of anticipation spread across virtually the whole country. All of which made for a monumental anticlimax when the Desert Foxes marked their grand return to the global stage last Sunday by slumping to a sorry 1-0 defeat to Slovenia. Against England tomorrow the Algerian team mean to make amends. “It was very disappointing, we were full of regrets after the game,” the Algeria midfielder Karim Matmour says, explaining that what made the defeat by Slovenia all the more agonising was the realisation that the Europeans were eminently beatable. “It was clear that we had a great chance to get off to a good start and we missed the opportunity. But we’ve lifted our heads up and we’ll be 200% determined to atone for that against the English.” • Follow the Guardian’s World Cup team on Twitter • Sign up to play our great Fantasy Football game • Stats centre: Get the lowdown on every player • The latest team-by-team news, features and more In the unlikely event of such talk tormenting Fabio Capello, England’s manager could soothe himself by rewatching Slovenia’s win – or, indeed, any of Algeria’s recent matches – because recently Rabah Saâdane’s team have seemed impotent. In the run-up to the World Cup they scored once in five games – a penalty against the United Arab Emirates – and there was no trace of their attack having grown teeth against Slovenia, when in the whole match they mustered a mere two shots on target. They looked negative but Matmour said it was not a lack of will that constrained them but the lack of an effective way. “We need to refine the way we move forward,” says the 24-year-old, who earns his living at Borussia Mönchengladbach. “The linkages between midfield and attack were where we had the most difficulty. We need to improve.” Algeria’s plan for improving is counterintuitive. Seeking to end a goal drought by playing with no recognised strikers seems strange but that is what they are likely to do against England. Matmour will probably be the man who shifts from midfield to the unfamiliar role of centre-forward. For most of this week he has been rehearsing the role in training, with the 20-year-old Sochaux midfielder Ryad Boudebouz hinting that he may win only his third cap against England by slotting into Matmour’s usual berth on the right-hand side of midfield. “We have tried a few formats in training but, yes, that system is a possibility,” Matmour says cagily. In truth, the manager Saâdane has little alternative but to try such tinkering. The striker who started against Slovenia, Rafik Djebbour, showed that he is so far out of form he may never find his way back while the player who came on for him as a substitute in that match, Abdelkader Ghezzal, got sent off within 15 minutes and will be suspended tomorrow. The only other striker in the squad is the country’s top scorer, Rafik Saïfi, but after an injury-plagued season the 35-year-old is unlikely to start. Matmour is generally viewed as more of a creator than a scorer – he has struck just two goals in his 23 appearances for his country – but the reason he seems set to start up front tomorrow is that Saâdane believes his speed will trouble John Terry and Jamie Carragher. Matmour said he has not asked his Portsmouth-based team-mate, Nadir Belhadj, about any vulnerabilities in the England team that might be exploited because “we all know the English players already because they play for the biggest clubs in the world and we watch them on television every week”. But Belhadj sounds as if he may have offered some tips anyway. The flying left-back did, after all, tell the Algerian magazine Le Buteur this week that “England’s weakness is their defence. It is easy to penetrate.” Matmour is more diplomatic but agrees that England have imperfections. “Although they are deservedly one of the favourites for the tournament and have brilliant individuals in every position, sometimes great individuals don’t make for a great team,” he says. “Some of them don’t seem to be in form and the team maybe lacks cohesion. We respect them, but we know we can do something against them.” Matmour suggests England’s manager may have erred in his preparation, notably by not publicly committing to Robert Green following the goalkeeper’s gaffe against the USA. Green’s Algerian counterpart, Faouzi Chaouchi, blundered against Slovenia but Saâdane quickly announced that there would be no change in goal against England. The coach could, though, be forced into an alteration because Chaouchi has a knee injury which caused him to miss training yesterday. Saâdane is in the habit of dispelling doubts from the minds of outfield players by revealing his starting line-up two days before matches. “Psychologically you need that time to prepare. I wouldn’t like having to wait until the last minute to find out whether I’m playing.” Plainly Matmour does not like doubt. That is why he scoffs at suggestions that Algeria might play for a draw against England in the hope of beating the USA in their last game and, with other results helping them, reaching the second round with four points. “That’s all too complicated,” he snorts. “The England match is a final for us. We’ll be aiming for victory.” • The PUMA Africa Unity kit is the official third strip of Algeria, Cameroon, Ghana and the Ivory Coast. Sales of the shirt raise money for biodiversity causes in Africa Algeria World Cup 2010 Group C World Cup 2010 Paul Doyle guardian.co.uk

Read more from the original source:
World Cup 2010: Algeria aiming to vent their frustrations on England

World Cup 2010: Australia’s Tim Cahill gets one-match ban

• Socceroos midfielder had feared a two-match suspension • Everton player will only miss Ghana game on Saturday Tim Cahill has been reprieved to continue in the World Cup after Fifa decided to show him leniency for the red card that had threatened to end his tournament. Cahill was sent off for a challenge on Bastian Schweinsteiger during Australia’s 4-0 defeat to Germany in Durban on Sunday. The Everton player broke down in tears after the match, believing it would mean a two-match ban that would rule him out of the rest of Australia’s group matches. Instead Fifa’s disciplinary panel have decided the offence merited only a one-game suspension, meaning Cahill will be unavailable for the game against Ghana on Saturday but can play against Serbia next Wednesday. Australia World Cup 2010 Group D World Cup 2010 Daniel Taylor guardian.co.uk

Link:
World Cup 2010: Australia’s Tim Cahill gets one-match ban

The Fiver | Footballing Rod Hulls; and An Adequately Resourced Pele Museum | Paul Doyle and Barney Ronay

Click here to have the Fiver delivered direct to your inbox every weekday at 12pm(ish), or if your usual copy has stopped arriving SWISS OF LIFE Phew! It’s a good thing that celebrated, squat, slightly penguin-shaped pillar of moral rectitiude, Sepp Blatter, was at Durban Stadium yesterday. Because if Above-Board Blatter hadn’t been personally supervising events, many folks might have suspected that jiggerypokery was responsible for the defeat of seemingly invincible Spain by Switzerland, the country of Above-Board’s birth and home to Fifa HQ. How else, such folks might have asked, to explain that a side universally hailed as the best in the world could be beaten by a team who began their qualifying campaign by losing at home to Luxembourg? How else could a free-scoring machine that went into the match having won 19,754 consecutive matches be shut out by a defence led by Philippe Senderos? Ottmar Hitzfeld knows how else. “We concentrated and were organised from the start,” yodled the manager whom the Swiss now worship as Gottmar. “We didn’t allow any chances for Spain in the first half and that gave us self-confidence. In the second half, Spain rolled one attack after another and we knew they would open their defence. After we took the lead, we gained even more confidence.” Simple, see? Especially as Spain could not adapt their approach to overcome Hitzfeld’s tactics, suggesting, perhaps, that the most feted team on the planet are mere one-trick ponies, nothing more than footballing Rod Hulls. Or, if you prefer, the international equivalent of Arsenal or Barcelona. Spain manager Vicente Del Bosque thinks otherwise. That, of course, confirms they are the international equivalent of Arsenal. ”I feel [the win] is an excessive prize for them considering the football they displayed,” harrumphed Del Bosque in tones familiar to anyone used to hearing Arsene Wenger suggest that any defeat for his team means not that there is something wrong with that team, but that there is something wrong with football itself. SIGN UP FOR OUR FANTASY FOOTBALL GAME You can still sign up now and play daily competitions with the most exciting fantasy game on the web (oh, it’s free too) . QUOTE OF THE DAY “How did you manage to muck it up?” – Telecinco touchline reporter Sara Carbonero, Spain’s very own version of Nick Collins, asks the question on everybody’s minds to Iker Casillas – her other half – after yesterday’s game. LIVE ON GUARDIAN.CO.UK TODAY Join Paul Doyle for MBM coverage of Argentina 1-1 South Korea at 12.30pm, Barney Ronay for Greece 0-1 Nigeria at 3pm and Barry Glendenning for France 1-1 Mexico from 7.30pm . GAUCHO GARDEN GNOME The Fiver is astonished to detect, sifting through its daily media monitor portfolio of yellowing free-sheet newspapers, eavesdropped stairwell conversations and the Text Maniacs section of the Daily Star, a sense out there that this might, in fact, be quite a boring World Cup so far. Not enough goals they say. Where’s the drama, they ask. WOT U MUPPET WENGA NO WAY FERGIE LOL WC INNIT SORT IT AWT, they rage. This is all news to the Fiver, for whom the World Cup has so far been an intoxicating ride, a feast of the senses, a palm-drenchingly humid sensory journey of sounds and smells – and particularly smells, given that the Fiver has observed the entire tournament from its prime vantage point in the inside suit jacket pocket of Diego Maradona, previously a star of the World Cup, and currently shaping up as its saviour from the sidelines. Not content with capering wildly, with performing furiously sweaty touchline man-hugs, with roughing up his players, and with appearing in public displaying a peculiar gaucho garden gnome facial hair arrangement, Maradona has now decided to enter into a full-combat joint comedy roast of two of his fellow old-style WC hall-of-famers, the invariably wrong Pele and the invariably sniffy Michel Platini, incumbent Uefa chief blazer and outspoken critic of all things non-Michel Platini. “Pele should go back to the museum,” Maradona opined at yesterday’s knockabout press session, responding to criticism of his “coaching” “style” by the man who once attempted to defeat a crack Nazi XI with a selection that included Sylvester Stallone in goal and the aged Michael Caine in a kind of strolling EBJT role. And to be fair to Maradona this isn’t actually a bad idea. The Fiver would be among the first to visit a properly kitted out, adequately resourced Pele museum, with its Pele waxwork hall, its stuffed and cured Pele exhibit, its Pele fossils and interactive Pele experience with the sounds and smells of Pele through the ages, not to mention its Pele gift shop crammed with Pele lavender biscuits and bracing Pele throat lozenges. Platini, meanwhile, thinks he “is better than all the rest”. “I’ve always had a very distant relationship with him, it’s always just hello and goodbye, nothing more than that,” Maradona shrugged, producing a sheathe of unanswered RSVP invitations to a cigar-smoking, burger-cramming, shark-fishing speedboat expedition in Cuban territorial waters. He also had a pop at the ball, fingering it for the dearth of non-Maradona-related thrills. “I’m having a wonderful time, to me a World Cup is something that’s quite amazing,” he gurgled, taking the first steps in a small, capering improvised dance and balancing a goldfish bowl on his nose. “I don’t want to go into the ball again because everyone is talking about it, but it is important and it does play a part and I would ask Pelé and Platini to go out there and play with the ball and take a closer look at it to see if it’s a good one or bad one, and to stop talking rubbish about me.” Which is something the Fiver, for one, would be willing to pay a lot of money to witness, in a kind of blazered, sweating, ankle-hacking middle-aged great dream three-and-in tournament sense. As for the rubbish-talking, keep it coming. Right now it’s pretty much all we’ve got. WIN! WIN! WIN! Enter our ridiculously easy competition and you could win a shirt signed by one of the World Cup’s biggest names. Is it Maxim Kalinichenko? Wouldn’t you like to know. £66 HAT-TRICK OF FREE BETS WITH BLUE SQUARE Click here to find out more. FIVER LETTERS “It may have taken longer than originally anticipated, but kudos to the Fiver. The World Cup in South Africa proves that the Stop Football campaign has indeed succeeded beyond anyone’s wildest dreams” – Central Park Rangers. “I’m no expert but surely fans attacking power distribution centres to protest against power outages during World Cup games (yesterday’s bits and bobs) is not going to help” – Ian Manning. “Re: Robbie Earle asking for tickets to a match being played in a city he doesn’t live in, between two countries he doesn’t come from (yesterday’s Fiver). Surely it worked in the past for Jamaica matches?” – Gareth Deeble. Send your letters to the.boss@guardian.co.uk . And if you’ve nothing better to do you can also tweet the Fiver now. BITS AND BOBS The fixtures for The Best Tournament In The World That Sky Does Have Rights To have been announced and Liverpool will host Arsenal on the opening day of the season. Click here for the fixtures from across the leagues . World Cup chief Danny Jordaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaan hopes South Africans will retain an interest in the competition when … sorry, if the hosts crash out, following their defeat to Uruguay. “[The fans] were dragged along in silence and pain, not a sound from the vuvuzela,” he said a tad dramatically. “What is important now is that the fans embrace the tournament beyond the Bafana team.” Fifa has handed Tim Cahill just a one-game ban for his red card during the Sheilaroos’ opening defeat to Germany. Chris Evans, the man who spawned TFI Friday and is therefore directly responsible for James C****n’s World Cup Live, has apologised for posting a joke about poverty in Africa and the World Cup on Twitter. “Apologies for last retweet didn’t read it properly,” he said. “Never meant to offend. Not funny at all.” A frozen pitch caused Ghana’s training session to be postponed by two hours today. “We were informed early this morning that we had to reschedule training due to the freezing conditions,” chattered a chilly Ghana FA suit. Darlington boss Simon Davey has quit the club, handing in his resignation to the Conference club via email. “I’m off XOXO,” he didn’t write, while Stockport boss Gary Ablett has also left his position. And Peter Andre has somehow, somehow prised the Celebrity Dad of the Year title away from England’s Brave John Terry. Wayne Rooney was ninth and $tevie Mbe 10th, both finishing behind Ronan Keating. Hmm … THE FIVER FANS’ NETWORK: HAVE YOUR SAY! In the spirit of mutualisation (ie this and this and this ), we’re offering this space to one Fiver reader a day to have their say on whether or not it’s a good idea to let football fans have their say. Here’s Phil West: “Better for a football fan to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to have their say and remove all doubt.” Send your efforts – in 140 characters or less – to the.boss@guardian.co.uk with ‘My say on people having their say’ in the subject heading and we’ll publish … something. STILL WANT MORE? Jonathan Wilson is so obsessed with tactics that he thought the Jackson 5 were an experimental defensive formation. So listen up when he says attacking full-backs could be vital at the World Cup . James Richardson and his pod chums discuss Spain’s defeat and today’s fixtures on the latest edition of Football Weekly World Cup Daily . Rob Smyth is a registered tacticphile himself and has pored over Opta’s stats to tell you why the World Cup has been a little on the flat side so far . Finally 44 years of hurt are over: an article about 1966 without one mention of England. Richard Williams says the current North Korea side could emulate their illustrious predecessors . And Fabio Capello has got all sorts of problems ahead of the England-Algeria game: our writers have put their heads together to try to solve them . SIGN UP TO THE FIVER Want your very own copy of our free tea-timely(ish) email sent direct to your inbox? Has your regular copy stopped arriving? Click here to sign up . WE ALL KNOW WHOSE RADIO ROCKS Paul Doyle Barney Ronay guardian.co.uk

Read the rest here:
The Fiver | Footballing Rod Hulls; and An Adequately Resourced Pele Museum | Paul Doyle and Barney Ronay

BP Cleanup Crews, in Louisiana, Have Trampled Pelican Nests and Eggs, And Have Killed Newly-Hatched Chicks By Crushing Them – Graphic Photo

By the CNN Wire Staff June 16, 2010 9:55 a.m. EDT Photo: The nesting grounds of brown pelicans and other birds have been affected, the Plaquemines Parish president says. Venice, Louisiana (CNN) — Crews cleaning up the oil in one Louisiana parish have trampled the nests and eggs of birds including the brown pelican, which came off the endangered species list last year, the head of the parish said Wednesday. Plaquemines Parish President Billy Nungesser said the parish doesn't want to turn away contractors, but he called for more care when crews work in the sensitive wetlands. He said officials recently found broken eggs and crushed chicks on Queen Bess Island, near Grand Isle. Plastic bags containing snare boom were “recklessly placed” around the island without consideration for wildlife. In one picture released by the parish, a plastic bag was on top of a nest containing broken speckled eggs. Dozens of people, including experienced veterinarians, have been going to the area from all over the country to help with the affected wildlife, the parish said. Nungesser met with the Humane Society of the United States and asked it to work with contractors who are cleaning the birds to come up with a better way to enlist the help of volunteers, the parish said. “We want to improve our comfort level of knowing someone is out there looking for these birds and other animals — doing all they can to save them,” Nungesser said on the parish website. “The people BP sent out to clean up oil trampled the nesting grounds of brown pelicans and other birds,” he said. “Pelicans just came off the endangered species list in November of last year. They already have the oil affecting their population during their reproduction time, now we have the so-called clean up crews stomping eggs. “The lack of urgency and general disregard for Louisiana's wetlands and wildlife is enough to make you sick,” he said. added by: EthicalVegan