Tag Archives: country

Has Uganda’s Anti-Gay Bill Influenced Others in Africa?

This week has brought more troubling news from Africa about anti-gay efforts: A Malawi gay couple is now facing 14 years in prison for holding a symbolic wedding ceremony. I recently returned from Uganda, where a bill was introduced that would make homosexuality a crime punishable by life in prison or, in some cases, death. While reporting on this story, I spoke with many of the politicians and religious leaders responsible for the anti-gay campaign in the country. And most, if not all of them told me how they believed that Uganda would set an example for other nations. “We think that God may be using this country of Uganda to provide leadership in the area of moral issues where the world needs it most,” said Ugandan Member of Parliament David Bahati, who authored the bill. Bahati and other backers of the legislation told me how they have already received several calls from politicians all across Africa who have been inspired by Uganda’s proposed anti-gay legislation. Homosexuality is already illegal in 38 African countries—just as it already is in Uganda—but that hasn’t stopped backers of the bill from trying to make it even more so, and the penalties even harsher. Vanguard's “Missionaries of Hate” premieres on Current TV Wednesday, May 26 at 10/9c. Watch a trailer for the episode after the jump. added by: MarianaVanZeller

Think Arizona’s laws are tough? Lets look at Mexico…

Perhaps we should adopt similar laws as to what's on the books in Mexico for legal/illegal immigration: – Illegal entry into the country is equivalent to a felony punishable by two years' imprisonment. Document fraud is subject to fine and imprisonment; so is alien marriage fraud. Evading deportation is a serious crime; illegal re-entry after deportation is punishable by ten years' imprisonment. Foreigners may be kicked out of the country without due process and the endless bites at the litigation apple that illegal aliens are afforded in our country (see, for example, President Obama's illegal alien aunt — a fugitive from deportation for eight years who is awaiting a second decision on her previously rejected asylum claim). – The Mexican government will bar foreigners if they upset “the equilibrium of the national demographics.” How's that for racial and ethnic profiling? – If outsiders do not enhance the country's “economic or national interests” or are “not found to be physically or mentally healthy,” they are not welcome. Neither are those who show “contempt against national sovereignty or security.” They must not be economic burdens on society and must have clean criminal histories. Those seeking to obtain Mexican citizenship must show a birth certificate, provide a bank statement proving economic independence, pass an exam and prove they can provide their own healthcare. – Law enforcement officials at all levels — by national mandate — must cooperate to enforce immigration laws, including illegal alien arrests and deportations. The Mexican military is also required to assist in immigration enforcement operations. Native-born Mexicans are empowered to make citizens' arrests of illegal aliens and turn them in to authorities. – Ready to show your papers? Mexico's National Catalog of Foreigners tracks all outside tourists and foreign nationals. A National Population Registry tracks and verifies the identity of every member of the population, who must carry a citizens' identity card. Visitors who do not possess proper documents and identification are subject to arrest as illegal aliens. http://www.onenewsnow.com/Perspectives/Default.aspx?id=992156 added by: occhipij

How does Mexico treat its illegals?

By Larry Elder We can't infringe upon the right of people to move freely within our territory,” said Mexican President Vicente Fox during President George W. Bush's recent visit. Earlier, Fox said he stood by the statement he previously made to the BBC: “I dare say that in 10 years, the U.S. will be begging, will be pleading with Mexico to send it workers.” Does Mexico practice what it preaches? First, Mexico put its military and police forces on its porous, zigzagged, mountainous, crime-ridden southern border with Guatemala. Chiapas – the South Carolina-sized southern Mexican state that shares the longest border with Guatemala – is Mexico's poorest, most illiterate state. About Chiapas, one United Nations human rights commissioner said, “Mexico is one of the countries where illegal immigrants are highly vulnerable to human rights violations and become victims of degrading sexual exploitation and slavery-like practices, and are denied access to education and health care.” Typically, when Mexican authorities catch illegal aliens, they place them overnight in a detention center, then bus or fly them back to their country of origin. Despite the fact that Mexico militarized its border and deported 203,128 illegal immigrants in 2004, many illegals get through by bribing corrupt military and police. Do Mexicans appreciate the way America has allowed so many poor, Mexican illegals to enter the United States? No. According to a recent Zogby poll, 73 percent of Mexicans call Americans “racist”! When asked whether the United States' wealth comes from freedom and “plenty of opportunity to work,” 70 percent of Americans agreed, while only 22 percent of Mexicans agreed. Sixty-two percent of Mexicans said America became wealthy because “it exploits others' wealth.” While Americans, according to the poll, see Mexicans as hard-working (78 percent), Mexicans think of Americans as racist, intolerant and not very hard-working. Racist? Mexico should look in the mirror. According to the Houston Chronicle's Rachel Graves, around the turn of the 17th century, Mexico imported more African slaves than anywhere else in the New World. As a result, tens of thousands of blacks (no one knows for sure – the Mexican census does not recognize them) live in Mexico, mostly in destitute villages in its poorest states. An estimated 30,000 to 40,000 blacks live in Costa Chica. How do they fare? According to the Houston Chronicle, many are illiterate, struggling to get a decent education for their children from government schools. One Costa Chica missionary says, “The kids here are considered by their teachers to be largely unteachable.” When stopped by the police, Mexican blacks are often instructed to sing the Mexican national anthem to prove their citizenship! If so many Mexicans consider Americans racist, why do polls show that nearly half of Mexico's inhabitants say that their lives would improve if they could work here illegally? Intolerant? America legally accepts about 1 million immigrants per year, with perhaps as many as 12 million people living here illegally, about half of whom come from Mexico. Many estimate that 500,000 or more people enter the country illegally every year. California Lt. Gov. Cruz Bustamante is Hispanic. So is the man who holds the powerful position of speaker of the California Assembly. Los Angeles, America's second-largest city, has a Hispanic mayor, and of the 54 members of California's congressional delegation, nine are Hispanic. The former governor of California once proposed granting driver's licenses to illegals. And in California, under some circumstances, an illegal alien can apply for the cheaper in-state college tuition. Many predict the Hispanic governor of New Mexico, Bill Richardson, former Clinton Cabinet member, will run for president. Not very hard-working? According to the International Labor Organization, Americans work more than almost anybody in the developed world, including Japan. The average American worked 1,824 hours in 2004, compared with the Spanish at 1,799 and the French at 1,441 hours. The Dutch put in even less – working 25 percent fewer hours than Americans. President Bush, against the wishes of many in his own party as well of half of all Americans, makes the reasonable case for a guest worker program that would allow or provide some sort of legal status for those living here illegally. Latino “activists” do that cause harm by staging protests and waving the Mexican flag and demanding their “rights.” For example, Juan Jose Gutierrez of Latino Movement USA says, “We think that the right thing to do is to grant full rights, full equality, under the laws in the Constitution of the United States, to all immigrants, period.” Americans raise legitimate concerns about the competition illegals pose to unskilled labor, and that illegals cut in front of people already waiting in line to get in the country legally. Americans resent expenditures for illegals on education and health care, and problems posed by some who commit additional crime in America. Illegals' attitude of entitlement helps to explain the growing anger Americans feel toward illegal aliens. Students leaving high schools, waving Mexican flags and chanting “Si se puede” do their “cause” – no favor. http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=49620 added by: nowherefast

Gulf oil spill killing birds and sealife

Pictures of the extent of this ecocide as the oil continues to gush out of the well 31 days after the Deepwater Horizon blew… THIRTY ONE DAYS. Scientists estimate that it could well be 100,000 gallons not 5000 gallons per day escaping from this well, which surely explains how it has now created subsurface plumes and become a part of the current loop that will in time more than likely carry it up the East Coast to spread its cancer. You cannot look at the photos of these animals and not be emotionally struck by them. Our very biodiversity and the ecosystems they and we depend on to live are now in great danger. And yet, all we get from BP are lies, coverups, and one failed attempt after another to plug this well and aggressively seek to save the wildlife and sealife that inhabits this once beautiful part of our country. And all we get from this government is a reshuffling of the incompetence that aided in it and feigned outrage as BP's stock price actually rises. There is no way to recover the moral conscience lost in regards to this gash that now bleeds our planet. It is an open wound that reveals to all the price paid when what is less important is given a false value over those things whose value is immeasurable. I really don't know how much more I can watch of this unfolding. Water is what gives us life, and we are killing it… and my heart is aching. I do know this, however. I know that as someone like so many who cares for the sustainability of this planet and the future of our children, I will not rest until those responsible for this pay. added by: JanforGore

Should Lindsay Lohan Pull a Polanski?

A judge in L.A. today issued a warrant for Lindsay Lohan’s arrest when the starlet failed to show for a mandatory “DUI progress-report hearing.” By now Lohan’s excuse is relatively well-known: She was visiting Cannes and, er, her passport was stolen. Her team says she’s spent the last few days working with the State Department to get a replacement (the U.S. Embassy in France denies this ), while French authorities say she never even reported the original stolen in the first place. As a result of the warrant, says the U.S. Customs Agency, Lohan will be arrested when attempting to reenter the country. Which of course raises the question: Why even bother coming home?

See the original post here:
Should Lindsay Lohan Pull a Polanski?

Malawi gay couple sentenced to 14 years in jail

A judge in Malawi has sentenced a gay couple to 14 years in prison with hard labour after they were convicted of gross indecency and unnatural acts. The judge said he wanted to “protect” the public. Steven Monjeza, 26, and Tiwonge Chimbalanga, 20, have been in jail since their arrest in December 2009 after holding an engagement ceremony. Their arrest sparked international condemnation and a debate about homosexuality in the country. “I will give you a scaring sentence so that the public be protected from people like you, so that we are not tempted to emulate this horrendous example,” said Judge Nyakwawa Usiwa-Usiwa in the commercial capital, Blantyre. Defence lawyer Mauya Msuku had argued for a lighter sentence, pointing out that the pair's actions had not victimised anyone. Peter Tatchell Gay rights campaigner: “Unlike in a rape case, there was no complainant or victim in this case,” he said after the pair were convicted on Tuesday. “Here are two consenting adults doing their thing in private. Nobody will be threatened or offended if they are released into society.” Michelle Kagari, deputy Africa director of Amnesty International, called the sentence “an outrage”, reports the AP news agency. She described the pair as “prisoners of conscience” and said Amnesty would continue to campaign for them to be freed. Malawi is a conservative society where same-sex liaisons are frowned upon. The judge said same-sex relations were “un-Malawian”. But UK gay rights campaigner Peter Tatchell pointed out that the laws under which the pair were convicted were introduced during British colonial rule. “These laws are a foreign imposition. They are not African,” he said, The men had denied the charges and their lawyers said their constitutional rights had been violated. But the Centre for the Development of People (Cedep) and the Centre for Human Rights and Rehabilitation (CHRR) have been urging authorities to relax the country's stance on homosexuals. The BBC's Raphael Tenthani in Blantyre says the government has come under pressure from Western donors over the issue. For a poor country, 40% of whose development budget depends on donors, such concerns must be taken seriously, he adds. added by: crystalman

NKorea warns of war if punished for ship sinking

Washington (CNN) — The president of South Korea has vowed “resolute” measures against North Korea for its alleged attack on a South Korean warship, South Korea's Yonhap News Agency reported Thursday. A five-country committee announced Thursday morning in Seoul that they had concluded a North Korean submarine fired a torpedo that sunk the South Korea warship in March. “(We) will take resolute countermeasures against North Korea and make it admit its wrongdoings through strong international cooperation and return to the international community as a responsible member,” President Lee Myung-bak told Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd in phone talks, according to Lee's office, Yonhap reported. The warship, the Cheonan, sank after an explosion ripped it in half on March 26 in disputed waters off North Korea. Forty-six sailors were killed or lost in the incident. North Korea immediately denied the allegation. The North Korean National Defense Commission said in a statement to official television that its navy did not torpedo the South Korean ship, calling South Korean Lee Myung-bak “a traitor,” Yonhap reported. The conclusion came from a joint investigation committee composed of American, Australian, British and Swedish and South Korean experts. The United States has been “deeply and actively involved” in the investigation and “strongly supports its conclusions,” Assistant Secretary of State Kurt Campbell said. Since last month, the U.S. military has believed a North Korean torpedo attack was the most likely cause of the explosion, according to a U.S. military official. The military official said at the time that the blast of an underwater explosion sank the ship, but that the explosive device itself did not come in contact with the hull of the South Korean ship. The United States has a mutual defense treaty with South Korea and Japan to defend “against any aggression,” so if a military confrontation develops, the United States would be responsible for defending South Korea, the official said. “I don't think it will come to that,” the official said. “They know they need to have a response, but there is too much at stake for South Korea to have a confrontation on the Korean peninsula. North Korea has nothing to lose, but South Korea is a serious country with a huge economy.” There are military options for South Korea beyond firing missiles, said John Delury, who studies North and South Korea at the Asia Society. Anything combative would hurt South Korea economically, Delury said, but the country could increase its naval presence along the line that divides South and North Korea in the waters surrounding the countries. He notes that comes with a risk. “Those actions could trigger a conflict,” he noted. “It will be interesting to see how South Korean President Lee [Myung-bak] characterizes this incident,” said Nicholas Szechenyi, deputy director at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a Washington-based think tank. “A military strike of some sort would be risky because the North Korean regime is so unpredictable,” he said. “You have to be careful about military retaliation because North Korea has thousands of artillery pieces pointed towards the south and could bombard Seoul very quickly.'” The senior U.S. official said that South Korea is expected to “come up with a set of responsible measures” in response, such as action at the U.N. Security Council. Included in those actions could be a resolution condemning the attack, arguing it violates the U.N. charter, Szechenyi said. “The problem is that China is a permanent member of the council and tends to take a very soft position on North Korea, so it is an open question whether the resolution will pass or not,” he said. The Chinese will face a lot of pressure from the United States, but it already sent a clear message of solidarity with North Korea when it recently rolled out the red carpet to receive North Korean leader Kim Jong Il, Delury said. The United States and South Korea could also delay the upcoming transfer of operational control of U.S. and Korean military forces from the United States to South Korea. The transfer is due in April 2012. “It would be more of a political statement to remind North Korea the U.S. is a steadfast ally of South Korea and will come to its defense,” Szechenyi said. Seoul also has limited economic activity with Pyongyang that could be suspended, including a joint industrial complex and some trade. North Korean involvement in the attack also would throw doubt on the future of six-party nuclear diplomacy talks involving the United States, South Korea, China, Japan and Russia. China has been pushing for another round of talks, but the senior U.S. official said there will be less interest now in a quick return to the negotiations. “If the North Koreans are going to continue to misbehave, we have to think whether it makes sense to return to the six-party talks,” the official said. On the other hand, the official suggested the incident might give the United States leverage. China, which hosts the talks and has the closest relationship with North Korea, could be encouraged to get a “better resumption point” in the talks, rather than just pick up where they left off, the official said. Szechenyi suggested South Korea might also ask the United States to put North Korea back on the list of state sponsors of terror, from which it was removed in 2008 as part of the effort to get the country to stop its nuclear program. Putting the country back on the terror list would trigger a number of tough economic sanctions against North Korea, he said. U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who will visit Seoul next week, will talk with the South Korean government about the investigation, Assistant Secretary Campbell said. Clinton will also visit Japan and China during her trip, and the North Korean issue is likely to be high on the agenda. Clinton will have “the closest possible consultations with Japan, China and South Korea about the next phase,” added by: onemalefla

Wal-Mart still selling Miley Cyrus cadmium jewelry

R U SERIOUS!!! CADMIUM HAS NO CONSTRUCTIVE PURPOSE AROUND THE HUMAN BODY! CADMIUM AND ITS COMPOUNDS ARE EXTREMELY TOXIC EVEN IN LOW CONCENTRATIONS! IT WILL BIOACCUMALATE IN ORGANISMS AND THE ECOSYSTEM! LOS ANGELES – Jewelry from two entire lines being sold exclusively at Walmart stores nationwide, including bracelets and necklaces branded by Miley Cyrus, contains high levels of the toxic metal cadmium, according to an Associated Press investigation. Testing of 61 samples purchased by AP reporters across the country from a Cyrus line and from a series of make-it-yourself metal bracelet charms indicated that 59 of the pieces contained at least 5 percent cadmium by weight, with 53 of those measuring 10 percent or higher. And the world's largest retailer knows the items are tainted. Wal-Mart Stores Inc. received test results in February showing cadmium in these jewelry lines, but has continued selling the items. Instead, Wal-Mart revealed in an April 26 statement that as of April 9, it was requiring suppliers to show through tests at a company-approved lab that children's jewelry and other kids' products had little cadmium — or else Wal-Mart would not accept the items for sale. The policy did not apply to products already on store shelves. A Wal-Mart executive told a Consumer Product Safety Commission hearing that testing items already in stores would be too difficult. In its only comment for this story, Wal-Mart said the Miley Cyrus jewelry was for “juniors,” without defining that age range. Representatives for Miley Cyrus and BCBGMaxAzria did not comment when asked. To judge the extent of the ongoing availability of pieces that Wal-Mart knew were contaminated, AP dispatched reporters throughout the country last month. They purchased any of 13 items matching those on the test results the company had in February. Those items came from two product lines: three were Miley Cyrus jewelry, a project done with designer BCBGMaxAzria; the other 10 were from a series of make-it-yourself metal bracelet charms. The packaging said they were made in China; all were bought for $6 or less. All but one of the 13 was on store shelves in the eight states where AP reporters looked. At AP's request, the purchased items were then tested by Prof. Jeff Weidenhamer, a chemist at Ashland University in Ohio. He said the average cadmium content was 16 percent, and that the levels are probably higher. Weidenhamer's prior research has shown that the testing method he used — an X-ray gun that can roughly tell the amount of cadmium in an item — typically underestimates how much is present. Representatives of the jewelry industry have argued that the presence of cadmium, even at high levels, is not by itself proof that an item is dangerous. The important thing, they say, isn't how much cadmium is in jewelry but rather how much can escape if the item is sucked, bitten or swallowed. Cadmium in children's jewelry became a public concern in January when the AP published the results of an investigation that showed items at Walmarts — and other large chains — were as much as 91 percent of the toxic metal by weight. Federal regulators have since issued three recalls, including one affecting “The Princess and The Frog” movie themed pendants sold at Walmarts. Long-term exposure to cadmium can lead to bone softening and kidney failure. It is a known carcinogen that recent research suggests can, like lead, hinder brain development in the very young. While AP's January investigation focused on jewelry clearly intended for children, the items tested for AP this time were labeled “not intended for children under 14 years.” That is an important legal distinction: Under current regulation, children's items are defined as for kids 12 and under, and children's products have all kinds of regulations that others do not. Federal regulators' own research says that kids start becoming interested in making their own jewelry around age six or eight. As for products featuring Miley Cyrus — she is 17 and thanks to the “Hannah Montana” franchise, her appeal dips down to kids as young as five. The importer of the charms for make-it-yourself bracelets, Cousin Corp. of America, said the jewelry was targeted at adults. Roy Gudgeon, vice president of merchandise at Florida-based Cousin, said that didn't mean high cadmium levels were acceptable. “We recognize that many of our adult customers are homemakers who may have children present in their home,” he said. “Our intention as a company is to never willingly cause harm to a child.” After checking company records, Gudgeon said that it had imported more than 300,000 of the charms that Weidenhamer tested. Shipment figures were not immediately available for the Miley Cyrus items. ___ added by: onemalefla

Arizona Official Threatens to Cut Off Los Angeles Power as Payback for Boycott

If Los Angeles wants to boycott Arizona, it had better get used to reading by candlelight. That's the message from a member of Arizona's top government utilities agency, who threw down the gauntlet Tuesday in a letter to Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa by threatening to cut off the city's power supply as retribution. Gary Pierce, a commissioner on the five-member Arizona Corporation Commission, wrote the letter in response to the Los Angeles City Council's decision last week to boycott the Grand Canyon State — in protest of its immigration law — by suspending official travel there and ending future contracts with state businesses. Noting that a quarter of Los Angeles' electricity comes from Arizona power plants, Pierce threatened to pull the plug if the City Council does not reconsider. “Doggone it — if you're going to boycott this candy store … then don't come in for any of it,” Pierce told FoxNews.com. In the letter, he ridiculed Villaraigosa for saying that the point of the boycott was to “send a message” by severing the “resources and ties” they share. “I received your message; please receive mine. As a statewide elected member of the Arizona Corporation Commission overseeing Arizona's electric and water utilities, I too am keenly aware of the 'resources and ties' we share with the city of Los Angeles,” Pierce wrote. “If an economic boycott is truly what you desire, I will be happy to encourage Arizona utilities to renegotiate your power agreements so Los Angeles no longer receives any power from Arizona-based generation.” Appearing to tap into local frustration in Arizona over the raft of boycotts and threatened boycotts from cities across the country, including Los Angeles, Pierce warned that Arizona companies are willing and ready to fight boycott with boycott. “I am confident that Arizona's utilities would be happy to take those electrons off your hands,” Pierce wrote. “If, however, you find that the City Council lacks the strength of its convictions to turn off the lights in Los Angeles and boycott Arizona power, please reconsider the wisdom of attempting to harm Arizona's economy.” Pierce told FoxNews.com that he was speaking for himself, not the entire commission, though he has the support of at least one other member. But Arizona has some serious leverage over Los Angeles, as well as the rest of California. The state and city get electricity from a nuclear power plant outside Phoenix, as well as from coal-fired power plants in northern Arizona and two giant hydroelectric power generators along the Colorado River. Despite that, the Los Angeles City Council voted overwhelmingly last week to ban future business with Arizona — a decision that could cost Arizona millions of dollars in lost contracts. Los Angeles officials were furious with the Arizona immigration law passed last month and joined local officials in cities across the country in pushing boycotts to register their dismay. Critics say the law will lead to racial profiling and civil rights abuses. Arizona officials have defended the law, saying the state needed to take its illegal immigration problem into its own hands. Pierce said he's “supportive” of the state's efforts to control the border. The law requires local law enforcement to try to verify the immigration status of anyone they have contact with whom they suspect of being an illegal immigrant. It empowers them to turn over verified illegal immigrants to federal custody. The legislation explicitly prohibits screening people based solely on race or national origin. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/05/19/arizona-official-threatens-cut-los-an… added by: IndustryRule

Hayden Panettiere’s Tight Little Package

I don’t really like chicks with short hair, it just doesn’t look right, unless they’re dominating on the softball diamond winning gold for my country at the Summer Olympics . Oh that’s right, softball has been dropped by the Olympics for being too exciting, action packed, high rated, evenly matched … It doesn’t matter. What matters is that little person Hayden Panettiere actually looks alright with a short little haircut. It doesn’t hurt that she’s got a tight little body most midgets would absolutely kill for.