Tag Archives: democrats

MRC’s Tim Graham Addresses ‘Mainstream Media Meltdown’ on Fox & Friends

MRC Director of Media Analysis Tim Graham appeared on Saturday morning’s Fox & Friends to discuss the emerging examples of liberal “mainstream” media meltdown over the Democrats being abandoned by the voters – and how the public is now a collection of “spoiled” brats , according to liberal talk show host Bill Press. Fox also highlighted Washington Post columnist/blogger Ezra Klein suggesting the voters are “schizophrenic” when they say they trust Democrats more on issues like the economy, and then say they’ll be voting for Republicans in the fall. What the Post actually found is the full sample trusted Democrats more, 42 to 34, but among likely voters it was 40 percent trusted Republicans more to 39 percent Democrat. Tim suggested Press and others were already sounding life the aftermath of the 1994 elections, when then-ABC anchorman issued a radio commentary denouncing the country being a “nation of uncontrolled two-year-old rage.” (Audio here .) As Tim said, Press was so unhappy with the current mood of the electorate that he said neither Abraham Lincoln nor Franklin Roosevelt could govern this bitter crowd. Democrats are starting to look like losers, and perhaps dramatic losers. This could be a remarkable year to mock the folks who suggested “reality has a liberal bias.” The shoe is on the other foot, and liberals look like the ones denying reality, insisting the economy is terrific, the Gulf will soon by squeaky-clean, and their political fortunes are fantastic.

Original post:
MRC’s Tim Graham Addresses ‘Mainstream Media Meltdown’ on Fox & Friends

Motorola Droid X sold out online

Verizon has officially sold out of the Motorola Droid X online and it will be a few days before begin shipping them again. added by: admillios

Obama Adminstration’s Ridiculous Pornography Trial Violates Constitution & Individual Rights

Click here for full article! http://www.lp.org/news/press-releases/ridiculous-pornography-trial-violates-cons… The federal trial of pornographer John Stagliano began last week. Libertarian National Committee Chairman Mark Hinkle issued the following statement today: “The Obama Administration's prosecution of John Stagliano is a travesty. “As Reason magazine's Richard Abowitz wrote, 'The case against Stagliano concerns the selling of movies performed by consenting adults to entertain adult DVD viewers who have chosen to watch these films. In a free and open society this is exactly the kind of prosecution that should not happen.' “Many Americans find it far more obscene that Democrats and Republicans are piling trillions of dollars of debt on our children and gr…….. …………”It is worth noting that this case was not initiated by citizen complaints. FBI agents just purchased the materials, watched them, and then brought charges. It's clear that the FBI budget needs to be cut. “Apparently President Obama's Justice Department is no different than former President Bush's when it comes to prosecuting speech. Obama has sustained the 'Obscene Prosecution Task Force,' which was created by the Bush Administration in 2005.” The Libertarian Party's platform states, “We support full freedom of expression and oppose government censorship, regulation or control of communications media and technology.”….. http://www.lp.org/news/press-releases/ridiculous-pornography-trial-violates-cons… added by: shanklinmike

Wall Street Reform Passes–Big Banks Celebrate

(Reuters) – The Congress on Thursday approved the broadest overhaul of financial rules since the Great Depression and sent it to President Barack Obama to sign into law. By a vote of 60 to 39, the Senate passed a sweeping measure that tightens regulations across the financial industry in an effort to avoid a repeat of the 2007-2009 financial crisis. President Barack Obama will likely sign the bill into law next week, the White House said. The legislation, opposed by the banking industry, leaves few corners of the financial industry untouched. It establishes new consumer protections, gives regulators greater power to dismantle troubled firms, and limits a range of risky trading activities in a way that would curb bank profits. The Senate vote caps more than a year of legislative effort after Obama proposed reforms in June 2009. The House of Representatives approved it last month. Although Obama originally had pushed for bipartisan support for an overhaul of financial regulation, only three Republican senators voted in favor of the bill, along with 55 Democrats and two Independents. With Republicans poised for big gains in the November congressional elections, Democrats are eager to show voters that they have tamed an industry that dragged the economy into its deepest recession in 70 years. “I regret I can't give you your job back, restore that foreclosed home, put retirement monies back in your account,” said Democratic Senator Christopher Dodd, one of the bill's chief authors. “What I can do is to see to it that we never, ever again go through what this nation has been through.” Along with the health-care overhaul, Democrats can now point out that they have passed two far-reaching reform efforts that will likely shape American society for generations. It is not clear whether that will impress voters. The public's understanding of the regulatory revamp is very low, according to an Ipsos online poll released on Thursday. Of those polled, 38 percent had never heard of the reform, while 33 percent had heard of it but knew nothing about the legislation. Other polls show the public divided about its merits. The bill has also won Democrats few friends on Wall Street as wealthy donors have started to steer more campaign contributions to Republicans. Financial markets showed little reaction on Thursday. Investors said passage was already priced into banks' share prices. Bank stocks have followed the overall market lower since April, weighed down by poor U.S. economic data and the belief that more regulation could crimp profits down the road. JPMorgan Chase & Co said the bill would not compromise its business model but might hurt profitability. “We'll have some effect on revenues and margins and volumes,” its chief executive, Jamie Dimon, said on a conference call. As the largest U.S. derivatives dealer, JPMorgan could have the most to lose from the bill, which aims to curb lucrative trading in risky over-the-counter derivatives and force banks to end trading for their own profits. FEW CORNERS OF INDUSTRY UNTOUCHED Under the 2,300-page bill, mortgage brokers, student lenders and other financial firms will have to answer to a new consumer-protection authority, though auto dealers will escape scrutiny. Regulators, who scrambled to contain the damage from failing firms like Lehman Brothers in the last crisis, will have new authority to dismantle troubled firms if they threaten the broader economy. A council of regulators will monitor big-picture risks to the financial system and many large banks will have to set aside more capital to help them ride out times of crisis. Large private-equity and hedge funds will face more scrutiny from federal regulators, and credit-rating agencies could potentially see their entire business model upended. Much of the $615 trillion over-the-counter derivatives market will be routed through more accountable and transparent channels, and banks will have to spin off the riskiest of their swaps clearing desk operations. http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE66E0MD20100715 added by: ScottyT

Is All This ‘Conservatives Are Racist’ Talk Designed to Save Dems in November?

Have you noticed that you can’t swing a dead cat these days without hitting some television host claiming the Tea Party or a conservative is racist? Turn on ABC and there it is. Ditto CBS , CNN , and MSNBC . Can’t get away from it, can you? Think it’s just a coincidence, or could this be a response to President Obama’s plummeting poll numbers and the panic in the liberal media that November could be a realigning election that results in a massive Republican sweep of Congress? Before you answer, consider the following written Wednesday by Gina Loudon, the founder of Buycott Arizona: With no way to win on the issues, Democrats would need some way to energize their base. So in 2010, they began playing the race card as hard as they could. In a very rare move, the president of the United States rushed out to tell the world that he had a racist state that had gone rogue and needed to be punished. Adding to the narrative, Democratic congressional leaders invited a foreign leader to excoriate millions of Americans from the floor of Congress…While assailing white voters in Arizona, the Obama administration got caught in an Orwellian scenario that makes it appear the policy of this Chicago machine administration is that some people really are “more equal” than others.   On Tuesday, the Los Angeles Times reported : Democratic strategists looking to stave off major losses in the upcoming midterm election have devised a precise and targeted role for President Obama: recapturing the enthusiasm he generated as a fresh-faced candidate vying to become the nation’s first black president.  This seems crucial for Democrat success, as according to a recent survey by the Pew Research Center, Republicans are far more energized: Fully 56% of Republican voters say they are more enthusiastic about voting this year than in previous elections – the highest percentage of GOP voters expressing increased enthusiasm about voting in midterms dating back to 1994. While enthusiasm among Democratic voters overall is on par with levels in 2006, fewer liberal Democrats say they are more enthusiastic about voting than did so four years ago (52% then, 37% today). The Republican Party now holds about the same advantage in enthusiasm among its party’s voters that the Democratic Party held in June 2006 and the GOP had late in the 1994 campaign. Moreover, more Republicans than Democrats are now paying close attention to election news (64% vs. 50%). Coincidentally as the Times noted, the President is changing his approach:  More and more, Obama is taking on a partisan tone. He is weaving a story line peopled with villains and heroes, fools and leaders. In a speech Thursday in Las Vegas, he mocked Sen. Harry Reid’s election opponent, Republican Sharron Angle, saying she “favors an approach that’s even more extreme than the Republicans we got in Washington. That’s saying something.”  It sure is saying something: Obama and Company, realizing November looks like a disaster, are beginning to demonize the opposition. And, as midterm elections are often about turnout, the key right now for the Left is to figure out a way to energize those that helped Obama get elected in the first place. The solution: play the race card. Nothing gets the ire up in liberals more than racism.  After all, you might still be unemployed, and this administration may not have brought about all the Hope and Change they campaigned on, but Republicans are all racists. This includes many of their elected officials, their surrogates at Fox News, the radio personalities they love like Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck, and, of course, those awful Teabaggers. The NAACP just put that red letter on THEIR backs, don’t you know? With the strategy in place, all that’s needed is a compliant media stoking the fire of discontent. Just try swinging a dead cat without hitting someone that fits THAT bill. 

Read more:
Is All This ‘Conservatives Are Racist’ Talk Designed to Save Dems in November?

Obama care won’t fund abortions? "Obama Administration OKs First Tax-Funded Abortions Under Health Care Law"

Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) — The Obama administration has officially approved the first instance of taxpayer funded abortions under the new national government-run health care program. This is the kind of abortion funding the pro-life movement warned about when Congress considered the bill. The Obama Administration will give Pennsylvania $160 million to set up a new “high-risk” insurance program under a provision of the federal health care legislation enacted in March. It has quietly approved a plan submitted by an appointee of pro-abortion Governor Edward Rendell under which the new program will cover any abortion that is legal in Pennsylvania. The high-risk pool program is one of the new programs created by the sweeping health care legislation, Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, President Obama signed into law on March 23. The law authorizes $5 billion in federal funds for the program, which will cover as many as 400,000 people when it is implemented nationwide. “The Obama Administration will give Pennsylvania $160 million in federal tax funds, which we've discovered will pay for insurance plans that cover any legal abortion,” said Douglas Johnson, legislative director for the National Right to Life Committee. Johnson told LifeNews.com: “This is just the first proof of the phoniness of President Obama's assurances that federal funds would not subsidize abortion — but it will not be the last.” “President Obama successfully opposed including language in the bill to prevent federal subsidies for abortions, and now the Administration is quietly advancing its abortion-expanding agenda through administrative decisions such as this, which they hope will escape broad public attention,” Johnson said. The abortion funding comes despite language in the bill that some pro-abortion Democrats and Obama himself claimed would prevent abortion funding and despite a controversial executive order Obama signed supposedly stopping abortion funding. More at the link: http://lifenews.com/nat6531.html **** I seem to recall a slew of liberals on Current attacking the pundits and commentators on Fox and their claim that the Obamacare policies WOULD fund abortion. Remember them being called liars? Remember the slander of Fox News entirely? And NOW we have yet one more example of how Fox had it right, the Liberals were either wrong (that's being too nice) or were lying (much more accurate), and we have yet another example of why Obama and the Democrats cannot be trusted. added by: curtisreed

What Does The Financial Reform Bill Do Other Than Being Completely And Utterly Worthless?

Is it possible to write a 2,300 page piece of legislation that accomplishes next to nothing and is pretty much completely and utterly worthless? The answer is yes. Barack Obama has been trumpeting the Dodd-Frank financial reform bill as the “biggest rewrite of Wall Street rules since the Great Depression”, but the truth is that after the Wall Street lobbyists got done carving it up, the bill that was left was so watered down and so toothless that it essentially accomplishes nothing except creating even more government bureaucracy and even more mind-numbing paperwork. The bill is so riddled with loopholes for the big banks that it is basically the legislative equivalent of Swiss cheese. The Democrats in the Senate were ecstatic when they announced that they had secured the 60 votes needed to pass this legislation, but when they are asked about what the financial reform bill will do, most of them are left stammering for some kind of cohesive response. The sad truth is that most of them probably don't understand the bill and none of them will probably ever read the entire thing. added by: Revelation1217

WaPo Insists GOP Lacks Confidence of 72 Percent; But 43 Percent Said They Had ‘Some’

The Washington Post announced bad news for its largely liberal readers in its poll Tuesday morning. The headline said “6 in 10 Americans lack faith in Obama: Congress still held in lower esteem, but poll shows gap narrowing.” Those who read the story would wait until the end of paragraph six (just before the jump) to get this liberal-haunting number: “Those most likely to vote in the midterms prefer the GOP over continued Democratic rule by a sizable margin of 56 percent to 41 percent .” But if the Post reader skipped the gray text and went just for the graphics, they’d get the impression that Republicans are worse off than the Democrats: they’d see asked “how much confidence do you have” in the parties, they showed Obama’s “lack faith” number at 58 percent, Democrats in Congress at 68 percent, and Republicans at 72 percent. But wait: in parentheses it says “percent of voters saying ‘just some’ or ‘none'”. (That wasn’t bolded in the paper, as it is on the website.) Here’s the rub: deep in the Post’s data (question 3), it shows Republicans “just some” number was 43 percent and “none” was 29 percent, while Democrats “just some” number was 35 percent and “none” was 32 percent. So portraying the Republican standing as “worse” than the Democrats (complete with trouble-red emphasis) is misleading at best. Post reporters Dan Balz and Jon Cohen simply blurred the numbers together, without a breakdown: “About seven in 10 registered voters say they lack confidence in Democratic lawmakers and a similar proportion say so of Republican lawmakers.” But the networks took that misleading impression and hardened it, with NBC’s Matt Lauer proclaiming ” just slightly more than 7 in 10 Americans don’t have faith in Republicans in Congress.” That quick-and-dirty formulation has zero room for 43 percent of Americans saying “just some.” The real problem here is the news judgment of the Post: the first question isn’t “How much confidence?” It’s “Who are you voting for?” If the Republicans are up 56-41 among likely voters, clearly the “just some” confidence is presently more than enough. Near the bottom of the poll story, it gets even darker for Democratic prospects: Obama’s overall standing puts him at about the same place President Bill Clinton was in the summer of 1994, a few months before Republicans captured the House and Senate in an electoral landslide. President Ronald Reagan, who also contended with a serious recession at the outset of his first term, was a little lower at this point in 1982, with a 46 percent to 45 percent split on his approval ratings. Republicans went on to lose about two dozen seats in the House that fall. The Post projected its poll as bad for Democrats, but not happy news for Republicans. Inside the paper, the headline was “Obama viewed slightly better than lawmakers.” The text box on A6 acknowledged “Democrats nationally remain on the defensive as they seek to retain both houses of Congress this fall.”

See the article here:
WaPo Insists GOP Lacks Confidence of 72 Percent; But 43 Percent Said They Had ‘Some’

ABC’s George Stephanopoulos Touts Negative Poll Numbers for GOP, Spins for Obama

Good Morning America’s George Stephanopoulos on Tuesday spun a new ABC News/Washington Post poll , emphasizing problems for the Republican Party over dour news for Barack Obama. The co-host ignored a finding that likely voters want the GOP to take control of Congress by a margin of 56 to 41. He did, however, repeat the lower number of registered voters who prefer the Republicans, 51 percent. Stephanopoulos quizzed former McCain strategist Nicolle Wallace and Democrat James Carville on problems for the GOP: “[Voters] don’t necessarily want Republicans…On the economy, voters, 42 to 34 still trust Democrats over Republicans on the economy.” What did Stephanopoulos leave out? The same poll found that 40 percent of likely voters trust Republicans, compared to 39 percent for the Democrats. But, the former Democratic operative persisted, ” So, there’s still, Nicolle, no- not a lot of confidence in the Republican Party. ” Later, he prompted Wallace, “Is there anything else, right now, that Republicans can do, Nicolle, now, to address that number, that lack of confidence?” It seems likely that if this poll were about President Bush, Stephanopoulos would be much more likely to emphasize the negatives, such as the fact that 90 percent of Americans think the economy is in bad shape. The poll’s data can be found here . A transcript of the segment, which aired at 7:06am EDT on July 13, follows: GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: We’re going to turn now that ABC News/Washington Post poll. You know, the White House, for the first time over the weekend, admitted that Democrats could lose the control of Congress in November. And this poll shows why. Starting out with this frustration index, which we first showed you last month. That tries to capture how people feel about government, the economy, Congress and the President. Back in June, it was at 67 percent, a very high level. Right now in July, still stuck at 67 percent. We haven’t seen numbers that high since the past two big change elections of the last 25 years. 1992, when President Clinton took office, 2008, when President Obama took office. And it could have a direct impact on the congressional elections this fall. Another key number in the poll, we asked people who do you want to control Congress in November? Only 43 percent said they wanted to support Democrats to support [sic] President Obama’s policies.  51 percent said they wanted to give Congress to the Republicans, as a check on President Obama’s policies. And this is all rooted in concern over the economy. 90 percent of the country right now thinks the economy’s in bad shape. And President Obama’s approval ratings on the economy are dropping. Down to 43 percent. That’s down seven points in one month. 54 percent now disapprove of the job that President Obama is doing on the economy. Now, his overall approval ratings are holding up about 50 percent.  That’s a little bit down. But, they’re being held up because his numbers on commander in chief, are a little higher. But, most of this is bad news for the Democrats. Let me bring in our strategists, James Carville for the Democrats, Nicolle Wallace, for the Republicans. And, James, Robert Gibbs over the weekend, the White House press secretary, did say they’re looking at similar numbers. He said that Democrats could lose control of the Congress. All the intensity is on the Republican side. JAMES CARVILLE: You know, and Robert and I have had our problems in the past. And he went to Auburn, so, therefore, he’s is a little limited . But, saying that, this was brilliant. This is a time to say- STEPHANOPOULOS: To tell the truth? CARVILLE: Look- to say, you’re not casting- you’re not just casting a protest vote here. These guys will actually take charge. And if you want this drug companies putting the faulty drugs out, that’s fine. If you want BP, if you want Wall Street, these are the consequences of your vote. And I thought that was smart of Robert to do that. And I think Democrats- STEPHANOPOULOS: Not to sugar-coat. CARVILLE: Not to sugar-coat it. Every Democratic consultant is telling me they’re coming out of a focus group and saying, “Yeah, but they’re not going to do that if they go in there.” Yeah, focus group here in Kentucky or Nevada, you say, “Yeah, they’re crazy. But if they get to Washington, they won’t do all the other stuff. I want to vote against a Democrats to send a message.” At a point, you have to say, no. “You’re actually going to be voting for a policy here.” NICOLLE WALLACE: Well, the truth is, 51 percent of Americans, as you just pointed out, want Republicans in control because they want to put the brakes on this agenda. I think it confirms what people long suspected, which is that while some people still like Obama personally, I think that’s where the approval numbers come from, they want desperately now to put the brakes on his agenda. STEPHANOPOULOS: They don’t necessarily want Republicans . Another key number in the poll, we asked people who do you trust more, Democrats or Republicans on key issues? And let’s show that: On the economy, voters, 42 to 34 still trust Democrats over Republicans on the economy. On who is going to make the right decisions for the country’s future, same thing, 32, to 26. So, there’s still, Nicolle, no- not a lot of confidence in the Republican Party. WALLACE: Well, and that’s the needle in the haystack in this otherwise very grim assessment of voter sentiment. And, certainly, that is what, when they pull themselves away from the bars this morning , the Democrats will be waving that statistic around. But, I think, you know, they’re also going to point to the analogy of Reagan. But, what Reagan did when his numbers were down, was he crafted an agenda that appealed to independent voters who were running, not walking away, from Obama and his agenda. CARVILLE: I think that the key word that 51 percent is a protest vote. This is not a protest vote. This may be a vote for a policy and policy change. It’s much easier to say, I’m going to vote for somebody I don’t like because I want to protest someone else I don’t like. WALLACE: Well, how do you think Obama won? I mean, you know, Obama ran as a protest vote candidate for President. CARVILLE: I understand that people knew he was going to win. And they knew the policy he was running. My point is, right now, congressionally, people are saying “I just want to send the Democrats a message. And Republicans won’t be able to do anything of the things they say.” To some extent, you have to remind them there could be a policy involved in this. STEPHANOPOULOS: Is there anything else, right now, that Republicans can do, Nicolle, now, to address that number, that lack of confidence? WALLACE: Well, I think Republicans have to say laser-focused on what your poll shows is largest group of self-identified independents that most polls have seen. And I think that group is looking for common sense. They are looking for lower taxes. They’re very wary about an expanded role, size and cost of the federal government. And they’re worried about the deficit. I think that’s the jam Obama finds himself in. To grow the economy, most measures expand the deficit. STEPHANOPOULOS: You said Robert Gibbs was brilliant. What more should Democrats do to keep the House? CARVILLE: To keep the House? Well, we have a three-prong strategy to keep the House. It’s called the Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost. [Laughs] WALLACE: We tried that. STEPHANOPOULOS: You think that it’s impossible? CARVILLE: I think to keep the House- no. I think we can. Look, it’s possible to keep the House. But I think first, that to remind people that there’s consequences to this election. I think also, honestly, they need a few good months of decent job numbers and sort of make the case. And I felt the White House on this, they never say they have a strategy. There’s a plan in place. It may not be working as fast as you want. The Republicans are blocking a lot of it. But this is what we’re doing. And if they get a sense, they could do better than they are currently doing in this poll.

Here is the original post:
ABC’s George Stephanopoulos Touts Negative Poll Numbers for GOP, Spins for Obama

As Laura Ingraham Sells New Book, NBC’s Lauer Sells Idea That Dems, GOP Equally Hated

Laura Ingraham was invited on Tuesday’s Today show, to plug her new book The Obama Diaries , and predict how the midterm elections will go but she couldn’t get out of the segment without Today co-anchor Matt Lauer suggesting Republicans are just as unpopular as the Democrats. During the segment Lauer read from a Washington Post poll that stated 6 in 10 Americans don’t have faith in President Obama and 7 in 10 don’t have faith in Congressional Democrats but then also pointed out that 7 in 10 Americans don’t have much confidence in Republicans either as he asked Ingraham: “So what’s the message here? A pox on all their houses.” Ingraham agreed there’s “a lot of cynicism out there,” but went on to point out the folly of assuming Democrats are somehow safe as she retorted to Lauer: “I think that’s a little facile to say, ‘Oh everyone who’s in power is just a disaster and no one trusts anyone.’ I don’t think that’s true. I think what people are seeing, that the nation is in debt. We have a lack of focus on things like the Gulf Coast.” In fact Lauer completely glossed over the fact that the Washington Post poll article he read from clearly stated that “Those most likely to vote in the midterms prefer the GOP over continued Democratic rule by a sizable margin of 56 percent to 41 percent.” After the poll question, Ingraham went on to poke fun at the First Lady’s appearance in the Gulf Coast: I mean I know the First Lady dropped by the Gulf Coast. That was a beautiful image. She went to an ice cream shop. I thought dessert was not a right. But she had a, you know, a chocolate hurricane yesterday. That was a nice image. But we’re losing part of the country, Matt. We’re losing the Gulf Coast day by day by day. I hope the cap works. We’ll see if it does. Ingraham actually had a lot of fun at not only the Obamas’ expense, but also cheekily mocked Lauer’s colleague Brian Williams as seen in the following interview as it was aired on the July 13 Today show: MATT LAUER: Let me ask you about midterm elections. You heard in Chuck’s piece that, that a lot of people are now talking about the possibility Republicans could regain control of the House and the Senate, likelihood of it happening is what? INGRAHAM: Pretty likely in the House, not sure about the Senate. I should say that — this is actually breaking news today – Barack Obama in his diaries actually predicts gaining seats in both the House and the Senate, the bravado is quite something. LAUER: That’s because you write them as fictional entries in his diary. INGRAHAM: Well what’s fiction? What do you mean fiction? LAUER: Let, let me ask you this. INGRAHAM: Fiction?! LAUER: If they do, if Republicans do regain control of the House and make substantial gains in the Senate, will it be a general dissatisfaction voters are showing with Democrats in Congress or the administration or would you point to a specific tipping point? INGRAHAM: Well, who’s in charge? I mean we were promised hope and change. We were promised turning the page. A transparent White House. These are, are regular people but they have a new vision for America. Well a vision is unfolding and it’s not working out so well. That, that’s not political. That’s not ideological. That’s factual. I think people are seeing that jobs are not the focus. We’re doing a lot of, you know, fun partying at the White House, which is also cataloged in The Obama Diaries. There’s a lot of partying. A beautiful family, wonderful image. But the image for the country is not a comedy, Matt, it’s a tragedy. LAUER: If you look, if you look at the front page of the Washington Post there’s a poll and it kind of tells two stories. INGRAHAM: Yeah. LAUER: One it says, about 6 in 10 Americans are, do not have faith in President Obama. Almost 7 in 10 Americans don’t have faith in Democrats in Congress. But it also says- INGRAHAM: But? What’s the but? LAUER: -it also says that just slightly more than 7 in 10 Americans don’t have faith in Republicans in Congress. So what’s the message here? A pox on all their houses? INGRAHAM: Well I think there’s, yeah, there’s, there’s a lot of cynicism out there. But I think that’s a little facile to say, “Oh everyone who’s in power is just a disaster and no one trusts anyone.” I don’t think that’s true. I think what people are seeing, that the nation is in debt. We have a lack of focus on things like the Gulf Coast. I mean I know the First Lady dropped by the Gulf Coast. That was a beautiful image. She went to an ice cream shop. I thought dessert was not a right. But she had a, you know, a chocolate hurricane yesterday. That was a nice image. But we’re losing part of the country, Matt. We’re losing the Gulf Coast day by day by day. I hope the cap works. We’ll see if it does. LAUER: So, so- INGRAHAM: There’s been a failure in leadership. That’s why the polls are where they are. A failure in leadership. LAUER: Let me put you in charge. So if I put you in charge of the campaigns- INGRAHAM: Oh gosh, that’d be fun. LAUER: -campaigns of all the Republicans running in the midterm elections, what’s your bumper sticker? Is it, “We’re not Democrats” or is it something more? INGRAHAM: Well it might be “America First.” It might be focus on American families and American jobs. Period. America. Reignite a love affair with our country! We don’t need someone apologizing for America. We don’t need someone saying, “Well, American exceptionalism yes but there’s also Greek exceptionalism and British exceptionalism.” We need to reignite a love affair with America. That’s what I write about in The Obama Diaries. That’s the, that’s the comedy, the tragedy that’s kind of unfolding today. … LAUER: The Obama Diaries. Fictional entries in Obama’s diary. INGRAHAM: First of all is it fictional to say that the, the President with the burger runs. Remember last, last year Matt, last June when Brian Williams was in the backseat. Now that was funny. In the burger run with Obama? I love Brian Williams at that moment. You know, petting Bo the dog. That was comedy. The Obama Diaries? It’s revealing. LAUER: But, but what, four months or three-and-a-half months before midterm elections- INGRAHAM: Yeah. LAUER: -what do you want people to take away from this? Is this a fun romp? Is this? INGRAHAM: The book is revealing arrogance, incompetence, horror, and, Matt, Barack Obama and Joe Biden. You didn’t know this, they’re two of the funniest people on the face of the planet. You add Marian Robinson, Michelle Obama’s mother? She is, this woman is one of the best people, funniest, common sense. And she wants those daughters to eat junk food when they want to eat it, okay? LAUER: The book is The Obama Diaries. Laura it’s nice to have you. INGRAHAM: It’s great to see you Matt, as always. LAUER: Good to see you as well.

The rest is here:
As Laura Ingraham Sells New Book, NBC’s Lauer Sells Idea That Dems, GOP Equally Hated