Tag Archives: during-the-2008

Sarah Palin Slams Michelle Obama in Racially Charged Passage From New Book

In passages leaked from her forthcoming book America by Heart, Sarah Palin — the erstwhile quitter governor of Alaska, who now, by all indications, fancies herself as President of the United States — has taken another cheap shot at First Lady Michelle Obama. In a passage on perceptions of racial inequality in the United States, Palin slams President Barack Obama, who, she asserts, “seems to believe” that “America — at least America as it currently exists — is a fundamentally unjust and unequal country.” 2010-11-19-americabyheart392x600.jpg And then she goes after Michelle Obama: Certainly his wife expressed this view when she said during the 2008 campaign that she had never felt proud of her country until her husband started winning elections. In retrospect, I guess this shouldn't surprise us, since both of them spent almost two decades in the pews of the Reverend Jeremiah Wright's church listening to his rants against America and white people. The passage — coming on page 26 in a chapter entitled “We, the People” — echoes remarks made by Palin on the eve of the midterm elections, at a rally in San Jose, California, at which point she mocked remarks made by Michelle Obama during the 2008 campaign: “You know, when I hear people say, or had said during the campaign that they've never been proud of America,” Palin spat out. “Haven't they met anybody in uniform yet? I get tears in my eyes when I see that young man, that young woman, walking through the airport in uniform…you too… so proud to be American.” In fact, Michelle Obama's remarks were made (in Madison, Wisconsin, during the 2008 campaign) in a context of Americans being “unified around some basic common issues”: What we have learned over this year is that hope is making a comeback. It is making a comeback. And let me tell you something–for the first time in my adult lifetime, I am really proud of my country. And not just because Barack has done well, but because I think people are hungry for change. And I have been desperate to see our country moving in that direction, and just not feeling so alone in my frustration and disappointment. I've seen people who are hungry to be unified around some basic common issues, and it's made me proud. Afterwards, the First Lady further clarified her remarks by noting that she was referencing the “record number” of young voters participating in the political process in the 2008 campaign: For the first time in my lifetime, I am seeing people rolling up their sleeves in way that I haven't seen and really trying to figure this out, and that's the source of pride I was talking about. The passages from Palin's latest book first appeared at Palingates, where several other pages from American by Heart have also been posted. Palin followed up her comments about Michelle Obama by throwing an elbow at U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, also focusing on racial overtones: It also makes sense, then, that the man President Obama made his attorney general, Eric Holder, would call us a “nation of cowards” for failing to come to grips with what he described as the persistence of racism. added by: TimALoftis

Police Stop Man From Selling Fruit on a Corner

I wish I would've gotten out and taken pictures. This man was a fixture in my city. he would stand at a 4 way intersection and sell watermelons, strawberries, and other fruits and vegetables. I thought to myself “Wow this guy has some motivation to stand there all day in the sun with hundreds of cars passing him each day” I applauded his entrepreneurial spirit. And this cuts down to the reason Im a conservative. This guy should be allowed to sell that fruit on the corner. http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn :yERqwGj88bY6zM:http://www.acc-tv.com/images/wset/news/police_crime_siren.jpg&t=1 added by: ibrake4rappers13

Ahmadinejad: US behind September 11 attacks

Iranian president delivers snappish speech at UN, says American administration planned Sept. 11 attacks to salvage US economy, Israel; Ahmadinejad slams 'Zionist crimes,' presents audience with anti-Western 'history lesson' Representatives of the US and other Western countries walked out during the speech to express their protest over the Iranian leader's “failure to uphold the official 9/11 Commission's version of September 11, 2001 added by: maasanova

Dear Senior Citizens, Turn off Fox and Pay Attention !

One of the biggest voting blocks in the country are our senior citizens the very people that will get screwed if the Republican Tea Party is allowed to take back congress this fall. Every voting cycle the voting block tat comes out to vote are our seniors, whether it's mid-term or presidential general. added by: kennymotown

Sarah Palin Drops The H-Bomb: ‘Barack Hussein Obama’ (VIDEO)

Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin made headlines for suggesting in a TV interview she'd run for president in 2012 “if nobody else were to step up,” but little noticed in that segment was the one-time vice presidential nominee dropping President Obama's middle name. Palin (R) managed to suggest Obama has a shady past and use his middle name — as his critics often did during the 2008 campaign — all in one quick hit with Fox News' Greta Van Susteren. “Funny, Greta, we are learning more about Christine O'Donnell and her college years and her teenage years and her financial dealings than anybody ever even bothered to ask about Barack Hussein Obama as a candidate and now as our president,” Palin said. Palin added later that it is “fair to dig in somebody's past.” She said that if the “lamestream media” did do that digging voters would “find out their associates and beliefs and what formed their beliefs.” It's certainly not the first time Palin has cracked about Obama's past, but we couldn't find any references to her using his middle name. Who can forget that Palin was the candidate to insist that Obama doesn't see America in the same way as she and Sen. John McCain. added by: TimALoftis

NPR Sneers Palin’s Fractured Lingo Shows She Avoids ‘Books and Periodicals That Have Semicolons’

From his usual perch on the NPR show Fresh Air, liberal linguist and Berkeley professor Geoffrey Nunberg  predictably sneered on Tuesday at Sarah Palin’s use of “refudiate,” and then her refusal to correct herself. He suggested she obviously doesn’t read enough. “You have to frequent the places the word hangs out in, the kinds of books and periodicals that have semicolons in them.” But he also tried to cover his tracks a little bit by suggesting eloquence is overrated in politicians: Palin could have picked up refudiate from someone else or come up with it on her own. The question is why she didn’t correct it along the way, before she got called on it and felt the need to defend it. After all, the course of our lives is strewn with abandoned misconceptions about words. I’m always struck by how tenacious these are. A word will go right past me five or 10 times before I suddenly have this duh moment. As in, duh, it has a ‘c’ in it. Or duh, compendious doesn’t mean comprehensive at all. But Palin apparently never had a duh moment with repudiate, probably because she hasn’t encountered it often enough. People don’t use it a lot in ordinary conversation – as in, I used to think Peter Frampton was cool, but I totally repudiate that now. You have to frequent the places the word hangs out in, the kinds of books and periodicals that have semicolons in them. [Note he places the emphasis on the second syllable of fre-QUENT. Thank you, Henry Higgins.] But not even Palin’s most ardent supporters would claim that she’s been a great reader. They prize her for her attitude and authenticity, not her erudition. Of course, there are other people who blanch at the thought of a head of state whose speech flows so far from the stream of literate English prose. Fair enough. But inarticulateness doesn’t preclude political competence – think of Dwight Eisenhower. As the linguist Mark Liberman put it in the LanguageLog blog, politics is not a vocabulary contest. And it’s a mistake to read too much significance into these slips and solecisms. Take the way the logotariat reacted to Palin’s use of verbage in place of verbiage during the 2008 campaign. It’s a very common error, and in its way a logical one. The i in verbiage doesn’t make a lot of sense if you think, as most people do, that the word is related to verb and verbal. It actually comes from the same root as warble. But in The New Yorker, James Wood took verbage as Palin’s own invention and called it a perfect example of the Republicans’ disdain for words. Verbage – so close to garbage, so far from language . That’s a pretty clever way for Nunberg to dull his Berkeley barbs and then stick Palin with another one. Nunberg realized there’s some political danger in smugness, even as he betrayed it: Where do you begin with that? With the remarkable condescension of garbage — so close to trash? Or with the insolence of imagining that faulty usage betrays stupidity and turpitude? One way or the other, it’s a form of smugness that transcends partisan lines. People on the right are just as quick to ridicule Obama and Biden for their mistakes. Yet the well-spoken aren’t necessarily wiser or better than the rest of us. Most of the horrors that the human race has had to endure in modern times were inflicted at the bidding of men who spoke in shapely grammatical sentences. Unfortunately, eloquence doesn’t come next to godliness. A devotion to language will have to be its own reward. Could we just celebrate that?

Read the original post:
NPR Sneers Palin’s Fractured Lingo Shows She Avoids ‘Books and Periodicals That Have Semicolons’

Paul the Octopus prediction

Octopus Paul on the boxes containing the Argentinian and German flags, as he makes his prediction of the winner for the Soccer World Cup quarterfinal match to be played in South Africa between Germany and Argentina on Saturday, in the SeaLife Aquarium in Oberhausen, Germany, Tuesday, June 29, 2010. The Octopus has proved to be a reliable oracle in the past – he predicted Germany’s win over Australia, Ghana and England as well as its loss to Serbia. During the 2008 European Championship, he predi

Here is the original post:
Paul the Octopus prediction

The Bachelorette: Faking Justin Rego’s Injury?

Maybe they call Justin Rego Rated R for Re-shot and Re-edited. On the June 7 episode of The Bachelorette, Ali Fedotowsky suitor Justin Rego famously limped, supposedly, to her mansion wearing a cast on his left foot. Or was it his right foot? That depends on what clip you watch! Hobbled wrestler Justin “Rated R” Rego was trekking up a hill one moment, then emerges in Ali’s talking-head moments later with it on the other foot. Hey, at least they didn’t show the cab dropping him off. Rated R Limps on Both Legs Pressed on this by Ryan Seacrest after some viewers noticed after the episode in question , host-pimp Chris Harrison admitted that it was staged … sort of. The editing was Harrison insists, but not the injury. “Our editing department

Original post:
The Bachelorette: Faking Justin Rego’s Injury?

Time Says Oil Spill is Everyone’s Fault But Big Government

The June 21 Time cover article told the sad stories of those affected by the BP oil spill and explored mistakes, mishaps and unfortunate events that have combined to compound the disaster. But in “ The Gulf Disaster: Who’s Asses Need Kicking? ” author Bryan Walsh went ultimately to spoiled American consumers both for refusing to grant government unlimited power over business, and for demanding mobility facilitated by inexpensive fuel. “We accept the business argument that regulation is an evil that isn’t necessary, rather than a necessary evil, and then we’re surprised when a rig blows and disaster ensues,” Walsh tutted. He called the current regulations “toothless” and explained that a current problem is, “the tendency of too many government overseers to get too friendly with the industry they’re supposed to be monitoring.” But it wasn’t just the lack of regulation. Walsh declared that, “And all of us bear responsibility too for depending on and demanding cheap oil underwritten by risky drilling while showing again and again at the ballot box that we wouldn’t support a government that really regulated the industry.” Walsh explained, “Of course, it’s our appetite for gas – cheap gas – that provides the hundreds of millions of dollars oil companies keep spending to drill offshore and the billions they make in profit. We buy gas-guzzling cars, resist the use of public transportation and howl at the ideal of carbon taxes or other measures that would bankroll research into alternative energy sources and make them more competitive once they reach the market.” Anything that needs government subsidy to exist in the marketplace is, by definition, uncompetitive. And the big solutions proposed by environmentalists wouldn’t just inconvenience consumers, they would cripple the U.S. economy. In 2009 Congress attempted to pass Cap-and-Trade , which would have created a trading market while attempting to cap carbon emissions.  The Heritage Foundation found that it would have cost not only a $9.6 billion in GDP loss, but over one million jobs by 2035. During the 2008 campaign, then-Senator Obama received $71,000 worth of donations from BP. And Walsh did acknowledge that Obama was among those to blame. But he complained that president was “too slow to seize control.”

Excerpt from:
Time Says Oil Spill is Everyone’s Fault But Big Government

MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough Continues Defense of Obama; Comparisons to Katrina ‘Obscene’

Joe Scarborough continued his open defense of the Obama administration’s response to the BP oil spill, on Wednesday’s “Morning Joe.” Facing off against Rep. Peter King (R-N.Y.), Scarborough called comparisons of the president’s handling of the current crisis with Bush’s handling of Katrina “obscene.” “Behind the scenes, President Obama from day one was actually very engaged,” Scarborough argued. “[Obama] told his White House staff ‘This is job one,’ ordered all of the agencies to throw the full force of the federal government behind this. I mean…we’ve got the minutes of the meeting from April 22 where he said that.” Rep. King countered that the administration lacked style in its handling of the crisis, and took eight days to declare it a “matter of national significance.” Though Scarborough said that President Obama has done everything of “substance” to respond to the spill, King also asked Scarborough what more President Bush could have done to handle the Katrina crisis. “What could George Bush have done?” Scarborough asked. “A hell of a lot.” “This is one of the most obscene comparisons, between Katrina and BP,” Scarborough spat out. “I was on the ground from day one. I can tell you the federal government was not there. The state government was not there. The local government was not there.” “No, you’re wrong, You’re wrong. That is not FEMA’s job,” Rep. King shot back. “That is the job of the mayor and the governor for the first two or three days.” A transcript of the show’s segment is as follows: MORNING JOE June 9, 2010 8:06a.m.–8:09a.m. JOE SCARBOROUGH: But–but–but Peter, you do understand–you do though understand, Peter, that behind the scenes President Obama from day one was actually very engaged, told his White House staff ‘this is job one,’ and ordered all of the agencies to throw the full force of the federal government behind this. I mean we’ve got that actual–we’ve got the minutes of the meeting from April 22 where he said that. MIKA BRZEZINSKI: It’s actually also in a press release released to the media. JOE SCARBOROUGH: Right. So is this about substance, or is this about style? REP. PETER KING (R-N.Y.): It’s both. It’s about leadership. And the fact is, it did take them–what–eight days to even declare this a matter of national significance. You know, leadership and style–Ronald Reagan had it, Franklin Roosevelt had it, John Kennedy had it, Bill Clinton had it in Oklahoma City. And you have to show–you have to connect with the American people. If you lose the American people on an issue like this, you’re going to hurt your administration, you know, for the next two years. SCARBOROUGH: So Peter, let me ask you, technically, can you name one thing that you would have done if you were running the White House operation technically, that Barack Obama did not do? REP. KING: I would have paid more attention to Gov. Jindal. I think Gov. Jindal is showing leadership, in fact, he wanted those berms off the coast. I think that is something that should have been done, that should have made more attention to him– SCARBOROUGH: But–but–but–but if you put the berms off the coast, that pushes the oil over to Mississippi. That may be great for Louisiana. I don’t think Haley would have liked that a whole hell of a lot. REP. KING: Well…the President should have engaged with Gov. Jindal. He didn’t engage with the Louisiana delegation, didn’t engage with Gov. Jindal, and he stayed away. And again, what more could President Bush have done with Katrina? The fact is, people like you are very critical of him. (Crosstalk) JOE SCARBOROUGH: Let me tell you–I’ll gladly tell you. I went down to Katrina the day after, and I can tell you unlike Florida, the year before, where we had four hurricanes, FEMA wasn’t there on the ground. The National Guard wasn’t there on the ground. (Crosstalk) SCARBOROUGH: This is one of the most obscene comparisons between Katrina and BP. I was on the ground from day one. I can tell you the federal government was not there. The state government was not there. The local government was not there. I saw children walking around in dirty diapers that they had been wearing for three days, four days. I saw kids wandering the streets of Biloxi and across Louisiana without any water, three days into it. What could George Bush have done? A hell of a lot. REP. KING: No, you’re wrong, you’re wrong. That is not FEMA’s job. That is the job of the mayor and the governor for the first two or three days. (Crosstalk) REP. KING: And you’re wrong, you’re wrong. SCARBOROUGH: No I’m not wrong! Peter! I’m in Pensacola, Florida. We have Ivan the year before and they’re flying supply planes in from Washington, D.C. the next day. Come on, Peter. I don’t tell you what’s happening in Long Island Sound. Don’t tell me what’s happening on the Gulf Coast. REP. KING: Joe, I’m telling you that everything that was done could have been done, until– the federal government does not come in until the third or fourth day. There was a failure of leadership by Mayor Nagin, by Governor Blanco, and Haley Barbour did a great job in Mississippi, Bob Riley did a great job in Alabama.     

Visit link:
MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough Continues Defense of Obama; Comparisons to Katrina ‘Obscene’