Tag Archives: Education

Analysis: Despite a Drying and Flooding Planet, Cancun Climate Negotiators Anticipate Scant Progress

On November 29 representatives from 190 countries will be in Cancun, Mexico for the 16th Conference of the Parties under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Late last week, following a two-day Major Economies Forum on Energy and Climate in Washington, the Obama administration’s chief climate negotiator told reporters not to expect too much. More than 125,000 demonstrators convened in the streets of Copenhagen last year, hoping their cheers and compelling testimonies would encourage swifter, more comprehensive action from negotiators.“I would describe myself right now as neither an optimist nor a pessimist,” said Todd Stern, the State Department’s special envoy on climate, adding that there won’t be any “enormous leaps forward” in Cancun but “real and concrete steps” can be made. Exactly what those could be has not come into focus, though Stern and other negotiators also noted that unless something tangible occurs at the Cancun meeting, the credibility of the UN process will weaken. “The process can’t continually stalemate and remain the locus of activity,” Stern said. A year ago, of course, global anticipation of a diplomatic breakthrough was high enough to attract the American president, the Chinese premier, and over 100 other heads of state to the Copenhagen climate summit. More than 125,000 people from all over the world marched for climate action on a cold and sunny Saturday afternoon. Thousands of journalists and producers filed reports from a crowded media room at the Bella Center, itself so full that security forces limited access. Yet what was clear in Copenhagen, just as it was plain in the two other international climate conferences I’ve attended — in Barcelona in 2009 and in Tianjin last month — is this: The very same governments that produced a near stalemate on a climate treaty are simultaneously supporting global alliances of powerful energy companies to develop and consume the planet’s remaining reserves of fossil fuels. Let’s just put it this way. The executives of those companies are perfectly content with the grudging pace of climate negotiations. Nobody else should be. The equatorial regions of east Africa are drying up as fast as the tinderbox hills and water-scarce fields of Australia’s Murray Darling Basin. Both poles are melting along with the glaciers of Greenland and the Himalayas. South Dakota this year experienced floods and hail and fierce storms that formed the most erratic and dangerous weather in its recorded history. The damage to freshwater supplies is the most personal consequence of climate change around the world. Climate change, in fact, is producing an emergency, except in the front offices of the world’s major fossil fuel companies and the legions of elected and appointed officials they’ve helped to install in public office. And as Circle of Blue reports in its Choke Point: U.S. series this year, and in its other projects, there is no more visible evidence than the effect climate change is having on the planet’s reserves of fresh water. In the U.S., persistent drought on the Colorado Plateau has so significantly lowered water levels in the Colorado River and Lake Mead that Hoover Dam is fast approaching the day when it will no longer produce any power. In Myanmar and Bangladesh, record floods this year displaced hundreds of thousands of people. The damage to freshwater supplies is the most personal consequence of climate change around the world. It’s true that a number of nations have initiated important industrial programs to lower carbon emissions by fostering the switch to cleaner energy sources. China, for instance, has gained international renown for the speed at which it’s developed an alternative fuels manufacturing and power-generating sector. It’s not nearly enough, though, to slow the planet’s warming. That’s because the bigger money in the industrialized world involves producing and consuming carbon-emitting coal, oil, and natural gas. cont. added by: JanforGore

Man Charged in Sodomy of Pit Bull to Stand Trial

Reports Say Man's Court-Appointed Attorney Hopes to Use Insanity as Defense (AP) A 59-year-old western Michigan parolee will stand trial in the sodomy of his pet pit bull. The Muskegon Chronicle reports Friday that a two-day jury trial is scheduled Jan. 4 for Jose Sanchez in the 14th Circuit Court. Sanchez' parole officer was told the pet dog was sexually assaulted Aug. 2. The Muskegon man is charged with one count of sodomy, a 15-year felony. The newspaper reports that Sanchez' court-appointed attorney hopes to use insanity as a defense. Results of an evaluation by the Michigan Center for Forensic Psychiatry were not available. The pit bull has been placed with an animal rescue group. A state corrections website says Sanchez was paroled last year after being convicted in 1998 of second-degree sexual assault involving a person under 13. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/11/26/national/main7092507.shtml?tag=cbsnews… added by: Sparky2U

Brass Monki Custom Shoes

Brass Monkey, aka Daniel Reese, has designed some amazing looking shoes. Take a look 'em! added by: Geoffiroth

Israeli Army use Facebook to track down female draft dodgers

Facebook stalking is now being used as a tool by the Israeli army to expose women who lie about their religious background in order to avoid military service.According to reports more than 1,000 women have been tracked down after they falsely claimed they were exempt from the draft because they were Orthodox Jews.Military service is compulsory for most Israelis over the age of 18 – three years for men and two years for women.But to avoid having to join people can cite a variety of reasons – one of them is an exemption for Orthodox, or religiously observant, Jews.Using Facebook, the Israeli army is checking women's status updates and photos to confirm if such claims are genuine.A senior Israeli officer said they had found examples of young women who had declared themselves exempt posting photographs of themselves on Facebook in immodest clothing, or eating in non-kosher restaurants.Others were caught by responding to party invitations on Friday nights – the Jewish Sabbath.It is estimated that more than 35% of Jewish women in Israel do not join the army, because they say they are religious – but the army suspects that thousands of them are, in fact secular and eligible to serve. added by: sbacker

Don’t buy this watch by Mike Shanklin

Here's a great video of Mike talking about statism and how it uses taxation (theft) to fund its activities (i.e. protectionism, war, and prohibition.) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HGKDNc-TJmw added by: ed2point0

Obama as Nataraj creates furore among US Hindus

A picture of US President Barack Obama on the cover page of an American weekly news magazine 'Newsweek' has created a lot of criticism. On the cover page President Obama is depicted as Hindu Lord Nataraj. link:http://www.breakingnewsonline.net/world/5357-obama-as-nataraj-creates-furore-among-us-hindus.html added by: Kristena

The Anticipatron: Burlesque

Visit link:
The Anticipatron: Burlesque

U.S. Attorney Ben Wagner: <br>An Extended Interview

U.S. Attorney Ben Wagner tells Adam Yamaguchi that even a major drug bust may at first have only a minor impact on trafficking organizations. MONDAY 9/8c

Read the original post:
U.S. Attorney Ben Wagner: <br>An Extended Interview

Growing Marijuana on California’s Public Land

Adam Yamaguchi embeds with MAVMIT, an elite task force that hikes into the California wilderness in search of marijuana grow sites operated by Mexican drug trafficking organizations. MONDAY 9/8c

See the original post:
Growing Marijuana on California’s Public Land

FDA will Ban Food Makers from Telling the Truth about Non-GMO Foods

(NaturalNews) In case anyone had any doubts about who the FDA really serves, the latest news should prove once and for all whose side they are on – and it isn't yours or mine. The Washington Post has reported that, in addition to ultimately approving genetically modified “Frankenfish” salmon without requiring a GMO label, the FDA will also be banning the inclusion of any references to not containing genetically modified content on food items which are GMO free. The FDA, which has been under intense pressure from GM interests to approve the modified salmon without requiring any labeling, stated that it could not require a label on the salmon because the agency determined that the altered fish are not “materially different” from other salmon. Apparently, the agency is using even the same, and even flimsier, justifications to force food companies to hide the truth if their products are GM/GMO free – much to the delight of the multi-billion dollar GM industries. We should have seen such an outrageous decision coming, given the FDA's past record and continued turn away from protecting consumers' health in favor of industry profits from drug and food companies who are obviously its true clients and masters. In 1994 the agency warned the dairy industry that it could not use “Hormone Free” labeling on milk from cows that are not given engineered hormones. It claimed all milk contains some hormones. The FDA told one canola oil maker that it could not use a label that included a red circle with a line through it and the words “GMO,” saying the symbol suggested that there was something wrong with genetically engineered food. It has also recently sent a flurry of enforcement letters to food makers telling them they could not use phrases such as “GMO-free” on their labels, including a food maker which produces an all fruit strawberry spread. In the case of the strawberry spread, the FDA reasoned that the label would be incorrect because GMO refers to genetically modified organisms and strawberries are produce, not organisms. “This to me raises questions about whose interest the FDA is protecting,” House Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) told the Washington Post. Kucinich has repeatedly introduced bills in the House that would require the labeling of genetically modified food but has been unable to overcome the money and influence of the GMO lobbies and companies. The FDA's anticipated actions come at a time when consumers increasingly want to know the content of their foods. In fact, polls consistently show that more than 80% of Americans want genetically engineered foods to be labeled. It also comes at a time when more and more studies are demonstrating the health and environmental dangers of GMO foods. “The public wants to know and the public has a right to know,” New York University nutrition professor Marion Nestle told the Post. “I think the agency has discretion, but it's under enormous political pressure to approve [the salmon] without labeling.” Not surprisingly, the GM industry agrees wholeheartedly with the FDA. As one director of animal biotechnology said, “Extra labeling only confuses the consumer. … It differentiates products that are not different [and] makes it harder for consumers to make their choices.” In other words, make it easier for consumers to make choices by limiting their information. Forget about health dangers, our right to know, or the constitutional rights to free speech (which the Supreme Court has ruled includes commercial free speech in anti-FDA decisions). The FDA simply wants to protect us poor consumers from being confused. Who do you think the FDA is really protecting? ~~~ Here's more about the man who is now, thanks to Obama and his debt to Monsanto, in charge of your food safety http://www.grist.org/article/2009-07-08-monsanto-FDA-taylor added by: samantha420