Tag Archives: faith

Ground Zero Imam’s Group Trained NY Times Mosque Reporter

A New York Times reporter, who co-authored two fawning articles on the Ground Zero mosque in 2009 and 2010, previously attended a media training program run by the mosque’s organizer, Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, according to the group’s website. The journalist, Sharaf Mowjood, participated in an April, 2009 media training program led by Rauf’s American Society for Muslim Advancement (ASMA), reported the Investigative Project on Terrorism on Sept. 20. Rauf founded ASMA in 1997, and currently serves as the group’s CEO. Mowjood’s first article on the controversial Ground Zero mosque – a glowing, 1,200-word piece titled ” Muslim Prayers and Renewal Near Ground Zero ” – was co-authored with Ralph Blumenthal in December, 2009. All eight of the sources cited in the piece said they approved of the Ground Zero project or lauded its leader Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf. Mowjood was also a contributing reporter to a flattering front-page profile on Rauf that ran in the Times on Aug. 22. ASMA, which ran the “Muslim Leaders of Tomorrow” media training session that Mowjood attended, pointed to the reporter’s work as evidence that its training program was effective. “Media trainings showed immediate results,” claimed a 2009 report on the ASMA website, noting that “Sharaf Mawjood [sic], a journalism student at Columbia University and trained at the [Muslim Leaders of Tomorrow] conference, wrote a compelling story about the Muslim community’s plan to establish a center near Ground Zero. The story was published on the front page of the New York Times with Sharaf as co-author.” According to the ASMA website, the conference “focused specifically on the media. It offered participants a diverse range of intensive media trainings, imparting the [Muslim Leaders of Tomorrow] in attendance with concrete tools to become effective media spokespeople.” The website said that the conference was held in partnership with the Cordoba Initiative, the organization behind the Ground Zero mosque – which is another group led by Rauf. The Times’ Metro editor Joe Sexton denied that Mowjood was trained by ASMA, telling the IPT that the reporter “attended a lecture sponsored by ASMA in 2008. He was not a presenter or participant. He signed the sign-in sheet.” But the IPT noted that a photo from the event, which shows Mowjood seated at a conference table littered with papers while watching another participant speak, “indicates the session was more than a lecture.” In addition to his ties with ASMA, Times’ reporter Mowjood also held a government lobbying position at the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) up until at least March of 2008. CAIR, which calls itself a “grassroots civil rights and advocacy group,” has come under fire in the past for its alleged ties to international terrorist organizations. Excerpts from Mowjood’s work could possibly pass as press releases for groups like CAIR or ASMA. His Times articles were extremely favorable toward Rauf and the Ground Zero mosque. “Those who have worked with [the imam] say if anyone could pull off what many regard to be a delicate project, it would be Imam Feisal [Rauf], whom they described as having built a career preaching tolerance and interfaith understanding,” read Mowjood’s enthusiastically pro-Rauf article written in December, 2009. Mowjood’s story made no mention of legitimate criticisms of the planned mosque. Instead, opponents of the prayer center were sources of potential anti-Muslim violence. “[T]here is anxiety among those involved or familiar with the project that it could very well become a target for anti-Muslim attacks,” wrote Mowjood and his co-author Ralph Blumenthal. “Joan Brown Campbell …who is a supporter of Imam Feisal, acknowledged the possibility of a backlash from those opposed to a Muslim presence at ground zero.” Mowjood was also a contributing reporter to an Aug. 22 Times article on Rauf, in which the imam is described as the leader of “a truly American brand of Islam [that] could modernize and moderate the faith worldwide.” The 1,900-word article quotes no critics of the mosque, featuring mainly friends of Rauf who say things like “[he] is an excellent schmoozer” and “[to] stereotype him as an extremist is just nuts.” Mowjood’s background as a CAIR lobbyist, as well as his attendance at an ASMA media training event, may conflict with the Times’ ethical standards. The paper’s code of ethics says that reporters “should be vigilant in avoiding any activity that might pose an actual or apparent conflict of interest and thus threaten the newspaper’s ethical standing.”

Original post:
Ground Zero Imam’s Group Trained NY Times Mosque Reporter

CNN: Vatican Conducting ‘Inquisition’ Against Dissenting Nuns

On Friday’s American Morning, CNN’s Carol Costello followed up on her biased report from the previous day , which promoted Catholic women posing as priests, with a second report on dissenting Catholics, focusing on heterodox nuns inside the U.S. Costello promoted the claim of the nuns, who accuse the Vatican of conducting an ” inquisition ,” or wanting to ” silence nuns when they disagree with the Pope .” Substitute anchor Drew Griffin gave a brief on Pope Benedict XVI’s second day in the U.K. 25 minutes into the 6 am Eastern hour, just before his colleague Kiran Chetry introduced the correspondent’s report. Chetry proclaimed how the Vatican is apparently ” squarely at odds with American nuns ,” and that many of these nuns ” feel they’re under siege from the Church, which is questioning the quality of their religious life .” Costello picked up where the anchor left off: “[T]he Vatican is now conducting two sweeping investigations of American nuns…the Vatican hopes to have a better understanding of how nuns live their lives in the United States. Nuns don’t see it that way, though. Many think these investigations are nothing short of interrogations, designed to take away all they’ve gained .” Costello led her report by featuring Sister Maureen Fiedler, a liberal public radio host who attended the “ordination” of seven women on the Danube River in 2002. Fiedler stated during her first sound bite, “Some of my friends asked me why the Vatican officials suffer from a deep seed hatred of women .” The correspondent continued by describing how “the Vatican ordered two sweeping investigations into the religious views and lifestyles of American nuns- investigations that have alarmed many sisters like Marlene Weisenbeck, whose organization represents thousands of American nuns across the country.” Sister Weisenbeck was president of the Leadership Council of Women Religious until August 2010. She led the organization when it endorsed ObamaCare , contrary to the stance of the U.S. bishops’ conference. Costello played two sound bites from the nun during her report. After reading some of the questions from a questionnaire which was sent as part of the investigations, and playing a second clip from Sister Fiedler, the CNN correspondent described how at “this year’s Leadership Conference of Women Religious (LCWR), some nuns say these investigations feel like an inquisition, and are fighting back by boycotting all or part of the questionnaire.” She continued by reading Fiedler’s “fears” over the investigations: “Fiedler says many nuns, who haven’t lived in convents or worn habits since the 1950s, fear the Vatican wants to force them back into both . She also fears Rome wants to silence nuns when they disagree with the Pope on issues like gays in the Church or women’s rights , something the Church now allows them to do.” Later in her report, Costello played two clips from Father Joseph Tobin of the Vatican’s Congregation for Religious, who was also featured in her Thursday report on women “priests.” He again gave mild responses to the correspondent. Near the end of the segment, the CNN correspondent noted how “CNN analyst John Allen tells us he expects the Vatican investigations will wrap up by December, and adds if the Vatican wants nuns to return to more conservative lives, they should just be patient, because young women, who are considering sisterhood, are more conservative than their elders .” But Costello featured none of these more orthodox nuns during her report, such as those represented by another umbrella group of nuns, the Council of Major Superiors of Women Religious. The president of the Council, Mother Mary Quentin Sheridan, expressed her support of the American bishops’ opposition to ObamaCare , contrary to the stance of the LCWR. Griffin asked Costello a bizarre final question: “You know, Carol, what’s interesting about this is- these women, who are in the Catholic Church, have been fighting with the Church forever for a greater role, in taking part of this. But are there any financial ties between these nuns and the Vatican? I thought that nuns in this country pretty much were financially independent and had to raise money on their own. So, I’m wondering just why they even care what the Vatican says? ” Well, if these nuns want to consider themselves Catholic and appear to be Catholic, they should care what the hierarchy of their own Church says and support its teachings, something that many of the nuns who are part of the LCWR refuse to do. The full transcript of Carol Costello’s report from Friday’s American Morning: GRIFFIN: Welcome back. This is the ‘Most News in the Morning,’ and it is day two of Pope Benedict’s historic trip to Britain. There he is meeting with students at a Catholic school today, and then religious leaders in London. Yesterday, for the first time, the Pope admitted the Church failed in handling priest sex abuse cases. He’s expected to meet with victims tomorrow. CHETRY: Well, in this country, the Vatican is squarely at odds with American nuns. Many of them feel they’re under siege from the Church, which is questioning the quality of their religious life, and the sisters are having their say. Carol Costello is live in Washington with an “A.M. Original” for us this morning. Hey, Carol. CAROL COSTELLO: Good morning- CHETRY: So what’s going on with the Vatican and the nuns? COSTELLO: Well, Kiran, the Vatican is now conducting two sweeping investigations of American nuns. The latest round of ‘visitations’ are now underway, and the Vatican hopes to have a better understanding of how nuns live their lives in the United States. Nuns don’t see it that way, though. Many think these investigations are nothing short of interrogations, designed to take away all they’ve gained. SISTER MAUREEN FIEDLER: Some of my friends asked me why the Vatican officials suffer from a deep seed hatred of women. COSTELLO (voice-over): On Sister Maureen Fielder’s Washington radio show- FIEDLER: Could they be serious? COSTELLO: The role of women in the Catholic Church is a popular one. The talk has been heated ever since the Vatican ordered two sweeping investigations into the religious views and lifestyles of American nuns- investigations that have alarmed many sisters like Marlene Weisenbeck, whose organization represents thousands of American nuns across the country. SISTER MARLENE WEISENBECK, LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE OF WOMEN RELIGIOUS: We weren’t quite expecting to walk into this kind of a process that would test our authenticity and our integrity. COSTELLO: One of the investigations involved a two-part questionnaire consisting of 120 detailed questions like, ‘What is the process for responding to sisters who dissent publicly from Church teaching and discipline?’ ‘How does the matter of the dress of your sisters lend to the dignity and simplicity of your vocation?’ And this, ‘What are the procedures for dealing with matters such as civil disobedience, criminal activity, sexual improprieties, et cetera?’ FIEDLER: I think they want to be able to control what nuns do. They- you know, in every aspect of their lives. COSTELLO: (women singing) At this year’s Leadership Conference of Women Religious, some nuns say these investigations feel like an inquisition, and are fighting back by boycotting all or part of the questionnaire. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Okay. Are we ready for prayer? COSTELLO: Fiedler says many nuns, who haven’t lived in convents or worn habits since the 1950s, fear the Vatican wants to force them back into both. She also fears Rome wants to silence nuns when they disagree with the Pope on issues like gays in the Church or women’s rights, something the Church now allows them to do. FATHER JOSEPH TOBIN, CONGREGATION FOR RELIGIOUS: Some of it might be a very deep seeded misunderstanding. COSTELLO: The Vatican is hoping that Father Tobin, who was just appointed the number two official for religious life, can help calm the fear surrounding these investigations. TOBIN: There is a need for a dialogue, and I think dialogue means that the two parties are honestly conversing in search of the truth. COSTELLO: Sister Marlene hopes that’s true, but- WEISENBECK: There is no turning back. I don’t think that that happens in any kind of living organism. God doesn’t turn the Church- doesn’t turn creation in opposite directions. COSTELLO (live): In other words, there is no turning back the clock for American nuns. Our CNN analyst, John Allen, tells us he expects the Vatican investigations will wrap up by December, and adds if the Vatican wants nuns to return to more conservative lives, they should just be patient, because young women, who are considering sisterhood, are more conservative than their elders. And many, Kiran, are even willing to return to wearing habits, although, convents- maybe not so much. CHETRY: That’s interesting. And what is the fallout, if anything, about boycotting all or part of that questionnaire you were referring to? COSTELLO: You know, we don’t know. Everything surrounding these investigations is quite mysterious. The Vatican isn’t talking much about it. But they’re hoping that Father Tobin can calm fears and get more nuns to answer the questionnaires and also to answer- you know, there are going to be people from the Vatican coming in and having one-on-one conversations with nuns, and they’re hoping that the nuns will feel comfortable doing that if their fears are- you know, calmed down somewhat. We’ll just have to see. We don’t know. GRIFFIN: You know, Carol, what’s interesting about this is- these women, who are in the Catholic Church, have been fighting with the Church forever for a greater role, in taking part of this. But are there any financial ties between these nuns and the Vatican? I thought that nuns in this country pretty much were financially independent and had to raise money on their own. So, I’m wondering just why they even care what the Vatican says? COSTELLO: Well, I think you’ve hit the nail on the head, and the Vatican is certainly aware of that because nuns own universities. They own their own property. They very much- you know, work for charity and social justice issues. They’re very much on their own and independent, yet they’re very important to the Church, because they do a lot of work inside the Church and for Catholicism worldwide. So, the Vatican wants to keep them. The nuns know that they have a certain amount of financial power, and they don’t really need the Vatican. But- you know, they’re loyal Catholics, and it’s not like they want to split from the Church or anything. They love Catholicism. So, hopefully, all will be mended soon. But these investigations- nobody knows exactly why they’re being conducted, and that’s just creating all of this turmoil that doesn’t necessarily have to be there. GRIFFIN: Yeah. Well, thanks, Carol. I mean, there is the faith and then there is the Catholic organization, and I guess that’s where the two are disjointed from each other at the moment. But it’s been an interesting couple of days- couple of [unintelligible]. Thanks so much for that. COSTELLO: Thank you.

The rest is here:
CNN: Vatican Conducting ‘Inquisition’ Against Dissenting Nuns

NPR Compares Palin, Gingrich to Historic Anti-Semites, Sympathizes with Former CAIR Publicist

National Public Radio is strongly urging America to get over its apparently rabid case of Islamophobia. On Sunday night’s All Things Considered  newscast, anchor  Guy Raz played audio clips of Newt Gingrich and Sarah Palin opposing the Ground Zero Mosque, and then launched into how much this resembles historic anti-Semitism: In his column today, New York Times writer Nicholas Kristof points out that in 1940, 17 percent of the population considered Jews to be a menace to America. Almost every ethnic group in this country has gone through a period of transition when they had to fight to prove that, indeed, they were Americans. Rabiah Ahmed and a group of Muslim leaders thought their community had to do the same today. So this week, they launched an online video campaign called “My Faith, My Voice.” What Raz does not point out is that Rabiah Ahmed is a former publicist and prominent national spokesperson for the Council for Islamic-American Relations (CAIR), a group named as an un-indicted co-conspirator in a terrorist funding case. Raz didn’t so much conduct a news interview with Rabiah Ahmed as much as he joined her in condemning the sad and bigoted state of America today:    RAZ: Rabiah, how did it get to this point, you know, where, in a sense, you’re stating what should be painfully obvious, that people who practice the Muslim faith in America are Americans just like anyone else ? Ms. AHMED: You know, it is sad that it has to be said, but it’s necessary nonetheless because this rhetoric, these anti-Muslim feelings, they’re not just coming from the usual right-wing or agenda-driven circles. Polls indicate that these fears are widespread. They’re in the hearts of average Americans, moderate Americans. And that’s what’s so concerning about this. In the post-9/11 climate, there was anti-Muslim backlash, but it wasn’t so open. It wasn’t so hostile, and it wasn’t so widespread. And whatever the Muslim community has been doing in the past 10 years, it’s been a good effort, but for some reason, it’s not achieving its goal. RAZ: Do you think, as a society, we’re in the midst of maybe a passing storm, you know, something that we will look back on in 10 or 20 years from now and wonder how it ever came to this ? Ms. AHMED: I hope so. I hope it is a passing storm. I hope that it’s just a matter of time where Muslims are seen as part and parcel of the society. You know, if we look back at our history, other communities have faced this kind of discrimination or these kinds of feelings, and they’ve been able to overcome. But it’s not going to happen by itself. The Muslim community is going to really have to reach out in different ways, you know, through interfaith relations, through public service announcements, through whatever way that people can contribute and try to address these issues because if it’s not done, then there’s a potential of it just getting worse. RAZ: That’s Rabiah Ahmed. She’s one of the people behind a new online video campaign called “My Faith, My Voice.”  Rabiah Ahmed, thank you so much. Ms. AHMED: Thank you for having me. The “My Faith, My Voice” organizers claimed they are absolutely unaffiliated. But is Ahmed or her Mirza Public Relations firm being paid, and if so, by whom? NPR’s anchor didn’t care enough to ask, at least not for the public. Before this sympathetic exchange, Raz explained “In a few moments, we’ll find out why Muslims in one grassroots movement have decided to remind their fellow Americans that, well, they’re Americans too.” But first, he found some American Muslims who found the current rhetorical environment is endangering their safety: HUSSEIN NAGAMEA(ph): My name is Hussein Nagamea. I have no time since my immigration to the United States felt that I was unsafe in this country until now, recently. BARBARA KHANDAKAR: I am careful about who I talk to in public, not so much just talking to them, but other Muslims that I greet, I don’t automatically go say, hi, assalamu alaikum, because I don’t want to draw attention to myself that I’m Muslim or that they’re Muslim, just in case someone out there might be crazy. ZIYA NASIR: You kind of feel afraid that everyone thinks that way, you know, everyone who’s not Muslim believes that. That is probably the most frightening out of everything. So this is how it works at taxpayer-supported radio. If you’re non-Muslim and think Muslims are endangering your safety, you’re a bigot. If you’re Muslim and you think non-Muslims are endangering your safety, you’re handed a microphone and a pat on the back.

The rest is here:
NPR Compares Palin, Gingrich to Historic Anti-Semites, Sympathizes with Former CAIR Publicist

Faith Evans Charged with DUI

Filed under: Faith Evans , Celebrity Justice Faith Evans — a singer once married to The Notorious B.I.G. — has been charged with two counts of DUI … TMZ has learned. The L.A. City Attorney filed the case.

WaPo Front Page Implies Beck Can’t Lead Christian Right: He’s Not Really a Christian

The Washington Post put Glenn Beck on the front page again Tuesday with the headline “Beck’s marriage of politics and religion raising questions: Commentator may be unlikely leader for conservative Christians.” Post religion correspondent Michelle Boorstein underlined why: Beck’s Mormonism. He sounded like an evangelist at his rally, and “Yet the Mormon convert seems an unlikely leader for conservative Christians, many of whom don’t regard Mormonism as part of their faith.” It’s clear that the Post editors are furious that Beck questioned Barack Obama’s claim to “committed” Christianity, so they are turning the tables. That theme runs through the whole Boorstein story, which raised the question if Beck had “seized the mantle of the religious right.” Salem Radio hosts and executives clearly aren’t a stable of Beck fans: “Politically, everyone is with it, but theologically, when he says the country should turn back to God, the question is: Which God?” said Tom Tradup, vice president for news and talk at Salem Radio Network, which serves more than 2,000 mostly Christian stations. “How much of this is turning to God? How much is religious revival and how much is a snake oil medicine show?” Boorstein also quoted Salem host Janet Mefferd, who was just picked up nationally by Salem in March. (Beck’s radio show is syndicated by Premiere Radio Networks.) Boorstein left the Salem affiliation out of the Mefferd quote. She didn’t like his talk of divine destiny: “I’m a little nervous about that kind of talk,” said Janet Mefferd, a nationally syndicated Christian talk show host who said most callers Monday wanted to talk about Beck. “I know he means well and loves this country, but he doesn’t know enough about theology to know what kind of effect he’s having. Christians are hearing something different than what he thinks he’s saying.” Mefferd’s website also links to an article insisting if Beck truly embraces Mormonism, he is not a Christian. The Post’s On Faith blog was explicit in a headline: Is Obama a Christian? Is Beck?  Glenn Beck, a Mormon, says Obama is not a Christian. It’s not uncommon for Christians to question Mormon theology. What’s uncommon is a liberal newspaper like The Washington Post suggesting someone’s not Christian enough for the Christian right. It’s like letting abortion advocates pick who leads the pro-life movement. The first Christian leader featured in the story was Richard Land of the Southern Baptist Convention, who found Beck’s attempt to get the blessings of religious-right leaders “extraordinary…I’ve never heard a cultural figure of that popularity taking that overtly about his faith. He sounded like Billy Graham.” Boorstein later added: Although he doesn’t consider Mormons to be Christians, Land said he agrees with Beck’s basic premise that American society must be “rebuilt from the bottom up.” Land accepted an invitation to be part of a group of more than 200 clergy members whom Beck calls his “Black Robed Regiment,” a reference to pastors from the Revolutionary War who stirred up opposition to colonial rule. Asked who would be considered conservative Christian leaders today – with Graham in his 90s and the recent death of Jerry Falwell – Land said that “leaders are leaders because people follow them. Obviously, Glenn Beck is a leader. He’s in a category by himself. He’s not a minister, he’s not a politician.” The most ridiculous sentence in Boorstein’s story is yet another lame definition of “liberation” theology: To those who embrace it, liberation theology is a means to empower the poor, the weak and politically oppressed. The term became politicized during the 2008 presidential campaign because it is used by Obama’s controversial former pastor, Jeremiah A. Wright Jr. As Stanley Kurtz noted, “Theologically,” Wright’s theological hero James Cone affirms, “Malcolm X was not far wrong when he called the white man ‘the devil.'” Cone also wrote : “If God is not for us and against White people, then he is a murderer, and we had better kill him. The task of Black theology is to kill Gods who do not belong to the Black community … Black theology will accept only the love of God which participates in the destruction of the white enemy.” But The Washington Post thinks all the religious controversy belongs with Beck, not Barack Obama’s longtime pastor.

Read the original post:
WaPo Front Page Implies Beck Can’t Lead Christian Right: He’s Not Really a Christian

Glenn Beck Pushing God and Gold Once Again

Glenn Beck loves to trick as many people as possible into buying worthless gold from Goldline. Today he used an interesting strategy to pimp out the sponsor to his listeners. Beck basically said that if you put your faith in God then you definitely should entertain the idea of investing in Goldline. After all, you never know the direction the economy will go and it's always a good idea to have a useless “investment” sitting around. http://dauntingideas.com/content/glenn-beck-pushing-god-and-gold-once-again added by: Spiricle23

Faith Evans Says She’s ‘Fine And Well’ After Arrest

‘I am on the set of my new video,’ the R&B singer tweets, thanking fans for support after weekend drunken driving charge. By James Dinh Faith Evans Photo: Jim Spellman/WireImage When it comes to R&B singers these days, personal troubles seem to be the least of their worries. Fantasia was ready to promote her album just weeks after her reported suicide attempt. And now Faith Evans says she’s resuming work on her new music video just days after her arrest on suspicion of misdemeanor drunken driving. The singer took to Twitter to thank fans for their well-wishes and assured them that a music video is still on the way. “Hi Faithfuls…I am on the set of my new video for my single “Gone Already”. I’m sure by now most of you heard that I was detained on suspicion of a DUI,” she tweeted on Monday (August 23). “After completing a full day of wardrobe prep I was stopped at a random checkpoint. I’m fine and well, and thank you for your prayers, kind words and concerns. I can’t wait for you all to see my new video & look forward to hearing from u guys…Fizzy,” she continued. On Saturday, Evans was pulled over at a checkpoint near Marina del Rey in Los Angeles and arrested on suspicion of misdemeanor drunken driving where she was then taken into police custody at 10:40 p.m. According to The Associated Press, the singer’s car was impounded as she was held for a few hours before being released on bail the following morning. In addition to working on new music, the singer is reportedly filming her own reality show , titled “It’s All About Faith,” which will follow Evans as she makes her return to the music scene. Are you looking forward to new music from R&B diva Faith Evans? Tell us in the comments. Related Artists Faith Evans

See the rest here:
Faith Evans Says She’s ‘Fine And Well’ After Arrest

Michael Jackson Fans — Protest Set for Dr. Murray Hearing

Filed under: Conrad Murray , Michael Jackson , Celebrity Justice Dr. Conrad Murray won’t just face the judge in his manslaughter case on Monday — we’re told an army of MJ fans plans a little surprise of its own … in the protest department. A rep for Justice4MJ — the fan group planning the demonstration — tells… Read more

View original post here:
Michael Jackson Fans — Protest Set for Dr. Murray Hearing

Police Have Faith Evans on DUI Bust

Filed under: Faith Evans , Celebrity Justice TMZ has learned Faith Evans is in LAPD custody for an alleged DUI tonight. According to law enforcement sources, the singer was stopped at a DUI checkpoint near the Marina Del Rey section of L.A. when officers detected alcohol.

Time’s Sullivan Defends Obama’s Christianity, Attacks Conservatives for Perception by Some He’s Muslim

The number of Americans from all kinds of demographics who are unsure that President Obama is a Christian have grown since he’s been in office. For instance, “fewer than half of Democrats (46%) know Obama is a Christian, down from 55% in March 2009. Barely four-in-ten African-Americans say he’s a Christian, down from 56% last year,” an exasperated Amy Sullivan noted in an August 19 Swampland blog post at Time.com. So who’s fault is that? Conservatives, of course, the religion reporter insisted: It would also be foolish and naive to pretend that conservatives who call Obama a Muslim are doing it in a neutral way and that their intention is anything other than to raise questions about his “otherness.” Sullivan failed to name which prominent conservatives in particular she felt were responsible for moving public opinion on the president’s religious loyalties. But in her zeal to vigorously defend Obama as a follower of Christ, Sullivan concluded by asserting that the White House has to take care to “offset those perceptions [that Obama is secretly a Muslim] with a little more openness about the president’s real Christian faith.”   Perhaps Sullivan was being extremely charitable and wished to avoid rank cynicism, but not once did it occur to her that President Obama might be an agnostic who, like many Americans, nominally associates with the Christian faith because it’s a proper thing to do.   Prior to his presidency, might President Obama have attended — albeit infrequently — Trinity United Church of Christ out of a mix of a vague sense of social and familial obligation and political calculus? Sullivan leaves that possibility unexplored.   To her mind, Obama is unquestionably a Christian and that story must be put out there by the White House PR shop in order to bolster Obama’s connection with the electorate (emphasis mine): I suppose you could call the White House’s complete lack of concern about Obama’s religious image admirable. It wouldn’t be hard to imagine a crafty political adviser marching into the Oval Office and insisting: “Mr. President, I’m sorry, but we have to have you walking into a church every Sunday morning, preferably with a big Bible under your arm.” And i n a perfect world, nobody would give a hoot whether the president went to church or said grace before meals or ever uttered one word publicly about his religious beliefs. But these Pew results suggest that nearly two years after Americans elected Obama, they know less about him than they did when he was a presidential candidate still making his way onto their radar. Forget the question of what that means for 2012– it’s already a problem for a leader who wants to connect with the country. One last note on another finding I found fascinating: Of those Americans who think Obama is a Muslim, nearly one-quarter (24%) told Pew pollsters they think he talks about his faith too much. Which is impossible, of course, because Obama is not a Muslim, so he’s spent exactly zero minutes talking about being one. What the result really illustrates is how thoroughly those who oppose Obama are willing to read everything he says and does through a filter of distrust. Sixty percent of those who think Obama is a Muslim say they got that idea from the media. But interestingly, one-in-ten say they got it from Obama’s own behavior or words. They hear the Cairo speech or see the outreach to Muslim countries and assume, well of course, it’s because he’s Muslim. That doesn’t mean he shouldn’t engage in the outreach–far from it. But it does make it even more important for the White House to offset those perceptions with a little more openness about the president’s real Christian faith.

View post:
Time’s Sullivan Defends Obama’s Christianity, Attacks Conservatives for Perception by Some He’s Muslim