Tag Archives: foreign-policy

Commentary (Jonathan Powers): Why the United States Needs to Free Itself from Oil

Why America needs to free itself from oil By Jonathan Powers, Special to CNN July 4, 2010 9:37 a.m. EDT Photo: An oil refinery in Los Angeles, seen before dawn. Editor's note: Jonathan Powers, a veteran of the war in Iraq, is the chief operating officer for the Truman National Security Project, which describes itself as an organization that “recruits, trains, and positions a new generation of progressives across America to lead on national security.” . (CNN) — For two years in a row, I celebrated Independence Day in the oppressive heat of Iraq along with fellow soldiers. A few nonalcoholic beers and some locally grown watermelon were our replacement for hot dogs and potato salad. This year, as Americans across the nation celebrate July Fourth with barbecues and fireworks, those most responsible for defending our independence, the military, will continue to fight two wars. And it is a shame that we will let yet another July Fourth pass us by without making substantial progress toward ending our unnecessary dependence on oil, a dependence that is funding the bullets that our enemies fire at our troops in Iraq and Afghanistan. It is for that reason, and many more, that the fight for energy independence is being fought here at home, a struggle I hope more Americans will join in support of those who are fighting abroad. Oil poses a clear threat to America's economic and national security. This spring we have watched as untold millions of gallons of oil flowed into the Gulf. But for years, we have watched as billions of dollars flowed to hostile nations to pay for oil. Every day, we send well over a billion dollars out of this country to pay for oil — money that could and should be used to grow our economy and create jobs. The simple fact is that our dependence on oil from nations in the Middle East and other regions constrains our choices, hamstringing America's flexibility and choices on the world stage. Too often, we are forced to consider the impact our foreign policy will have on our oil supply instead of whether a choice is in line with our values. Every day, we make a clear choice between living up to those values (and strengthening our security) and prolonging our weakness as a dirty-energy nation. Today, thousands of Americans are calling for a new freedom from oil — a dangerous, dirty and vulnerable source of energy. This week, 10,000 American flags were planted on the National Mall, each representing Americans who have pledged to free our nation from a long and damaging cycle of dependence. As Americans look to rebuild our economy, we must consider the massive, alarming and unprecedented transfer of wealth to those who do not share our values. America's ability to underwrite our national security always had, at its heart, the pumping arteries of a vibrant economy. Unless we act soon, we will be held hostage to the rest of the world, not just for oil, but for the clean-energy technology that will power the next century of growth and prosperity. Already dependent on oil, our country needs to act now lest we become dependent on China for solar panels. A more insidious impact of our dependence is clear in America's foreign and military policy. Today we are forced to both pay and protect the nations that supply our oil, the very nations that fuel extremism around the world and turn a blind eye to terrorist funding within their own borders. That money, winding its way through shady front groups and so-called charities, ends up funding not just insurgents in Iraq, but also in Afghanistan and Pakistan. The tragedy in the Gulf of Mexico demonstrates, in clear and often painful terms, just how unreliable our energy sources have become. We are forced to drill to the deepest depths of the ocean, to despoil the richness of our God-given natural treasures, and to rely on dangerously uncontrollable technologies. It is time for us to stand on our own — to take control of our energy — with sources that will not threaten our security, fund our enemies or force us to ignore our values. The long struggle to live up to the challenge of our values has always been difficult, but today we stand at a clear crossroads between moving beyond oil or prolonging our dependence on it. Clean, American power is possible, but only if we commit ourselves to achieving that goal. In the spirit of the holiday and in light of the tragedy in the Gulf, let us dedicate the next two decades to winning a new battle for American independence — from oil. . The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of Jonathan Powers. added by: EthicalVegan

Pseudo-Journalist/Anti-Blackwater Jihadist Jeremy Scahill’s Anti-Americanism: ‘I Hate When People Chant U-S-A’

You would think that if there were one thing people could agree on, despite their politics, it would be cheering for the United States in a sporting event. But no, not for Jeremy Scahill. Scahill, a regular contributor for left-wing The Nation magazine , has dedicated the past several years of his life to an obsession over the defense contractor Xe Services LLC, formerly known as Blackwater. But apparently Scahill can’t overcome his politics and take pride in his country’s World Cup soccer team. In a series of posts on his Twitter account , Scahill vented his frustrations over cheering for the United States in the World Cup: I hate when people chant U-S-A. #FalseNationalistCrap If a night raid in Afghanistan was televised, would these drunk asses chant U-S-A, U-S-A when civilians are killed? I like the US players, I just think it’s gross to chant U-S-A when we are killing people daily #worldcup Obviously Scahill has a problem differentiating U.S. foreign policy from U.S. athletics, but it could make you question his motives in general as an esteemed member of the liberal media.

See the original post:
Pseudo-Journalist/Anti-Blackwater Jihadist Jeremy Scahill’s Anti-Americanism: ‘I Hate When People Chant U-S-A’

Jon Stewart: Media ‘Kind of Suck’ for Getting Scooped by Rolling Stone

Comedian Jon Stewart Wednesday pointed out an inconvenient truth about this week’s General Stanley McChrystal incident: the media “kind of suck” for getting scooped by Rolling Stone magazine. As “The Daily Show” host addressed the day’s events involving the General and President Obama, he showed clips of various press members expressing disgust that Rolling Stone would get such access to McChrystal and staff. These included CNN’s Wolf Blitzer and Anderson Cooper as well as MSNBC’s Chris Matthews. After the final clip of CNN Pentagon correspondent Barbara Starr asking, “What on earth was he thinking giving an interview to Rolling Stone,” Stewart quipped, “At approximately 11:04 Eastern Standard Time, the American news media finally realized they kind of suck” (video follows with more highlights and commentary): Stewart next showed some real investigative reporting at CNN: Rick Sanchez talking about his kids having a party in his basement. The Comedy Central star derided, “I’m not sure the unfiltered, over the top musings of the Commanding General undermining the now nine year mission in Afghanistan is quite analogous to your kids hanging out in the basement lighting farts.” No, but it does tell us the state of today’s television news media. As NewsBusters has been reporting since its inception, there isn’t a lot of real investigative journalism going on in our nation anymore, especially if it could be harmful to Democrats. Traditional media were totally scooped by the National Enquirer concerning former Sen. John Edwards’ affair. Just this week news outlets were also bested by the Enquirer’s report concerning former Vice President Al Gore making unwanted sexual advances on a masseuse in 2006. As it pertains to Obama, NewsBusters has chronicled for years stories the mainstream media ignored during the campaign and since his inauguration that would have been embarrassing as well as politically damaging to him and his administration. As such, it shouldn’t be at all surprising to anyone that a news outlet outside the mainstream logged this report concerning McChrystal, as most Americans have known for quite some time the media “kind of suck.” 

Read more here:
Jon Stewart: Media ‘Kind of Suck’ for Getting Scooped by Rolling Stone

Media Praise Obama’s ‘Brilliant’ Decision to Fire Gen. McChrystal

President Obama’s decision to relieve General Stanley McChrystal of command in Afghanistan and replace him with General David Petraeus was met with a chorus of praise in the media, as anchors and pundits on CBS, NBC, MSNBC, and CNN all sang in unison that it was a “brilliant” move.   During live special coverage leading up to the announcement in the 1PM ET hour on CBS, White House correspondent Chip Reid proclaimed: “it sounds like a pretty brilliant decision really.” At the same time on NBC, correspondent Jim Miklaszewski described it as a “stunning development” and added “at a quick glance, almost brilliant .” Minutes later, White House correspondent Chuck Todd declared: “politically, in this town, it’s going to be seen as a brilliant choice by the President.” Over on CNN, moments after Obama finished speaking, anchor Wolf Blitzer remarked that it was a “major moment for this president” and later observed: “a very brilliant move to tap General Petraeus.” Finally, in the 2PM ET hour on MSNBC, Meet the Press host David Gregory concluded: “I think he took swift and decisive action. I think that’s how it’s going to be read.” In addition to cheering Obama’s brilliance, another common theme in the media reaction was to assert the President’s decision would be immune from criticism. Reid explained: “So the President avoids both the criticisms here, number one, putting somebody new in charge and, number two, since he fired McChrystal, he’s not going to be accused of being weak.”  Miklaszewski noted: “this may quiet some of the critics up on Capitol Hill.” Todd later added: “…you will not hear a single word from Capitol Hill, no Republican will dare say a negative thing about this decision.”

Read more:
Media Praise Obama’s ‘Brilliant’ Decision to Fire Gen. McChrystal

Video: Arab Media Gives Platform to Woman Who Warns Israeli Women to Leave or Be Raped

As debate has been raging over Israel and the Middle East it is important that we understand how Israel is treated in the region. Here is a video of an Egyptian woman being given a platform on Arab television to threaten that Israeli women should “leave the land” or be “raped.” (Content warning): Make sure you visit this post at the Eyeblast blog for more details on and discussion of the video.

See more here:
Video: Arab Media Gives Platform to Woman Who Warns Israeli Women to Leave or Be Raped

Government hacker betrays Wikileaks video source

Pictured: Hacker Adrian Lamo (Credit: Matthew Griffiths) http://news.cnet.com/8301-27080_3-20007024-245.html?tag=TOCmoreStories.0 A well-known hacker says he tipped authorities off to a man who confided in him about leaking a video of a U.S. military helicopter gunning down journalists and civilians in Iraq in 2007. Other information allegedly being leaked could compromise U.S. foreign policy and lead to deaths, the hacker said. “I turned him in to protect lives and to protect information that's essential for the U.S. to be able to effectively carry out foreign policy abroad,” Adrian Lamo, once busted for breaking into computer networks of high-profile companies, told CNET in a phone interview on Monday. “He was not at all being mindful about what he was leaking. He was basically acting as a vacuum cleaner.” U.S. Army intelligence analyst Bradley Manning was arrested nearly two weeks ago from a military base near Baghdad after Lamo shared e-mails and instant-message conversations he had had with Manning. Manning, 22, of Potomac, Md., deployed with the 2nd Brigade 10th Mountain Division in Baghdad, was placed in pretrial confinement for allegedly releasing classified information. He is currently confined in Kuwait, the Pentagon said in a statement Monday. In addition to the airstrike shooting video, Manning told Lamo he had leaked video footage showing a 2009 air strike in Afghanistan that killed nearly 200 civilians, including many children; a classified Army document assessing Wikileaks as a security threat; and 260,000 classified U.S. diplomatic cables showing what Manning said were “almost criminal political back dealings,” according to Wired. “If it was just the video, I would have left the issue alone, and frankly, he would have had my kudos–and he still does,” Lamo said. “But it wasn't just the video. It was a lot of information that was unrelated to our activities in Iraq and Afghanistan or the war on terror at all, including information about some of our major trading partners.” Asked to elaborate, Lamo said he couldn't say more, except that the sensitive information had to do with code words and that it was “top-secret sensitive, compartmentalized information.” The Iraq helicopter video, released on Wikileaks in April under the title “Collateral Murder,” generated an outpouring of antimilitary sentiment because the shootings appeared to be unjustified and because of the apparent lack of compassion displayed by the unidentified soldiers involved. The video showed the Apache helicopter shooting at a group of people on the street and a van that pulled up to rescue the injured, wounding several children and killing two Reuters journalists and other unarmed Iraqi civilians. “Look at those dead bastards,” one pilot is heard saying. “Nice,” someone else replies. Laughter is heard, as a tank on the ground appears to drive over a dead body. A perfect storm Lamo, previously dubbed the “homeless hacker,” knows what it's like to be on the wrong side of the law. Sleeping in bus terminals and abandoned buildings, Lamo would use public Internet connections to break into corporate networks and Web sites. He answered customer support e-mails at Excite@Home, told WorldCom how to fix its security to prevent intrusions like his, modified news articles on Yahoo, and used Lexis-Nexis to search for owners of undercover police cars. While some companies thanked Lamo for pointing out their lax security, others complained, and an arrest warrant was issued in 2003. Lamo spent a few days in hiding before turning himself in and pleading guilty to unauthorized network access at The New York Times, Lexis-Nexis, and Microsoft. He was sentenced to six months of home arrest and 24 months probation, and ordered to pay about $60,000 in fines. After that, he studied journalism and has been working as a threat analyst. “I've been 22. I've been in shackles and led by guards before a judge to determine my fate. I've been where he is,” Lamo said of Manning. “I know it can be terrifying, and I wish to God it hadn't been me that had to do it.” Lamo said he thinks Manning contacted him after reading a Wired article last month about Lamo being diagnosed with Asperger's syndrome, after a stint in the hospital for depression. “He was lonely and wanted somebody to reach out to,” Lamo said. “It's the most painful part of it–the fact that he had such a simple and pure intent, and it had to be me.” It's unclear exactly what Manning's motivation was in the alleged whistle-blowing, but a glimpse can be seen in one of his messages to Lamo: “If you had unprecedented access to classified networks 14 hours a day, 7 days a week, for 8-plus months, what would you do?” Even though Manning was required to use secured laptops to access the classified networks the information was on–SIPRNET, the Secret Internet Protocol Router Network, used by the Defense Department and the State Department to transfer classified data, and the Joint Worldwide Intelligence Communications System–and they were not connected to the Internet, it was still relatively easy for him to smuggle the information out, he told Lamo. For example, Manning would bring a rewritable CD to work labeled as music, erase the music, and store classified data on it by compressing it and splitting it into smaller files. I “listened and lip-synced to Lady Gaga's 'Telephone' while exfiltrating possibly the largest data spillage in American history,” he told Lamo. “Weak servers, weak logging, weak physical security, weak counterintelligence, inattentive signal analysis…a perfect storm.” Like many others, Lamo applauded the release of the 2007 video showing the helicopter attack in Iraq. But releasing all the diplomatic cables was going too far, he said. “My plan initially was not to see him arrested. I and the FBI wanted to continue feeding him disinformation,” Lamo said. However, the criminal investigation unit of the Army had other plans, he said. A compassionate man, Lamo sounds burdened by the weight of his actions. He's been called a “snitch” and received lots of hate mail for turning in someone whom many people, including Wikileaks founder Julian Assange–call a hero. Lamo has even received death threats. He knew he would feel the heat but felt that the only honorable thing to do was to go public with the story, because Manning “has a right to know who flipped him.” “I agonized over this. I regret the whole situation,” Lamo said. “I wish he had never told me anything beyond the gun camera footage, but ultimately, I didn't get Bradley Manning arrested. Bradley Manning got Bradley Manning arrested.” added by: Elevator

Palins Pay Day, Flotilla Folly and Priest-Love, all in One

Why shooting peace activists to death is a big deal even in foreign policy circles, what priests mistresses think of celibacy and how much public money Sarah Palin got paid to attempt public speech.

Link:
Palins Pay Day, Flotilla Folly and Priest-Love, all in One

Vampire Weekend ‘Holiday’ Video Premieres Today On MTV/MTV2!

Low-budget clip for Contra single shows band dressed in powdered wigs, stockings and ordering burgers. By James Montgomery Vampire Weekend’s “Holiday” Vampire Weekend ‘s “Holiday” is a rather cutting assessment of capitalism and colonialism and the special sort of cocoon both those things help create. With lyrical nods to republics on the beach, the tea trade and a girl who decides to protest the war by going vegetarian (as opposed to, you know, doing anything that may actually help), it’s the kind of whip-smart pop that’s in short supply these days — a cranky and clever tweaking of hideous Americans abroad, and equally hideous Americans at home. Needless to say, “Holiday” probably won’t be burning up the nation’s airwaves anytime soon, but that hasn’t stopped VW from releasing it as the third single off their surprisingly successful Contra album. And you can sort of understand why. After scoring a #1 album and a pair of unlikely rock-radio hits, they’re playing with house money at this point anyway. To accompany their odd choice of single, the band has delivered an equally odd video, a delightfully low-budget clip ( no Jake Gyllenhaal here) that sees the Vampire guys parading around Southern California dressed as dandy, European gentlemen of leisure. Powdered wigs, waistcoats, breeches, stockings and a whole lot of ruffled accoutrements — it’s all there. And while it may be hilarious to watch them prance around SoCal, order In-N-Out Burger (at least, I think it’s In-N-Out Burger) and pound on surfers down by the beach, there’s probably a deeper message here: These are exactly the same kind of out-of-touch, entitled intellectuals frontman Ezra Koenig is singing about in the song — only from about 300 years ago. These powdered ponces conquered, enslaved and trampled those less fortunate than them, and did so for centuries, before they were eventually overthrown (and mostly beheaded) by the same folks they’d been subjugating. I’ll let you draw the comparisons to, say, the last 50 years of U.S. foreign policy or the creeping advance of capitalism on the undeveloped world … and what may very well be waiting around the corner for us one day if we keep it up. Or, you know, you could just laugh at the dudes in the funny wigs. It kind of works either way. And that’s sort of the brilliance of Vampire Weekend. “Holiday” might not be the same kind of hit as “Cousins” or “Giving Up the Gun,” but that’s hardly the point. Just by getting this one out there, they’ve already won, even if it’s just a tiny victory. Don’t let the boat shoes and pique polo shits fool you — Vampire Weekend are downright dangerous dudes. That you can dance to, of course. Do you think “Holiday” will be another Vampire Weekend hit? Let us know in the comments Related Artists Vampire Weekend

Read the rest here:
Vampire Weekend ‘Holiday’ Video Premieres Today On MTV/MTV2!

US to Fund Israel ‘Iron Dome’ Project

American lawmakers have overwhelmingly backed a proposal to provide Israel with $205m (

DSM-V – Psychiatry Enters Dangerous Territory – Inventing Disorders Again

Written by Bruce Walker Thursday, 20 May 2010 15:40 The new fourth revision of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) published by the American Psychiatric Association may define several new psychiatric disorders. Some of these do not sound like varieties of mental illness at all, but rather opinions and attitudes. What would “oppositional defiant disorder,” for example, represent? According to the new edition of the Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, this would include those who have “negativistic, defiant, disobedient and hostile behavior toward authority figures.” Other varieties of newly created mental illnesses included being antisocial, arrogant, or cynical. Those familiar with psychiatry in the Soviet Union will cringe at this sort of neo-psychiatry. Authority, for example, may often be wrong in a society. The right to contend with authority has long been considered a primary right of a free people. Soviet psychiatrists, however, institutionalized and “treated” those who defied Soviet authority, which was considered, per se, a variety of mental illness. Cynicism is often the most sensible attitude of those who find government and politics to be a cesspool of corruption. The presumption that society and government are functioning properly, which is implicit in these new psychiatric “disorders,” looks very Orwellian. Only the dullest mind, or the most sheepish people, can look at our tax code, our school system, our immigration policies, and our foreign policy and see only goodness and wisdom. Psychiatric opinions can have a dramatic impact upon court rulings. Laws are often built around those opinions: the right to bear arms, for example, is denied to those who have a history of mental illness. What if that mental illness is defined as a profound distrust of government in America? Then government would have the right to disarm those who saw something very wrong in our political system. Many parents already worry about the over-medication of children, who may well be the first group diagnosed under these new standards. Eccentric children have often been the greatest men in history. Mozart, for example, was hyperactive (by today’s standards) and approached music differently than conventional composers did. Did he have a mental illness? Or was he rather, as the Pope who knew him said, “Amadeus” — Beloved of God? How about Capablanca, the greatest child chess prodigy in history? Was he mentally ill? Both of those men led relatively conventional lives, but what about men like Newton and Beethoven, who were considered to be misanthropic. Was this mental illness, which must be treated with therapy and drugs? Or was it, rather, the expected response of geniuses living among men of much weaker minds? Treating such unique men with drugs and therapy might deprive mankind of its greatest innovators and analysts. The politics of collectivism permeates every aspect of modern life. Individuality, uniqueness, privacy, and separation are inherent rights of free men. These are also anathema to collectivism, which views us all as interchangeable parts of a vast, impersonal, statist machine. Psychiatry which does not account for the particular nature of each of us is not medicine and it is not science: it is simply collectivism lathered on something called medical science. http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/usnews/health-care/3586-psychiatry-enter… added by: PepsiJuror