Tag Archives: gyllenhaal

‘Love And Other Drugs’ Stars Say The Story ‘Trumps’ The Nudity

‘I think us taking off our clothes in the movie is the result of us knowing that we cared about the story,’ Jake Gyllenhaal tells MTV News. By Kara Warner, with reporting by Josh Horowitz Anne Hathaway and Jake Gyllenhaal Photo: MTV News Jake Gyllenhaal and Anne Hathaway may claim that there isn’t that much nudity in their new romance/drama “Love and Other Drugs,” in which Gyllenhaal plays playboy Viagra sales rep Jamie who falls for Hathaway’s free-spirited Maggie, but given the publicity surrounding it — as well as their scantily clad Entertainment Weekly covers this week — we think there’s more to the story. When MTV News caught up with the playful co-stars, we asked them if they realized how much they would eventually have to talk about getting nekkid. “I really didn’t,” Gyllenhaal insisted. “I really, honestly did not think about that at all.” “I didn’t either,” Hathaway added. “Because when you make a film, you don’t know what the film is going to be or how much of what you shot is going to be in it, and so to anticipate a reaction is kind of fruitless.” “Plus, maybe I’m a little naive in thinking that the story trumps all the little naked presence,” Gyllenhaal offered. “There’s not that much nudity,” Hathaway insisted. “I saw the film the other night, and we’d been talking to journalists for a couple weeks at that point, and when I saw it, I’m like, ‘Why is everyone going on about this?’ It’s really such a small part of the film,” she said. “It’s almost like the media is conditioned to think of this as being a very big deal. I don’t think it’s a big deal, so I didn’t anticipate anyone else doing so.” Gyllenhaal did admit that he and Hathaway strip down throughout the film, but that it really shouldn’t be the focal point. “We are naked a lot, that is for sure. I don’t want to play it down either,” he said. “We are naked a lot more than you normally see in movies, but I think us taking off our clothes in the movie is the result of us knowing that we cared about the story and the story is important to us. The talk about being naked or having clothes off or how racy the scenes are, no matter how much we talk about it, we know what we’ve done we’re really proud of.” “I just do it for the money,” Hathaway joked. “I don’t care about the story.” Check out everything we’ve got on “Love and Other Drugs.” For breaking news, celebrity columns, humor and more — updated around the clock — visit MTVMoviesBlog.com . Related Videos MTV Rough Cut: ‘Love & Other Drugs’

More here:
‘Love And Other Drugs’ Stars Say The Story ‘Trumps’ The Nudity

Jake Gyllenhaal and Anne Hathaway EW photos

“It#39;s s-exy when we’re doing it,” Gyllenhaal tells EW about flirting with Hathaway onscreen. “And then it stops. But she could probably talk to a wall and have chemistry.” “I didn#39;t want to make a big deal about nerves,” Hathaway says of getting comfortably na-ked in the film, in theaters Nov. 24. “Of course, there is that revoltingly embarrassing moment when you have to take your clothes off in front of strangers. I mean, I don#39;t go to the beach in a bikini for a reason.” “There’s,

See the original post:
Jake Gyllenhaal and Anne Hathaway EW photos

Jake Gyllenhaal And Anne Hathaway EW magazine

“There’s, like, this little door that you open up and you#39;re like, #39;You down?#39; ” Jake Gyllenhaal tells EW of letting chemistry (and a little nudity) take over as he filmed intimate scenes with Anne Hathaway for Love Other Drugs. The two got so comfortable with each other, they#39;ve now bared their bods for this week#39;s three Entertainment Weekly covers, on newsstands now. You might think Jake Gyllenhaal and Anne Hathaway shooting three different nu-de covers for Entertainment Week

Read more:
Jake Gyllenhaal And Anne Hathaway EW magazine

Buzz Break: Jake Gyllenhaal Surprised and Naked in Love and Other Drugs

Gemma Arterton Marries Her Real-Life Prince

Gemma Arterton’s new hubby may not have Jake Gyllenhaal’s rock-hard abs, but he was the one with the rock. The Prince of Persia star swapped vows Sunday with Italian love Stefano…

Go here to read the rest:
Gemma Arterton Marries Her Real-Life Prince

Maggie Gyllenhaal is so ugly

Maggie Gyllenhaal arrives at the Metropolitan Museum of Art Costume Institute gala, Monday, May 3, 2010 in New York. Maggie Gyllenhaal#39;s next venture will be a family affair – she#39;s teaming up with husband PETER SARSGAARD for a new play. The couple, who wed last year (09) and share a three-year-old daughter, first starred together in a 2009 production of Uncle Vanya. And the working collaboration was such a success, the pair is doing it again. They#39;ve signed up to star in another An

Read more from the original source:
Maggie Gyllenhaal is so ugly

Who Should Play the Younger Sex and the City Girls?

The Sex and the City girls have been clobbering boobs to abs against Jake Gyllenhaal at the box office this weekend, and if you’re still undecided about which to splurge on, let us save you…

See the original post:
Who Should Play the Younger Sex and the City Girls?

Carrie Bradshaw vs. Datsan: Who’d You Rather?

Filed under: Sarah Jessica Parker , Jake Gyllenhaal , Beauty With ” Sex and the City 2 ” and ” Prince of Persia ” both opening this weekend, Sarah Jessica “Carrie Bradshaw” Parker and Jake “Datsan”Gyllenhaal are involved in an epic battle at the box office. Question is … Read more

Read the original post:
Carrie Bradshaw vs. Datsan: Who’d You Rather?

‘Prince Of Persia: The Sands Of Time’: Boys Town, By Kurt Loder

Jake Gyllenhaal, swashbuckler Jake Gyllenhaal Photo: MTV News Okay, Jake Gyllenhaal’s sudden, suntanned muscularity suggests Malibu Beach more than it does ancient Persia; and one wonders if ancient Persians said things like “Watch your back” and “I need a drink.” Still, “Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time” seems (I’m guessing) like a pretty great Arabian-adventure movie for kids. It’s made in the classic Disney style: no sex, no swearing, and lots of action with very little blood. So if you know a kid — of the male persuasion, ideally — you might want to take him to see it. You might also want to wait at a bar while he does so. The movie is based on a long-evolving video game created by Jordan Mechner, who came up with the story for the film, too. It’s the sort of story whose hazy details could only be ignored by a kid waiting impatiently for the next eruption of swordplay, rope-swinging and bad-guy noggin-conking. Gyllenhaal plays Dastan, a commoner who was adopted as an urchin, for reasons we can hurry right past here, by the good King Sharaman (Ronald Pickup), who raised the boy along with his two sons, Garsiv (Toby Kebbell) and Tus (Richard Coyle). Also lurking about is the lads’ uncle, Nizam (Ben Kingsley, wearing enough eye shadow to put him in danger of drawing harem duty). As the tale gets underway, Nizam brings news that the holy city of Alamut (the names in this picture might have been concocted from random grabs of Scrabble tiles) is supplying weapons to Persia’s enemies. The now-grown Dastan is heroically helpful in storming Alamut’s battlements, and once inside draws the attention of the resident Princess Tamina (Gemma Arterton). After some preliminary squabbling (the traditional prelude to a chaste Disney kiss), she eventually informs him that Alamut is the repository of “the beating heart of all life — the sandglass of the gods.” You’d never guess it from the outside. The sandglass turns out to be located in the handle of a golden dagger, of which Dastan, for some typically hazy reason, is in possession. Pressing a button on this magical artifact summons a fiery wind that allows the dagger’s wielder to go back one minute in time and undo whatever terrible things may need to be undone. Such a thing soon ensues: King Sharaman dons a robe that someone has given him as a gift and … it kills him. (The haze thickens.) Dastan is quickly fingered as the malefactor and must flee into the desert with Tamina. Out among the dunes they encounter a character named Sheik Amar (Alfred Molina), who presides over a desert settlement where he stages ostrich races “every Tuesday and Thursday.” (As you always suspected of ostrich races, they’re fixed.) When the duplicitous Amar learns that there’s a reward out for Dastan’s capture, the prince and his princess are forced to flee again, this time under cover of an ostrich stampede, which I must say is something to see. Dastan now rashly decides that the time is right to return home to attend the funeral of his father, and to try to determine who is responsible for his death. (Men with an overabundance of eye shadow are of course always prime suspects.) Various trials must be endured along the way — a trudge through the Valley of the Slaves, an onslaught of black-clad, whip-flicking Hassassins (the hashish-stoked killers of legend, but here — this being a Disney film — apparently drug-free). In the end, Dastan and Tamina make it back to his native castle and … so forth and so on. Producer Jerry Bruckheimer really knows his way around this sort of great big money-stuffed movie, and here he delivers everything you might expect. The action is excitingly staged (some of the wild roof-leaping suggests that the urban acrobatics of parkour were devised far earlier than we’d thought), although the CGI varies from beautiful (the hilltop city of Alamut) to whatever (that fiery wind). There are some funny touches, too — Molina in particular seems to be having a ball. Most amusing, though, is the fact that, in the grand tradition of Hollywood movies about long-ago foreigners, all the main parts are played by Brits — except for that of Gyllenhaal, of course, who nevertheless affects a British accent in solidarity with his fellow Persians. Despite his tanned buffness, however, Gyllenhaal is a little too laid-back for serious swashbuckling; and Arterton, a good actress in other pictures, here falls back on her basic gorgeousness, occasionally inflected with a curious lip twitch that she really ought to have looked at. But then if you feel that acting quality is a serious concern, you’re not the target audience for this hard-charging fantasy epic. Fortunately, the bar’s right down the street. Check out everything we’ve got on “Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time.” For breaking news, celebrity columns, humor and more — updated around the clock — visit MTVMoviesBlog.com . Related Videos MTV Rough Cut: ‘Prince Of Persia: The Sands Of Time’ ‘Prince Of Persia: Sands Of Time’ Clips Related Photos ‘Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time’ Red Carpet ‘Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time’ Official Stills

See the original post:
‘Prince Of Persia: The Sands Of Time’: Boys Town, By Kurt Loder

REVIEW: Gyllenhaal, Prince of Persia Delivers Throwback Movie Thrills

Prince of Persia is a maybe-not-so-accurate historical epic based on a video game — and that’s the reason to see it, not stay away from it. By now everyone has seen the pictures of an impossibly buff and buffed Jake Gyllenhaal — his skin looks as if it’s been polished with centuries’ worth of walnut oil — as an ancient Persian warrior. We’ve all laughed derisively at his brooding stare and anachronistic rock-star tresses. But Gyllenhaal gets the last laugh in Prince of Persia : He’s having a great time, he knows he looks awesome and he gets to ride horses. Plus, in the end his character gets the girl, a stunner of a princess named Tomina (though I immediately forgot her name and could henceforth think of her only as Princess Hummina Hummina). If you think you’re above Prince of Persia — and until I saw it, I certainly did — then it’s time to come off your not-so-high horse.

Read the original here:
REVIEW: Gyllenhaal, Prince of Persia Delivers Throwback Movie Thrills