Tag Archives: harry-reid

CMI’s Burchfiel Talks Media Double Standards on Fox & Friends

Culture and Media Institute Assistant Editor Nathan Burchfiel joined “Fox & Friends” co-host Steve Doocy on Aug. 13 to discuss media coverage of Harry Reid and the media double standard on controversial statements made by liberals versus conservatives. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., told supporters on Aug. 10 that he couldn’t understand why “anyone with Hispanic heritage could be a Republican.” “If you watch the national media, there’s no outrage,” Burchfiel said when asked where the uproar over Reid’s comments had come from. “There’s certainly a lot of confusion, I think, among Hispanic conservatives as to the reasoning behind Harry Reid’s comments. It’s clear that he is not reading the same polls that other people are reading about the way that Hispanics feel about the current administration, the way that the feel about the economy and jobs, and even the way they feel about immigration.” Burchfiel suggested that Reid “maybe ask Brian Sandoval why a Hispanic might affiliate himself with the GOP or with conservative ideology.” Sandoval, who is Hispanic, is the GOP’s nominee for Nevada governor. He is leading his Democratic opponent, Reid’s son, Rory, by 19 points in the latest Las Vegas Review-Journal poll . The English-language media often turn to Univision anchor Jorge Ramos as an expert on Latino opinion. Ramos, as the Culture and Media Institute reported, is an active supporter of open borders and amnesty for illegal immigrants. However, a recent AP-Univision poll of Hispanic Americans found that only 9 percent rated immigration as the most important issue facing the United States. Most rated the economy or jobs as most important, and only 43 percent said they felt the current administration was doing a good job of addressing the Hispanic community’s needs. Doocy and Burchfiel also discussed the double standard in media coverage of controversial statements made by liberals versus conservatives in light of the comments made by two New Hampshire Democrats this week about the plane crash that killed former Sen. Ted Stevens. Keith Halloran, a candidate for the state legislature, wrote on Facebook that he wished Sarah Palin had been on the plane that crashed. State Rep. Timothy Horrigan resigned his office after he wrote on Facebook that a dead Sarah Palin would be more dangerous than a living Sarah Palin. The national networks ignored the story. “I mean you get a random guy at a Tea Party rally saying something remotely controversial and the media have his name, his address, his tax records, his elementary school report card, anything they can find that’s going to help them discredit him,” Burchfiel said. “But when you have liberals who are in office or running for office who literally say that they wish Sarah Palin were dead, there’s media silence on it.” “It’s unfortunately par for the course,” he added, “but it’s part of the way that the media have covered Sarah Palin since the very beginning, since she was announced as John McCain’s running mate.” A Culture and Media Institute study of coverage of Palin late in the 2008 campaign found the national media had two portraits of the then-vice presidential nominee. Palin was either portrayed as a Dunce by highlighting her quirks or replaying “Saturday Night Live” impersonations of her, or as a Demon – McCain’s attack dog or poison for conservatives.

See the article here:
CMI’s Burchfiel Talks Media Double Standards on Fox & Friends

CNN’s Sanchez: Reid’s Racist Gaffe Emblematic of Angle’s Incompetence

Discussing Harry Reid’s racially-charged comment about Hispanic Republicans, Rick Sanchez miraculously managed to turn the embattled senator’s gaffe into an example of his opponent Sharron Angle’s incompetence. On the prime time “Rick’s List” yesterday, the CNN host actually gave serious consideration to the Nevada Democrat’s claim while exploring the extent to which the Angle campaign is “blacking out” Hispanic media outlets. “Also, do you think a Hispanic-American can be a Republican?” teased Sanchez. “Harry Reid doesn’t think so. And I’m going to tell you what Hispanic groups are saying about his opponent as well.” Instead of interviewing a Hispanic Republican who is offended by Reid’s insensitive remarks, Sanchez brought on Miguel Barrientos, a liberal talk show host, to “drill down” on why Angle is allegedly ignoring Hispanic journalists. “These charges against Angle, are they real?” asked a bewildered Sanchez. “Is she really blocking out the Latin media? Or is this just a case of opportunism by her opponent, Harry Reid?” After Barrientos confirmed that Angle apparently does not feel the need to reach out to media personalities who describe themselves as “activists” who “get involved very heavily in the political area,” Sanchez wondered if the Republican Senate nominee is merely an incompetent campaigner: Well, look, maybe she’s just not good at this. Maybe she’s hired people who aren’t very savvy at reaching out to the media. Maybe they’re not very organized and they don’t return phone calls. You know, there’s a stretch between someone not being competent at dealing with the media and somebody blocking out a specific part of the media, simply because they don’t like them, because they’re Hispanic or black or Asian or whatever the accusation is. Reid drew fire when he claimed he doesn’t “know how anyone of Hispanic heritage could be a Republican.” Rather than criticize Reid for insulting the intelligence of every Hispanic Republican in America, Sanchez characterized the Senate majority leader’s statement as something that “some, possibly even what many, Americans think.” A transcript of the relevant segment can be found below: CNN Rick’s List August 11, 2010 Also, do you think a Hispanic-American can be a Republican? Harry Reid doesn’t think so. And I’m going to tell you what Hispanic groups are saying about his opponent as well. This is a hot political story, and I’m going to take you through it when we come back. This is RICK’S LIST. I’m glad that you’re here. RICK SANCHEZ: I am so excited about that. Can’t wait to share it with you. Welcome back. I’m Rick Sanchez. It may be what some, possibly even what many, Americans think. But should it be said by the Senate Majority Leader? What am I talking about? Should Harry Reid suggest that no self-respecting Hispanic-American can be or should be a Republican? Play it, Kel. Sen. HARRY REID (D-NV): I don’t know how anyone of Hispanic heritage could be a Republican, OK? Do I need to say more? SANCHEZ: No, you don’t need to say more. Now, as a South Floridian, I can tell you, senator, that there are many Hispanic Republicans. The question is whether Senator Reid is taking advantage of his opponent’s problems with Hispanics in Nevada. A problem that seems to have come to a head lately with the Latino reporters saying that Sharron Angle is blacking out the Latin media, blacking them out. They say they’re not invited to her press events, that they’re not set press releases, and their phone calls aren’t even being returned. Those are the accusations. Those are the charges. Now we asked both camps about this. Here’s what I got from Reid’s camp. Right? He sent me this tweet saying, look, Rick, “Angle’s anti-saving jobs, helping unemployed, social security, Medicare, and says immigration reform overriding our culture.” So he takes a shot at her. Well, here’s what Angle tweets, alright. “Harry Reid pulls out race card again, whacks himself in the head.” So you could see that they’re going at each other here. Now we asked Angle to join us tonight but she declined. I’ll read you her comment nonetheless. “We have brought on more communication staff,” she says, “in recent days, and we will be reaching out to all media outlets aggressively between now and Election Day.” “This attack,” she says, “is an attempt by Harry Reid to distract the voters from his record and his insensitive comments yesterday regarding Hispanic voters.” So here we go, tit-for-tat, right? Joining me now to wade through all this is Miguel Barrientos. He’s a community activist and radio host for KLAV-AM out in Las Vegas. Thank you for giving me the opportunity to roll the R’s while on American television. That was kind of neat. All right. Let’s start with this. These charges against Angle, are they real? Is she really blocking out the Latin media? Or is this just a case of opportunism by her opponent, Harry Reid? MIGUEL BARRIENTOS, KLAV-AM talk show host: First of all, hello, Rick. We have been working in the community through our radio show. We’re activists. We get involved very heavily in the political area. And we have contacted Sharron Angle’s office saying we want to hear what’s going on, we want to know what the tea party feels about, you know, opening the door to the Latinos, especially when you’re talking about immigration issues. And we have not gotten any phone calls returned. We don’t get support from their staff to say, “this is what we feel.” We always hear what they say on the local print media, but doesn’t come forward and talk to our community to our media. SANCHEZ: Well, look, maybe she’s just not good at this. Maybe she’s hired people who aren’t very savvy at reaching out to the media. Maybe they’re not very organized and they don’t return phone calls. You know, there’s a stretch between someone not being competent at dealing with the media and somebody blocking out a specific part of the media, simply because they don’t like them, because they’re Hispanic or black or Asian or whatever the accusation is. Are you sure when you make this accusation that you’re saying, “look, she’s got a problem with Hispanics?” BARRIENTOS: Well, I’m not – I don’t think she dislikes Hispanics. When you have potentially 100,000 voters that are going to be coming out to vote in the elections and she’s not paying attention to the segment of the community, maybe you’re right. Maybe she doesn’t understand, maybe she’s incompetent, maybe she’s not interested in the Latino vote at this point. SANCHEZ: She says that she’s going to try and hire some people to reach out to you. What’s your reaction to that? BARRIENTOS: Well, I think now that you brought it to her attention, maybe she’s going to get a little smarter on how she’s going to run the campaign and get some Latinos out there to maybe speak on her behalf, which I think is a good idea. SANCHEZ: There’s a possibility that someone in her camp would feel like you’re not going to give her a straight shot anyway. In other words, that much of your coverage is going to be directed towards the Democrat because the voting record there in Nevada tends to be from Hispanics, more of a Democratic vote than a Republican vote. How would you answer that charge? BARRIENTOS: Well, we have issues on the table, Rick. We have issues such as immigration reform. You know, this is something that we have been fighting since 2003 here in Nevada. We’ve been working with the politicians. The Republican Party has basically ignored our call. They don’t support anything that has to do with immigration reform. The DREAM Act is a big issue that our community is faced with, and we need to open up the doors for higher education for those who qualify. I mean, it’s always negative, negative, negative, when it comes down to our issues. So how are we supposed to feel when they’re not really taking care? We’re part of the constituency in her district. SANCHEZ: We’ll leave it at that, then. We understand your point of view and we’ll continue to drill down on this topic. Miguel Barrientos, thanks so much, sir. BARRIENTOS: Thank you, Rick.

See more here:
CNN’s Sanchez: Reid’s Racist Gaffe Emblematic of Angle’s Incompetence

Better Late Than Never: Rachel Maddow Taken to Task From Unlikely Quarter – The Huffington Post

It’s not often I see something on The Huffington Post I look forward to reading. Here’s an exception. In a post ungrammatically titled “Why Has the New York Times and Rachel Maddow Misled Us?”, novelist and essayist Richard Greener on Thursday wrote a stinging rebuke of a Times’ June 8 editorial and Maddow’s coverage on her show the following day of the Supreme Court emergency order intervening in Arizona’s political matching funds law. The specifics of Greener’s criticism of the Times and Maddow can be found by following this link to his post. (A video clip of the Maddow segment in question can be found here ). Greener laid it on thick when it came to Maddow, initially describing her as “always intelligent, smart and savvy and usually 100 percent credible” before going after her assertions about the court’s action. He concluded that “only two explanations remain for Rachel’s bad behavior” — One is, she’s just another TV entertainer, another pretty face in a long-line of million-dollar talking heads. She shows up, gets her make-up on and she performs her ‘show’ for the camera. Unsaid, is that she hasn’t a clue what the program’s about and perhaps doesn’t care very much. After all, it’s show business and it’s her living we’re talking about. It’s only ‘acting’ isn’t it? Second is she read the order. She knows perfectly well what it says. But she had a reason to do what she did, the way she did it. I don’t want to believe the first possibility. Don’t ask me why. I don’t know Rachel Maddow and I never will. But I kinda like her. I think she’s cool. And, I admit it — I usually agree with her. But I really don’t want to believe the second because its (sic) so fundamentally dishonest, deceptive and downright creepy that it makes me a little queasy. Greener deserves credit, as does The Huffington Post, for publishing this, knowing full well that many if not most of the readers on the site are also inclined to agree with Maddow. Where I part company with Greener is in his description of Maddow as “usually 100% percent credible.” Leaving aside the many examples on NewsBusters that undermine this claim, one need not venture far from the Maddow segment that Greener criticizes to see further evidence of this. The day before Maddow’s take on the Supreme Court action, Maddow interviewed Las Vegas Sun columnist and cable-show host Jon Ralston. The interview ended with a minor but telling error on Maddow’s part when she thanked Ralston for coming on her show ( click here for audio) — MADDOW: Jon Ralston, columnist for the Las Vegas Sun, host of ‘Face to Face with Jon Ralston,’ and as a political dean of the press corps in Nevada you’ve got one of the best jobs in American politics. … Except that Ralston works in journalism, not politics. Unless the person saying this sees no distinction between the two. What followed from Maddow on Wednesday and Thursday, however, was egregious. On Wednesday’s show, the same one featuring the segment criticized by Greener, Maddow revisited her verbal jousting with John Birchers at last winter’s CPAC gathering in her attempt to tar GOP Senate nominee Sharron Angle with guilt by association ( audio here ) — MADDOW:  Seeing the John Birch Society back in the heart of the conservative movement has been sort of a trip. I mean, once they got over the impulse to try to pretend that they are not now and never were crazy about stuff like fluoride, they then got right back into the business of being super-paranoid, highly-imaginative conspiracy theorists about stuff like fluoride. These guys really believe if we’re going to get serious about stopping communist mind-control plots, we must oppose the dreaded Bolshevik fluoride in the water. Here’s the most amazing thing, though. The John Birch Society now, in that view, has a very highly placed champion, the Republican candidate for Senate in Nevada, Sharron Angle — fighter against fluoride! Really! In 1999 the Nevada state assembly passed a bill requiring the fluoridation of water in two Nevada counties. Then-assemblywoman Sharron Angle tried to block fluoridation in one of those counties. According to an account in the Las Vegas Review-Journal, ‘Angle said she simply does not like fluoride.’ A day later, Maddow embellished on the basis for Angle’s opposition to fluoridation ( audio here ) — MADDOW:  Now that Sharron Angle has won the Republican nomination for Senate to run against Harry Reid in Nevada, now the fun part. Now the fun part is watching the national Republican political establishment try to figure out what to do with Sharron Angle. Try to figure out how to balance that national Republican frothing, clamoring, heart-racing desire to beat Harry Reid with the fact that their candidate against Harry Reid thinks that fluoride in drinking water is a conspiracy and recently suggested that beer should be illegal. Sow’s ear, can you become a silk purse? Can you?! To recap: Maddow on Wednesday — Angle’s opposition to fluoridation, according to the newspaper Maddow cited quoting Angle, is personal distaste. Maddow on Thursday claims as “fact” that Angle believes fluoridation is a “conspiracy” — as in Bolshevik. Sharing Angle’s concern, by the way, is that scurrilous right-wing rag Scientific American, which ran an article titled “Second Thoughts on Fluoride” in 2008. Guess they’re in on the conspiracy too. Maddow is “usually 100% percent credible”? Hardly. More like, slippery as an oil slick.

View original post here:
Better Late Than Never: Rachel Maddow Taken to Task From Unlikely Quarter – The Huffington Post

Margaret Carlson: Only ‘Completely Masochistic’ Voters Would Elect ‘Almost Wacky’ Republican Sharron Angle

During the “Last Word” segment on Bloomberg Television’s Political Capital on Friday, Bloomberg News columnist Margaret Carlson – formerly of CNN and Time magazine – tore into Nevada Republican Senate nominee Sharron Angle – who will be taking on Harry Reid in November – as Carlson charged that Angle is “on the fringe, almost wacky,” and asserted that Nevada voters would have to be “completely masochistic” to vote for her. Carlson: You can’t beat somebody with somebody who’s as on the fringe, almost wacky, as Sharron Angle, unless the voters turn completely masochistic. She’s not just against (MEANT TO SAY “in favor of”) abolishing EPA, Energy, Education, phasing out Social Security, and getting rid of the income tax, she wants our nuclear waste to go to Nevada. Fellow panel member Kate O’Beirne of the National Review responded: “I’d hoped over the years I had built up Margaret’s tolerance for conservative women, but, sadly, that’s apparently not the case.” Below is a transcript of the relevant portion of the Friday, June 11, Political Capital on Bloomberg Television: MARGARET CARLSON: Harry Reid went to bed as happy as a man can be who’s in the crosshairs of the Republican party on Tuesday night because the least electable candidate won that race, Sharron Angle. You know, the old saying, “You can’t beat somebody with nobody,” you can’t be somebody with somebody who’s as on the fringe, almost wacky, as Sharron Angle, unless the voters turn completely masochistic. She’s not just against abolishing EPA, Energy, Education, phasing out Social Security, and getting rid of the income tax, she wants our nuclear waste to go to Nevada. You know, I’m happy to send it there, as most people who aren’t in Nevada are. AL HUNT: That’s very generous of you, Margaret. Let me ask Kate, do you agree Harry Reid now is looking a lot better? KATE O’BEIRNE: Al, I’d hoped over the years I had built up Margaret’s tolerance for conservative women, but, sadly, that’s apparently not the case.

View post:
Margaret Carlson: Only ‘Completely Masochistic’ Voters Would Elect ‘Almost Wacky’ Republican Sharron Angle

Big Corporations Lobby President, Congress For Climate Legislation

photo via flickr A group of 60 companies, together with environmental groups, delivered a letter to President Obama and Sens. Mitch McConnell and Harry Reid yesterday calling for action on the Senate climate bill. No one knows the fate of the Kerry-Lieberman bill, introduced earlier this month, but big names like the Big Three automakers, Honeywell, and Google are saying the time for action is now. … Read the full story on TreeHugger

Read more:
Big Corporations Lobby President, Congress For Climate Legislation

Indonesia sets record with 10,000 paper lanterns

More than 10,000 twinkling paper lanterns were released into the night sky from a beach in Indonesia, setting a world record, officials said on Monday. added by: poojam 3 comments

Follow this link:
Indonesia sets record with 10,000 paper lanterns

Public option likely to be removed from healthcare overhaul

Chances that a so-called “public option” — under which the government would set up competitors to private health insurers — appear to be dimming. With recent hard-edged comments by Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT), who avers that he will vote to filibuster any bill that contains a public-run health insurer, moderates have been meeting to hammer out a deal

Go here to see the original:
Public option likely to be removed from healthcare overhaul

Reid eyes tax hike on wealthy to pay for health bill

Senate majority leader Harry Reid (D-Nevada) is considering a payroll tax hike on the wealthy to help pay for health care reform. The House passed a similar provision in its legislation, increasing the taxes of those who make $500,000 or more a year.

See more here:
Reid eyes tax hike on wealthy to pay for health bill

What Is Joe Lieberman’s Plan, Exactly?

You have heard, probably, about how Connecticut Senator Joe “Wallace Wimple” Lieberman inserted himself into the health care debate by announcing that he’d join a Republican filibuster against Harry Reid’s bill.

Read more from the original source:
What Is Joe Lieberman’s Plan, Exactly?