The marriage between Ashley Martson and Jay Smith is over, right? After all, Ashley filed to divorce her cheating husband. But in Ashley's most recent Instagram photo, fans have spotted something interesting — and potentially alarming. She's wearing a conspicuous band around her left ring finger — a finger usually reserved for engagement rings and wedding bands. Has Ashley found someone new already? Or, worse, are she and Jay trying to make it work yet again? April wasn't the first time that she filed to divorce her cheating husband this year. Last time, she took him back. Is history repeating itself? Read our post below to find out what Ashley revealed: 1. Ashley Martson is taking time for herself She uploaded this new photo to Instagram, tagging it “#simplelife #lake #nature.” It’s great to see her relaxing after all that this year has put her through. 2. But … what’s this? We’ve zoomed in a little for you — as much as we could without sacrificing image quality. That’s definitely a ring on Ashley’s finger. On her ring finger of her left hand, no less. 3. WTF?!? Ashley has been spotted with a couple of very hot guys in the almost two months since she went public with the demise of her marriage to Jay. But she said that they were just photos, and that she wasn’t dating anyone seriously. 4. She had a lot of healing to do Ashley has lost months of her life trying to fix a marriage that was broken within days of the nuptials. 5. It’s not that she can’t find another man Ashley is hot, has an entertaining personality, and doesn’t seem to be short on cash, either. Of course she can find any man she likes. 6. But … Ashley needs time to heal and recover before she moves on from Jay. View Slideshow
Now that Jonathan Rivera has reportedly signed divorce papers, ex-wife Fernanda Flores says that he’s dead to her . Rumors about their marriage and breakup — including some wild, hurtful accusations — have circulated about this couple. Jonathan says that he is tired of hearing lies about himself, and wants to set the record straight. Jonathan Rivera has heard what fans and followers have been whispering about him, and enough is enough. “To set the record straight,” Jonathan’s comment begins. “I never cheated on her.” “I met my girlfirend months after our separation,” he shares. It was only in May that Jonathan revealed his girlfriend on social media as the two shared a sexy, romantic cruise. “I never ‘abused’ her,” Jonathan adds. “I never neglected her.” “I gave her everything I had,” Jonathan writes. “And,” he continues, he “treated her with nothing but respect.” “I was patient,” Jonathan insists. “But knew it had to end when she showed me who she really was.” Well, that is certainly ominous-sounding. It is also intensely and frustratingly vague coming from someone who signed up to be a public figure and has no known NDAs in effect. Jonathan makes it clear that he has heard enough rumors about how his marriage came to an end. “I will no longer be responding to these outrageous allegations,” Jonathan affirms. Once again, for those in the back, he repeats: “I have officially signed the divorce papers.” He means that Fernanda is now out of his life, forever. “I am happy,” Jonathan concludes. “And moving on with my life.” Jonathan and Fernanda broke up in December of last year. So much remains (frustratingly!) unclear about their split, but they had a bitter argument. According to Jonathan, Fernanda said things to him that he didn’t feel that he could ever unhear or that she could truly take back. He also cited Fernanda’s desire to live in a city, rather than in Lumberton, as a factor behind their marital friction. It has been said on social media that it was “common knowledge” that he cheated on her, but Fernanda has never actually made that accusation. Fernanda has said a lot of other things, however. Just this week, and notably only after Jonathan had signed his divorce papers, she accused him of not being as wealthy as people assume. She said that he owes more to the government than he makes. Fernanda emphasized that she was not trying to defame or degrade her ex-husband, and that she took no pleasure in dragging his name through the mud. Instead, she said that she was simply tired of being viewed as a gold digger and wanted to clear the air. But she also said that he was dead to her. There’s no love lost between these two. Not anymore. Jonathan responded to Fernanda’s posts by suggesting that he’d see her on his next vacation in Mexico. He met her while on vacation in Mexico City, and it seems obvious that he was trying to imply that she would be deported. However, as we have already reported, Fernanda posted a celebratory update about her legal residency back in April. She even recommended an immigration attorney to others. So … it’s not clear if she’ll actually leave the US any time soon. For now, we’re just a little disappointed in them both. Not for breaking up, but for not handling it as well as they might have. View Slideshow: Jonathan Rivera: 90 Day Fiance Alum Reveals New Girlfriend!
As you may have heard by now, Bradley Cooper and Irina Shayk have called it quits after four years of dating. The official account holds that there was no major drama, and the couple just drifted apart — but fans aren’t buying that narrative. The public always favors the most dramatic possible explanation for any celebrity breakup, and this time, they didn’t have to look very far in their search for potential drama. Ever since Cooper and Gaga’s intimate performance at the Oscars , there have been constant rumors that the collaborators started banging on the set of A Star Is Born and only tore themselves away long enough to make the occasional red carpet appearance. Not long after the film’s release, Gaga called off her engagement to Christian Carino , a development which added further grist to the rumor mill. Unless Gaga and Cooper officially announce that they’re a couple (which is the outcome the entire internet seems to be rooting for), we’ll probably never know for sure if there’s anything more than a platonic friendship between them. But it seems the mere suspicion that the co-stars were knocking boots may have been enough to prompt Shayk to call it quits: “Bradley’s relationship with baby mama Irina began to really fall apart when he started filming with Gaga and she accused him numerous times of cheating on her with his co-star,” a source close to the situation tells Radar Online. “Ever since then, Irina has not been able to trust Bradley at all.” Yes, according to Radar’s report, Shayk confronted Cooper, he denied engaging in any sort of infidelity, and she simply wasn’t convinced: “She doubted every single thing he said and she became incredibly jealous of Gaga,” says the insider. “She was also very possessive and controlling.” The source goes on to say that despite reports to the contrary, Cooper and Shayk’s breakup was decidedly not amicable: “The end of Bradley and Irina was a mess,” the tipster claimed. “All the two did was fight.” The cause of all that bickering? You guessed it — the suspiciously close offscreen relationship between Jackson Mayne and Ally. “Irina gets that he has to spend time with her, but she finds it totally inappropriate that he’s seeing so much of her at such odd hours,” an insider said last year when Brad and Lady were promoting A Star Is Born . “She’s very threatened by the situation.” One source claims the final straw for Shayk was an awards season photo in which a smudge of Gaga’s bright red lipstick could be seen on Cooper’s face. The couple reportedly tried to work things out for several months after the pic leaked, but this week, Shayk moved out of the home she had been sharing with Cooper. Sounds like the makings of a great country song!
90 Day Fiance: Happily Ever After? returns on Sunday, and it's anyone's guess whether Chantel and Pedro can make it work . After the way the Pedro betrayed Chantel, she knew that she had to come see him for herself — over his stern objections. In this sneak peek, we see her frosty reception at the airport. Oh dear. … “My parents think that it's a bad idea for me to follow Pedro,” Chantrel candidly informs the camera. She says that The Family Chantel is of this opinion “because Pedro's family is not on good terms with me.” That is a massive understatement. “But,” she notes. “He's mentioned starting a business … divorce.” “Now,” Chantel expresses. “I'm feeling like I really need to go there and find out for myself what's going on.” “I'm here in the airport in Santo Domingo,” Pedro narrates to the camera. He explains that he is “waiting for Chantel because she's coming today.” “I feel so disappointed,” Pedro admits. He feels disrespected “because we talk about this one, and I telling her that I need my own time in the Dominican Republic.” Pedro wanted time “with my friend, with my family..” “And she say, ‘No,'” he observes. “She say only, ‘I gonna come there.'” “I [brought] some flowers and a balloon for her,” Pedro explains to the camera. He says that he did so “because that's the way I do it every time when Chantel comes to Dominican Republic before.” “In the beginning,” Pedro recalls. “Chantel and me, I say, ‘I have the perfect woman in the world. I feel like heaven.'” “But now it's so different,” he laments. “But, even though I'm disappointed with Chantel, that she coming,” Pedro emphasizes. “I want her to know that I love her anyways.” Pedro is admittedly sending some very contradictory signals when Chantel arrives. His balloons say “Te quiero,” meaning I want you . It's the Spanish-speaking equivalent of I love you (because te amo comes on way too strong). But his intense resting b–chface is, well, frosty to say the least. Chantel is all smiles when she sees her husband, but Pedro is cold and standoffish, turning his head when she tries to kiss him. He barely says anything (on camerra at least) in terms of welcome, saying “hi” and “we can go?” That's … pretty harsh, dude. But even that unfeeling reception was apparently a positive sign in Chantel's book. “You really surprised me by showing up,” Chantel says with a smile. “The fact that Pedro did bring me flowers and a ballon,” she says to the cmaera. “Makes me see a glimmer of hope.” Chantel hopes that “he may want to put forth the same effort that I'm putting forth.” But she makes it clear that making an effort with Pedro does not mean that she's making an effort with his family. “While I'm in the Dominican Republic, I'm not going to stay with Pedro's mom and sister,” Chantel promises. She explains that this is “because I don't trust them with anything. I'm just going to leave it at that.” That's probably a smart decision. That said, given the recent horrific news stories of hotel guests in the DR being assaulted and murdered, maybe The Family Pedro isn't the worst option. Maybe.
For obvious reasons, it’s pretty uncommon for A-list celebrities to be thrown in prison. The justice system tends to look pretty favorably on the wealthy and well-connected, and if worse comes to worst, you can always just hire a fall guy. Still, when there’s even a remote possibility that a major star will get tossed in the clink we like to imagine how they would cope with life on the cell block. And in the case of Johnny Depp, we think the obvious answer is not very well at all! Sure, Depp’s played some major badasses over the course of his career, and he gets bonus points for being covered in tattoos. But turning over his many man-bracelets at the front gate would probably leave him with tear-streaked guyliner, and that’s just not a good look on day one. But we’re getting ahead of ourselves here. Why is it — you ask — that there’s a remote chance Johnny might end up rocking a county orange jumpsuit? Well, like every tabloid scandal in his life over the past three years, it all has to do with his messy marriage to Amber Heard. It’s been over two years since Depp and Heard finalized their divorce , but a recent lawsuit — filed by Johnny, ironically — has the ex-couple back in front of a judge. And now, Heard’s lawyers are alleging that Depp committed perjury when in his initial filing. Depp is suing Heard for $50 million in connection with a piece she wrote for the Washington Post in which she described herself as an abuse victim. According to Johnny, Amber’s article violated their non-disclosure agreement — and now he wants her to pay. Unfortunately, the legal action backfired in spectacular fashion, as court proceedings have resulted in one embarrassing revelation after another for the actor. Sure, the allegations have gone both ways. but the ones Heard has lobbed at Depp — including a story in which he became so jealous of James Franco that he flew into a violent rage — have been the most humiliating. And Amber’s latest accusation could have serious legal consequences. According to newly-filed documents obtained by The Blast , Depp “clearly perjured himself claiming that there was only one 911 call reporting his abuse on the evening of May 21, 2016.” Heard’s attorneys say Depp made the claim knowing full well that Amber’s friend iO Tillet Wright made multiple 911 calls the night of the alleged attack. “Readily obtainable public records of LAPD call logs from that evening show that iO Tillet Wright called 911 at 8:30 PM to report Mr. Depp’s violent and destructive behavior that evening, confirming the eyewitness accounts of how iO heard that Mr. Depp was becoming violent toward Ms. Heard over the phone and then called 911,” their filing reads. Now, people go to jail for perjury all the time. But very few of those people have anchored multi-billion dollar Disney franchises. So Depp probably won’t be getting locked up — but this isn’t great news for his already-battered reputation. How many crimes does this guy have to commit to research his role as Grindelwald? Yeesh! View Slideshow: Johnny Depp Opens Up About Drugs, Debt, Divorce In Bonkers Interview
Madonna has never hesitated to call out her critics and body shamers , but this time, it’s a little different. In a new profile for the New York Times , she drew attention after describing her negative experiences with Harvey Weinstein. But now, on social media, Madonna is blasting the article and its author, calling both a tool of the patriarchy . Before we get into Madonna’s furious response to the article, the article itself is worth mentioning. The New York Times did a profile on Madonna, titled: “Madonna at Sixty.” The subtitle explained that it was a detailed look at Madonna’s view of “aging, inspiration, and why she refuses to cede control.” Within the profile, Madonna discusses how Harvey Weinstein “crossed lines and boundaries” with her. This allegedly went down during the making of her 1991 documentary, “Truth or Dare.” Madonna mentions that Weinstein had been “incredibly sexually flirtatious and forward with me when we were working together.” “I was aware that he did the same with a lot of other women that I knew in the business,” Madonna admits. Madonna is quoted as having operated under a mindset that Harvey Weinstein’s power made his behavior necessary to tolerate. “‘He’s so successful and his movies do so well and everybody wants to work with him,'” Madonna recalls feeling. “‘So you have to put up with it.'” We’ve heard that horrifying mentality from so many people. Terrible that it went on for decades. But her quotes regarding Weinstein may be the one thing that didn’t make Madonna furious about the article. Taking to her Instagram, the music legend put the New York Times on blast. She specifically excoriated the article’s author, a woman named Vanessa Grigoriadis. “To say that I was disappointed in the article would be an understatement,” Madonna writes. She goes on to accuse the article and newspaper of ageism, sexism, and of betraying her trust. “It seems,” Madonna reflects. “You can’t fix society.” She has certainly tried to do so over her career, but it seems that she is despairing that society has so much further to go. “And,” she continues, laying into society and “its endless need to diminish, disparage or degrade that which they know is good.” Madonna observes: “Especially strong independent women.” Women like herself, she means. “The journalist who wrote this article spent days and hours and months with me,” Madonna writes. “And,” she notes, the writer “was invited into a world which many people dont get to see,” “But,” Madonna laments, the journalist “chose to focus on trivial and superficial matters such as the ethnicity of my stand in or the fabric of my curtains.” “And,” she points out. “Never ending comments about my age.” Madonna asserts, probably correctly, that this is something “which would never have been mentioned had I been a MAN!” “Women have a really hard time being the champions of other women,” Madonna expresses in despair. She says that this is true “even if. they are posing as intellectual feminists.” Everyone has blindspots, even within the feminist community. Madonna clearly has major regrets about this profile. “I’m sorry i spent 5 minutes with her,” Madonna writes. “It makes me feel raped,” Madonna writes. “And yes I’m allowed to use that analogy having been raped at the age of 19.” While we are deeply sorry for her horrific experience, most people feel that even rape survivors should be careful with their analogies. “Further proof that the venerable N.Y.T. Is one of the founding fathers of the Patriarchy,” she accuses. Patriarchal cultural forces are pernicious … and much, much older than the New York Times . Or the English language. Or writing itself. “And I say — DEATH TO THE PATRIARCHY woven deep into the fabric of Society,” Madonna expresses. She concludes: “I will never stop fighting to eradicate it.” View Slideshow: Donald Trump Impeachment Party: Who’s Attending?
Madonna has never hesitated to call out her critics and body shamers , but this time, it’s a little different. In a new profile for the New York Times , she drew attention after describing her negative experiences with Harvey Weinstein. But now, on social media, Madonna is blasting the article and its author, calling both a tool of the patriarchy . Before we get into Madonna’s furious response to the article, the article itself is worth mentioning. The New York Times did a profile on Madonna, titled: “Madonna at Sixty.” The subtitle explained that it was a detailed look at Madonna’s view of “aging, inspiration, and why she refuses to cede control.” Within the profile, Madonna discusses how Harvey Weinstein “crossed lines and boundaries” with her. This allegedly went down during the making of her 1991 documentary, “Truth or Dare.” Madonna mentions that Weinstein had been “incredibly sexually flirtatious and forward with me when we were working together.” “I was aware that he did the same with a lot of other women that I knew in the business,” Madonna admits. Madonna is quoted as having operated under a mindset that Harvey Weinstein’s power made his behavior necessary to tolerate. “‘He’s so successful and his movies do so well and everybody wants to work with him,'” Madonna recalls feeling. “‘So you have to put up with it.'” We’ve heard that horrifying mentality from so many people. Terrible that it went on for decades. But her quotes regarding Weinstein may be the one thing that didn’t make Madonna furious about the article. Taking to her Instagram, the music legend put the New York Times on blast. She specifically excoriated the article’s author, a woman named Vanessa Grigoriadis. “To say that I was disappointed in the article would be an understatement,” Madonna writes. She goes on to accuse the article and newspaper of ageism, sexism, and of betraying her trust. “It seems,” Madonna reflects. “You can’t fix society.” She has certainly tried to do so over her career, but it seems that she is despairing that society has so much further to go. “And,” she continues, laying into society and “its endless need to diminish, disparage or degrade that which they know is good.” Madonna observes: “Especially strong independent women.” Women like herself, she means. “The journalist who wrote this article spent days and hours and months with me,” Madonna writes. “And,” she notes, the writer “was invited into a world which many people dont get to see,” “But,” Madonna laments, the journalist “chose to focus on trivial and superficial matters such as the ethnicity of my stand in or the fabric of my curtains.” “And,” she points out. “Never ending comments about my age.” Madonna asserts, probably correctly, that this is something “which would never have been mentioned had I been a MAN!” “Women have a really hard time being the champions of other women,” Madonna expresses in despair. She says that this is true “even if. they are posing as intellectual feminists.” Everyone has blindspots, even within the feminist community. Madonna clearly has major regrets about this profile. “I’m sorry i spent 5 minutes with her,” Madonna writes. “It makes me feel raped,” Madonna writes. “And yes I’m allowed to use that analogy having been raped at the age of 19.” While we are deeply sorry for her horrific experience, most people feel that even rape survivors should be careful with their analogies. “Further proof that the venerable N.Y.T. Is one of the founding fathers of the Patriarchy,” she accuses. Patriarchal cultural forces are pernicious … and much, much older than the New York Times . Or the English language. Or writing itself. “And I say — DEATH TO THE PATRIARCHY woven deep into the fabric of Society,” Madonna expresses. She concludes: “I will never stop fighting to eradicate it.” View Slideshow: Donald Trump Impeachment Party: Who’s Attending?
In a word? YIKES! Radar Online has obtained a recording of Jenelle Evans calling 911 on December 23, 2018 because – according to Jenelle – David Eason was brandishing a gun and trying to break into her home. This call was placed just two months after Jenelle also called 911 on Eason for allegedly breaking her collarbone during one of his many drunken escapades. What prompted Eason's violent mood this time around? What did Jenelle tell the dispatcher about her husband? And how much crazier can things get between these two?!? Scroll down for the answers… 1. Wait, Jenelle Seriously Called 911 Again? Yes. The recording has now been made public while Jenelle and David fight for the custody of their children. 2. You Know Why, Right? Because of Eason, basically. Don’t get us wrong, Jenelel has been rather irresponsible herself … but child protection services paid Evans and Eason a visit after the latter murdered their family dog with his shotgun. 3. Yes, This Really Happened Eason showed no remorse for the act, either. He and Jenelle have been to court many times since their kids were taken away, but a judge has declared their home to be unsafe for children and not placed a time table on when, if ever, the couple will be given the young ones back. 4. This Newly-Released Call Won’t Help Their Case That’s for certain. 5. What Does Jenelle Say in This December 2018 Call? “My husband is freaking out,” she tells the operator. “He’s outside freaking out. He’s smashing our front door trying to get inside.” 6. Where Was Evans While Evans Was Acting This Way? In the attic, she says on the call. View Slideshow
Do you ever just check in on the latest comings and goings of Jenelle and just get totally exhausted? If not, well … get ready to experience that phenomenon. Because yeah, sure, things have been pretty intense in her world lately, but even by those standards, what happened yesterday was just utterly insane. We've got Jenelle fighting with Barbara, David fighting with Nathan, accusations of child abuse and hard drug use, talk of restraining orders … And a great big delusional interview from Jenelle to top it all off. If all of this sounds like something you'd be interested in — and trust us, it really is — then settle in and we'll get going. 1. Some Background Info To understand all that happened yesterday, you need to know a couple of things, and one of them is that Jenelle has a very, VERY troubled history with her mother, Barbara. 2. The History Jenelle and Barbara’s problems go all the way back to when she was a child — she’s said that she never felt like her mother offered her the love and care she needed, and their relationship only got worse after Jenelle signed over custody of her youngest son, Jace, when he was an infant. 3. So Many Troubles Barbara has taken good care of Jace, and she does have full, permanent custody of him now, but there were several years there where we saw Jenelle scream and cry and pretty much despise her mom for not just handing the kid back over, even though she was seriously troubled for a long time — she was getting arrested all the time, in and out of abusive relationships, and dealing with drug problems. 4. Ouch Since there was so much animosity over Barbara having custody of Jace, it must really be difficult for Jenelle to see her get custody of Ensley, too. 5. Of Course That’s the other thing you need to know — that Barbara currently has custody of Ensley after CPS removed all the kids from Jenelle’s home following David’s brutal killing of the family’s French bulldog, Nugget. 6. Let’s Go So that’s where we are now: Jenelle and David don’t have custody of any of their kids, they’ve been having to go to court weekly to keep up with everything and have their supervised visits, and their golden child, Ensley, is with one of their worst enemies at the moment, Barbara. How could this possibly go wrong?! View Slideshow
All good things must come to an end. And as for Kourtney Kardashian, well she seems to be quite ready for it. Keeping Up with the Kardashians has been airing for over 10 years on E! — giving us an up-close look at Hollywood’s most famous family dynasty — but now, Kourt is speaking out about how tired of the spotlight she really is. In the beginning, the sisters delivered. They had spin-off shows, family vacations worth an entire year of drama , and yeah — that one store. But after the demise of Dash, a few divorces, and many (many!) babies later, some viewers are beginning to argue that the sister act may have run its course. Especially when it comes to Kourtney — who is thought to be the least enthusiastic of the group . During the iHeartRadio’s 102.7 KIIS-FM Wango Tango concert, KUWTK executive producer Ryan Seacrest was told that this Kardashian, in particular, had said that she would be happy to say goodbye to the series! To which he replied, “She would?!” The Live with Kelly and Ryan co-host explained that while he understands the mom of three may need a break from the televised series, he would need her to eventually return . “Well, if the cameras go away, as long as they come back, Kourtney,” he said. “You know, they can go away for a little bit, but bring ’em back so we can do another season or two.” He means twenty, right?! “Honestly I don’t know how they do it,” he admitted. We don’t know how they do it either, but they just do and we’re not ready for this. Not at all! “They lived for over a decade with cameras following [them], I could not do it, no matter what they were paying [me],” Seacrest said. “I could not do it, so I give them a lot of credit for having those cameras in their lives at all time.” “And I love you, Kourtney. Love her,” he says. The question was posed to Seacrest after Kourtney said she would be “very happy” if the cameras were to switch off during an interview with Paper magazine. “I always say I want to move away someday and just be away from it all,” Kourtney said. “Sail away. No one will ever see me again. I keep throwing up different places, but then I’ll go and visit and I’ll be like, ‘Nope, this isn’t it, but glad I came.” “We’ve just been to Finland. And I was like, ‘Check, it’s great for me to visit, but I’m not going to move there,” she contested. “Maybe Norway. Switzerland? I’ve got a lot of ideas.” We’ve got an idea — don’t leave! The Kardashians rose to fame and became instant celebrities after KUWTK premiered back in 2007, and every sister has since created their own lucrative business venture. The 40-year-olds most recent project is Poosh , a new website which is half blog/half shop for natural and organic products. “I feel like I’m constantly asked, ‘How do you do this? What’s the salad you guys are eating on your show?'” she said. “It’s nice to share it with people and have the space to do so.” She does have some very helpful suggestions on the site, I must say. View Slideshow: Kourtney Kardashian Accused of Promoting Incest with Creepy New Photo
