Tag Archives: jesus

Early Christians Condoned Gay Marriage

Many of the world's religions — including Christianity — supported same-sex unions, a reality obscured by modern-day shrill, conservative commentary. Through much of history, especially prior to the Fourteenth Century, many Christians did not share the view that marriage was a reward for being heterosexual, nor that a same-sex union was objectionable. An icon from St. Catherine’s monastery on Mount Sinai illustrates this point. It shows two robed Christian saints getting married. Their pronubus (official witness, or “best man”) is none other than Jesus Christ. It is a standard Roman portrayal of a wedding. The difference: the two saints are both male, Fourth Century Christian martyrs, Saint Serge and Saint Bacchus, close friends in the Roman army who were purportedly singled out for their secret adherence to Christianity before being tortured and killed. Their unity, considered romantic by some historians and depicted through the image of marriage at St. Catherine’s monastery, was commemorated in many subsequent liturgies. The late Yale historian John Boswell found evidence for other Christian same-sex marriage ceremonies continuing even into the Eighteenth Century. added by: toyotabedzrock

WaPo Publishes Puffy 25-Paragraph Story: ‘When It Comes to Praying, Obama Prefers Privacy’

” When it comes to praying, Obama prefers privacy. ” Thus reads the page A2 headline for Michael Shear’s August 20 Washington Post story that reads like an extended Obama White House campaign press release. Shear opens with a story about how Obama prayed with “three Christian pastors” over the phone as he flew to Chicago to celebrate his 49th birthday. “As he celebrated his birthday, he was in a reflective mood,” Shear cooed. “He told them he wanted to pray about the year that had passed, what’s really important in life and the challenges ahead,” the Post staffer added before cuing up Joel Hunter, “an evangelical pastor who ws on the call and who is part of a small circle of spiritual advisers who frequently talk to Obama by phone.” Hunter served up the argument of Shear’s article, that because Obama is private about his Christian faith, it’s no wonder polls show a growing number of people unsure of his faith, with some even thinking he’s a Muslim. “You know what happens with a vacuum?” Hunter asked, before answering his own question, “It gets filled.” Aside from Hunter and Obama himself, Shear quoted only Obama staffers: deputy press secretary Bill Burton and Joshua DuBois, Obama’s “chief faith adviser in the White House.” Shear failed to raise any Christian leaders who, for instance, might question how a Christian like Obama could be as staunchly opposed as he is to any restriction on abortion rights. Shear also noted that Obama “talked about his belief in Jesus’s resurrection” at an Easter breakfast earlier this year, going on to quote the relevant passage in the next paragraph. Yet Shear failed to recognize that Obama’s mishmash of spiritual beliefs aren’t exactly in line with the exclusivist claims of historic, orthodox Christianity. Indeed, one can detect a bit of Clintonian word-wrangling in an 2004 interview with Cathleen Falsani of the Chicago Sun-Times , particularly when Obama tackles the meaning of Jesus’ statement that he alone is “the way, the truth, and the life” (emphasis mine): “I am a Christian,” the 42-year-old Illinois state senator and Democratic candidate for the U.S. Senate says, as one of the nearby customers interrupts to congratulate him on his recent primary win. Obama shakes the man’s hand and says, “Thank you very much. I appreciate that,” before turning his attention directly back to the question. “So, I have a deep faith,” Obama continues. “I’m rooted in the Christian tradition. I believe that there are many paths to the same place , and that is a belief that there is a higher power, a belief that we are connected as a people. “That there are values that transcend race or culture, that move us forward, and there’s an obligation for all of us individually as well as collectively to take responsibility to make those values lived.” It’s perhaps an unlikely theological position for someone who places his faith squarely at the feet of Jesus to take, saying essentially that all people of faith — Christians, Jews, Muslims, animists, everyone — know the same God. That depends, Obama says, on how a particular verse from the Gospel of John, where Jesus says, ” I am the way, the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father but by me,” is heard.

More here:
WaPo Publishes Puffy 25-Paragraph Story: ‘When It Comes to Praying, Obama Prefers Privacy’

Five for Five: Top Five Journalistic Obamagasms Exposed by NewsBusters | Round 4 of T-shirt Winners

Editor’s Note: For the list of NewsBusters T-shirt contest winners, skip to the end of this post. Click here to enter the contest . It’s time once again for “Five for Five,” this time around we unveil the top five Journalistic Obamagasms Exposed by NewsBusters. We know what you’re thinking: “Only five?!” Since they’re all so equally good, or bad, as the case may be, I’ll leave it to you folks to rank them in the comments section. They are: Chris Matthews’s restless leg syndrome [“Matthews: Obama Speech Caused ‘Thrill Going Up My Leg'” from February 13, 2008]  The birds of the air declaring the glory of Barack [“ABC: ‘National Pride’ Made Cold Feel Warmer as Seagulls ‘Awed’ by Obama’s Inaugural” from January 20, 2009] Evan Thomas (sort of) deifying Obama [“Newsweek’s Evan Thomas: Obama Is ‘Sort of God'” from June 5, 2009] Chris Matthews explaining his mission in life [“Matthews: My Job Is to Make Obama Presidency a Success” from November 6, 2008] Time magazine wishing everyone a Merry Obamamas [“Time Mag: Obama a ‘Prince’ Like Jesus Born of ‘Imagination, History and Hope'” from November 11, 2008] And now, as promised, the fourth round of winners in our 5th anniversary T-shirt giveaway . If you’re names not listed below, there’s still a chance to win. Click here to register . Congratulations to: Harriett G. of Anderson, Ind. Michael B. of Everglades City, Fla. Kimberly D. of Los Alamos, Calif. April E. of Youngstown, Ohio Michael E. of Shelbyville, Ind. Loran C. of San Francisco, Calif. Paul L. of Peaks Island, Maine Laurel A. of Aurora, Colo. Joseph Y. of Springfield, Ky. Chester S. of La Grande, Ore. Matt T. of Los Angeles, Calif. Debbie S. of Joliet, Ill. Helene S. of Elgin, Tex. Paul H. of West Chester, Pa. Nick L. of Concord, N.C. Steven J. of Naples, Fla. Eileen B. of Poughkeepsie, N.Y. John F. of Herndon, Va. Kenneth E. of Wichita, Kan. Keith R. of Kalispell, Mont. H.R. H. of Berlin, Md. Max A. of Lenoir, N.C. Fredrick G. of San Diego, Calif. Savanah M. of Roswell, Ga. Margaret B. of Kenner, La.

View post:
Five for Five: Top Five Journalistic Obamagasms Exposed by NewsBusters | Round 4 of T-shirt Winners

Everyday Stripper of the Day

I have always said that all girls are fucking strippers, some just aren’t as confident as others to do the shit in public, while others have been brainwashed to think that stripping is bad, so that when they do it, they feel all dirty and wrong, like Jesus is watching over them judging. I have also always said that all girls are whores and that some just work for money, while other’s work for status and lifestyle, but the core of it is all the fucking self-involved, out for personal gain, using your pussy to get ahead same. I am not a scientist, but assume it’s gotta do with evolution and instincts that we’ve tried to repress all these years of “ciilization”…. That said, every once in a while, enough drugs makes one of these bitches who is on the fence tap into her instinct and you get public stripping in a place where strippers don’t work. I’ve seen it at least 5 times at bars. I’ve seen it on the street. I’ve even seen it at the stripclub when four 18 year olds on vacation thought it’d be a good idea to ask the DJ to try stripping…it is cuz girls of all shapes and all sizes are attention seeking whores…and if titties are involved, even fat lesbian titties with nasty pussy, I’m ok with it….if anything, it’s the one thing I love in the world…which is saying a lot for someone incapable of emotions…

Visit link:
Everyday Stripper of the Day

Olbermann Mocks Bozell, NewsBusters as ‘Worst Person in the World’

MSNBC’s Keith Olbermann named MRC president Brent Bozell Wednesday’s “Worst Person in the World” for my NewsBusters post on Jon Stewart’s sneering attack on  conservatives as supposedly being opponents of religious freedom over the Ground Zero Mosque controversy. (Audio here .) Predictably, in choosing this dishonor, Olbermann was playing rip-and-read from certain Hillary Clinton-founded Fox-and-Rush watchdogs, as he routinely acts as the TV Xerox of the Bush-Hating Left-Wing Blogosphere. Olbermann also re-tweeted them yesterday . None of these analysts on the left evaluated their own tendency to see grave threats to freedom of religion and church-state separation from Christian evangelists, but nothing at all threatening to their swaggering secular coolness from Islamic advocates of “dialogue.” (See, for example, one take on the Ground Zero Imam Feisal Abdul-Rauf’s views on America’s “Shariah compliance.” Hello, Barry Lynn?) Here’s the transcript:   OLBERMANN: But our winner, Brent Bozell of the hilarious Media Research Center and NewsBusters — not happy that John Stewart criticized the anti-American frenzy by conservatives to stop the building of houses of worship for Muslims. “Stewart,” writes Tim Graham on NewsBusters, quote, “mocked conservatives for having no respect for freedom of religion. This from Comedy Central, the network that mocks Jesus and Christians relentlessly but censors whenever the radical Muslims threaten them? Yes, Stewart was arguing for the greatness of Islam that it should be accepted with great tolerance as a global religion.” Except, of course, when Comedy Central folded in front of Muslim protests over an episode of South Park , Stewart mocked Comedy Central. You know how I know that? Graham’s own Media Research Center and NewsBusters applauded Stewart for doing it. One Lachlan Markay wrote, “Jon Stewart noted the blatant censorship his employer Comedy Central exercised against its popular show South Park by banning it from showing and even uttering the word ‘Mohammed’ in this week’s episode after a threat came forward from an Islamic group. His extensive recap of all the religions the show has made fun of over the years was clearly a critique of Comedy Central’s decision.” Clearly, people at NewsBusters are not relying on their own Web site for information. Then again, with their kind of track record, who would? Brent Bozell of the somewhat self-destructive NewsBusters and Media Research Council [sic], today’s “Worst Person” – hey, beard – “in the World”! I wrote that Stewart and his network shouldn’t “cower” before Muslim critics as they trash Christians. But it’s clear that Lachlan reported that Stewart mocked radical Islam (sort of) over the Comedy Central censorship in April. He lightly made fun of the bosses, and then lightly mocked the Muslim death-threateners with Jewish-deli-and-Frisbee jokes: They “try to intimidate the creators of South Park all while enjoying our lovely theater district, our many diverse restaurants including really the best Jewish delis you’ll find and our new high line park. It’s a park made out of an elevated train line. It’s a super-thin park in the sky. Let’s play Frisbee.” Radical Muslims make death threats; Stewart makes Frisbee jokes and mocks gospel choirs with his “F-You” song. That hardly compares in tone and temper to another April bit, Stewart trashing the 21st-century Catholic Church for heinous massacres in the 13th  as well as everything from Galileo to the Spanish Inquisition: SAMANTHA BEE: The Cathars, the gnostic sect in 13th century France. STEWART: I still got nothing there. BEE: Tens of thousands of them were massacred under the direct authority of Pope Innocent III, persecuted out of existence by the Catholic Church. STEWART: Oh, I see. BEE: Well, that’s what you’re doing now. STEWART: Sam, see, if any other organization had done anything close to what the church is being accused of, they’d be done! The church is barely showing any contrition. Stewart also made fun of Christian “Islamophobes” and Fox News in early July when the bizarre story of NASA administrator Charles Bolden’s Islamic outreach broke. Clearly, the cable news stars on the Left plays the enemy-of-my-enemy-is-my-friend game. Just like they were anti-anti-Communist, now they’re anti-anti-Islamist. 

See more here:
Olbermann Mocks Bozell, NewsBusters as ‘Worst Person in the World’

Churchgoers, strippers protest one another in Coshocton County

Of ire and brimstone Monday, August 9, 2010 02:54 AM By Holly Zachariah THE COLUMBUS DISPATCH WARSAW, Ohio — Strip-club owner Tommy George rolled up to the church in his grabber-orange Dodge Challenger, drinking a Mountain Dew at 9 in the morning and smoking a cigarette he had just rolled himself. Pastor Bill Dunfee stepped out of a tan Nissan Murano, clutching a Bible in one hand and his sermon in the other, a touch of spray holding his perfectly coiffed 'do in place. Inside the New Beginnings Ministries church, Dunfee's worshippers wore polyester and pearls. Outside, George's strippers wore bikinis and belly rings. Both men agree it is classic sinners vs. saints. But George says it is up to America to decide which is which and who is who. Dunfee says God already has chosen. “Tom George is a parasite, a man without judgment,” Dunfee said. “The word of Jesus Christ says you cannot share territory with the devil.” The battle that has heretofore played out in the parking lot of George's strip club – the Foxhole, a run-down, garage-like building at a Coshocton County crossroads called Newcastle – has shifted 7 miles east to Church Street. Every weekend for the last four years, Dunfee and members of his ministry have stood watch over George's joint, taking up residence in the right of way with signs, video cameras and bullhorns in hand. They videotape customers' license plates and post them online, and they try to save the souls of anyone who comes and goes. Now, the dancers have turned the tables, so to speak. Fed up with the tactics of Dunfee and his flock, they say they have finally accepted his constant invitation to come to church. It's just that they've come wearing see-through shorts and toting Super Soakers. They bring lawn chairs and – yesterday, anyway – grilled hamburgers, Monster energy drinks and corn on the cob. They sat in front of the church and waved at passing cars but largely ignored the congregation behind them. Likewise, the churchgoers largely ignored the dancers. Except for Stan Braxton. He stopped and held hands with Lola, a 42-year-old dancer who made $200 on her Saturday night shift, and prayed for her salvation. Lola, who wouldn't give her last name, said she was grateful for Braxton's prayers and his time. The women don't come here, after all, without their own version of religion. They bring signs with Scriptures written in neon colors: Matthew 7:15: Beware of false prophets who come to you in sheep's clothing Revelations 22:11: He that is unjust, let him be unjust still Greg Flaig is executive director of the Ohio Owners Coalition, a group of showbar and club owners. He called the women's protest extraordinary, saying he's never heard of anything like it in the country. George said the protest has been a long time coming. He sued the church in federal court several years ago, claiming a violation of his constitutional rights, but he lost. Now, he said, turnabout is fair play. “When these morons go away, we'll go away,” George said. “The great thing about this country is that everyone has a right to believe what they want.” He said his club operates within the law. Dunfee said it does not, that it must close at midnight instead of its regular 2 or 3 a.m. Coshocton County Prosecutor Bob Batchelor said Friday only that he, the sheriff and the city prosecutor are “aware of the situation.” Gina Hughes spent the morning soaking up the sun in her striped bikini, mostly oblivious to the fire and brimstone being preached in the tidy church building. The 30-year-old married mother of six said she has danced at the Foxhole for a decade and holds the title of “house mom.” That means that even though she still dances, she also watches out for the six other women who work there. She said she makes $2,000 a week. “These church people say horrible things about us,” Hughes said. “They say we're homewreckers and whores. The fact of the matter is, we're working to keep our own homes together, to give our kids what they need.” Dunfee said it's not that simple. He said he consistently offers the women help, a chance at redemption. “I tell them, 'I will put a roof over your heads, and your bills will be paid, and your children's bellies will be full,'” he said. Yet they don't come inside. The first few weeks, Dunfee piped the sermon outside. But that “agitated” them, he said, and made them dance in the streets. He said their presence has united his church members and reinvigorated their mission to shut down the club. “They have now seen the evil firsthand,” Dunfee said. “This has just made us stronger.” George laughed at that notion. “They're just mad,” he said, “because their wives won't let them come to my club.” hzachariah@dispatch.com added by: putdownmypants

‘I Feel Like I Don’t Live In America:’ The Best Worst Prop 8 Reactions

Yesterday, a federal judge ruled that Proposition 8 — the voter initiative that amended the California Constitution to define marriage as heterosexual — is unconstitutional. The usual pro-Prop 8, anti-gay marriage suspects began hollering almost immediately. Here, the best of the best (or worst, depending on how you look at it): The Founding Fathers Would Be Shocked From the chairman of National Organization for Marriage, or NOM: Here we have an openly gay (according to the San Francisco Chronicle) federal judge substituting his views for those of the American people and of our Founding Fathers who I promise you would be shocked by courts that imagine they have the right to put gay marriage in our Constitution. Shocked, probably. But $10 says the Founding Fathers would also be shocked by women wearing pants, a black man becoming president and cable news. But The Judge Is Gay From the president of the American Family Association: It's also extremely problematic that Judge Walker is a practicing homosexual himself. He should have recused himself from this case, because his judgment is clearly compromised by his own sexual proclivity. The fundamental issue here is whether homosexual conduct, with all its physical and psychological risks, should be promoted and endorsed by society. That's why the people and elected officials accountable to the people should be setting marriage policy, not a black-robed tyrant whose own lifestyle choices make it impossible to believe he could be impartial. His situation is no different than a judge who owns a porn studio being asked to rule on an anti-pornography statute. He'd have to recuse himself on conflict of interest grounds, and Judge Walker should have done that. This Will Be Dangerous When We Have A Lesbian On The Supreme Court From former House Speaker Newt Gingrich: Today's notorious decision also underscores the importance of the Senate vote tomorrow on the nomination of Elena Kagan to the Supreme Court because judges who oppose the American people are a growing threat to our society. In other words, “cough cough Kagan's totally gay cough.” What Next? Is Jesus Unconstitutional? From Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC): Today's wrongful court decision is another attempt to impose a secular immorality on the American people who keep voting to preserve traditional marriage. added by: TimALoftis

Pro-Life Students want Rubber Fetus Ban Overturned

Rubber fetuses given out by pro-life students at high schools in Roswell, New Mexico were banned because they were “distracting the educational environment.” The want for the ban to be overturned has created a court case bringing to question where the first amendment lies in the situation. Matt Reynolds of OnPoint details: The suspensions of seven pro-life students at two Roswell, N.M., high schools for distributing rubber fetuses have given birth to a lawsuit that takes the First Amendment protections for student speech into uncharted territory. The students, who belong to a religious youth group called Relentless in Roswell, sued school officials last month, alleging their suspensions were unconstitutional. They were disciplined in February after they handed out hundreds of fetus dolls at Goddard and Roswell High Schools before classes. The complaint describes the dolls as two inches in length and “the actual size and weight of a developing unborn child at 12 weeks’ gestation.” Attached to the dolls was a verse from the Bible: “For you formed my inward parts; You wove me in my mother's womb. I will give thanks to You, for I am fearfully and wonderfully made; Wonderful are your works.” “With a tangible and compelling communication medium,” the suit says, Plaintiffs sought to inform the other students of the truth about abortion, to point them to God, the Creator and protector of life in the womb, to encourage them to protect the life of the unborn, and to provide information concerning alternatives to abortion that would result in saving the babies instead of destroying them. Liberty Counsel, a conservative advocacy group, is representing the plaintiffs, who are seeking injunctive relief and the return of dolls that were confiscated by school officials. Under the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community Sch. Dist., 393 U.S. 503 (1969), officials can only censor student speech that would seriously disrupt classroom or school activities. And pro-life activists in the nation’s schools have a track record of success in cases involving such materials as buttons, t-shirts and flyers. Earlier this year, a New Jersey judge found a student was improperly suspended for distributing pro-life flyers, noting there was no evidence that other students were upset by the flyers and “this somehow caused a disruption to the learning environment.” C.H. v. Bridgeton Board of Education. But there appears to be no case that addresses the distribution in schools of a graphic pro-life prop such as a rubber fetus. The Relentless in Roswell plaintiffs started out handing out more innocuous religious materials, including candy canes and painted “affirmation rocks.” On Jan. 29, they first attempted to distribute the rubber fetuses to which they had attached, in addition to the Bible verse, contact information for a church-affiliated pregnancy counseling center. Before classes started that day, a Goddard High administrator allegedly told the Relentless students, “It’s time to shut this down … Some people are getting offended.” He then confiscated containers holding hundreds of the rubber babies. At the Roswell High campus, the principal sent an e-mail to faculty which said the dolls should be confiscated since “These materials have NOT been approved from our central office for distribution.” The prior approval issue is likely to be part of the Roswell Independent School District's defense. The district's policy says in part: “Promotional activities must be approved by the school principal.” But the Relentless students say in their suit that the rubber babies were not “'advertising' or 'promotional' items in any commercial sense; they 'promoted' only [pro-life] ideas.” As far as offensiveness, the rubber fetuses may be more extreme than flyers and t-shirts. But in the recent “Bong Hits 4 Jesus” case, the Supreme Court rejected the idea that student speech is “proscribable because it is plainly 'offensive.'” Morse v. Frederick, 127 S. Ct. 2618 (2007). Even if the dolls upset some students, the Roswell district won't carry the day unless it can show “a disruption to the learning environment.” added by: Stoneyroad

‘If I Had a Hammer’: WaPo Hippie Columnist Would Like to Pummel GOP Folk Singer

Washington Post Magazine humorist Gene Weingarten reacted badly in his Sunday column to the discovery that folk singer Arlo Guthrie is now a registered Republican: “By becoming a Republican, Arlo Guthrie has shredded the last remnants of my faith that our hippie principles had any lasting meaning. How can he do this to us? I’m a peaceable man, but if I had a hammer…” Guthrie didn’t become one of those warmongering neocons. He endorsed Ron Paul for president in early 2008. But Weingarten began with his marijuana-baked enthusiasm for hippiedom, which he clearly still loves dearly: Like many middle-age people, I wear more than one hat. I’m a husband, a father, a journalist, a role model to a generation of idealistic young Americans, etc. But one of my favorite hats, the floppy felt one that still smells faintly of the sweet smoke of a controlled substance, is “former hippie.” We children of the ’60s tenaciously hold on to this self-image, even though our mirrors tell us that in terms of sheer hipness, we look more like Arlen Specter than Arlo Guthrie. Weingarten — who is not simply a yuk-yuk man, but a man who used to edit the Post’s influential Style section — discovered that Arlo Guthrie’s “iconic, self-deprecating, darkly comic, anti-war counterculture masterpiece” of a song “Alice’s Restaurant” didn’t make complete sense as nonfiction. The song no longer seemed to “speak truth to power.” So he called Guthrie up: Me: So, you were arrested for illegally dumping a half-ton of garbage that you scooped up from the floor of Alice’s home, and took away to dispose of as a favor, right? Arlo: Right. Me: And you were nailed by the fuzz because Officer Obie found your name on an envelope in that half-ton pile of garbage and phoned you. And in the funniest line of the song, you solemnly admitted to Officer Obie that you had put that envelope under that half-ton of garbage, right? Arlo: Right. Me: Why was your name in the garbage from Alice’s restaurant? Wasn’t that all Alice’s garbage? Arlo: In 40 years, no one ever asked me that. Me: Well, someone is asking now. Arlo: Bravo. I will hate you forever for this. Me: [Pause] Arlo: Okay, we have to attribute that line to creative license. Obie actually found a paper with Ray’s name — Ray was Alice’s husband — and Ray directed them to me. But it worked better in the song the other way. Me: So, no biggie? A misstatement is okay because it “worked better”? Guthrie didn’t answer, but Weingarten compared his worship of Guthrie’s “counterculture masterpiece” to the miracles of Jesus: Me: I don’t want to overstate my disillusionment here. But this is like hearing Jesus say, “Okay, I didn’t turn the water into wine, exactly. Actually, I just added some Kool-Aid powder and turned it into a nice, refreshing beverage.” Weingarten learned Guthrie’s party affiliation by further complaining: “Did you learn your ethics from your dad [socialist folk singer Woody Guthrie]? Might it be that this land was really made for him and just a few of his cronies?” Arlo responded: “You know, it’s possible. I’ve heard that song sung at Republican conventions.” This means that Arlo Guthrie is actually more light-hearted about his politics than the humor writer is.

Read more from the original source:
‘If I Had a Hammer’: WaPo Hippie Columnist Would Like to Pummel GOP Folk Singer

Bozell Column: Art in America

The Bravo cable network has a new reality show called “Work of Art,” a competition dedicated to finding the next great American artist. The half-dozen contestants, 20-something aspiring artists all, enter the famous Phillips de Pury art auction house. Mr. de Pury himself ushers them into the special room where they are presented with a collection of paintings by Andres Serrano, the man who came to fame in 1989 with the ghastly painting, sponsored by the National Endowment of the Arts, depicting a crucifix dunked in a jar of urine. They are hugely impressed. The final painting they are shown is just that — the original “Piss Christ.” They are in awe, quietly expressing their amazement at the talent. And then the door opens and in steps the master. The students freeze, eyes bright, mouths agape. The curator announces, “the great, great Serrano!” One girl instinctively bows reverently. Serrano explains his art. “Life, art, politics. It’s all the same s—-…. People in general always think their s—- is the best. So if you really want to see some real s—-, check out my s—-.” Six times he utters the expletive; the students giggle with glee. And now the contestants are given their assignment: Create a body of art as shocking as that of Serrano. The judges will select the four contestants who will proceed to the next round. More giggles and laughter. Each artist is given a $100 voucher with which to buy supplies. One man says he will make an artwork about that “taboo theme,” the sexually abusive priest. “It’s not an anti-religion piece,” he claims. “I don’t know anybody personally who’s been sexually abused by a priest, but I read a statistic once that said there were more Catholic priests living with AIDS than there were everyone else.” Besides garbled syntax, it is pure idiocy. He can’t possibly think a small group of homosexual priests represents the largest grouping of the million-plus Americans living with HIV or AIDS. But he is an artist, and he does. He shoots a crude photograph of two pairs of feet in a bed, below a crucifix. One is meant to represent the priest, the other the abused boy. That’s just the beginning. Now a girl, handsomely endowed, takes a batch of pictures of herself wearing only panties. “High art” is how she describes her product. The curator examines her semi-naked pictures, with emphasis on her naked breasts, and deems the display to be “gorgeous.” But what the judges would later describe as “brilliant” is her special touch: setting these pictures next to a black felt-tip pen so the gallery audience could scrawl on them whatever graffiti or obscenities they inspire. One contestant is a reputed Christian. Her presentation is a weird distortion of the Last Supper, with a beardless Jesus Christ surrounded by gossipy people holding weapons. Another woman paints models with bloodied faces with the slogans “Syphilis by Prada” and “Herpes by Chanel.” There is the dreaded self-described “performance artist,” who constructs some sort of demented, dilapidated cardboard tepee, then sits in the middle of it with a plastic bag over her head, like a mental patient, fondling what looks like a bag of excrement. Serrano likes it but complains, “I don’t smell anything.” Then there are the men. The self-described gay man is fixated on the vision of a friend who once told him he was capable of “auto-fellatio” — performing oral sex on himself. (We’re told he’s become a recluse since discovering this talent, chuckle, chuckle.) Our artist paints the scene, but the judges are appalled. There is no shock value, they proclaim. “It should have been a photograph of you attempting this position,” a judge laments. One artist explains that he had his first erection while watching “The Little Mermaid,” so he decides to create a line drawing of the iconic shape of Mickey Mouse’s head filled with “misshapen genitals, b—-holes and nipples.” But it’s not shocking enough, he concludes, so he goes into the bathroom and decorates it with his own semen. This isn’t the only work of “art” with that theme. There’s the man who titles his painting “My Tranny Porno Fantasy.” He explains what he’s going to paint: “I have this vision of myself as post-coital, post-bondage, post-(ejaculation) tranny with really bad makeup, an electrical cord around my neck and a pink wig.” He worries aloud, laughing out loud, that the semen isn’t visible enough on his painted face. His colleagues are shocked — and love it. “Ryan’s piece is just … a little … yeah,” one contestant laughs nervously, approvingly. The winners are chosen and move on. Another episode of “Work of Art” is complete, a program aired on national television via your basic cable subscription by the Bravo network, owned by NBC, soon to be owned by Comcast, sponsored by the likes of Geico insurance and Crest toothpaste, and rated TV-14, meaning it is appropriate for any youngster at that age. There is no outcry because our popular culture is thoroughly rotten. There reaches a point where you have to say it: I believe in evil. Satan is laughing.

Visit link:
Bozell Column: Art in America