Tag Archives: kathryn-bigelow

Willem Dafoe Talks Fireflies in the Garden and Platoon at 25

“Usually when I hear the words ‘family drama,’ I run,” said Willem Dafoe, who nevertheless found something to savor in writer-director Dennis Lee’s Fireflies in the Garden . Little did Dafoe or his castmates Julia Roberts, Ryan Reynolds, Emily Watson, Hayden Panettiere and least of all Lee himself know that their particular family drama wouldn’t make it to American theaters only today — nearly four years after its Berlin Film Festival premiere in 2008.

More here:
Willem Dafoe Talks Fireflies in the Garden and Platoon at 25

Will Simon Cowell Bring Auto-Tune to the U.S. X-Factor?

American Idol ‘s liege lord Simon Cowell sucked the life from American Idol when he fled the judging panel to take on the single venture that could possibly net him more money per calendar year: introducing his The X-Factor franchise to America. Sounds like a great idea — at least for Cowell, who will be earning significantly more on the music revenues end of the deal — but what about all of those American television viewers who have never heard of X-Factor or its most successful export Leona Lewis and assume (rightly) that it’s just another Idol derivative? Simon just may have a nefarious plan.

See original here:
Will Simon Cowell Bring Auto-Tune to the U.S. X-Factor?

This Week on Cable: Getting Pulpy With Kathryn Bigelow

On cable this week, the past isn’t forgotten, it isn’t even past — if any of us need to be reminded what Kathryn Bigelow or Sam Raimi or Woody Allen movies used to be like…

Original post:
This Week on Cable: Getting Pulpy With Kathryn Bigelow

James Cameron on His Long-Lost Music Video and Falling in Love with Kathryn Bigelow

Last Thursday, I had a lengthy, terrific interview with James Cameron in advance of the special edition of Avatar (rereleased to theaters August 27), and all this week, Movieline will bring you pieces of that wide-ranging talk. At the end of my conversation with James Cameron, was there any way I could let him go without asking him about “Reach,” the only music video he ever directed? The deliciously surreal 1988 clip was made for Bill Paxton’s band Martini Ranch , and not only did it feature frequent Cameron collaborators like Paxton, Jenette Goldstein, and Lance Henriksen, but it starred filmmaker Kathryn Bigelow as a sexy cowboy one year before Cameron married her, three years before they divorced, and twenty-two years before Bigelow won the Best Director Oscar over Cameron for The Hurt Locker .

Read more:
James Cameron on His Long-Lost Music Video and Falling in Love with Kathryn Bigelow

‘Overheated Hysteria’: New York Times Editorial Goes All-Out to Attack Arizona Immigration Law

per·ni·cious pər-‘ni-shəs adj .: highly injurious or destructive : deadly Sounds like a pretty harsh word to describe something, right? So whatever the word pernicious is describing must be pretty bad. But leave it to The New York Times editorial board to throw this lingo around like it’s no big deal. In a July 8 over-the-top editorial , the Times ripped the Arizona anti-illegal immigration law over its constitutionality. “The Obama administration has not always been completely clear about its immigration agenda, but it was forthright Tuesday when it challenged the pernicious Arizona law that allows the police to question the immigration status of people they detain for local violations,” the editorial said. “Only the federal government can set or enforce immigration policy, the government said in its lawsuit against the state, and ‘Arizona has crossed this constitutional line.'” Video Below Fold The editorial goes on to whine that the Arizona legislation interferes with the federal government’s ability to enforce immigration law, as if everything is operating so swimmingly under the Obama administration’s direction. But a July 7 post from the Heritage Foundation’s The Foundry blog explains the unconstitutionality claim “nonsense”: First, the Justice Department claims that Arizona is unconstitutionally interfering with the federal government’s authority to set immigration policy. This claim is nonsense. Arizona is not interfering with the federal government’s immigration policy as it is set in the laws passed by Congress. Arizona is simply complementing and helping the federal government enforce its immigration laws. On the other hand, states that give illegal aliens drivers licenses and sanctuary cities like San Francisco that help illegal aliens violate immigration laws do interfere with federal law, but, as evidenced by the lack of federal lawsuits in those cases, this Administration has no interest in suing to stop that kind of interference. The Obama Administration thus appears to only be interested in stopping enforcement of federal law, not its violation. But the Times editorial suggests the Obama administration act against the Arizona government by restricting their ability to enforce the new law. “In the meantime, there are steps President Obama can take,” the editorial said. “He can deny Arizona access to federal databases of immigration status and refuse to allow the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency to cooperate with state officials in handling people detained under the law. The government should end the misguided program allowing local deputies to enforce immigration law after taking an educational course.” On the Fox Business Network’s July 8 broadcast of “Imus in the Morning,” Newsweek and National Journal contributing editor Stuart Taylor, of all people even criticized the Times for its “overheated hysteria.” ” It struck me the exact same way when I read The New York Times as usual this morning and yeah, that word [pernicious] jumped off the page at me and it is typical of The New York Times, overheated hysteria, I think ,” Taylor said. “I tend to agree the law has got problems and is troublesome and that it may be unconstitutional and I think it’s going to be a close call how the courts handle it. But it’s also, a law where you can certainly understand why the people of Arizona think it is a good idea. They’re being overrun by illegal immigrants and their hospitals are full of them. Their schools are full of them. They’re drug dealers in the house next door sometimes. And so the state decided they needed to do something about it. The federal government is not doing much about it but, there are problems with how the state’s law would operate and there are problems of what you call federal preemption that would interfere with federal immigration law. But pernicious is overkill. ”

Read more:
‘Overheated Hysteria’: New York Times Editorial Goes All-Out to Attack Arizona Immigration Law

Michael Moore’s New Job: Oscar Board Member

Deadline Hollywood Daily’s Editor-In-Chief Nikki Finke has declared a Red State Alert over the news that documentary filmmaker and Oscar-winner Michael Moore has just been elected to the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences’ Board of Governors. She writes, Hollywood-hating conservatives are going to have a field day with this (And predictably the L.A. Times’ Patrick Goldstein knee-jerks with this: You could hear the outcry in conservative quarters from a million miles away.) If for no other reason than she saves me from having to spend money on a “Variety” subscription, I love Nikki, but this conservative has no problem whatsoever with Michael Moore being elected to the Academy’s prestigious Board of Governors, because this conservative believes Michael Moore has earned it. Yes, Michael Moore is a liar, a shameless propagandist and an anti-American leftist of the highest order. But he’s also one helluva talented filmmaker and it would be wildly hypocritical for me to believe or argue that anyone should be blacklisted from AMPAS due to their political beliefs. And that’s the only reason I could possibly use to argue against this appointment. In the medium of documentary filmmaking, Michael Moore is one of the very best at what he does, no more or less accomplished than Kathryn Bigelow, who was also elected this year. No more or less accomplished than the other Governors. We Hollywood-hating conservatives are not the ones looking to hold people back based on their political beliefs. If I have an argument with AMPAS it’s not that they should blacklist Michael Moore, it’s why not elect Jerry Bruckheimer, Jon Voight, Michael Moriarty, or Robert Davi to this board? For they are also no more or less accomplished than many of the others. I’m sorry to disappoint those looking for outrage over Michael Moore’s new gig, but we’re not the blacklisters here. I despise everything Moore stands for just as much as the Left surely despises everything Jon Voight stands for. But a blacklist is a blacklist is a blacklist. Big Hollywood will fight Moore in the arena of ideas and expose him as the liar he is any day of the week, and relish it. But my frustration with his agitprop – especially the fact that he’s good at it – isn’t about to turn me into what disgusts me. Crossposted at Big Hollywood .

Here is the original post:
Michael Moore’s New Job: Oscar Board Member

Sigourney Weaver’s Sour Grapes

When a famous actress delivers an unusually candid quote to a foreign news site you’ve never heard of, it’s only fair to think that something may be lost in translation. At least, that’s the only explanation I can think of for this: “Jim [Cameron] didn’t have breasts, and I think that was the reason [he lost the Best Director Oscar],” Sigourney Weaver supposedly told Folha Online, a Brazilian news site. “He should have taken home that Oscar…In the past, Avatar would have won because they loved to hand out awards to big productions, like Ben-Hur . Today it’s fashionable to give the Oscar to a small movie that nobody saw.” [ HuffPo ]

More:
Sigourney Weaver’s Sour Grapes

Is Kathryn Bigelow a Jobsexual? [On Set Romance]

Journalist Deborah Schoeneman says out loud when much of Hollywood already suspected: Hurt Locker director Kathryn Bigelow —who was once married to director James Cameron —is dating Hurt Locker screenwriter Mark Boal . Some choose mates for congruous sex lives, politics, laughter, or bookshelves. And there’s the jobsexual: a person who either works so much, or loves so much to work that she always seems to end up dating the guy one desk over. (Oscar statuettes tend to shine a flattering light.) Bigelow worked creatively with ex-husband James Cameron, too, including one of her infrequent screen appearances in a music video he directed for an ’80s Bill Paxton band. After their marriage ended in 1991, Cameron and Bigelow would maintain a friendly enough relationship to collaborate on Strange Days in 1995. Now Bigelow’s career is intersecting with her personal life, again. [ HuffPo ]

See more here:
Is Kathryn Bigelow a Jobsexual? [On Set Romance]

Why Do People Keep Getting Plastic Surgery? [On Beauty]

This may seem like an easily answered question — people get plastic procedures hoping to look young and beautiful forever — but given a recent spate of cosmetic surgery horrorshows, we increasingly just don’t understand why anyone gets “work done.” Look at how plastic surgery is trending, right now ! Remember Heidi Montag ? She’s a character from MTV’s The Hills who used to be a person. That was many moons and several faces ago, and now Heidi looks like this: Bahhh! That’s a new highly humorous PSA about credit card regulations or something, the joke being that Heidi is now entirely made of plastic and chemical, just like the credit cards she’s saying bad things about. You know who directed this thing? Ron Howard . What an enabler! But also, why is Heidi joking about her face and not being able to smile and things like that? I mean, she actually can’t smile and things like that. And she seems to know that. So why would she get the surgeries done in the first place? In her case the reasoning is, yes, fairly obvious. Because she’s dumb and vain and on TV. But she’s also young, only twenty-three years old, and used to look like this . She wasn’t ugly at all! She had nice sorta WASPy, horsey Kennedy features. She’d have fit right in at Hyannis Port! But now… Oh now it’s all an ugly, too-smooth, melony mess. But again, she’s a vain and vapid reality star, one who is paid to be vain and vapid, and who is told by the likes of Ron Howard that if she keeps augmenting herself, we’ll keep paying attention. This is depressing, but vaguely understandable. But what I truly don’t get is how normal people, regular folks like you and your mom, could see those results and still say “Yes, sign me up!” How could they hear about Mexican singer Alejandra Guzman winding up in the hospital, severely unwell, after a botched butt injection , and want to go in themselves. Only to be shocked and horrified when something goes awry for them: Ha ha, a doctor was putting caulk in their ass. (Get it?) I know that people can be, like famous-ish Heidi, vain and dumb creatures (so blinded by vanity they are), but come on. When people found out that Olestra might cause you to poop your pants a little , they dropped that product like a hot potato. Are people really more frightened of the idea of something coming out of their butts than they are with the idea of their butts, in entirety, simply falling off? That’s disheartening. In 2010, that is very disheartening. Call me naive, but so much noise has been made lately about plastic surgery disasters — a conversation resurrected from the ’90s after a brief lull, it feels — that I’m just staggered that so many people, women especially, are subjecting themselves to the possibilities of, at best, having their faces ending up looking like mangled Laffy Taffy and, at worse, contracting fatal butt fall-offitis. Watching the Oscars on Sunday, there were some celebrities who have maybe gotten work and pulled it off — Kathryn Bigelow, at 59, can’t possibly look that good naturally, can she? — but those cases were very rare. Mostly, even in Hollywood circles that can afford the most expensive and exclusive doctors, you get Nicole Kidmans and Meg Ryans. Once-beautiful women who now look like sad, Twilight Zone wax versions of themselves . It seems better, more dignified, to admit to America that, yes, you are in fact a mortal who is affected by time, and let yourself look your age (Meryl Streep), than to strut down a red carpet with an embarrassing bulbous death mask of make-believe skin grafted onto your skull. I guess I just don’t get why, when so much evidence seems to suggest that most of this tucking and stretching and squeezing rarely ever works (the Bravo television channel does a whole series about this fact), we’re still hearing all these nightmare stories about people who willingly went under the knife. I generally like to think that we aren’t that broken of a culture. But maybe we are?

The rest is here:
Why Do People Keep Getting Plastic Surgery? [On Beauty]

Oscars 2010: Backstage buzz (Entertainment Weekly)

John Young shares press room tidbits from Mo’Nique, Sandra Bullock, Jeff Bridges, Kathryn Bigelow, more

Read more from the original source:
Oscars 2010: Backstage buzz (Entertainment Weekly)