Tag Archives: Love

M.I.A.: Don’t Believe The Hype, She’s Human After All

Everything you probably think about M.I.A. is wrong, in Bigger Than the Sound. By James Montgomery M.I.A. Photo: Chris Weeks/ WireImage “Hi, I’m Maya.” That’s how M.I.A. — scourge of The New York Times, the U.S. Department of Immigration and oppressors the world over — introduces herself, and to be honest, it sort of catches me off guard. After all, she does not appear to be clutching a copy of “The Anarchist Cookbook,” or covered in blood and gunpowder, or espousing the virtues of violent secessionism. She does not scan the skyline for black helicopters, or check the planters on the New York City rooftop where we’ve met for listening devices, or even mention the C.I.A., not even in passing. She does not strike me as particularly dangerous, paranoid, or ill-informed. Basically, she is just very tiny, with dainty fingers and windswept black hair and the kind of eyes you could drown in. She is funny and swears a lot and, seems to be, for all intents and purposes, a very nice person. Or, to put it another way, everything you probably think about M.I.A. is wrong. Your opinion of her no doubt has a whole lot to do with things you’ve read about her over the past month , or the seemingly incongruous way she lives her life, or even the causes she’s chosen to align herself with. The blame, it would seem, can be equally distributed. That’s not really the point. What is the point is that, when I met her earlier this week — on a sunny NYC roof deck with fake grass beneath our feet and a nude sunbather off in the distance — she struck me less as a firebrand, or a revolutionary, or even a figurehead for this haywire century and more as an honest-to-goodness person, a complicated one, somewhat unwittingly thrust under the spotlight but determined to make the most of her time there. Of course, she could have just been on her best behavior, what with the lashing Lynn Hirschberg gave her in the Times still so fresh in her mind, but really, it was a revelation to me, and it should be for you too. Because for years, we’ve all been quick to deify M.I.A. (or, alternately, demonize her), hanging an unending stream of cultural signifiers — both good and bad — on her tiny shoulders, mainly based on the way she looks or her lineage or what she supposedly represents. I am just as guilty of this as the next guy: In 2007, I wrote that her song “Paper Planes” was “indicative of the shrinking world we inhabit [and] the culture-mashing power of the Internet.” This probably wasn’t fair to M.I.A., even though she didn’t exactly hide her multinational roots or her father’s ties to the Tamil Tiger military group at the time. The problem was, I took the easy route. I didn’t consider her a person first and foremost, choosing instead to assign a bunch of BS terms to her and her music. And the reason I bring this up is because, after spending the first part of her career practically inviting this kind of press, M.I.A. seems to have transitioned with her new album, ///Y/. Sure, there was the brutal video for “Born Free” and some of the stuff she said in Lynn Hirschberg’s New York Times piece was still rather, uh, eyebrow-raising, but in either of those instances, M.I.A. simply seemed to be trying to raise awareness of injustices around the world. For quite possibly the first time in her career, she appears to be less concerned with battling evils than she is with simply highlighting them. It’s what people in her position — and by that I mean globally famous — do in situations like this. Because, first and foremost, they are people just like you or me. And that’s all a longwinded way of saying that ///Y/ is not just M.I.A.’s most personal album; it’s her most human too. It’s her (rather dissonant) attempt to make sense of the world around her, or, as she put it on that NYC rooftop: “This is not some weird, crazy conspiracy theory. This is mainstream media. I wish I was talking about way more underground theories, but [I’m] not. This is just me digesting what I see in the mainstream.” So, to make M.I.A. any less than human these days — or to take her at anything less than face value — is to do a disservice to her and her art. It’s taking the easy way out. I used to think that she was some multi-hyphenated vessel, some pop deity who delighted in pressing buttons and pushing the envelope. Now, after meeting her, after watching her answer questions about why folks seem to dislike her so (“It’s because I fight the ones that fight me. I stand up for myself,” she smiled. “Everyone should.”), I just see her as another human being, someone trying to figure out the world and her place in it. She is bound to make mistakes along the way. Shoot, she already has, but she’s learned from them. And she’s unafraid to make even more going forward. And sure, there are still plenty of reasons you could hate her — she is opinionated, she is contradictory (you know, what with her millionaire boyfriend and home in tawny Brentwood, California, and all), she supposedly thrives on confrontation — but they’re all wholly human flaws, the same ones we all have. And you may not agree with everything she says, but it’s important that she says them, because someone’s got to. Despite everything you’ve read about her, and in direct opposition to whatever you may think, M.I.A. is not a demon. She’s not dangerous. She seems just like the rest of us. Albeit a little shorter. Questions? Concerns? Hit me up at BTTS@MTVStaff.com . Do you have any strong opinions on M.I.A.? Let us know in the comments.

Go here to read the rest:
M.I.A.: Don’t Believe The Hype, She’s Human After All

Lady Gaga Talks About The Heartbreak That ‘Shaped’ Her Success

‘I wouldn’t have been as successful without him,’ she tells Rolling Stone of onetime love Luke. By James Montgomery Lady Gaga on the July 2010 issue of Rolling Stone Photo: Rolling Stone Lady Gaga strikes a formidable pose on the cover of the upcoming issue of Rolling Stone — wearing little more than a thong and a pair of M-16 assault rifles on her chest — but inside the magazine, she reveals that she’s just as vulnerable as you or I, fueled creatively by a former boyfriend who broke her heart years ago. In the new issue (which hits newsstands Friday), Gaga told writer Neil Strauss that she wouldn’t have become the international star she is today if she hadn’t gone through her breakup with a former flame named Luke, a heavy-metal drummer who has inspired everything she’s done since. “I wouldn’t have been as successful without him. I’ve never really loved anyone like I loved him. Or like I love him,” Gaga said. “That relationship really shaped me. It made me into a fighter.” In the piece, Strauss wrote that, after breaking up with Luke, Gaga “promised herself she would never love again and would make him rue the day he doubted her.” And, during their interview, he asked her if the love she used to direct toward men was now being channeled into her deeply loyal “little monsters.” “I wouldn’t say that my love for my fans is equated to my attention for men. But I will say that love comes in many different forms,” Gaga replied. “And I sort of resolved that if you can’t have the guy of your dreams, there are other ways to give love.” Strauss continued to press Gaga for details about her ex, but she told him, “I don’t want to talk about him … he’s too precious to talk about.” Though, she did say one last thing about Luke and her past life, before she became Lady Gaga — and how, by the sound of things, she’ll never be looking back ever again. “[It was] love. But, you know, I don’t really know much about love,” she said. “I suppose if I knew everything about love, I wouldn’t be good at making music, would I?” Does Gaga’s heartbreak come across in her music? Share your thoughts in the comments.

See the article here:
Lady Gaga Talks About The Heartbreak That ‘Shaped’ Her Success

REVIEW: Playful Alain Resnais Gets a Bit Lost in His Wild Grass

With the end of middle age within tippy-toe reach, Georges Palet (André Dussollier) has pulled into a kind of defensive crouch; he’s not going willingly, and open to distraction. Alternately resigned and bitterly combative, he is treated by his wife Suzanne (Anne Consigny) like a recently released mental patient, which might not be that far off: When we meet Georges he is being driven to thoughts of homicide by a passing woman’s visible panty line. But then the stream of consciousness can run pretty wild, and is subject to theoretical whims as brutal as they are benign. The roots of romantic feeling, as explored in Wild Grass , Alain Resnais’s jazzy ode to cinema and the love impulse in later life, are equally, spectacularly random.

View original post here:
REVIEW: Playful Alain Resnais Gets a Bit Lost in His Wild Grass

Chris Matthews Suggested Tea Parties Are Unlike Reagan — Who Moved to the Center?

It’s one thing for media liberals to suggest the Tea Party is on the fringe of the right, but when it’s another when they starting putting Ronald Reagan in the center by comparison (even as Governor of California). On The Rachel Maddow Show on Tuesday, Matthews suggested that somehow America is reliably centrist, so even Reagan moved to moderation (and there’s no mention of Obama’s left-wing surge): But the American people have sort of a gyroscope, something that always brings them back to center, where it very much — and nobody wants to hear this on the right, but we’re very much like France in that way. We`re not an ideologically proletarian country or right-wing militarist country. Generally, we listen to those voices and we never go further right than Reagan, and the minute he got into office, he moved very much to the center. As governor of California, for example, on issues like abortion rights. He moved to the center. I don’t think we are an extremist country, but these voices are frightening. And at a time of economic desperation, if you will, they’re being listened to. But the one ironic — I don’t want to call it silver lining – the one whisper of possible good coming out of this horror in the Gulf of Mexico, what is really hurting North America, the love we have for this part of the world, our own part of the world, is that maybe it convinces people that government is important. Matthews smeared the Tea Party together with every fringy right-wing cause in American history: MATTHEWS: You hear it from the tea party people. You see them with the Gadsden flag, “Don`t tread on me.” You hear it from the militia, from the birthers, from the patriot groups, the oath takers — the oath keepers. They all have one resonant statement. `The United States has been taken over by a foreign power. There’s a tyranny in Washington. It`s illegitimate. It’s led by a person who`s not an American. He may be a Muslim. He may be a Nazi.’ whatever. It’s not America. Anything goes. And by the way, when you resort to the Second Amendment to take out your government officials, can you go any further than that? I wonder. MADDOW: You know, seeing the way that you juxtaposed that historical clip that we just played with, for example, the birthers, and when you draw those connections with them all thinking there`s some foreign and illegitimate power that needs to be – that`s usurping legitimate American authority, it just reminds me that there’s a lot to the ‘Communists in the State Department’ stuff that sounds like the Kenyan in the White House stuff. Isn`t it sort of, can it be the same hot buttons for Americans, can they work? MATTHEWS: No, of course, it’s there. It’s the paranoid history of America. I always like to tell this to people who care about America, like your audience. There`s two armies that march almost side by side through American history. There’s the progressive army that led for abolition, that fought the Civil War, the good guys of the Civil War. And of course, those who really pushed for reconstruction afterwards like Thaddeus Stevens and the good guys, the radical Republicans of that day. And alongside is this other army, the know-nothings and then the Klansmen who came along later. And then, you`ve got in the 20th century – it’s the same pattern – it’s the progressives moving a step or two ahead of this reactionary army that rides right along them, sort of camp followers playing off the dispossessed, those who resent change. It’s same with sexual orientation today. There`s always going to be another group growing along saying this threatens traditional marriage. This threatens something here. Matthews talk of the centrist “gyroscope” came right after more of his optimistic preaching about how Democrats will pull out some of these congressional races: I think Charlie Crist, having been pushed out of the Republican Party in Florida basically for hugging Barack Obama – let’s face it – might well win down there. I think he will. I think Marco Rubio is going to fade as a candidate. I think Sharron Angle, with the statements coming out now about using the Second Amendment right, which is a right in the Constitution. It`s written there, as a way of taking on your government and bringing it down. I think that`s going to scare you. Nevada is not a right wing state. Nevada is kind of a purple state. I think Harry Reid is now back in the saddle. So I think Joe Sestak is going to win. I don’t think Pat Toomey is consistent with Pennsylvania sort of center right and center left history. So we`ll see. …I think Rand Paul could lose. But we’ll have to see. I don’t know. I think this is a bad year for progressives. It`s a tough economy, and you’re always blamed if you’re in power.

See the original post here:
Chris Matthews Suggested Tea Parties Are Unlike Reagan — Who Moved to the Center?

Kelis On Ex-Husband Nas: They’re Friendly ‘Sometimes’

Singer also tells PETA, ‘Leave me alone.’ By Mawuse Ziegbe Kelis Photo: Valerie Macon/ Getty Images Kelis has made headlines for her show-stopping style and genre-bending approach to music — but in recent months she’s also made headlines from her divorce from rapper Nas last year. The singer retired her crown as one of hip-hop’s most high-profile wives when she filed for divorce while still pregnant with the couple’s son. Divorces are rarely pleasant, but reports of bickering over child support put an ugly cast on the couple’s split. Kelis recently spoke with Perez Hilton about the situation. “It wasn’t really a bitter divorce,” Kelis told Hilton, but when asked if the two stars were on friendly terms, Kelis replied, “Sometimes.” The singer also denied rumors that the exes had attempted to reconcile. “No,” Kelis responded. “Not reconciled in the sense that we were, like, back together. But we’d been together for like, eight years.” Apparently Kelis has moved on with her love life and revealed that has been dating someone else. “Yeah, I am,” she replied when Hilton pressed her about dating anyone new. “For a little while,” she added, then said with a laugh, “It’s going great.” The singer said her new guy is not a musician, but was coy when asked if he’s also a famous face, saying, “Well, I guess it depends who you’re asking.” Kelis was also candid about her relationship with the animal-rights organization PETA, which has slammed the star for her love of fur. The singer famously refused to back down when PETA implored her to give up fur and she told Perez that she has no plans to trade in mink for hemp. “I’ve always worn fur and I’ve never had an issue with it,” she said. “They’d mentioned a few things to me before, I ignored it. Finally they sent me this like, nasty letter. I was just like, ‘Are you serious? Like, what?’ ” The star remained adamant about her fur stance and told PETA to back off. “Leave me alone, basically,” she said. Related Artists Kelis

Read more from the original source:
Kelis On Ex-Husband Nas: They’re Friendly ‘Sometimes’

Keith Olbermann Wins Award for ‘Excellence in Electronic Journalism’

It sure is a sign of the times when one of the most disgraceful and unashamedly liberal personalities in the television news industry wins an award for “excellence in electronic journalism.” Despite the seeming incongruity, MSNBC’s Keith Olbermann won an Edward R. Murrow award Wednesday from the Radio Television Digital News Association. So what did Olbermann win for you ask? Writing the following tribute to his mother which aired on “Countdown” shortly after her death last year (video follows with commentary): In fairness to Olbermann, it was indeed a charming segment about her love for the game of baseball, though not surprisingly self-aggrandizing like virtually everything he does on and off the air. Of particular note was a video clip he showed of an interview he did with his mother after she was hit by a ball at a game at Yankee stadium on June 17, 2000. At the time he was working for Fox Sports. Readers are encouraged to forward to minute 3:45 when Olbermann asks his mother, “Have you been surprised by all the newspaper attention?” Her response told viewers everything they needed to know about the MSNBCer’s ego, “A little bit, but I want to know why they keep mentioning you!”  Delicious. In the end, as much as I find Keith Olbermann to be a disgusting caricature of what television journalism has degraded to in the past decade, this was certainly a touching tribute to his mother who in 2009, without any warning or apparent symptoms, died two weeks after being diagnosed with terminal cancer. I can imagine the pain he must have been going through at the time, and how difficult it was to get through those seven minutes without shedding a tear. Nice job, Keith.   That said, was this the best-written piece of electronic journalism last year, or did the folks at RTDNA get swept away by the emotional tug at the heartstrings? After all, 2009 was an eventful year what with America inaugurating its first black president, Tea parties breaking out all over the country, members of Congress getting verbally abused at town hall meetings, and the economy coming back from the brink of a depression. With this in mind, was one anchorman’s on air tribute to HIS mother REALLY worthy of such a commendation?   Before you answer, consider that NBC and MSNBC won more Murrow awards this year than any other news outlet. Any questions? 

The rest is here:
Keith Olbermann Wins Award for ‘Excellence in Electronic Journalism’

Spencer Pratt: The Tweeting Rampage Returns!

Cut off by The Hills, and possibly by his wife, Spencer Pratt has been left alone with his thoughts. Fortunately, he still a Twitter account on which to share them. Without any reality show producers to worry about, the hothead returned to the social networking site after a prolonged absence, unleashing a fury of Tweets . No one is safe. While he did not directly address his separation from Heidi Montag , Spencer targeted Hills stars and strangers alike in a rant easily comprising 100+ Tweets. On Lo Bosworth: “Lo has been banging 60 year old rich guys on the side to keep up her look because she only gets paid few grand and plays star HAHA.” “I pray to see @lobosworth ugly ass out in a club now that i can do whatever i want without feeling bad for heidi! lo your [sic] f–ked! Wh-re!” Spencer Pratt has officially lost it . On Audrina Patridge, who he previously accused of getting “Tijuana plastic surgery”: “Audrina has fake everything. Damn we fakeass reality show foolios.” On Whitney Port, now the star of MTV’s The City : “No whitney port sucks and has ever since we were in high school together before all her surgeries.” On Heidi’s mom, Darlene Egelhoff: “it’s her fake mom. ask the government! darlene lied about everything she told Heidi. she stole heidi as a baby! REAL.” Wow. Spreading the love to strangers as well, Spencer targeted a particular Twitter user from England who had been writing to him, sending replies. “Glad we didn’t let you in America foreigner b–ch! USA is to [sic] smart for you fool. log off our American website and go do something foreigner.” Heidi filed for legal separation from Spencer on June 8 with photographers in tow, igniting speculation that the couple was just scheming for publicity. With Spencer absent from The Hills and real life in recent weeks, however, you have to wonder if Heidi really did up and leave the nut job for good. NOTE : Follow The Hollywood Gossip on Twitter ! We promise we won’t slander you … or at least to use proper punctuation if we’re ever forced to.

Continue reading here:
Spencer Pratt: The Tweeting Rampage Returns!

Miley Cyrus ear tattoo picture

Miley Cyrus,17-year-old also explained that the tattoo was a tribute to a late friend who passed away from cystic fibrosis. That#39;s Miley Cyrus at LAX this morning showing off her new “LOVE” inner earlobe tattoo. Miley Cyrus has been photographed with what appears to be a new tattoo. The #39;Can#39;t Be Tamed#39; singer – who is currently dating her Last Song co-star Liam Hemsworth – was recently snapped at an airport with the word #39;Love#39; inked on her right earlobe. It is reportedly

Read this article:
Miley Cyrus ear tattoo picture

Iza Olak Biography Height

Biography for Iza Olak Where: Poland Height: 178 cm Bust: 83 cm Waist: 59 cm Hips: 88 cm Iza Olak movies: Big scans: 7 Images Agencies: Modelwerk Hamburg Premier London Karin Paris Beatrice Milan Next New York

See the article here:
Iza Olak Biography Height

Vuvuzelas Can Be Eco-Friendly As Well As Noisy

Image from Vuvuzela Orchestra Vuvuzela: a word (and sound) that has gone from being local to global in 24 hours. It’s the plastic horn that produces the droning, buzzing sound in the background of the World Cup football matches. And you either love them, if you are South African, or hate them if you are the rest of the world. There have been pleas to ban them but World Cup organisers are asking fans to “please embrace our culture and the way we celebrate.” There are fears that they will become a staple of British games now as fans stuff them into their suitcases. But what to do with them … Read the full story on TreeHugger

Here is the original post:
Vuvuzelas Can Be Eco-Friendly As Well As Noisy