Tag Archives: media

Ashley Tisdale Hides her Ugly Face of the Day

If you read the site, you will know that after seeing Ashley Tisdale smiling at last year’s teen choice awards, for winning best female performer, or something equally paid off for and stupid sounding, I felt a need to prove the world that she’s not the best at anything, and put her in her ugly girl place, cuz there’s one thing I hate in the world, and that’s ugly chicks who think they are hot… So we’ve established in our “Ugly Watch” that she’s got a busted up face, despite the plastic surgery, she looks seriously inbred….I know we’ve succeeded cuz she’s covering the fuck up now, so no one can be tainted by her disgustingness and so everyone can focus on her body, something she works really hard to maintain, but despite all her efforts leaves her with a boring looking ass… I won’t be happy til Tisdale is too scared to leave her house. So the ugly watch continues….

The rest is here:
Ashley Tisdale Hides her Ugly Face of the Day

Kelly Brook is Really Popular of the Day

My big regret with this bitch is that 5 or 6 years ago, when I started the site, I didn’t reach out to her and book her for a photoshoot back when she was affordable and desperate. A photoshoot that would have lead to marriage, kids and the possible good life she’s getting now, because there was a time when this bitch wasn’t all over the media, but instead was getting fucked by celebrity cock on the downlow and 500 dollars would have got her tits in my face for the site. Unfortunately, I don’t spot talent very well, cuz I never predicted this happening. Especially not now in her old age, I was convinced she was just going to fade off like all the other attractive, busty, UK trash in cheap lingerie, but instead she pulled the right moves, got the right management, and now people talk about her every fucking day like she matters…which she doesn’t…but I guess her tits kinda do…cuz they are big…and being oppressed in this outfit like a black man in the 1950s…ok, enough of this nonsense…let’s focus on the real issues like why she is wearing the same shirt as Ashley Tisdale (scroll down)…how embarrassing.

Continue reading here:
Kelly Brook is Really Popular of the Day

Dr. Laura, Hulk Hogan, William Shatner & Soulja Boy: infoMania: 8.19.10

Host Conor Knighton and comedic crew wickedly skewer the week in media. Check out “Dr. Laura,” getting real on “Larry King,” Spike Lee ripping reality television, a dirty Scream Queen and %^&$# Shatner says. This brand new episode features Erin Gibson and her lady friends on an “Eat, Pray Love” outing, Sergio Cilli staging a Soulja Boy “Music Intervention” and a shirtless edition of Brett Erlich's “Viral Video Film School.” Plus, Conor channels Justin Bieber. infoMania is a half-hour satirical news show that airs on Current TV. The show puts a comedic spin on the 24-hour chaos and information overload brought about by the constant bombardment of the media. Hosted by Conor Knighton and co-starring Brett Erlich, Erin Gibson, Ben Hoffman, Bryan Safi and Sergio Cilli, the show airs on Thursdays at 10/9c on Current TV. added by: infoMania

Dr. Laura, Spike Lee, The Bachelor Pad & Shatner

In this roundup of the most outrageous and hilarious media moments of the week, host Conor Knighton checks out what happens when Dr. Laura faces Larry King, the Kardashians get punked by a baby, Marie Osmond is all dolled up on QVC, The Food Network gets back to bacon, and William Shatner sits down with Mary Kay Loutourneau. infoMania is a half-hour satirical news show that airs on Current TV. The show puts a comedic spin on the 24-hour chaos and information overload brought about by the constant bombardment of the media. Hosted by Conor Knighton and co-starring Brett Erlich, Erin Gibson, Ben Hoffman, Bryan Safi and Sergio Cilli, the show airs on Thursdays at 10/9c on Current TV. added by: Conor_Knighton

MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough Predicts ‘Certain Networks’ Will ‘Maul’ Haley Barbour If He Runs in 2012

The co-host of MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” Joe Scarborough, strongly believes certain networks would play the race card big time against southern Republican Haley Barbour, if he runs for President in 2012. Scarborough predicted on Thursday that if the Mississippi governor is the Republican Presidential nominee in 2012, the media would smear him as a racist white man from the South running against the first black president. He particularly stated that “certain networks” would “maul” Barbour if he runs, resulting in an awkward moment on the set. Could Scarborough possibly have meant MSNBC in that cast? When the discussion turned to a possible Barbour-Obama race in 2012, Scarborough put in his two cents. “I like [Barbour] a lot,” he said. “I just don’t like the optics of him against Barack Obama in 2012.” Scarborough invoked the media’s treatment of the Clintons in the 2008 Democratic Primary as an example. “We saw last time, Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton were accused of being racists. How will the mainstream media treat an old-time Southern governor from Mississippi who criticizes [Obama]?” Politico executive editor Jim Vandehei even sounded his agreement with Scarborough. “I think you pinpointed exactly his biggest liability,” he told Scarborough of Barbour. “Before people knew me, they assumed because I was from the South that I was a racist,” Scarborough continued. “Ask Hillary Clinton or Bill Clinton what the national media did to them because they were running against an African-American.” A transcript of the segment, which aired on August 19, at 6:25 a.m. EDT, is as follows: JOE SCARBOROUGH: I like this guy a lot. I just don’t the optics of him against Barack Obama in 2012 as a Republican strategist, the optics. TINA BROWN, editor-in-chief, The Daily Beast: What do you mean the optics? JIM VANDEHEI: executive editor, Politico: A Southern, bourbon-drinking, former tobacco lobbyist optics? SCARBOROUGH: No, seriously, from Mississippi. And let’s just get it out on the table now, because nobody else will say it. From Mississippi, running against the first African-American President. It’s going to be tough for any Republican, even from Minnesota…to run against an African-American. We saw last time, Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton were accused of being racists. Jim, how will the mainstream media treat an old-time Southern governor from Mississippi who criticizes him? VANDEHEI: I mean, I think you pinpointed exactly his biggest liability. (…) 6:28 a.m. BROWN: You say you don’t like the optics, and of course that is an enormous thing, Mississippi versus the African-American. But at the same time, if you look at the optics the other way, and say he actually comes off as a kind of grisly, hands-on, experienced – I mean he could be like the un-Barack, in that sense, you know? JOE SCARBOROUGH: I will tell you, though. I can already write the columns, that will be in the New York Times op-ed pages, and I know this, going on shows, where there’s politically correct you-name-it, where before people knew me they assumed because I was from the South that I was a racist. And again, ask Hillary Clinton, or Bill Clinton, what the national media did to them because they were running against an African-American. BROWN: But we have a different period now. I mean, I think, I think nobody wants that to be said, and I’m sure that there are ways that perhaps he could  – SCARBOROUGH: They accused Bill Clinton of being a racist. BROWN: That race was full of the kind of idealism of, you know, of the first African-American President, which it should have been. SCARBOROUGH: So let’s call Bill Clinton a racist. You get the point. If they would do that to the guy that people called “the first black president,” what will they do to a Southern governor that looks like Haley. BROWN: Yeah, it’ll be ugly. SCARBOROUGH: They will maul him, on certain networks.

Read more here:
MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough Predicts ‘Certain Networks’ Will ‘Maul’ Haley Barbour If He Runs in 2012

Is CNN Perpetuating the ‘Obama is Muslim’ Meme? Chyron: ‘W.H.: Pres. Obama Isn’t Muslim’

Every time the question about President Barack Obama’s faith is brought up, the wizards of smart in the mainstream media get up in arms about “right-wingers” or “tea partiers” perpetuating those allegations. But is it possible that by devoting so much attention to these issues of Obama’s faith and his citizenship, the media are creating the very feeding frenzy they’re appalled by? On CNN’s Aug. 19 “The Situation Room,” host Wolf Blitzer led his program off with at what first glance is a startling chyron: “W.H.: Pres. Obama Isn’t Muslim”. That graphic was in response to a recent Pew Research Center poll that found 18 percent of respondents thought Obama was Muslim. Later in the program, Blitzer went to his panel – CNN political analyst James Carville and Washington Times columnist and Heritage Foundation fellow Tony Blankley. Initially Carville said he didn’t have a clear explanation. Video with partial transcript and commentary below fold “I don’t other than the fact people are just willing to believe anything or there are a lot of stupid people out there,” Carville said. “I really don’t have an explanation, just like I don’t have an explanation for the fact that you see some of these polls that a quarter of the people believe he was born outside the country. I’m just as flummoxed as the next person.” Blankley cited an instance in 19 th Century England, which people questioned the faith of British Prime Minster Benjamin Disraeli. “I would compare it to what happened to Benjamin Disraeli, the British Prime Minister in the mid-19 th Century,” Blankley said. “He was suspected of being a Jew all through his career. His dad had been Jewish, but he baptized young Benjamin in the Church of England and he remained a practicing Christian with Jewish ancestry. I think it’s a similar situation with Obama.” And according Blankley, although he didn’t condone that belief, he suggested the same sort of circumstances were in play with the 44 th President of the United States. “His father was obviously Muslim and so that suspicious is there,” Blankley continued. “And then I think — what’s interesting is the numbers have gotten worse for him since he’s been President and I think some of his decisions, the outreach to Islam, good as it may be, wise as it may be, encourages some. His getting into a fight with the Israeli prime minister and his lack of attending church conspicuously, although Reagan, the President I worked for, didn’t go to church much because he said it would interrupt the congregation. So, there are good reasons for it, but the public is going to think what it’s going to think and he’s not made it easier.” Carville wasn’t buying it. Instead he just chalked the public up as “stupid” and willing to believe anything. He conflated the argument with questions about the President’s birth certificate. “I guess I would dispute, Tony — I don’t think the public thinks,” Carville said. “How can they think he wasn’t born in the United States, I mean with two birth announcements in both Honolulu papers. Again, I don’t have an explanation, and the quality of information to people today is exponentially higher than it was in 19 th century England. But again you’ve got to assume some people are just willing to believe anything and some people are out and out stupid. I wish I had a better explanation for it.” Despite the explanations (or lack of) from esteemed panelists, it’s possible the media themselves are to blame. By consistently using questions about Obama’s faith and his citizenship as fodder to demean conservatives, specifically the Tea Party movement and thereby creating a general mistrust by saying vile things, have the mainstream media perpetuated the very allegations they are abhorred by?

See the article here:
Is CNN Perpetuating the ‘Obama is Muslim’ Meme? Chyron: ‘W.H.: Pres. Obama Isn’t Muslim’

Newsweek ‘Thought Experiment’: Why Not Cut Alaska Loose From the Union?

Back in September 2008, MSNBC’s Chris Matthews floated a specious allegation that then-Governor Sarah Palin had ties to an advocate of Alaskan secession named Joe Vogler. Although the charge was roundly discredited, it was one of the many early attempts to smear Palin as a wacky extremist. Two years later, it appears at least one writer for a liberal magazine thinks Alaskan secession would be a fun little topic to bat around the Web. ” Thought Experiment: Should Alaska Secede From the U.S.? ” asked the headline for Daniel Stone’s August 18 The Gaggle blog post at Newsweek.com: August is slow around Washington, so we figured it’d be high time to toss around the idea of kicking Alaska out of the union—or the state leaving on its own accord. The reason? Those darn Alaskans are too conservative, too critical of federal government intrusion, yet they are net recipients of federal aid from Washington spending: A New York Times report from today points to the reason why: Alaskan politicians love to slam Washington for its over-the-top taxes, spending, and regulation of the state’s hefty reserves of natural resources. But when it comes to Washington giving back, Alaska is happy to take more money per capita than any other state. As of May, the Last Frontier, as it’s called, accepted $3,145 of stimulus funding per resident—money, mind you, that one of its senators and its sole member of Congress voted against. That’s not to say all Alaska lawmakers turn up their noses at D.C., but with one of the lowest unemployment rates in the country—7.9 percent, which is still high, but not as high as, say, Michigan at 13.1 percent—there’s an implicit question of how much Alaska needs Uncle Sam, and how much Uncle Sam needs Alaska. If the 49th state were to leave the union, the impact would be, at first, economically devastating, according to Gov. Sean Parnell. But over time, could Alaska, by taking control of its own regulation over oil and gas, open the state for new business, perhaps allowing it to boom in a way that, until now, Washington has apparently stifled? Let’s hear what you think. Open forum below.  This sudden academic interest in secession wouldn’t have anything to do with Palin Derangement Syndrome on the part of the media, would it?

Originally posted here:
Newsweek ‘Thought Experiment’: Why Not Cut Alaska Loose From the Union?

Time’s Sullivan Defends Obama’s Christianity, Attacks Conservatives for Perception by Some He’s Muslim

The number of Americans from all kinds of demographics who are unsure that President Obama is a Christian have grown since he’s been in office. For instance, “fewer than half of Democrats (46%) know Obama is a Christian, down from 55% in March 2009. Barely four-in-ten African-Americans say he’s a Christian, down from 56% last year,” an exasperated Amy Sullivan noted in an August 19 Swampland blog post at Time.com. So who’s fault is that? Conservatives, of course, the religion reporter insisted: It would also be foolish and naive to pretend that conservatives who call Obama a Muslim are doing it in a neutral way and that their intention is anything other than to raise questions about his “otherness.” Sullivan failed to name which prominent conservatives in particular she felt were responsible for moving public opinion on the president’s religious loyalties. But in her zeal to vigorously defend Obama as a follower of Christ, Sullivan concluded by asserting that the White House has to take care to “offset those perceptions [that Obama is secretly a Muslim] with a little more openness about the president’s real Christian faith.”   Perhaps Sullivan was being extremely charitable and wished to avoid rank cynicism, but not once did it occur to her that President Obama might be an agnostic who, like many Americans, nominally associates with the Christian faith because it’s a proper thing to do.   Prior to his presidency, might President Obama have attended — albeit infrequently — Trinity United Church of Christ out of a mix of a vague sense of social and familial obligation and political calculus? Sullivan leaves that possibility unexplored.   To her mind, Obama is unquestionably a Christian and that story must be put out there by the White House PR shop in order to bolster Obama’s connection with the electorate (emphasis mine): I suppose you could call the White House’s complete lack of concern about Obama’s religious image admirable. It wouldn’t be hard to imagine a crafty political adviser marching into the Oval Office and insisting: “Mr. President, I’m sorry, but we have to have you walking into a church every Sunday morning, preferably with a big Bible under your arm.” And i n a perfect world, nobody would give a hoot whether the president went to church or said grace before meals or ever uttered one word publicly about his religious beliefs. But these Pew results suggest that nearly two years after Americans elected Obama, they know less about him than they did when he was a presidential candidate still making his way onto their radar. Forget the question of what that means for 2012– it’s already a problem for a leader who wants to connect with the country. One last note on another finding I found fascinating: Of those Americans who think Obama is a Muslim, nearly one-quarter (24%) told Pew pollsters they think he talks about his faith too much. Which is impossible, of course, because Obama is not a Muslim, so he’s spent exactly zero minutes talking about being one. What the result really illustrates is how thoroughly those who oppose Obama are willing to read everything he says and does through a filter of distrust. Sixty percent of those who think Obama is a Muslim say they got that idea from the media. But interestingly, one-in-ten say they got it from Obama’s own behavior or words. They hear the Cairo speech or see the outreach to Muslim countries and assume, well of course, it’s because he’s Muslim. That doesn’t mean he shouldn’t engage in the outreach–far from it. But it does make it even more important for the White House to offset those perceptions with a little more openness about the president’s real Christian faith.

View post:
Time’s Sullivan Defends Obama’s Christianity, Attacks Conservatives for Perception by Some He’s Muslim

Al Gore calls for climate protest, and we must answer

http://blog.algore.com/2010/08/the_movement_we_need.html In a post on his blog yesterday, Al Gore called for climate protests in America in response to the betrayal by our Congress in doing its moral duty to address the climate crisis. This is no small news, (though it will be treated as such in our media) this is a clarion call to begin a social movement to reclaim our soul as a nation and our moral conscience as a species make no mistake about that. Yet already the naysayers are attacking his words saying it is impossible, insane, and won't happen, especially in a bad recession. Funny how these same people don't seem to be complaining about unnecessary wars on two fronts causing trillions in deficits during a bad recession. But I digress. But allow me to answer their claims. Firstly, this will be an arduous task. That is a given especially here in America where on the whole people do not yet equate climate justice with jobs. We need to change that. People in America on the whole also do not yet equate something happening across the world with the potential to affect their lives. We need to explain that it indeed does and show them how it is affecting them now. People due to the already overabundance of partisan political spin also think this is solely a political issue. We definitely need to debunk that. In other words, this movement must not only be about protest, but accountability, education, enlightenment, moral conscience and solutions. Though as arduous a task as that may be it is definitely not impossible. It is no more impossible than the Civil Rights Movement or the Women's Suffrage Movement which dealt with many more obstacles regarding apparatus and getting the word out. In this technological age there should be little problem in organizing such a sustained movement. All we need is the will to do it, and we must. Secondly, I truly do question those who would call standing up for our only home insane. I personally believe it is insanity to continue to plunder and destroy the biodiversity of this planet. And that is exactly what we are doing. Our species, our oceans, plantlife, crops, all suffering from the overabundance of pollutants and toxins in our water and atmosphere and the effects of a warming world. Crops worldwide ruined by floods, droughts, and wildlfires which bring soil degradation, erosion to beaches causing sea level rise, and hunger from lack of food as well as a decline in potable water sources. Glaciers worldwide melting at a rapacious pace due to warming temperatures caused by the burning of fossil fuels, deforestation, burning of carbon sinks, wasteful land management practices, black carbon(soot)and political impasse. The cost of such catastrophes if we remain on the road we are on will far exceed any such accountability placed on those causing this devastation. And the cost will not only be monetary, but it has been and will be in lives and in the quality of life. Therefore, standing up for our planet to reverse these destructive behaviors is the least insane thing we could do now as a species as we see our world hurtling towards the abyss. And lastly, it won't happen. This sounds more like wishful thinking for some than an actual fact to me, because even though there are many who fall in the above categories there are also millions in this country who do see the threat this crisis places on our ability to sustain our species in years to come. Only, they have been silent, or silenced. Silenced by big oil and coal lobbies. Silenced by a complicit media pumping out talking points and misinformation 24/7 in a desperate attempt to stay awash in profits. Silenced by a political system stained by oil and fear of change. And that is exactly why a nationwide climate justice movement is so desperately needed now. Strength in numbers, in purpose, in focus. I have lived my life from the time I was a very young girl of 12 always cognizant of my actions and how they would affect the present and the future. Always cognizant of the world I wanted my child to live in. A world of peace, prosperity, equality, and with an environment that reflected the true beauty and balance of humans. I'm not about to give up on that now. So I applaud Mr. Gore's throwing down the gauntlet and hope to see it and will participate in it. Because as arduous a task as it may be fraught with intimidation and even fears, there are some things more important than fear and this is one of them. Looking into the future taking into account the present world we live in and the world we will make if we do this as opposed to not doing it, there is no choice. And contrary to what some are saying, it wouldn't be a movement to call just for a carbon tax. This is about having a social movement that defines what we are as a species. This is about working to preserve this planet for future generations because as it stands now we are failing miserably on that score. This is about calling on politicians of all parties to do what is morally right. This is about us standing up with our collective conscience to a threat to our survival. This is about seeing the big picture. I have no illusions regarding the road ahead. However, it is a moment in history that will be shaped by what we choose to do and the future will judge us on it. I choose to stand on the side of truth and on the side of moral conscience. We cannot desert our Earth now for to do so would be a grave offense as well to those we love. This isn't just about carbon taxes or dividends; or solar panels; or green jobs; this is about who you see when you look in the mirror, and who looks up to you. Thank you Mr. Gore. I surely hope we are up to this generational challenge. added by: JanforGore

Dr. Laura Schlessinger Folds Her Radio Show; Who Will Liberal Censors Target Next?

On CNN’s Larry King Live last night, talk-radio star Dr. Laura Schlessinger announced that she’s leaving the talk-radio racket after her contract expires in December. “I want to be able to say what’s on my mind and in my heart, and what I think is helpful and useful, without somebody getting angry, some special interest group deciding this is the time to silence a voice of dissent and attack affiliates and attack sponsors.” All three TV networks jumped on the story last week that she’d used the N-word repeatedly to a caller in describing how black comedians can freely use the N-word, but others cannot. Brian Maloney at Radio Equalizer sounded the alarm that this scalp might not be the last:   In the wake of Dr Laura Schlessinger’s sudden departure from broadcasting , Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, Michael Savage, Laura Ingraham and dozens of other talkers could be next to face the axe. Sadly, the far-left parasites at Media Matters have won this battle by default as conservatives strangely chose to sit out the fight . Now, with champagne corks popping, they can celebrate as major contributions from billionaires fill their coffers…. It’s a strange sight after the liberals have been waving around the First Amendment for radical imams for days. Media Matters ripped Don Imus out of his cozy chair at MSNBC for saying the words “nappy-headed hos” on TV at 6 am. Now they’ve gotten Dr. Laura’s appointment canceled over this exchange with a black woman caller with a white husband who felt her in-laws were racially insensitive:  SCHLESSINGER: I think that’s — well, listen, without giving much thought, a lot of blacks voted for Obama simply ’cause he was half-black. Didn’t matter what he was gonna do in office, it was a black thing. You gotta know that. That’s not a surprise. Not everything that somebody says — we had friends over the other day; we got about 35 people here — the guys who were gonna start playing basketball. I was gonna go out and play basketball. My bodyguard and my dear friend is a black man. And I said, “White men can’t jump; I want you on my team.” That was racist? That was funny. CALLER: How about the N-word? So, the N-word’s been thrown around — SCHLESSINGER: Black guys use it all the time. Turn on HBO, listen to a black comic, and all you hear is nigger, nigger, nigger. CALLER: That isn’t — SCHLESSINGER: I don’t get it. If anybody without enough melanin says it, it’s a horrible thing; but when black people say it, it’s affectionate. CALLER: So it’s OK to say “nigger”? SCHLESSINGER: — and not enough sense of humor. CALLER: It’s OK to say that word? SCHLESSINGER: It depends how it’s said. CALLER: Is it OK to say that word? Is it ever OK to say that word? SCHLESSINGER: It’s — it depends how it’s said. Black guys talking to each other seem to think it’s OK. At least Imus actually insulted the Princeton women’s basketball team as “nappy-headed hos.” Schlessinger didn’t use the N-word against anyone. She discussed the social taboos around the word without applying it to anyone. (Black academics write whole books about it — with an N-word title .) You can certainly say that she didn’t need to take this detour or use the actual word if a Media Matters monitor is listening in. But it cannot be said that Dr. Laura is some sort of white supremacist who just put on a sheet. Media Matters weren’t listening to her show to expose her as a racist. They object to her social conservatism, her pro-life, pro-marriage stands, and were looking for a way to silence her. This is the second time Dr. Laura has been censored by the Left. Her TV show was killed and buried (almost before it aired ) in 2000 by gay-left censors with the website StopDrLaura.com. Media Matters was joined in their Shut Her Up campaign by the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation in a campaign to pressure advertisers — as well as by UNITY Journalists of Color , an alliance of four different minority-reporter groups: the National Association of Black Journalists, the National Association of Hispanic Journalists, the Asian American Journalists Association, and the Native American Journalists Association.  Maloney added: From here, “progressives” now have more than one way to skin a cat: they can wait for the next Gotcha Game opportunity to pounce on individual talk hosts, knowing conservatives have shown they aren’t ready for battle. The second approach toward censorship is internal: with station managers typically on the left, lineups can be slowly watered-down until all traces of right-leaning programming have gone missing. For an alarming example, just look to Tuesday’s news that the Air America radio exec who saw the lefty network through to its demise has just been hired to run WMAL / Washington, a key affiliate for Limbaugh, Hannity and Levin in the nation’s capital. Already, one influential regional broadcast industry site is calling on the programmer to remove conservatives and add failed libtalkers to the lineup. Some left-wing media watchdog groups (like Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting) have touted their “anti-censorship” stance as superior to conservatives, even when they didn’t live up to it. But Media Matters has been quite explicit in pounding Dr. Laura’s sponsors to quit her show. For months, they’ve been mocking any advertiser who spends money on the Glenn Beck show on Fox. They are clearly not an “anti-censorship” group.

Follow this link:
Dr. Laura Schlessinger Folds Her Radio Show; Who Will Liberal Censors Target Next?