Tag Archives: middle-east

NYT’s Friedman Defends CNN’s Nasr and Hezbollah Founder Fadlallah, the Alan Alda of the Middle East

Tom Friedman stepped into a journalistic controversy in his Sunday New York Times column, ” Can We Talk? ” protesting CNN’s firing of senior editor of Middle East affairs Octavia Nasr for posting this message on Twitter upon the death of Hezbollah founder Mohammed Hussein Fadlallah: Sad to hear of the passing of Sayyed Mohammed Hussein Fadlallah… One of Hezbollah’s giants I respect a lot. According to Western intelligence, Fadlallah blessed the drivers of the vehicles behind the 1983 attacks on Marine barracks in Beirut which killed 241 Marines. President Clinton froze his assets in 1995 because of his suspected involvement with terrorists. Yet Friedman was dismayed by Nasr’s dismissal by CNN: I find Nasr’s firing troubling. Yes, she made a mistake. Reporters covering a beat should not be issuing condolences for any of the actors they cover. It undermines their credibility. But we also gain a great deal by having an Arabic-speaking, Lebanese-Christian female journalist covering the Middle East for CNN, and if her only sin in 20 years is a 140-character message about a complex figure like Fadlallah , she deserved some slack. She should have been suspended for a month, but not fired. It’s wrong on several counts. Friedman’s omission of the killing of the Marines is especially odd considering he used the massacre to insult Ronald Reagan in an exchange with then-GOP presidential candidate Lamar Alexander in a March 5, 1995 appearance on CBS’s Face the Nation. Friedman downplayed Fadlallah’s hatred of Israel, never mentioning the phrase “suicide bombers” and saying only that he “had some dark side.” I’ve never met Octavia Nasr or Fadlallah. Fadlallah clearly hated Israel, supported attacks on Israelis and opposed the U.S. troops in Lebanon and Iraq. But he also opposed Hezbollah’s choking dogmatism and obedience to Iran; he wanted Lebanon’s Shiites to be independent and modern, and he built a regional following through his social commentaries. …. Of course, Fadlallah was not just a social worker. He had some dark side. People at CNN tell me Nasr knew both. But here’s what I know: The Middle East has to change in order to thrive, and that change has to come from within, from change agents who are seen as legitimate and rooted in their own cultures. They may not be America’s cup of tea. But we need to know about them, and understand where our interests converge — not just demonize them all. Dan Abrams, founder of Mediaite, responded at length to Friedman in the comments section of a related Mediaite article. ….when a journalist who covers the middle east expresses admiration for the leader of a group that is at least partially a terror organization, its not just a small matter. He may have done other amazing things including being more progressive than others of his ilk, but can you imagine what would happen to an American journalist expressing admiration for an Al Quaeda leader who had other, better, attributes? When you work at a media entity like CNN (or the New York Times) and you don’t get that words matter — all of them — then that in and of itself, should be a fireable offense. One would think, from the wailing of Friedman and Nasr’s other apologists, that Fadlallah was defined by his support of women’s rights. But the Times’s July 5 obituary for Fadlallah , which appeared before the Nasr controversy broke, devoted a single paragraph to his “comparatively progressive positions on women’s rights and family law,” while emphasizing his justification for suicide bombings and hatred for Israel. “Comparatively” is the operative word, as the opinions of this Alan Alda of the Middle East aren’t exactly bold by civilized standards: “…he argued that women had the right to defend themselves from domestic violence.” Friedman’s interest in Fadlallah’s feminism is pretty new. His only previous mention of Fadlallah, according to a Nexis search, was a single citation in the last paragraph of a 1984 news story, back when Friedman was a New York Times reporter.

More:
NYT’s Friedman Defends CNN’s Nasr and Hezbollah Founder Fadlallah, the Alan Alda of the Middle East

Poachers kill last female rhino in South African park for prized horn

PHOTO: The last rhinoceros cow in Krugersdorp park, South Africa, bled to death on Wednesday after poachers hacked off her horn. Photograph: Reuters Poachers kill last female rhino in South African park for prized horn – Record levels of poaching are endangering survival of rhinoceros in South Africa South African wildlife experts are calling for urgent action against poachers after the last female rhinoceros in a popular game reserve near Johannesburg bled to death after having its horn hacked off. Wildlife officials say poaching for the prized horns has now reached an all-time high. “Last year, 129 rhinos were killed for their horns in South Africa. This year, we have already had 136 deaths,” said Japie Mostert, chief game ranger at the 1,500-hectare Krugersdorp game reserve. The gang used tranquilliser guns and a helicopter to bring down the nine-year-old rhino cow. Her distraught calf was moved to a nearby estate where it was introduced to two other orphaned white rhinos. Wanda Mkutshulwa, a spokeswoman for South African National Parks, said investigations into the growing number of incidents had been shifted to the country's organised crime unit. “We are dealing with very focused criminals. Police need to help game reserves because they are not at all equipped to handle crime on such an organised level,'' she said. Rhino horn consists of compressed keratin fibre – similar to hair – and in many Asian cultures it is a fundamental ingredient in traditional medicines. Mkutshulwa said poaching was also rife in the Kruger Park. Five men were arrested there in the past week alone – four of whom were caught with two bloodied rhino horns, AK-47 assault rifles, bolt-action rifles and an axe. Krugersdorp game reserve attracts at least 200,000 visitors every year. It is also close to a private airport, which may have been used by the poachers. “The exercise takes them very little time,” Mostert said. “They first fly over the park in the late afternoon to locate where the rhino is grazing. Then they return at night and dart the animal from the air. The tranquilliser takes less than seven minutes to act. “They saw off the horns with a chainsaw. They do not even need to switch off the rotors of the helicopter. We do not hear anything because our houses are too far away. The animal dies either from an overdose of tranquilliser or bleeds to death.” The committee of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (Cites) warned last year that rhino poaching had reached an all-time high. The Cites conference in Geneva in July 2009 heard that Asia's economic expansion had fuelled the market in rhino horns. The horns are also used in the Middle East to make handles for ornamental daggers. Cites said demand for them had begun to soar in recent years. In the five years up to 2005, an average of only 36 rhinos had been killed each year. Conservationists estimate that there are only 18,000 black and white rhinos in Africa, down from 65,000 in the 1970s. Mostert, who has been a ranger for 20 years, said the animals fetch up to 1m rand (

Investigation Clears Israeli Commandos of Wrongdoing; AP, WaPo Focus on ‘Mistakes’

The Israeli commandos who intercepted a flotilla bound for the Gaza Strip on May 31 were cleared of wrongdoing by a military inquiry into the matter. The same panel faulted the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) for “mistakes that were made in decisions, including some taken at relatively high levels,” according to retired Israeli Major General Giora Eiland . While we at NewsBusters have taken Reuters to task before for their biased coverage of the Middle East, the news wire actually broke from the pack a bit in its portrayal of the story , focusing on the conclusion that there was no wrongdoing by the Israelis in the now infamous raid. By contrast, the Washington Post and Associated Press opened their stories focused on the negative. Below are the lede paragraphs for the respective news agencies: JERUSALEM — An internal Israeli review of the navy’s raid against a Turkish aid ship faulted planners Monday for not formulating alternative plans and concluded that the agencies involved should have shared intelligence more efficiently before the operation.  TEL AVIV, Israel — Flawed intelligence-gathering and planning led to Israel’s botched and deadly raid on a Gaza-bound protest flotilla, with security forces underestimating the potential for violence, said the official report released Monday. Reuters noted as early as the fourth paragraph of its July 12 story that the Israeli commandos were found to have discharged their weapons in self defense. A few paragraphs later it noted that: Eiland said his inquiry found evidence that activists on the Turkish-flagged Mavi Marmara opened fire on Israeli commandos. “We found that there are at least four incidents in which the people who were on the ship shot at our soldiers, either by using the weapons that were stolen from the soldiers or a weapon that they had,” he said. “We do have evidence that there was at least one weapon on this ship before we arrived and there is good reason to believe that the first shooting that occurred was when our soldier, the second soldier that arrived on the deck from the very first helicopter was shot by somebody,” he added. The Washington Post’s Janine Zacharia also made reference to Eiland’s findings about the crew and/or passengers of the Turkish ship firing on the Israeli commandos and noted that “[t]he inquiry also found that passengers had cut off banisters from the ship to use as weapons against the soldiers.” By contrast, although Ian Deitch hacked out 25 paragraphs for his story, the AP writer found no room to elaborate on the findings other than this brief reference in the second paragraph: The report, however, praised the commandos who took part in the operation, saying they were justified in opening fire and killing nine after being confronted by violent pro-Palestinian activists on board one of the ships.

See the rest here:
Investigation Clears Israeli Commandos of Wrongdoing; AP, WaPo Focus on ‘Mistakes’

Suicide Bomber in Baghdad Kills 6

Six were killed in Baghdad by a suicide bomber after he blows up a car at an army check point in. The bombing comes after three days of attacks on Shia pilgrims in Baghdad killed more than 50 people, as reported by Barbara Surk of AP. Three US soldiers were among those killed in the attack in western Baghdad’s mainly Sunni Ghazaliya district. Eleven others were killed in bomb attacks somewhere in the capital. Attacks continue on an almost daily basis even if the violence has dropped dramatically in Iraq. Our correspondent reported that 35 people died on Wednesday when a suicide bomber wearing an explosives-filled belt struck pilgrims in Adhamiya, a Sunni district across the Tigris river from Kadhimiya, in the north of the capital. Five bombings in the Iraqi capital on Thursday killed another 11 people and brought the number of wounded to more than 400 since Tuesday, officials said. This represents an overall decrease in comparison to 2008. The second half of 2009 saw a large increase in the number of injured civilians when compared to the first half. 4,068 civilians were killed and 15,935 injured in violence in 2009, according to information provided by Iraq’s Ministry of Human Rights. Suicide Bomber in Baghdad Kills 6 is a post from: Daily World Buzz Continue reading

Cal: Amanpour Thinks Like Nasr But Too Smart To Tweet It

CNN fired an editor for expressing “a lot” of “respect” for a Hezbollah leader the US had designated a terrorist.  So how has ABC dealt with someone with similar views?  By hiring her and awarding her the prestigious plum of host of This Week. So what’s the difference between Octavia Nasr and Christiane Amanpour?  According to Cal Thomas, little, when it comes to their views.  It’s just that Amanpour is too smart and sophisticated to stick her views on a Tweet. Thomas shared his insight on this weekend’s editon of Fox News Watch. JON SCOTT: A Tweet that cost a reporter her job.  Octavia Nasr was CNN’s senior Middle East editor for 20 years until this week, when learning of the death of a Hezbollah    cleric she decided to share her grief via Twitter, writing there “sad to hear of the passing of Sayyed Mohammad Hussein Fadlallah.  One of Hezbollah’s giants I respect a lot.”  A giant whom she so respected, designated a terrorist by the US Treasury Department. The Tweet immediately became a center of controversy and CNN fired Ms. Nasr. . . . . CAL THOMAS: The dirty little secret here is that she was simply expressing viewpoints that is widespread not only in the American media but much of the Euro media.  If you watch the BBC, for example, as I frequently do when I’m over there, coverage of the Middle East, it is virtually all one-sided, pro-Palestinian, anti-Israel.  Christiane Amanpour holds many of these views as well, I would daresay, but she is smart enough and sophisticated enough not to stick them on a Tweet. Jake Tapper has been drawing widespread praise and solid ratings while serving as This Week guest host.  Is ABC sure it wants to hand the reins over to someone with Amanpour’s ample baggage?

Continued here:
Cal: Amanpour Thinks Like Nasr But Too Smart To Tweet It

General who said it was ‘fun to shoot people’ takes over US Central Command

A senior US general once criticised for saying it was “fun to shoot some people” has been picked to take over US Central Command, leading the military command running the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. General James Mattis, the current head of the US Joint Forces Command and who previously led troops in Iraq and Afghanistan, had widely been tipped as the next head of Central Command. President Barack Obama must formalise the nomination, which then goes to Congress for approval. Centcom, as it is known, oversees operations in a volatile swathe of the world that covers 20 countries and stretches from Egypt across the Middle East and into south and central Asia. Robert Gates, the defence secretary, praised the four-star general as “one of the military's most innovative and iconoclastic thinkers.” Mr Gates also dismissed concerns about his 2005 comments, saying Mattis had learned his lesson http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/7880617/General-who-s… added by: CarlosBobthe3rd

Leftist AOL Contributor Attacks Pope, Equates Him With Hezbollah Leader

AOL News contributor Paul Wachter launched an inflammatory attack on Pope Benedict XVI in a Thursday post where he also defended recently-fired CNN editor Octavia Nasr for her eulogy of Hezbollah’s spiritual leader. After hinting that the network “overreacted,” Wachter suggested that CNN should also fire “anyone who speaks highly of the pope, who…has contributed to the deaths of millions from AIDS.” Wachter began his commentary, ” Octavia Nasr Firing: Should CNN Also Ax Anyone Who Praises the Pope? ,” by recounting the former Middle Eastern affairs editor’s Tweet where she expressed how she was “sad to hear of the passing of Sayyed Mohammad Hussein Fadlallah.. One of Hezbollah’s giants I respect a lot.” He then echoed Nasr’s own synopsis of the Hezbollah spiritual leader: “Fadlallah left a complex legacy. He was staunchly anti-Zionist, a defender of suicide bombings and approved of the suicide attacks on American barracks in Beirut during the United States’ ill-fated intervention in Lebanon during the country’s civil war. But he also championed women’s rights under Islam and spoke out against honor killings.” The writer, who also contributes to left-leaning publication such as New York Time Magazine, The Atlantic, and The Nation, then launched his attack on the Pope, and lumped in Jerry Fallwell for good measure at the end: An argument can be made that CNN has overreacted here , but if Nasr must go, is it too much to ask that the network at least be consistent going forward? Should it, for instance, also fire anyone who speaks highly of the pope, who covered up the clerical rape of young boys and whose anti-contraception proselytization has contributed to the deaths of millions from AIDS? Or anyone at the network who had a kind word for Jerry Fallwell, who said the United States was getting its just deserts with the 9/11 attacks and that the anti-Christ was among us, disguised as a Jewish man? So Wachter believes it’s a matter of established fact that the pontiff “covered up the clerical rape of young boys”? That’s not surprising, given the secular anti-Catholic company he keeps. As for the wild accusation that Benedict contributed to the deaths of millions from AIDS, it was CNN itself that came out on Wachter’s side last year after the Pope stated that condoms “increases the problem” of AIDS during his first trip to Africa. Correspondent Zain Verjee couldn’t seem to find any health “experts” who agreed with the Catholic leader during a March 17, 2009 report . CNN commentator Jack Cafferty condemned the pontiff’s remarks a day later , concluding that “it is past time for the Catholic Church to enter the 21st century, or at least try to drag itself out of the 13th century.” All of this came despite the fact that Dr. Edward Green of Harvard’s AIDS Prevention Research Project cited how the ” the best evidence we have supports the pope’s comments .” In any case, there’s little risk of Wachter’s hypothetical situation of a CNN employee praising the Pope happening any time soon, given the network’s slanted coverage of the priest sex abuse scandal so far during 2010 .

Read more here:
Leftist AOL Contributor Attacks Pope, Equates Him With Hezbollah Leader

LeBronomics: Could High Taxes Influence James’ Team Decision?

While sports reporters have sought agents and teammates for the inside scoop on where NBA superstar free agent LeBron James will sign, there’s another person who may know The King’s next move: his accountant. In a  July 1 blog post , the New York Post warned that “dysfunctional lawmakers in Albany” could cost the state a chance to bring the coveted athlete to New York. “If  LeBron James  goes to the Miami Heat instead of the [New York] Knicks, blame our dysfunctional lawmakers in Albany, who have saddled top-earning New Yorkers with the highest state and city income taxes in the nation, soon to be 12.85 percent on top of the IRS bite,” the Post said. The tax savings for James in Miami over New York City would be staggering, according to the Post’s analysis. “On a five-year contract worth $96 million — what he’d get from the Knicks or the Heat — LeBron would pay $12.34 million in New York taxes.” Florida has no state income tax. New Jersey and Ohio, the other reported frontrunners to attract James, also have state income taxes, but they are not as his as in New York. Based on a $96 million contract, James would pay  $5.69 million in state taxes  if he re-signed with the Cleveland Cavaliers. If he signed with the New Jersey Nets, James would pay $ 10.32 million in state taxes . The New York Post isn’t the only media outlet using “LeBronomics.” In her  July 8 EconWatch  post, CBSNews.com’s Jill Schlesinger dubbed yesterday’s market rally “The LeBron James rally.” Robert Schoenberger and Teresa Dixon Murray of the Cleveland Plain-Dealer estimated that downtown Cleveland businesses will lose $48 million  over the course of the NBA season without James. Like this article?   Sign up  for “The Balance Sheet,” BMI’s weekly e-mail newsletter.

The rest is here:
LeBronomics: Could High Taxes Influence James’ Team Decision?

AP’s Bauder: CNN’s Nasr Fired for Praising ‘Inspiration’ for ‘Hezbollah Militant Movement’

Reporting on CNN’s firing of Octavia Nasr, AP’s David Bauder buried the lede in his 7-paragraph July 8 story. Here’s Bauder’s fourth paragraph wherein he described the Lebanese cleric that Nasr had praised as “[o]ne of Hezbollah’s giants [she] respects a lot” (emphasis mine): Lebanon’s Grand Ayatollah Mohammed Hussein Fadlallah died Sunday after a long illness. He was staunchly anti-American and linked to bombings that killed more than 260 Americans , a charge he denied.  Here’s Bauder’s lead paragraph: NEW YORK — Octavia Nasr has been fired. CNN fired the editor responsible for Middle Eastern coverage after she posted a note   on Twitter expressing admiration for a late Lebanese cleric considered an inspiration for the Hezbollah militant movement.  Wouldn’t a better lede incorporate elements of the fourth paragraph? Something like: Octavia Nasr has been fired. CNN fired the editor responsible for Middle Eastern coverage after she posted a note on Twitter expressing admiration for late Lebanese cleric who has been linked to bombings that have killed more than 260 Americans. Although Hezbollah is on the U.S. State Department’s list of terrorist organizations — listed as ” Hizballah (Party of God) ” — the only place the word “terrorist” appears in Bauder’s piece is in the final paragraph and even that is in a quote by Nasr herself, apologizing for her offending tweet: She [Nasr] wrote that Fadlallah was “revered across borders yet designated a terrorist. Not the kind of life to be commenting about in a brief tweet. It’s something I deeply regret.” But [CNN senior vice president for international newsgathering Parisa] Khosravi said in a memo Wednesday that she spoke with Nasr and “we have decided that she will be leaving the company.” 

See the rest here:
AP’s Bauder: CNN’s Nasr Fired for Praising ‘Inspiration’ for ‘Hezbollah Militant Movement’

CNN and CNN.com Omits Firing of Middle East Senior Editor Nasr

Both CNN and CNN.com have punted on the firing of Octavia Nasr, the network’s senior editor of Middle East affairs, after she mourned the death of Islamist cleric Sayyed Mohammad Hussein Fadlallah, “one of Hezbollah’s giants,” to use her own phrase, on Twitter. None of CNN’s on-air programming nor the website has mentioned her “leaving the company” since the news broke on Wednesday afternoon. Mediaite’s Steve Krakauer posted an item on Nasr at 3:38 pm on Wednesday about Nasr which included the text of an internal memo from CNN International’s Senior Vice President Parisa Khosravi which, as Hot Air’s Ed Morrissey pointed out , “makes it clear that this was no resignation:” I had a conversation with Octavia this morning and I want to share with you that we have decided that she will be leaving the company. As you know, her tweet over the weekend created a wide reaction. As she has stated in her blog on CNN.com, she fully accepts that she should not have made such a simplistic comment without any context whatsoever. However, at this point, we believe that her credibility in her position as senior editor for Middle Eastern affairs has been compromised going forward. The senior editor acknowledged in the July 6 blog entry on CNN.com that her Tweet was an “error of judgment” on her part, but then continued her eulogy of the deceased Hezbollah spiritual leader: “I used the words ‘respect’ and ‘sad’ because to me as a Middle Eastern woman, Fadlallah took a contrarian and pioneering stand among Shia clerics on woman’s rights. He called for the abolition of the tribal system of ‘honor killing.’ He called the practice primitive and non-productive. He warned Muslim men that abuse of women was against Islam.” Nasr did later qualify this by stating that “this does not mean I respected him for what else he did or said. Far from it….Sayyed Fadlallah. Revered across borders yet designated a terrorist. Not the kind of life to be commenting about in a brief tweet. It’s something I deeply regret.” Other than the July 6 blog entry, a search of CNN.com turned up no stories on the controversy over the senior editor’s Tweet, nor her “leaving the company.” In fact, as of 12:40 pm Eastern on Thursday, Nasr’s bio still appears on the website.

See original here:
CNN and CNN.com Omits Firing of Middle East Senior Editor Nasr