Tag Archives: mind

Did BP and the government cover up a massive "Death Gyre" of dead sea animals in the gulf?

Firsthand accounts and leaked photos of a secret BP processing facility — possibly for dead animals — point to a massive cover-up in the Gulf. An exclusive report. ~~ June 10th was a strange day. In a surprising move, the Coast Guard instituted a dramatic expansion of the “no-fly” zone over the Gulf, preventing major media outlets like the New York Times and even scientists with top government clearance from accessing the area. This caused a wave of journalistic uproar and bewilderment on the part of researchers like Edward E. Clark of the Wildlife Center (above) who had been invited to study the impacts just prior to the media blackout (Haig Varabedian via Citizen Global). More distressing than the media blackout itself was a lingering question in my mind … what on earth could be so BAD that the U.S. government would risk losing credibility in the minds of journalists, the scientific community and the general public to ensure concealment? Was the sea floor cracking? Was a giant cloud of benzene going to wipe out the Eastern Seaboard? Had Godzilla emerged from the sea to wreak havoc upon us all? One thing was clear … we weren't getting the real story. All manner of apocalyptic scenarios were running through my head that morning when by chance I received a very strange message that pointed to a less fantastic but equally horrific explanation. It was a text message that had been sent on a borrowed phone to a man's wife, a man who had just returned from what many are now calling the “Death Gyre.” The message was e-mailed to a family friend who posted it on Facebook and it has since been recirculated. Here's the text (you will notice a few colloquialisms that are specific to Bayou talk) so read through the lines, and forgive the misspellings: I have to write this mail on a new cellphone because they have taken our phones off us. people dont know how bad this oil is.. im working in the cleanup operation and we've all has to sign a legal paper that stops us from talking to anyone. im onshore now and cant tell you where but ive just finished a very long shift in the gulf and textin this….fast as i can. the military are watching us dolphins whales, seabirds fish are all floating dead on the surface of the water.. see more.. see more…boats helicopters are scooping them away dead and dying… Whales are being exploded by the military cause they cant be carried. dead bodys as far as the eye can see air smeling of benzene ..weve seen birds fall from the sky. workers falling sick we think some workers have died. my friends are hard oilmen it was ok to at the start but now we cry. dead sea life is as big as genocide you wont imagine Since no one has yet been able to get this individual to go on record (and the Facebook post was eventually taken down) this can't be taken as hard evidence, but it does beg the question … just how many animals have died because of the worst oil spill in U.S. history? (much more at link) added by: samantha420

Why ‘Breaking Dawn, Part 2’ Is Set For Fall 2012, Not Summer

Summit, film analysts refute rumors that release date was based on ‘Eclipse’ box-office performance. By Eric Ditzian Taylor Lautner and Robert Pattinson in “Eclipse” Photo: Summit Last month, as “The Twilight Saga: Eclipse” got off to a stellar (if not record-breaking) start at the box office, MTV News squashed the widely held assumption that the second part of “Breaking Dawn” would definitely arrive in the summer of 2012. As Summit Entertainment exec Richie Fay told us, the studio was exploring multiple dates in mid- to late 2012, not just possible openings that would fall when school’s out of session. Now, Summit has officially announced that “Breaking Dawn, Part 2” will open November 2012 , and with that, another assumption seems to be taking hold among fans and on the Web: After “Eclipse” failed to wildly out-gross “New Moon” at the box office, Summit got spooked about a summer release date and fled to more familiar autumn territory. But based on our conversations with Summit and box-office analysts, that’s simply not the case. First off, it’s important to note that despite all this talk about a weaker-than-expected performance for “Eclipse,” its $289 million haul will eventually surpass the $297 million that “New Moon” pulled in last fall, according to Box Office Mojo . When you consider that sequels like “Shrek Forever After” and “Sex and the City 2” underperformed in the crowded summer-movie season, Summit has to be extremely pleased with the box-office business of “Eclipse.” So if it’s not a fear of summer that persuaded Summit to deliver both “Breaking Dawn” films in the fall, then what was it? A careful examination of the 2012 summer calendar. “The lesson is that it’s all about positioning a film at a time when it will face as little direct competition as possible,” explained Phil Contrino, editor of BoxOffice.com . “Summit was wise to stay away from summer 2012, because it’s shaping up to be a record-breaking season.” “The Avengers,” “Madagascar 3” and “Men in Black 3” are all set to drop that May, followed by “Star Trek 2” in June, and then new installments of “Spider-Man” (which already occupies the Fourth of July slot held this year by “Eclipse”), “Ice Age” and “Batman.” “Why compete with an amazing slate like that if you don’t have to?” Contrino added. “I’m sure ‘Breaking Dawn, Part 2’ would still open very well during a summer that crowded, but its audience would be devoured very quickly.” The point, then, is not that summer is a poor time to release a “Twilight” film but that fall simply presents less competition, which is not to say that there will be no box-office battle in autumn. “Breaking Dawn, Part 1” is set to open against “Happy Feet 2” on November 18, 2011, while the second in the two-part finale will compete with “Monsters Inc. 2” on November 16, 2012. But when you consider the more jam-packed summer season and the fact that an entire year will have passed between “Twilight” flicks — as opposed to the eight months between “New Moon” and “Eclipse” — the fall 2012 release date makes perfect sense. “There’s a mood and spirit to these movies that make them play really well in the fall. They’re darker, they’re more emotional than standard summer fare, and thematically, fall is a great fit,” said John Singh, a box-office analyst for Flixster . “It also allows the audience to build even greater anticipation — rather than seeing the follow-up just a few months later. This gives them a full year to anticipate the final film in a series that has generated hugely positive response from its fanbase.” How do you feel about the two “Breaking Dawn” films opening a year apart? Let us know in the comments! Check out everything we’ve got on “The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn.” For young Hollywood news, fashion and “Twilight” updates around the clock, visit HollywoodCrush.MTV.com . Related Videos ‘Twilight’ Stars Talk ‘Breaking Dawn’

Go here to see the original:
Why ‘Breaking Dawn, Part 2’ Is Set For Fall 2012, Not Summer

Ke$ha Promises No Jazz On Her New Album

‘I wouldn’t say ‘mature,’ because that sounds boring,’ Ke$ha says about the sound of her next record. By James Montgomery Ke$ha Photo: MTV News Ke$ha’s Animal album was just released in January, but that doesn’t mean she’s not already thinking ahead to her next album, even if it’s royally screwing up her sleep schedule. “I’m always writing and kind of thinking of the next step. I’m still executing this record properly onstage, but the next record is definitely on my mind, and potentially in the works soon,” she told MTV News on Monday at the Casio “Shock the World” party in New York. “I was just in Tokyo and I couldn’t sleep. I woke up at four in the morning, and I had this idea — [for] the whole video and the track and the song and who I wanted to collaborate with — so I spent like seven hours making a really horrible beat on ‘Garage Band’ and singing and rapping into my computer.” Hmmm … that doesn’t sound very country to us. Still, on her new songs, Ke$ha is looking to push the envelope a tad, which means that she’s trying to move away from her hard-partying ways. Sort of. “I write all my own music, so [the album is] going to be honest,” she said. “And I definitely am not just laying around Los Angeles getting drunk with my friends anymore, so it’ll definitely be a little different subject matter, but it will still be fun and honest. I’m not done being crazy.” And while it’s still really early in the process, Ke$ha’s got plenty of ideas floating around for her new album … and she’s already got a pretty solid sense of how the album won’t sound. “I wouldn’t say ‘mature,’ because that sounds boring, that sounds like a jazz record, and that’s not going to happen,” she laughed. “You’ll hear about different things on it. I think there’s a great pop song in anything.” Related Videos MTV News Extended Play: Ke$ha Related Artists Ke$ha

Visit link:
Ke$ha Promises No Jazz On Her New Album

Training to Swim the English Channel: The Final Countdown

Photo via EarthWatch Guest blogger Caroline Chisholm, head of marketing and communications globally for Earthwatch Institute , a non-profit organization dedicated to a sustainable environment, is swimming the English Channel in August to raise funds for Earthwatch initiatives. There is nothing like a deadline to galvanize the mind. The final hurdle before attempting my English Channel crossing was the prospect of a marathon six hour qualifying swim. This presented two major challenges. Firstly, I’ve never spent more than two and a half hours in the sea. And even that… Read the full story on TreeHugger

Read more:
Training to Swim the English Channel: The Final Countdown

Nets Which Promoted NAACP’s Attack on Tea Party Treat Sherrod as Victim; NBC First to Voter Intimidation

ABC and CBS last week jumped to advance the NAACP’s charge of racism within the Tea Party movement with friendly stories which provided corroboration for the allegation as neither identified the left-wing group’s ideology. On Tuesday night, however, the ABC and CBS evening newscasts had a sudden concern for the accuracy of the racism charge leveled against a USDA official via video posted by BigGovernment.com , a group the networks were quick to label “conservative” as they painted Shirley Sherrod as a victim of distorted editing of the video of her remarks – as if the news media never does that. Meanwhile, the NBC Nightly News, which last week managed to refrain from promoting the NAACP’s anti-Tea Party agenda, ran a full story on Sherrod and BigGovernment.com’s “lie,” but also ran the very first broadcast network story on the Justice Department’s refusal to pursue the New Black Panther Party voter intimidation case. “We turn now to a story about race, politics and what constitutes a rush to judgment,” ABC anchor Diane Sawyer intoned. (Last week: “The NAACP has just adopted a resolution this evening at its annual convention condemning quote, ‘racist behavior by Tea Party members.’”) Jake Tapper referred to “a conservative Web site posting a video clip of Department of Agriculture official Shirley Sherrod at an NAACP event talking about meeting with a white farmer…” He noted the NAACP, which had condemned Sherrod, later in the day “reversed course, saying they’d been snookered by conservative media.” On CBS, Katie Couric announced: “Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack defended his decision to fire a black official who was accused of discriminating against a white farmer. But the ousted official denies the allegation and so does a farmer.” (CBS Evening News anchor Harry Smith last week: “The Tea Party movement has come under fire from the NAACP. The accusation: the party tolerates racism in its ranks.”) On Tuesday night, CBS’s Jan Crawford cited how Sherrod’s remarks “lit up the blogosphere after a conservative Web site this week aired it and suggested there was reverse racism in the administration,” but “Sherrod then angrily answered. She told CNN she was unfairly forced out by a White House skittish about issues of race.” Crawford also noted how the NAACP blamed distorted editing for fooling them: “They said the speech was deliberately edited to create a false impression of racial bias.” On NBC, Brian Williams set up a full report on the controversy unleashed by the video clip “posted on a conservative blog” and Mark Whitaker, the NBC News Washington Bureau Chief, fretted over lies on the Internet: Mark Twain said, a century ago, that a lie can get make its way half way around the world before the truth has its shoes on. That’s just been intensified, both in term of the viral nature of these stories, but also, as we’ve seen, the potential to edit them and distort them before they get out there.  NBC also aired the first broadcast network look at the New Black Panther Party case as Brian Williams introduced a full story from Pete Williams: Another story involving race and politics. It’s been gaining traction and attention. This started with amateur video of two men standing at the entrance of a Philadelphia polling place during the last presidential election. One of them was holding a club, many of those who’ve seen the video see it as a clear case of voter intimidation at a polling place. But the Justice Department did not, they dropped the case without saying much about it. From last week: July 13 : ABC Hypes NAACP Indictment of Tea Party as Racist, a Smear the Network Stoked July 14 : CBS Uses Al Sharpton to Boost NAACP’s Accusation Tea Party is ‘Tolerating Bigotry’ The MRC’s Brad Wilmouth provided these transcripts of the stories from ABC and CBS on Tuesday night, July 20: ABC’s World News: DIANE SAWYER: And we turn now to a story about race, politics and what constitutes a rush to judgment. It involves a black federal employee, a tape posted on the Internet, and what she says was misinterpretation about statements she made decades ago. And the White House reacted. Jake Tapper reports. JAKE TAPPER: It was combustible. A conservative Web site posting a video clip of Department of Agriculture official Shirley Sherrod at an NAACP event talking about meeting with a white farmer. SHIRLEY SHERROD, FORMER USDA EMPLOYEE, IN VIDEO: I was struggling with the fact that so many black people had lost their farm land, and here I was faced with having to help a white person save their land. So I didn’t give him the full force of what I could do. TAPPER: Last night, an Obama administration official called Sherrod in her car and demanded she pull over and type a resignation letter in her Blackberry. Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said in a statement that “There is zero tolerance for discrimination” at his agency. None of them bothered to learn that the incident in question happened 24 years ago when Sherrod worked for a nonprofit. TAPPER ON PHONE TO SHERROD: The question is, why would you look at the white farmers differently than you looked at the black farmers? SHERROD: Because I always, up to that point, I felt they had all of the advantages. TAPPER: Then, in 1986, she changed her mind, as she said in the speech. SHERROD: That’s when it was revealed to me that it’s about poor versus those who have. TAPPER: In your view, your story was about how race shouldn’t matter with people. SHERROD: Right. And they turned it into saying that I’m a racist. TAPPER: And you’re not? SHERROD: You better believe it. TAPPER: And the white farmers in Sherrod’s story agree, and credit her with saving their farm. Roger and Eloise Spooner from Iron City, Georgia, consider Sherrod a friend. ROGER SPOONER, FARMER: If it hadn’t been for her, we would have, it wasn’t a matter of a few months and we would have lost it. TAPPER: And, Diane, earlier today, the NAACP was applauding Secretary Vilsack’s decision, but just a few minutes ago, they reversed course, saying they’d been snookered by conservative media, wanted Sherrod reinstated. Secretary Vilsack is standing by his decision. Diane? SAWYER: Quite a TV drama today. Thank you, Jake Tapper. CBS Evening News: KATIE COURIC: Meanwhile, in Washington today, Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack defended his decision to fire a black official who was accused of discriminating against a white farmer. But the ousted official denies the allegation and so does a farmer. Here’s our chief legal correspondent Jan Crawford. JAN CRAWFORD: It started with a speech by USDA official Shirley Sherrod describing her attitude 24 years ago toward a white farmer. SHIRLEY SHERROD, FORMER USDA OFFICIAL: And here I was faced with having to help a white person save their land. So I didn’t give him the full force of what I could do. CRAWFORD: That comment in a speech to the NAACP lit up the blogosphere after a conservative Web site this week aired it and suggested there was reverse racism in the administration. Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack reacted swiftly. He said today the USDA  had zero tolerance for discrimination and fired Sherrod for those comments. TOM VILSACK, USDA SECRETARY: When I saw the statements in the context of the statements, I determined that it would make it difficult for her to do her job as a rural development director. CRAWFORD: But, as with so many issues of race, there is a lot more to this story. Sherrod said later in the same speech she was wrong and ultimately helped the man save his farm. But that statement didn’t get out on the Internet. And when the farmer and his wife heard the charges against the woman who helped them 24 years ago, they were shocked. ROGER SPOONER, FARMER: She was just as nice as she could be to us. As far as race, I think somebody just wants to start something. CRAWFORD: Sherrod then angrily answered. She told CNN she was unfairly forced out by a White House skittish about issues of race. SHERROD, ON CNN: I had at least three calls telling me the White House wanted me to resign. CRAWFORD: Vilsack said the decision was his alone. VILSACK: So I made this decision. It’s my decision. Nobody from the White House contacted me about this at all. CRAWFORD: But in this growing controversy, this much is clear: Shirley Sherrod, now out of a job, helped Roger and Eloise Spooner. SPOONER: She saved our farm, 400 and some acres, almost 500 acres. She saved our farm. CRAWFORD: Now, while Secretary Vilsack said this issue is closed, but the cables having a field day and the blogs anything but done, the Secretary may be in for a surprise. Katie? COURIC: And, Jan, I know the NAACP initially condemned Sherrod’s remarks, but now that organization has put out a new statement. CRAWFORD: Katie, they just released a statement. They said they were snookered by these initial reports, they were completely changing course on this. They’re urging the Secretary to reconsider firing her, and they said the speech was deliberately edited to create a false impression of racial bias.

Go here to read the rest:
Nets Which Promoted NAACP’s Attack on Tea Party Treat Sherrod as Victim; NBC First to Voter Intimidation

‘Inception’ Cheat Sheet: Everything You Need To Know

MTV News has tracked every hidden layer of this film since word of it first dropped. By Eric Ditzian Leonardo Dicaprio in “Inception” Photo: Warner Bros. “Inception” is defined as a beginning — the act of commencement — but in Hollywood these days, “Inception” might just be shorthand for what happens when you make two immensely profitable movies and a studio backs up a truckload of cash onto your front lawn and says, “Thanks, man! Now go make the movie you’ve always dreamed of making.” Because that’s essentially what went down between Warner Bros. and director Christopher Nolan, who helmed “Batman Begins” and “The Dark Knight,” which grossed a combined $1.4 billion worldwide and resurrected one of the comic world’s most beloved film franchises. Nolan took his pile of cash — a rumored production budget of $200 million — and put together a film about a band of dream thieves, led by Leonardo DiCaprio, that can infiltrate another person’s sleep-time reveries and swipe coveted secrets. Their task in “Inception” is to implant an idea rather than steal one — a task so monumental they’re forced to construct dreams within dreams within dreams. What follows is nearly three hours of hallucinatory imagery, killer performances and story lines that unfold like origami to reveal hidden layers you never even thought existed. MTV News, however, has been tracking every hidden layer of this production since word of the movie first dropped. Before you hit the theater this weekend, check out our “Inception” cheat sheet for everything you need to know about what is thus far 2010’s coolest flick. Gotham Will Have to Wait In February 2009, a few weeks before Heath Ledger won a posthumous Oscar for his turn as the Joker in “The Dark Knight,” word leaked that Nolan would not immediately return to the world of the Caped Crusader for “Batman 3.” Rather, he’d be embarking on “Inception,” which was described at the time as a “contemporary sci-fi actioner set within the architecture of the mind.” Aside from that rather vague description, precious few plot details about the new movie would arise for months. Instead, we stood back as the cast came together. DiCaprio signed up in March , and in April, “Dark Knight” vet Michael Caine told us he’d be joining up as well. Joseph Gordon-Levitt , Marion Cotillard, Ellen Page, Cillian Murphy, Ken Watanabe and Tom Hardy eventually rounded out the cast. “I can’t wait to talk to you about it, but I’ve been very specifically asked not to talk about it,” Gordon-Levitt told us that June. “I want to respect [Nolan’s wishes], because I love his movies, and I’m so honored and grateful to be working with him.” “Inception” Commencement By the middle of summer, key details about plot points had begun to spring up on the Web, but we still didn’t really know what the heck this movie was about. And after the teaser trailer popped up online, well, we didn’t know a whole lot more — except that it looked freaking amazing. The cast continued to reveal almost nothing about the film during interviews. “It’s conceptual. It doesn’t fit into any genre,” Murphy told us . “There are elements of different types of things in it, but it is all from Chris’ imagination. I’ve never read anything close to it before.” Nolan’s “Inception” was shrouded in secrecy , but as 2010 rolled around, he had to begin telling the world just a little bit more about the movie. “I think it’s really a balance between creating intrigue about the movie, getting people excited to see something original, something different that they don’t know what they’re going to get,” the director explained to us in March. “We have to start giving people a little bit of information, a little bit about what ‘Inception’ is.” Then in April, he let loose in a spoiler-filled interview with the Los Angeles Times, shortly before a full trailer appeared on the Web . Welcome to Our Shared Dream As the film’s July 16 release date approached, Nolan, DiCaprio and the rest of the “Inception” crew began to make the press rounds. Murphy and Watanabe took us inside one of the film’s craziest scenes, Nolan explained how the movie builds on his “Dark Knight” experiences and DiCaprio highlighted the epically layered story line. “It’s a very rare occurrence where you can do a movie that exists on four different planes simultaneously,” DiCaprio said of the film’s various dreamscapes . “That was the immediate intrigue: delving into the world of the subconscious with Chris Nolan.” For his part, Nolan had one specific goal in mind when he decided to take a detour from Gotham City and head straight into “Inception.” “I think, for me, my whole career in making films, really every time I set out to make a film, I want to try and give somebody in the audience the experience I had watching [‘Star Wars’], where it really felt like anything was possible in that world,” he said. “That’s a really extraordinary experience to have as a moviegoer. I think that’s the highest aspiration of the Hollywood blockbuster.” Check out everything we’ve got on “Inception.” For breaking news, celebrity columns, humor and more — updated around the clock — visit MTVMoviesBlog.com . Related Videos ‘Inception’ Clips MTV Rough Cut: ‘Inception’ Related Photos Leonardo DiCaprio, Ellen Page, More Premiere ‘Inception’ In L.A.

Here is the original post:
‘Inception’ Cheat Sheet: Everything You Need To Know

‘Inception’: The Reviews Are In!

A cabal of critics isn’t lulled by the blockbuster dreamscape, with one deriding it for having ‘no soul, no sex and almost no joy.’ By Eric Ditzian Joseph Gordon-Levitt in “Inception” Photo: Warner Bros. It happened last winter with “Avatar” and it’s happening again with “Inception”: a hugely hyped, big-budget thrill-ride hits theaters, pretty much everyone loves it, yet there remain a few critics on the sideline defiantly shouting, “But it’s really not that good, people!” To those “Inception” haters, we might ask: Um, what exactly do you expect from a summer blockbuster? Because “Inception” is about as perfect as a summer blockbuster can be. Which is not to say it’s a perfect movie . No doubt, Christopher Nolan’s cinematic dreamscape has its fair share of flaws. But if you expect a ripping story line, whiz-bang special effects and the sense of being transported to another world, you will not be disappointed. In fact, you will be elated. Leonardo DiCaprio plays Dom Cobb, the brains behind a crew of thieves — including Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Ellen Page and Tom Hardy — with a peculiar specialty: They possess a machine that allows them to enter another person’s dreams and steal a secret. Their quest in “Inception” is to implant a memory, which requires them to create dreams worlds within dream worlds — and not get lost forever on the bewildering shores of their own subconscious. Will you be a fanatic or hater of “Inception”? There’s only one way to find out: Get thyself to the multiplex. And before you do, check out what the critics have to say. The Hype “The accomplishments of ‘Inception’ are mainly technical, which is faint praise only if you insist on expecting something more from commercial entertainment. That audiences do — and should — expect more is partly, I suspect, what has inspired some of the feverish early notices hailing ‘Inception’ as a masterpiece, just as the desire for a certifiably great superhero movie led to the wild overrating of ‘The Dark Knight.’ In both cases Mr. Nolan’s virtuosity as a conjurer of brilliant scenes and stunning set pieces, along with his ability to invest grandeur and novelty into conventional themes, have fostered the illusion that he is some kind of visionary.” — A.O. Scott, The New York Times The Dissenters “If you approach ‘Inception’ with lowered expectations it’s a pretty good time … For all the complexity, craftsmanship and color of ‘Inception,’ it’s yet another of [Nolan’s] ultra-serious schematic constructions with no soul, no sex and almost no joy, all about some tormented dude struggling with his ill-managed Freudian demons. That same guy sitting next to me cracked that Nolan needs to stop seeing a therapist; there’s not nearly enough sublimation in his movies.” — Andrew O’Hehir, Salon.com The Complexities “Nolan, who also wrote the screenplay, lays out the rules of his world deftly. A ton of exposition is needed, yet it never feels like exposition. Things are explained plausibly, and in just enough detail for us to get it — the last thing Nolan wants to do is over-explain himself. The information is parceled out carefully, not all at once, but not in a way that’s maddening or cryptic, either. Again, I marvel at how many films with concepts far simpler than this one never make sense at all, or else only make sense because they repeat themselves clumsily.” — Eric Snider, Cinematical.com The Performances ” ‘Inception’ benefits immensely from a series of low-key and thoroughly credible performances. DiCaprio, in a kind of riff on his ‘Shutter Island’ performance, embodies both the steel and the putty of Cobb, a man who can do remarkable things and is at the same time deeply vulnerable. Gordon-Levitt, stylish and lean as a dagger, makes a fine and steady cohort, Page is utterly at home in the intellectual depths of her character, and Hardy has a seedy nobility that suggests a John le Carr

Flashback 2008: CNN’s Roberts Declares ‘Rev. Wright-Free Zone’ During Obama Interview

In the wake of Tuesday’s revelations concerning liberal media members trying to bury the Rev. Jeremiah Wright story in the spring of 2008, one has to wonder how many mainstream organizations played a hand. On May 5 of that year, at the beginning of an interview with Democrat presidential candidate Barack Obama, CNN’s John Roberts said ( video available here courtesy Ed Driscoll, relevant section at 3:43): I want to just stipulate at the beginning of this interview, we are declaring a Reverend Wright-free zone today. So, no questions about Reverend Wright. Our viewers want us to move on, so this morning we’re going to move on. As NewsBusters noted at the time, this came eight days after CNN personalities David Gergen, Tony Harris, and Roland Martin had a discussion about why the media should stop talking about Wright (video follows with transcript and commentary): TONY HARRIS: I guess the point I would make, David, is that it seems to me that [presidential] race seems more and more — you look at the results in Pennsylvania — and it looks like more and more there are camps forming here, and that race, whether we speak of it or not, is seemingly finding its way more and more into this [presidential] race. And I was wondering if that was a moment being used — that window being used by Reverend Wright to make that point, which I thought was powerful, that different does not mean deficient. DAVID GERGEN: You know, those are important points to make — he’s not the right person to be making them on behalf of Barack Obama’s campaign. Every time he appears, he just gives legitimacy and a hunger by those who oppose Barack Obama to re-run those tapes, to keep him at the center of controversy, to let this overhang and define Barack Obama, when it has, you know — it has very, very little to do — it’s a very marginal piece of who Barack Obama is and what he stands for. And it takes attention away — we have huge, huge problems facing this country. The candidates are increasingly coming down on opposite sides. We’re having no discussion of that. Instead, we’re off on this sideshow, which is — and I think that, you know, this good preacher, I’m sure he’s a fine man, and if he had taken Bill Moyers on a walking tour of his parish, and shown people the good works that church was doing, you know, how it is helping the hungry, how it is looking after young kids, and the many other good things that church does — that would have been totally appropriate. But to be on this publicity blitz, when we have to listen to his varied views, you know, I think it’s time for him to get off the stage and frankly, for the media, I suggest, to move on. (CROSSTALK) TONY HARRIS: Go ahead, Roland. ROLAND MARTIN: You know, David, when he spoke at the National Press Club today, he actually did that. He talked about all these ministries the church is involved in. I mean, I thought his opening statement — he gave a theological, a sound opening statement. But again, the focus will not be on any of that. The focus will not be on the war, will not be on their HIV/AIDS ministry, will not be [on] any of that. It’s going to be his answer to the AIDS question, it’s going to be his answer towards — talking about Dick Cheney. That’s the problem with that. (CROSSTALK) GERGEN: If this man cares one wit about electing an African-American to the highest office in the land, he should get off the national stage. You know that. HARRIS: Point-blank. MARTIN: I know. I agree. I agree. It just — it did not help at all, and frankly, it’s going to invite more questions, and so now the question is, Reverend Wright — where does he go next? Does he continue? Does he keep talking, because absolutely, people are going to perceive… GERGEN: He should just go away, go back to the pulpit. MARTIN: Well, I tell my radio listeners that every day. HARRIS: One final question for both of you: what does Barack Obama do now in the face of this? (PAUSE) HARRIS: Wow. MARTIN: Well, I know Barack Obama does — I think what Senator Obama does — he keeps moving, he keeps focusing on his message. But also, he interates consistantly, I am running for president. I speak for myself. I am the one advocating these policies. And I am the one who is going to be sitting 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, making the decisions to affect you. That’s what he has to do. He has to make it clear it is not about anyone else out there but me, Barack Obama. HARRIS: David? GERGEN: I also think that Barack Obama would serve himself well if he sat down now for additional interviews with the press that start off pushing off and away from this. He handled himself well on Fox yesterday with Chris Wallace. I think that if he now — in Indiana and North Carolina — were to buy an hour’s worth of time in each media market and sit down in a round-table discussion with the voters from that area, with working people and talk about his hopes and plans, and let them fire away questions for what he’s going to do. And let them just get a chance to know what’s on his mind and what his priorities are, as opposed to this sideshow. HARRIS: Yeah. GERGEN: He needs to have a direct conversation with voters now, not a speech — we all know how marvelous he is in those speeches — but a direct converstation about what his hopes and dreams are, to transform this country, and he needs to that very directly with voters, with working people. HARRIS: David Gergen, thank you. Roland Martin, thank you. Boy, we needed this this morning, just a better handle to put it in a little bit better context. Thank you both. GERGEN: Thank you. MARTIN: Thank you. With what was now reported by the Daily Caller concerning folks on the left-wing JournoList actively trying to squelch all media references to Wright, one has to seriously wonder just how many news outlets participated in this disgusting cover-up. Stay tuned. 

More here:
Flashback 2008: CNN’s Roberts Declares ‘Rev. Wright-Free Zone’ During Obama Interview

Electric Cars Won’t Bring the Power Grid Down!

Photo: Michael Graham Richard It’s All About Timing I’ve said it many times before , and I still haven’t seen evidence to make me change my mind: The transition to

See original here:
Electric Cars Won’t Bring the Power Grid Down!

Pusha T Won’t Confirm Or Deny Signing To Kanye’s G.O.O.D. Music

Clipse member’s The Fear of God, mixtape happens to be coming out the same day as the rest of ‘Ye’s roster. By Shaheem Reid Pusha T Photo: MTV News We’ve heard G.O.O.D. Music camp members Consequence, Kid Cudi and Big Sean talk about their family’s grand scheme of making September 14 “G.O.O.D. Music Day.” Kanye West and his three signees are all supposed to drop albums that day. But will there be another name added to the fold? The Clipse’s Pusha T is putting out his first solo mixtape, The Fear of God, that day as well, raising speculation that he’s doing it be as part of the Louis Vuitton Don’s roster? “That’s just a good day,” Pusha told MTV News Thursday night in New York at an EA Sports event to promote the game “Need for Speed: Hot Pursuit.” “A great day for music, but it’s a ‘good’ day,” he said, slyly repeating the word. “I mean, you know. I been to Hawaii. Hawaii is a nice place. Good music is made down there, ya know. So, yeah, I was there. I can’t say too much about that. I think everybody’s gonna be in for a big surprise. A very big surprise.” Hawaii, of course, has been the primary location where Kanye has been making albums for the past several months with his roster of artists. When Pusha was asked straight up if he is signing to West, he answered with a grin, “Who’s to say, man? But the Pusha T solo album is definitely coming out.” His LP won’t be out until February at the earliest. Right now, the focus is on The Fear of God. The VA native is recording both projects simultaneously however. “I just feel like, you know, everybody’s waiting on it,” Pusha said about going solo. “I think it’s time to expand the Re-Up Gang brand. The only way to do that is expand the music. Make the music more diverse. They been seeing the Clipse for a little while. We got our own different perspectives. Myself and Malice. It’s good. It’s good for us to do this and show the world just how our minds work.” Asked to explain why the mixtape is called The Fear of God, he replied, “I feel like a lot of MCs are scared of it. A lot of MCs are scared of a solo project from an MC such as myself. I believe that. I was writing and I felt like, ‘Woooo. I’m gonna invoke the fear of God in these people.’ ” Push already put out two freestyles in the last few days, “Dearly Beloved” and “Bidding War.” “If you haven’t heard it, it’s called ‘Bidding War,’ ” he explained of the latter, where he raps over the beat of Jay Electronica’s “The Ghost of Christopher Wallace.” “Just a day. A day in the studio. It’s a lot going on in my mind right now. The music is flowing, the rhymes is flowing, and you’re gonna keep hearing from me. I’m feeling like a rapper right now. … I haven’t felt like that in a long time I my career. I’m feeling like that. That’s where I am. Let’s go play.” Do you think Pusha T fits in with the G.O.O.D. Music roster? Talk about it in the comments. Related Artists Pusha T Clipse

Read more:
Pusha T Won’t Confirm Or Deny Signing To Kanye’s G.O.O.D. Music