Tag Archives: msnbc

Ed Schultz: Palin is Racist for Criticizing the Obamas’ Connection to Rev. Wright

After spending much of his week accusing Rush Limbaugh of racism, Ed Schultz on Friday made the same absurd claim about former Alaska governor Sarah Palin. Following in the footsteps of others on his network as well as the liberal blogosphere, the MSNBCer said it was racist for Palin to refer to comments Michelle Obama made in 2008 about never having been proud of her country before her husband started winning primaries. It was also racist of Palin to mention in her book the Obamas' connection to Rev. Jeremiah Wright (video follows with transcript and commentary): read more

Read more here:
Ed Schultz: Palin is Racist for Criticizing the Obamas’ Connection to Rev. Wright

MSNBC Suspends Joe Scarborough over Political Donations [Media]

MSNBC, just to put itself on the record as “consistent,” has suspended Morning Joe co-host Joe Scarborough for the same reason it suspended Keith Olbermann : Political donations without advance approval. Interestingly, Politico, where Scarborough writes a column, instigated the suspension. More

Joe Scarborough Likes Pelosi’s Feisty Response to His MSNBC Colleague, Mimics Her Punching Him

Joe Scarborough apparently likes Nancy Pelosi's toughness, given her response to his MSNBC colleague pressing her as to why she would make a good House Minority Leader after losing 60 seats. MSNBC's Luke Russert asked the Speaker why she should lead the House Democrats if her approval rating among independents is at 8 percent. Pelosi delivered a testy response, and Scarborough admitted his glee over the tone. “I think she's a disaster for the Democrats politically right now…but I like that fight,” he remarked. “C'mon, boom!” he expressed as he threw imaginary punches, pretending to be Pelosi punching down Russert. “Hey Luke, come here, Luke, look, boom! Luke, look, look, boom!” Later on Thursday's “Morning Joe,” Scarborough was pressed by Times columnist Andrew Ross Sorkin as to why he was praising such a polarizing figure when he has promoted a platform of bipartisanship and moderate politics. The “Morning Joe” co-host has conducted multiple campaigns on his own show for calmer rhetoric in the country's political sphere and has denounced political extremism.

Olbermann Responds to Koppel, Claims Criticized Obama More in a Week that FNC Did Bush in 8 Years

Schultz Sorry About Christie Cracks? Says OK To Call Him ‘Fat Slob,’ Too

Ed Schultz: secret NewsBusters fan? You have to wonder.  This column has twice— here and here —taken the un-svelte Schultz to task for his hypocrisy in making repeated fat jokes at the expense of Chris Christie, culminating in calling the NJ guv a “fat slob.”  On his MSNBC show this evening, an apparently contrite Ed admitted that he too was fat and would understand if others also considered him a “fat slob.” I began to suspect something was afoot early in the show. On the one hand, Schultz launched into yet another long diatribe against Christie.  After taking numerous solo shots at the NJ guv, Schultz brought in a NJ teacher of the year, who was happy to be described as “strongly against Gov. Christie.” The pair proceeded to rake Christie over the coals, paying scant attention to the brutal budgetary problems facing the Garden State that have forced Christie to make reforms. But—in stark contrast with previous shows—the fat jokes had demonstrably disappeared.  And sure enough, in the tease for a subsequent segment, Schultz said “I admit that I’m fat.”  Then came this show-closer . .  . ED SCHULTZ: Before I say “that’s the Ed Show, I’m Ed Schultz” I want to say this: there was a time in my life when I was 263 pounds but I’ve really worked at it and I’m down now to 247. But I want all of you to know that I’m not only fat, I have red hair. And growing up they really picked on red heads where I came from, and I’m not offended by any of you who think I’m a fat slob.

Excerpt from:
Schultz Sorry About Christie Cracks? Says OK To Call Him ‘Fat Slob,’ Too

Rep. Weiner’s Anti-Goldline/Beckophobia Crusade Falls Flat

An organization once headed by former Obama administration official Van Jones tried it. Other so-called grassroots organizations have given it a shot. Now Rep. Anthony Weiner, D-N.Y., with the power of Congress in tow, has taken his best shot to shut Glenn Beck down. But so far it isn’t really working. On Sept. 23, Weiner called a representative from Santa Monica, Calif.-based Goldline to testify before the Commerce, Trade and Consumer Protection Subcommittee about what he deemed to be the firm’s unfair business practices. However, it just so happens that Goldline sponsors Beck and other conservative media personalities. With congressional hearings, you’d expect the media to be all over this, right? Not exactly, at least thus far. The most attention Weiner’s charade could muster was a segment at the end of MSNBC’s bomb-thrower show, “Countdown with Keith Olbermann.” Olbermann asked Weiner on his Sept. 23 broadcast if Goldline was in cahoots with “willing partners like Glenn Beck,” since anyone who suggests gold be a part of someone’s portfolio is up to no good. “The scare, lie, rip-off cycle that you outlined in your opening remarks – is it any wonder that Goldline seeks and finds willing partners in people like Glenn Beck?” Olbermann asked. According to a spokesman from Goldline, out of the 30 to 40 television advertisements the company runs on a daily basis, only one runs during Glenn Beck’s Fox News Channel programming. In fact, Goldline runs regular advertising on CNBC, the sister network to Olbermann’s MSNBC. But Weiner faulted Beck and others, including “angry radio hosts” for suggesting gold should be a part of someone’s financial portfolio. “You know this is where the angry radio host works hand-in-glove with these sellers,” Weiner said. “You know, you see Glenn Beck say, be careful, the economy’s a mess. Deficits, debts, you better invest in gold. Now let’s go to a word from our sponsor.” But Goldline offers a product that even media financial experts advise people to have in their portfolio. Take CNBC’s Jim Cramer, who on his May 17 program explained why gold is important, not necessarily as an investment to make money, but as a hedge against inflation – a point Weiner refuses to concede. “First off, gold hedges you against the eve-of-destruction pessimists,” Cramer said. “It’s a safe haven that tends to go up when everything else goes down. Second, as the commercial says, ‘Central banks are printing money like mad.’ That’s a great reason to own gold. Third no, matter what happens in keeping with the pessimistic zeitgeist, people are going to say what central banks around world are doing is inflationary. Doesn’t matter that it’s done to counter deflation – gold’s the antidote to the chatter. Fourth, there’s not a lot of gold being found.” Nonetheless, Weiner took a few more shots at Beck, which has been a pattern for the New York congressman on the gold issue . He argued that Beck was abusing the public’s trust, even though Beck was conveying a perfectly legitimate view and speaking on the behalf of a legitimate sponsor. “It got so bad that even Fox News said to Glenn Beck, you can’t be a paid sponsor for these guys anymore, because it was just — the line was getting blurred,” Weiner continued. “Now, that’s Fox News’ problem. That’s Glenn Beck’s problem. I think he does have some responsibility to his viewers. You know, it’s odd of me to be saying this, but I want to stand up for Glenn Beck’s viewers in this case.” And Weiner maintained that the laws he is proposing, which are motivating his witch-hunt, wouldn’t even be applicable to Fox News or Beck. “But the laws that we’re proposing obviously don’t impact Fox News,” he continued. “And Glenn Beck can say and do whatever he wants. But I would hope he takes a step back and looks at our study and looks at the testimony today, and realize that his viewers are middle class people who are struggling. He should not be aiding and abetting a rip off.” That begs the question – why is Weiner bringing up Beck in the first place?

Read more:
Rep. Weiner’s Anti-Goldline/Beckophobia Crusade Falls Flat

CBS Affiliate: ‘Cuomo Caught Lying About Voting for Bloomberg?’

Flying Pigs Alert! The gubernatorial campaign of Andrew Cuomo has such a poor credibility problem that even the local New York City CBS affiliate is asking: “Cuomo Caught Lying About Voting for Bloomberg?” And what caused such an aspersion to be cast upon Cuomo’s veracity? Check out this video in which Cuomo asserted that he voted for New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg. However, as the CBS affiliate pointed out , it didn’t happen: But for all his actions as the state’s chief law enforcement officer, Cuomo did have a little problem with telling the truth about his election box support for Mayor Bloomberg. “Have I voted for the mayor? Yes,” Cuomo said. Actually, he didn’t. The Cuomo campaign had to issue a clarification, saying he was only registered to vote in New York City in 2005 when he endorsed Democrat Fernando Ferrer. And this problem with the truth (lying) is yet another problem that Cuomo is now facing. Suddenly his race with conservative Republican Carl Paladino has become much closer as this same CBS affiliate has reported: There has been a dramatic development in the race for New York governor. A new poll has Republican Carl Paladino within striking distance of Democrat Andrew Cuomo as voters say they want to elect someone who will stop the circus in Albany. Wednesday was supposed to be Cuomo’s day as he picked up the endorsement of New York City’s notoriously independent mayor, Michael Bloomberg, in the race for governor. But a new poll changed that because it turned Cuomo’s once comfortable front-runner status on its head. … Only six points separate Cuomo and Paladino in the Quinnipiac University poll. Cuomo now leads 49-43, with a plus or minus error of 3.6. The poll was certainly a stunner for Team Paladino. At the last minute he bailed out of a press conference to take calls from new donors. “Suddenly his phone lit up with offers of financial resources. We cancelled his schedule and he’s in Buffalo returning telephone calls and having meetings so that we are able to take advantage of this rainstorm,” Paladino spokesman Michael Caputo said. So why would normally liberal CBS refer to Cuomo as “lying?” The theory of your humble correspondent is that Andrew Cuomo’s personality is so odiously thuggish that even people and groups that would usually support a liberal are turned off by him.

See original here:
CBS Affiliate: ‘Cuomo Caught Lying About Voting for Bloomberg?’

Matthews-Mitchell Admit: Military Doesn’t Trust Obama’s Political Advisers

Of all the revelations in Bob Woodwards’s new book , this could be the most devastating . . . On this evening’s Hardball, Chris Matthews and Andrea Mitchell admited that the military people in the Obama administration don’t trust Pres. Obama’s political advisers. That raises grave concerns for America’s security.  In purely political terms, consider the implications given that among Americans, by far the most trusted institution is . . . the military. View video here . ANDREA MITCHELL: This is a new president who had no relationship with the military. And what does come through loud and clear from this book is the distrust and the long knives that were out between the civilian side, the political aides, the former campaign aides, and the military brass . . . National Security Adviser Jim Jones is very clear that he feels ostracized, that he didn’t have access to the president on the president’s first European trip. He had to go to the president and complain. CHRIS MATTHEWS: Well is it true they don’t like each other?  Just bottom line here: is it true the military guys don’t trust the White House political people and the other way around?  Your thoughts first, Andrea, on that one. MITCHELL: I think that is true.  And I think in particular that Jim Jones, a Marine general, retired Marine general, feels very much at odds with some of the civilians on the national security team and is about to leave. I think that’s the next big announcement we’re going to have from the White House, is the shake-up on the foreign policy/national security team that mirrors what’s happened so far on the economic team.

See original here:
Matthews-Mitchell Admit: Military Doesn’t Trust Obama’s Political Advisers

Joe Scarborough Rips Liberal MSNBC Colleagues Schultz and Olbermann On-Air

Does he want to lose his job at MSNBC the way Donny Deutsch did ? Joe Scarborough seems to have a devil-may-care attitude towards criticizing his outspoken colleagues, liberal blowhards Ed Schultz and Keith Olbermann. Simply refer to past episodes here , here , here and here . While not mentioning them by name on today’s “Morning Joe,” Scarborough featured outlandish barbs from his colleagues Schultz and Olbermann as examples of what not to do in trying to “keep calm and carry on,” as the show was trying to preach to its viewers. For the second straight day, MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” ran a segment titled “Keep Calm and Carry On” – Scarborough’s favored slogan of late, he even features in his profile picture on his Twitter account – dedicated to throwing water on the political fire created by the fringe Left and Right and promoting more calm, moderate, bipartisan candidates and positions. Tuesday’s segment featured a game show format where Joe and co-host Mika Brzezinski asked questions with obvious answers – for instance, does such-and-such rabid quotation by such-and-such talk show blowhard merit the label “Keep Calm and Carry On?” Scarborough’s second question began thus: “If you’re a liberal radio and TV talk show host, and your goal is to keep calm and carry on, do you say of a Republican politician who’s just had a life-threatening heart attack, quote, ‘We ought to rip his heart out, and kick it around, and stuff it back in his chest’?” That question referred to Ed Schultz’s nasty rant from this past February, where he derided conservatives for complaining that Dick Cheney’s recovery from his heart attack was being used as a political football for health care. “You’re damn right Dick Cheney’s heart is a political football,” Schultz ranted. “We ought to rip it out and kick it around and stuff it back in him. I’m glad he didn’t tip over. He is the new poster child for health care in this country.” Two questions later, Scarborough again used an MSNBC colleague’s words as an example of hate-speech. “If you’re a liberal cable host, and you want to keep calm and carry on, do you accuse the President of the United States, who happens to be a Republican, of being a fascist, and a liar, who urinates on the Constitution?” he asked columnist Mike Barnacle. That question referred back to Olbermann’s August, 2008 smear of President Bush’s administration as “urinating on the Constitution.” It seems quite fascinating that out of all the hate speech from liberal talk show hosts on radio and television, Scarborough chose to feature barbs from two of his colleagues. Then again, MSNBC isn’t exactly a harbor of calm and collected debate. A partial transcript of the segment, which aired on September 21 at 6:43 a.m. EDT, is as follows: JOE SCARBOROUGH: Calling out the “Professional Left” and the far-Right, a campaign of ours to kind of calm everybody down, because we find – and we found out in New Hampshire this past weekend, we’ve seen it everywhere from Maine down to South Alabama, to Florida, to Alabama, to West – Americans are tired of all the screaming and shouting, so we’re trying to encourage sort of the chattering classes – to keep calm, and carry on. A noble gesture, is it not? JON MEACHAM: Absolutely. I would expect nothing less. (…) SCARBOROUGH: Question: If you’re a liberal radio and TV talk show host, and your goal is to keep calm and carry on, do you say of a Republican politician who’s just had a life-threatening heart attack, quote, “We ought to rip his heart out, and kick it around, and stuff it back in his chest.” MIKA BRZEZINSKI: That’s a no-brainer, Willie. WILLIE GEIST: Life-threatening, or did it cost him his life? SCARBOROUGH: Life-threatening. He’s still alive – these guys aren’t very good at this. BRZEZINSKI: It’s a new game. GEIST: Yes. SCARBOROUGH: No. GEIST: You said “threatening.” SCARBOROUGH: “Life-threatening.” No, I’m sorry. (…) SCARBOROUGH: Question: For the t-shirt. If you’re a liberal cable host, and you want to keep calm and carry on, do you accuse the President of the United States, who happens to be a Republican, of being a fascist, and a liar, who urinates on the Constitution? Now Mike, I would suggest that “urinates on the Constitution,” as well as “liar” and “fascist,” would be a clue for you. MIKE BARNACLE: It is, it is, and I don’t need a lifeline for this one. Yes. (Pause) C’mon, give me the t-shirt. That was the right answer, wasn’t it? It happens all the time! SCARBOROUGH: It does happen all the time. We have, actually, some re-educating to do. BRZEZINSKI: We do.

See the original post:
Joe Scarborough Rips Liberal MSNBC Colleagues Schultz and Olbermann On-Air

‘Morning Joe’ Actively Pushing Moderate Candidates?

MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” has recently delivered some strange messages of bipartisanship and moderation to its viewers. These included lecturing would-be Koran-burner Florida pastor Terry Jones on loving one’s neighbor before cutting him off without opportunity to answer, and showcasing a “Bipartisan Health Challenge” – a group of politicians and journalists walking three kilometers around the National Mall to promote fitness and bipartisanship. The MSNBC morning show featured a slightly odd segment Monday – which Newsbusters’ Mark Finkelstein first reported on – echoing New York City Mayor Bloomberg’s efforts to support moderate political candidates and combat angry political messages from fringe candidates. The “Morning Joe” crew seemed to fully endorse Mayor Bloomberg’s message,attacking “political extremists who are dominating the airwaves.” Of course, the extremists the brew crew has in mind are conservatives such as former House Speaker Newt Gingrich who compared putting a mosque near Ground Zero with a Nazi sign displayed near a Holocaust memorial. “You know, according to the Times, Bloomberg’s going to be helping candidates who aren’t bound by rigid ideology, and that’s the message we’ve been trying to emphasize here,” co-host Joe Scarborough stated. So what kind of candidates is the show actively endorsing? Are they simply endorsing conservatives and liberals who are trying to work with each other, or are they endorsing more centrist and moderate candidates? Among the candidates Mayor Bloomberg is extending a hand to are Sen. Harry Reid (D), former RINO senator and current independent Rhode Island Gubernatorial candidate Lincoln Chafee, and California gubernatorial candidate Meg Wittman. These aren’t exactly the specter of conservatism or liberalism, aside from Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. Later, Scarborough continued to make an active push for a certain type of candidate. “Now we’re going to continue like we’ve done for three years – to encourage viewers and guests to resist the pull of those people on the far Right and the “Professional Left” who seek division.” To be fair, Scarborough has expressed his approval in the past for conservative stars Gov. Haley Barbour of Mississippi and Gov. Chris Christie of New Jersey, and he is a self-described old-style conservative. He may not have been advocating centrist candidates as much as conservatives and liberals who promise to reach across the aisle. Even so, Scarborough and company’s message seems fuzzy as to who and what exactly they’re endorsing – and why they were taking time to endorse them in the first place. A transcript of the segment, which aired on September 20 at 6:37 a.m. EDT, is as follows: MIKA BRZEZINSKI: Welcome back to “Morning Joe.” New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg making news over the weekend with his extensive interview with the New York Times. The front page interview raises new speculation about his possible Presidential ambitions. JOE SCARBOROUGH: You think he’s going to run? BRZEZINSKI: I’m thinking. In the interview, Bloomberg confirms he is trying to pull politics back to the middle by helping candidates across the country – Republicans, Democrats, and Independents – fend off the Tea Party. The candidates include Meg Wittman, the Republican running for Governor of California, and Lincoln Chafee, a Republican-turned-Independent, running for Governor of Rhode Island. He also plans to host a fundraiser in Manhattan for Democrat Harry Reid, the Senate Majority Leader facing Tea Party candidate Sharron Angle, who’s being backed by Sarah Palin. Now in the interview, the mayor says this, Joe. “Look, people are angry. … Their anger is understandable. Washington isn’t working. … Anger, however, is not a government strategy .. .It’s not a way to govern.” And that, of course Joe, has been the theme of this show for three years. SCARBOROUGH: I love that line, “Anger is not a government strategy.” And the mayor’s right. He really is. You know, according to the Times, Bloomberg’s going to be helping candidates who aren’t bound by rigid ideology, and that’s the message we’ve been trying to emphasize here, and also in my book – I mean, we’ve been doing it every day on “Morning Joe.” And what we try to do is encourage politicians and thought-leaders, and every American to follow the advice of an old British war poster that carried a very simple message: “Keep calm and carry on.” And, you know, that was a message, Mika, that FDR delivered to a battered nation in the depths of the Great Depression, when, you know, he declared to all Americans that all we have to fear is fear itself. It’s also the message that Bobby Kennedy delivered to a shocked nation on the night that Martin Luther King was assassinated. And I really do believe that’s the message Americans need to hear again today. Because today our nation is confronting a new war. And it’s a war of words. We’ve forgotten how to talk to each other. You’ve got political extremists who are dominating the airwaves and dominating the national debate. And you know, what the White House calls the “Professional Left,” as well as what we call the “Far Right,” now profit from division and hate speech but makes our political system weaker. And yet, isn’t it strange that Washington politicians seem to obsess on those angry voices on the “Professional Left” and the “Far Right,” instead of seeking out voices of people like you, rational Americans who show respect to their neighbors, who raise their families, who go to work, and who play by the rules. It’s time for you, you quiet Americans, to respond, and not with angry words or hateful commentaries, or setting your hair on fire, calling a Republican President a “fascist” or a Democratic President a “fascist.” But rather, to respond with reasonable voices in a rational debate. Now we’re going to continue like we’ve done for three years – to encourage viewers and guests to resist the pull of those people on the far Right and the “Professional Left” who seek division – we’re going to say resist that, and instead let’s keep focusing on the task at hand, ensuring that America’s greatest days lie ahead. BRZEZINSKI: And what we do here, and what we’ll continue to do is we’ll call out those who preach hate, and we’ll continue to celebrate civility and promote open debate for all voices. Voices on all sides are welcome. And as Joe and I try to show you every day – I think we do a pretty good job, except when you interrupt me – SCARBOROUGH: Except when you hit me – BRZEZINSKI: Well, there’s that – that you can disagree without being disagreeable. SCARBOROUGH: Yeah, and Mika, the mayor is right. Now more than ever Americans need to work together, they need to keep calm, and they need to carry on. I like the mayor’s message. Anger is not a governing message, and it’s not a governing message when Republicans are in power, it’s not a governing message when Democrats are in power. We need to keep it together. (…) 7:03 a.m. EDT JOE SCARBOROUGH: (On Newt Gingrich) I’ve said it before, Mika, I’ll say it again. He’s selling books. And unfortunately, as we said last hour – whether it’s the “Professional Left,” or in this case the “Professional Right,” people make extreme statements that may drive up ratings, may sell books, but they hurt America. They hurt America, they coarsen the debate, and hopefully we can move beyond that. (…) 7:45 a.m. EDT SCARBOROUGH: We’ve been talking for some time on this show – if you’ve seen it, you know – we constantly are calling out extreme voices on the Right, and extreme voices on the Left, and one of the reasons is because it makes people’s jobs so much harder in the Senate.

See the original post here:
‘Morning Joe’ Actively Pushing Moderate Candidates?