Tag Archives: New Movie

REVIEW: Despite Renner Power, Bourne Legacy Is A Slog Of A Sequel

The Bourne Legacy is a passable movie that has the peculiar misfortune of being part of a very successful, influential and distinctive franchise. Box office-wise, this is probably not going to be much of a hardship, but in terms of content and style it definitely suffers in comparison. The Bourne predecessors, particularly the two directed by Paul Greengrass, are by my count some of the most exhilarating action movies in recent cinematic history. The Bourne Legacy  is not. Still, it has two very good leads in Jeremy Renner and  Rachel Weisz and a few tense, rangy sequences in a half-restored house in the Maryland woods and in the sterile confines of a high-security lab.  Tony Gilroy , who worked on the screenplays for the past three films in the series, gets a bump up to director in this installment (he also shares a writing credit), but, that jowly opening fight in Duplicity  aside, he’s no great facilitator of action scenes. Gilroy also has to reverse engineer this ungainly “sidequel” to fit around the existing mythology of the previous trilogy without overlapping it too much — Jason Bourne ( Matt Damon ) himself is mentioned many times while never appearing, but his actions are what spur the events in this film, which takes place in approximately the same time frame as  The Bourne Ultimatum . The result is a convoluted back-end story that’s grouted around what’s happened before, but is essentially the tale of a brutal clean- and cover-up. Bourne looked for clues to his identity and his reason for being; Cross (Renner), the hero of  The Bourne Legacy , is just trying to stay whole. It’s a process that’s more complicated than straightforward survival for him. Cross is an agent of Outcome, which, like Blackbriar, is a successor program to Bourne’s black ops Treadstone operation. The twist for Outcome participants is that they’ve had their physical and mental abilities enhanced by a carefully managed regimen of space age pills adjusted for their specific chemistry — “chems” are what Cross calls them, and the frequency of his insistent demands for them could be the basis a decent drinking game (it turns out he’s got a good reason for not wanting to degrade back to his standard self). Out of fear it’ll be discovered in the Blackbriar/Jason Bourne fallout, Outcome is shut down and everyone involved, agents and scientists alike, are killed. Cross happens to escape the burn down, and goes in search of the sole surviving doctor from the lab, Marta Shearing (Weisz). She’s been made a target herself, and before you know it the two are off and running to a facility in the Philippines where they hope to stabilize Cross’ condition while the National Research Assay Group, led by Eric Byer (Edward Norton), use all the technology and operatives at their disposal to track them down. Renner’s Aaron Cross is no Jason Bourne, in welcome ways. Where Bourne was half traumatized boy scout, half instinctual killing machine, Cross’ eyes are wide open — he’s had no mental break, no soul-deep shock from which to recover, no dark past to rediscover. He’s also matter-of-fact and funny, with traces of the worldly swagger Renner showed as his disturbingly fearless bomb disposal expert in The Hurt Locker ; in the midst of the on-the-go running that makes up most of the film, he manages to get a laugh out of the outrage he displays when Marta reveals she doesn’t know his name. Weisz plays her character as a dorkily committed, slightly scattered professional who’s always focused on the results of rather than the reasons behind her work, and who’s only slowly realizing the seriousness of what she’s been involved in. There’s not much time for nookie in  The Bourne Legacy ‘s multinational pursuit, but the pair have the crackle of legitimate chemistry, enough to make you want more scenes of them together and less of them in visually garbled clashes and chases. The Bourne Legacy  mimics the nigh revelatory look of the second and third Bourne movies without sharing their stomach-dropping sense of space and awareness of the physicality of their characters (the cinematographer is Oliver Wood, who also shot  The Bourne Identity  and  The Bourne Supremacy ). The brief fight scenes seem edited together punch by punch, while a race across Manila rooftops recalls the Tangier sequence in  Ultimatum without its clammy-palmed tautness — it looks more like your now-standard blockbuster parkour display. The aspects of  The Bourne Legacy that work, chief among them Renner and Weisz, feel like they should somehow be salvaged and put into their own potentially more standard action movie. As is, the film feels hampered by its own franchise, by the shoehorned-in scenes in which David Strathairn, Joan Allen, Albert Finney and others continue their covert agency cold wars that are now once removed from what’s happened to our current protagonist, and by the awkward extended intro in which Cross has been sent on a kind of probationary exercise into the wilds of Alaska during which he literally wrestles a wolf. And as the latest bureaucrat-cum-villain, Norton has distressingly little to do but bark orders at techs operating computers, the lone flashback to a past interaction with Cross giving no great sense of tie between the two, or weight to the high-tech cat-and-mouse game. Like much of the movie, Norton’s presence has a patient, diligent quality to it, as if what’s on screen is just a slog to get through before some promised fun in the next installment. Follow Alison Willmore on Twitter . Follow Movieline on Twitter .

Follow this link:
REVIEW: Despite Renner Power, Bourne Legacy Is A Slog Of A Sequel

Jimmy Fallon Not Hosting Oscars: ‘It’s An Honor To Be Asked’

Rumors had swirled that late night host Jimmy Fallon could host the 2012 Oscars telecast, with none other than SNL / Late Night producer Lorne Michaels potentially coming aboard to produce the annual extravaganza. Speaking with Matt Lauer Wednesday on the Today show, Fallon seemed to corroborate the speculation but revealed that he will not be hosting. “No, I’m not going to do the Oscars,” Fallon said. “It’s an honor to be asked by the Academy, but it’s not my year.” So wait — Fallon was asked to host, and he turned them down? Semantics, etc. Between the departure of ex-Academy president Tom Sherak and the new tenure of his successor Hawk Koch, the reported objections ABC had to hiring NBC figure Fallon, and the fact that Fallon’s late night rival Jimmy Kimmel is already hosting the Emmys — which Fallon did in 2010 to positive reviews — who knows why the Academy and Fallon couldn’t make it happen this year. If the gig’s still open, who, if not Fallon/Michaels, could finally make the Oscars telecast great again? (Put your hand down, Ratner .) Sound off, Oscarwatchers! [ THR ]

Read more here:
Jimmy Fallon Not Hosting Oscars: ‘It’s An Honor To Be Asked’

Jimmy Fallon Not Hosting Oscars: ‘It’s An Honor To Be Asked’

Rumors had swirled that late night host Jimmy Fallon could host the 2012 Oscars telecast, with none other than SNL / Late Night producer Lorne Michaels potentially coming aboard to produce the annual extravaganza. Speaking with Matt Lauer Wednesday on the Today show, Fallon seemed to corroborate the speculation but revealed that he will not be hosting. “No, I’m not going to do the Oscars,” Fallon said. “It’s an honor to be asked by the Academy, but it’s not my year.” So wait — Fallon was asked to host, and he turned them down? Semantics, etc. Between the departure of ex-Academy president Tom Sherak and the new tenure of his successor Hawk Koch, the reported objections ABC had to hiring NBC figure Fallon, and the fact that Fallon’s late night rival Jimmy Kimmel is already hosting the Emmys — which Fallon did in 2010 to positive reviews — who knows why the Academy and Fallon couldn’t make it happen this year. If the gig’s still open, who, if not Fallon/Michaels, could finally make the Oscars telecast great again? (Put your hand down, Ratner .) Sound off, Oscarwatchers! [ THR ]

Read more here:
Jimmy Fallon Not Hosting Oscars: ‘It’s An Honor To Be Asked’

*Exclusive* The Cast Of Sparkle Sings Happy Birthday To Whitney Houston [Video]

Read more:
*Exclusive* The Cast Of Sparkle Sings Happy Birthday To Whitney Houston [Video]

Aaron Sorkin Responds to Mandy Stadtmiller: Privately, Alas, and With Genuine Feeling

After perusing former New York Post reporter Mandy Stadtmiller’s must-read post for XOJane.com about how she inspired a character on Aaron Sorkin’s The Newsroom ,  I had to find out if  the show’s creator responded to her after her story hit the ‘net. He did, although his response was not what I expected. See, a long time ago, in a galaxy far away, I was a Post reporter, too — at the tabloid’s famous gossip column Page Six — and though I never dated a celebrity, I do have some experience with famous fair-weather friends. There’s a breed of celebrity that’s brilliant at seducing reporters into believing that some sort of real bond exists when really that bond is only as strong as the positive press that flows in the direction of said famous person. I’ve fallen for it more times than I’d like to admit. (And let’s just leave it at that.) I loved Stadtmiller’s post because she did the unexpected. Instead of going all  predictably tabloid on Sorkin and revealing the gories about their dates, she did something much harder: She turned the magnifying glass on herself. As she explains in her post, she inspired the character of gossip columnist Nina Howard (played by Hope Davis) after dating Sorkin around the release of The Social Network. Although initially thrilled about becoming a character in a blue-chip HBO TV show, Stadtmiller wrote after watching Davis’ debut in episode four of the series, “I will tell you that I fully cried, totally humiliated at the wreckage of what happens when you are a scheming little manipulating starfucker such as myself. Maybe it bothered me so much because I realized how close to the character I really was.” Despite the fact that Stadtmiller was essentially eviscerating herself instead of Sorkin, I guessed that an alpha-dog like him would be unhappy about the post because, in Hollywood, the more powerful you are, the more control you tend to imagine you can exert over the world, especially when it comes to how you are perceived by the people who consume your product. I was wrong. When I reached Stadtmiller, she said that Sorkin had indeed reached out to her since her tale blew up on the web. She declined to share with me the specifics of his response because, she explained, “I don’t want to be sending out press releases on everything the poor kid says to me,” but she did note that Sorkin’s reply had been “nice and kind.” “He said that he felt bad that I felt sad when I watched the episode,” she explained. That is unexpected, and — surprise, surprise — makes me want to know more. Just a suggestion, Ms. Stadtmiller and Mr. Sorkin, but why not turn this art-imitates-life debate into a dialogue?  I’m confident I’m not the only one out there who would love to read it. Follow Frank DiGiacomo on Twitter. Follow Movieline on Twitter.

Continued here:
Aaron Sorkin Responds to Mandy Stadtmiller: Privately, Alas, and With Genuine Feeling

WATCH: Jessica Biel Talks Total Recall, Politics and Getting Her Action Hero On

Jessica Biel likes to play her action heroes with a touch of femininity. Movieline pal Grace Randolph hit a special New York screening of Total Recall on Thursday night and chatted with the actress on the red carpet.  Biel plays the resistance fighter Melina and asked what quality she likes to bring to her action roles, tells Randolph that she aims to portray a character “who feels like a real woman,”  not “someone who’s so tough that you can relate to [her] but someone who is feminine and has an emotional arc as well as a physical arc. The screening was hosted by The Peggy Siegal Company and InStyle magazine, which features the beautiful Biel on the cover of its August issue. After the screening, guests headed to Meatpacking District nightclub No. 8 to compare notes and Len Wiseman’s remake with Paul Verhoeven’s 1990 original starring Arnold Schwarzenegger. Watch it on YouTube. Follow Movieline on Twitter.

Read more here:
WATCH: Jessica Biel Talks Total Recall, Politics and Getting Her Action Hero On

Scarlett Johansson Gives Breathy Vocals for Single Bonnie and Clyde: Take a Listen

Scarlett Johansson ‘s sexy pillowy voice has once again been leant to recorded music. The Avengers star joined French recording star Lulu Gainsbourg for a club-loungy version of Bonnie & Clyde . The song is just one from other notables who took part in an album, which Gainsbourg created as a tribute for his father, Serge Gainsbourg. Other famous voices bellowing for the album called From Gainsbourg to Lulu are Iggy Pop, Rufus Wainwright as well as Johnny Depp and now ex Vanessa Paradis. In the original song, based off a poem penned by infamous outlaw Bonnie Parker herself, the elder Gainsbourg paired up with another blonde bombshell of the day, French actress Brigitte Bardot back in 1968. So, this latest duo seems a perfect match. The only notable change aside from the latest version’s apparently softer tone is that Johansson sings her parts in English, while Gainsbourg sticks with French. But this is not the first time Johansson has hit the recording studio. She also released an entire album of Tom Waits covers back in 2008. Listen to Scarlett Johansson and Lulu Gainsbourg’s verion of Bonnie & Clyde here . Listen to Johnny Depp and Vanessa Paradis’ version of Ballade de Melodie Nelson here . [Sources: Blogcritics , Huffington Post , E Online ]

The rest is here:
Scarlett Johansson Gives Breathy Vocals for Single Bonnie and Clyde: Take a Listen

No Ghostbusters 3 for Bill Murray; Matthew McConaughey Joins Martin Scorsese Pic: Biz Break

Also in Thursday afternoon’s round-up of news briefs, Lynn Cohen joins the cast of the next Hunger Games , while Lucas Till takes on an action-thriller. Doc NYC releases some highlights for its November documentary festival. Drew Barrymore has a new directing gig. And Octavia Spencer joins a new Fox Searchlight comedy. Lynn Cohen Joins The Hunger Games: Catching Fire Cohen will play Mags in the next installment of the popular franchise. A former mentor to Finnick Odair, Mags is an eighty year old Hunger Games victor from District 4. The second round of the series begins as “Katniss Everdeen has returned home safe after winning the 74th Annual Hunger Games along with fellow tribute Peeta Mellark.   Winning means that they must turn around and leave their family and close friends, embarking on a “Victor’s Tour” of the districts.  Along the way Katniss senses that a rebellion is simmering, but the Capitol is still very much in control as President Snow prepares the 75th Annual Hunger Games (The Quarter Quell) – a competition that could change Panem forever.” Lionsgate will release Catching Fire November 22nd. Doc NYC to Close with The Central Park Five New York’s documentary festival Doc NYC will close out its third annual event with Den Burns, Sarah Burns and David McMahon’s The Central Park Five . The film, which debuted at the Cannes Film Festival in May, follows the story of five innocent teenagers wrongfully imprisoned for the infamous “Central Park jogger” rape case. The festival also announced an ambitious, expanded line-up of panel discussions called “Doc-a-thon,” covering the art and business of documentary filmmaking. Spanning five days, the program features some twenty seminars and panels with acclaimed filmmakers and experts devoted to different stages in the filmmaking process. Doc NYC takes place November 8 – 15. Lucas Till Boards Wolves Till ( X-Men: First Class ) will play the lead in the directorial debut of David Hayter’s Wolves who wrote X-Men . The action-thriller centers on Caleb Richards (Till) – a young, handsome eighteen year-old with an edge.  Forced to hit the road after the death of his parents, Caleb finds his way to an isolated town to hunt down the truths of his ancestry. Around the ‘net… Bill Murray Won’t Haunt Ghostbusters 3 Dan Aykroyd said, “”It’s sad but we’re passing it on to a new generation. Ghostbusters 3 can be a successful movie without Bill.” Aykroyd also offered up that the sequel will begin shooting next year and also without its original star, Vulture reports . Matthew McConaughey Joins The Wolf Of Wall Street McConaughey will play Mark Hanna in the Martin Scorsese-directed feature, an early boss and mentor of Belfort, played by Leonardo DiCaprio, Deadline reports . Drew Barrymore to Direct The End The end of the world drama will be produced by Warner Bros. The story will apparently focus on several people as they face the apocalypse and will take an “uplifting and humanistic” approach. Aron Eli Coleite (writer-producer on TV’s Heroes ) wrote the script, THR reports . Octavia Spencer Joins Baggage Claim The Oscar-winner boards the cast of the Fox Searchlight comedy that stars Paula Patton as a flight attendant who is the oldest unmarried woman in her family and decides to find a mate before her sister’s upcoming wedding, Deadline reports .

Excerpt from:
No Ghostbusters 3 for Bill Murray; Matthew McConaughey Joins Martin Scorsese Pic: Biz Break

Kate Beckinsale on Her Total Recall Villainess and Other People’s Perceptions: It’s ‘The Road to Complete Madness’

At one point, Kate Beckinsale remembers, director Len Wiseman thought of tapping her for a cameo as a three-breasted hooker in his Total Recall remake. Luckily for the actress, Wiseman (who directed the British beauty in Underworld and Underworld: Evolution — and happens to be her husband in real life) instead cast Beckinsale in the much juicier role of Lori, the adoring wife of factory worker Douglas Quaid (Colin Farrell) whom Quaid discovers is actually an undercover agent hellbent on killing him. Consider that a divorce, indeed . Expanded considerably by scribes Kurt Wimmer and Mark Bomback as an amalgam of Sharon Stone’s duplicitous Lori and Michael Ironside’s ruthless Richter from Paul Verhoeven’s 1990 version , Beckinsale’s Lori — her first onscreen villain — is baddie Cohaagen’s (Bryan Cranston) loyal right-hand woman, embittered by the humiliating role she’s been assigned, but relishing in her dogged pursuit of Farrell’s Quaid with glee. (She also boasts unfailingly fantastic hair, in keeping with Beckinsale’s action cinema filmography.) Beckinsale sat for a chat with Movieline about Total Recall , Lori’s inner psyche, how marriage lends insight to her working relationship with Wiseman, and how she resolves her “Kate Beckinsale” public image/action heroine reputation with her literary roots and lesser-seen work. This version of Total Recall is quite different from the Verhoeven original in many ways, including its emphasis on a more geopolitical commentary. But the Lori character in particular, which is vastly expanded here, is a sharp, strong woman who literally rejects this domestic role that she’s been given, playing wife to Douglas Quaid at the behest of her employer. I think she’s an extremely highly trained, highly intelligent, and very much at the top of her field operative, and the detail that she’s been given is actually quite degrading, if you think about it. For a police officer at that level to have to basically sleep in a bed, have sex with, make dinner for this person who appears to be a factory worker of no real note indefinitely, must be incredibly frustrating – and I think must feel like, “I have this because I’m a woman.” And there’s nothing more maddening than to feel like you’re being passed over or degraded or humiliated because of your gender. Were these elements that were in the script originally, or did those shades come in as you worked on the character? It was a little more sketched, and I know that Len wanted to feel like that about her, so it was quite early on when we were talking about the character. Because otherwise I think it’s peculiar; first of all, it’s a strange situation for someone to be undercover pretending to be somebody’s wife. What would that feel like, if you were that highly trained? And equally, there’s nothing more boring than a bad guy who’s just being a bad guy for no reason. Mainstream audiences know you best from the Underworld movies and as this lithe, lethal action heroine, but your career began with very different kinds of roles; ironically, the character of Hero in Much Ado About Nothing was one of your first breakthrough parts. And even before that, some of your first awards came as a writer, for your poetry. Does it feel strange to you that so many moviegoers know you primarily for your action roles in the Underworld movies and the like? I think that dwelling on other people’s perception of you is the road to complete madness, unfortunately. I try and resist that. You can’t help it a bit, because it is quite odd when other people are responsible for conveying your image or your words. That is quite a strange spot to be in, especially if things do come off unfamiliar. You can feel a bit gypped. But I suppose a part of you has to go, there is a kind of penalty for being so lucky to have this kind of a job that those things are going to happen. I do feel very fulfilled by the work that I’ve done, and often by the work that I’ve done that many people haven’t seen. So the bottom line is, I have actually done the work and I’ve had that experience, and it has been amazing. And yes, it would be nice if more people were aware of those, but at the end of the day it’s more important that I’ve actually had the experience. Even on Google, the first items that pop up about you involve your “Sexiest Woman Alive” type honors, or quote you talking about nude scenes… It’s maddening! And the thing is, a lot of the time you’ll do a whole long interview with somebody and then they’ll say, “By the way, have you thought about doing a nude scene?” and that’s the thing… so it’s quite skewed in terms of the balance of the interview where you’re talking about all sorts of things, but people tend to pull out the one that fits the image they have for you. And that can be a little bit annoying if it’s always about, you know, not having knickers on or being sexy or what beauty products are you using? I have no idea who that person is. It’s just odd when you kind of go, I’m coming off a bit as the sort of person who walks into a room and tries to tell everyone what I’m eating all day. Len [Wiseman] said he wanted to cast you in the role of Lori because he saw aspects in the character that he thought you hadn’t had the chance to play onscreen before very much – even Lori’s guile, her complexity. She’s not a comedic character, but the film has a sense of humor about her. What’s your take on Lori as a role? I think this is a really good part, and really great parts don’t come along every ten seconds. But I think the thing that’s great about her is she’s really intelligent – she’s obviously a bit unhinged, but she’s a very, very smart person, and people who are crazy and smart at the same time are usually the most dangerous people. I think he really wanted to get a sense of that, and I may have been in some rather not-very-intelligent looking photo shoots and/or movies, but my husband observes me in my natural habitat and knows that I’m quite a smart girl. It’s nice that your offscreen relationship could help lend that sort of insight into your working relationship. And it means he’s not just receiving the kind of Kate Beckinsale that’s out there. The quote-unquote “Kate Beckinsale.” Yes! There’s a dichotomy and gender reversal as Lori reveals herself and attempts to kill Quaid: As she chases him through the city, it’s clear that she’s highly lethal and the disoriented Quaid is rather clumsy and scared. Later you two have the most brutal hand-to-hand fight, but it remains on equal footing. I really like the movie, for all of that. It’s a very fun ride, but it’s actually very thoughtful. What deeper meaning could we draw from Len casting his own wife as the ultimate evil wife? And all the film’s many nods to their sham marriage, were those written in to begin with? Some of them were, some of them we came up with. But we obviously don’t have that sort of relationship. Len is still walking around! [Laughs] Total Recall is in theaters Friday. Read Movieline’s review here . Follow Jen Yamato on Twitter . Follow Movieline on Twitter .

Link:
Kate Beckinsale on Her Total Recall Villainess and Other People’s Perceptions: It’s ‘The Road to Complete Madness’

REVIEW: Breaking Up Is Hard To Do In Charming Celeste and Jesse Forever

Films like  Celeste and Jesse Forever  and  The Five-Year Engagement feel like the start of some new subgenre — these unromantic semi-comedies about the microdramas of nice, emotionally inarticulate people struggling their way through relationships. Both feature comedic actors working with material that’s not intended to be all that funny, and both take angles on relationships that don’t usually make it to screen — a prolonged breakup leading up to a divorce and a prolonged, unhappy stretch leading up to a wedding. And both cruise on the charms of their lead actors, in this case Rashida Jones and  Andy Samberg , holding together just enough to be satisfying while also leaving you wishing they had a little more to them. Jones doesn’t just star in Celeste and Jesse Forever , she co-wrote the screenplay with Will McCormack (who also appears onscreen) —  The Vicious Kind ‘s Lee Toland Krieger directs. It’s an interesting role for an actress to sculpt for herself, and the fact that Jones worked to make it happen speaks to the dearth of complicated, flawed female characters that are out there. Celeste, the character Jones plays, has definite hangups, realistic ones that the film explores with almost too much enthusiasm — she can be hard to spend time with as she strikes out at her friends and herself in the process of actually getting in touch with her emotions. Despite the title, the film’s far more hers than Jesse’s (Samberg) — this isn’t so much a rom-com or even a break-up movie as it is a portrait of a woman getting her unearned certainly about life shaken up a bit, and coming to terms with her own imperfections. Celeste and Jesse have been best friends since high school, and when the film starts we see them together in a car, sharing old jokes and the conversational shorthand of people who’ve known each other for a very long time. They go to dinner with their friends Beth (Ari Graynor) and Tucker (Eric Christian Olsen), who are prepping for their own wedding, and we learn that all this adorable couple behavior isn’t cute, it’s actually a little weird, because Celeste and Jesse have been broken up for six months — and while they’re ending their marriage, they still spend all their time together. Celeste is a trend forecaster (she’s written a book called Shitegeist ) and Jesse is a mostly unemployed artist, and the two are gleefully co-dependent (he’s moved out — to the guest house in the back yard). Not having gotten to see them as they were breaking up, we’re left to extrapolate their problems from the fallout as their precarious set-up crumbles under the weight of denial and miscommunication, as Jesse obviously thinks Celeste is working up to taking him back while she’s enjoying having him around but not having him too close. When he finally realizes they’re done, she comes to terms with the fact that maybe she’s not, but by then he’s gotten inextricably involved with someone new. Celeste and Jesse Forever has an affectionate, grounded take on Los Angeles, which comes across like a tangibly pleasant, lived-in place on screen (still a relative rarity for the city in movies), one in which you can run into friends at furniture stores and miss your dinner reservation at the Chateau Marmont. The film blends in bits of the showbiz industry in a matter-of-fact way — Celeste gets set up on a date with a 22-year-old male Gap model, and reluctantly takes for a client a teenybopper pop star (Emma Roberts) whose music she can’t stand. There’s a specificity to its cultural references and the locations its characters frequent that’s pleasing, and that’s more natural than the sometimes strained bits of quirkiness that mark relationships like the one between Celeste and her business partner Scott (Elijah Wood), who tries to be her self-awarely sassy gay bestie. Jesse, placed in a situation where he has to man up, proves himself capable of turning into the responsible adult Celeste claims she always wanted him to be, while she crumbles, claims she’s okay, tries to date when she’s not ready (the omnipresent Chris Messina is her best self-deprecating suitor) and smokes a lot of non-medicinal marijuana. Jones proves wonderfully willing to put herself in humiliating situations, whether overindulging at an engagement party or going on a wince-worthy dinner with a guy (Rich Sommer) whose name she can’t get straight. But her toughest scenes are the ones in which she undercuts people again and again, telling one he isn’t ready for fatherhood, another that he obviously isn’t the right match for her, and assuming (and needing) Jesse’s new girlfriend to be dumb. The way the film and its lead actress are willing to let the character fall on her face repeatedly and realistically is impressive, though the general formlessness of Celeste’s crisis makes the process, well, a lot like witnessing someone you’re fond of insist on making terrible mistakes over and over again.  Celeste and Jesse Forever creates a handful of likable and very human characters, so much so that halfway through you want the film to stop putting them through the emotional wringer so that you can just spend time with them. Follow Alison Willmore on Twitter . Follow Movieline on Twitter .

See the rest here:
REVIEW: Breaking Up Is Hard To Do In Charming Celeste and Jesse Forever