Tag Archives: Obama

Obama deception censored

“Obama Deception Censored” is at the time of writing the most popular search term on Google, hinting that there may be some interest in the censorship story. According to reports, the video had recently “gone viral” and was gaining some media attention before YouTube deleted it. YouTube has been accused of censoring a movie attacking US President Barack Obama, in a move the maker is calling illegal. The movie “The Obama Deception” claims (among other things) that “the Obama phenomenon is a ho

Follow this link:
Obama deception censored

BP says it finally stops oil spewing from Gulf gusher

The oil has stopped. For now. After 85 days and up to 184 million gallons, BP finally gained control over one of America's biggest environmental catastrophes Thursday by placing a carefully fitted cap over a runaway geyser that has been gushing crude into the Gulf of Mexico since early spring. Though a temporary fix, the accomplishment was greeted with hope, high expectations — and, in many cases along the beleaguered coastline, disbelief. From one Gulf Coast resident came this: “Hallelujah.” And from another: “I got to see it to believe it.” If the cap holds, if the sea floor doesn't crack and if the relief wells being prepared are completed successfully, this could be the beginning of the end for the spill. But that's a lot of ifs, and no one was declaring any sort of victory beyond the moment. The oil stopped flowing at 3:25 p.m. EDT when the last of three valves in the 75-ton cap was slowly throttled shut. That set off a 48-hour watch period in which — much like the hours immediately after a surgery — the patient was in stable, guarded condition and being watched closely for complications. “It's a great sight,” said BP Chief Operating Officer Doug Suttles, who immediately urged caution. The flow, he said, could resume. “It's far from the finish line. … It's not the time to celebrate.” Nevertheless, one comforting fact stood out: For the first time since an explosion on the BP-leased Deepwater Horizon oil rig killed 11 workers April 20 and unleashed the spill 5,000 feet beneath the water's surface, no oil was flowing into the Gulf. President Barack Obama, who has encouraged, cajoled and outright ordered BP to stop the leak, called Thursday's development “a positive sign.” But Obama, whose political standing has taken a hit because of the spill and accusations of government inaction, cautioned that “we're still in the testing phase.” The worst-case scenario would be if the oil forced down into the bedrock ruptured the seafloor irreparably. Leaks deep in the well bore might also be found, which would mean that oil would continue to flow into the Gulf. And there's always the possiblity of another explosion, either from too much pressure or from a previously unknown unstable piece of piping. The drama that unfolded quietly in the darkness of deep water Thursday was a combination of trial, error, technology and luck. It came after weeks of repeated attempts to stop the oil — everything from robotics to different capping techniques to stuffing the hole with mud and golf balls. The week leading up to the moment where the oil stopped was a series of fitful starts and setbacks. Robotic submarines working deep in the ocean removed a busted piece of pipe last weekend, at which point oil flowed unimpeded into the water. That was followed by installation of a connector that sits atop the spewing well bore — and by Monday the 75-ton metal cap, a stack of lines and valves latched onto the busted well. After that, engineers spent hours creating a map of the rock under the sea floor to spot potential dangers, like gas pockets. They also shut down two ships collecting oil above the sea to get an accurate reading on the pressure in the cap. As the oil flowed up to the cap, increasing the pressure, two valves were shut off like light switches, and the third dialed down on a dimmer switch until it too was choked off. And just like that, the oil stopped. It's not clear yet whether the oil will remain bottled in the cap, or whether BP will choose to use the new device to funnel the crude into four ships on the surface. For nearly two months, the world's window into the disaster has been through a battery of BP cameras, known as the “spillcam.” The constant stream of spewing oil became a fixture on cable TV news and web feeds. That made it all the more dramatic on Thursday when, suddenly, it was no more. On the video feed, the violently churning cloud of oil and gas coming out of a narrow tube thinned, and tapered off. Suddenly, there were a few puffs of oil, surrounded by cloudy dispersant that BP was pumping on top. Then there was nothing. “Finally!” said Renee Brown, a school guidance counselor visiting Pensacola Beach, Fla., from London, Ky. “Honestly, I'm surprised that they haven't been able to do something sooner, though.” Alabama Gov. Bob Riley's face lit up when he heard the news. “I think a lot of prayers were answered today,” he said. The next 48 hours are critical. Engineers and scientists will be monitoring the cap around the clock, looking for pressure changes. High pressure is good, because it shows there's only a single leak. Low pressure, below 6,000 pounds per square inch or so, could mean more leaks farther down in the well. Thad Allen, the retired Coast Guard admiral overseeing the spill for the government, said they are deciding as they go along whether to release oil into the water again. At the end of the 48-hour test it's possible oil will start to flow again — but, theoretically, in a controlled manner. When the test is complete, more seafloor mapping will be done to detect any damage or deep-water leaks. added by: JanforGore

Obama Adminstration’s Ridiculous Pornography Trial Violates Constitution & Individual Rights

Click here for full article! http://www.lp.org/news/press-releases/ridiculous-pornography-trial-violates-cons… The federal trial of pornographer John Stagliano began last week. Libertarian National Committee Chairman Mark Hinkle issued the following statement today: “The Obama Administration's prosecution of John Stagliano is a travesty. “As Reason magazine's Richard Abowitz wrote, 'The case against Stagliano concerns the selling of movies performed by consenting adults to entertain adult DVD viewers who have chosen to watch these films. In a free and open society this is exactly the kind of prosecution that should not happen.' “Many Americans find it far more obscene that Democrats and Republicans are piling trillions of dollars of debt on our children and gr…….. …………”It is worth noting that this case was not initiated by citizen complaints. FBI agents just purchased the materials, watched them, and then brought charges. It's clear that the FBI budget needs to be cut. “Apparently President Obama's Justice Department is no different than former President Bush's when it comes to prosecuting speech. Obama has sustained the 'Obscene Prosecution Task Force,' which was created by the Bush Administration in 2005.” The Libertarian Party's platform states, “We support full freedom of expression and oppose government censorship, regulation or control of communications media and technology.”….. http://www.lp.org/news/press-releases/ridiculous-pornography-trial-violates-cons… added by: shanklinmike

Andrea Mitchell: House Democrats’ Spat With Gibbs is ‘Unfortunate’

MSNBC anchor Andrea Mitchell is apparently a tad disappointed that the conflict between Speaker Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Robert Gibbs festered as much as it has recently. While talking to Politico’s Jonathan Martin about yesterday’s meeting at the White House between House Democrats and Obama administration officials, Mitchell lamented that the four-day uproar was “a little bit unfortunate.” “You think they didn’t need a four-day story about their infighting?” Mitchell asked sounding slightly annoyed that things escalated to that level for the Democrats. Mitchell analyzed the situation as an awkward statement that needlessly morphed into a full-blown conflict. “It just seems like Robert just answered a question on Meet the Press, and the Democrats decided to make a federal case out of it.” “But better now Andrea, in July, than October,” Martin reassured her. A transcript of the segment, which aired on July 15, at 1:25 p.m. EDT, is as follows: ANDREA MITCHELL, MSNBC anchor: Do you think that they sort of kissed and made up with “Brother Gibbs”? JONATHAN MARTIN, senior political reporter, Politico: Well I don’t think that Robert Gibbs was actually at this meeting, but I think the consensus that you hear today from Democrats, on both sides of Pennsylvania Ave., is that they are ready to move on and try and get beyond this, and try to hang together here for these next four months. MITCHELL: You think they didn’t need a four-day story about their infighting? A little bit unfortunate. It seems like, you know, Robert just answered a question on Meet the Press, and the Democrats decided to make a federal case out of it. Anyway. MARTIN: But better now, Andrea, in July, than October, certainly for them. MITCHELL: Exactly.

Here is the original post:
Andrea Mitchell: House Democrats’ Spat With Gibbs is ‘Unfortunate’

Luke Russert Touts Financial Bill as ‘Huge Victory’ for Dems, Fulfills Obama’s Promise of ‘Change’

Reporting Thursday from Capitol Hill, MSNBC congressional correspondent Luke Russert touted a likely win for Senate Democrats on the Financial Reform Bill, saying it would be a “huge victory.” “Obviously, [President Obama] ran on the slogan ‘Change you can believe in,’ with health care reform and financial regulatory reform,” Russert commented, thus tying the passage of the financial reform bill with success of Obama’s message of “change.” Using the 60-38 result of the Senate vote in favor of cloture, Luke Russert said the final vote would come late Thursday afternoon, probably resulting in a Democrat victory for financial reform, thus accomplishing a task President Obama began last year. Russert, however, had a bit of trouble identifying two of the major players in the financial crisis. Republicans, he reported, said the bill wasn’t “going far enough in terms of reforming Freddie Mae and Fannie Mac , two facets of the government they say were very much responsible for that meltdown in 2008.” The transcript of Russert’s segment, which aired on July 15 at 12:04 p.m. EDT, is as follows: CONTESSA BREWER, MSNBC anchor: Luke, here we’ve seen more than a year of political wrangling, and it looks like this bill will cross the finish line. LUKE RUSSERT, MSNBC congressional correspondent: It absolutely will indeed, according to sources from the Democratic side, Contessa. The first procedural vote just happened in the past hour, 60-38 Republicans, three of which – Scott Brown, Olympia Snowe, and Susan Collins from Maine – joined with 57 Democrats to bring forth cloture. That’s the first procedural matter here. Then we will have a final vote this Thursday afternoon and most likely deliver President Obama a huge victory that he set out to do last year. Obviously he ran on the slogan “Change you can believe in,” with healthcare reform and this financial regulatory reform. The administration and the Democratic Party feels they’ve accomplished two amazing things. It’s going to be interesting to see how much the Democrats will pump this out in terms of their messaging for the next month heading into the August recess. They obviously are going to try to frame it as they’re standing with Main Street, while Republicans stand with Wall Street. Republicans have been very harsh on this bill, saying that it’s way too much government regulation, and will restrict lending at a time when people desperately need lending from small community banks. They also say it’s not going far enough in terms of reforming Freddie Mae and Fannie Mac , two facets of the government they say were very much responsible for that meltdown in 2008, September of that year, Contessa.

Read more here:
Luke Russert Touts Financial Bill as ‘Huge Victory’ for Dems, Fulfills Obama’s Promise of ‘Change’

Media That Accused Fox of Shilling for Bush Yawn at Zuckerman’s Ties to Obama

Days after Mort Zuckerman, the Editor-in-Chief of U.S. News and World Report,  claimed to be close to President Obama’s advisors, the national media have yet to express any interest. Of the few outlets that mentioned it, the White House’s denial was taken as gospel truth, and no more investigation was apparently warranted. What a difference when the sitting president is a Democrat. Under the Bush Administration, the media were obsessed with linking the White House to Fox News in an effort to accuse Republicans of spreading propaganda. Yet now that U.S. News is linked to Obama, suddenly such allegations are quickly dimissed. For a taste of the double standard, observe two different reports from Politico. First is a post on Tuesday concerning Zuckerman: Real Estate and media mogul Mort Zuckerman raised eyebrows all over yesterday with the claim on Fox that he “helped write one of [Obama’s] speeches,” and his subsequent refusal to go into it right now. Among those with reason to be puzzled, a White House source tells me, were Obama’s speechwriters, Jon Favreau and Ben Rhodes. Neither “has ever met or spoken to Mort Zuckerman” and the two have “been closely involved in every speech the President has given since 2005,” said the official. Zuckerman has met President Obama a few times and no doubt encountered other Administration officials, and he could well have suggested a theme to the president or another aide. But the question of what he “helped write”  remains a bit of a mystery. Those three small paragraphs comprise Ben Smith’s entire report. President Obama is denying the story, so that’s just that. Was that kind of trust extended to Republicans under President Bush? Not so much. Here’s Politico giving space to one Matt Stoller in 2007: First, we argued that Fox News is not a news channel, but a propaganda outlet that regularly distorts, spins, and falsifies information. Second, Fox News is heavily influenced or even controlled by the Republican Party itself. As such, we believe that Fox News on the whole functions as a surrogate operation for the GOP. Treating Fox as a legitimate news channel extends the Republican Party’s ability to swift-boat and discredit our candidates. In other words, Fox News is a direct pipeline of misinformation from the GOP leadership into the traditional press. So, we have a self-proclaimed fan of Obama working as Editor-in-Chief of a major newspaper, but Politico isn’t much worried about bias seeping onto his pages. But when Fox News is perceived as being in the tank for Republicans, it’s apparently okay to launch accusations against them. In 2002, the Washington Post’s Bob Woodward revealed that Fox News head Roger Ailes had written a letter to President Bush immediately after the attacks on September 11. Woodward portrayed it as improper contact between the White House and the press, but Ailes insisted it was nothing more than an emotional letter from a scared citizen following a terrorist attack. The media jumped all over the controversy with fervor. On November 21 of that year, PBS News Hour filed a report on the scandal, with host Terrence Smith asking bluntly “is that an appropriate role for a journalist,” which set up a nice tee for Woodward to reply “he’s not supposed to do it.” News Hour then provided input from Tucker Carlson: Roger Ailes is the editorial chief of fox news [sic], and this gives the appearance of partisanship. This is sucking up to power. Then CNN’s Arthel Neville: Does that shed new light on, “we report, you decide,” Jack? And of course an expert from Harvard: Mr. Ailes has had a very close relation with a number of Republican presidents. I doubt this is a letter — despite what he said in the Washington Post — I doubt this is a letter that he would have sent to [Democratic President] Bill Clinton. The current reaction to Zuckerman’s claim of advising public officials? Mostly crickets. Salon covered the incident if only to promptly insist “it is safe to say that this is not true” and Zuckerman’s rebuttal was “kind of sad.” A search for Mort Zuckerman on Google News reaps scant results, mostly from blogs, and certainly nothing like the accusations launched against Fox News. Curiously missing is someone to accuse Zuckerman of “sucking up” to Democrats. No one took to the airwaves of PBS to suggest he wouldn’t have offered speechwriting help to a Republican. And no one sat on the air at CNN asking if U.S. News & World Report could be trusted as unbiased news. Any news source that is perceived as being friendly to Republicans is presumed to be a propaganda wing for the GOP. Yet when a well-respected editor openly flaunts his support of a Democrat, the media’s reaction is a collective shrug. Americans will probably never get the truth about exactly how close Zuckerman is to the White House – and that’s the way the media want it.

See the original post:
Media That Accused Fox of Shilling for Bush Yawn at Zuckerman’s Ties to Obama

Fox News Anchor in Screaming Fit

|main|dl9|link4|http2F%2F www.bvblackspin.com 2F072Fmegyn-kelly-and-kirsten-powers-joust-over-new-black-panther-civi%2F Fox News reporter Megyn Kelly (pictured) and New York Post columnist Kirsten Powers went at it recently, regarding charges from a former Justice Department lawyer that civil rights cases where whites are the victims are ignored. The case involves allegations against two New Black Panther Party members who were accused of intimidating white voters near the entrance to the polling place of a largely black neighborhood. The men allegedly called white voters “white devil” and said that once Obama was elected, they would be “ruled by the black man, cracker.” The Bush Administration, who many observers agree had a terrible civil rights record, brought suit against the men. The new administration, including Attorney General Eric Holder, dropped the charges because they did not feel there was much of a case. “To some, the civil rights laws are not meant to protect all Americans, they are meant to protect certain Americans,” said former Justice lawyer J. Christian Adams, a conservative who helped prosecute the New Black Panther Party case. The case has taken on a life of its own in conservative circles and on Fox News, where Kelly and Powers went at it. The two women tried to talk over one another for most of the “interview,” while Kelly accused Powers of not being informed about the case: “You don't seem to know what you're talking about,” Kelly said. “Where was this outrage when the Bush Administration … was dismissing cases where black people were discriminated against?” Powers asked. “The minute I challenge you, you say I don't know what I'm talking about.” “Because you don't,” Kelly responded. At one point, Kelly threatened Powers, saying, “Don't make me cut your mic.” Although Kelly was louder, Powers held her own, saying the case was really about “the scary black man thing.” She also called Adams a “conservative activist posing as a whistleblower” and said this one case should not “provoke hysteria” as it has because action was taken in the form of an injunction. The Bush Administration, meanwhile, stocked the civil rights division with conservatives while failing to prosecute many civil rights cases involving blacks. “It's ridiculous to accuse the Obama Administration of not doing anything when they have,” said Powers. “Two wrongs make a right,” Kelly kept repeating. Mediaite columnist Colby Hall said the interview displayed “remarkably uncomfortable levels not normally seen on any cable news program.” added by: TimALoftis

MSNBC’s Dylan Ratigan Froths: Wall Street Frightens ‘Little Boy’ Obama, Makes Him ‘Bend Over’

MSNBC’s Dylan Ratigan appeared on Morning Joe, Wednesday, to dismiss Barack Obama as a “little boy” in the eyes of Wall Street and to assert the President “just bends over,” rather than stand up to the financial industry. The charged language surprised host Joe Scarborough who sputtered, “You know, I was so uncomfortable with a couple of the things you said and then the exclamation point at the end.” Speaking of financial reform, Ratigan attacked, “…When the Wall Street guys got across the table from him and said ‘Oh you going to change our tax code little boy ?'” After dismissing Obama’s ability to oppose Wall Street, Ratigan vulgarly claimed, ” But with this guy, he just bends over every time.” After Scarborough and co-host Mika Brzezinski expressed their amazement over the comments, Ratigan first asserted, “I’m not trying to offend.” He then quickly changed course and opined, “I am trying to offend, because I am offended. And everybody in America is offended and they are right to be offended.” Ratigan isn’t the first MSNBC and Morning Joe regular to make highly questionable comments. On February 23, 2010 , Donny Deutsch appeared on another program, the Joy Behar Show, and referred to Republican Marco Rubio as a “coconut.” (Coconut is a racist term for Hispanics who are brown on the outside and white on the inside.) Deutsch later apologized . Considering that many liberal journalists have jumped on any criticism of Obama as proof of racism, it will be interesting to see how Ratigan’s comments are received. A transcript of the July 14 segment, which aired at 7:11am EDT, follows: JOE SCARBOROUGH: When do we start cutting back? DYLAN RATIGAN: We start cutting after we start clawing back. I don’t know why, as country, we refuse to deal with the issue of compensation that is being paid out to individuals who are taking that money predicated on their control of the government and not on their introduction of any value. 75 percent of what happens in the financial industry is a racket. It should be basically outlawed so that we can restore capitalism. And why we don’t deal with tax dodge that exists at the top. Again, Barack Obama, very aggressive in his campaign trail about [starts doing an Obama impression] how he was going to take care of the private equity tax loophole and work for the American people. It’s not a very good Barack Obama. Maybe that was- JOHN HEILMANN: Sounds more like a Texas Congressman. RATIGAN: And he didn’t do it, when it came down to it, when the Wall Street guys got across the table from him and said “Oh you going to change our tax code little boy? ” I think not. Because I’ll tell you right now, when you’re a 75 yr old or an 80 year old billionaire from New York who is looking at any government in this country that’s trying to play with the tax code- Who know who wins, the 80 year old billionaire from New York every time. If its Teddy Roosevelt in office who is not intimated by these types of people he might say “Listen. I don’t care who you are, I don’t care how rich you are, its not going to happen.” But with this guy, he just bends over every time. MIKA BRZEZINSKI: Dylan, you’re very- Oh, my God! SCARBOROUGH: You know, I was so uncomfortable with a couple of the things you said and then the exclamation point at the end. RATIGAN: It’s unbelievable to me. I’m not trying to offend. SCARBOROUGH: Well- RATIGAN: No, no. They want to cut teachers and cops, okay?. You want to cut teachers and police in California, in Massachusetts and Ohio, but you don’t want to restore any fairness to the tax code or eliminate the theft, let alone the extraction? We go to BP, health care, etc. SCARBOROUGH: You don’t actually try to offend. RATIGAN: I am trying to offend, because I am offended. And everybody in America is offended and they are right to be offended.

Read the original post:
MSNBC’s Dylan Ratigan Froths: Wall Street Frightens ‘Little Boy’ Obama, Makes Him ‘Bend Over’

What Does The Financial Reform Bill Do Other Than Being Completely And Utterly Worthless?

Is it possible to write a 2,300 page piece of legislation that accomplishes next to nothing and is pretty much completely and utterly worthless? The answer is yes. Barack Obama has been trumpeting the Dodd-Frank financial reform bill as the “biggest rewrite of Wall Street rules since the Great Depression”, but the truth is that after the Wall Street lobbyists got done carving it up, the bill that was left was so watered down and so toothless that it essentially accomplishes nothing except creating even more government bureaucracy and even more mind-numbing paperwork. The bill is so riddled with loopholes for the big banks that it is basically the legislative equivalent of Swiss cheese. The Democrats in the Senate were ecstatic when they announced that they had secured the 60 votes needed to pass this legislation, but when they are asked about what the financial reform bill will do, most of them are left stammering for some kind of cohesive response. The sad truth is that most of them probably don't understand the bill and none of them will probably ever read the entire thing. added by: Revelation1217

ABC Hypes NAACP Indictment of Tea Party as Racist, a Smear the Network Stoked

Four months after ABC’s World News spent a weekend defaming anti-ObamaCare Tea Party protesters as “very ugly” with “ reports of racial and homophobic slurs ,” citing “protesters roaming Washington, some of them increasingly emotional, yelling slurs and epithets ,” Tuesday’s newscast, unlike those on CBS and NBC, credentialed the NAACP ‘s charge that the “Tea Party movement is a threat to the pursuit of human rights, justice and equality for all.” Sans any ideological label, anchor Diane Sawyer set up the full July 13 story: “The nation’s oldest civil rights organization, the NAACP , has just adopted a resolution this evening at its annual convention condemning quote, ‘racist behavior by Tea Party members.’” Reporter Dan Harris relayed: The NAACP points to the racial epithets allegedly hurled at black members of Congress by Tea Party members during the health care debate and to the racist signs that critics say they spotted at Tea Party events to support its conclusion that the “Tea Party movement is a threat to the pursuit of human rights, justice and equality for all.” Going to a Tea Party leader who is black, Harris pressed: “We’ve all seen the signs. There have been signs that compare Baarck Obama to a monkey, there have been signs that have had the ‘n’ word on them. When you see those signs, how do you feel?” Harris, however, did at least quote Sarah Palin’s tweet asking: “Are liberty-loving, equality-respecting patriots racist?” And, citing an ABC News/Washington Post survey, he noted “the biggest reasons people join the Tea Party are politics and ideology, rather than views on race.” Earlier NB item on Tuesday afternoon about an ABCNews.com post headlined: “Michelle Obama Rouses NAACP Before Vote Condemning ‘Racist’ Elements of Tea Party” Back in March, NB archive: Saturday, March 20 : “ABC: Anti-ObamaCare Protest ‘Turned Very Ugly’ with ‘Racial and Homophobic Slurs’” Sunday, March 21 : “ABC’s Sawyer: ‘Protesters Roaming’ DC, ‘Increasingly Emotional, Yelling Slurs and Epithets’” Plus, from March 21 : “CBS: ‘Mean from the Start’ Health Debate ‘Turned Even Nastier Yesterday’ with ‘Racial Epithets’ and ‘Sexual Slurs’” From the Tuesday, July 13 ABC World News: DIANE SAWYER: Also on politics, a controversy surrounding the Tea Party. The nation’s oldest civil rights organization, the NAACP, has just adopted a resolution this evening at its annual convention condemning quote, “racist behavior by Tea Party members.” Tonight, the   Tea Party is fighting back and here’s Dan Harris. DAN HARRIS: The NAACP points to the racial epithets allegedly hurled at black members of Congress by Tea Party members during the health care debate and to the racist signs that critics say they spotted at Tea Party events to support its conclusion that the “Tea Party movement is a threat to the pursuit of human rights, justice and equality for all.” At the group’s annual meeting in Kansas City, the resolution had plenty of support. UNIDENTIFIED MAN: When we turn on the television and see posters and fliers that send very frightening messages to our community, we have to address it. HARRIS: Tea Party favorite Sarah Palin called the resolution “divisive,” asking today on Twitter: “Are liberty-loving, equality-respecting patriots racist?” David Webb is the co-founder of the New York City Tea Party. DAVID WEBB, TEA PARTY 365: I think the NAACP, in its march towards irrelevancy as an organization, needs an enemy to maintain its power base. HARRIS, TO WEBB: Let me push you a little bit. WEBB: Sure. HARRIS, TO WEBB: We’ve all seen the signs. There have been signs that compare Baarck Obama to a monkey, there have been signs that have had the “n” word on them. When you see those signs, how do you feel? WEBB: They’re offensive. They don’t belong there, but there will always be fringe elements. HARRIS: The biggest reasons people join the Tea Party are politics and ideology, rather than views on race. But today, the NAACP rejected the charge that it’s playing politics. BENJAMIN TODD JEALOUS, PRESIDENT, NAACP: We have no problem with the Tea Party, we have a problem with the Tea Party tolerating racists in their ranks. HARRIS: This race-based fight shows no signs of letting up. The NAACP is planning an anti-Tea Party march on Washington this fall. Dan Harris, ABC News, New York.

Read more from the original source:
ABC Hypes NAACP Indictment of Tea Party as Racist, a Smear the Network Stoked