Tag Archives: office

Supreme Court Will Soon Issue a Landmark Decision on the Validity of the Constitution

The United States Supreme Court will soon issue a landmark decision on the validity of the Constitution. The Supreme Court will consider three petitions filed by William M. Windsor, a retired Atlanta, Georgia grandfather. The decision should be rendered by the end of the year. Unless The Supreme Court acts, federal judges will be free to void the Constitution. The Questions Presented to The Supreme Court by Grandfather Windsor are: Will The Supreme Court declare that the Constitution and its amendments may be voided by federal judges? Should federal judges be stopped from committing illegal and corrupt acts to obstruct justice and inflict bias on litigants? Will The Supreme Court be afraid to disclose the corruption in the federal courts? These questions are presented in three separate Petitions for Writ of Mandamus filed with The United States Supreme Court the first week of November 2010 (appeal numbers to-be-assigned). Windsor has been involved in legal action in the federal courts in Atlanta since 2006. Windsor was named a defendant in a lawsuit (1:06-CV-0714-ODE) in which Christopher Glynn of Maid of the Mist in Niagara Falls, swore under oath that Windsor did a variety of things including the crimes of theft and bribery. Windsor stated under oath that Christopher Glynn made it all up and lied about absolutely everything that he swore. Windsor then obtained deposition testimony from Glynn and the other managers of the Maid of the Mist boat ride in Niagara Falls, and they admitted, under oath, that charges against Windsor were not true. Despite this undeniable proof, federal Judge Orinda D. Evans declared that the grandfather of three should not have fought the lawsuit, and she forced him to pay over $400,000 in legal fees. Windsor appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, but federal judges Dubina, Hull, and Fay rubber-stamped Judge Evans' ruling. Windsor then took his appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court where the justices said the appeal was not worthy of their consideration (cert denied). Windsor believes that the federal courts and nine federal judges violated the Constitution, the Due Process Clause, and the First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution. Windsor says: “I have discovered that, at least in Atlanta, Georgia, the federal courts operate like a police state in which the judges are all-powerful, committing criminal acts from their benches and violating the Constitutional rights of parties who have the misfortune of appearing in their courts.” Windsor has now tossed the hot potato right square in the laps of the justices of the Supreme Court. By filing mandamus petitions rather than an appeal, The Supreme Court is forced to deal with Windsor's allegations of corruption in the federal courts. Grandfather Windsor hopes for the best but fears for the worst: “I hope The Supreme Court is decent, honest, and cares about the Constitution and the citizens of the United States. However, I am sorry to say that at this point, I suspect the corruption goes all the way to the top. My charges have been totally ignored by the United States Attorney's Office, the FBI, and Congress. I have said to The Supreme Court that the issues can all be boiled down to one question: Is The United States Supreme Court prepared to stop the federal judges in Atlanta, Georgia from functioning like common criminals?” Windsor says: “If The Supreme Court fails to act against these federal judges, the citizens of the United States need to know that there is not a shred of decency, honesty, or Constitutional rights in our federal courts. Corruption has consumed the federal court system, and we now live in a police state. Judges are free to do absolutely anything they want. Our laws are meaningless. Your life savings can be stolen by a federal judge, and they have no risk in violating every law in the books.” The Supreme Court may render its decision before the end of the year. It's one retired grandpa against the United States government. For more information, see www.LawlessAmerica.com . added by: GLOBALPOLITICAL

Manny Pacquiao Treated for Fight Injuries

Filed under: Manny Pacquiao , TMZ Sports Manny Pacquiao didn’t walk away unscathed from that championship bout after all — his people say he’s laid up in bed with injuries to his ribs and wrist. Manny’s reps just showed up at our office and told us Manny is being seen by a doctor right now at… Read more

Continue reading here:
Manny Pacquiao Treated for Fight Injuries

Left-wing ‘One Nation’ Rally Organizer Has Long History of Highly Offensive Statements – Will Media Report?

In the runup to Glenn Beck’s “Restoring Honor” rally on the National Mall last month, a number of prominent media ouetlets hyped accusations of racism targeting a small-time blogger who advised visitors to steer clear of some of the more dangerous neighborhoods in Washington. Now it has come to light that a prominent NAACP employee, Curtis Gatewood, also a “field director” for the upcoming One Nation march – organized by the NAACP and various labor unions, including the AFL-CIO and the SEIU – has made numerous anti-American and anti-Semitic statements in the past. Will the media call One Nation out for this one individual’s statements as they did the Restoring Honor rally? Will they paint this employee as representative of the rally’s attendants, also as they did with Beck’s event? Or will they ignore or downplay these statements, despite their dramatically more egregious nature? David Stein, who blogs at Yes, But, However, compiled an exhaustive list of offensive and inflammatory statements made by Gatewood, who identifies himself on his Facebook page as the Second Vice President of the North Carolina NAACP State Conference. Gatewood is also, according to this flyer , a North Carolina “field director” for the One Nation event. Among Gatewood’s more offensive remarks was this one, from a July 4 post on his Facebook page: “TO AMERICA – HAPPY 4TH OF YOU-LIE! ‘THE HOME OF THE BRAVE [or did you mean to say …OF THE ‘SLAVE?’]’; ‘THE LAND OF THE FREE [or did you mean to say .. OF THE ‘TREE’ where my ancestors were hung for recreation?]’; ‘SWEET LAND OF LIBERY’ (sic) [or did you mean to say ‘CHEATED LAND FROM BIGOTRY’? THERE WILL BE NO ‘INDEPENPENCE (sic) DAY’ until the ‘TRUTH .. MAKE YOU FREE’! MEANWHILE HAPPY YOU-LIE.” Gatewood also made numerous offensive statements about black Republicans, including calling RNC Chairman Michael Steele “HNC – Head Negro in Chains.” He also wrote the following in a letter to the editor of a local newspaper: Negroes are being rented throughout our state and country. In my opinion, the best national example of a ‘rented Negro’ is former U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell. This Negro was rented for the sole purpose of helping the incompetent and distrustful President Bush sell the world an illegal intent to violently remove Saddam Hussein from the office of Iraqi president and wrongfully invade/occupy Iraq. Now that the war is on and Colin Powell’s Negro-lease has been terminated, if Powell is seen near the White House he might be arrested. But even worst than ‘rented Negroes,’ are those Negroes such as U.S. Secretary of State Condi Rice, U.S. Supreme Court Judge Clarence (‘Uncle’) Thomas, and several thousands of other certain so-called ‘educated’ Negroes throughout the state and nation who have been bought and paid for! Even as the Supreme Court recently and rightfully ruled that the U.S. run concentration camps in Guantanamo Bay are illegal, Bush could count on his bought-and-paid-for Negroes to ‘stay the course.’ Gatewood also has a penchant for blaming catastrophic events on political decisions, policies, or individuals he does not agree with. He claimed that God “woke Americans up on 9/11” and claimed that Hurrican Katrina was “God’s scolding rebuke” for “radical Bush appointments and more disastrous/illegal policies.” Those sorts of comments usually garner heated criticism when uttered in conservative corners. Indeed, plenty of Gatewood’s comments appear to be highly offensive to left-wing sensibilities. For instance, Gatewood suggested on a North Carolina radio show that a “driving force” behind immigration to the Untied States is a desire to sell drugs to black people. Gatewood claimed that “Jews” and the Fox News Channel are trying to get Obama killed. He also channeled more run-of-the-mill left wing criticism, claiming that the Tea Party movement is “driven by the same philosophy as the KKK – ignorance and racial hatred.” At least Keith Olbermann agrees with him on that last one . In sum, Gatewood has made some astoundingly ignorant and offensive claims. I emailed him asking for comment. He replied thusly: Other than the good news of a train that is headed to Washington being driven by the engine of love, hope, equal opportunity, jobs, education and peace, I have no comment. This country no longer has the time for the divide and conquer strategies which are being desperately played by those who seek to stop the change Americans voted for. I am happily inspired by the spirit and vision of “One Nation”! Again I ask, any man, woman, or child, who seeks to “work together” in the pursuit of meaningful jobs, quality education for all children, afordable housing, love, peace, and justice for all, should seize this moment to join me and tens of thousands of others. It is time for us to let our LOVE do the talking. Enough of the debates about who is or who is not a “racist”. Let’s let our LOVE do the talking. When I asked about the vast chasm between these comments and his numerous hateful, divisive, and offensive (and occasionally racist) statements as documented on YBH, he replied simply: “Have a nice day Mr. Markay. Good try. 🙂 Thanks!” Neither the NAACP nor One Nation returned requests for comment. So will the media even mention these unbelievable statements from an official organizer of the One Nation event? Remember, many reporters seized on the seemingly innocuous advice of blogger Bruce Majors to steer clear of areas of Washington with, historically, higher crime rates. “Racism accusations fly on eve of Glenn Beck rally” blared an Associated Press headline about the reaction to Majors’s blog post. “Tea Party Blogger Accused of Racism in Beck Post” read another AP headline . Chris Matthews and Rachel Maddow pushed the meme on their respective MSNBC shows. Washington Post columnist Eugene Robinson said the post was intended to “scare white people.” And of course, lefty blogs, including the Huffington Post, Think Progress, and Talking Points Memo, were quick to paint Majors as a racist, and as representative of the larger crowd of Beck fans attending the rally. Of course we can argue all day about whether Majors’s map was rational or reasonable (I happen to live well within the area he advised visitors to steer clear of), but it should be perfectly clear that his post was comedy compared with the venomous statements made by Gatewood in recent years. And while Majors had absolutely no affiliation with Beck or his event, Gatewood is a field director for One Nation, and the vice president of the NAACP’s North Carolina conference. In other words, his views have a far greater bearing on the One Nation event than Majors’s did on the Restoring Honor rally. If One Nation comes and goes without any media chatter about Gatewood or his comments, it will demonstrate yet another double standard of which conservatives bear the brunt.

See original here:
Left-wing ‘One Nation’ Rally Organizer Has Long History of Highly Offensive Statements – Will Media Report?

Senator, Your days are numbered.

“Politicians are like diapers; they need to be changed often and for the same reason.” — Mark Twain http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/firetherulingclass#signForm In the time when our founding fathers drafted our Constitution, and created the U.S Government, they did not intend on government service to become a career. It is the purpose of this petition to be the voice of the people to limit the terms of Senators to two (12 years maximum), and Representatives to six terms (12 years maximum). (Reelections have stayed above 85% since 1965, and in 2008 are at 94%) – http://www.firetherulingclass.org/ruling.asp In March 21, 1947, the Twenty-second Amendment (Amendment XXII) was ratified, and so set limits to the office of The President…but none for anyone else. The last ratified Amendment in the constitution was in 1992, and dealt with issue of their pay raises. No such limits have been proposed, or ratified for the very people who write the laws which impact our daily lives. “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men.” -Lord Acton In a time when our nation seems so polarized by either left, or right; this one thing, I hope we all can agree upon. We do not need members in Congress or the House, who ignore the voice of the people, or who lend an ear to the highest bidder. We do not need Legislators who grow comfortable with their seat, and do all they can to latch on to it. We need leaders, representatives who heed our voice, and perform a service to the people of these United States. It is not a seat of power to be used to make oneself a fortune, but should be used to better the lives of all. I propose this be added as the 28th Amendment of the Constitution. (for the benefit of all) ” XXViii Section 1. No person shall be elected to the office of Senator more than twice, and no person who has held the office of Senator, or acted as Senator, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected Senator shall be elected to the office of Senator more than twice (two six-year terms). This article shall be retroactive when applied. Those who currently serve as Senator shall stay for the remainder of the term. Those who have served a prior, consecutive term, will not be eligible for reelection. Those who have served two or more prior consecutive terms will also be ineligible for reelection, upon ratification, and there after. Section 2. No person shall be elected to the office of Representative more than six terms (one term is for two years), and no person who has held the office of Representative, or acted as Representative, for more than eleven years of a term to which some other person was elected Representative shall be elected to the office of Representative more than six terms. This article shall be retroactive when applied. Those who currently serve as Representative shall stay for the remainder of there term. Those who have served a prior six consecutive terms, will not be eligible for reelection. ” Section 3. The terms and length of service for Senators and Representatives shall not be changed or abridged by the United States or by any State. Only a popular vote, won by no less than 85% of US Citizens shall over turn the limits. added by: mitekillem

Should a grandmother’s home be taken over a positive test for marijuana? (Updated) Examiner.com

I decided to include the full story here to clarify some confusion by readers. Please go to my link on Examiner and click follow to get future updates. Marc Anthony Laquinn Buchanan, 27, was arrested Wednesday after testing positive for marijuana use, according to court records. Buchanan was out on bond after being arrested in 2009. Buchanan's grandmother had posted the $50,000 property bond. Buchanan is awaiting trial on charges of attempted murder, first-degree assault, fleeing and evading police, possession of a handgun by a convicted felon, possession of a controlled substance and tampering with physical evidence. These charges stem from an incident where Buchanan is accused of shooting and causing “serious physical injury” to Officer Nicholas Whitcomb during a footchase. The Commonwealth Attorney's Office wants Judge Ishmael to revoke his bond. This would most likely lead to the loss of Buchanan's grandmother's home. Judge Ishmael has refused to do this and, I believe, rightly so. Mr. Buchanan stands accused but is presumed innocent until proven guilty. I don't know all of the details of the case, however, bonds are set to make sure the accused show up for their court date. I believe the bond was appropriate and efficient. The comments left after the article posted on Kentucky.com tend to disagree. http://www.kentucky.com/2010/09/23/1447397/lexington-man-charged-in-officers.htm… The issue at hand is the positive test for marijuana. Should a grandmother's home be taken because Buchanan tested positive for marijuana while awaiting pre-trial? I could argue for days about mis-information regarding marijuana. However, I'll just point out that the last thing marijuana would do is make Buchanan violent or dangerous. I'll leave it up to the comments section to debate the pros and cons of marijuana and whether or not it should be legalized. Judge Ishmael made the right decision by weighing the issues and making a calm, level-headed ruling. Buchanan knew the rules of his release, yes. Testing positive for marijuana was a violation of his release. However, did the marijuana make Buchanan dangerous or more likely to evade prosecution? No. Would justice be served by taking away the home of his grandmother? No. Would the judge be causing more pain, grief and heartache for the grandmother, family and friends of Buchanan by doing this? Yes. I tend to be critical of the Lexington courtrooms and the legal community due to past and present experience. Today, I praise Judge Ishmael for realizing that sometimes rules and laws are not written in stone. Justice is best served with a touch of wisdom. Thank you, Judge Ishmael, you've got my vote. added by: Monkey_Films

Is FACEBOOK gone for Good? FACEBOOK DOWN! down and people scramble to find meaning in their lives. UPDATE! FACEBOOK UP! but what if it happens AGAIN?

http://www.facebook.com/home.php?ref=home UPDATE FACEBOOK IS BACK ON!! Is FACEBOOK gone for Good? Facebook down and people scramble to find meaning in their lives. What will we do……..How will MILFs find love? How will you spend that extra 4hours you have at the office? How will I talk to my girlfriend in Mexico!? I MISS YOU HANNAH! added by: thelastwheeler

Matthews: GOP’s ‘Pledge to America’ is the Biggest Cover Up Since Watergate

Chris Matthews thinks the Republican Party’s Pledge to America is all part of a ploy to hide the more “radical” ideas of their party as he, on Thursday’s Hardball, announced that the GOP “manifesto” could be “the biggest cover up since Watergate.” Matthews went on to speculate that with the Pledge, the Republican members of Congress were doing their best to “disguise the much more serious, more radical proposals” of the Tea Party. The suspicious Matthews then went on to tally the allegedly secret agenda of the GOP that was “hidden under the table.” [ audio available here ] The following Matthews rants were aired on the September 23 edition of Hardball: CHRIS MATTHEWS: Plus House Republicans unveil their Pledge to America today and it could be the biggest cover up since Watergate. Their manifesto showcases all the predictable soft sell proposals you’d expect from establishment Republicans but goes radio silent on the more radical ideas of their party. The wild stuff, you know, about changing the Constitution. And make no mistake, the fringe on the right will have a strong voice if Republicans win control of the Congress. … MATTHEWS: Coming up, the Republican Party unveils its so-called Pledge to America and it may be just the biggest political cover up since Watergate. It’s a modest plan full of familiar proposals. You know the good stuff – cut taxes, cut spending, but the big question is, does it really hide or disguise the much more serious, more radical proposals that the Republicans Party has, that it has in mind. The Tea Party stuff we hear about all the time. How come that’s not on the paper? Let’s talk about what’s being covered over, in this pledge. You’re watching Hardball, only on MSNBC. … [5:13pm] MATTHEWS: Let’s take a look at what’s on the paper. Here are some of the points in the pledge, on paper. On tax cuts it calls for making the Bush tax cuts permanent. No surprise there. On business tax cuts it calls for giving small businesses a deduction equal to 20 percent of their business income. It calls for a cap on new government spending. For the repeal of the health care bill. Repeal! And fully funding, I don’t know where this came from, missile defense. Full funding of missile defense. There’s an odd one for ya…Here’s what I think is being hidden under the table. Here’s what Republicans are, actually been talking about during this campaign. Changing the 14th Amendment to that guarantees citizenship to people in this country. Let’s listen to somebody making that proposal. It’s not on the paper here. SEN. LINDSAY GRAHAM: People come here to have babies. They come here to drop a child. It’s called drop and leave. MATTHEWS: And Republicans are talking about actions that would shut down government if they take control of Congress. Let’s listen again. NEWT GINGRICH: Stage one of the end of Obama-ism will be a new Republican Congress in January that simply refuses to fund any of the radical efforts. MATTHEWS: Shut down. Some talk about repealing the 17th Amendment, which allows for direct election of U.S. senators. They’re also talking about privatizing Social Security, which is addressed in a number of places, but particularly in Republican Congressman Paul Ryan’s so-called Road Map to America’s Future. It seems to me, Todd Harris, that a lot of the nice stuff is put on this paper here, but the stuff we’re hearing out at the meetings, the Tea Party meetings, the more radical voices have been muffled here.

View original post here:
Matthews: GOP’s ‘Pledge to America’ is the Biggest Cover Up Since Watergate

CNN Hints Pope is Guilty of Mishandling Abuse Case, Leaves Out Details

CNN played an excerpt of its upcoming documentary “What the Pope Knew” on Thursday’s Newsroom (see CNN’s commercial promoting the documentary at right), and if this preview and its past coverage of the Church abuse scandal is any indication, the documentary left out key information in order to paint Benedict XVI in the worst possible light. Correspondent Gary Tuchman failed to explain how then-Cardinal Ratzinger’s handled a specific case from Wisconsin. Anchor Kyra Phillips introduced the excerpt from the documentary 24 minutes into the 9 am Eastern hour. The segment focused on the case of Father Lawrence Murphy, who was the priest and headmaster for St. John’s School for the Deaf in Milwaukee. Phillips noted that as many as 200 boys at the school were raped or sexually abused by Murphy and stated it was “one of the most notorious cases of sex abuse in the Catholic Church.” Tuchman interviewed Terry Kohut, one of Murphy’s victims. The correspondent stated that “fifty years ago, when he was just 10 years old, Terry, who is deaf, was sent to the St. John’s School in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. What happened there to Terry and up to 200 other deaf boys is now central to the sex abuse crisis in the Catholic Church, and to the question of what Pope Benedict, then Cardinal Ratzinger, knew about it all.” This introduction gives the false impression that Ratzinger was a cardinal five decades ago, when he actually was a priest and college professor in Germany during the 1960s. After playing the first clip from his interview of Kohut, Tuchman continued that “Father Murphy has…been identified by dozens of deaf men who say he raped and sexually abused them as children for years. Father Murphy’s abuse would come to the direct attention of Cardinal Ratzinger, but his handling of the case would stun Murphy’s victims.” The CNN correspondent didn’t explain the then-cardinal’s handling (perhaps an explanation is given in the larger documentary), but only played a sound bite from David Gibson of the PoliticsDaily blog, who back in April 2008, at the time of the Pope’s visit to the U.S., accused Benedict XVI of irresponsibly exercising his office as pope . Gibson made a new accusation in his clip: “I think what the Murphy case shows is the d eference that Cardinal Ratzinger and Pope Benedict would always give to the priest .” Actually, then-Cardinal Ratzinger involvement in the Murphy case was minimal at best. Father Thomas Brundage of the Archdiocese of Milwaukee rebuked the New York Times and other media outlets earlier in 2010 for their sloppy reporting on the Murphy case. Fr. Brundage, who presided over Murphy’s canonical/church trial, stated that he had ” never once been contacted by any news organization for comment .” He also noted that he had ” no reason to believe that he [Cardinal Ratzinger] was involved at all . Placing this matter at his doorstep is a huge leap of logic and information .” Jimmy Akin of the National Catholic Register reported on April 5, 2010 that the Congregation of the Doctrine of Faith (CDF), the Church body which Cardinal Ratzinger led before coming pope, held a meeting on the Murphy case in 1998. Ratzinger wasn’t even present at this meeting, which was led by his deputy, then-Archbishop Tarcisio Bertone. According to a memo from that meeting, Archbishop Bertone was ” appalled at how long this case [had] been allowed to linger .” Akin also explained that “the reason that the CDF was involved in this case is that it involved a priest accused of sexual solicitation in the confessional—not because it involved paedophilia. At the time, the CDF did not have a mandate to cover paedophilia (those were normally handled by the local bishop or, if appealed to Rome, by a different Vatican court—the Roman Rota).” The Register writer concluded that “[o]ne can still criticize the way the CDF handled the case, but the memo does not reveal a portrait of Bertone—much less Ratzinger—as unwilling to take action against Fr. Murphy .” At the end of his report, Tuchman asked Kohut why he was participating in the lawsuit. His answer: “I want the see the Vatican- because I’ve been waiting for all these years for them to excommunicate- defrock Father Murphy, but they haven’t.” Murphy died in 1998 , and as Father Brundage explained in his response to the New York Times, ” he was still the defendant in a church criminal trial ” at the time of his death. Defrocking or excommunicating the now deceased priest seems like a moot point. On May 3, 2010, Tuchman gave a report on Anderson Cooper 360 which tried to cast the Pope in the worst light possible regarding another abuse case, and omitted key details in that instance as well. This kind of slanted coverage is not at all surprising, given how CNN has run such reports on the abuse scandals since March 2010. On March 26 , Phillips used the scandal as a pretext to bring on three left-wing/heterodox Christians who all advocate radical changes inside the Catholic Church. She even gave their agenda her endorsement. On April 16, correspondent Jessica Yellin misleadingly asked , ” Why is he [Pope Benedict] having such a hard time saying he’s sorry? ” Phillips herself went further on June 11, stating that “we haven’t heard” the Pope say he’s sorry for the scandals. The full transcript of the segment from Thursday’s Newsroom: KYRA PHILLIPS: At a small school for the deaf in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, as many as 200 deaf boys were raped or sexually abused by the priest and headmaster. It was one of the most notorious cases of sex abuse in the Catholic Church. Today, a CNN exclusive: the first interview with one of those victims, who’s now suing Pope Benedict. It’s part of a special CNN documentary examining what Pope Benedict did or didn’t do about this crisis. Our Gary Tuchman has the story. GARY TUCHMAN (voice-over): At a lakeside retreat in northern Wisconsin- KOHUT (to dog): Come. TUCHMAN (voice-over): Terry Kohut tries to escape his past. It isn’t easy. Fifty years ago, when he was just 10 years old, Terry, who is deaf, was sent to the St. John’s School in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. What happened there to Terry and up to 200 other deaf boys is now central to the sex abuse crisis in the Catholic Church, and to the question of what Pope Benedict, then Cardinal Ratzinger, knew about it all. Terry Kohut has never spoken publicly about the horrors he endured at St. John’s. Until now. TUCHMAN (on-camera): What did he do to you? KOHUT (through translator): And then it was that afternoon, I went into his office. The door was closed, and Father Murphy said, ‘Take your pants down.’ TUCHMAN (voice-over): Father Lawrence Murphy was the headmaster and priest at St. John’s for more than two decades. He was a charismatic fundraiser and respected church leader. But Father Murphy has also been identified by dozens of deaf men who say he raped and sexually abused them as children for years. Father Murphy’s abuse would come to the direct attention of Cardinal Ratzinger, but his handling of the case would stun Murphy’s victims. DAVID GIBSON, POLITICSDAILY.COM: I think what the Murphy case shows is the deference that Cardinal Ratzinger and Pope Benedict would always give to the priest. UNIDENTIFIED MALE: What actually happens in court- TUCHMAN (voice-over): Today, Terry Kohut is suing the Vatican for what Father Murphy did to him at St. John’s. His lawsuit is the first to ever specifically name Joseph Ratzinger, now Pope Benedict. Until now, Terry Kohut has been anonymous, named only as John Doe 16. KOHUT (through translator): Yeah, I was confused as to why it was happening. I mean, he was a priest. You know, I was trying to figure out what- I mean, I can’t believe a priest would do that. THUCHMAN (voice-over): The priest is believed to have picked out victims who were especially vulnerable, or had been through tragedy already in their young lives. Terry Kohut fit that pattern. KOHUT (through translator): My brother was electrocuted- died when I was 10. And when I was 11, my father hung himself. And at 12, my favorite dog died, and it tore me up. And I saw Father Murphy, and I thought that he could be a second father. TUCHMAN (on camera): Tell me why, Terry, you’ve decided to file suit- what do you want to see happen? KOHUT (through translator): I want the see the Vatican- because I’ve been waiting for all these years for them to excommunicate- defrock Father Murphy, but they haven’t.

Link:
CNN Hints Pope is Guilty of Mishandling Abuse Case, Leaves Out Details

Bruno Mars Arrest Was Over Alleged Cocaine Possession

Police say singer/songwriter had 2.6 grams of white powder on him at time of arrest. By Gil Kaufman Bruno Mars in Las Vegas Police custody Photo: LVPD More details have emerged about what led to singer/songwriter Bruno Mars ‘ arrest early Sunday morning in Las Vegas on drug-possession charges. According to a copy of the arrest document provided by the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, the “Just the Way You Are” singer was arrested around 1:50 a.m. at the Hard Rock Hotel and Casino — where he had performed earlier in the night — for felony possession of 2.6 grams of a “white powdery substance” that tested positive as cocaine. Mars (born Peter Gene Hernandez), 23, was taken in after Las Vegas police received a narcotics call from someone at the Hard Rock. According to the report, a bathroom attendant approached a security officer at the facility to say that there was a man in a bathroom stall who might be using drugs, telling the guard that a male in the bathroom was “taking a really long time.” The attendant said he observed the suspect in a striped shirt with a “baggy of white powder substance.” The attendant and the security guard approached the suspect as he exited the stall, and the guard ordered Mars to hand over whatever narcotics he had on him. “This is when Hernandez, with his left hand, pulled out a white powder substance, which was consistent with cocaine, from his left-front jeans pocket.” When the guard asked Mars if he knew why he was being detained, the singer reportedly said, “Can I speak to you honestly, sir?” and then said he “did a foolish thing and has never used drugs before.” Mars was arrested when the substance tested positive for cocaine, and he was then transported to the Clark County Detention Center, where he was booked on a felony charge of possession of a controlled substance. A spokesperson for the Clark County District Attorney’s Office said in a statement that the case against Mars is still under review and that no charges have been filed yet. He was released from custody at 7:45 a.m. Sunday and has been ordered to return to court for his arraignment November 18. A spokesperson for Mars’ label had not released a statement on the incident at press time. Related Artists Bruno Mars

More here:
Bruno Mars Arrest Was Over Alleged Cocaine Possession

Is ‘The Town’ Oscar-Bound After Box-Office Win?

Brisk ticket sales, critical buzz make Ben Affleck’s Boston drama an Oscar hopeful. By Eric Ditzian Slaine, Ben Affleck, Jeremy Renner and Owen Burke in “The Town” Photo: Warner Bros. “The Town” floated out of the Venice Film Festival on a cloud of Oscar buzz, and heading into the weekend, most box-office prognosticators expected Ben Affleck’s drama to win the #1 spot. But who could have predicted that “The Town” would net $23.5 million , a September record for Warner Bros.? Now there’s no doubting that the guy who once starred in “Gigli” and “Jersey Girl” has a serious Oscar hopeful on his hands. “Typically September releases turn out to be Oscar frauds,” said Jeff Bock, box-office analyst for Exhibitor Relations. “Not so with ‘The Town,’ as it has the reviews and b.o. to not only talk the talk, but walk the walk. Being #1 at the box office always helps the cause of any film, as it garners massive amounts of media attention.” Affleck’s Boston bank-robber tale is not only a contender for one of the 10 Best Picture nominations, but could land a nod in an acting category as well. “Either Jon Hamm or Jeremy Renner could easily end up in the Supporting Actor category,” said BoxOffice.com editor Phil Contrino, citing the film’s robust ticket sales. Another Boston-centric crime drama, “The Departed,” opened to similar numbers and critical acclaim in 2006. The Martin Scorsese film eventually nabbed five Oscar nominations, including Mark Wahlberg’s nod for Supporting Actor, and won four of them (including Best Picture and Best Director). Few would argue that Affleck’s movie will mirror the awards-season success of Scorsese’s, but as Contrino notes, “The Academy has a history of rewarding crime flicks that catch on in a major way and ultimately transcend their genre.” Oscar chances aside, what’s most remarkable about “The Town” is the fact that it made so much money with stars not nearly as high-profile as the ones in “Departed.” “Affleck, Renner and Hamm are certainly no [Leonardo] DiCaprio, [Jack] Nicholson, and [Matt] Damon,” Bock said. “That’s why the debut of ‘The Town’ is all the more impressive. Affleck achieved this opening on concept, not star power, which is becoming increasingly more potent in Hollywood of late.” Much credit is due to Warners’ marketing machine, which went to great lengths in TV ads to position “The Town” as more genre thriller than critical darling. “The ads punched up the proceedings by making the picture look (not just sound) like ‘The Departed’ and by using the Eminem song ‘Not Afraid,’ ” noted Brandon Gray of Box Office Mojo . Box-office success, of course, is not always a requirement for Oscar love. Just look at “The Hurt Locker,” which won Best Picture over “Avatar” this year despite an anemic box-office showing. When the new nominations arrive early next year, we should expect a similar grouping of “Hurt Locker”-style small fare and “Avatar”-esque blockbusters. “With 10 nominations for Best Picture, more than ever there are opportunities for smaller films and major blockbusters to be in the mix. One of those films is ‘Inception,’ which is a shoo-in for a Best Picture [nod],” Bock said. “This year we will see a mix of both types of films, but odds are, we won’t have a smaller film win the award two years in a row, since it’s never happened before ‘The Hurt Locker.’ ” Check out everything we’ve got on “The Town.” For breaking news, celebrity columns, humor and more — updated around the clock — visit MTVMoviesBlog.com . Related Videos MTV Rough Cut: The Town

The rest is here:
Is ‘The Town’ Oscar-Bound After Box-Office Win?