Tag Archives: oscar

Janeane Garofalo Has No Oscar Picks

http://www.youtube.com/v/LtQIw-5vdzE?version=3&f=user_uploads&app=youtube_gdata

Just leaving her off-Broadway production, ‘Russian Transport’, Janeane Garofalo drops the bomb that girlfriend ain’t got no Oscar picks.

See more here:

Janeane Garofalo Has No Oscar Picks

Oscar Index: The Beginning of the End

There’s good news and bad news to begin this post-nomination , next-to-next-to-next-to-next-to-last installment of Oscar Index. The good news? It’s kind of almost over! The bad news? Oy. Please don’t make me repeat it. The laurel-sniffing wonks at Movieline’s Institute for the Advanced Study of Kudos Forensics went 27 for 34 predicting its regular, top six categories, which means that the Academy basically tossed in a “surprise” every fifth nomination or so — though specialists at the MIASKF technically refuse to classify anything that was on last week’s charts as a “surprise.” So basically, if it’s not all two nominations for The Daldry , then you probably should have seen it coming. Which you did. As such, we resume the Sisyphean torment of our Oscar-addled eternities, pushing boulders that look and feel suspiciously like crystal balls up hills that look and feel vaguely like the bones of 84 years’ worth of snubs. What does it all mean? To the Index! The Final 9: 1. The Artist 2. The Descendants 3. The Help 4. Midnight in Paris 5. Hugo 6. Moneyball 7. War Horse 8. The Daldry 9. The Tree of Life My favorite parts of nomination morning — apart from the Lucasfilm plant who yelped, ” Red Tails ! Gotta be Red Tails ” as Al Roker informally polled Today Show tourists about their Best Picture predictions — were the peals of ecstasy that greeted The Daldry ‘s announcement among the year’s nine Picture nominees. It sounded like a dog clamping down on a chew toy made of publicists. Other nominations elicited vaguely similar reactions, but that was The Reaction, as if to underscore just how desperately all the parties of all the films involved had chased this singular recognition, and how favorably the Academy regards its most dogged pursers. That’s nothing new, of course. But for a film that has both critics and audiences on record as utterly disinterested (at best) to find 5 percent of the voting body — around 270 people or so — necessary to call it the Best Picture of 2011 ? That’s just fundamentally fucked up. It literally doesn’t make sense . It’s one thing to look back and deduce how a film like, say, Crash actually wins Best Picture (e.g. through vote splitting among other nominees). It’s another thing to look at this year’s nine nominees — loaded with the range of critical and commercial (to say nothing of self-referential ) successes we’ve been accustomed to forecasting as the Academy’s favorites for generations now — and comprehend the basic qualifications of this group to recommend anything more than what this producer or that studio commanded them to acknowledge. Again: So what, right? C’est la Oscar ! Indeed, anyone who’s been doing this a while is accustomed to being vexed, perplexed, bemused, confused, shocked, rocked and baffled. But I’m not only not used to battling the undertow of cynicism so early in the season, I’m also not used to the Academy so obviously stirring such malevolence in audiences. Forget about the press: We’re just as insular and aloof and susceptible to influence as the Academy is. I’m thinking of ordinary viewers now — people who, for better or worse, look to the Academy as tastemakers and who now have a squealing clique of flacks to thank for steering them and their money toward shameless, reconstituted Oscar bait like The Daldry . The ordinary viewer doesn’t know that this film wasn’t made for him or her, but rather for 5 percent of an audience of 6,000 “industry professionals” sought to anoint it as “Oscar-nominated.” The ordinary viewer may never learn more about such provocative, sincere brilliance as Melancholia or Take Shelter , or the disgracefully buried Margaret , or the delicate jewel that is Bill Cunningham New York (which the Documentary Branch, in all its lobotomized glory, naturally snubbed), all because they couldn’t compete with The Daldry ‘s more moneyed, seasonal “greatness.” The ordinary viewer doesn’t notice the handiwork of Scott Rudin’s cabal of mercenary Oscar ninjas, star-flinging sharpshooters laboring on The Daldry ‘s behalf. But God willing, the ordinary viewer heard that sound in the back of the Samuel Goldwyn Theater on Tuesday morning and recognized its quivering evil as the alarm it was. Apart from that? Congrats, to the Tree of Life team, I guess? And don’t count out The Descendants , or something . Whatever: Everyone’s going to kissing Harvey Weinstein’s ring again when they lose to the recent PGA Award-winner The Artist , so… yeah. At least we have the Super Bowl to look forward to. The Final 5: 1. Michel Hazanavicius, The Artist 2. Martin Scorsese, Hugo 3. Alexander Payne, The Descendants 4. Woody Allen, Midnight in Paris 5. Terrence Malick, The Tree of Life Scorsese leapfrogged Payne thanks to 11 nominations for Hugo — and he may not be done there, depending on how warmly sad Academy lifers receive a front-runner whose name their president, Tom Sherak, couldn’t be bothered to pronounce correctly Tuesday morning. Though Sherak screwed up “Score-say-zee”‘s name, too, so who knows? “Malick” rolls off the tongue, no? Let’s surprise him and find out. The Final 5: 1. (tie) Meryl Streep, The Iron Lady 1. (tie) Viola Davis, The Help 3. Michelle Williams, My Week With Marilyn 4. Rooney Mara, The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo 5. Glenn Close, Albert Nobbs Poor Tilda Swinton, another casualty of the Academy’s 2012 shocking kamikaze quest for mediocrity. Glenn Close evidently tends to bring that out in the actors’ branch. Who knew? We’ll always have Rooney, I suppose. Anyway, when I or anyone else have a little clearer read on who’s where in the top two, the Index will reflect it. But right now it’s basically a bunch of Oscar pundits shrugging and staggering out of happy hours in New York and L.A., hiccuping deep revelations like, “Awwww, man, they don’t make Best Actresses like Halle Berry anymore, those were the days,” and “I wonder if chairs at the Kodak Theater talk to each other… What would they [PUUUUKKEEEE]…”, etc. etc. The Leading 5: 1. [tie] Jean Dujardin, The Artist 2. [tie] George Clooney, The Descendants 3. Brad Pitt, Moneyball 4. Gary Oldman, Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy 5. Demi

Oscar 2012 Nominations: Biggest Snubs And Surprises

‘Harry Potter,’ Albert Brooks passed over, while Gary Oldman finally gets his due. By Kevin P. Sullivan Melissa McCarthy in “Bridesmaids” Photo: Universal We now have the answer to one of awards season’s biggest questions: We know who has been nominated for the 2012 Academy Awards . All we need to know now is who wins. This year’s Oscar nominations didn’t offer any enormous surprises, but a few of the snubs have some people gasping. Right off the bat, it must be addressed. Albert Brooks was not nominated for his delightfully evil turn in “Drive.” Both Brooks and the film have a passionate following, so Max von Sydow’s nomination for “Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close” over Brooks can’t come as welcome news for the movie’s many fans. Brooks hilariously responded to the snub over Twitter, saying, “I got ROBBED. I don’t mean the Oscars, I mean literally. My pants and shoes have been stolen.” That’s it, Al. Kill them with laughter. But let’s not focus on the negative. A great injustice was righted with the nominations. Gary Oldman’s nod for “Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy” didn’t come as a complete surprise, but it was a welcome one. Shockingly, the famed British actor had never been nominated before now. After decades of memorable characters, Oldman has finally gotten his due. He and the Best Actor category’s other surprise, Demi

Oscar 2012 Predictions: Best Actor

‘Descendants’ star George Clooney and ‘Artist’ actor Jean Dujardin are two of MTV News’ nominee picks. By Josh Wigler George Clooney in “The Descendants” Photo: 20th Century Fox In less than 24 hours, five actors will find themselves officially locked in on the road toward Oscar glory. The 2012 Academy Award nominations are set to be unleashed on Tuesday, and while there are certainly some expected front-runners who will be in the mix, there are always surprise nominees who make the cut. In the Best Actor category, however, things seem a bit more predictable this year. A handful of performers have found their names repeatedly honored with nominations throughout the current awards season and the trend isn’t likely to stop before Oscar night . From bureaus to baseball, from silence to sex, here are our predictions for the Academy Awards’ Best Actor nominees. George Clooney, “The Descendants” Already familiar with the taste of Oscar gold, Clooney is very likely on the cusp of another major win for his touching turn as “back-up parent” Matt King in Alexander Payne’s “The Descendants.” Clooney has been on an Academy-attracting hot streak in recent years, what with nominations for “Michael Clayton” and “Up in the Air.” Under the right circumstances, he could have easily claimed victories for either of those roles. Will he find himself in the right crowd this time around? Leonardo DiCaprio, “J. Edgar” Critics were not kind to director Clint Eastwood’s biopic about the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s polarizing founder. But DiCaprio’s performance as the titular J. Edgar Hoover is another story. The three-time Oscar nominee turned in a transformative performance as Hoover, both physically and spiritually, and is likely to be recognized with a fourth nomination, if not a win. Jean Dujardin, “The Artist” It’s said that silence is acceptance. If that’s the case, French actor Jean Dujardin could well be accepting a Best Actor award on Oscar night. As the star of director Michel Hazanavicius’ silent film “The Artist,” Dujardin proved the old adage that a picture is worth a thousand words — in his case, moving pictures — as he stole the hearts of art-house moviegoers everywhere as George Valentin, a silent-movie actor facing the very real threat of falling from stardom to redundancy. Michael Fassbender, “Shame” Talk about baring it all! Fassbender truly shed every layer possible — and we do mean every layer — as sex addict Brandon Sullivan in director Steve McQueen’s “Shame.” It’s not easy for the star of an NC-17 film to cross over to the awards-season elite, but Fassbender has done exactly that, most notably with his Golden Globe nomination for Best Actor. While he’s not likely to win — a true shame, if you ask us — his inclusion on Oscar night feels like the climax, if you will, of the Irish-German actor’s truly inspired 2011. Brad Pitt, “Moneyball” After the shutdown of Steven Soderbegh’s take on the material, a rewrite from Oscar-winning screenwriter Aaron Sorkin and the surprise hiring of Jonah Hill in his first dramatic role, “Moneyball” surprised everybody by simply existing. Unsurprising is the fantastic performance from Pitt, one of our most gifted (and gorgeous) actors. Pitt has yet to bring an Oscar home, despite numerous nominations over the years. His Billy Beane might be the most understated of all the characters likely to enter the Best Actor field this year, but true to the Oakland A’s general manager’s philosophy, it’s not always a grand slam that gets you the win. Share your predictions for Oscar’s Best Actor nominees in the comments below! Stick with MTV News as we cover the 2012 Oscar nominations — and snubs — on Tuesday, January 24! For breaking news, celebrity columns, humor and more — updated around the clock — visit MTVMoviesBlog.com .

More here:
Oscar 2012 Predictions: Best Actor

The Movie That Makes Uggie Cry (No, Really)

Here is a video featuring Artist wonder dog and awards-season gadabout Uggie telling viewers what movie made him cry and offering some insights on his Oscar chances. Some guy named George Clooney is in it, too. Did I mention that it’s Friday ? [ W Magazine via PeoplePets ]

Continued here:
The Movie That Makes Uggie Cry (No, Really)

Oscar Index: Left Out in the Gold

Smack in the middle of a two-week frame yielding two awards shows and a pair of nomination announcements that will culminate in this year’s Oscar nods, the researchers at Movieline’s Institute for the Advanced Study of Kudos Forensics have gained minimal insight into where the Academy may take the 2011-12 awards race in next Tuesday’s final nominations. Or maybe they’re all just sleeping. It’s been that kind of year. Let’s check their work in this week’s Oscar Index. The Leading 10: 1. The Artist 2. The Descendants 3. The Help 4. Midnight in Paris 5. Hugo 6. Moneyball 7. War Horse 8. The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo 9. Bridesmaids 10. The Tree of Life Outsiders: The Ides of March ; Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy ; Drive Regardless of their volume and putative weight, let’s try an experiment: Let’s not belabor the developments of the last week. Let’s look past the all-star rosters and scattered surprises at the Critics Choice Movie Awards , Golden Globe Awards and among this week’s BAFTA Award nominations , and let’s forget how real I was telling you it all began to feel a week ago. Let’s instead make quick work of key points about a race that is fundamentally down to two films vying for a Best Picture Oscar and maybe one or two others vying for the privilege of being considered alongside them. Academy nomination ballots are being counted as we speak; by this time next week we’ll be talking not about what should or shouldn’t be considered but rather about what a film with 11 nominations has going for it over a film with nine nominations. And all this bullshit about heat meters and gold derbies and even Oscar Indices will tumble through the cracks of new white noise telling how imperfect the whole system is, and what winning has to do with justice, and why do we care, and so on and so forth until the last for-your-consideration ad is sold and the last fleck of vomit is scrubbed from the leather banquettes that got the very worst of the Oscar-night after-after-after-after parties. Let’s concede that this is the part of the race where we all forgo our last remaining illusions of pure aesthetic combat, turning instead to the customary sight of fine-tuned cogs endeavoring to spin faster and faster still — The Weinstein Company with its Artist , Fox Searchlight with its Descendants — coaxing the parts around them into specialized lurches, as affecting as interchangeable porcelain ballerinas and lilting lullabies set into action by two greasy, handwound parts. Can The Help move any faster than it has all season, with its phenomenal box-office days behind it and actresses setting the pace of their own categories? Can Hugo survive the ever-escalating altitude of its nostalgia? Can Midnight in Paris pivot successfully out of the nostalgia trap, and if so, will a complacent Academy votership simply shy away, thinking, “Oh, too bad, this one’s broken”? Can Moneyball or Dragon Tattoo , with all their sinewy, contemporary fierceness, fly low and slow enough to ever be seen by the birdwatchers otherwise known as AMPAS? Can Bridesmaids find the groundswell it will require to even crack the Best Picture class, let alone compete within it? Let’s then concede that our individual answers are all that’s left of a process that only two weeks ago teased us with the prospect of intrigue , and that when the Academy reflects our old intrigues back to us, we will betray them as we always do with new intrigues are no one else’s (e.g. “This is more easy emotional default old-fart consensus thinking …”, ” The Adventures Of Tintin might seem a surprise over favored Rango , but the latter is probably too American for the foreign group …”) And then let’s keep it going for another month of posturing on all sides, guided by the same inexorable pieces at the heart of the same inexhaustible machine. Anyway, this is as good a read as I can get on the situation headed into Nominee Tuesday, which gives you an indication of how ridiculous this whole folly is from week to week. I say we’ll get eight Best Picture nods total, in the order listed above. Wagering on this prediction would be a bad idea — unless you win, I guess, in which case you’d better cut your old pal STV in. The Leading 5: 1. Michel Hazanavicius, The Artist 2. Alexander Payne, The Descendants 3. Martin Scorsese, Hugo 4. Woody Allen, Midnight in Paris 5. Steven Spielberg, War Horse Outsiders : David Fincher, The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo ; Bennett Miller, Moneyball ; Tate Taylor, The Help ; Nicolas Winding Refn, Drive Scorsese has been a nomination lock for weeks now, but claiming Best Director at the Globes was one of the rarer glints of HFPA influence on the Oscar race. On the one hand, Harvey Weinstein was able to wrangle an Oscar for a relatively unknown Tom Hooper last year over Fincher et. al., so doing the same for Hazanavicius shouldn’t be perceived as too difficult. On the other hand, Scott Feinberg notes the Academy’s historical Best Director quirk: History tells us that Academy members rarely back different films for best picture and best director, respectively, which would benefit The Artist , which seems to be the more beloved film. But we also know that “splits” do sometimes happen, and the example set by the HFPA of “spreading love all around” might appeal to some Academy members who love The Artist but would rather back a director with a long track record than someone who now has only one American feature film under his belt. Obviously Payne shouldn’t be ignored in this context, either, but Scorsese gets the week’s big bump. Fincher is coming around behind the scenes as well; Sony pushed hard last week as resistance to the Dragon Tattoo -slump non-story built around the Academy. We’ll see what that’s worth against the last ounces of Spielberg’s pre-nomination muscle. The Leading 5: 1. (tie) Meryl Streep, The Iron Lady 1. (tie) Viola Davis, The Help 3. Michelle Williams, My Week With Marilyn 4. Tilda Swinton, We Need to Talk About Kevin 5. Rooney Mara, The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo Outsiders : Glenn Close, Albert Nobbs ; Charlize Theron, Young Adult ; Elizabeth Olsen, Martha Marcy May Marlene Not even the boldest pundit would yet dare to choose a Best Actress favorite after the week we just had, with winner Davis dazzling the Critics Choice crowd and Streep giving it her own best acceptance-speech shot at the Golden Globes. And what of Michelle Williams, whose provocative GQ photo spread prompted Sasha Stone to observe : “There is a school of thought where Oscar is concerned that goes like this: You can win if you can give them rock hard erections.” Yowza! So much for the L.A. Times ‘s hilarious awards-season “Heat Meter” — what we need around here is a meat heater . Amirite? OK, don’t answer that. The Leading 5: 1. Jean Dujardin, The Artist 2. Brad Pitt, Moneyball 3. George Clooney, The Descendants 4. Michael Fassbender, Shame 5. Gary Oldman, Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy Outsiders : Demi

Finally, a Critic Who Really Gets The Iron Lady

Spoiler alert? “I’d be remiss if I didn’t mention the preoccupation the director shows with Maggie’s shoes. There are so many shoe-shots in the film, it’s downright laughable. When she leaves number 10 for the last time, the shot lingers long enough on Streep’s walking feet it made me wonder if there was a shoe fetishist behind the camera. She wasn’t Imelda Marcos, after all. And the final scene of the movie: Maggie washes out her teacup in the sink. How tragic! Nah-nah-nah-nah-nah! The filmmakers could not resist that final, petty, hate-filled blow.” [ Big Hollywood ]

See the rest here:
Finally, a Critic Who Really Gets The Iron Lady

Golden Globe Winner Octavia Spencer is So Over the ‘Sassy Black Woman’ Parts

Now that Golden Globe winner Octavia Spencer ‘s sitting pretty with her Best Supporting Actress trophy, the L.A. Times breaks out a choice quote from an October visit to the set of her Sundance 2012 pic Smashed : “You do a movie like [ The Help ] to get a movie like this,” she said of her new film, which sees her go from spitting retorts and baking special pies as The Help ‘s Minny to helping Mary Elizabeth Winstead battle alcoholism. “It’s nice… to play roles when I’m not just a sassy black woman.” Hear, hear. Now let’s get Spencer the Oscar , already. [ LAT ]

Read the rest here:
Golden Globe Winner Octavia Spencer is So Over the ‘Sassy Black Woman’ Parts

Megan Fox vs. Lindsay Lohan: Who’d You Rather (Play Liz Taylor)?

Last week came news that perennial problem starlet Lindsay Lohan was in talks to play screen icon Elizabeth Taylor in Lifetime’s Liz and Dick biopic, which would mark some sort of career rejuvenation for the troubled La Lohan. But wait! It seems other actresses are also up for the role, including Transformers / Passion Play star Megan Fox . E! uncovered the role rivalry last weekend when the film’s executive producer, Larry Thompson, let spill that he’s “in conversations” with more than just Lohan, whose ongoing legal woes may complicate production, set to begin in the spring. “I’ve been talking to Lindsay Lohan directly, and with her reps,” he said, “and have been in conversations with other actresses, including Megan Fox.” But lest you think Thompson isn’t taking this casting bit seriously enough or is hedging his bets against Lohan, he really set the record straight about this Lifetime original movie film. “It’s a very serious selection. It’s like casting for Hollywood royalty.” Fox may have the natural dark-haired loveliness of Taylor over Lohan, but Lohan — despite films like I Know Who Killed Me and that one where she got pregnant and went straight to DVD — has demonstrated far better acting chops. I can’t believe we’re actually considering a future where either Megan Fox or Lindsay Lohan are going to play Elizabeth Taylor for a TV movie, so maybe it doesn’t even really matter. Anyways. With the Liz casting seemingly up in the air, chime in: Who should get the gig? • Lindsay Lohan, Look Out: Megan Fox Also in Talks to Play Elizabeth Taylor [E!]

Read the original:
Megan Fox vs. Lindsay Lohan: Who’d You Rather (Play Liz Taylor)?

Will This Sexy Magazine Cover Land Michelle Williams an Oscar?

Over at Awards Daily, Sasha Stone forwards an interesting theory : “There is a school of thought where Oscar is concerned that goes like this: You can win if you can give them rock hard erections.” The latest in said awards trend, it would seem, is the February cover spread in GQ in which My Week with Marilyn ‘s Michelle Williams poses in lingerie as the magazine’s headline screams “Who Knew Michelle Williams Had This Body?” It’s a far cry from Williams’ perpetual pixie-mom persona, the one she broke out in her Golden Globe acceptance speech last weekend. But is her skin-baring the key to getting that coveted Oscar nomination/win ? Behold the press-shy Williams with a pseudo-Marilyn bedroom coif, selling sex with the vulnerable eyes of a deer. A very sexy deer, mind you (images via Just Jared ): Now, the PR move prompts a few questions: Is this really a historic, proven trend among female Oscar nominees? (See: Kate Winslet ‘s nude Vanity Fair spread, evidence in Stone’s theory, which may or may not have helped convince Oscar voters that her turn in The Reader was worth honoring.) Why won’t Meryl Streep (or Viola Davis, as Stone notes) take the same tack? And how far does a spread focusing on Williams’ sexiness and bare body help further the sentiment that she’s a great actress who turned in one of the best performances of the year? (Have the GQ readers who’d bite at this headline even seen My Week with Marilyn ?) I’m partly skeptical because the GQ cover isn’t particularly great, taking nothing away from Williams’ loveliness. My favorite image of the bunch above is the mirror shot, which allows that great face to convey real vulnerability and fragility — as if Williams had a moment of clarity, standing in front of a photographer in her see-through nightie, realizing that life as a would-be Oscar honoree on the campaign trail isn’t so wildly different from that of the doomed Monroe, compulsively and self-consciously putting on a pout for the cameras. Yes, sex sells. But does it really win Oscars? We shall see… [ To clarify: The Oscar nominations are announced Jan. 24; member voting closes Feb. 21. ] [ Awards Daily , Just Jared ]

Read this article:
Will This Sexy Magazine Cover Land Michelle Williams an Oscar?