Tag Archives: party

Michelle Obama Kicks It Euro-style While Americans, and Barack Obama, Watch

The press won’t go there because, well, they love President Barack Obama and this story, accurately reported, is painful. I haven’t gone there because I don’t really care what’s going on between President Obama and his wife. President Clinton defiling the Oval office concerned me because his actions were a big f-u to the American people and showed blatant disrespect to the office and the country. Michelle being pissed off at Barack Obama? Eh, who isn’t? Also, Michelle being a petty, selfish woman? Also not news. If reports are to be believed, Michelle Obama is the reason America has the shining tower of intelligence Joe Biden instead of Hillary Clinton. Petty. They’re two of a kind. Still and all, this story has become more newsworthy as the scope and cost of Michelle’s trip to Europe has dribbled out.  Mickey Kaus says: So Michelle Obama vacations in Spain with her daughter and a huge posse, leaving her husband  alone on his birthday  and undermining his party’s political chances ( bad recession ‘optics’ ). This is the sort of story on which I suspect there are three levels of perception: 1. Unsophisticated : Jeez, they must have had some kind of fight. She’s pissed! This is a big ‘screw you.’ 2. Sophisticated and well informed:  At their level everyone is too smart and experienced to let any kind of spat affect state affairs. These things get planned out well ahead of time by staff. Only the unsophisticated jump to conclusions on the basis of crude external appearances. 3. Real Insider:  Jeez, they must have had some kind of fight. She’s pissed! This is a big ‘screw you.’ Ha! Well, though no one would say it, this was a big “screw you” to the president. Turns out, it was a big screw you to the American Taxpayer, too. From the  Seattle Times  that emphasizes (of course!) the private nature of the trip and that Michelle Obama will pay back some of the cost: The opulence of the European trip also has drawn scrutiny. Michelle Obama is staying at the Hotel Villa Padierna, a Ritz-Carlton resort in the mountains outside Marbella. The resort has two golf courses, a posh spa with Turkish baths, views of the Mediterranean Sea and a high-end restaurant specializing in avant-garde fare. Room rates start at $400 and rise to $6,500 for a two-bedroom villa with a private pool and 24-hour butler service. While her friends arrived in Spain on their own, Michelle Obama flew in on a type of aircraft also used by Vice President Joseph Biden. It costs the government $11,555 an hour to operate the plane, according to the Air Force. Assuming a nearly eight-hour flight to nearby Málaga, the total round-trip cost of the flight is about  $178,000 . Anita McBride, who was chief of staff to former first lady Laura Bush, was not surprised the trip has its critics. “When you are a public figure, it can be difficult to lead a private life. Despite the fact that much of this trip is paid for personally, the American people know that there are costs borne by the taxpayers and it’s to be expected that the more expensive the trip, the greater the risk of criticism,” McBride said. The optics are so bad, even Democrat (and Journolista?)  Kirsten Powers calls this a “Foolish Trip” : Some argue that Michelle should be able to travel wherever she wants if she’s paying for it herself. This is naive. She is the first lady at a time when Americans are experiencing great economic pain. There are endless great locations here at home that she could put on the map with a visit – American hotels and restaurants that would be grateful for the business generated by such a high-profile visitor. If it’s a huge sacrifice for her, so be it. Sacrifice is actually a noble trait, last I checked. Plus, if she keeps this up, she will be able to vacation anywhere she wants in about two years. The choices regarding this story are unpleasant for Democrats: 1. Barack and Michelle are fighting and she is so selfish she doesn’t care how it looks. (Actually the best scenario.) 2. Barack and Michelle are just self-indulgent and don’t care about the American people or how they might feel. Michelle feels entitled to a vacation, and dammit, she’s going to have one. 3. Barack and Michelle know how this will look and have no interest in Democrats getting re-elected in November. I happen to believe all three are true. It’s really not in President Obama’s best interest to have the Democrats in charge after November. So, President and Michelle Obama just push on doing whatever they want to do. There is also an element here that the President hasn’t quite grasped his responsibility as president-to represent the people. And the American people suffer while DC is rolling in it gangster style. Forget spats, optics, elections: The Obamas display contempt for the American people. Living like Kings while people are jobless and losing their homes is not just gauche, it stirs Americans at a primal level. Most Americans left another country so that average people could have a chance and not be lorded over by faux-aristocrats. Crossposted at Liberty Pundits

Link:
Michelle Obama Kicks It Euro-style While Americans, and Barack Obama, Watch

After MSNBC Mocks Angle for Expecting Fox Info Plugs, Ed Schultz Boasts How He’ll Boost Dems

Last Wednesday, Chris Matthews wildly attacked Fox for acting like “stooges” for Republican candidates like Sharron Angle to come on and promote their candidacies. It turns out that on the very same day on his national radio show, Ed Schultz was talking up how excited he was for “stooge” work for the Democrats on MSNBC:   I’m excited about the fact that now that I’ve been at MSNBC for over a year now, year and a half, this is the first election cycle that I get to go through with a TV show. I’ll show those son of a guns over at Fox how to promote candidates. I’ll do a great job doing that! [Michigan gubernatorial candidate] Virg Bernero will be on the tube tonight, a winner yesterday. Next up will be next Wednesday after the Tuesday primary in Colorado where Andrew Romanoff is going to defeat Mr. Bennet, the appointed senator, who was late to the table on helping Americans on health care reform. But Schultz attacked Angle in his “Psycho Talk” segment on his MSNBC show for expecting Fox to do what he was boasting he’d do for the Democrats: Wow. Now, you know it‘s bad when Fox News is calling the newest Tea Party queen naive. Hey, Sharron, I‘ll tell you how your wish can come true. Move to China. Their media censorship means that the press would only ask questions that you want to answer. Or better yet, maybe you can check out Iran. If journalists there don‘t report the news the way you want, well, they can get arrested. You‘d like that, wouldn‘t you? Here in America though, we have this thing called freedom of the press. It‘s kind of in the Constitution. You can ask your Tea Party buddies for a copy. They will have one for you. Republican leaders better hope Sharron Angle goes right back into hiding, because a wannabe public servant saying that she wants to control the press is “Psycho Talk.”

See the rest here:
After MSNBC Mocks Angle for Expecting Fox Info Plugs, Ed Schultz Boasts How He’ll Boost Dems

Sarah Palin Signs On to RNC Fundraising Letter

So  Allah has a couple of theories  about why Sarah Palin would sign a fundraising letter for the RNC: Fast-forward to today and suddenly she’s  signing letters  on their behalf. What gives? Two theories. One: She’s turned out to be such a good soldier and is so favorably disposed  to Michael Steele  that she’s willing to do a fundraising favor for an organization that desperately needs one right now to prepare for the midterms. Two: She really is eyeing a presidential run and wants to build a line of political credit with establishment types who aren’t big fans of hers at the moment. How about this? Sarah Palin has finally recognized her friends in D.C. They ain’t the NRSC or the NRCC, that’s for dang sure. Palin’s endorsements have been in direct odds with the NRSC’s and NRCC’s more often than not. Moreover, the NRSC and NRCC have worked overtime to undercut Michael Steele both publicly and privately and then gone to donors and asked them to donate there. This insanity is self-destructive, of course, because the RNC has the mechanism to get the vote out. The leadership in the House and Senate, though, are more about accumulating power and rewarding buddies than transforming the party. In fact, party transformation and reinvigoration, would probably hurt their incumbent arses, so what’s the motivation to change? Michael Steele has worked at reaching out everywhere. He’s open to bringing new energy from youth, minorities, etc, while also addressing the horrendous state of the technological infrastructure of the RNC. For his lack of money, he’s done a decent job given his circumstances. He also cleaned house when he took over the RNC, something that was much needed, even if some very good folks got caught in the outgoing tide. It’s impossible to overstate how entrenched certain consultancies and power brokers were with the RNC. That needed to change. But cutting ties with that many fat cats is bound to make enemies. [These consultants tell people where to send money, right? They wouldn’t want to help the RNC if the RNC isn’t spending enormous fees paying said consultants.] In short, Sarah Palin has far more in common with Chairman Michael Steele than she has with the leadership on the Hill, and, I might add, more to gain, personally, by befriending the RNC. Should the RNC start raking in some money, it may well help some of the grassroots races the Tea Party folks so passionately care about. This, of course, runs counter to conventional wisdom. Hating on Michael Steele has become a sport these days. And he has not gracefully made the transition from punditry to the more behind-the-scenes money making job of Chairman. Still, no RNC chairman has been harassed and undercut so nastily as Michael Steele. It’s ridiculous and unfair. Not to mention, those doing the criticizing have all had something to personally gain. Sour grapes because their Chairman candidate lost? Yes! Fear at losing control? Yes! Anxiety with a more open, bottom-up approach, rather than a top-down tight-fisted operation? Yes! Anyway, a partnership between Sarah Palin and Michael Steele could be a win-win. It seems they have both made a decision-really, neither one have anything to lose. Both are pretty much loathed by establishment Republicans. Why not unite her fund raising and star power with the RNC’s network and ability to organize? Crossposted at Liberty Pundits  

Read the original:
Sarah Palin Signs On to RNC Fundraising Letter

Adam Levine, Swizz Beatz, Kathy Griffin Talk Humiliation On ‘When I Was 17’

‘I was gross,’ Maroon 5 frontman says of his ‘Reality Bites’ style. By MTV News staff Adam Levine on “When I Was 17” Photo: MTV News This season on MTV’s “When I Was 17,” we’ve heard embarrassing stories of awkwardness, heartbreak and, um — OK, those have been our two big themes, because even celebs like Drake and Kevin Jonas were just dorky kids back in the day. This week’s episode, however, introduced entirely new levels of embarrassment, as Maroon 5 frontman Adam Levine , hip-hop luminary Swizz Beatz and comedian Kathy Griffin dished about their less glamorous moments from childhood. “When I was 17, I was gross,” Levine admitted on the show. “My hair was long and really ratty and nappy. [I wore] huge, oversize flannels that didn’t fit [and I had] a goatee. Like a bad version of Ethan Hawke in ‘Reality Bites.’ ” Levine shared something in common with Griffin, who looks back at her high school style with utter mortification. “I was pale, freckly and had Bozo hair!” she laughed. The foul-mouthed jokester was also completely unprepared for certain aspects of teenage social life. “One time, I was fooling around with this one guy. He was like, ‘Hey, Kath, you wanna see a penis?’ ” she said. “I said, ‘OK, but I’m not going to do anything, because I’m a lady.’ And so he unzips his pants, and then this thing comes out. It scared the f— out of me. I thought it was disgusting. I didn’t know that they’re purple. I thought it’d be tan. It had this really perfect shape. When I was 17, I did not shoot anyone, I did not go to jail, I just didn’t know what penises looked like.” Right. We have to admit, we’re at a loss for words. As was Swizz one time when he tried to sneak into a club and ran into an unamused bouncer. See, the future hip-hop star got his start DJing in clubs before he was even legally allowed to drink. Usually he’d sneak in the back. But on one occasion, he showed up late and tried his luck at the front entrance. “So I go through the front, I get to the door and — ‘Show me your ID!’ I’m like, ‘I don’t have no ID. What do you mean, show you my ID? I work here. I’m supposed to be getting the party started.’ ” Swizz said. “I was like, ‘I’m telling you, I work here!’ ” he recalled. “I’m speaking with so much authority. I’m this little skinny guy. He’s looking down on me, like, ‘I don’t care. Step over here.’ ” “When I Was 17” airs Saturday at 11 a.m. on MTV. Related Videos When I Was 17 | Ep. 14 | Adam Levine, Kathy Griffin, Swizz Beatz Related Photos When I Was 17 | Swizz Beatz When I Was 17 | Kathy Griffin When I Was 17 | Adam Levine When I Was 17 | Ep. 14 | Celebrity Photo Flashback

View post:
Adam Levine, Swizz Beatz, Kathy Griffin Talk Humiliation On ‘When I Was 17’

Jonas Brothers, Demi Lovato Create New ‘Camp’ Memories At Tour Kickoff

Saturday’s concert in Chicago featured duets, dance-offs and a generous helping of older hits. By Jocelyn Vena Jonas Brothers perform in Chicago on Saturday Photo: Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images TINLEY PARK, Illinois — After Demi Lovato played a raucous set of her original songs, some old-school “Camp Rock” numbers and a few tunes from the September 3 Disney Channel movie “Camp Rock 2,” Nick, Joe and Kevin Jonas hit the stage for the inaugural stop of their new tour at the First Midwest Bank Amphitheatre on a steamy Saturday night. The Jonas Brothers got their half of the party started with “Feeling Alive,” “Hold On” and “Year 3000,” and girls were immediately screaming, singing and dancing on their seats. “How are you guys doing tonight? You excited for ‘Camp Rock 2′?” Joe asked the crowd before dancers hit the stage for an uptempo, country-tinged new tune from the soundtrack. The guys played a number of songs off the soundtrack, and when Kevin asked for fans’ opinions of the new songs, he received a resounding cheer. The crowd went nuts when Demi came onstage to sing “This Is Me” along with the boys. Joe and Demi also played their new duet, “Wouldn’t Change a Thing.” “You guys are awesome,” Demi told everyone before saying good night. The next part of the night belonged to “L.A. Baby,” from their “JONAS L.A.” TV show. That led into a cover of the Beatles’ “Drive My Car.” After “Paranoid,” Joe and Kevin gave their little bro, Nick, the stage for his solo “Who I Am.” “Thank you so much for loving me for who I am,” he told everyone. Nick was rejoined by his brothers and took to the piano for “Fly With Me.” Then, girls went crazy for the ballad “When You Look Me in the Eyes.” Telling the fans they were going to “take them back in time,” the Jonases played “Please Be Mine” as photos of the guys from over the years showed on a screen behind them. Then the stage was transformed into a swanky jazz club, complete with dancers in ’20s garb, for “Lovebug.” For the encore, brought out their hits “S.O.S.” and then “Burnin’ Up.” And on this sweltering night, it took little to make the crowd burn up themselves, but Nick stripping down to a tank top made the girls scream even more as the show drew to a close. Are you going to see the Jonas Brothers and Demi Lovato in concert this summer? Tell us what you hope they play in the comments below. Related Photos The Jonas Brothers Play Chicago Related Artists Jonas Brothers Demi Lovato

Here is the original post:
Jonas Brothers, Demi Lovato Create New ‘Camp’ Memories At Tour Kickoff

You’re Invited to a Danielle Staub Stripper Party!

You’re clearly trying, Michaele Salahi , but you have a long way to go until you’ve earned the title of of Reality TV’s Biggest Villain. Barring a full personality makeover, this honor will belong to Danielle Staub for the foreseeable future. She’s helping to cement it by throwing herself a belated 48th birthday party – at a strip club! Just days after telling all Real Housewives to ” be humble ” and to “teach your children that hard work is definitely something that becomes lucrative,” Staub will make herself the center of attention at Scores, a gentleman’s establishment in New York City… … and we’re all invited! According to the invite, attendees will be treated to a live performance of the single “Real Close” and, we can only imagine, a pole dance by Danielle herself. After all, she certainly has the experience: YIKES!

See the rest here:
You’re Invited to a Danielle Staub Stripper Party!

MSNBC’s Cenk Uygur Rants: The Tea Party Is the ‘Cancer’ of the GOP

MSNBC’s Cenk Uygur railed against the Tea Party on Friday, attacking their members as the ” cancer of the Republican Party .” The liberal radio host was completing his final day as guest anchor of the 3pm hour of News Live. During each show’s program he would offer three short commentaries railing against conservatism or President Obama for not being liberal enough. Uygur, the host of the liberal Young Turks radio show, asserted that the Tea Party will “kill” Republicans after 2010, allowing that the midterms might result in a “slight bump up for the GOP.” In contrast, the Cook Report currently predicts a 32 to 42 seat pickup for the Republicans in the House. In a second commentary, Uygur hit Obama for not being liberal enough: “We challenged the Republicans and the President all week long. We took Obama to task for TARP Elizabeth Warren, civil liberties and many other issues. But, I did want to give the President some parting advice. Please, no more half measures!” He then dismissed Obama’s left-wing accomplishments, scoffing, “Instead we got pocket change.” Fox News’ 3pm host is the low key Shepherd Smith. MSNBC now seems to be experimenting with hard left anchors for midday as well as primetime. A transcript of Uygur’s two August 6 commentaries follows: 3:45pm EDT MSNBC Graphic: My Take CENK UYGUR: Now, look, I like to make predictions, so here’s a nice controversial one for you. The Tea Party is the cancer of the Republican Party . If they were actually fighting against corruption in government, it would be a positive movement as I just explained. But if all they do is drive the GOP further and further to the right, they’re going to kill the party. 2010 might be a slight bump up for the GOP given the circumstances, but that will only hurt them more in the long run as they become convinced that radicalism is the right answer. After 2010, the long, sad decline of the Republican Party will begin and we will look back and say it started at a party, the Tea Party. We’ll be right back. 3:54pm EDT MSNBC GRAPHIC: Cenk’s Takeaway UYGUR: At the beginning of the week I told you we would be challenging the government on the show. And I think we delivered. We challenged the Republicans and the President all week long. We took Obama to task for TARP Elizabeth Warren, civil liberties and many other issues. But, I did want to give the President some parting advice. Please, no more half measures! This country elected you because you ran on the message of change. They gave you huge majorities in the House and Senate. It was a clear mandate. And what did you use it for? Health care reform with the private insurers are still the only option. Yes, there were positive parts to the bill. But the system remains the same. And how about financial reform? Where the banks are still too big to fail. Don’t you get it? If and when they crash the economy again, they’re going to blame you! And that’s my point. If banks and insurance companies and t he Republicans and conservative media all attack you with 100 percent ferocity no matter what you do, why didn’t you try for 100 percent change? Instead we got pocket change. And now if it’s not good enough to pull us out of the rut, then they’re going to say progressive ideas didn’t work. But it ain’t over. You still have two and a half years to take the fight to them. Remember when you did you didn’t want to play the same old Washington games a little better? You wanted to change the game, I’m sorry, but right now the game is exactly as it was before. So, I’m asking for your own good and from now onto have the courage to give the American people the change you promised them.

View original post here:
MSNBC’s Cenk Uygur Rants: The Tea Party Is the ‘Cancer’ of the GOP

CNN’s Rick Sanchez: Obsessed With Fox News, Beck, and Limbaugh

CNN anchor Rick Sanchez revisited his vendetta against Fox News, Glenn Beck, and Rush Limbaugh on Thursday’s Rick’s List. Sanchez brought on outgoing Representative Bob Inglis, who lost a primary challenge to a Tea Party-backed Republican candidate, and when he harped about “flamethrowers” on TV and radio, the anchor pressed him on whether he meant the two radio hosts and his network’s competitor . Sanchez interviewed Rep. Inglis just before the top of the 4 pm Eastern hour. He introduced the politician by emphasizing the South Carolina Republican’s overall conservative record and his recent defeat in the primary: ” My next guest is a conservative firebrand . He is a veteran conservative congressman. In fact, he’s maintained a 93 percent conservative voting record….Pro-choice liberals have called him a ‘zero.’… He was a Ronald Reagan Republican, if there ever one was, and suddenly, he wakes up one day, and he simply is not conservative enough, not for South Carolina Republicans . He lost the recent primary. No- he got killed in the recent primary, 29-71 [percent].” However, what the CNN anchor left out is how Inglis was one of the few House Republicans who voted for a 2007 Democratic-sponsored resolution opposing the troop surge in Iraq , and has criticized skeptics of man-made global warming, as well as opposed offshore drilling . Most prominently, he voted for the 2008 bailout of the financial system . The Republican’s primary opponent used these votes and stances to defeat him. Sanchez first asked the outgoing congressman about an excerpt from his recent interview with the left-wing magazine Mother Jones, where he highlighted a constituent’s conspiracy theory about President Obama: SANCHEZ: [reading from the constituent’s letter] ‘Bob, what don’t you get? Barack Obama is a socialist, communist, Marxist, who wants to destroy the American economy so that he can take over as dictator. Health care is part of that, and he wants to open up the Mexican border and turn the U.S. into a Muslim nation .’…When I read that, I was just struck by the language. You vouch for that, right? That- who was telling you that? Later in the interview, Rep. Inglis criticized “this scapegoating that’s keeping us from the solutions” to issues like Social Security and Medicare. The anchor asked him to explain what he meant and borrowed from a recent argument by CNN contributor John Avlon , that the Tea Party would reject former President Reagan: “What do you mean, ‘scapegoating’? Where is this coming from? Because I said this or asked this of one of my guests yesterday- you know, if Ronald Reagan were running today, he would likely be in the same boat you’re in .” Sanchez pounced when the South Carolina congressman placed the blame on conservative media and grassroots activists, specifically ” Beck, Limbaugh, and the Tea Party wing ,” and took the opportunity to ask about his other favorite target, Fox News: INGLIS: I think that’s true, really. I mean, Reagan would have had a hard time on Tuesday, the 22nd of June, in the Fourth District of South Carolina, because he’s too optimistic. You know, he’s always- morning in America, the best days are still ahead. Way too many of these hot microphones on TV and radio are telling us that- no, our- the best days are behind us. It’s all going to pot. We’re done for, and way too many people are believing that stuff. I mean, the people that sell that are making millions off their books . SANCHEZ: Well, that’s interesting…. Here’s another quote. This is you on outside influences in the Republican Party. It’s what you were just getting at. You say, ‘It’s hard for Republicans in Congress to summon the courage to say no to Beck, Limbaugh, and the Tea Party wing.’ Amplify that thought process, if you would, for us, sir. INGLIS: Well, it’s very important that we basically say to these hot microphones, put down those flame-throwers. Stop running people- forcing people to this cliff that you want us to go over like lemmings. What we need to do to is say to them, stop- America’s best days are not behind us. They are in front of us, if we realize that we’re in this together, and we can solve these challenges of Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security. That’s where the big dollars are. That’s the crisis we’re facing. But, if we come together, we can actually solve that. It won’t be a 100 percent Republican solution. It won’t be a 100 percent Democrat solution, but it’s got to be an American solution that gets us to balance. So, but what we’re wasting time with is scapegoats. SANCHEZ: It almost you sounds like you’re saying that honorable people in the Republican Party are allowing themselves to be led, rather than leading. INGLIS: Well, I think there’s a big fear of these people with the hot microphones, because they have got powerful flamethrowers, and they throw that flame at you, and they say, get moving, and they get the crowd moving, and, meanwhile, you stop- SANCHEZ: You’re talking about Beck and Limbaugh and people like that? INGLIS: The people that make millions by selling soap and by selling books- SANCHEZ: Fox News? INGLIS: And by selling fear. SANCHEZ: Fox News? INGLIS: Well, they’re the competitor for you. But the idea here is to- SANCHEZ: Well, no. Look, I don’t care . I- I’m asking. I mean, you’re- I don’t know what it’s like to be a Republican congressman getting so much heat from what I believed was my side of the aisle, that it makes me start to wonder if people are pushing me in a direction I don’t want to go to. You’re in a unique position to tell his story to Americans, so I- you know, I’m not putting words in your mouth. I just know who are the people who drive that message out there, and I know that it’s Beck, and I know that it’s Limbaugh, and I know, that in many ways, you could argue it’s Fox News. Is it- do you feel it’s that way? INGLIS: Well, I think that there are a lot of people that are making a lot of money off of selling fear at this point. And there are networks that do that. There are individual talk show hosts that do that, and the sad thing is that an awful lot of Americans are running in fear in front of those folks, and especially, politicians are running in fear in front of those folks. But, really, if you’re going to lead, you need to face those hot microphones, and you need to say, put down the flame-throwers. We’re going to talk facts. The fact is, the President was born in America. The fact is, he is not a socialist. Now, let’s get rid of those non-sensical kind of commentaries and get to the real issues, which are, how do you cope with Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid? How do you put those on solid footing? On August 2, the CNN anchor hinted that Fox News wasn’t a legitimate news organization after the outlet received a front-row seat at White House press briefings. He did the same on the September 21, 2009 edition of his program.  Earlier that year, on April 8, Sanchez blamed Fox News and “right-wing radio” for the murder of three police officers in Pittsburgh. The anchor has also specifically targeted Beck and Limbaugh on a few occasions. Three weeks earlier, on July 14, Sanchez and CNN contributor Roland Martin slammed the two and their listeners : ” Well, unfortunately, there’s a lot of people in this country that look at legitimate news organizations like The Washington Post and scoff, and actually think that Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh are legitimate news organizations .” Five days before that, the CNN personality belittled conservative talks show hosts as he made a plausible reference to Limbaugh and Sean Hannity: ” The people who are really leading the charge in this country are the guys on the radio and- many of which don’t even have a college degree .” Most egregiously, he had to apologize in October 2009 after reading a dubious quote attributed to Limbaugh.

Read more:
CNN’s Rick Sanchez: Obsessed With Fox News, Beck, and Limbaugh

‘Jersey Shore’ Fans In Miami Weigh In On Change Of Scenery

‘They bring a little life to Miami,’ one fan tells MTV News. By Mawuse Ziegbe Cast of “Jersey Shore” Photo: MTV After bar-brawling, club-hopping and GTL-ing their way to pop-culture stardom, the “Jersey Shore” kids had to take things to the next level in season two. So the crew upped the ante by taking the drama to another shore. In the second season of the MTV reality hit, which kicked off last week, the gang fist-pumps its way through Miami, and for the most part, South Beach fans have been enjoying the party. “I love ‘Jersey Shore.’ It’s … crazy,” Francisco Santander told MTV News. Denise Mata concurred: “[There is] always drama there, and it’s fun to watch [the] fights and them getting drunk, and it’s just funny to me.” The “Shore” crew has partied its way into fans’ hearts but has also weathered criticism that the super-tanned, party-startin’ housemates — who proudly champion the term “guidos” — reinforce Italian stereotypes. David Gliottone enjoys the craziness but has issues with their image. “I like the fact that they’re Italian,” Gliottone said. ” I don’t like the way that they act sometimes, [because] I think it kind of brings a negative vibe to the Italian community.” Nora Weinberg said she thinks the “Shore” stars should keep the drama up north, but added that it’s cool they’re branching out beyond the boardwalk. “I think they should be in Jersey, but I think it’s fun that they can go to Miami,” she said. George Ott said the crew’s antics have reached beyond the shores of both Jersey and Miami to score fans Down Under. “[I’m a] huge fan of the show in New Zealand,” Ott said. “[I] love the boys [and] JWoww.” As entertaining as fans find the cast’s beachside escapades, one viewer said the “Jersey Shore” crew may have brought too much heat to Miami. “I think the ‘Jersey Shore’ cast is really crazy and outgoing and they bring a little life to Miami,” Cassandra said. “But they need to stick to Jersey because they’re not supposed to be here doing that stuff. You don’t see that here in Miami.” What do you think about the “Jersey Shore” cast being in Miami? Let us know in the comments below! Don’t miss “Jersey Shore” every Thursday at 10 p.m. ET/PT on MTV. Related Videos The Return Of ‘Jersey Shore’

Excerpt from:
‘Jersey Shore’ Fans In Miami Weigh In On Change Of Scenery

Current Groups: Educating America

I created a group meant to inform people on the latest issue that will affect their future. I myself am a dropout, but have recently sought to self educate myself. So join the group if you want to learn about stuff and things. http://current.com/groups/educating-america/ http://www.londonmet.ac.uk/londonmet/fms/MRSite/psd/dmcf/PR-Pages/August_09/curr… added by: ibrake4rappers13