Tag Archives: Phoenix

Report: Montana Fishburne Beat the Crap Out of Boyfriend’s Ex, Faces Assault Charges

Montana Fishburne is a porn star and doesn’t try to hide it. No word if she’s equally and unabashedly proud of the fact that she is being prosecuted for assault with a deadly weapon against her boyfriend’s ex this year. Laurence Fishburne’s 19-year-old daughter was arrested back in February for allegedly barging into the alleged victim’s home, forcing her into the bathroom and beating her senseless. According to TMZ, the victim had “significant injuries.” The L.A. City Attorney’s Office has charged Montana Fishburne with battery, and will add charges of false imprisonment and assault with a deadly weapon. More details from Chippy D’s troubled past have come to light. Montana, who’s being repped by Shawn Chapman Holley (the famed attorney for Lindsay Lohan, among others) pleaded not guilty and the case is pending. Her boyfriend in question, Jerome Greene, was also charged in the attack against his ex-girlfriend, but has already pleaded no contest to domestic battery. As for Montana, who just released her first sex tape through Vivid (she was just offered a multi-picture deal ), she can pile it on the list of legal problems. She was arrested for prostitution last November, pleading no contest to a lesser charge of criminal trespass and being placed on probation as a result. If nothing else, the assault case could be a probation violation. Stay tuned.

See the original post here:
Report: Montana Fishburne Beat the Crap Out of Boyfriend’s Ex, Faces Assault Charges

John McCain is on Team Snooki

Nicole Polizzi, a.k.a. Snooki from Jersey Shore, has found an unlikely ally in U.S. Sen. John McCain. Ally for what? Nothing really. But he’s on Team Snooki! In a radio interview yesterday, the former GOP Presidential candidate offered his opinion on the July 30 disorderly conduct arrest of the MTV reality star. “I kind of think she might be too good looking to go to jail,” said McCain , seeking reelection to the Senate this year at the age of 73, on Phoenix’s KMLE. Snooki, who spent a few hours behind bars for being drunk in broad daylight before posting bail, agrees. Monday, she told MTV succinctly, and humbly: “I’m too pretty to be in jail… I’m not a criminal.” Start printing the McCain/Snooki 2012 presidential campaign signs now. She may actually be an intellectual step up from his previous choice of running mate . Amazingly, this isn’t the first McCain shout-out to the pint-sized party girl. After the Oompa Loompa lodged a complaint about proposed taxes on tanning beds in the Jersey Shore premiere, the veteran politician Tweeted in kind. McCain, or an intern who watches Jersey Shore and worked in a quality play on words, Tweeted at Ms. Polizzi: “@Sn00ki ur right, I would never tax ur tanning bed! O’s tax policy is quite The Situation. but I do rec wearing sunscreen!” EDITOR’S NOTE : In referencing this line – one of our favorite Jersey Shore quotes of the new season – we chided Snooki on the grounds that the law doesn’t take effect for years. The law has, in fact, taken effect already. We regret the error! Snook bashed President Obama for his “tax on tanning.” Obama, too, referenced her in a recent interview, although somewhat less flatteringly. He claimed he didn’t know who Snooki was during his controversial appearance on The View .

Continue reading here:
John McCain is on Team Snooki

Snooki ‘Too Good-Looking’ For Jail, John McCain Agrees

In another interview, ‘Jersey Shore’ starlet addresses President Obama and New Jersey Governor Chuck Christie. By Mawuse Ziegbe Snooki Photo: Jerritt Clark/ Getty Images “Jersey Shore” party girl Snooki responded to her recent arrest by declaring that she’s “too pretty” to be thrown in jail . And it appears that at least one politician has her back. In an interview with Phoenix radio station KMLE Country 108 , Senator John McCain agreed with Snooki’s claims that she’s too much of a looker to be thrown in the slammer. On Wednesday (August 11), the onetime presidential hopeful posed a question to KMLE listeners: “Is Snooki too good-looking to go to jail or not?” McCain inquired. “She … has given a whole new meaning to our justice system, you gotta admit. I’m kinda leaning towards Snooki being too good-looking.” The politician said he’s been looking out for the reality starlet, named Nicole Polizzi, ever since they bonded during a Twitter exchange blasting President Obama’s taxes on tanning . “Now, I’ve been worried about what’s going on with her, of course, since I have this attachment,” McCain said. Although she has the senator’s attention, Snooki’s club-hopping antics haven’t hit the radar of the commander in chief. During a July visit to the ladies of ABC’s “The View,” Obama conceded that while he knows about Justin Bieber , he has no idea who Snooki is. The starlet recently said she doesn’t believe the president isn’t getting his weekly “Jersey Shore” fix. “I know he knows who I am,” Snooki told E! Online . “Why did he have to lie and say he didn’t know me? He did [mention] Snooki and JWoww about the tanning stuff, and now he doesn’t know who I am? He has to stop lying.” Although there’s no word on whether an Obama/Snooki beer summit will hit the president’s calendar anytime soon, Snooks has a message for a politician who’s definitely aware of the GTL-ing crew. In response to New Jersey Governor Chris Christie’s claims that the “Shore” collective puts the Garden State in a bad light, Snooki advised the governor to just relax. “He needs to come over and have a hot dog and a Corona and just chill,” she said. Do you agree with McCain and Snooki that she is “too pretty” for jail? Do you think Obama is lying about not knowing who Snickers is? Let us know in the comments below! Watch “Jersey Shore” Thursdays at 10 p.m. ET on MTV.

Read more:
Snooki ‘Too Good-Looking’ For Jail, John McCain Agrees

Dan Quayle’s Son: "Barack Obama Is The Worst President In History"

CNN) – Ben Quayle, the son of former Vice President Dan Quayle who is seeking a House seat in Arizona, is making a splash with a new campaign ad in which he looks straight into the camera and declares, “Barack Obama is the worst president in history.” “My generation will inherit a weakened country,” Quayle also says solemnly in the new 30-second spot. “Drug cartels in Mexico, tax cartels in DC. What's happened to America? I love Arizona. I was raised right. Someone needs to go to Washington and knock the hell out of the place.” Quayle, the 33-year-old son of the former vice president, is one of 10 Republicans seeking the GOP nomination for the third district House seat of retiring Rep. John Shadegg. The Republican-leaning district primarily encompasses Phoenix and its surrounding suburbs. Quayle recently ran into controversy after admitting to having posted on the controversial website DirtyScottsdale.com four years ago. The racy website features scantily clad women and focuses on profiling the Scottsdale nightclub scene. Quayle told a local TV station Tuesday he posted on the website on behalf of a friend to “drive some traffic.” added by: TimALoftis

CBS’s Blackstone: Immigration Debate ‘Boiling Over,’ ‘Often-Angry’

In a report on Arizona’s immigration law for CBS’s Sunday Morning, correspondent John Blackstone declared: “In the heat of the Arizona summer, America’s long-simmering immigration debate is boiling over.” He portrayed it as the latest wave of anti-immigrant sentiment: “The often-angry debate….whether yet another influx of outsiders can be accepted into a nation of immigrants.”   At the top of the program, the Early Show’s Harry Smith, filling in for host Charles Osgood, teased Blackstone’s report this way: “‘The New Colossus’ is the name of the Emma Lazarus poem about the Statue of Liberty, the poem that speaks of a ‘golden door’ for immigrants to America. S.B.1070 is the name of the Arizona law that critics say betrays that promise , but which supporters say is necessitated by a tide of illegal immigration.” As Blackstone introduced his report later, a series of newspaper headlines flashed on screen: “Ariz. immigration law creates rift; Obama Blasts Arizona Law; Arizona Enacts Stringent Law on Immigration.” He then profiled one illegal immigrant: “…the immigration debate…means everything to 23-year-old Hermann. He’s an undocumented immigrant we met at a church gathering….The current atmosphere leaves Hermann nervous but eager to tell his story.” A clip was played of Hermann fretting: “For eight years, I’ve been in the shadows, you know. It’s been to a point where you’re almost paranoid, walking around.” Blackstone touted Hermann’s accomplishments: “He went to high school and then college…The day of his college graduation, he was awarded not one degree, but two…And the speaker that day was President Obama.” Blackstone added: “It’s often said illegal immigrants don’t pay taxes. Hermann does pay taxes and showed me his returns.” Later in the story, after describing the “often-angry debate” over the issue, Blackstone observed: “In Arizona, fears that the state is being overrun by those who won’t wait and that the border is out of control don’t match reality, says Homeland Security Secretary Napolitano.” A clip was played of Napolitano: “There are more than twice as many border patrol agents at the border than just a few years ago. There’s more technology. There’s more infrastructure. There’s more air cover and there’s more every day on the way.” As she listed each border security effort, CBS was helpful enough to provide corresponding video footage to bolster her case. Blackstone continued: “Despite a perception that illegal immigrants are causing a crime wave, the FBI says violent crime near the border has actually fallen in the past decade….The Department of Homeland Security estimates the number of undocumented immigrants living in the U.S. dropped from 11.6 million in January 2008, to 10.8 million in January 2009.” Napolitano claimed: “…the numbers are all going in the right direction.” Nearing the end of his report, Blackstone did some lobbying for a particular piece of immigration legislation: “Many young undocumented immigrants, like Hermann, have their hopes pinned on the Dream Act – legislation first introduced in 2001 that has stalled in Congress. It would award residency to many brought here as children, younger than 16, who have graduated from high school. Hermann sees the Dream Act as his chance to make a life in the country where he studied, works, and pays taxes.” Here is a full transcript of the August 8 segment: 9:00AM TEASE HARRY SMITH: ‘The New Colossus’ is the name of the Emma Lazarus poem about the Statue of Liberty, the poem that speaks of a ‘golden door’ for immigrants to America. S.B.1070 is the name of the Arizona law that critics say betrays that promise, but which supporters say is necessitated by a tide of illegal immigration. The heated debate is almost certain to end up before the Supreme Court. John Blackstone will report our cover story. JOHN BLACKSTONE: Each year, some 700,000 people from around the world are sworn in as American citizens. The controversy in Arizona and elsewhere is about the 500,000 or so who come in illegally each year. Hermann is one of them. Just you being here, you’re breaking the law. HERMANN: Absolutely. And – and the thing is that it’s an outdated law. JOHN BLACKSTONE: The immigration debate in Arizona and across the country, later on Sunday Morning. 9:09AM SEGMENT HARRY SMITH: S.B.1070 is the controversial Arizona immigration law that a federal judge found partially unconstitutional last month. As the appeal of that decision works its way toward the Supreme Court, the argument in the court of public opinion goes on as well. Our cover story is reported by John Blackstone. JOHN BLACKSTONE: In the heat of the Arizona summer, America’s long-simmering immigration debate is boiling over. CROWD PROTESTING IMMIGRATION LAW: Si se puede! Si se puede! [ON-SCREEN GRAPHIC OF NEWSPAPER HEADLINE: Ariz. immigration law creates rift] BLACKSTONE: While protestors take to the streets, the state and federal governments are fighting in court over who can write and enforce immigration law. [ON-SCREEN GRAPHIC OF NEWSPAPER HEADLINE: Obama Blasts Arizona Law] UNIDENTIFIED MAN A: We will not comply. UNIDENTIFIED MAN B: We will enforce the law. BLACKSTONE: When Arizona’s Governor Jan Brewer signed the state’s tough new immigration law in April, she said it was needed because of Washington’s failures. [ON-SCREEN GRAPHIC OF NEWSPAPER HEADLINE: Arizona Enacts Stringent Law on Immigration] She was angered by the court decision, that temporarily at least, blocked major parts of the measure. JAN BREWER: Now they’ve got this temporary injunction, they need to step up, the feds do, and do the job that they have the responsibility to do for the people of America, and for the people of Arizona. JANET NAPOLITANO: All allegiance and fidelity. BLACKSTONE: Former Arizona Governor Janet Napolitano now has responsibility for securing the border as secretary of Homeland Security. NAPOLITANO: There’s frustration out there. I think there’s a misconception that securing the border means sealing the border and anyone who’s been on the border knows that that’s just a physical impossibility among other things. You don’t seal the border but you secure the border. BLACKSTONE: Securing the border was Harold Beasley’s job for more than three decades. Now retired in Arizona, the current battle has him talking about putting on his uniform again. HAROLD BEASLEY: Why don’t you give it a try? Bring me out of retirement and give me 200 Border Patrol agents and I’ll show you how many people I can deport in a couple of months. You know, it’s – it’s – it’s – it’s a hard job, but you can do it. [CROWD PROTESTING IMMIGRATION LAW] BLACKSTONE: If the immigration debate means a lot to Harold Beasley, it means everything to 23-year-old Hermann. He’s an undocumented immigrant we met at a church gathering. He was brought here by his family when he was 15. HERMANN: And I completely fell in love with the country. I – I felt, you know, there’s so many opportunities. There’s so many things you can do here. I want to stay. I want to, you know, be someone. I want to go to school, be the best I can be. BEASLEY: I see people in my hometown of Phoenix, Arizona now demonstrating, carrying signs, saying that I owe them something. I owe them rights. I owe them, you know, welfare. I owe them this and I owe them that. BLACKSTONE: The estimated 460,000 illegal immigrants in Arizona cost the state about $900 million dollars a year for education, health care, and incarceration, according to Arizona officials. And at a time when unemployment in Arizona is 9.6%, there are fears undocumented workers are taking jobs Americans should have. UNIDENTIFIED MAN C: We are America! Get over it! [SPLIT SCREEN: On Left: Protestor sign reading ‘Land of the Free! Really?’; On Right: Police officer in riot gear]   BLACKSTONE: The current atmosphere leaves Hermann nervous but eager to tell his story. HERMANN: For eight years, I’ve been in the shadows, you know. It’s been to a point where you’re almost paranoid, walking around. But I think this is – it’s now or never, you know. You got to say what you got to say. BLACKSTONE: Hermann’s family came from Venezuela on tourist visas but never left. He went to high school and then college. HERMANN: And I worked full time while I was at school, almost 40 hours. Actually, my senior year, all throughout the – the year, I worked at nights, delivering newspapers. BLACKSTONE: The day of his college graduation, he was awarded not one degree, but two. HERMANN: Bachelor of Science in Business Administration, Magna Cum Laude. And that’s my Bachelor of Arts in Psychology, Magna Cum Laude as well. BLACKSTONE: And the speaker that day was President Obama. BARACK OBAMA: We need young people like you to step up. We need your daring. We need your enthusiasm. We need your energy. We need your imagination. HERMANN: If there was a pathway for me to become legalized even right now, I would do it, I would do it. BLACKSTONE: It’s often said illegal immigrants don’t pay taxes. Hermann does pay taxes and showed me his returns. He doesn’t have a Social Security number; but the IRS gives undocumented workers a special taxpayer number, information that is not shared with immigration authorities. HERMANN: It’s funny how the system works. You know, they – they won’t give you that chance to work but they do want you to pay those taxes. BLACKSTONE: The often-angry debate here in Arizona reflects a discussion that’s been going on through much of America’s history. The country’s dilemma is whether yet another influx of outsiders can be accepted into a nation of immigrants. Each year, about 700,000 people raise their hands to be sworn in as American citizens. Getting into America legally isn’t quick or easy. Mumtaz Shamsee, from Pakistan, became an American citizen last month. MUMTAZ SHAMSEE: The whole process, since the day I arrived till the day I took my oath, is almost 19 years. BLACKSTONE: He came here first on a student visa. Then, after graduating as a computer engineer, he got a temporary work visa, and eventually citizenship. SHAMSEE: I feel like I earned my citizenship because the rule is if you are on work visa, H1, and you get laid off, you have to find another job or you are illegal, your status is illegal. You’re supposed to leave the country. BLACKSTONE: Fortunately for him, his skills were in demand in Silicon Valley so he could stay. Many other prospective immigrants have to wait patiently in their home countries. SUSAN CURDA: There has to be a visa number available, and sometimes that actually can take several years. BLACKSTONE: Susan Curda of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services says to come here legally most immigrants need either a job offer or an immediate family member already living here. Then get in line. CURDA: The countries that have the most people wanting to come to the United States, the wait’s going to be longer. BLACKSTONE: In Arizona, fears that the state is being overrun by those who won’t wait and that the border is out of control don’t match reality, says Homeland Security Secretary Napolitano. NAPOLITANO: There are more than twice as many border patrol agents at the border than just a few years ago. There’s more technology. There’s more infrastructure. There’s more air cover and there’s more every day on the way. [ON-SCREEN: Footage of Border Patrol efforts as Napolitano lists them] BLACKSTONE: Despite a perception that illegal immigrants are causing a crime wave, the FBI says violent crime near the border has actually fallen in the past decade: in Phoenix down 10%, in San Diego down 17%, in El Paso, Texas, down 36%. In fact, illegal immigration as a whole is actually declining, although the poor economy may have as much to do with that as improved border security. The Department of Homeland Security estimates the number of undocumented immigrants living in the U.S. dropped from 11.6 million in January 2008, to 10.8 million in January 2009. NAPOLITANO: Even as that has been going on and the numbers are all going in the right direction and – and all the rest, I think there’s a realization, particularly in border states, that the underlying immigration law needs to be updated, needs to be reformed. UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN A: It’s a fight for the Dream Act- BLACKSTONE: Many young undocumented immigrants, like Hermann, have their hopes pinned on the Dream Act – legislation first introduced in 2001 that has stalled in Congress. It would award residency to many brought here as children, younger than 16, who have graduated from high school. Hermann sees the Dream Act as his chance to make a life in the country where he studied, works, and pays taxes. HERMANN: This is my home. I – I do feel like I’m an American. You know, I have a great love, a great respect for this country. I’ve always had it. BLACKSTONE: But Hermann’s wish to live here legally is one shared by millions around the world. CROWD: And to the Republic for which it stands- BLACKSTONE: Many immigrants think coming to America is like winning a lottery. And that’s exactly how Paras and Davita Upadhyay from Nepal got here. They were winners of the State Department’s Diversity Visa Lottery, which awards 55,000 visas a year to people in countries that send few immigrants to America. DAVITA UPADHYAY: He was all excited, yeah. It was exciting. We were not expecting that. PARAS UPDHYAY: Yeah, we were not expecting that. UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN B: Raise your right hands. BLACKSTONE: More people want to come to the United States than to anywhere else and that is a challenge of immigration reform. Among all those who dream of becoming American, how do we choose who to accept?

Follow this link:
CBS’s Blackstone: Immigration Debate ‘Boiling Over,’ ‘Often-Angry’

Five for Five: Top Five News Stories Broken or Advanced by NewsBusters | Round 3 of T-Shirt Winners

Editor’s Note: For the list of NewsBusters T-shirt contest winners, skip to the end of this post. Click here to enter the contest . It’s time once again for “Five for Five,” this time our list of the Top Five News Stories Broken or Advanced by NewsBusters. We start with an honorable mention that just barely failed to make the cut, but is worth noting for its impact on the blogospher, Noel Sheppard’s August 1, 2009 post, “Obama Joker Poster Popping Up in Los Angeles.” As for our top five, they are blog posts that uncovered: The beginnings of ClimateGate [ “Possible Conspiracy to Falsify Temperature Data Uncovered” from Nov. 20, 2009]  The early beginnings of the Tea Party movement [ “CNBC’s Santelli Explains His Anti-Obamanomics Call for Revolt” from February 19, 2009] Audio of President Obama telling the San Francisco Chronicle of his desire to bankrupt the coal industry [November 2, 2008] MSNBC’s close-cropping video of a gun owner at a Tea Party rally so that you can’t tell he’s a black man — MSNBCers were insisting the rallies were racist [August 18, 2009] And perhaps our biggest news item of all, from March 18, 2008, when our very own Rich Noyes disproved Hillary Clinton’s claim of having come under fire in a 1996 visit to Bosnia. Here’s the 1996 news footage that Noyes dug up from the Media Research Center archive: And now, as promised, the third round of winners in our 5th anniversary T-shirt giveaway . Congratulations to: John D. of Anderson, S.C. Paul C. of Rockaway, N.J. Earl S. of Willis, Texas Vicki L. of Hinckley, Ill. Larry G. of Doniphan, Mo. Nathan M. of Jefferson Township, Pa. Carolann M. of Gaithersburg, Md. Roy D. of Burnsville, N.C. Benjamin S. of Hillsdale, Mich. Galen W. of Fayetteville, Pa.  John B. of Oakhurst, Calif. John P. of Cincinnati, Ohio Rick G. of Olympia, Wash. Sandra G. of Providence, R.I. Fred K. of Sandy Lake, Pa. Albert C. of Vinton, Va. Joe G. of Lockport, N.Y. Ruth S. of Phoenix, Ariz. Carmen M. of Woodruff, S.C. Joseph P. of Kearney, Neb. Stephen W. of Tacoma, Wash. Sandy C.of Niantic, Conn. Cliff P. of Fayetteville, Ark. Dale W. of Cannelburg, Ind. Mary H. of Rockford, Ill.

Read the original:
Five for Five: Top Five News Stories Broken or Advanced by NewsBusters | Round 3 of T-Shirt Winners

Joaquin Phoenix Documentary Gets Studio, Release Date

‘I’m Still Here: The Lost Year of Joaquin Phoenix’ will chart Phoenix’s path from A-list actor to MC, studio exec says. By Kara Warner Joaquin Phoenix Photo: Jacob Andrzejczak/ Getty Images While fans of Joaquin Phoenix remain divided about whether to take the actor’s rap music aspirations seriously — some saying his bizarre public appearances qualify him for “kooky actor” status,

Joaquin Phoenix Mockumentary Opening Sept. 10

The best documentary ever made about Joaquin Phoenix getting crapped on is coming at you this fall. As rumored, Magnolia Pictures has sent over official confirmation that it bought I’m Still Here , the Casey Affleck-directed spectacle that has apparently dropped its subtitle, “The Lost Year of Joaquin Phoenix.” It will open Sept. 10 in limited release; I guess expect that proposed Phoenix/Letterman reunion … Sept. 7?

Read the original:
Joaquin Phoenix Mockumentary Opening Sept. 10

AP Video ‘Expert’: Being Here ‘Without Documentation’ Isn’t a Crime

One reason to hope that the Big 3 networks continue to muddle through their awful evening news ratings and somehow hang around is that there’s an alternative out there that would be much worse. If any of the networks ever considered outsourcing their nightly newscasts to the Associated Press, the likely result could be bad enough to make some long for the (relatively) good old days of Brian, Diane, and Katie. An object example of the AP’s pathetically one-sided, biased and completely not-transparent video reporting came last Tuesday when it covered the Department of Justice’s lawsuit against Arizona’s illegal immigration enforcement measure. The 1070 law tells police to verify citizenship status in “contact” situations (e.g., traffic stops and other routine matters) if they have a “reasonable suspicion” that the person or persons involved aren’t here legally. AP’s go-to “expert” acts as if it’s a given that the United States government has decided that being here illegally (“without documentation”) isn’t a crime. Seriously. During the 104-second report ( first go here , then type “Arizona immigration” in the search bar near the bottom, and select “Fed. Suing to Block Ariz. Immigration Law”), AP reporter Brian Thomas interviewed no one who defended the law’s constitutionality. Here’s the transcript: Brian Thomas, AP Reporter: The Obama administration is suing the state of Arizona over what the President has called “a misguided law.” Federal officials say the state’s new immigration policy tries to override the government’s authority under the Constitution. The measure requires police to question and possibly arrest illegal immigrants during the enforcement of other laws, like traffic stops. Steven Vladeck, American Univ. Law Professor: The federal government has long since decided that it’s not a crime to be in the United States without documentation. You can be removed from the United States, you can be deported, but you cannot be put in jail. And so the question is, “Do individual states, Arizona today, Maryland tomorrow, have the authority to decide for themselves to have a harsher regime?” Thomas: The Justice Department argues the state plan will lead to the harassment of American citizens and others who are authorized to be here. Tony Bustamante, Attorney in Arizona : Federal priority enforcement of immigration laws is to go after the criminals, the bad people who are causing havoc on society, not the gardeners and the landscapers and the cooks who make the economy go ’round and ’round. Thomas: Those who support the pending law have said the stringent rules are necessary to fight drug trafficking, murders and other crimes plaguing the border state. Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio: Maybe the federal government ought to ask for the help of local and state law enforcement to stop this illegal immigration situation. Thomas: The federal government is hoping its lawsuit will stop other states looking to follow Arizona’s lead. Vladeck: If the federal government can show the Arizona laws are inconsistent with federal policies, the federal government can, should, and will win. And I think it’s likely that they will do so. Thomas : The next step is for the case to be assigned to a judge who will decided temporarily whether to block the law from taking effect at the end of this month. A two-word, law-based response to Vladeck’s claim that “The federal government has long since decided that it’s not a crime to be in the United States without documentation” — Horse manure : Search 8 U.S.C. § 1325 : US Code – Section 1325: Improper entry by alien (a) Improper time or place; avoidance of examination or inspection; misrepresentation and concealment of facts Any alien who (1) enters or attempts to enter the United States at any time or place other than as designated by immigration officers, or (2) eludes examination or inspection by immigration officers, or (3) attempts to enter or obtains entry to the United States by a willfully false or misleading representation or the willful concealment of a material fact, shall, for the first commission of any such offense, be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than 6 months, or both, and, for a subsequent commission of any such offense, be fined under title 18, or imprisoned not more than 2 years, or both. (b) Improper time or place; civil penalties Any alien who is apprehended while entering (or attempting to enter) the United States at a time or place other than as designated by immigration officers shall be subject to a civil penalty of – (1) at least $50 and not more than $250 for each such entry (or attempted entry); or (2) twice the amount specified in paragraph (1) in the case of an alien who has been previously subject to a civil penalty under this subsection. Civil penalties under this subsection are in addition to, and not in lieu of, any criminal or other civil penalties that may be imposed. The “without documentation” portion of Vladeck’s statement is at best useless misdirection. If you aren’t here legally, you’re subject to the sanctions just noted. If you’re here legally and happen to be “without documentation” at any given moment, that’s a totally different situation, and I believe he knows it. The federal government (i.e., the executive branch) doesn’t get to “decide” what is and what is not a crime. To make illegal entry not a crime, the law has to be changed by the legislative branch. That hasn’t happened. Vladeck’s claim that “you cannot be put in jail” for being here illegally is objectively false, as bolded above in the excerpt from the law. Also note the use of the word “shall” (i.e., there is normally not supposed to be any discretion) as opposed to “may.” Arizona’s law is on target with the intent of federal law. Vladeck’s next bolded claim in the transcript above is tantamount to saying, “Policy becomes the law, no matter what the law says.” No sir. Of course there will always be prosecutorial discretion that will dictate the best and most appropriate use of an attorney general’s or county prosecutor’s resources, but that’s not what’s at play here. What Vladeck is saying it that because immigration enforcement officials have a policy of trying to avoid going after “non-criminals” (an illogical word, because you’re a criminal in this country the minute you cross the border illegally), that policy has in effect become the law, no matter what the law really is. Brian Thomas could have found dozens of people to make mince meat of Vladeck’s arguments, and chose not to. I wonder why? This is lazy, statist liberalism at its best: We don’t like a law, so we won’t enforce it, until that tradition of non-enforcement becomes the law. It’s the same bubble-headed logic that underlies the entire liberal mind-set towards the constitution: We don’t like it, so we’re going to decide that it means something other than what it clearly says, instead of going through the constitutionally mandated and deliberately difficult-by-design process of passing a constitutional amendment to change it to its desired meaning. Say what you will about whether or not the prohibition movement was misguided, but you have to acknowledge that they respected the constitution and the country enough to get their work done the right way. Contrast that with what the Clinton administration (and to an extent, the several administrations that preceded it) did to tobacco companies. From the “This was so predictable” Dept. — Vladeck’s views towards the executive branch powers are selection and arguably partisan, as you will see from the opening paragraph of his American University bio : Stephen I. Vladeck is a Professor of Law at American University Washington College of Law, where his teaching and research focus on federal jurisdiction, national security law, constitutional law (especially the separation of powers), and international criminal law. A nationally recognized expert on the role of the federal courts in the war on terrorism, he was part of the legal team that successfully challenged the Bush Administration’s use of military tribunals at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, Here’s another “This was so predictable” item, this time about “Attorney in Arizona” Tony (Antonio) Bustamante, from the far-left Phoenix New Times : For our (40th) anniversary, we gathered many — not all — of those who’ve been targets of Sheriff Joe Arpaio and former County Attorney Andrew Thomas. Some, like politicos Phil Gordon, Mary Rose Wilcox, and Don Stapley, are converts to the struggle. Others, activists, stood up to protect the most vulnerable amongst us: Mexicans seeking to be part of the American Dream; prisoners looking to survive. … 17) Antonio Bustamante: Phoenix attorney and activist who advises those who monitor Arpaio’s anti-immigrant sweeps and defends demonstrators arrested for protesting the sheriff. Brian Thomas didn’t think viewers needed to know anything about Vladeck’s or Bustamante’s background. How typically pathetic. Oh, I almost forgot: The picture at the top right of the Mexican flag appearing to fly about the Arizona flag is what viewers of the AP video get to see during the report’s final seconds. It looks like a childish “in your face” move to me. And I didn’t get to the matter of what other states, including Rhode Island , are doing that is at least as “harsh” as what Arizona is set to do. As stated earlier, we could do worse than the evening news shows NBC, ABC, and CBS are currently feeding us. If AP’s video reports really are the go-to alternative, we should hope that Brian, Diane, and Katie remain mired in mediocrity instead of disappearing entirely. Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com .

Read the original post:
AP Video ‘Expert’: Being Here ‘Without Documentation’ Isn’t a Crime

NBC Reporter Discovers New Immigration Law Causing Illegals to Leave Arizona

NBC’s Lee Cowan, on Thursday’s NBC Nightly News with Brian Williams, discovered a stunning result of Arizona’s new immigration policies – illegal immigrants are now leaving the state. Cowan opened his piece noting a long line now “stretches around the Mexican Consulate in Phoenix every day” but noticed a twist, as the line was full of “immigrants trying to figure out not how to stay in Arizona, but how to flee it.” Cowan peppered his story with anecdotes of local businesses losing customers “A look around this once-bustling barrio is telling. The local hair salon has more empty chairs now than customers” and schools losing students as he claimed “School numbers are dwindling, too. This one is 75 percent Hispanic. Since the immigration law passed, they’ve lost more than 100 students.” Cowan even punctuated this factoid with the sob story of a boy being taken out of school by his father to go back to Mexico: LEE COWAN: For the Bolanos family, they stayed as long as they could. MARCIAL BOLANOS, ARIZONA RESIDENT: Arizona is a good state, but no more now. COWAN: He took his 15-year-old son out of school and is headed back to Mexico, which brings Hugo to tears. But you’re really going to miss your friends? HUGO BOLANOS: Yeah. While Cowan did air a soundbite of a Republican state senator who pointed out that it was “kind of a novel idea” that people were “actually worried they may be arrested for breaking the law” he concluded his piece by emphasizing the economic cost of Arizona’s new immigration policy: “It may be months before anyone knows for sure just how many illegal immigrants and their business the law has scared away. Supporters say good riddance, but critics fear the damage has already started.” The following is a transcript of the Cowan segment as it was aired on the July 8 edition of NBC’s Nightly News with Brian Williams: BRIAN WILLIAMS: Now we turn to Arizona, where the federal government is challenging the state’s tough new immigration law. Arizona’s governor set up a fund to defend the law. As of today, 9,000 people, mostly from out of state, have contributed a half a million dollars to the effort. Some of those targeted by the new law are not waiting for it to take effect later this summer. They’re leaving the state now. NBC’s Lee Cowan has our report. LEE COWAN: One way to measure the effect of Arizona’s pending immigration law is the length of this line. It stretches around the Mexican Consulate in Phoenix every day, immigrants trying to figure out not how to stay in Arizona, but how to flee it. LUIS BALENCEA, ARIZONA RESIDENT: There’s a lot of people already leaving for New Mexico, leaving something else, you know. COWAN: Anywhere but here. BALENCEA: Anywhere, yeah. Nobody want to stay here. COWAN: A look around this once-bustling barrio is telling. The local hair salon has more empty chairs now than customers. The owner is even losing two employees. ROSANA QUINTERO, SALON OWNER: People look very sad. And we feel sad, too. COWAN: The café next door is even emptier. MARIA SIERRA, BUSINESS OWNER: I ask the people, and they say they afraid to come out. COWAN: School numbers are dwindling, too. This one is 75 percent Hispanic. Since the immigration law passed, they’ve lost more than 100 students. JEFF SMITH, BALSZ SCHOOL DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT: This is sort of the tip of the iceberg. More are waiting until the law goes into effect, and then we’ll see more people leaving during the summer. COWAN: To the authors of Arizona’s tough new immigration stance, if there is a mass exodus of illegal immigrants, so be it. REPUBLICAN STATE SENATOR RUSSELL PEARCE: Kind of a novel idea, you know, people actually worried they may be arrested for breaking the law. COWAN: The problem is there really are no hard numbers on the issue. So the question critics are asking: Is this exodus a myth or a fact? BILL HART, ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY: We think it’s fact. We don’t exactly know what’s happening, but we know something’s happening on a large scale. COWAN: For the Bolanos family, they stayed as long as they could. MARCIAL BOLANOS, ARIZONA RESIDENT: Arizona is a good state, but no more now. COWAN: He took his 15-year-old son out of school and is headed back to Mexico, which brings Hugo to tears. But you’re really going to miss your friends? HUGO BOLANOS: Yeah. COWAN: And your school? (Hugo nods head) COWAN: It may be months before anyone knows for sure just how many illegal immigrants and their business the law has scared away. Supporters say good riddance, but critics fear the damage has already started. Lee Cowan, NBC News, Phoenix.

Continued here:
NBC Reporter Discovers New Immigration Law Causing Illegals to Leave Arizona