Tag Archives: picture

Nakedness in Boardwalk Empire of the Day

The Martin Scorcese directed show about Atlantic City, Prohibition, Prostitution, Gambling and the Mafia in the 1920s premiered last night on HBO, and since HBO likes making TV shows that are like movies, there was some titty in the Steve Buscemi sex scene….He’s the main character, a pretty sure sign this show is going to not only last, but be bigger than the Sopranos… I watched it, it was pretty good, but then again, I like all the seedy shit America is built on….cuz organized crime, smut, drinking and gambling are some of my favorite things… To See the First Episode of Boardwalk Empire – Follow this Link – To See the Sex Scene – Scroll to 46 minutes in…. GO

Excerpt from:
Nakedness in Boardwalk Empire of the Day

Paris Hilton Stolen in Court Picture of the Day

My friend Jenny who was the original brain behind a popular celebrity website before she got muscled out of it posted this picture of Paris Hilton in the Vegas courthouse today….cuz she got arrested a few weeks ago… She wrote: I was at the courthouse this morning and so was Paris Hilton. Best shot I could get of her. It’s blurry, but her ginormous feet are sort of in focus. The picture made me laugh, not as much as Paris Hilton getting off for hiding coke in her pussy instead of cock in her pussy cuz her pussy is a well trained circus act that can do all kinds of tricks… so I figured I’d share it with you idiots… Amateur style Investigative is like amateur porn….way better than the real thing…

See more here:
Paris Hilton Stolen in Court Picture of the Day

Rhian Sugden Picture Moment

On Today: Is The Tea Party Hurting The GOP?

It’s quite possible NBC’s Meredith Vieira has never shown more concern about the Republican Party’s ability to win elections than she did on Thursday’s Today show, of course that may be because conservative Tea Party candidates are now forcing out the more moderate members of its ranks. In a segment entitled, “Tea Time, Is The Tea Party Hurting The GOP?” the Today co-anchor invited on Republican Senator Jim DeMint to question if conservative candidates like Christine O’Donnell “can win in November?” To which DeMint responded that the conservative candidates he’s been supporting are doing just fine: “Well Meredith, they told me Marco Rubio couldn’t win. And he is blowing it away in Florida because he’s telling people the truth. And they said the same thing about Pat Toomey in Pennsylvania and Rand Paul in Kentucky. They’re well ahead in, in the polls because people want a change in Washington.” The following is the full interview with DeMint as it was aired on the September 16 Today show: MEREDITH VIEIRA: South Carolina Republican Senator Jim DeMint has endorsed a number of Tea Party candidates, including Delaware’s Christine O’Donnell. Senator DeMint, good morning to you. [On screen headline: ” Tea Time, Is The Tea Party Hurting The GOP?” ] SEN. JIM DEMINT: Hey good morning. VIEIRA: This morning’s New York Time notes the, New York Times, notes the clear divide within the Republican Party saying and I’m quoting here, “If ever there was proof that the Tea Party and the Republican Party do not necessarily go hand in hand, it is Christine O’Donnell’s victory over the establishment.” But the paper goes on to say that you, Senator, could be a model for how the two might coexist. How important is it to you, that this gap be bridged? DEMINT: It’s important because the Tea Party represents a broad cross section of the American people. And, and actually, it’s a small part of an American awakening of people who are concerned about the debt, the spending, massive growth of government and, and the takeovers. And, and really, what we’re doing here in Washington has united America. When I go to a Tea Party, 40 percent of the people there are independents and Democrats. And, and what I’m trying to do is help the Republicans here in Washington understand that the tea parties don’t want to be Republicans. We as Republicans need to embrace the ideas of balancing the budget, of trying to return some fiscal sanity here to Washington. You know and I’m not as concerned about what Christine O’Donnell said 14 years ago as I am that she’s gonna help us balance our budget here in Washington. VIEIRA: But, but, but Senator, if you’re trying to help your party, your party would argue that you’re really hurting the party. That these kinds of candidates cannot win general elections. DEMINT: Well the important thing to me, first, is to save our country. It’s really that critical. That these trivial political labels do not mean as much right now when we’re fighting for the survival versus the bankruptcy of our country. And I think the American people in Delaware, all over the country, want to see that sense of urgency from the people who represent them in Washington. They’re not concerned whether the Republicans get the majority or not, they want people in Washington who understand that balancing the checkbook is not an extreme idea. So- VIEIRA: But practically speaking, do you believe that these candidates can win in November? DEMINT: Well Meredith, they told me Marco Rubio couldn’t win. And he is blowing it away in Florida because he’s telling people the truth. And they said the same thing about Pat Toomey in Pennsylvania and Rand Paul in Kentucky. They’re well ahead in, in the polls because people want a change in Washington. And, and you really can’t change Washington unless you change the people who are here. And so I think that’s what you saw in Delaware, people are looking at what these candidates are going to do when they get to Washington, and they’re ready to throw out the bums and bring in new folks. And I think we’re gonna do that in November. VIEIRA: Are you ready, if these candidates were to be elected, or if the Republicans were to come into power or take over Congress, obviously, control of Congress, are you ready to take on a leadership role to challenge the current Republican leadership? DEMINT: Well I like our current leadership. Mitch, Mitch is doing a great job and so is John Cornyn, with our Senate committee. I’ve got the leadership role I want. I am head of the conservative steering committee within the Senate. I’m managing the Senate Conservatives Fund, which by the way is SenateConservatives.com if folks want to help some of these candidates. But I want to support our leadership team. And what we’re trying to do now is get a group of Republicans that provide a clear contrast with the Pelosi-Obama agenda, which is massive debt and government growth. I think- VIEIRA: Before I let you go, Senator, can I ask very, very quickly, you’re up for reelection this November and your Democratic opponent, Alvin Greene, has said repeatedly, that he would, he would want to debate you. Is that gonna happen? Will you debate him? DEMINT: We have no debates scheduled. And I’ve got a couple of opponents in South Carolina. But Meredith, my main opponents are here in the White House and in Congress. So that’s where I’m spending most of my time. VIEIRA: Alright. So that’s a no. Senator Jim DeMint, thank you very much. DEMINT: Thank you.

Continue reading here:
On Today: Is The Tea Party Hurting The GOP?

Harsh Attacks Against Christine O’Donnell Continue on ABC: Carville Slams ‘Deadbeat’ Nominee

For the second day in a row, Good Morning America featured degrading descriptions of Delaware senatorial candidate Christine O’Donnell. Democratic strategist James Carville appeared on Thursday’s show and fumed about the Republican’s past financial problems: ” Christine O’Donnell doesn’t believe in spending, particularly her own money, because, she’s a deadbeat. She doesn’t pay her loans back .” Wednesday’s GMA included host George Stephanopoulos reading quotes against the “mentally unhinged” “liar.” The show on Thursday showcased an extended conversation on masturbation and remarks O’Donnell made about the subject in 1996. Stephanopoulos played a clip and then Carville joked, “And she equated masturbation to adultery. And, boy, if that’s the case, the Iranians would be stoning a lot of people in this country.” In fairness, after playing the snippet of O’Donnell’s 14-year-old comment, the ABC host wondered, “But, I think a lot of people might watch [the clip] and say, what’s wrong with she said?” The segment also featured conservative radio host and Tea Party activist Dana Loesch who chided, “She’s talking about masturbation. It’s not like she’s wearing black socks and getting caught in hotel rooms with call girls and stuff. If we want to point fingers on bedroom antics, we can do that.” Stephanopoulos did bring up the gloom hanging over the Democrats in the midterm, but he turned to the subject of whether the “extreme views” of Tea Partiers will “cost Republican seats that they otherwise would have won.” A transcript of the September 16 segment, which aired at 7:05am EDT, follows: GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: Let’s get into the debate now. We’re joined now from St. Louis, Missouri, by radio talk show host and tea party activist, Dana Loesch. And from Washington, Democratic strategist James Carville. And, Dana, let me begin with you. You saw Joe Biden out there last night. There’s the White House message. Moderates need not apply to the Republican Party. DAN LOESCH: Well, I’ve seen several elections where moderates in the Democrat Party have been run out on a rail, like Elijah Lovejoy. What we’re seeing with the Republican Party in the particular case of Mike Castle, I think calling him a moderate is especially generous. This guy’s record was indistinguishable from the Democrat to which he wanted to run against in the general election. And what we saw- This was the people of Delaware that spoke. This wasn’t a group of Republicans. They tried to nominate Mike Castle. But, the primaries are all about getting the people’s voice out there. That’s what we saw in this primary with Christine O’Donnell. And the people made their voices heard that they were unhappy with Mike Castle’s record. STEPHANOPOULOS: And, James, there is some evidence out there that Tea Party is not just on the fringes right now. Want to show you the numbers from our latest Washington Post/ABC News poll. It shows that Tea Party supporters now make up 44 percent of the primary electorate. Those who really, strongly support the Tea Party, almost a quarter of the electorate. And these guys overwhelmingly are focused on Democrats. 92 percent Of them believe that Democrats don’t deserve re-election. That is a warning sign for the Democrats in November. JAMES CARVILLE: Well, certainly. And congratulations. The Tea Party- This comports with the research we did at the Democracy Corps. The Tea Party is more powerful to the Republican Party than African-Americans and organized labor combined are in the Democratic Party. And you’re exactly right, George. People like Christine O’Donnell are part of the mainstream Republican Party right now. If you look at what happened in New York State. Elijah Lovejoy? What about Robert Bennett? What about Murkowski in Alaska? What about Mike Castle? I mean, been these people have been going on about Elijah Lovejoy, but I know what’s happening over there. And the Tea Party is the Republican Party. This is not a fringe element of the Republican Party. This woman, O’Donnell, is right in the middle of it. And it’s exactly right. They are a very, very powerful force. And they’re running that party right now. STEPHANOPOULOS: And, Dana, the Democrats are hoping that candidates supported by the Tea Party, candidates like Sharron Angle in Nevada, like Rand Paul, like Christine O’Donnell, because they lack experience or have what some would consider extreme views, will cost Republican seats that they otherwise would have won. LOESCH: I don’t know if they have extreme views. I don’t think the Tea Party movement is mainstream- I think it’s mainstream America, period. We’ve seen so much data coming up from the past year, that the majority of Americans, they believe that the Democrat congressional agenda is too extreme. They identify with the individual liberty and smaller government that the grassroots movement espouses. And candidates like Sharron Angle and Rand Paul, these are people- it’s not beltway experience or abstain that they don’t have. It’s the fact they’re standing up for principles that the majority of Americans want. I want the government out of my pocketbook and my bedroom, and everything else. And hat’s what the majority of Americans want. That’s the platform that these candidates stand upon. STEPHANOPOULOS: As someone wrote in the Wall Street Journal this morning, James, it’s the spending, stupid. CARVILLE: Well, clearly, Christine O’Donnell doesn’t believe in spending, particularly her own money, because, she’s a deadbeat. She doesn’t pay her loans back. There’s a lien on her house. We could really classify her as anti-spending . In terms of getting in the bedroom this, woman has run against masturbation. I don’t- That seems to be a lot of government intrusion, to be honest with you. It’s right in the New York Times this morning. I’m sorry. She’s really against spending. She’s not going to spend any of her own money. But again this, is the Republican Party. It’s anti-spending. It’s promoting a bunch of deadbeats. STEPHANOPOULOS: I think we have the clip that James may be referring to. So, why don’t I show that and get you to respond? Here it was, I think, in 1996 on MTV O’DONNELL: The reason that you don’t tell them that masturbation is the answer to AIDS and all these other problems that come with sex outside of marriage is because, again, it is not addressing the issue. You’re going to be pleasing each other. And if he already knows what pleases him and he can please himself, then why am I in the picture? STEPHANOPOULOS: James brought it up. But, I think a lot of people might watch it and say, what’s wrong with she said? LOESCH: Yeah. She’s talking about masturbation. It’s not like she’s wearing black socks and getting caught in hotel rooms with call girls and stuff. If we want to point fingers on bedroom antics, we can do that. I mean, this is- She didn’t say anything- some of the stuff she said in her past, I don’t think anybody, if you look back at the history of everything Mr. Carville has said and, George, you and myself, not everyone is going to be perfect. Perfection, if it were required for public office, nobody would be fit to run. But, I don’t like the class warfare, sort of, angle that Karl Rove seemed to have taken when he was speaking about her. That’s something that bugged me a little bit. STEPHANOPOULOS: James, you get ten seconds to end this. CARVILLE: Well, look, again, like I said, she’s a very fiscal conservative. She doesn’t believe in paying her bills. And she equated masturbation to adultery. And, boy, if that’s the case, the Iranians would be stoning a lot of people in this country. I’ll tell you that.

Read the original:
Harsh Attacks Against Christine O’Donnell Continue on ABC: Carville Slams ‘Deadbeat’ Nominee

Immortal: Portraits of Naked, Beautiful Youth

“Immortal” is a stunning work of photo-based art by the Parisian photographer Vee Speers, a work which creates a new world that merges Mona Lisa charm and mystery, with the melancholy of Dorian Gray. At once alluring and disquieting, these portraits of naked, beautiful young people are set against backdrops of Eden-like natural beauty, or scenes of post-apocalyptic destruction. What makes “Immortal” work so well is the direct gaze that Speers elicits from her subjects. The look is genuine, whether it’s detached, disdainful, modest, defiant, arrogant, melancholy, worried, or puffed up with peacock machismo. These Immortals are all like tragic fallen angels, eyes opened with animal intelligence, looking out onto an uncertain future, not even aware of how perfectly beautiful they appear to be right now. This piece includes a number of high-resolution color photographs, a remarkable slide show and the short film, “The Picture of Dorian Gray.” http://disembedded.wordpress.com/2010/09/16/photos-of-the-day-portraits-of-naked… added by: disembedded

Essential Killing: Dear Vincent Gallo, Why Do You Torment Me So?

Oh, Vincent Gallo! There’s no escaping you. You follow me from continent to continent, from festival to festival. Last week, in Venice, I saw your strange little picture Promises Written in Water (also playing here in Toronto), and while I wasn’t wowed, I couldn’t quite dismiss it, either. But while in Venice, I missed Polish filmmaker Jerzy Skolimowski’s Essential Killing, which netted you the Best Actor award there — in fact, you’ve got pretty much the only role, aside from Emmanuelle Seigner, who appears very late in the picture. So today in Toronto, I decided to check out Essential Killing. I needed to see for myself if you really deserved that award, you scalawag, you.

See the original post here:
Essential Killing: Dear Vincent Gallo, Why Do You Torment Me So?

Anna Kournikova in a Bikini for Maxim of the Day

I didn’t get into the VMAs because no one was willing to help me because I am insignificant. I did almost die on my hitched ride home at 2 am because I didn’t really have the chance to interview the motherfuckers for sanity or to do a background check on them to see if they had a criminal record when I met them in a bar at they offered me a lift home…… Anna Kournikova did get into a bikini for Maxim, because Maxim will feature anyone because they are insignificant and holding on by a thread because they almost died or are dying thanks to the internet….. I’ve heard people still have a thing for her….10 years too late…but they still can’t ignore that lust they once felt, so maybe Maxim isn’t all about has-beens and bottom feeders looking for attention, like the magazine version of Dancing with the Stars, but more about bitches who have fans that will never give up on them….because they are obsessive and weird… It really doesn’t fucking matter….who fucking cares…here is the picture….

Follow this link:
Anna Kournikova in a Bikini for Maxim of the Day

A Picture is Worth…South African Campaign For Sustainable Fisheries

Terrific ad campaign by the World Wildlife Fund in South Africa and SASSI , the South African Sustainable Seafood Foundation to encourage people to eat fish caught in an environmentally friendly manner that avoids bycatch. … Read the full story on TreeHugger

Go here to read the rest:
A Picture is Worth…South African Campaign For Sustainable Fisheries

Joaquin Phoenix’s ‘I’m Still Here’: The Reviews Are In

Mixed opinions for a film about the actor’s retirement and apparent public breakdown. By Adam Rosenberg Joaquin Phoenix in “I’m Still Here” Photo: Magnolia Pictures Late in 2008, Oscar-winning actor Joaquin Phoenix opened up on a red carpet to Extra with a bold pronouncement: “I want to take this opportunity … also to give you the exclusive and just talk a little bit about the fact that this will be my last performance as an actor … I’m not doing films anymore.” He went on to say that he would be shifting his energies to building a career in music. A seeming breakdown followed. A big beard appeared, bushy and unkempt. Disheveled hair, sticking out in every direction thanks to untended-to tangles and dreadlocks. Baffling and downright embarrassing public appearances . Assurances from Phoenix and people around him that his attempts to become a rapper were 100% sincere . The entire spectacle was filmed by Casey Affleck, who collected the footage into the newly released film “I’m Still Here.” Charting the year-plus following the actor’s retirement, the movie stitches together a rough narrative of what ostensibly went on behind the scenes during that period. Now the movie is in theaters for a limited release, with a wide release to follow next Friday, and reviews are pouring in. Opinions are mixed overall, but every review at least alludes to the question hanging over the film: Was this all just a big method acting experiment? Or a hoax? “It almost doesn’t matter if the psyche in question is imploding artificially — as in staged — or organically,” Claudia Puig writes in USA Today , sidestepping that central issue and judging “I’m Still Here” as a work of film. “It’s just so unpleasant to watch two hours of unrelenting bad behavior and grandiose delusions.” Dana Stevens, writing for Slate , has a similar response. She opens with a knockout punch: “The worst thing about ‘I’m Still Here’ is the fact that it exists,” going on to later conclude, “Joaquin Phoenix may be the one going under, but it was Casey Affleck whose pockets I felt like stuffing with rocks.” Village Voice writer Karina Longworth addresses the film’s hype directly. “Perhaps it goes without saying that ‘Here’ was more provocative when it couldn’t be seen, when it existed for most of us purely in the realm of rumor.” She points to an early report claiming — falsely — that the film would contain “more male frontal nudity than you’d find in some gay porn.” Roger Ebert, writing for the Chicago Sun-Times acknowledges the film’s faults in little more than a sentence, focusing instead on the subject and the picture of him that is painted. “Phoenix comes across as a narcissist interested only in himself,” Ebert writes. “He is bored with acting. He was only a puppet. He can no longer stand where he’s told, wear what he’s given, say what is written. It’s not him. He has lost contact with his inner self.” Ebert’s write-up is less a review and more a personal appeal to a talented performer. While he admits that he will be “seriously pissed” if this all turns out to be a hoax, he ultimately concludes, “In ‘I’m Still Here’ all [Phoenix] proves is that he is hurtling toward the same pointless oblivion that killed his brother River. It is a waste of the privilege of life.” It is Entertainment Weekly critic Owen Gleiberman who most effectively cuts through the hype and strikes at the core of what audiences are likely seeing in “I’m Still Here.” He writes, “Affleck uses Phoenix’s descent to forge a riveting — and, in its way, cautionary — case study of a celebrity self-destructively addicted to his own psychodrama. Phoenix may say that he’s left acting behind, but whether he’s trolling the Internet for hookers, trying (hilariously) to convince Diddy to produce his rap album, getting huffy with an entertainment journalist at a junket for ‘Two Lovers,’ or lashing out at fame while still enjoying all of its perks, the movie understands that his Last Honest Man in Showbiz routine is really a performance — even if it’s one the actor himself is only dimly aware of.” Check out everything we’ve got on “I’m Still Here.” For breaking news, celebrity columns, humor and more — updated around the clock — visit MTVMoviesBlog.com .

Read more here:
Joaquin Phoenix’s ‘I’m Still Here’: The Reviews Are In