Tag Archives: police

87-year-old woman dies after standoff with deputies, who shoot her with a stun gun!

This happened in the county that I live in! It doesn't seem to be to important to the national news but stop and think about it. An 87 year old women being stunned to death by the police. What the fuck is happening to our police forces. added by: kennymotown

Ex-officer found guilty of manslaughter in Oakland subway shooting

(CNN) — A former police officer who is white was found guilty of involuntary manslaughter Thursday in the killing of an unarmed black man in Oakland, California. Johannes Mehserle, who was a Bay Area Rapid Transit police officer at the time of the incident, was convicted in the shooting of 22-year-old Oscar Grant on a California train platform on January 1, 2009. Mehserle, who was on duty at the time, said at the trial that he intended to draw and fire his Taser rather than his gun, CNN affiliate KTVU reported. The shooting was captured on a bystander's cell-phone video camera. The video was widely circulated, and it spurred several protests and riots in and around Oakland. added by: TimALoftis

A 31-year-old woman posed as a 14-year-old boy to lure a 16-year-old girl for sex.

Police say a 31-year-old woman pretended to be a 14-year-old boy to be with a 16-year-old girl. Watch Video ›› http://www.wftv.com/video/24182439/index.html added by: MotherForTruth

The Big Banks Are Coming For Your Retirement Money

They got their bailouts. They made their bonuses. They bought the politicians who promised you reform. Now, they want more. They're having their way with America and the world, and they'll keep having their way so long as people continue to turn a blind eye. Stop supporting your destroyers. http://www.infowars.com/banksters-are-coming-for-your-retirement-next/ added by: ScottyT

Repeal The Drinking Age

Somehow, and no one seems to even imagine how, this country managed to survive and thrive before 1984 without a national minimum drinking age. Before that, the drinking question was left to the states. In the 19th century, and looking back even before — prepare yourself to imagine horrific anarchistic nightmares — there were no drinking laws anywhere, so far as anyone can tell. The regulation of drinking and age was left to society, which is to say families, churches, and communities with varying sensibilities who regulated such things with varying degrees of intensity. Probably some kids drank themselves silly — and we all know that this doesn't happen now (wink, wink) — but many others learned to drink responsibly from an early age, even drinking bourbon for breakfast. Really, it is only because we are somehow used to it that we accept the complete absurdity of a national law that prohibits the sale of beer, wine, and liquor to anyone under the age of 21. This is a restriction unknown in the developed world. Most countries set 18 as the limit, and countries like Germany and Austria allow 16-year-olds to buy wine and beer. In the home of the brave, the police are busting up teen parties, shutting down bars, hectoring restaurants, fining convenience stores, and otherwise bullying people into clean living. We read….. http://mises.org/daily/4559 added by: shanklinmike

‘Overheated Hysteria’: New York Times Editorial Goes All-Out to Attack Arizona Immigration Law

per·ni·cious pər-‘ni-shəs adj .: highly injurious or destructive : deadly Sounds like a pretty harsh word to describe something, right? So whatever the word pernicious is describing must be pretty bad. But leave it to The New York Times editorial board to throw this lingo around like it’s no big deal. In a July 8 over-the-top editorial , the Times ripped the Arizona anti-illegal immigration law over its constitutionality. “The Obama administration has not always been completely clear about its immigration agenda, but it was forthright Tuesday when it challenged the pernicious Arizona law that allows the police to question the immigration status of people they detain for local violations,” the editorial said. “Only the federal government can set or enforce immigration policy, the government said in its lawsuit against the state, and ‘Arizona has crossed this constitutional line.'” Video Below Fold The editorial goes on to whine that the Arizona legislation interferes with the federal government’s ability to enforce immigration law, as if everything is operating so swimmingly under the Obama administration’s direction. But a July 7 post from the Heritage Foundation’s The Foundry blog explains the unconstitutionality claim “nonsense”: First, the Justice Department claims that Arizona is unconstitutionally interfering with the federal government’s authority to set immigration policy. This claim is nonsense. Arizona is not interfering with the federal government’s immigration policy as it is set in the laws passed by Congress. Arizona is simply complementing and helping the federal government enforce its immigration laws. On the other hand, states that give illegal aliens drivers licenses and sanctuary cities like San Francisco that help illegal aliens violate immigration laws do interfere with federal law, but, as evidenced by the lack of federal lawsuits in those cases, this Administration has no interest in suing to stop that kind of interference. The Obama Administration thus appears to only be interested in stopping enforcement of federal law, not its violation. But the Times editorial suggests the Obama administration act against the Arizona government by restricting their ability to enforce the new law. “In the meantime, there are steps President Obama can take,” the editorial said. “He can deny Arizona access to federal databases of immigration status and refuse to allow the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency to cooperate with state officials in handling people detained under the law. The government should end the misguided program allowing local deputies to enforce immigration law after taking an educational course.” On the Fox Business Network’s July 8 broadcast of “Imus in the Morning,” Newsweek and National Journal contributing editor Stuart Taylor, of all people even criticized the Times for its “overheated hysteria.” ” It struck me the exact same way when I read The New York Times as usual this morning and yeah, that word [pernicious] jumped off the page at me and it is typical of The New York Times, overheated hysteria, I think ,” Taylor said. “I tend to agree the law has got problems and is troublesome and that it may be unconstitutional and I think it’s going to be a close call how the courts handle it. But it’s also, a law where you can certainly understand why the people of Arizona think it is a good idea. They’re being overrun by illegal immigrants and their hospitals are full of them. Their schools are full of them. They’re drug dealers in the house next door sometimes. And so the state decided they needed to do something about it. The federal government is not doing much about it but, there are problems with how the state’s law would operate and there are problems of what you call federal preemption that would interfere with federal immigration law. But pernicious is overkill. ”

Read more:
‘Overheated Hysteria’: New York Times Editorial Goes All-Out to Attack Arizona Immigration Law

Drake ‘Good Morning America’ Concert Falls Through

Cast of Broadway’s ‘American Idiot’ will perform July 16 instead. By Mawuse Ziegbe Drake Photo: George Pimentel/ WireImage Another Drake show in New York has been nixed before the rapper even got a chance to take the stage. Drizzy was in talks to play a free outdoor show July 16 as part of ABC’s “Good Morning America” summer concert series. However, the Drake show has been squashed and the cast of Broadway’s “American Idiot” will fill the upcoming slot instead. A spokesperson for ABC confirmed that a potential Drake show was in the works. “We were interested in having Drake perform, but he was never officially booked,” an ABC rep told MTV News. In addition, a spokesperson for the New York City Department of Parks & Recreation told MTV News that concert organizers had simply decided to go with another act. “There was an open date on the calendar for July 16, but they decided to feature the cast of the Broadway show ‘American Idiot,’ ” a rep said. A rep for Drizzy also told the New York Daily News that there was a “booking in place” but did not offer any additional details. Reports have surfaced indicating that safety might have been a factor in passing on Drizzy for a “GMA” appearance. According to the Daily News, the New York City Police Department pulled the plug on the planned show after the city’s parks department failed to provide the security that the NYPD deemed necessary for such an event. The parks department spokesperson did not confirm whether security issues were a factor in not moving forward with the Drake show. The news comes in the wake of a Drake concert in NYC that was canceled June 15 when thousands of fans unexpectedly showed up. Drizzy was expected to perform a free show at New York’s South Street Seaport (pop group Hanson were also on the bill ), but the NYPD put the kibosh on the concert after roughly 10,000 fans swarmed the event. Days later, Jay-Z also ran into issues mounting a concert on top of the marquee of New York’s Ed Sullivan Theater for an appearance on the “Late Show With David Letterman.” City officials axed the surprise concert once fans got wind of the show beforehand. However, Jigga — joined by Eminem — ultimately finagled an outdoor appearance and performed on the building’s roof . The MCs didn’t need a permit to rock out on the roof since it is private property. Are you bummed that Drake won’t be on “Good Morning America”? Let us know in the comments. Related Videos ‘Drake: Better Than Good Enough’ Related Photos Drake’s Style: From A To Drizzy Related Artists Drake

See the article here:
Drake ‘Good Morning America’ Concert Falls Through

Widow Lived With Corpses Of Husband And Twin Sister, Say Police

WYALUSING, Pa. (AP)– The 91-year-old widow lived by herself in a tumbledown house on a desolate country road. But she wasn't alone, not really, not as long as she could visit her husband and twin sister. No matter they were already dead. Jean Stevens simply had their embalmed corpses dug up and stored them at her house — in the case of her late husband, for more than a decade — tending to the remains as best she could until police were finally tipped off last month. Much to her dismay. “Death is very hard for me to take,” Stevens told an interviewer. As state police finish their investigation into a singularly macabre case — no charges have been filed — Stevens wishes she could be reunited with James Stevens, her husband of nearly 60 years who died in 1999, and June Stevens, the twin who died last October. But their bodies are with the Bradford County coroner now, off-limits to the woman who loved them best. From time to time, stories of exhumed bodies are reported, but rarely do those involved offer an explanation. Jean Stevens, seeming more grandmother than ghoul, holds little back as she describes what happened outside this small town in northern Pennsylvania's Endless Mountains. She knows what people must think of her. But she had her reasons, and they are complicated, a bit sad, and in their own peculiar way, sweet. Dressed smartly in a light blue shirt and khaki skirt, silver hoops in her ears, her white hair swept back and her brown eyes clear and sharp, she offers a visitor a slice of pie, then casts a knowing look when it's declined. “You're afraid I'll poison you,” she says. On a highboy in the corner of the dining room rests a handsome, black-and-white portrait of Jean, then a stunner in her early 20s, and James, clad in his Army uniform. It was taken after their 1942 marriage but before his service in World War II, in which he fought in the Battle of the Bulge. After the war, James worked at a General Electric Corp. plant in Liverpool, N.Y., then as an auto mechanic. He succumbed to Parkinson's disease on May 21, 1999. Next to that photo there is a smaller color snapshot of Jean and June, taken when they were in their late 80s. In many ways, Jean shared a closer bond with her twin than her husband. Though June lived more than 200 miles away in West Hartford, Conn., they talked by phone several times a week, and June wrote often. The twins — who, as it happened, married brothers — were honored guests at the 70th reunion of the Camptown High School Class of 1937. Then, last year, June was diagnosed with cancer. She was in a lot of pain when Jean came to visit. The sisters shared a bed, and Jean rubbed her back. “I'm real glad you're here,” June said. On Oct. 3, June died. She was buried in her sister's backyard — but not for long. “I think when you put them in the (ground), that's goodbye, goodbye,” Stevens said. “In this way I could touch her and look at her and talk to her.” She kept her sister, who was dressed in her “best housecoat,” on an old couch in a spare room off the bedroom. Jean sprayed her with expensive perfume that was June's favorite. “I'd go in, and I'd talk, and I'd forget,” Stevens said. “I put glasses on her. When I put the glasses on, it made all the difference in the world. I would fix her up. I'd fix her face up all the time.” She offered a similar rationale for keeping her husband on a couch in the detached garage. James, who had been laid to rest in a nearby cemetery, wore a dark suit, white shirt and blue knitted tie. “I could see him, I could look at him, I could touch him. Now, some people have a terrible feeling, they say, 'Why do you want to look at a dead person? Oh my gracious,'” she said. “Well, I felt differently about death.” Part of her worries that after death, there's … nothing. “Is that the grand finale?” But then she gets up at night and gazes at the stars in the sky and the deer in the fields, and she thinks, “There must be somebody who created this. It didn't come up like mushrooms.” So she is ambivalent about God and the afterlife. “I don't always go to church, but I want to believe,” Stevens said. Dr. Helen Lavretsky, a psychiatry professor at UCLA who researches how the elderly view death and dying, said people who aren't particularly spiritual or religious often have a difficult time with death because they fear that death is truly the end. For them, “death doesn't exist,” she said. “They deny death.” Stevens, she said, “came up with a very extreme expression of it. She got her bodies back, and she felt fulfilled by having them at home. She's beating death by bringing them back.” There was another reason that Stevens wanted them above ground. She is severely claustrophobic and so was her sister; she was horrified that the bodies of her loved ones would spend eternity in a casket in the ground. “That's suffocation to me, even though you aren't breathing,” she said. So she said she had them dug up, both within days of burial. She managed to escape detection for a long time. The neighbors who mowed her lawn and took her grocery shopping either didn't know or didn't tell. Otherwise forthcoming, Stevens is vague when asked about who exhumed the bodies and who knew of her odd living arrangement. She blames a relative of her late husband's for calling the authorities about the corpses. “I think that is dirty, rotten,” she said. State police — who haven't yet released the identities of those who retrieved the bodies — will soon present their findings to the Bradford County district attorney. A decision on charges is expected in a few weeks. Stevens has talked extensively with both the police and Bradford County Coroner Tom Carman, who calls it a “very, very bizarre case.” But the coroner has nothing but kind things to say about the woman at the center of it. “I got quite an education, to say the least. She's 100 percent cooperative — and a pleasure to talk to,” Carman said. “But as far as her psyche, I'll leave that to the experts.” added by: TimALoftis

Kelly Soo Park picture(Juliana Redding Murder)

According to authorities, the murder suspect – 44-year-old Kelly Soo Park – was paid $250,000 three weeks before the slaying and had another $113,000 wired to her relatives through a South Korean bank a few days before her arrest, The Los Angeles Times reports. Then last week came a break, with a twist: Police arrested a Camarillo, Calif., woman in the murder. Authorities have not officially said what happened, but there are hints that the murder may have been linked to her father#39;s business

Link:
Kelly Soo Park picture(Juliana Redding Murder)

Miley Cyrus’ Boyfriend is a Sex Offender of the Day

I don’t really get American sex offender laws. You see her boyfriend is 20 and there is no way he isn’t fucking her brains out on the daily, but for some reason he doesn’t get arrested as a sex offender, but a friend of mine convinced a 17 year old girl to meet him for a late night blowjob in the park down in Florida a few years ago, and when he got there the police were waiting and the only blowjob he got was with his ass in prison… It’s like the rules don’t apply to Hollywood and I guess it’s not fair to the rest of you, but I live in Canada and up until last year, I coulda fucked a 14 year old legally and luckily for the 14 year olds in the world, the law moved to 16, an age where girls actually have tight bodies, and don’t look like pubescent boys 2 periods into adulthood, so I don’t really care, I’d just like to see motherfucker get locked up as an example…instead of some nobody hustling girls off the internet…but that’s not gonna happen, so here are the pics of her tanline he cums on because he can instead…. Here she is sitting like a dude…. Here she is leaving the gym with her bra exposed…. Pics via Fame

Read more from the original source:
Miley Cyrus’ Boyfriend is a Sex Offender of the Day