Tag Archives: political

Pope Calls for “World Political Authority”

[Note: this is a story from last year, im just posting it for personal reference] Pope Benedict XVI called for a “true world political authority” to manage the economy in his new encyclical on social justice. The encyclical, entitled “Charity in Truth,” was released by the Vatican on Tuesday and signed by the pope a day earlier. Benedict’s encyclical specifically called for “regulation of the financial sector,” and a “worldwide redistribution of energy resources.” Benedict added that “the State’s role seems destined to grow” if his political prescription is followed. “There is urgent need of a true world political authority,” Benedict wrote in the 30,000-word encyclical, calling for “reform of the United Nations Organization, and likewise of economic institutions and international finance, so that the concept of the family of nations can acquire real teeth.” Benedict described what a powerful world government with teeth would look like: “Such an authority would need to be universally recognized and to be vested with the effective power to ensure security for all.” He added: “Obviously it would have to have the authority to ensure compliance with its decisions from all parties” — that is, nations. At best, Benedict is proposing a global federation that would improve upon the U.S. Constitution’s checks and balances. “Such an authority would need to be regulated by law, to observe consistently the principles of subsidiarity,” Benedict says. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Pope,_13_march_2007.jpg http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/culture/education/1375 added by: ibrake4rappers13

WaPo Applauds Obama for Not Choosing ‘Outspoken Liberals’ for Supreme Court

On the day confirmation hearings begin for Obama Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan, The Washington Post stresses on the front page that Kagan has been an “elusive GOP target.” The Post website summarized: “Republicans have struggled to find a compelling line of attack to take against the Supreme Court nominee. But their efforts have largely failed.” When Republicans nominate a Supreme Court justice, it’s the liberal media that aids their favorite activists in creating “compelling lines of attack.” But when Democrats do it, the journalists not only skip over the attacks, they also praise the Democrats for their political skills. Post reporters Anne Kornblut and Paul Kane suggested that the oil spill and the McChrystal hubbub have pushed Kagan out of attention, but also lauded the “skilled operatives” of Team Obama:   But it is also a measure of how skilled operatives have become at managing the process — and choosing nominees who are notable in part for their political blandness….  In part, the attention has been muted because Obama has not chosen outspoken liberals in either of his first two opportunities to influence the makeup of the court. Kagan, who would replace Justice John Paul Stevens, would not tilt the court’s ideological balance. So the stakes are lower than if she had been picked to replace a conservative, participants on both sides said. She is also an especially elusive target: a politically savvy operator who has no record of judicial rulings and has spent much of her career carefully positioning herself for the next step. Who else is elusive to the Post? Conservative activists, who are nowhere to be found in the Kornblut-Kane story — unlike a liberal lobbyist for People for the American Way. (Sen. Jeff Sessions is the only opposition figure quoted.) This claim, that Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor are baronesses of “blandness,” too “elusive” to be identified as liberals, is simply bizarre. To say that Sotomayor’s lobbying at left-wing Latino organizations or Kagan’s clerking for ultraliberal Justice Thurgood Marshall isn’t identifiably liberal is counter-factual. For contrast, please see The Washington Post’s front page story on Bush Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito on the first day of his confirmation hearings on January 9, 2006. He was a staunch Reaganite. The story relentlessly repeated how conservative he was. “Blandness” was not on the menu. Reporters Jo Becker and Dale Russakoff began:  The captains of the Reagan revolution at the Justice Department had two big concerns about a bookish new recruit named Samuel A. Alito Jr., who arrived in 1981: his blank slate as a conservative activist and his pedigree from a perceived bastion of legal liberalism. “I wouldn’t let most people from Yale Law School wash my car, let alone write my briefs,” said Michael A. Carvin, a political deputy at the department. Six years later, the revolutionaries saw Alito as one of them, tapping him to become U.S. attorney in New Jersey in 1987 and eventually, they hoped, a judge. Speaking on a New Jersey public affairs television program, the young prosecutor showcased the philosophy that had won the confidence of his Washington mentors. Asked his opinion of President Ronald Reagan’s nomination of Robert H. Bork to the Supreme Court, Alito gave a ringing defense of the conservative icon he said had been “unjustifiably rejected” by the Senate in one of the most ideologically polarizing nomination battles in decades. There weren’t any professional liberal activists in the piece — other than the Post reporters themselves.

More here:
WaPo Applauds Obama for Not Choosing ‘Outspoken Liberals’ for Supreme Court

GOP Walks Tightrope of Contradictions Over BP Gulf Spill (Video)

Photo via TBO The biggest splash in politics last week, at least ’round the blogoshpere and cable news circuit, was undoubtedly Representative Joe Barton’s (R-Texas) surprise apology to BP . While many conservatives supported his sentiment, many others immediately recognized the political damage it could cause, and rushed to distance themselves from the apology. The whole debacle underscores the contradiction-laden tightrope that GOP leaders must walk: The party must … Read the full story on TreeHugger

The rest is here:
GOP Walks Tightrope of Contradictions Over BP Gulf Spill (Video)

Three Things That Will Change Radically With Climate: Drug & Alcohol Use, & FEMA’s Budget

Image credit: FloodDamage.Data.org I probably could have listed other things that will increase commensurate with climate change: like doomsday cults, prohibitionist movements and radical political groups, for example. But I wanted to focus on investment and budget control opportunities people are overlooking. Let’s start by analyzing the latter. In their 2002 paper, The Political Economy of FEMA Disaster Payments, (pdf file) Garrett & Sobel examined whether congressional and presidential influences affect … Read the full story on TreeHugger

Read more:
Three Things That Will Change Radically With Climate: Drug & Alcohol Use, & FEMA’s Budget

ABC: Stephanopoulos and Carville Hope Obama Can ‘Hit Reset Button’ on Oil Spill, ‘Contain Political Damage’

On Monday’s Good Morning America on ABC, co-host George Stephanopoulos discussed President Obama’s response to the Gulf oil spill with Democratic strategist James Carville: “Probably no one has been tougher than you on this White House on this response. The President now going back for his forth trip. He’s ratcheted up the rhetoric over the weekend. Is this what you’ve been waiting for?” Stephanopoulos was referring to Carville’s criticism of Obama on the May 26 broadcast : “And it just looks like he’s not involved in this!…We’re about to die down here!” During his Monday appearance, the on-screen headline read: “Carville Demands Justice; Gulf ‘Abused and Neglected'” However, on Monday, Carville struck a more complimentary tone toward the President, remarking that Tuesday’s prime time Oval Office address on the spill could allow Obama “to hit the reset button.” Near the end of the segment, Stephanopoulos, a former Democratic strategist himself, asked Carville: “…put on your strategist hat here, has the President contained the political damage?” Carville reiterated: “I think he can hit this reset button tomorrow night. I think he can not contain the political damage, I think he can eliminate the damage. I actually think done properly, there’s political value in this, I think that he can help himself a great deal.” While hoping for Obama’s political comeback, Carville did speak out against the moratorium on offshore oil drilling: “[Gulf residents are] definitely concerned about this moratorium. This is wrecking the economy down here. What has to be done to get this lifted? How soon can we expect that?” Stephanopoulos continued to tow the liberal line: “…do you really think that’s wise given the kind of dangers we’re seeing with very deep water drilling?” Carville called for more regulation, but concluded: “I think it’s essential to the economy down here….you take fishing and you take petroleum away from this, you don’t have a whole lot left.” Here is a full transcript of the June 14 exchange: 7:08AM EST             GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: We’re going to turn now to James Carville, he is down in New Orleans. Good morning, again, James. Probably no one has been tougher than you on this White House on this response. The President now going back for his forth trip. He’s ratcheted up the rhetoric over the weekend. Is this what you’ve been waiting for? [ON-SCREEN HEADLINE: Carville Demands Justice; Gulf “Abused and Neglected”] JAMES CARVILLE: Well, I hope so, and I think he has a chance to hit the reset button tomorrow night. And there certainly is going to be a lot of interest, a lot of anticipation in what he’s going to say. Doug Brinkley has been reporting that the Secretary of Interior said that he’s going to address the issue of our vanishing coastline and have a massive public works project. If that’s true, that’s going to be greeted with – embraced down here and greeted with great approval. But we’ve got to see, and I think people are very, very anxious. I think they want to hear what the President has to say. And I guarantee you, he’s going to have to have a lot of eyes that are glued to the television set tomorrow night. I mean, this is good news. They say they’re going to capture 50,000 barrels and I think that they’re moving in that direction. But last week, we we’re told that the high point was 40,000. So I think these sensors will give people a good, good indication of what’s on there. And hopefully, the scientists can give us a definitive answer because every answer we’ve gotten has been wrong so far. But I’m very encouraged by what I here hear about the ability to capture this oil. I hope it’s true and we’re just praying that’ll be the case. STEPHANOPOULOS: You mentioned this recovery fund that Secretary Salazar talked to historian Doug Brinkley about. What more, specifically, do you think people on the Gulf are waiting to hear from the President tomorrow night? CARVILLE: Well, I mean I think that they definitely want to know what’s the strategy for cleaning this up? How much oil’s been out there? How long do the experts think that this I going to go on? What are going to be the long-term effects on our fishing industry? They’re definitely concerned about this moratorium. This is wrecking the economy down here. What has to be done to get this lifted? How soon can we expect that? And the big thing, of course, is what Doug Brinkley, who is a former resident of New Orleans, is reporting is what is going to happen to our wetlands? We’re losing wetlands at the rate of the size of Manhattan every year. And if this President seizes this initiative and talks about rediverting the river below what they call Myrtle Grove and reflooding those wetlands, that’s going to be a big part of his legacy. That’s going to be an enormous thing and that’s what people are really looking for here. STEPHANOPOULOS: James, you mentioned the moratorium on drilling. And I know a lot of politicians down there in Louisiana and across the Gulf are calling for lifting the moratorium. But do you really think that’s wise given the kind of dangers we’re seeing with very deep water drilling? CARVILLE: Well, certainly we saw this and I think BP last had something like 700 violations and an Exxon operator had one violation. And I think that, certainly, you would have to have stringent regulations. I think every CEO ought to sign off on it. I think we have to have, you know, top flight engineers come in ensuring safety. But I think this stuff can – is necessary. I think it’s essential to the economy down here. And I think properly regulated and properly done, it can be done – nothing can be done risk-free – but I think it can be done much, much better than it was done before. And we’re going to have to get back to this, it’s just a question of when. It’s a very productive field out there and it’s killing the economy of south Louisiana. I mean, you take fishing and you take petroleum away from this, you don’t have a whole lot left. STEPHANOPOULOS: Finally, James, we only have a few seconds left, but bottom line, put on your strategist hat here, has the President contained the political damage? CARVILLE: I think he – I’d rather look forward as we say, and not look back. And you know, I think he can hit this reset button tomorrow night. I think he can not contain the political damage, I think he can eliminate the damage. I actually think done properly, there’s political value in this, I think that he can help himself a great deal. It’s a complex problem. But he’s got to show that he’s on top of this thing. That there’s a strategy in place. That there’s a way to deal with this. And the big thing is, if he’s going to estimate something, estimate it on the conservative side because everything else has been overestimated. STEPHANOPOULOS: Okay, James Carville, thanks very much. CARVILLE: Thank you.

Link:
ABC: Stephanopoulos and Carville Hope Obama Can ‘Hit Reset Button’ on Oil Spill, ‘Contain Political Damage’

Truthdig Interview: Martin Jacques – Part 2 of 5 – Pluses and Minuses of Homogeny

Truthdig Interview: Martin Jacques – Part 2 of 5 – Pluses and Minuses of Homogeny From: truthdig Views: 796 5 ratings Time: 09:56 More in News & Politics

Read more from the original source:
Truthdig Interview: Martin Jacques – Part 2 of 5 – Pluses and Minuses of Homogeny

Happy Birthday, John Edwards!

Former U.S. Senator and Presidential candidate John Edwards turns 57 today. The disgraced politician has given us at least that may absurd stories in recent years. Celebrity sex scandals have become common, and the political realm is no exception. But Edwards’ stands out as the most ridiculous of all time for two reasons: He knocked up Rielle Hunter while running for president . Unlike Tiger Woods or Jesse James, his entire career hinged on the public’s opinion of him. He sabotaged himself beyond the point of redemption, an almost impossible feat. Even Bill Clinton, who was impeached , largely repaired his image. Guess when you cheat on your cancer-stricken wife, impregnate your weird mistress, make a sex tape with her, pay her hush money out of campaign coffers, and lie through your teeth about it all repeatedly to the public, there’s no going back. Happy birthday, John! You disgust us, but thanks for the material!

Originally posted here:
Happy Birthday, John Edwards!

Badass Mortal Kombat Rebirth Short Film Cast

I seems like these days unknown film directors are coming out the world-wide-web and creating video game short films that are arguably better than their big budget motion picture counter parts. Recently unveiled, a Mortal Kombat short is being shopped around to studios to be turned into a full length film. The star studded cast of the short includes; Michael Jai White, Jeri Ryan, and Matt Mullins. http://www.nerdsociety.com/2010/06/08/badass-mortal-kombat-short-film-cast/ added by: NerdSocietyTV

Michael Bay Denied Permission to Destroy Washington, D.C.

It’s a great day to be alive in Washington, D.C. ! The primary-election aftermath has the political atmosphere abuzz, Nationals rookie Stephen Strasburg just made arguably the best pitching debut in Major League history, and the National Park Service dutifully declined Michael Bay’s requests to stage a couple weeks of extravagant Hollywood spectacle in one of the country’s most historic, hallowed locations.

Follow this link:
Michael Bay Denied Permission to Destroy Washington, D.C.

Moving On Up Means More Invasive Species

Open borders, free trade, population growth, and wealth are all serious drivers for the spread of invasive species. Image credit: Kecko /Flickr The open borders of the European Union, it is argued, make the natural shift of populations&mash;from places with few jobs to those with more opportunities—a simpler prospect. Plant and animal species, of course, have never been bound by the political confines of national borders, but new research has shown that increases in human populations and the spread of wealth may be powerful driving forces in the spread of invasive species…. Read the full story on TreeHugger

Read the rest here:
Moving On Up Means More Invasive Species