Tag Archives: politics

South Carolina Mystery Candidate Alvin Greene Was a Terrible Soldier [Exclusive]

It’s been almost a week since mystery man Alvin Greene inexplicably won South Carolina ‘s Democratic senate primary and yet he is still largely a mystery. We spoke to one of Greene’s former Army colleagues for some insight into the guy. More

CNBC Analyst: BP to Lose Offshore Leases, Faces Bar from Government Contracts

With the federal government – both on Capitol Hill and in the White House – beginning to take investigative and punitive action against BP (NYSE: BP ), the future of the company, at least in the United States, is in peril. On CNBC’s June 14 “The Kudlow Report,” John Kilduff, a CNBC contributor and the vice president of MF Global was asked by host Larry Kudlow about a potential debarment from eligibility to be awarded government contracts, which have been very lucrative for the embattled oil giant. “John, this would effectively be debarment,” Kudlow said. “This is something we talked about a week ago, and the prevailing attitude was there would not be debarment because that hardly ever happens in American commercial history. Is President Obama having this as a Sword of Damocles over BP?” And Kilduff explained that this debarment wasn’t necessarily as difficult procedurally to do as some might have thought, which according to him was warranted. “No question about it,” Kilduff replied. “And, you know, we were led to believe that … it was a very sort of torturous procedural issue. Clearly it’s not, and clearly BP’s track record supports amply a debarment action here.” According to Kilduff, debarment from federal contracts would mean the loss of a $2.1-billion annual Pentagon contract. But he also said this potential government action would force the British petroleum giant to divest itself of its American assets at below-fire sale prices. “It’s not just that,” Kilduff said. “Of course it would be very damaging, and plus all the other asset sales, they would have to divest themselves of their Gulf of Mexico assets, their Prudhoe Bay asset, and keep this in mind, this would be more than a fire sale, Larry, because the whole game as changed. As being the lead driller, we’re seeing the extent of the liabilities that the lead driller has. Who’s going to want to step up now and take over a BP-run operation? You don’t know what kind of rat’s nest you’re getting into.” Reports have surfaced that BP has sought the services of Wall Street banking firms to procure a potential takeover defense. According to MarketWatch , ExxonMobil (NYSE: XOM ), Royal Dutch Shell (NYSE: RDS.A ) and Chevron (NYSE: CVX ) are all named as potential buyers. Kudlow asked if these government actions were a foreshadowing of what was to come. “These government punishments and sanctions, and it’s coming from President Obama, it’s coming from Sen. Harry Reid, who’s pushing for this $20 billion escrow fund, now, is this why we are hearing rumors that BP has actually hired Wall Street banking firms for some kind of takeover defense? Is that – can I connect those dots?” Kilduff’s response was that indeed these actions by BP were no more than efforts to “cut corners,” which after facing attacks on all these fronts and having its bottom line battered, makes it vulnerable to such a takeover attempt. “Oh, absolutely, Larry,” Kilduff replied. “And look, what we’re seeing from Congressman Waxman’s hearings tomorrow, the fingerprints are there. What we talked about for all 56 days I feel like on your program, it is a situation of corners cut to save a little bit of money that got us into this mess. They’re caught dead to rights on this. That’s what you’re going to see tomorrow. That’s what’s been released this afternoon. And it’s clear they’re going to be under severe attack from all kinds of quarters – shareholder lawsuits, the federal government, civil, criminal liabilities. All of it.”

Read this article:
CNBC Analyst: BP to Lose Offshore Leases, Faces Bar from Government Contracts

WaPo Predicts Glenn Beck’s Dangerous New Novel May Become Handbook for Terrorists

You don’t have to be a fan of Glenn Beck’s moonlighting as a fiction writer to be a little stunned at the audacity of The Washington Post today. Post book editor Steven Levingston mocks the prose of Beck’s new novel The Overton Window on the front of Tuesday’s Style section, including its patriotic character Molly Ross proclaiming “”There’s nothing I wouldn’t give up to defend my country…No matter how hard it might be, there’s nothing that’s in my power that I wouldn’t do.” But then he suggests Beck will inspire the next Oklahoma City-style terrorist act:   The danger of books like this is that radical readers may take the story’s fiction for fact, or interpret the fiction — which Beck encourages — as a reflection of a reality that they must fend off by any means necessary. “The Overton Window” risks falling into the tradition of other anti-government novels such as “The Turner Diaries” by William L. Pierce, which became a handbook of extremists and inspired Timothy McVeigh to blow up the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City in 1995. As Beck tells his soldiers in the voice of Noah: “Put up or shut up . . . go hard or go home. Freedom is the rare exception . . . not the rule, and if you want it you’ve got to do your part to keep it.” I have not read the book, but I doubt it’s a racist manifesto like “The Turner Diaries.” Levingston’s quotations here don’t exactly suggest his characters are saying “let’s blow up a federal building with an ammonia bomb.” Levingston has a blog on the Post website called Political Bookworm. Last month, he publicized two leftist authors of the book “Over the Cliff: How the Obama Election Drove the American Right Insane.” 

Visit link:
WaPo Predicts Glenn Beck’s Dangerous New Novel May Become Handbook for Terrorists

Twilight Saga Star Robert Pattinson, I’m Going To Die At 30

Twilight Saga Star Robert Pattinson, I’m Going To Die At 30 as he said because he worried God may say he has asked for too much. In a new Nightline interview airing on Monday, The 24-year-old British actor told that so many good things have happened to him at such an early age. According to Robert Pattinson, “I guess I just thought if too many good things happen, then you’re going to die at 30,” “I didn’t want that to happen. Yeah, so probably, I’m going to die at 30. Actually, it’s God saying, ‘Hey, you shouldn’t have asked for too much.” Read More Twilight Saga Star Robert Pattinson, I’m Going To Die At 30 is a post from: Daily World Buzz Continue reading

NY Times Leaves Mao’s Atrocities Out of Obituary for Physicist Turned Maoist Joan Hinton

The New York Times’s obituary Saturday for Manhattan Project physicist turned Maoist Joan Hinton by William Grimes left out her Maoist beliefs in both the headline — ” Joan Hinton, 88, Physicist Who Chose China Over Bomb ” — and a text box: “A Manhattan Project member whose desire for peace led her to a Chinese farm.” And the obituary itself completely omitted the deadly nature of Mao Zedong’s totalitarian regime: Joan Hinton, a physicist who worked on the Manhattan Project, which developed the atom bomb, but spent most of her life as a committed Maoist working on dairy farms in China, died on Tuesday in Beijing. She was 88. …. In 1948, alarmed at the emerging cold war, she gave up physics and left the United States for China, then in the throes of a Communist revolution she wholeheartedly admired. “I did not want to spend my life figuring out how to kill people,” she told National Public Radio in 2002. “I wanted to figure out how to let people have a better life, not a worse life.” Grimes concluded without any reference to Mao’s atrocities during the Cultural Revolution: She and her husband remained true believers in the Maoist cause. “It would have been terrific if Mao had lived,” Ms. Hinton told The Weekend Australian in 2008 during a trip to Japan. “Of course I was 100 percent behind everything that happened in the Cultural Revolution — it was a terrific experience.” By contrast, the Washington Post’s obituary Friday from Matt Schudel mentioned Hinton’s Maoism in the online headline: “Joan Hinton, worked on Manhattan Project and became devoted Mao follower, dies at 88.” A middle paragraph also made clear the murderous nature of the regime: “Nonetheless, Ms. Hinton remained an ardent supporter of Mao, the Chinese Communist leader who controlled the country from 1949 until he died in 1976. Even after Mao’s Cultural Revolution reshaped Chinese society by force, leaving tens of millions of people dead in ideological purges, Ms. Hinton’s loyalty was undiminished .”

Continue reading here:
NY Times Leaves Mao’s Atrocities Out of Obituary for Physicist Turned Maoist Joan Hinton

MSNBC’s Mitchell Downplays Consequences of Cap-and-Trade

After wondering on Friday if President Obama should help push energy legislation through Congress, MSNBC anchor Andrea Mitchell continued her cheerleading for a new energy agenda on Monday. On her afternoon show “Andrea Mitchell Reports,” Mitchell downplayed the cost of last summer’s Cap and Trade bill, and opined that solar energy should be a part of the American energy future. “Ed Markey’s bill–the Markey-Waxman bill–was a year ago, but it is a Cap and Trade bill, as you were pointing out,” Mitchell said to guest Ron Brownstein of Atlantic Media. “It doesn’t really require us to eat our spinach,” she added. Mitchell introduced the segment by referencing the Oval Office address that President Obama will be delivering Tuesday. “How hard will [President Obama]  press BP, and just how far will he go in proposing new energy legislation?” Mitchell asked. After introducing Brownstein to the segment, Mitchell pitched the question she had asked of New York Magazine columnist John Heilemann on Friday: is now the time for sweeping energy legislation? “Strong energy–almost certainly the time to pitch it,” Brownstein answered. He added that it is not certain whether a climate dimension will be included in the bill. The two then discussed Brownstein’s recent trip to China and his insights on the country’s energy policy. “China is by leaps-and-bounds going to lap us on solar,” Mitchell asserted, and then added that it “should be an American initiative.” Brownstein was able to maintain that while China may be making advances in the alternative energy realm, the country is still heavily dependent on coal and thus continues to oppose international efforts to stop global warming. Mitchell chimed in once more on China’s alternative energy record, “It’s extraordinary, and we are falling way, way behind.” The transcript of the segment, which aired on June 14 at 1:16 p.m. EDT, is as follows: ANDREA MITCHELL: When President Obama addresses the nation tomorrow night, how hard will he press BP, and just how far will he go in proposing new energy legislation? Joining us is Ron Brownstein, political director for the Atlantic Media, and someone who has studied energy more intensively than most of our other colleagues, so we welcome you as an expert on that as well. Let’s talk about– is this the time to pitch strong energy legislation and what are the chances of getting anything passed this year? RON BROWNSTEIN, Political Director, Atlantic Media: You know, strong energy–almost certainly the time to pitch it. The hard part is going to be–as you were talking about with Congressman Markey, whether there is a climate dimension to that or not. I think from the beginning–right throughout his campaign, the Stimulus bill–the President has been a strong proponent of incentives to develop alternative energy, wind, solar, efficiency. They’ve always been somewhat ambivalent about whether it was politically realistic to couple that with a serious effort to control carbon emissions, which most advocates argue is the key to a long-term transition toward clean energy. But it imposes more immediate costs now than the carrots you can offer to develop things like solar. So I don’t know what we’ll see tomorrow. I assume that there will be something of a pitch there. But are they in the trenches, really telling Harry Reid, look, this has to be a comprehensive bill? It’s always been a little bit back-and-forth from the administration on that.   ANDREA MITCHELL: And in fact, Ed Markey’s bill–the Markey-Waxman bill, was a year ago, but it is a Cap-and-Trade bill, as you’re pointing out. It doesn’t really require us to eat our spinach , and– RON BROWNSTEIN: Well, it does have longer-term–I mean, the Waxman-Markey bill was a comprehensive bill that had a variety of incentives for alternatives, for efficiency, but also did have a Cap-and-Trade system which limited the emissions of Carbon Dioxide and the other gasses associated with Global Warming. That hits coal the hardest, harder than it does oil. It would have a big impact over time in moving the U.S. away from a reliance on coal to generate as much of its electricity. It’s impact on oil dependence might be smaller over time, but even that–because so many states rely so heavily on coal. It was always uncertain that you get the sixty votes in the Senate for that, and that’s been the delay. There’s been an entire year, as John Kerry and Lindsay Graham and Joe Lieberman and others have tried to find any formula that could get you to sixty votes in the Senate, while limiting carbon emissions. They’ve never found it, and now Harry Reid has to make this decision. Is this the moment to try to do it again, or do you do an energy-only bill, or maybe you can’t do anything. ANDREA MITCHELL: As he’s of course facing his own re-election fight. You just got back from looking at the energy situation in China, and as Bill Gates, Jeff Imhopt, last week– RON BROWNSTEIN: Put out the report– ANDREA MITCHELL: The CEO, of course, of our parent company GE put out their report on R & D, and Ed Markey has a lot of RND in this bill that’s been sitting there for a year. You were in the Gobi Desert, where China– RON BROWNSTEIN: Yes I was. You don’t get to say that everyday. ANDREA MITCHELL: You know, what a great date line– China is by leaps and bounds going to lap us on solar, which should be an American initiative. RON BROWNSTEIN: Right. China is a paradox. Because on one hand, they rely heavily on coal, and they’re a threat to any international effort to constrain Global Warming because of that. On the other hand, they have made enormous, specific goals in the area of alternative energy, solar, wind, high-speed rail, others–and they are becoming a serious competitor for those jobs that the President is counting on as a part of his long-term economic strategy. About half of the solar panels in the world are already built in China and Taiwan. ANDREA MITCHELL: It’s extraordinary, and we are falling way, way behind. Thank you, Ron Brownstein, we are going to stay on this.

Read more from the original source:
MSNBC’s Mitchell Downplays Consequences of Cap-and-Trade

Poll Finds Americans Think Dems Are Too Liberal, Undermining Media Meme

The legacy media love to paint steadfast conservatives as “far right” “ideologues” who are destroying the GOP’s “big tent” and “purging” moderates. The notion that the Republican Party has drifted too far to the right, however, is contradicted by a new Gallup poll showing that Americans are more concerned about Democrats’ fringe elements. About half (49%) of poll respondents told Gallup that they thought the Democratic Party is too far left. Forty-two percent said the GOP is too far right. The former number is the highest it has been since 1994, when Republicans picked up 54 seats in the House and eight in the Senate. Of course most journalists probably don’t share that sentiment–indeed, a number have bemoaned President Obama’s supposed refusal to move even further to the left. Since those journalists are well outside of the nation’s mainstream, center-right political outlook, they will inevitably see Republicans as too far right and Democrats as moderate and centrist. Hence we have Chris Matthews decrying the “frightening, almost Cambodia re-education camp going on in [the Republican] party, where they’re going around to people, sort of switching their minds around saying, if you’re not far right, you’re not right enough.” There is probably not much hope in showing Matthews the light, but this new Gallup poll should dispel theories such as Mark Halperin’s , that Republicans’ steadfast opposition to the president’s agenda is “unlikely to produce a majority against the administration.” In fact, as long as voters see the Democrats’ agenda as too far to the left, such opposition is likely to pay off in November. Ed Morrissey explains : First, it speaks to voter enthusiasm for Democratic candidates.  They won’t get the kind of turnout in 2010 that they did in 2008 when half of all Americans consider them the extreme.  Independents are the biggest problem; in 2008, when Democrats extended their control of Congress and took the White House, independents were narrowly split 43/40 in thinking that the Democratic Party ideological position was “about right.”  Now they have a 19-point deficit among independents, 33/52. They have even lost 10 points among Democrats for “about right” in the last two years, although that got evenly split between “too conservative” and “too liberal.” Second, Obama and Democratic leadership have already hinted that they want to argue in the midterms  that Republicans are the real extremists.  That argument would have worked, according to Gallup’s data, until Democrats started pushing ObamaCare through Congress.  At that point, a plurality of voters thought the GOP was too conservative as opposed to “about right,” 43/34.  That has shifted to 40/41, while Democrats have gone from a “too liberal/about right” split of 46/42 to 49/38 in the same period.  They’re not going to win a debate over extremism, not while rolling up debt like a college freshman with his first Visa card.

Go here to see the original:
Poll Finds Americans Think Dems Are Too Liberal, Undermining Media Meme

Have a Desire for Communist Propaganda? There’s an App for That

Can’t get enough of a brutal dictator responsible for substantial human rights atrocities including millions of deaths, all in the name of a failed ideology? iTunes has just the thing for you. Developer Eigthart, Ltd. presents the iStalin: FREE Communist Posters for the People iPhone/iPad application . The developer’s Web site describes the app as a means to “spread the communist glory.” (h/t @SetonMotley ) “Good news, comrades! Finally, after years of struggle the Industrialization of the Soviet Union paid off. From the creators of the Communist Manifesto, the October Revolution and the Perestroika comes the best Soviet Union product since Kalashnikov – iStalin! Finally the people will have the privilege to create Soviet posters themselves and spread the communist glory!” There is both a free version and a $1.99 version of this application. In addition to various candidate shots of Joseph Stalin, the Statue of Liberty with a “CCCP” label and shot of other left-wing icons, as such as Vladimir Lenin and Che Guevara. “The people can choose between different styles and papers that were approved by the communist party or place a photograph of Stalin or the symbols of the industrial proletariat – the hammer and sickle,” the Web site says. “There are some celebrity appearances including the comrades Lenin and Che. Last but not least, the people will be able to add different soviet slogans that tovarish Stalin personally picked.” Previously, Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL ) has received criticism for what applications that have made it through its approval process, despite claims it has attempted to weed out “inappropriate content.” Other such controversial items have included a “Baby Shaker” app and another app created by PepsiCo (NYSE: PEP ) that offered dating advice to men .

Visit link:
Have a Desire for Communist Propaganda? There’s an App for That

Open Thread: When Congressmen Attack

A couple of college students with camera phones approached Rep. Bob Etheridge, D-N.C., after a fundraiser and asked him if he supports “the Obama agenda.” He did not respond well . Etheridge was obviously out of line, but did he commit a crime ?

View original post here:
Open Thread: When Congressmen Attack

Chris Matthews Tells Charlie Rose That Bill Clinton Is a Hit In ‘Culturally Conservative’ Areas

Have liberals blacked out the sex-and-perjury impeachment of Bill Clinton? MSNBC’s Chris Matthews appeared on the Charlie Rose show on PBS Thursday, and Rose asked him about how Sen. Blanche Lincoln had a “secret weapon” in her primary race in Arkansas. Matthews responded by laying it on thick about how great Bill Clinton is. Surely viewers giggled as Matthews talked about Clinton giving Lincoln “the full Bill.” Boy, that hug, that goes down in history, he had the French cuffs, looked like a million bucks, he put the full Bill around her. It was really an embrace. And you notice it was gender, because when she came out of that hug she was actually just overwhelmed physically, it was like you could see in her face, “I can`t believe the guy likes me that much and wants to help me that much.” It was great. It was very real. Matthews even claimed Clinton was a terrific asset in “culturally conservative Democratic” areas – as if being a “cultural conservative” isn’t at odds with what Bill Clinton represents. But Matthews is still channeling the more-conservative-than-Obama line from 2008, and then he broke down and said Clinton is great anywhere he goes: The big message coming out of this is, if you`re running, if you`re Joe Sestak running for the Senate this fall, you want him in western Pennsylvania, you want him in the culturally conservative Democratic areas. You want him in New Hampshire, another state where Bill Clinton is enormously popular is Pennsylvania and New Hampshire. If you`re running in Ohio, you want him there. You want him in Missouri, Kentucky — all that sort of state — you want him. In fact, you want him almost anywhere. There were some other notable tidbits sprinkled in: Carly Fiorina’s Deal with the Pro-Life Devil? “Fiorina, I don`t think can win a general election because she`s pro-life. She may have taken that position — opposition to Roe versus Wade, opposition to a woman`s right to choose an abortion. But she now has to stand by that politician in the general. I think that might a Faustian deal for her. That may be a real problem. They haven`t elected a pro-life candidate for high office since Deukmejian way back in the 1980s.” Teddy Roosevelt’s the only iconic figure on Mount Rushmore? Asked why a poll found John F. Kennedy should go on Mount Rushmore, Matthews explained: “I think it`s because his life had the arc of a hero, very much like Teddy Roosevelt. Who people think of when they think of Mount Rushmore, Teddy Roosevelt, he`s the one up there that`s really iconic.” Once again, Matthews ignores that many see JFK as the original TV-era cheating-horndog president. Crist will win, and caucus with the Democrats like Joe Lieberman . “I think Charlie is going to beat the band. He`s going to win the general anyway…Yes, he will be the senator, and I think he will organize for the Democrats.” Democrats won’t lose big in the Senate. “So they can win four or five seats as well as lose six or seven, so I think they can get away with only losing two or three seats in the Senate. In the House, I think they face — they`ll lose 40 seats is tough. I think they`re going to be pretty good — Rahm Emanuel will be pretty good – – they will be putting in the sealers. They will be holding off what they can.” Sarah Palin is an effective demagogue. Matthews previewed his “Rise of the Right” documentary by repeating the lines about how the tea-party movement is anti-government: “Sarah Palin is the queen of this group, the leader of this group. She represents the ability — if you listen to her, she`s very attractive and comes off in a traditional way as sort of an attractive woman from the west. “But if you listen to her, her agitation is brilliant. She gets people mad at their government, she gets people mad at them, the Obama crowd. She uses sarcasm, that demagogic language , which is very effective. If you listen to her rallies those people are angrier when she’s done. She’s very good at it and very smart at how to lead that crowd.”

Go here to see the original:
Chris Matthews Tells Charlie Rose That Bill Clinton Is a Hit In ‘Culturally Conservative’ Areas