Tag Archives: pollution

Mercury Levels on the Rise in Lake Erie After Decades of Decline

Mercury pollution might not give fish three eyes, but it does make them dangerous to eat. Image credit: True/Slant Until 1970, mercury was not classified as a dangerous compound in the United States. Before the metal was regulated, it was used extensively in industry—especially in paper making and chemical refining processes. Much of this industry lined the banks of the Great L… Read the full story on TreeHugger

See original here:
Mercury Levels on the Rise in Lake Erie After Decades of Decline

VIDEO Chevron Tries to Restrict 1st Amendment of "Crude" Documentary Filmmaker

The ongoing saga of the class action lawsuit, Aguinda v. Chevron, originally filed in 1993 by the people of Ecuador whose rainforest land had been contaminated by oil production practices, and documented on film by Joe Berlinger in “Crude,” has taken a new turn. Chevron's latest diversionary and delaying tactic is to engage in a widespread and unprecedented legal assault on the First Amendment in their attempt to force Berlinger, the celebrated independent documentarian, to turn over more than 600 hours of private film outtakes from “Crude.” Chevron's legal tactic has attracted widespread criticism from prominent individuals across the media community, including actor and filmmaker Robert Redford, journalist Bill Moyers, bestselling author John Perkins, documentarians Michael Moore and Ric Burns, the Director's Guild of America, the Writer's Guild of America, and others. Virtually every major U.S. media outlet, including the NY Times, LA Times, CBS, NBC, ABC, Associated Press, Dow Jones, HBO, and others have opposed Chevron's action in court. This latest action by Chevron is part of a worldwide, desperate litigation campaign by the oil giant to escape liability for what is thought to be the world's worst oil-related environmental catastrophe. The extent of the contamination is almost unfathomable – by Chevron's own admission they dumped at least 15.8 billion gallons of toxic 'produced water' in the region, and their own audits indicate that the number may actually be much higher – more than 18.5 billion gallons. Of the 18.5 billion gallons of toxins, at least 345 million gallons of it was pure crude oil. To put this in perspective, as of June 15, 2010, U.S. government estimates have indicated that the BP spill in the Gulf has spilled somewhere between 73 and 126 million gallons of oil. At least the BP spill was not intentional. By contrast, Chevron's dumping was, by the company's own admission, a deliberate production decision to maximize profits. According to experts, a saving of approximately $1-3 per barrel of oil was achieved by dumping the toxins rather than disposing of them properly. The end result of this has been incredible devastation of a formerly pristine section of Ecuador's Amazon rainforest. Though Chevron no longer operates in the area (having ceased Ecuadorian drilling operations in 1990), the pollution still remains. The people living in that region do not have widespread running water or plumbing, and have had no access to water that has not been polluted by the oil operations for nearly four decades. I have seen firsthand the reality of the aftermath of Chevron's actions in Ecuador. I have seen some of the unlined, unfenced waste pits that Chevron left behind. I have met many people there who have lost their parents, their children, and who are losing heir own lives. The area is besieged with oil-related illnesses; families are plagued with extremely elevated levels of childhood leukemia, spontaneous abortions, birth defects, and other serious oil-related health impacts. Experts have estimated that at least 1,400 people have died needlessly from oil-related sicknesses due to the illegal dumping. In 1993, the people in the region brought a lawsuit against the oil giant to force the company to clean-up the damage it caused on their land. An independent court-expert has estimated that the damage caused in the region could cost as much as $27.3 billion to clean up. However, even that amount will be insufficient to return the people to the lifestyles they knew before the Chevron showed up. Small wonder Chevron are running scared. Without taking sides in the lawsuit itself, the enormous legal liability tied to all of these harms provides the context for why Chevron is so aggressively attacking its critics across the world. Chevron has one animating principle in their attacks on Joe Berlinger, the Ecuadorean people, and anyone attempting to hold the company responsible for the pollution it left behind in Ecuador: to find some way of eliminating the legal liability to protect the company's bottom line. But the time has come for Chevron to stop its attacks, and to stop trying to evade its responsibilities. The company should cease its futile attempts to force documentarians and journalists to open up their files to the company's lawyers, and instead focus on the essential issue: how they will remediate the damage it caused in Ecuador to the 30,000 affected people and their land. http://www.crudethemovie.com/ added by: captainplanet71

Corporatism 101: [1990] Congress artificially limits Oil companies liability to a meager $75 million dollars.

If you took a barrel of oil and dumped it into a stream on your property you would be fully liable for damage to the property and person of anyone down stream. So when BP’s oil well ruptures, dumping millions of gallons of oil into the gulf the company is fully responsible for the damages it caused and those affected should be fully compensated to be made whole again, right? Unfortunately, the 1990 Oil Pollution Act caps an Oil company’s liability for economic damages relating to an oil spill at $75 million. (As of May 3rd the economic Cost of the BP Oil Spill: was $12.5 Billion, so that only leaves $12,425,000,000 of damages unpaid.) source: http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2010/05/03/oil-spill-cost/ Luckily the Act provides that if the courts determine BP was “grossly negligent or engaged in conduct in violation of federal regulations,” the $75 million cap disappears, so BP is not of the hook yet right? Wrong. Unfortunately, a little known government agency, the Minerals Management Service, “approved BP's application to drill under the Deepwater Horizon and …and approved the blowout preventer that failed to stop the Gulf of Mexico oil spill without assurances that its last-ditch mechanism would work on the drill pipe the company was using.” [1] And the rigs strong track record of passing inspections prompted the regulatory agency to “herald the Deepwater Horizon as an industry model for safety.” [2] The chances of a court finding that BP was “grossly negligent” or in violation of federal regulations, are nil when the very agency that oversees BP not only routinely found the well in compliance with the federal regulations but also hailed it as a model for industry safety. So congress has been caught with its pants down, because the special privilege of a liability cap they created for the oil companies, the judiciary or anyone else can't punish -through punitive damages – or even hold BP liable for more than a fraction of the amount of damage they caused. Which raises an important question: absent a congressional created cap on liability of only $75 million, would BP have drilled an unprecedented 5,000 ft well , without knowledge, technology or experience of capping wells at that depth, if they had unlimited liability and had to pay the actual full amount of the potential damages?($12.5 billion as of May 3.) http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/05/oil_spill_liability_whos_on_th… [1.] http://www.nola.com/news/gulf-oil-spill/index.ssf/2010/05/updates_from_oil_rig_e… [2.] http://www.nola.com/news/gulf-oil-spill/index.ssf/2010/05/federal_inspections_on… added by: Dagum

Air-Purifying Road Surface Eats 45% of NOx Pollution

Photo: Flickr , CC NOx, NOM NOM NOM Researchers at the Eindhoven University of Technology in the Netherlands have tested pollution-eating concrete on about 1,000 square meters of roads in the town of Hengelo. We already knew it worked in the lab, but this was a real-world test and the results are pretty impressive: a 25 to 45% reduction in oxides of nitrogen (NOx) over the special roads. This could mean that someday our roads and other concrete structures could be used to clean up the air. How does it work? Read on for the details…. Read the full story on TreeHugger

Go here to see the original:
Air-Purifying Road Surface Eats 45% of NOx Pollution

Algae-Fighting Armada Trawls the Coast of China

Image credit: ChinaFotoPress/Getty Images Just two weeks ago, a massive, smelly, algae bloom broke out of the coast of China . In just a few days, the bloom blossomed into a cloud covering more than 120 square miles. Now, the same bloom has grown to cover more than 150 square miles. China has dispatched an armada of 66 vessels, ten forklifts, and 168 people to collect the algae before it has a chance to decompose into a potentially toxic slime on the beach…. Read the full story on TreeHugger

View original post here:
Algae-Fighting Armada Trawls the Coast of China

Cleaner Water Helps Corals Combat Climate Change (Duh.)

Photo via Paul and Jill Intuitively, everyone already knows this, but a new study has confirmed that seawater free from pollution helps corals survive the impacts of climate change. Coral reef ecologist Robert van Woesik from the Florida Institute of Technology and his team demonstrated that as the waters around the Florida Keys warmed, the corals living in cleaner water continued to thrive while those in more polluted water suffered. Their findings provide evidence that policies around wastewater discharge and water pollution can help corals surviv… Read the full story on TreeHugger

Original post:
Cleaner Water Helps Corals Combat Climate Change (Duh.)

Journalists Covering BP Spill Now Face Felonies, $40K Fines

There will certainly be no more of this — A journalist diving into the Gulf spill. Photo via AL There’s been much discussion over how BP has been obstructing media coverage of the Gulf spill, and rightly so. Thus far, impediments to coverage have involved the Coast Guard cooperating with BP to turn reporters away, and simply barring journalists’ access from certain impacted areas. But now, reports are surfacing that journalists are no longer just facing the prospect of being turned away — a new rule imposed by the US Coast Guard means that they’re now facing felony charges and fines of tens of… Read the full story on TreeHugger

More here:
Journalists Covering BP Spill Now Face Felonies, $40K Fines

Good Instructions for Preserving the Beach While Enjoying it

Image credit: Good It would make sense that people who love to visit the beach—who enjoy sunbathing, swimming, sand, and surf—would be the most inclined to protect and preserve the coast. Unfortunately, this is not always the case and beaches around the world suffer each year from the very people who make the effort to seek them out. According to Good , it doesn’t have to be this way…. Read the full story on TreeHugger

Read more here:
Good Instructions for Preserving the Beach While Enjoying it

Why We Need Federal Safeguards for Coal Ash

One of the homes destroyed by the December 2008 Tennessee Valley Authority coal ash disaster in Harriman, Tenn. Photo by Lyndsay Moseley. How would you like to live near a pile of toxic waste that, every time the wind blew, spread its particles into your neighborhood? Or this—how would you like to live near a pond full of toxic waste that had no liner and could be seeping into the groundwater and nearby waterways with no penalty? This is happening to thousands of Americans right now—and the toxic waste is coal ash, the by-product of burning coal for energy…. Read the full story on TreeHugger

Read the original:
Why We Need Federal Safeguards for Coal Ash

George Stephanopoulos Lashes Out at Republican Carly Fiorina: Are You Running for the Wrong Job?

Former Democratic operative George Stephanopoulos on Thursday attacked Republican Carly Fiorina for opposing the current unemployment plan in the Senate. The Good Morning America host derided, ” And are you running for the wrong job? How do you create jobs in the Senate, if you don’t pass legislation? ” Stephanopoulos also recycled the California candidate’s June 9 joke about Democratic opponent Barbara Boxer’s hair. Citing the nearly month-old gaffe , he challenged, “I have to ask you about what everybody saw right after the primary, that hair comment, off-mic. Why not apologize for that?” Each Stephanopoulos question either repeated a Boxer talking point or attempted to force Fiorina onto the defensive. The GOP hopeful asserted, “Since the stimulus bill passed, the unemployment rate in California has gotten worse. It was a little over ten percent when the stimulus bill passed in February of ’09. It’s now 12.4 percent.” In a surprised tone, Stephanopoulos retorted, “You think that’s because of the stimulus?” When Fiorina offered an alternative to the Democratic unemployment bill, the ABC host recited, “But 200,000 Californians right now are going to lose their benefits.” Apparently, it didn’t occur to Stephanopoulos to wonder what responsibility the incumbent, Boxer, has for California’s problems. A transcript of the July 1 segment, which aired at 7:08am, follows: GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: Okay, Jon, thanks very much. Let’s get more on this, now, with Carly Fiorina, the former chairman of Hewlett-Packard. Now, the Republican candidate for the U.S. Senate in California. CARLY FIORINA: Great to be with you. STEPHANOPOULOS: And let’s start with immigration. The President is going to give a speech. Certainly going to take on Arizona’s tough, new immigration law. His attorney general calls it unconstitutional. They’re going to file suit. You said, it’s right for Arizona. But you wouldn’t recommend it for California. Isn’t that trying to have it both ways? FIORINA: No. I think, sadly, the people in Arizona have been placed in a terrible position. Border security is the federal government’s job. And it should remain the federal government’s job. Unfortunately, the federal government isn’t doing its job. And we have a situation where portions of the border are virtually lawless, where we have members of drug cartels, Mexican drug cartels well inside the Arizona border, on lookout posts, observing our law enforcement officials. That’s an untenable situation. And what’s going on on the Mexico/Arizona border is truly dangerous. So, I believe the federal government needs to do its job. Secure the border. I also think the federal government needs to do its job and create a temporary worker program that works. It’s very important in California for agriculture, technology. We don’t have a temporary worker program that works. STEPHANOPOULOS: You believe the Arizona law is constitutional? FIORINA: I do. And I’ve read the Arizona law. If you read it, 20 pages, it’s not difficult to read. It’s actually less onerous than federal immigration law. It’s certainly less onerous than the immigration laws in Mexico or virtually any other country. I think, sadly, the people of Arizona felt they had no choice but to protect their citizens. STEPHANOPOULOS: Let’s talk about the number one issue in the country, jobs. FIORINA: Yeah. STEPHANOPOULOS: California has the third-highest unemployment in the nation. Two million people out of work. And more than 200,000 Californians are going to lose their benefits if Congress doesn’t extend the unemployment benefits. That’s stalled in Congress right now. If you were in the Senate, would you vote to extend benefits? FIORINA: Not the way it’s put together today. STEPHANOPOULOS: Why not? FIORINA: Because the problem with this bill has a lot of other things that are appended to it, which add to the deficit, which increases taxes. You know, that’s what Congress always does. I think people are tired of professional politicians because they see a lot of political posturing on both sides. But, they don’t see problems being solved. First, I think, we need to be focused on job creation. And we haven’t been focused on job creation. So, let’s give, small businesses, for example, a two-year payroll tax holiday if they would hire unemployed workers. I would far rather have seen us focus on job creation over the last 18 months. STEPHANOPOULOS: But 200,000 Californians right now are going to lose their benefits. FIORINA: Absolutely. And, so, why can’t we put forward a bill that does nothing but extend unemployment benefits? Why do we put all these other things on top of it? So that we have a deficit-busting, yet another, deficit-busting bill. You know, Californians are worried about two things, whether they’re Democrats, independents or Republicans. They’re worried about jobs. We have 2.3 unemployed people, as you point out. Third-highest unemployment rate in the nation. But they’re also worried about out-of-control spending. Because they don’t understand. They’re cutting back in their families and businesses. But they see Washington, D.C. Getting bigger and bigger and more expensive. STEPHANOPOULOS: But- And you’ve said, passing legislation in the Senate is not the way to create jobs. And are you running for the wrong job? How do you create jobs in the Senate, if you don’t pass legislation? FIORINA: Well, what I actually said was that passing stimulus legislation in the Senate is not the way to create jobs. Since the stimulus bill passed, the unemployment rate in California has gotten worse. It was a little over ten percent when the stimulus bill passed in February of ’09. It’s now 12.4 percent. STEPHANOPOULOS: You think that’s because of the stimulus? FIORINA: I think the stimulus bill has been an utter failure because it’s not focused on job creation. We spent over $800 billion of taxpayer money and the unemployment rate has gotten worse, not better. In fact, what we’re doing in California is destroying jobs because of high government spending, high taxation, thick regulation and too rich entitlements. I’m running because I think California’s a harbinger of what’s to come in this nation if we continue down this path, the destruction of jobs. STEPHANOPOULOS: Your opponent, Senator Boxer, passed legislation in her committee yesterday, to lift the liability cap on British Petroleum. She says that BP has to pay for all of the pollution. Would you vote to lift that cap? FIORINA: Well, I think, in essence, it has been lifted. Bp has agreed to a $20 billion fund. I think the President did exactly right to conclude that agreement with BP. I think it’s probably unfair to ask BP to pay for the workers that have no longer have work, given the President’s ban on offshore drilling, which a federal judge has challenged. STEPHANOPOULOS: So, you wouldn’t vote to lift the cap? FIORINA: I wouldn’t say that. I said BP should pay for all of the cleanup costs, whatever that turns out to be. And clearly, $20 billion is way above the original cap. STEPHANOPOULOS: Finally, we’re just about out of time. I have to ask you about what everybody saw right after the primary, that hair comment, off-mic. Why not apologize for that? FIORINA: You know, I regret the comments, because I gave people the opportunity to talk about something superficial and petty. I’m probably insufficiently sensitive about hair. I started this campaign bald, literally, because I went through chemotherapy and battled cancer last year. But, this is an election about serious issues. And those serious issues include how are we going to create jobs? How are we going to get government spending under control? And how are we going to create a more accountable bureaucracy in Washington? You know, people are tired of a level of incompetence in Washington bureaucracies and lack of accountability, that we would not tolerate anywhere else.

View original post here:
George Stephanopoulos Lashes Out at Republican Carly Fiorina: Are You Running for the Wrong Job?