Tag Archives: president-obama

Your $12 Pack of Cigarettes Will Now Come With These Horrible Pictures [Health]

Under a law signed by President Obama last June, all cigarette packs sold in the U.S. must have anti-smoking messages covering 50% of the front of the package starting next year. Here’s what the FDA is proposing. More

Olbermann Responds to Koppel, Claims Criticized Obama More in a Week that FNC Did Bush in 8 Years

Candice Swanepoel Victoria’s Secret 2010

Read the original here:
Candice Swanepoel Victoria’s Secret 2010

Renata Sozzi Height Bio

Biography for Renata Sozzi Nationality: Brazilian Hair Color: Brown Eye Color: Blue / green Date of Birth: Place of Birth: Height: 5#39;8.5″ ; 174cm Measurements: (US) 32-23-35 ; (EU) 81-59-89 Dress Size: (US) 2-4 ; (EU) 32-34 Shoe Size: (US) 9 ; (EU) 40 ; (UK) 6.5 Advertisements: 2nd Floor, Cris Barros, Mixed, Naguchi, Paula Cahen D#39;Anvers, United Colors of Benetton, Magazine Covers: Brazil: #39;Le Lis Blanc#39; – October 2009; #39;Le Lis Blanc#39; – March 2010; #39;Vogue#39; – April 201

Continued here:
Renata Sozzi Height Bio

LA Times: Liberal Embrace of ‘Waiting for Superman’ Proves Conservatives Are Intolerant

The internet is abuzz with praise for the new documentary that points out the many faults of public education,  Waiting for Superman . With positive reviews from both the  Huffington Post  on the Left as well as the  New York Post   on the Right, it makes one wonder, how could this be? It appears that this film has single-handedly done what  President Obama  could not do to save his own life: bring the Left and Right together on a single issue. It is refreshing that the film’s director, Davis Guggenheim (who directed  An Inconvenient Truth ), is able to put politics aside to see the destructive nature of teachers unions. Guggenheim put his own kids through private school but realizes that not everyone can afford such a luxury. Here, he sets out to tackle the real problems that have long plagued public school systems: teachers unions. Though, he is  careful to say that he isn’t bashing unions  in general. Guggenheim sees that not everything has to be a political football, which is why we should applaud him for taking a bipartisan approach. However, some feel that the response to the film shows the true, negative colors of conservatives. Liberal Patrick Goldstein comments in the  Los Angeles Times : If you’re a documentary filmmaker, you’re happy to get rave reviews from any source, since you need all the good PR you can get. But I find it revealing, when it comes to the liberal vs. conservative partisan divide, that whenever Michael Moore releases a new documentary promoting a liberal cause, conservatives are quick to bash him for being a left-wing propagandist. But when Guggenheim makes a film offering wholehearted support for a conservative cause, liberal critics have written just as many glowing reviews as conservative ones. (The film has a sky-high 93 fresh rating at Rotten Tomatoes.) What does that tell you about who’s got the most open mind here? First of all, only looking at  Michael Moore  and Davis Guggenheim as leftists is a bit single minded (even though they are). Sure, they both have done their partisan films, but one is far worse than the other.  Big Hollywood ‘s editor-in-chief John Nolte has even gone as far as to  defend Moore  when he was appointed to the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences’ Board of Governors: Yes, Michael Moore is a liar, a shameless propagandist and an anti-American leftist of the highest order. But he’s also one helluva talented filmmaker and it would be wildly hypocritical for me to believe or argue that anyone should be blacklisted from AMPAS due to their political beliefs. And that’s the only reason I could possibly use to argue against this appointment. It doesn’t get any fairer than a conservative defending Moore because not doing so would support a blacklist mindset. Even still,  Moore  has dedicated his career to leftist causes.  Look at his films:  Bowling for Columbine  (a good film that ends up ruining itself with a weak plea for gun control),  Fahrenheit 9/11 (a horribly partisan and dishonest portrayal of Bush enabling conspiracy theorists), and  Sicko  (a disgusting defense of socialism). Everything Moore directs (and writes and says) is to further a far Left agenda. Therefore, he is so painfully predictable, which is why it is so easy for the Right to go after him. On the other hand, Guggenheim has directed the paranoid global warming holy film  An Inconvenient Truth  as well as a short for the 2008 Obama campaign. Yet Guggenheim differs from Moore in that he has also done a lot more work outside of political documentaries. If you look at his profile from imdb.com  you will see he has directed episodes of  Deadwood ,  Numbers ,  Alias,  and even the conservative loved  24 , a show Moore wouldn’t touch in fear of losing his leftist cred. Sure,  An Inconvenient Truth  is praised by leftists and hated by conservatives (generally speaking), but by creating a wide variety of content, Guggenheim gives an opportunity for both conservatives and liberals to appreciate his work. So it isn’t fair to assert that liberals are better than conservatives because critics on the Left show balls by embracing a leftist filmmaker who makes a conservative argument (when the Right won’t respect Moore). The day that Moore steps outside of his self-loathing, socialist-loving fog bubble is when conservatives can respect him. Anyone who is honest about their politics will find good and bad on both sides. Guggenheim has apparently done this with  Waiting for Superman . Until Moore decides to transform some of his propaganda films into useful documentaries, we will continue to wait, but I wouldn’t recommend holding your breath. Crossposted at Big Hollywood  

Read more from the original source:
LA Times: Liberal Embrace of ‘Waiting for Superman’ Proves Conservatives Are Intolerant

CBS, ABC Excited Over Barack Obama’s Bid to Recapture His ‘Glory Days’

Both ABC and CBS on Wednesday played up Barack Obama’s attempt to reignite his Democratic base and defeat surging Republicans. Good Morning America host George Stephanopoulos labeled the President’s trip to Madison, Wisconsin a ” glory days tour. ” On CBS’s Early Show, Chip Reid used nearly identical language, claiming the President was “recalling his glory days on the 2008 campaign trail.” The two networks played up the Democratic comeback storyline with little focus on the Republicans. GMA and The Early Show also ignored what it meant for the President to be traveling to an extremely liberal city in order to excite his Democratic base. Reid enthused, “President Obama rallied a raucous crowd of at least 15,000 people at the University of Wisconsin in a speech us that beamed to more than 100 college campuses nationwide. (NBC’s Savannah Guthrie sounded a similar theme on the Today show : “The President proved last night, in Wisconsin, he can still pack tens of thousands of young people into an arena.”) Although CBS did point out that Obama has, thus far, failed to fire up young voters (Jake Tapper made this point on ABC), Reid avoided noting that the President is playing defense in Democratic states. Instead, he closed by highlighting that “there are more campaign-style rallies on college campuses scheduled in the weeks to come.” ABC’s Tapper played up Democratic discontent, featuring the liberal Jane Hamsher of FireDogLake: “[Obama] is telling voters, on the Democratic base, they are irresponsible. They’re, you know, they’re slackers. They don’t care enough to show up.” Pivoting off this, Stephanopoulos later worried to pollster Matt Dowd: “You saw that Vice President Biden came out earlier in the week and said stop whining. You think they [the White House] have to refine the message a little bit?” Stephanopoulos hopefully observed, “The President stepping it up there. He went to church with his family two Sundays ago. Everything you see him doing that, trying to re-establish that emotional connection with the voters.” A transcript of the September 29 Early Show, which aired at 7:06am EDT, follows: HARRY SMITH: Now to President Obama back on the campaign trail, trying to reignite the fire in young voters who helped him win the White House. But getting them to support Democrats this year seems to be a bit of a challenge. CBS News chief White House correspondent Chip Reid is traveling with the President in Des Moines. Good morning, Chip. CHIP REID: Well, good morning. The President is doing whatever he can to fire up the Democratic base before election day. He told Rolling Stone magazine it’s ‘irresponsible and inexcusable’ for Democrats not to go to the polls. And at the University of Wisconsin he gave a barn-burner of a speech. [ON-SCREEN HEADLINE: Obama’s Call to Action; Rallies Youth in Midterm Push] BARACK OBAMA: What did you say, Wisconsin?! CROWD: Yes, we can! REID: Recalling his glory days on the 2008 campaign trail. OBAMA: Hello, Wisconsin! REID: President Obama rallied a raucous crowd of at least 15,000 people at the University of Wisconsin in a speech us that beamed to more than 100 college campuses nationwide. OBAMA: We cannot sit this one out. We can’t let this country fall backwards because the rest of us didn’t care enough to fight. The stakes are too high for our country and for your future. REID: This is the first in a series of campaign rallies aimed at reigniting enthusiasm among young voters who helped propel the President to victory two years ago. But, the problem for Democrats is that many young voters are far less interested in the midterm elections, now just five weeks away. DANEZ SMITH [STUDENT]: The level of enthusiasm, as far as like, this election coming up, I don’t think it’s there at all. BROCK FRITZ [STUDENT]: He’s just trying to get excitement for other people, and not himself. So I guess that kind of changes. REID: Makes it a lot harder. FRITZ: Yeah. RALLY ANNOUNCER: Our United States Senator, Russ Feingold! REID: Other Democrats, like Senator Russ Feingold, who recently avoided appearing with the President at a campaign event, but Tuesday night made a surprise stop. RUSS FEINGOLD: You are my president! You are our president! And I’m thrilled that you are here with all us badgers! REID: The President returned the favor, hoping to give a boost to Feingold, who not long ago was favored to win reelection but is now trailing in the polls. OBAMA: Because, if everybody who fought for change in 2008 shows up to vote in 2010, we will win. We will win. The polls say the same thing, we will win. REID: Today, the President changes the focus back to the economy with another backyard event, but there are more campaign-style rallies on college campuses scheduled in the weeks to come. Back to you. SMITH: Chip Reid in Des Moines, thanks.

Original post:
CBS, ABC Excited Over Barack Obama’s Bid to Recapture His ‘Glory Days’

Krauthammer Smacks Down WaPo’s King Over Stimulus Jobs Created or Saved

For the second week in a row Charles Krauthammer has gotten into a heated debate with the Washington Post’s Colby King on the PBS program “Inside Washington.” This time it was about the effectiveness of President Obama’s stimulus plan.  “These guys have had a year and a half and people are not happy with the results,” said Krauthammer. “$1 trillion of stimulus it disappeared and there is nothing to show.” King responded, “They had 3 million jobs to show for it.” The fun really started after Krauthammer marvelously replied, “Yeah, saved, saved, how do you measure a saved job?” (video follows with transcript and commentary):  GORDON PETERSON, HOST: Is Axelrod right, or is he just looking for an excuse to talk about the President’s bad numbers? EVAN THOMAS, NEWSWEEK: Is that a binary question? CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER: Yeah, the correct answer is “b.” (LAUGHTER) KRAUTHAMMER: Let’s go on to something else. I mean, it’s so damned obvious, come on. I mean, he’s whining in advance, he’s looking for an excuse. He ran, look, these guys have had a year and a half and people are not happy with the results. $1 trillion of stimulus it disappeared and there is nothing to show. With the healthcare reform people don’t want… COLBY KING, WASHINGTON POST: They had 3 million jobs to show for it. KRAUTHAMMER: Yeah, saved, saved, how do you measure a saved job? KING: Go out and ask the teachers. Go out and ask the teachers. Go out and ask the cops whose jobs were saved. Ask them about it. They’ll tell you. KRAUTHAMMER: The net loss of jobs is staggering under this administration. KING: Well… KRAUTHAMMER: Yes… KING: Given the eight years of mismanagement it was bound to happen. KRAUTHAMMER: There has been a half a million increase… KING: The eight years of mismanagement it was bound to happen. KRAUTHAMMER: …government jobs have gone up and the private sector has cratered. KING: Charles, that’s speaking a lie, you know exactly what I am talking about because you are a straight shooter. PETERSON: If you’re Axelrod, Evan, what do you say to the President at this point? KRAUTHAMMER: I’m leaving. [Laughter] KRAUTHAMMER: Which he is. I’m leaving in spring. That’s what you say. THOMAS: Yeah, I think that they are really exhausted and, and a little bit down and they’re just kind of, I think they’re, they don’t know what to do. I don’t, I don’t think they are having happy, optimistic, this is all going to work out conversations in the Oval Office. I think they’re just trying to get… NINA TOTENBERG, NPR: Do you have any good ideas? KRAUTHAMMER: They made a choice early on that they were going to push an ideological agenda on healthcare instead of addressing the American economy and that is the major complaint against them. And that’s why they’re going to get swept in November. Indeed. Nicely done, Charles. These weekly smackdowns are becoming something to look forward to on Friday nights. Almost better than high school football.  Readers are encouraged to review last week’s fight .  

Excerpt from:
Krauthammer Smacks Down WaPo’s King Over Stimulus Jobs Created or Saved

Police Stop Man From Selling Fruit on a Corner

I wish I would've gotten out and taken pictures. This man was a fixture in my city. he would stand at a 4 way intersection and sell watermelons, strawberries, and other fruits and vegetables. I thought to myself “Wow this guy has some motivation to stand there all day in the sun with hundreds of cars passing him each day” I applauded his entrepreneurial spirit. And this cuts down to the reason Im a conservative. This guy should be allowed to sell that fruit on the corner. http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn :yERqwGj88bY6zM:http://www.acc-tv.com/images/wset/news/police_crime_siren.jpg&t=1 added by: ibrake4rappers13

Ahmadinejad: US behind September 11 attacks

Iranian president delivers snappish speech at UN, says American administration planned Sept. 11 attacks to salvage US economy, Israel; Ahmadinejad slams 'Zionist crimes,' presents audience with anti-Western 'history lesson' Representatives of the US and other Western countries walked out during the speech to express their protest over the Iranian leader's “failure to uphold the official 9/11 Commission's version of September 11, 2001 added by: maasanova

Dear Senior Citizens, Turn off Fox and Pay Attention !

One of the biggest voting blocks in the country are our senior citizens the very people that will get screwed if the Republican Tea Party is allowed to take back congress this fall. Every voting cycle the voting block tat comes out to vote are our seniors, whether it's mid-term or presidential general. added by: kennymotown