Tag Archives: protestors

Amateur Hour at CNN: Error-Filled Chyron During Beck Rally

There is something about CNN and the people writing chyrons for the alleged “most trusted name in news” with the “best political team on television.” Last week, these geniuses clarified the White House’s position on President Barack Obama’s religion. However on CNN Aug. 28 coverage of Glenn Beck’s “Restoring Honor” rally, which CNN reporters and anchors seemingly held their collective noses up and reported on throughout the event, the chyron on the screen was something likened to one of those parlor games where you circle the numerous errors involved. (h/t Inside Cable News ) First off, former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin’s name was misspelled. Second, she was identified as a former presidential candidate, when she was actually the Republican vice-presidential nominee in 2008. And finally, it’s labeling Beck as Palin. Just not a good day for CNN.

Original post:
Amateur Hour at CNN: Error-Filled Chyron During Beck Rally

Reporter Who Smeared Tea Party With False Accusations of Violence Has ‘No Regrets’

A reporter for the St. Louis paper the Riverfront Times has a message for all the members of the Tea Party movement he smeared with false accusations of political violence: “I have no regrets.” Chad Garrison penned a blog post last week speculating that a member of the Tea Party had firebombed the office of Rep. Russ Carnahan, D-Mo. “Given what we know of [the perpatrator] – 50, white, angry – he certainly fits the demographics of a Tea Party member,” Garrison wrote. ” “On second thought,” he added, “maybe he’s not a Tea Party member. Firebombing your opponent’s office seems a little too, um, sane for that group.” But it turns out the man was actually a disgruntled former Carnahan staffer and blogger for the left-wing site Talking Points Memo, not a member of the Tea Party. Members of the movement asked Garrison to retract. His response: you people have no sense of humor. “As to the legions of Tea Party adherents who are calling for my head: No, I have no regrets,” he said in an email. “I was having fun – at their expense.” In case you’re wondering (I was), the Riverfront Times does not bill itself as a sort of localized version of the Onion – it’s not a satirical publication. There also was no notice on Garrison’s piece that what followed was just a joke. So this apparently is the journalistic standard RFT imposes on its employees. They can smear entire political movements by speculating – without evidence and, it turns out, contrary to the facts – that its members are violent. When they’re called out for their sloppy and borderline-unethical reporting, they can just claim they were joking. How professional. As usual, Ace does a fantastic job of illustrating the utter absurdity of the whole debacle. I’ll let him close it out: Again.. I’m sure this is sick-funny but I’m a little too stupid, I’m afraid, to understand the humor here. It’s like that intellectual humor, you know, like on Frasier. Oh That Reminds Me… I heard a joke once. It was pretty funny. Stop me if you’ve heard this one before: Knock knock. — Who’s there? Boo. — Boo who? Boo who we’re going to take the country back and leave you with nothing but your hot hysterical tears as you sob to yourself that your New God is dead and make hesitation-cuts on your wrists with a straighrazor. Pretty good one too, right? I like the “boo hoo” part. And also, the part where you die broken and alone.

Go here to read the rest:
Reporter Who Smeared Tea Party With False Accusations of Violence Has ‘No Regrets’

In Light of NAACP Condemnation, Media Brings Back Tea Party Fraud

Memo to media members wishing to invite the Tea Party Founder on your show, or use him as a source for your biased reports:  He isn’t exactly who you think he is. Since the NAACP voted to condemn extremist elements in the Tea Party, news networks, sites, and liberal blogs have rushed to include ‘Tea Party Founder’, Dale Robertson, in their reports.  Problem being, Dale Robertson as Tea Party anything has frequently and thoroughly been, um … ‘refudiated’.    Despite this, the media has a history of holding Robertson up as a shining example of Tea Party racism.  Why?  Robertson once demonstrated a level of ignorance that boggles the mind by holding a sign reading “Congress = Slaveowner, Taxpayer = (N-Word)”, at a Houston Tea Party Society (TPS) event. The reality however, is that Robertson has predominantly self-described, if any, links to the Tea Party movement, while legitimate factions of the movement have had to repeatedly distance themselves from the man.  Robertson was expelled from the event at which he was holding the aforementioned sign on the very same day.  He was formally denounced in a statement released by the Houston TPS.  He was called ‘no friend’ of the Tea Party at Pajamas Media, and mocked at RedState.  He was shown to be for his infamous sign , before he was against it. So logically, the media has decided to help further the cause of the NAACP by bringing Robertson back out of the shadows.  Since word of the the NAACP resolution got out, Robertson’s name has appeared at… The Huffington Post CBS’ Face the Nation ABC News Beyond Chron , San Francisco’s alternative newspaper The Kansas City Star The Daily Kos A blog called The Stir , which also offers a handy list of ‘phrases to drop’ to counter the Tea Party defense. An Op-Ed at the Daily Caller And Mediaite It should be noted that Mediate refers to the fact that the Houston TPS still has the offending image of Robertson on their web site, in an apparent attempt to demonstrate their tolerance for his bigotry.  But it fails to include the context that yes, while the image is on their site, it is there as a reference to explain just who this guy is, and why they have had to deal with him.  They actually link to the image with the following statement: “Yes, at our very first tea party event in February of 2009, this piece of work strolled in with his awful sign, attracting the lone media camera and sentencing us to an eternity of disassociation.  We dealt with him on that day, expelling him from the event.” Then of course, there’s the NAACP themselves.  They have Robertson’s photo featured on their page announcing the condemnation of extremist elements in the Tea Party.  They were also kind enough to include photos which show the kind of fringe group that could only be protesting a President because he’s black, and because they’re racist.  For instance, a racist picture of the President being portrayed as Hitler.  No not this one …

Zombie Girls In Cannes

The great Cannes festival is well known. Why? Because thats the place where you can see some of the best actors in the whole world – every year! But thats not all. This year people saw something “different”… Someone would say that’s cool, others would say that they are disgusting , but we will say that these girls are definitely bizarre. http://buzzinn.net/zombie-girls-in-cannes/ added by: remanns

A City on Fire – Toronto G20 Riots

Shortly after arriving in the downtown core of Toronto, we met up with the tail end of protestors. We saw Black Bloc terrorists moving away from King and Bay. We started to follow the protestors and noticed what we thought was tear gas being shot in to the crowd. We got closed, and realized it was actually a Police car, TAVIS unit 56 which had been smashed in, spray painted and then set ablaze. I stayed in the area taking photos, and soon realized Police had us surrounded on all 4 sides. They would not let us leave the fire zone, and kept the 20 – 30 of us in front of the first fire, and right in front of the second fire of Unit #730, which caught fire after police passed by. http://www.flickr.com/photos/scolirk/4737075110/in/photostream/ added by: Scolirk

Scarborough Calls on Petraeus and Gates to Fire McChrystal to ‘Keep the President’s Hands Clean’

During Tuesday’s Morning Joe, host Joe Scarborough called for the firing of General Stanley McChrystal. He boldly exclaimed that this discharge should not come from the Commander-in-Chief because “Democrats have to treat generals differently from Republicans.” He goes even further and states, “Were this a Republican, were it George W. Bush, McChrystal would have been fired yesterday,” and “the press would have understood it.” Of course, because during the last administration, the media was noted for giving former President George W. Bush the benefit of the doubt, especially with military decisions. Interestingly enough, a flashback to January 31, 2006, tells a different tale. During MSNBC’s three-hour post State of the Union coverage, Chris Matthews and Joe Scarborough, denounced President Bush’s message about Iraq. Matthews thought that President Bush “cashiered” General Shinseki’s remarks about wanting more troops and believed the “idea that these guys are free to think out loud, I thought, has been yet to be proven.” Scarborough echoed Matthews and cited that, “For the most part, the Generals and the Admirals, 99 percent of them parrot what the Pentagon and what the President wants.” [Full article available here ] However, it is now 2010, and it is no longer cool to have the courage to stand up or to think out loud against this administration. There is a new president, so Scarborough insisted, because he is a Democrat, “Gates and Petraeus both have to come out, they need to fire McChrystal, and keep the president’s hands clean.” Since, Scarborough served on the Armed Services Committee he should be aware that the President is the top link in the chain of command and therefore is the ultimate authority, but he wants to make it easier for this Democrat to not do his duty as Commander-in-Chief. Apparently, Scarborough’s conservative viewpoint is synonymous with other MSNBC hosts who parrots White House talking points.

Newsweek Blogger: Tea Party Coverage Isn’t Harsh Enough

Newsweek blogger Ben Adler thinks the national media are giving the Tea Parties gentle treatment. “Unfortunately,” Adler wrote in a June 21 post , “what appear to be false notions of objectivity – or perhaps a lack of interest in policy – is preventing that coverage from illuminating what the movement actually represents and what it would do if empowered.” Adler complained that a recent Associated Press article, ” Enraged to Engaged: Tea partiers explain why ,” failed to examine the ideology of the demonstrators in the grassroots conservative movement. “The piece examines how and why a variety of individuals became involved in the Tea Party movement without once asking what precisely the platform consists of,” Adler said, leading one to wonder if he even read the article. The 2,300-word “stemwinder,” as Adler called it, written by reporter Pauline Arrillaga, presented various segments of Tea Party ideology on five separate occasions. In the third paragraph, Arrillaga notes that the purpose of the Tea Party-affiliated Lincoln Club in Yucca Valley, Calif., is “to promote educate and advance conservative principles of fiscal responsibility small limited government, free enterprise, the rule of law, private property rights, and the preservation and protection of individual liberty.” Eric Odom, widely regarded as a founder of the Tea Party movement, told Arrillaga said the group’s purpose was, “to make sure that we’re represented by people who are looking out for our rights and upholding the Constitution… And if they don’t, to make sure we have an infrastructure to really take them out rather than have these thugs that are in there for 30, 40 years.” As Adler put it, Tea Partiers are “vehemently opposed” to raising taxes. “But when it comes to specifics, suddenly every program seems worthier than when demonized in the collective abstract. Which politician wants to cut spending on Homeland Security? Education for students with special needs? (Surely not Sarah Palin!),” Adler said in a reference to Palin’s son, Trig, who was born with Down syndrome. Adler complained that the AP would dare characterized Tea Party demonstrators as “concerned Americans trying to find their voices, and a way to channel their disgust.” He suggested they aren’t motivated by love of country or concern for the future, but by ignorance. Arrillaga’s article refuted the notion that Tea Party activists are “ignorant,” however. Bill Warner, Lincoln Club member, ran his own engineering firm for three decades. Hildy Angius is currently running the Republican Woman’s Club, and is a staunch Tea Party Activist. She is an ex-PR agent with a degree from New York State Albany. Eric Odom started the Tea Party movement fresh out of college. Tea Partiers come from all walks of life and have diverse academic backgrounds. Adler also predictable recycled a tired media-drive stereotype that Tea Party members are racist. He suggested they are too dumb to realize they’re racist. “Might it be possible that the Tea Partiers who profess no racial motivation are, let’s say, not entirely aware of their own visceral motivations? I’m sure if you asked the Southern voters who switched to Republican voting habits why they did so, many would say race had nothing to do with it. But why should journalists take that at face value?” Adler said. Adler’s assertion that the media have been soft on the Tea Parties might come as a surprise to anyone who’s paid attention to media coverage of Tea Parties. From the very first demonstrations in April 2009, reporters have attacked Tea Party members . According to a Media Research Center study , the media at first tried to ignore the demonstrations, but quickly moved into attack mode, portraying Tea Party protestors as extremists. Just last week, MSNBC’s Chris Matthews aired a “documentary” about the Tea Party portraying its members as racists, terrorists and conspiracy theorists. 

View post:
Newsweek Blogger: Tea Party Coverage Isn’t Harsh Enough

BREAKING NEWS: Protesting World Cup 2010 Stadium Security In Durban Clash With Riot Police

Police appeared set off two percussive grenades to force the protestors to exit the parking lot of the stadium. There has been no word if any protestors were injured or arrested during the demonstration in the early hours of Monday morning.

See more here:
BREAKING NEWS: Protesting World Cup 2010 Stadium Security In Durban Clash With Riot Police

CNN’s Sanchez Highlights ‘Big Oil’ Cash to Republicans, Omits Obama

On Wednesday’s Rick’s List, CNN’s Rick Sanchez twice highlighted how “several Republicans want to keep the cap on what oil companies pay for spills at $75 million” and how apparently that’s about “how much they [oil companies] spend on campaign contributions to politicians each year,” but omitted that President Obama was the top recipient of money from BP during the 2008 election cycle. Sanchez first made those statements during a segment just after the beginning of the 3 pm Eastern hour, as he reported on left-wing organization Code Pink’s interruption of a hearing of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee earlier on Wednesday. Before playing a clip of the protest, the CNN anchor stated how Diane Wilson “disrupted a Senate hearing this morning by pouring oil all over herself.” He continued that Wilson “was arrested, but not before she interrupted Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski, who is tied, many would argue, to big oil in Alaska.” Sanchez didn’t mention that the protester is one of the co-founders of Code Pink . However, CNN.com’s article on the protest did acknowledge that Code Pink released a statement from Wilson on her publicity stunt. After playing the clip of the protest, the anchor tried to further tie Murkowski and other Republican senators to the oil industry: “Murkowski, by the way, is one of several Republicans who want to keep the cap on what oil companies pay for spills at $75 million. Imagine that for a moment- they would only pay $75 million, if they chose to, after all the damage that’s been done in the Gulf of Mexico, which is, ironically enough, about how much they spend on campaign contributions to politicians each year.” Speaking of campaign contributions to politicians, a May 5 article on CNN.com recognized that “the top recipient of BP-related donations during the 2008 presidential election was Barack Obama, who collected $71,000, according to the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics.” Despite all his attention on Republicans, Sanchez didn’t give this key detail. The same Center for Responsive Politics noted on its OpenSecrets.org website that “individuals and political action committees affiliated with oil and gas companies have donated $238.7 million to candidates and parties since the 1990 election cycle.” That’s just under $12 million per year over 20 years, so one wonders where the CNN anchor got his figure from. Sanchez didn’t use his “tied to big oil” line during his recap of the report just after the top of the 4 pm Eastern hour, but repeated his statement about Murkowski and the “several Republicans.” He again failed to mention Wilson’s membership in Code Pink. SANCHEZ: First of all, I want to show you something that might illustrate the frustration with the oily mess in Gulf of Mexico the best. this is Diane Wilson, a distraught shrimper. She wrote a book about the environmental impact in the Gulf. She disrupted a Senate hearing this morning by pouring oil all over herself right there in front of all these folks. She was arrested, but not before interrupting Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska. Here it is. SENATOR LISA MURKOWSKI: It’s been a couple weeks now since you have been before the committee. I think last time you were here, the oil from the (unintelligible)- DIANE WILSON (off-camera): We’re tired of the bailouts and we’re tired of being dumped on in the Gulf. I’m a commercial fisherman from the Gulf of Mexico, and we’re tired of being dumped on. SENATOR JEFF BINGAMAN (off-camera): Let me announce to the protesters to please exit the room and allow us to proceed with our hearing. MURKOWSKI: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. SANCHEZ: ‘We are tired of being dumped on.’ Murkowski, by the way, is one of several Republicans who want to keep the cap on what oil companies pay for spills at $75 million. Imagine that for a moment- they would only pay $75 million, if they chose to, after all the damage that’s been done in the Gulf of Mexico, which is, ironically enough, about how much they spend on campaign contributions to politicians each year.

Link:
CNN’s Sanchez Highlights ‘Big Oil’ Cash to Republicans, Omits Obama