Tag Archives: rating

Are Both Parties Equally Vulnerable in November, Like the New York Times Says? Hardly

New York Times reporters Jeff Zeleny and Megan Thee-Brenan examined the findings of the latest CBS/New York Times poll. As November elections approach, things look pretty bleak for Democrats and President Obama especially, who earned a record low approval rating and bad marks on his handling of the economy. But Zeleny whispered a little between-round encouragement into the ear of the battered Democrats, suggesting both sides were equally vulnerable in Thursday’s front page ” Poll Finds Hazards and Opportunities for Both Parties .” The original online headline, “Poll Suggests Big Opening for G.O.P. Going Into Midterms,” was far more accurate. Republicans are heading into the general election phase of the midterm campaign backed by two powerful currents: the highest proportion of voters in two decades say it is time for their own member of Congress to be replaced, and Americans are expressing widespread dissatisfaction with President Obama’s leadership. But the latest New York Times/CBS News poll also finds that while voters rate the performance of Democrats negatively, they view Republicans as even worse, providing a potential opening for Democrats to make a last-ditch case for keeping their hold on power. The poll represents a snapshot of the country’s political mood as the campaign pivots from primary contests that have revealed deep divisions among Republicans into the general election, where the parties deliver their competing arguments to a wider audience. The findings suggest that there are opportunities and vulnerabilities for both parties as they proceed into the final seven weeks of the campaign. But the Times (albeit burying the news at the end of the last sentence of paragraph seven) apparently thinks at least one house of Congress may fall into Republican hands. Voters have a darker view of Congressional Republicans than of Democrats, with 63 percent disapproving of Democrats and 73 percent disapproving of Republicans. But with less than two months remaining until Election Day, there are few signs that Democrats have made gains persuading Americans that they should keep control of Congress. Not until paragraph 18 did the Times mention Obama’s record low approval rating, of 45 approval-disapproval. The paper didn’t mention it’s Obama’s lowest-ever approval rating in a New York Times poll (the last joint Times/CBS poll, in June, had Obama 47 approval-disapproval). The president’s overall job approval rating is 45 percent, with 47 percent disapproving. On the economy, his rating is worse, with 41 percent approving and 51 percent disapproving. When asked whether Mr. Obama has a clear plan for solving the nation’s problems, 57 percent responded that he did not, yet twice as many give him more credit than Republicans for having a plan. The Times pushed for higher taxes in a short sidebar article by Megan Thee-Brenan, ” Support for Higher Tax on Wealthiest .” Amid heated debate in Washington over the fate of the Bush-era tax cuts, there is strong support for the Obama administration’s proposal to allow the tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans to expire at the end of the year. However, the latest New York Times/CBS News poll finds the public does not expect that to happen if the Republicans win control of Congress in November. The poll found that 53 percent of Americans say Mr. Obama’s proposal to increase taxes on households earning $250,000 or more is a good idea, and 38 percent say it is a bad idea. But she didn’t mention that that’s less support then the last time the Times polled that question. Back in February, 62% thought it was a good idea, 31% a bad idea. That spread has since narrowed to 53. That was Question 63; you can read a .PDF version of the Times’ latest poll here .

The rest is here:
Are Both Parties Equally Vulnerable in November, Like the New York Times Says? Hardly

Bamboo Pavilion: Low-Cost Communal Living

Images: Esan Rahmani and Mukul Damle Forget yesterday’s commune — ‘communal living’ nowadays can refer to any number of situations — from pricier market housing to low-income developments , or to temporary applications like refugee shelters . Falling somewhere in between is this Bamboo Pavilion — a… Read the full story on TreeHugger

Original post:
Bamboo Pavilion: Low-Cost Communal Living

The Lexus CT 200h Hybrid Disappoints on MPG (Wake Up Toyota!)

Photo: Lexus Combined EPA Rating of 42 MPG A few months ago we started getting some info on the new Lexus CT 200h hybrid . At the time, there was some hope that this premium compact would set a new fuel economy benchmark, and if not, at least match the Prius. After all, this being a Lexus, cost is less of an issue. Better and/or bigger batteries could have been used to boost overall MPG, more aluminum could have been used to reduce weight, etc. But it seems like Toyota thinks i… Read the full story on TreeHugger

Read more:
The Lexus CT 200h Hybrid Disappoints on MPG (Wake Up Toyota!)

Obama Gets Highest Ratings from Followers of Olbermann, Maddow and NYT

A new study by the Pew Research Center found that Barack Obama gets his highest approval ratings from people that watch MSNBC’s Keith Olbermann and Rachel Maddow, as well as from readers of the New York Times. The numbers are rather staggering, as 84 percent of regular viewers of MSNBC’s “Countdown” give the President high marks for his job performance. This compares to 80 percent for regular viewers of “The Rachel Maddow Show” and 79 percent for regular readers of the Times. But that’s just one of the interesting findings in the Pew survey released Sunday: Americans are spending more time with the news than was the case a decade ago. As was the case in 2000, people now say they spend 57 minutes on average getting the news from TV, radio or newspapers on a given day. But today, they also spend an additional 13 minutes getting news online, increasing the total time spent with the news to 70 minutes. This is one of the highest totals on this measure since the mid-1990s and it does not take into account time spent getting news on cell phones or other digital devices . Only about one-in-four (26%) Americans say they read a newspaper in print yesterday, down from 30% two years ago and 38% in 2006. Meanwhile, online newspaper readership continues to grow and is offsetting some of the overall decline in readership. This year, 17% of Americans say they read something on a newspaper’s website yesterday, up from 13% in 2008 and 9% in 2006. Overall, cable news continues to play a significant role in peoples’ news habits – 39% say they regularly get news from a cable channel. But the proportions saying they regularly watch CNN, MSNBC and CNBC have slipped substantially from two years ago, during the presidential election. The partisan divide in cable news is stunning if not shocking: Only Fox News has maintained its audience size, and this is because of the increasing number of Republicans who regularly get news there. Four-in-ten Republicans (40%) now say they regularly watch Fox News, up from 36% two years ago and just 18% a decade ago. Just 12% of Republicans regularly watch CNN, and just 6% regularly watch MSNBC. As recently as 2002, Republicans were as likely to watch CNN (28%) as Fox News (25%). The share of Democrats who regularly watch CNN or Fox News has fallen from 2008. Interesting. So both Democrats and Republicans are reducing their viewership of CNN. Doesn’t say much for the supposedly must trusted name in news, does it? Eight-in-ten Americans (80%) who regularly listen to Rush Limbaugh or watch Sean Hannity are conservative – roughly twice the national average of 36%. And at the other end of the spectrum, the New York Times, Keith Olbermann, the Daily Show, the Colbert Report and Rachel Maddow have regular audiences that include nearly twice the proportion of liberals than in the public. News audiences also vary widely when it comes to opinions about current issues and topics. For instance, those who describe themselves as supporters of the Tea Party movement make up disproportionately large proportions of the audiences for Limbaugh’s radio show and Fox News opinion programs. This also is the case for supporters of the NRA (National Rifle Association). By contrast, supporters of gay rights make up large shares of regular New York Times readers, viewers of the Colbert Report and NPR listeners. Several ideologically divergent news audiences – including Wall Street Journal readers and viewers of the Colbert Report and Glenn Beck show – include larger-than-average percentages of self-described libertarians. Here’s where things really got interesting: Overall, the share of Americans who say keeping up with the news is something they enjoy a lot has dipped, from a consistent 52% in recent biennial news consumption surveys, including 2008, to 45% in 2010. The decline is linked to partisanship and ideology: in 2008 67% of liberal Democrats said they enjoyed the news a lot, compared with just 45% today. By contrast, about as many conservative Republicans say they enjoy keeping up with the news today as did so two years ago (57% now, 56% then). This has resulted in a switch in news enjoyment. Today, conservative Republicans enjoy keeping up with the news more than any other ideological and partisan group; just two years ago it was the liberal Democrats who held that distinction. How much of this is economic? After all, the news was far better when Pew last did this study in 2008. There certainly is less to “enjoy” today. On the other hand, that doesn’t explain the ideological divide. Maybe liberals liked things better when Bush and the Republicans were being blamed for all the problems in the world, and just can’t stand watching their politicians take any heat at all. By contrast, it seems conservatives enjoy keeping up with the news regardless of which Party is getting scrutinized. That says something, doesn’t it? Search engines are playing a substantially larger role in people’s news gathering habits – 33% regularly use search engines to get news on topics of interest, up from 19% in 2008. This is a predictable but yet concerning finding, for it makes it essential that search engines don’t have their own biases. As conservatives have pointed fingers at Google’s algorithms for years, the more people rely on search engines to guide them to news sources, the more impartial such engines better be, especially for the following reason: About eight-in-ten (82%) say they see at least some bias in news coverage; by a 43% to 23% margin, more say it is a liberal than a conservative bias. This makes search engine neutrality essential or conservatives are really going to have a hard time leveling the playing field. That said, we’ve saved the best for last: Among news audiences, Obama gets his highest approval ratings among regular viewers of Keith Olbermann (84% approve) and Rachel Maddow (80%); his rating is nearly as high among regular readers of the New York Times (79%). Obama gets his lowest ratings among regular Sean Hannity viewers (7%) and Rush Limbaugh listeners (9%). So Obama gets his highest approval ratings from folks that watch Olbermann, Maddow, and read the New York Times. What does this say about the journalistic standards at MSNBC and the Gray Lady? After all, depending on which poll you look at, half or less of the nation currently approve of the job Obama is doing.  If Olbermann and Maddow watchers, along with Times readers, have such a drastically different view of the President than the rest of the nation, these entities must be doing a horrible job of reporting the news to their patrons.  Is there any greater example of the dangers of liberal media bias and the need to aggressively combat it? 

Read this article:
Obama Gets Highest Ratings from Followers of Olbermann, Maddow and NYT

How Do you Rate Your Local Farmers’ Market? – New Rating System Just Launched!

New Rating System Lets you rate farmers' markets you visit and then ranks them daily. http://www.top10fresh.com/reviews/farmers/Minnesota/sbr/date_desc/3440/mill-city… This is the link to the Top Ranked Farmers' Market in Minnesota added by: TOP10PRODUCELLC

‘Avatar’ Director James Cameron Talks ‘Alien Kink Scene’

‘I would call it more of an alien foreplay scene,’ he tells MTV News. By Kara Warner, with reporting by Josh Horowitz Zoe Saldana and Sam Worthington in “Avatar” Photo: 20th Century Fox With the re-release of the biggest film in movie history quickly approaching (“Avatar” hits theaters again in 3-D and 3-D IMAX on August 27), fans and critics alike are speculating what impact director James Cameron’s nine extra minutes of footage will have on the overall story. When MTV News caught up with Cameron last week, we asked him whether the extra footage might contain the infamous Na’vi sex scene between Neytiri and Jake. “You mean the alien kink scene?” he joked. “It’s been restored, every last frame of it. Seriously,” he said, adding that the scene in question won’t break any records — it lasts all of about 20 seconds. “I would say, just so that we correctly manage people’s expectations,” he explained carefully, “it does not change our rating at all. I would call it more of an alien foreplay scene. It’s not like they’re ripping their clothes off and going at it.” Whether 20 seconds or 100, the buzz around the scene in question has been intense, and the media coverage even more extensive. The film’s star, Sam Worthington, told MTV News last month that the famed scene is “unique,” and, judging by the descriptions from Cameron’s actual script , which was briefly posted online, unique is certainly the appropriate term. “The tendrils intertwine with gentle undulations,” one line reads. The shared experience is described as “the ultimate intimacy.” “They come together into a kiss and sink down on the bed of moss, and ripples of light spread out around them.” Do you want to see the Na’vi love scene? Let us know in the comments! Check out everything we’ve got on “Avatar.” For breaking news, celebrity columns, humor and more — updated around the clock — visit MTVMoviesBlog.com . Related Photos “Avatar” World Premiere “Avatar”

More:
‘Avatar’ Director James Cameron Talks ‘Alien Kink Scene’

Jason Derulo Calls Two VMA Nominations ‘Really Cool’

‘I already feel like a winner,’ the ‘In My Head’ singer tells MTV News. By Jocelyn Vena Jason Derulo Photo: Jamie McCarthy/ Getty Images Jason Der

‘Breaking Dawn, Part 2’ To Be Released November 2012

‘Twilight Saga’ finale avoids glut of summer blockbusters with fall release. By Kara Warner “Twilight” stars Robert Pattinson, Kristen Stewart and Taylor Lautner Photo: John Gress/ Getty Images For better or worse, the end is in sight, Twilighters. Summit Entertainment has announced the official release date for “The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn, Part 2.” The final film adaptation of Stephenie Meyer’s best-selling series is scheduled to open in theaters on November 16, 2012. When Summit revealed that “Breaking Dawn” would be split into two films — with the first film’s release date set for November 18, 2011 #&8212; there was much speculation that the final chapter would drop the following summer. This news puts the second film out almost a full year after Part 1, no doubt creating an excruciating waiting period for the film franchise’s extremely dedicated fans. With no official statement accompanying the news of Part 2’s release date, we, too, can only speculate as to why Summit has chosen to wait a full year between releasing the two films. One likely reason is the already-crowded summer 2012 movie calendar, which has been padded with several other highly anticipated and established franchise films. “The Avengers,” “Madagascar 3” and “Men in Black 3” all open in May; June will deliver a “Star Trek” sequel; the re-booted “Spider-Man” is nestled in the July 4 slot (occupied this year by “Eclipse”), followed closely by another “Ice Age” and a third “Batman.” Now that both films’ release dates are set, there are a few other unresolved “Dawn” issues, namely the MPAA rating and whether director Bill Condon will choose to film the two parts in 3-D. “That decision has yet to be made,” Summit distribution chief Richie Fay told MTV of the rating question last month. “It’s still the source of a discussion.” The 3-D conversation, on the other hand, involves both financial and creative decisions. “There’s certainly a financial part of the discussion,” Ray said. “And yes, there’s a certain amount of technology that has to be considered and accounted for. But it really comes down to the creative folks. “In any of these roundtable conversations, [Summit CEO] Rob Friedman has always been concerned about the ‘Twilight’ patron,” Fay added. “His concern is always the people that come in to see this movie. He doesn’t want to turn them off or offend. That’s why it’s a creative decision. A big factor is the perception of our audience. What are their feelings going to be? If it lends itself to being a better movie because of 3-D, then that’s the technology we’ll use.” What do you think of the “Breaking Dawn, Part 2” release date? How painful will the almost one-year wait be for you? Let us know in the comments! Check out everything we’ve got on “The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn.” For young Hollywood news, fashion and “Twilight” updates around the clock, visit HollywoodCrush.MTV.com . Related Videos ‘Twilight’ Stars Talk ‘Breaking Dawn’

Read the original:
‘Breaking Dawn, Part 2’ To Be Released November 2012

Top 16 Online Casual Encounter, Booty Call, and Hook-Up Sites

Seriously, who goes online today to find their “soul mates” or the “love of their lives”? OK, so some still do just that. A lot of people who check out dating sites, however, do so with only one thing in mind: To score.

Top 25 Online Casual Encounter, Booty Call, and Hook-Up Sites

Seriously, who goes online today to find their “soul mates” or the “love of their lives”? OK, so some still do just that. A lot of people who check out dating sites, however, do so with only one thing in mind: To score.