Tag Archives: reputation

In Honor of the Machete Controversy: 5 Movies that Make Texas Look Good

Apparently, the Texas Film Commission has denied tax incentives to Robert Rodriguez’s Machete , citing a state code that bars incentives for films that contain “…content that portrays Texas or Texans in a negative fashion.” They didn’t cite any examples, but Robert De Niro’s corrupt Texas politician who murders illegal immigrants probably could have been construed this way. That said, it seems like most movies set in Texas don’t do the lone star state many favors. I mean, The Texas Chainsaw Massacre damages the reputation of their BBQ ! But for the sake of positivity (and because there are too many of the negative Texas movies to list), let’s take a look at five films that might have actually helped state tourism.

See the article here:
In Honor of the Machete Controversy: 5 Movies that Make Texas Look Good

Judge to Chris Brown: You’re Awesome!

Chris Brown may have severely beaten Rihanna and tarnished his reputation and career beyond repair, but he’s earning A+ marks for his probation work since! During a progress report hearing in his assault case, the judge said she was not just satisfied, but blown away by Chris’ work ethic, telling the embattled star: “No one has ever done a better or more consistent job than you have.” At last Chris Brown has something to smile about . Brown, who pleaded guilty to felony assault in June 2009, only has seven domestic violence sessions left, and he’s completed 581 hours of community service (trash pickup and whatnot) … which still leaves 819 hours. Not exactly a slap on the wrist. Good to see him taking this so seriously and putting in the time to better society and himself after what he did, at least. Don’t expect any probation violations from this guy. Lindsay Lohan and T.I. should take notice!

Read the original post:
Judge to Chris Brown: You’re Awesome!

Does Power Breed Hypocrisy?

It seems every few weeks a new story hits the headlines exposing a politician for some misstep in his personal life that contradicts the “family values” campaign on which he was elected. Perplexed by these double standards, a team of professors from the Netherlands and Illinois conducted a series of five experiments and found that when everyday people are put into positions of power, they are prone to increased moral hypocrisy. The five experiments the professors devised ran through different morality-testing scenarios such as stealing a bicycle and evading taxes. Each scenario led to a common conclusion: while leaders hold their followers to high standards, they are not nearly as strict when it comes to their own personal behavior. The participants assigned the most powerful status indicated they would look down on others the most for fudging numbers for financial gain. Participants were told that for helping with the experiment, they could enter a lottery to win a prize. Participants privately rolled dice to determine the number of lottery tickets they would win (more tickets, more chances to win). The high-power participants also won the highest number of lottery tickets, indicating that they in fact cheated to gain more lottery tickets. Meaning the high-power participants judged others harshly for cheating, and then turned around and cheated themselves. Another interesting result came from fifth experiment in the research study, wherein the subjects indicated their own power status as well as whether they deserved this position of power. The powerful individuals who genuinely believed they earned their status by far exhibited the most moral hypocrisy. Psychology Today offers two possible explanations for this phenomenon. First, leaders can “delude themselves that they are working for the greater good” and consequently make exceptions for themselves. Second, politicians recognize that they are able to get away with misdeeds, so they opt to take advantage of their position’s privileges. Fear of losing power could be the key to keeping the powerful honest. The researchers found the only way to force a person of power to be honest was if “if the powerful sense that their unrestrained self-enrichment leads to gossiping, derision, and the undermining of their reputation.” Why are people more likely to cut themselves some slack when they are in a leadership position? Perhaps, nothing reminds your ego how powerful you are than when you break the rules. Read more at FYI Living: http://fyiliving.com/depression/causes-and-symptoms/does-power-breed-hypocrisy/#… added by: singrrr

‘Dancing With The Stars’ Cast Most A-List Ever? Experts Weigh In!

Huge ratings and big stars like the Situation have made ‘DWTS’ a ‘go-to TV show,’ says one pop-culture expert. By Jocelyn Vena “Dancing with the Stars” cast Photo: ABC With names as recognizable as the Situation, David Hasselhoff, Audrina Patridge, Michael Bolton and “Brady Brunch” vet Florence Henderson, the 11th season of “Dancing With the Stars” is shaping up to be one of the most pop-culturally relevant in the show’s five-year history. And experts contend that the show, which premiered on Monday night, now has enough clout to book not only celebrities with a legitimate footnote in pop-culture history but also stars at the peak of their careers. “Well, I think it’s just the nature of the beast, both the show and reality TV in general, that they are bigger now than they were when ‘Dancing With the Stars’ started,” said TVGuide.com staff editor Joyce Eng, explaining why this season packs so much star power. “Two of [the contestants] are reality stars. I don’t think it’s that surprising for them to do another reality show, especially for the Sitch, capitalizing on his fame now.” David Caplan, an entertainment journalist who has worked at celebrity magazines including People and Star, had another explanation, saying that the show has gone beyond camp value and is now considered by many to be legitimate work. ” ‘Dancing With the Stars’ has established itself as a go-to TV show,” he said. “It has incredible ratings, and by doing this show it allows a lot of people to expand their platform. You go on ‘Dancing With the Stars’ and you generate so much more press. For instance, some celebrity weekly will do a ‘How Bristol Palin Got in Shape’ story.” So how did it happen? Well, Caplan said, each new season added to a snowball effect. “It started off small,” he added, “and then progressed each season as more relevant people realized, ‘This is good for my career.’ ” Eng added, “As for other big names [besides Audrina and the Situation], the show has pursued certain people for years, and I think it’s entirely possible that some stars were skeptical, tentative about signing on in the earlier seasons,” she said. “But now that the show has blown up or friends/ old co-stars have gone on [ cough ] the Hoff [ cough ], ‘90210’ people, they’ve joined.” Brad Witter, a reporter at US Weekly, noted that season 11’s contestants have the celebrity factor that makes them appealing to viewers — and the tabloids. “In the past, ‘Dancing With the Stars’ got the reputation that it’s for washed-up people, but as the seasons have gone on, it’s gotten more popular, and the ratings are huge,” Witter explained. “A lot of people that are on this season are people that have been in the spotlight up until now and are still running in our magazine. This season, it’s people that America already cares about and are invested in.” What did you think of the “DWTS” premiere episode? Tell us in the comments! Related Photos Other MTV Stars Who Should Be On ‘Dancing With The Stars’ ‘Dancing With The Stars’ Season 11 Cast Revealed!

Read more here:
‘Dancing With The Stars’ Cast Most A-List Ever? Experts Weigh In!

CNN’s Larry King Replacement Praises Obama For Improving America’s Image Abroad

In a Thursday interview with CBS Early Show special contributor Amanda Holden, Larry King replacement Piers Morgan talked about his new CNN show and who would be at the top of his guest list: “Well, I’d love to do President Obama. I like what he’s done for the reputation of America abroad, which I’m not sure many Americans fully understand.” The second on Morgan’s list: “Bill Clinton, another one….One of the most charismatic people I’ve ever seen.” At the mention of Clinton, Holden gushed: “Oh, yes. I’d love you to interview him.” Holden concluded her report by proclaiming: “[Piers] is a complete news junky and he tells me that he cannot wait for the next big story to break….he knew he wanted to be a reporter since he was 6 years old. Aww. Replacing Larry King is really a dream come true for him.” While teasing Holden’s exclusive interview with Morgan earlier in the broadcast, co-host Harry Smith gave the British talker a ringing endorsement: “…the big headline, Piers Morgan gets Larry King’s job….He’s got an amazing, interesting newspaper background and he may actually have the right feet to fill those shoes.” Here is a full transcript of Holden’s September 9 interview with Morgan: 7:01AM ET TEASE: HARRY SMITH: Also this morning, the big headline, Piers Morgan gets Larry King’s job. People have seen him on a talent show, whatever it is, but people across America say, ‘who is this guy?’ Our Amanda Holden, our good pal, they’re very good friends. We have an exclusive with Amanda and Piers and she’s going to tell us all about the guy. He’s got an amazing, interesting newspaper background and he may actually have the right feet to fill those shoes. ERICA HILL: Oh, looking forward to that. 7:17AM ET TEASE: SMITH: Also, we’re going to hear from Piers Morgan, exclusively, about his new gig replacing Larry King on CNN. 7:30AM ET TEASE: SMITH: Coming up, an exclusive look at the man trying to fill some big suspenders. Piers Morgan is taking over for Larry King on CNN starting in January. He’s a much bigger name in Britain than he is here. And our friend, Amanda Holden, who’s a pretty big name herself over there, had a talk with Piers about his plans for his new role.                                      7:37AM ET TEASE: SMITH: Up next, the new Larry King, minus the suspenders. Our Amanda Holden has an Early Show exclusive interview with Piers Morgan. He’ll be taking over that time slot at CNN. 7:40AM ET SEGMENT: HARRY SMITH: CNN has officially announced that Piers Morgan from ‘America’s Got Talent’ will replace Larry King when he leaves his long-running prime time program in January. Early Show special contributor Amanda Holden recently visited with Piers Morgan. She joins us now from London with an Early Show exclusive. Amanda, good morning. AMANDA HOLDEN: Good morning, Harry. Well, some of you know me as one of the judges on ‘Britain’s Got Talent.’ Truth be told, I sit right between Piers Morgan and Simon Cowell, quite an extraordinary place to be, let me tell you. On American television, Piers is seen weekly as a talent judge, but in England he’s also known as a veteran journalist who’s covered news all over the world. I sat down with Piers for a personal conversation and he told me how he approached CNN and then campaigned to replace the king of talk. LARRY KING: Welcome to CNN, Piers. PIERS MORGAN: Thank you very much. It’s a great honor- HOLDEN: With that hand shake Larry King ended an era and handed over the reins of his 25-year-old show to British journalist Piers Morgan. KING: With that chapter closing I’m looking forward to the future. What my next chapter will bring. But for now, for here, it’s time to hang up the nightly suspenders. HOLDEN: It was a storied career that included some 40,000 interviews, King’s been the man everyone’s opened up to. KING: Who gave you this ring? ELIZABETH TAYLOR: Richard. HOLDEN: A frenzy of speculation erupted as to who would replace the industry legend. Familiar names like Ryan Seacrest, Joy Behar, and Howard Stern were mentioned. The name that quickly emerged as the frontrunner was actually the British journalist. MORGAN: If I’m as memorable in 40 years’ time as he’s become, I’ll be absolutely thrilled. HOLDEN: Now in one of his very first interviews since the news became public, Morgan says the enormity of the job is still sinking in. MORGAN: I’ll admit, he’s one of my heroes. And what I loved about the show, always, is that he could do a president one minute and Paris Hilton the next and be equally comfortable. [CLIP FROM ‘AMERICA’S GOT TALENT’] MORGAN: And I decided there were too many missed notes. HOLDEN: Many recognize Piers in this country as a talent show and from the show that discovered Susan Boyle, ‘Britain’s Got Talent.’ He also happens to be one of the most respected interviewers in the U.K. On his show, ‘Piers Morgan’s Life Stories,’ he’s faced off with prime ministers. MORGAN: Well let me spell it out for you, there are a lot of narcotics swashing around in university. GORDON BROWN: No, I’ve never touched cannabis, never touched any hard drugs. MORGAN: Never inhaled, exhaled. HOLDEN: My husband always says that you – you pump the cushions up nicely – plump them up – and then you whack them. MORGAN: I don’t think I whack people, but I do, I think probably what I’m known for in Britain most is asking very direct questions. MORGAN: How vain are you? SIMON COWELL: Not that vain, actually. I’m actually not. MORGAN: How have you kept a straight face saying that? Actually, I know how you kept a straight face. From the Botox. HOLDEN: Piers’ unique style has made him an insider on both sides of the Atlantic, from Hollywood’s elite to Britain’s royals. MORGAN: I had a lunch with Diana and Prince William when he was 13. She looked absolutely beautiful in the flesh. I remember thinking the most beautiful woman I’ve ever seen in my life. HOLDEN: Now obviously, American audiences have absolutely no idea, really, of your journalistic background. And you have feasted on celebrities in our country. MORGAN: Well, I find the celebrity culture fascinating, but I also find a lot of them to be overpaid, underworked, pampered little prima donnas. So when I find whining celebrities, it really gets on my nerves. HOLDEN: With his new CNN show starting in January, it’s not too soon for Piers to be thinking about who he’d like to talk to. MORGAN: Well, I’d love to do President Obama. I like what he’s done for the reputation of America abroad, which I’m not sure many Americans fully understand. Bill Clinton, another one. HOLDEN: Oh, yes. I’d love you to interview him. MORGAN: One of the most charismatic people I’ve ever seen. I’d also love to get Mel Gibson, what a story he’s got to tell. HOLDEN: Yeah. No matter who he’s sitting across from, Piers is determined to make his mark on TV. MORGAN: I want to become the person that, you know, big stars in America, big public figures, feel they can go to for an entertaining encounter, but they’ll be thinking that wasn’t an easy ride. That’s the perfect interview environment. HOLDEN: Piers’ now show doesn’t have a name yet, but it will be based in New York. He’ll also shuttle between Los Angeles and London. He’s a complete news junky and he tells me that he cannot wait for the next big story to break. His grandfather was journalist, as was his father for a while, and he said that he knew he wanted to be a reporter since he was 6 years old. Aww. Replacing Larry King is really a dream come true for him. SMITH: Talk to me a little bit more about his background, because we really only know him from the reality show here in the United States and a little from the one in the U.K.. He really does have a kind of a wide knowledge of all kinds of celebrities. HOLDEN: I mean, he has dozens and dozens of celebrities he’s interviewed. And many of them now have become his friends. I can tell you one story that I can share that he – Piers told me that he was actually the person that introduced Paul McCartney to Heather Mills and encouraged him to go out with her. And we all know how that ended. And apparently, Sir Paul McCartney later said, ‘thanks, mate, that cost me 50 million.’ SMITH: Just 50 million. HOLDEN: Oh, and another bit of juicy gossip was that Piers told me that Sarah Ferguson begged him for an introduction to Tiger Woods just – well, not near the scandal, but a few years before the scandal broke. But he didn’t. And I think she had a lucky escape because she might have been on that list of conquests. SMITH: Wow, there you go. Amanda, thank you so much. Love the insight. HOLDEN: Thank you. SMITH: We’re all voting yes for the new do, by the way. HOLDEN: Oh, bless you. Thank you. SMITH: Alright, have a good day. HOLDEN: Loving yours as always, Harry. SMITH: Amanda, thank you so much.

See the article here:
CNN’s Larry King Replacement Praises Obama For Improving America’s Image Abroad

Cool Green Bus Terminal Coming to San Francisco

An artist’s conception of the green new Transbay Terminal being built in San Francisco. Image via Inhabitat . One of my favorite things to do in Turkey is go down to the main otogar (bus station), ask around for buses to interesting destinations, and hop on. The station itself is no great shakes architecturally or anything, but I love the hustle and bustle and the feeling that a whole country’s worth of options is open to me. That sense of possibility and movement draws me to trans… Read the full story on TreeHugger

Continue reading here:
Cool Green Bus Terminal Coming to San Francisco

Scientists Drill into Ancient Coral Reefs To Find Secrets About Surviving Rising Seas

Photo Credit: ECORD/IODP via Live Science In an instance where drilling into the Great Barrier Reef is a good thing, scientists are pulling core samples of ancient coral to unravel how sea level changes have impacted corals in the past, and perhaps help predict what can happen to them in the future as they struggle with relatively rapid shifts in their marine environments. The corals they’re studying lived about 20,000 years ago when the planet was about 9 degrees F cooler than present temperatures, and their grow… Read the full story on TreeHugger

Read the original post:
Scientists Drill into Ancient Coral Reefs To Find Secrets About Surviving Rising Seas

A Technical Look At Termite Mounts Foretells Changes in Africa’s Ecosystems

Photo by sheilaellen Despite their reputation as pests, termites are actually fascinating creatures particularly for their complex social structures. But that isn’t the only thing that hast attracted the attention of scientists lately. It seems that by watching where termites decide to build mounds, secrets to the ecological changes of Africa’s savanna are revealed. Researchers at the Carnegie Instution’s Department of Global Ecology mapped over 40,000 termite mounds across 192 square miles of savanna, and through their imaging and analysis of the mounds, they’ve found … Read the full story on TreeHugger

Excerpt from:
A Technical Look At Termite Mounts Foretells Changes in Africa’s Ecosystems

A Brutally Liberal Cartoonist: The Secret to Newspaper ‘Credibility and Prestige’?

Long-time Los Angeles Times political cartoonist Paul Conrad has died, but the most interesting paragraph of his obituary in The Washington Post is the little hint by Post writer Matt Schudel that great newspapers only gain that reputation once they become liberal: He won his first Pulitzer in 1964, then left Denver for Los Angeles. Mr. Conrad’s incisive cartoons, which he drew six days a week, helped raise the reputation of the once-moribund Times, which had parroted the Republican Party line for decades . A similar version of this trope appeared in the Los Angeles Times itself in a story by James Rainey, but at least it suggested that there might be a difference between mediocre reporting and a Republican viewpoint. Conrad viciously attacked Nixon and Reagan with his pen, which was and is apparently the secret of media prestige: In the early 1960s, The Times was just beginning to rouse itself from decades of mediocrity. The newspaper had been politically and economically dominant in Southern California but a laughingstock in most of the country because of its mediocre journalism and blatant Republican boosterism. Otis Chandler took control as publisher in 1960 and, with Editor Nick Williams, decided to hire top talent to lift the paper to a higher level. The duo, determined to bring Conrad to Los Angeles, impressed him with their resolve. “The one thing I said,” Conrad recalled, “was, ‘Nobody tells me what to draw.'” The arrival of Conrad jarred many Times readers, not least the ultra-conservative members of the extended Chandler family, who already were displeased that their more liberal cousin, Otis, had taken control of the family business. “Nick [Williams] saw that Paul was this strident and very dedicated liberal and Nick thought that I would take a real beating, which I did,” Chandler said in a 2006 PBS documentary about the cartoonist. “But it was worth it, because he’s a real genius. He brought enormous credibility and prestige to The Times .”

See the original post here:
A Brutally Liberal Cartoonist: The Secret to Newspaper ‘Credibility and Prestige’?

Journalism Institute Honors Dan Rather; He Calls for ‘Trust-Busting’ Our Media Monopoly

The Poynter Institute welcomed disgraced former CBS anchor Dan Rather to share his thoughts on his long career and on the media in general this week. In an interview with Poynter’s Mallary Tenore , he complained “So often, particularly covering politics, enterprises that describe themselves as journalistic enterprises, and journalists who describe themselves as journalists, in fact just become transmission belts.” That’s exactly what Poynter’s interview was, a transmission belt for Rather’s lamest hits, including how the press needs a “spine transplant” and his shameless insistence that his phony-documents Texas Air National Guard story is still true. If Poynter cared about the reputation of journalism, why continue to entertain and spread doubt about the falsehood of Rather’s most atrocious “scoop”? The only thing fresh here is Rather’s growing socialism , as he insists (just like Bill Moyers) that money is corrupting politics and the government needs to break some alleged media monopoly where only four mega-corporations distribute most of America’s news: So number one is journalists need to get back to their business of being patriotic journalists in a free and democratic country and perform their function as watchdogs, as part of the system of checks and balances. We all know that huge sums of money are corrupting the whole political process, beginning with elections. For example, the last presidential election in this country, when all was said and done and you put everything together, costs more than $2 billion. That’s what was spent through the primaries, through the general election, all told. That money, not all of it came from special interests, but the bulk of it came from special interests — big pharmaceutical companies, big broadcasting networks, television, radio, electronic, big labor — and that’s a very short list. But you have a more recent example here in Florida where just to win a primary, at least two candidates spend what, more than $50 million or $60 million of their own money. This has reached the serious out-of-whack stage. So you say how can we improve coverage? Getting serious about where the money comes from, who gives it to whom, for what purpose — and most of it is given for a purpose. The case can be made — and I’m here to make it — that very large, international corporations, conglomerates control the government, and I would include some elements of big labor in that. The public is not well-served by political coverage as it is today. And I think it has to be noted, and there’s no joy in noting this, that in many important ways, very big business is in bed with big government and whoever’s in power in Washington, whether it be Republicans or Democrats — not in the public interest, but in the business interest of the huge corporations and in the staying in power business of those in Washington. And this seriously affects news coverage. Someone might say, well what is he talking about? Well let me give you an example. As recently as the 1950s, mid-1950s, there were more than 50 news enterprises, which is to say businesses, in the country that could accurately be described as having national distribution or large regional distribution. Now, there are no more than six, and I would argue only four, very large conglomerate, international corporations who control more than 80 percent of the national distribution of news. This is out of whack . Let me pause and say I’ve never worked for anybody in the enterprise other than a profit-making enterprise. I believe in the capital system, but as applied to media, we have in no small degree monopolies now. Now a great Republican president, Theodore Roosevelt did his party great service, and more importantly his country a great service, by breaking up the trust, which is to say the monopolies at the turn of the 20th century …. I’m not a business person, but in the end I think they’re not in the best interest of American business. I recognize that one gets criticized very heavily when get into this area, but I’m at the age and stage in my own career where I try to draw from my experience. I love this country, I want the country to be better for my children and grandchildren as most Americans do. And when and if the public finally get focused on this — that too few big international companies control too much of the national news distribution — then I think it may change. But until the public really understands what is happening with this, and understands that it is not a special pleading of journalists such as myself, can we come back to a really vibrant, truly independent, fiercely independent press that is important to the survival of freedom and representing government as we know it. Rather should really be writing for The Nation or Mother Jones, with this kind of hard-left talk about capitalism despoiling democracy. Poynter’s Tenore is especially embarrassing when asking Rather about the latest Internet trends, where he is clearly not well versed. He claimed “There are very few journalism enterprises on the Internet” and couldn’t answer whether he has his own personal Facebook page:  “I don’t think so.” Shouldn’t a journalist who insists his craft is so grievously lacking be a little more up-to-date?

See the original post here:
Journalism Institute Honors Dan Rather; He Calls for ‘Trust-Busting’ Our Media Monopoly