New York City residents were treated yesterday to a reminder that it’s Shark Week on Syfy, only this one didn’t involve a cat riding a Roomba . A transit authority conductor came across a dead shark aboard a subway in Queens on Wednesday, asking passengers to exit the train car so the unusual item could be removed. When a supervisor got a closer look at the animal, he noticed a cigarette in its mouth with a fare card and Red Bull can nearby. So it’s likely that a Shark Week fan was simply playing a prank, but it still begs the question: Where does one find a shark to kill in New York City?!? Dead Shark in Subway Car
Actor Terrence Howard is being accused by his ex-wife Michelle Ghent of beating her up badly during a heated argument in Costa Rica – just last week. Michell, who divorced Terrence in May, hooked up with him again recently. She then took a trip with Terrence and several of his family members to Costa Rica, where sources say an epic and violent argument erupted last week. Terrence Howard claims Michelle maced him, his adult daughter and another family member. Police were called to the scene and reports were taken. No one was arrested there that we know of, but it gets weirder still: Sources close to Michelle say that Terrence made up the mace story to cover up his brutality, while sources close to Terrence say Michelle is lying. This also isn’t the first time their relationship has gotten combative. She has accused Terrence Howard of abuse in the past, which he denies. In their divorce case, she said the beatings began just a week into their marriage. Michelle Ghent is supposedly going to court this week in an attempt to get a restraining order against her former spouse, who she fears will come after her. We weren’t there and have no idea who’s telling the truth, but probably not a good idea to get back together a third time, you guys. Just don’t do it. And don’t mention Oprah’s tig ol’ bitties either, T.
Those who tuned in for the beginning of Shark Week on the Discovery Channel might have been waiting for that moment they realized they were being rickrolled. The channel kicked off their legendary week celebrating the deep sea killers with the most infamous of sharks, Megalodon. In a two hour documentary, they took a good look at the mythic creature and did their best to draw him out. In fact, they even used a “chum cannon” to help facilitate what they called “power chumming” to hopefully arouse the beast. That’s right, power chumming. If you didn’t realize the “documentary” was fake by that point, well then…. Of course, this is the internet, and there are plenty of people just waiting, ready and willing, to complain about every little thing. Including a fake documentary about (likely) fictitious animal. Angry viewers have taken to Shark Week’s Facebook page in angry droves. With complaints ranging from “disappointed” to the more elaborate, “Absolutely disgusted with the kick off of shark week. Fake documentary on Magalodon. Way to go discovery channel. You should change your name to Fantasy Channel. Like I said, absolutely disgusted. Another year like this and Shark Week will be extinct too.” Lesson learned. Megalodon may not be real, but there is no doubt that internet rage lives on! Have no fear though, it appears as if “real” Shark Week programming will return tonight.
With the Olympics ending in spectacular fashion last night, you may be experiencing Epic Television Withdrawal. (We're right there with you!) So isn't it. View original post here: Nina Dobrev, Justin Bieber Ready To Bite Into Shark Week
I met Abel Ferrara in a café on Mulberry Street. In an hour’s time, he didn’t once take his seat. The filmmaker makes a couple of phone calls, goes to the bathroom twice, shows me the new Web series that he’s developing with Vice TV on, and points me to two different articles about his movies. Unkempt and energetic, the Bronx-born director of such New York notorieties as Ms. 45 , King of New York , Bad Lieutenant , The Funeral and this week’s 4:44 Last Day on Earth is exactly what you’d imagine he’d be like if he were one of his movie’s characters. In a way, he is. 4:44 features Willem Dafoe and Shanyn Leigh as a couple spending their last hours together before the world ends. They’re each in their own separate but related worlds: she paints and listens to Buddhist philosophy while he talks to friends via Skype and decides if he should end two years of sobriety by getting high one last time. The loose nature of 4:44 ’s scenario speaks to the Cassavetes-inspired, improv-oriented nature of Ferrara’s dramas, which are often collaborative processes between actor and filmmaker. This is especially characteristic of Ferrara’s working relationship with Dafoe. “If Willem wasn’t going to play it,” Ferrara told me, “I don’t think I would have wrote the script.” The film marks Ferrara and Dafoe’s third film together, coming after 1998’s New Rose Hotel and the 2007 ensemble piece Go Go Tales (which itself almost became a series on HBO). But more importantly, 4:44 further refines a working relationship that involves Dafoe co-creating not only his character, but also the scenes that, as Ferrara tells it, the actor is “comfortable with, that he believes in, that he understands.” “[We have] confidence with each other that comes from working together,” Ferrara continued. “I wrote the character so that the character I wrote is something he can play. And then, to create a stage for him, a place where he’s going to act, a set, which is a place that’s going to be conducive for him to do his best work. There’s nothing throwing him off…” Paradoxically or not, Ferrara then interrupted himself to perform one of a seemingly Herculean list of multi-tasks. Ultimately, performance is key to Ferrara’s movies because his characters are always performing for each other. They change in almost every scene they’re in, keeping the films that contain them endlessly revelatory, even shocking. Take Bad Lieutenant , which this year celebrates its 20th anniversary of Harvey Keitel’s searing work as a sex-, drug- and gambling-addicted cop seeking both vengeance and kicks as he pursues the men who sexually assaulted a nun. His detour into depravity culminates in an infamous scene where he pulls over two young women, making them simulate giving him oral sex while he masturbates. It’s the type of blunt-force intimacy that has preoccupied Ferrara all the way through 4:44 but arguably reached its flashpoint with the NC-17 Lieutenant . Two decades on, the 60-year-old director looks back on the controversy with similarly matter-of-fact zeal. “It had to be unrated,” he said. “It had to be rated X. It was the opposite: it couldn’t be rated R. We had to be what Hollywood couldn’t be. It was reverse censorship.” Not that he minds the continuing existence of an R-rated version necessitated by such once-powerful video chains as Blockbuster: “That’s just a joke; I’m not counting on anybody watching that.” The editing process is just another way Ferrara fulfills his all-encompassing role as director-cum-emcee. From early conception — “A script is not a piece of literature,” he explained, “it’s a process” — to post-production, Ferrara officiates over his films the way Ray Ruby, Dafoe’s hero from Go Go Tales , presides over his embattled burlesque dominion. He works with regular collaborators like cinematographer Ken Kelsch and production designer Frank DeCurtis to give his actors a proper setting. Then, led by their maestro, they all perform in front of and behind the camera together. But collaboration shouldn’t be mistaken for compromise, that ever-present threat to the natures of complex characters like Keitel’s Lieutenant and Dafoe’s Cisco and even to Ferrara’s singular vision itself. “There’s no such thing as a non-final cut director,” Ferrara said, R-rated Bad Lieutenant notwithstanding. “If you don’t have final cut, you’re not a director. There’s no point making a film. Citizen Kane is a masterpiece, but if I go into the editing room for three hours, I can change Citizen Kane .” Meanwhile, the endlessly moving Ferrara has more important projects than Citizen Kane to worry about: His own, including a planned take on the Dominique Strauss-Kahn case starring Gerard Depardieu — about which the filmmaker wishes to remain tight-lipped. “It takes six months to shoot a film,” he said. “We’re [always] perfecting what we’re doing.” Read Stephanie Zacharek’s review of 4:44 Last Day on Earth here . Simon Abrams is a NY-based freelance film critic whose work has been featured in outlets like The Village Voice, Time Out New York, Vulture and Esquire. Additionally, some people like his writing, which he collects at Extended Cut . [Top photo: Getty Images]
Exciting news today from the mockbuster mavens at The Asylum : The B-movie specialists have announced their next creature feature, Mega Shark vs. Mecha Shark , a sequel to 2009’s Mega Shark vs. Giant Octopus and its 2010 follow-up Mega Shark vs. Crocosaurus . This time around the hardy Mega Shark faces the ultimate enemy: Mecha Shark, “her mechanical doppelganger.” Contain yourselves! “The fan response to the Mega Shark franchise has been rabid,” said The Asylum partner Paul Bales in a statement. “In addition to a very persuasive online petition, we found that Mega Shark has taken on a life of her own. We’ve received photos of Mega Shark cakes, toys and games on a near-daily basis, and we thought it was high time she did battle with an iconic Mecha monster.” If you’ve been resistant to the charms of the Asylum’s brand of so bad they’re good genre pics and blockbuster knock-offs, now’s the time to come to terms with the truth: This is the closest cinema has come to replicating Gojira and its kaiju brethren since the golden years of Toho. What’s more, Mega Shark vs. Mecha Shark will mark The Asylum’s first-ever trilogy. High five, guys! Let’s have a toast to the franchise contributions of Debbie Gibson and Jaleel White! Someone get me a Mega Shark cake! Take a look back at Mega Shark’s greatest hits and brainstorm: Which former ’80s/’90s idol will lead the cast this time around? Mega Shark vs. Giant Octopus : Mega Shark vs. Crocosaurus :
Twilight idol Taylor Lautner may be new to the action hero game — well, at least as a young adult, now that his Shark Boy days are long gone — but he had a seasoned vet by his side on the set of John Singleton’s Abduction : Ellen Ripley herself, Sigourney Weaver. As a therapist to Lautner’s thrill-seeking teenager, who stumbles into the spy game after discovering the truth about his own childhood, she shows her young co-star how it’s done, effortlessly and with grace. But it wasn’t Lautner who studied Weaver’s body of work for pointers; instead, Weaver admitted, it was she who studied Lautner’s work — his work in the Twilight movies.
www.youtube.com twitter.com Makin’ Babies is easy and getting the hot chicks is a piece of cake as long as you don’t mind payin’ the price!!! Join CARRIE KEAGAN foranother exclusive and uncensored episode of NO GOOD TV’s UP CLOSE featuring the funny guys from the cast of the comedy The Brothers Solomon starring Will Arnett and Will Forte! NO GOOD TELEVISION stars Carrie Keagan and Shark Firestone and showcases over a dozen original shows featuring raw, real and uncensored interviews with the biggest stars in the world from music, movies and TV. It also has uncensored, uncut, explicit and director’s cut versions of music videos. NO GOOD TV aka NGTV can be found at NGTV.com. It’s the most fun you’ll ever have with your pants on!!
Posted onDecember 7, 2010byBenny Hollywood|Comments Off on Frankenbombers: Al Qaeda hatches plot to implant explosives into suicide bombers
Al-Qaeda jihadists researching ways to evade airport security and murder “larger numbers of unbelievers and apostates” The moment that one of these bombs goes off on an airplane, the futility of the TSA's new scan-and-grope procedures will be abundantly clear even to the thickest of the learned analysts. But will there then be a shift toward a more intelligent security policy? Probably not. “'Frankenbombers': Al Qaeda hatches plot to implant explosives into suicide bombers,” by James White for the Daily Mail, December 6: Al-Qaeda fanatics may be planning a horrific 'Frankenbomber' suicide attack by implanting explosives into a human body. Defence analysts logged conversations between users of a online forum in which Muslim extremists debate terrorism methods which could beat new US aviation security checks. The alarming posts included one by a user who claimed to be a surgeon, promising a 'new kind of terrorism'. It called on bomb makers and doctors to create the perfect solution to murder 'larger numbers of unbelievers and apostates.' The post said: 'What is your opinion about surgeries through which I can implant the bomb… inside the operative's body? 'I am waiting for the interaction of the experienced brothers to connect the two sciences together and produce a new kind of terrorism, Allah willing.'… added by: crystalman
Comments Off on Frankenbombers: Al Qaeda hatches plot to implant explosives into suicide bombers
Some conspiracy theories are so laughable that it is obvious to the intelligent reader why they should be immediately dismissed. Unfortunately, when it comes to those involving Israel, such conspiracy theories seem to take on a life of their own, driven by anti-Semitism and hatred. Conspiracy theories about Israel and the Jews are common fare in the Middle East and disseminated widely in the Arab media. From accusations that the Jews were responsible for the 9/11 terror attacks to classic anti-Semitic blood libels, the Western mainstream media have failed to report on this as an issue of Arab incitement. The latest outlandish charge to be hurled at Israel is Mossad involvement in a spate of shark attacks in the Egyptian Red Sea resort of Sharm-el-Sheikh. Israeli officials have said that the claims are too ludicrous to respond to. The Independent at least described it as a “more bizarre theory”, while Sky News' Dominic Waghorn certainly got it, saying that “Egyptian officials have plumbed new depths of pottiness with their latest Zionist conspiracy theory.” Even the BBC made sure to note that “Conspiracy theories are always popular in the Middle East, with unlikely suggestions often made that troubles in Arab countries could be caused by Mossad agents.” The Scotsman, however, threw all journalistic credibility and professionalism out of the window with a sensationalist headline and story without even suggesting that the accusation is yet another product of a febrile imagination and a society raised on anti-Semitic conspiracy theories, the story states: '' Some said sharks had been drawn to shallow waters after cattle being shipped in for last month's Islamic feast of Eid al-Adha had died and were thrown overboard. Others suggested it could have been part of a secret plot by Israel's Mossad intelligence agency. “What is being said about the Mossad throwing the deadly shark (in the sea] to hit tourism in Egypt is not out of the question, but it needs time to confirm,” South Sinai governor Mohamed Abdel Fadil Shousha said.'' But it gets worse from a journalistic perspective. For The Scotsman had butchered an original piece from Reuters, deliberately changing the headline and cherry-picking the contents to turn it into a story about the Mossad rather than the shark attack itself. The Reuters piece, which is not centred around the Mossad charge, and headlined “Egypt puzzled after string of Red Sea shark attacks,” mentions more realistic theories to do with the shark's behaviour and includes the paragraph: Egyptians often blame neighbouring Israel for a variety of problems such as drug and weapon smuggling, or say it supports media that seek to portray Egypt in a bad light. While it is possible to criticise Reuters for not making it more abundantly clear as to the ridiculous nature of the Mossad charge, The Scotsman's editors have revealed something far more sinister behind the direction of their version of this story. Based on previous experience, The Scotsman is likely to claim that space issues prevented republishing the full Reuters piece. The reality is, however, that the shark attacks are a major international news story that has been widely covered in the mainstream media. What The Scotsman has done is inexcusable – turning a story about a spate of shark attacks into a sensationalised story of a ludicrous Israeli plot and then giving the conspiracy theory unwarranted credibility. added by: crystalman
Comments Off on Egyptian Shark Attack: Jews Not Jaws?