Tag Archives: truthdig

World Cup Open Thread: USA vs. England

The U.S. soccer team just tied England in an opening round World Cup match. Let’s talk soccer! 

Originally posted here:
World Cup Open Thread: USA vs. England

ABC News Featured Video: ‘Teens Hail Gay Prom King and Queen’

ABCNews.com on Saturday prominently featured a video about two gay students that won king and queen at their high school’s prom. “Hudson High, typical school with a typical senior prom, but not your every day prom king and queen,” began an unidentified reporter. “Meet Charlie Ferrusi and Tim Howard, class of 2010 prom royalty.” As the piece continued, an unidentified man said, “These are the kids that Dr. Martin Luther King was talking about. They don’t see each other as black and white or gay and straight.” The reporter let viewers know, “Charlie and Tim won in a landslide vote. The reaction has been positive even among parents” (video follows with commentary, h/t NBer SkipperMLM):   For those looking for more on this subject, “Related Links” were provided to videos about: a gay student winning prom queen in Hollywood, California; a Catholic church in Hingham, Massachusetts, not accepting a student because his parents were lesbians, and; plans for a gay and lesbian high school in Chicago falling threw. For the record, the Associated Press also found this story newsworthy. 

Go here to read the rest:
ABC News Featured Video: ‘Teens Hail Gay Prom King and Queen’

Bozell Column: MTV’s Pinata of Profanity

It should tell you something that MTV is still highly valued by Hollywood as the televised center of the coolness universe. Why else would a top movie star like Tom Cruise dress up ridiculously as a fat, bald, bearded guy and embarrass himself in a profanity-littered skit on the MTV Movie Awards? Cruise opened the show by saying he was going to take the program, put it up his posterior, and make it a diamond. He welcomed viewers to “Relax, and enjoy my two-hour giant s—.” And so it began, an apt description for the two hours that followed. What is it about celebrities that they have to – absolutely must – be obscene in front of audiences with millions of impressionable children watching? Broadcast networks have had repeated trouble at awards shows with celebrities cursing. But on cable television, which fears no fines or discipline from the Federal Communications Commission, MTV doesn’t see profanity as a shocking accident. On this show, it was an intentional profanity barrage. If you love infantile cursing as dearly as MTV does, it was a stimulating profanity bath. And it was staged. Actress Anna Kendrick asked, “Ready to make the censors’ ears bleed?” A review of the 122-minute special by the Culture and Media Institute found more than 100 swear words. (Once you remove the incessant commercials, that was more than one a minute.) Network censors bleeped 70 curse words, including a remarkable 47 variations of “f—,” 11 uses of “s—,” two of “a–h—,” one slang expression for breasts, and nine even the watchdogs couldn’t identify. But at least 30 profanities made it past the censors, including nine variations of “f—-,” two of “s—” and one “goddamn.” The censors didn’t even try to cover a whole host of other curse words. It was like candy coming out of a pinata. MTV censors grabbed as many as they could. One of the most egregious offenders was actor Peter Facinelli, who accepted the “Best Picture” award for the teen vampire drama “Twilight: New Moon.” He cooed “I’ve never heard the word ‘f—‘ used so many times in one evening.” He then went on to use it eight times himself, four of which made it past the censors. He only skipped cursing as he honored Stephenie Meyer, the author of the “Twilight” books, because he explained “she’s a Mormon.” That’s consideration, Hollywood-style.  MTV even worked the profanities into three award titles. One was the “Best Scared as S— Performance.” This apparently required S-bombs in the introduction, as comedian Steve Carell declared “When I watched [the low-budget horror movie] ‘Paranormal Activity,’ I literally s— myself.” When predictable controversy erupted, MTV issued a plastic apology: “The MTV Movie Awards is a live televised event known for irreverent comedy and a party atmosphere where our guests speak more freely than they otherwise might. While we aired the live broadcast with a delay, we were unable to mute every word that some might find objectionable. All of these words will be muted in subsequent airings.” That’s responsibility, Hollywood-style. Left unaddressed: how MTV’s “party atmosphere” was entirely their doing. All this cursing was about as unplanned as last year’s Movie Awards stunt, where Sacha Baron Cohen’s bare butt floated in the air just inches away from the face of the rapper Eminem, who feigned outrage and “stormed out.”  The idea that MTV execs would place any of the blame on the celebrities is simply laughable. They put cursing in their award titles, stuffed into their pre-recorded skit with Tom Cruise, and clearly expected a stream of it from their un-famous master of ceremonies, comedian Aziz Ansari. Many of these stars have no trouble appearing in other venues without cursing their faces off. Clearly, in this venue, they were bowing to what they felt MTV wanted. If this spectacle wasn’t enough, MTV heavily promoted throughout the Movie Awards show its new scripted comedy, “The Hard Times of R.J. Berger.” The show’s main plot device? Young Berger loses his pants on the high-school basketball court, demonstrating to the entire school that he has an enormous penis. That’s taste, Hollywood-style. MTV promos during the Movie Awards showed a godly glow coming from R.J.’s crotch, and twisted the Bible to joke “The meek shall inherit the girth.” Before his indecent exposure, R.J. lamented “I’m God’s urinal cake.” One nerdy girl tells R.J. “Any time, any place, any orifice.” She also refers to menstruation as “a vampire buffet.” The Los Angeles Times it declared this raunchy “Berger” show was like the movie “Superbad,” only “minus the humor, warmth, and believability” – and then declared MTV had a hit on its hands with it. Will MTV blame the actors on “Berger” for repeating the disgusting language of MTV’s script?

Originally posted here:
Bozell Column: MTV’s Pinata of Profanity

Letterman Guest Robert Klein Suggests Limbaugh’s Good Health is a Bad Thing

Appearing as a guest on Friday’s Late Show with David Letterman on CBS, left-wing comedian Robert Klein suggested that it was bad that Rush Limbaugh turned out to be in good health after his hospital visit in Hawaii, inspiring laughter from Letterman. Klein: “You lose some, you win some.” After Letterman brought up the birther conspiracy theory that President Obama was not born in America, Klein, who is known for attacking conservatives in his comedy act over sex scandals while being softer on liberals, changed the subject to Limbaugh’s fourth marriage to suggest that Limbaugh is hypocritical for opposing same-sex marriage, and then joked about the possibility of the conservative talker having health problems. Klein: What’s his name, Rush Limbaugh, who believes so much in the sanctity of marriage he’s done it four times now, you know, but, you know, not if he, doesn’t approve of marriage if both the husband and wife are circumcised, you know, that’s out of the question. I think a lot of that came from him, and, you know, he was in the hospital couple of months ago in Hawaii. Turned out to be nothing. See? You lose some, you win some. But anyway. Below is a transcript of the relevant portion of the Friday, June 11, Late Show with David Letterman: DAVID LETTERMAN: I’m ignorant in the world of politics, and I don’t know what the people that believe, and the ones who do believe, who really believe that he wasn’t born in this country, that they claim that he hasn’t produced a birth certificate. Do you have any understanding of why we’ve selected this to worry about? I mean, I believe he was born in the United States. ROBERT KLEIN: I’m not worried about it. It’s just, you know, dirty pool, and, you know, what’s his name, Rush Limbaugh, who believes so much in the sanctity of marriage he’s done it four times now, you know, but, you know, not if he, doesn’t approve of marriage if both the husband and wife are circumcised, you know, that’s out of the question. I think a lot of that came from him and, you know, he was in the hospital couple of months ago in Hawaii. Turned out to be nothing. See? You lose some, you win some. But anyway. (LETTERMAN LAUGHS) (AUDIENCE LAUGHTER AND APPLAUSE) LETTERMAN: Turned out to be nothing.

Excerpt from:
Letterman Guest Robert Klein Suggests Limbaugh’s Good Health is a Bad Thing

Is Karzai Losing The Faith?

Rumors are swirling in Afghanistan that the country’s president, Hamid Karzai, is losing faith in the capacity for the West to defeat the Taliban, and some are even accusing Karzai of trying to strike his own deal with the Taliban and arch-rival Pakistan. The rumors follow a dramatic meeting between Karzai and the just-resigned intelligence chief and interior secretary, both of whom defected from the administration after claims that Karzai was unwilling to show interest in evidence proving the Talbian’s culpability in a rocket attack earlier this month. —JCL The New York Times: Two senior Afghan officials were showing President Hamid Karzai the evidence of the spectacular rocket attack on a nationwide peace conference earlier this month when Mr. Karzai told them that he believed the Taliban were not responsible. “The president did not show any interest in the evidence — none — he treated it like a piece of dirt,” said Amrullah Saleh, then the director of the Afghan intelligence service. Mr. Saleh declined to discuss Mr. Karzai’s reasoning in more detail. But a prominent Afghan with knowledge of the meeting, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said that Mr. Karzai suggested in the meeting that it might have been the Americans who carried it out. Minutes after the exchange, Mr. Saleh and the interior minister, Hanif Atmar, resigned — the most dramatic defection from Mr. Karzai’s government since he came to power nine years ago. Mr. Saleh and Mr. Atmar said they quit because Mr. Karzai made clear that he no longer considered them loyal. Read more Related Entries June 11, 2010 British PM: 2010 ‘Vital’ for Afghanistan June 9, 2010 Kandahar Test [A Cartoon From UAE]

The rest is here:
Is Karzai Losing The Faith?

Chris Matthews: If Titanic Sank Today GOP Wouldn’t Support Requiring More Life Rafts on Ships

Chris Matthews said Friday that if the Titanic sank today, Republicans wouldn’t support requiring the shipping lines to have more life rafts and life preservers on their vessels. In an at times heated discussion about energy policy with Reps. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.) and Steve Scalise (R-La.), the “Hardball” host continually bashed the GOP. “The smartest move for your party is to screw things up for the next couple of years, right through November, get the country completely bollixed up, and they will vote Republican out of desperation, and you will have more power,” said Matthews. “Is that the strategy of the Republican Party this year?” When Scalise refuted this claim, Matthews added, “If the Titanic sank today, you know what the Republicans would be saying? Don`t be telling the shipping lines they need more life rafts or life preservers.” Scalise marvelously responded, “If the Titanic sank today, I`m sure the president would try to blame it on George Bush. And we have seen where that has gotten us” (video follows with partial transcript and commentary):  CHRIS MATTHEWS, HOST: Here`s Mitch McConnell`s position, which I think is not a position. He said: “What I believe most of my members, if not all of them, will not be interested in is seizing on the oil spill in the Gulf and using that as a rationale, if you will, for passing a national energy tax referred to down here at the White House as cap and trade.” Now, that`s a negative position. What is the positive position in terms of moving forward? And do you support some kind of negotiation with the Democrats, which never seems to get done in this presidency? You guys — McConnell from day one has said you guys` platform is no. That`s your platform. REP. DEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ (D), FLORIDA: That`s right. MATTHEWS: That`s what… (CROSSTALK) REP. STEVE SCALISE (R-LA), ENERGY & COMMERCE CMT: Well… MATTHEWS: Is he right? Is McConnell right? The smartest move for your party is to screw things up for the next couple of years, right through November, get the country completely bollixed up, and they will vote Republican out of desperation, and you will have more power? Is that the strategy of the Republican Party this year? Because McConnell says it is. MATTHEWS: What I see here… (CROSSTALK) MATTHEWS: What do I see? If the Titanic sank today, you know what the Republicans would be saying? Don`t be telling the shipping lines they need more life rafts or life preservers. Don`t get involved with industry telling them what to do. At some point, the government has to intervene, because the private sector is not doing the job. The private sector is what we`re seeing on that live bug every night on television. By the way, Congressman, that`s the work of the private sector without regulation. That`s what it looks like without being taxed heavily. Actually, what we’re seeing in the Gulf of Mexico right now indeed IS the result of an over-regulated industry. If our oil companies were allowed to drill in Alaska AND set up more rigs closer to the coast, they wouldn’t be drilling in mile-deep seas. For some reason folks like Matthews just don’t get that! But I digress:  SCALISE: Well, but the federal government is the regulator, Chris. (CROSSTALK) MATTHEWS: Your oil patch people have been getting away for centuries without paying taxes. You have had the biggest tax breaks in the world because you have controlled the Ways and Means Committee. You have controlled the Finance Committees and the regulating committees to the point there is no regulation of safety. This is either astonishing stupidity or an out and out lie. The Democrats have controlled both chambers of Congress — and therefore the Ways and Means Committee as well as the Finance Committees – since January 2007! That’s approaching three and a half years. In fact, Democrats have mostly controlled Congress since oil exploration began in this country. As such, any suggestion to the contrary is absurd. Fortunately, Scalise had the best line of the night:  MATTHEWS: You have had your way. So, that works. And we`re seeing it every night on the air. (CROSSTALK) SCALISE: If the Titanic sank today, I`m sure the president would try to blame it on George Bush. And we have seen where that has gotten us. (CROSSTALK) MATTHEWS: Well, that`s not useful. Actually, it’s quite useful — and spot on! Bravo, Congressman! Bravo! 

Read more:
Chris Matthews: If Titanic Sank Today GOP Wouldn’t Support Requiring More Life Rafts on Ships

Soccer: The Year of Africa

By Patrick Chappatte, Le Temps, Switzerland Related Entries June 9, 2010 NBA Leads Sports in Diversity June 9, 2010 Doctors Without Borders, With a Film Crew

Link:
Soccer: The Year of Africa

Putting the “I” in Environment

By David Sirota While British Petroleum and federal regulators are certainly at fault for their reckless behavior, every American who uses oil—which is to say, every American—is incriminated in this ecological holocaust. Related Entries June 10, 2010 Israel’s Gift to Iran’s Hard-Liners June 10, 2010 Sarah Palin: Competent Manager

The rest is here:
Putting the “I” in Environment

More Washington Post Hijinks? Reporter Cancels Book Party Appearance Hosted by Democrat Operative

It’s probably safe to assume that a lot of reporters in the mainstream media lean to the left side of the ideological spectrum. And it was seen throughout the health care debate over the past year and a half – that somehow we need to raise the rhetoric beyond hyperbole like death panels, etc. One of those reporters was The Washington Post’s health care reporter Ceci Connolly, who last summer appeared on MSNBC and made such a plea . And since then, she made other gestures to show she was in line with the Obama administration on this issue. Well, lo and behold, according to a story by Jeremy Peters posted on the New York Times Media Decoder blog , Connolly canceled an appearance at a party for the book, “Landmark: The Inside Story of America’s New Health Care Law and What it Means for All of Us,” which according to her Web site Connolly is “one of the main authors of the first definitive book on the 2010 health care law.” “[T]he Post found itself in another potentially embarrassing and ethically compromised position on Wednesday after one of its most senior reporters abruptly canceled an appearance at her own book party, which was being sponsored by a public relations firm with strong ties to the Democratic Party,” Peters wrote. That communications firm was Blue Line Strategic Communications, a public relations firm run by Michael Meehan and David DiMartino. Peters reported Meehan, a Democratic communications strategist, has had some very close ties to several Democrat campaigns. “Mr. Meehan was most recently an adviser to Martha Coakley, the Massachusetts attorney general who lost to Senator Scott Brown, the insurgent Republican candidate who captured Edward M. Kennedy’s former seat,” Peters wrote. “He was also a senior staff member in the Senate for years, working for some of the most powerful members, including John Kerry, Tom Daschle and Barbara Boxer.” Connolly’s questionable association with Blue Line Strategic Communications comes on the heels of abandoned plans by the Post’s publisher Katharine Weymouth to charge lobbyists and trade groups thousands of dollars for access “to top congressional and administration officials for $25,000 a plate” at a dinner party at her home. According to Peters, the book party went on with Connolly. However it does further beg the question if the Post’s reporting throughout the ObamaCare debate was really “objective.”

Read more from the original source:
More Washington Post Hijinks? Reporter Cancels Book Party Appearance Hosted by Democrat Operative

Against the Wishes of Arizona Lawmakers, America Is Getting More Diverse

Preliminary census data show that America’s melting pot is meltier than ever, with racial minorities now making up more than one-third of the nation’s population. Pretty soon the “minorities” will be in the majority, as they are in four states (California, New Mexico, Hawaii and Texas, where everything is bigger, anyway). AP reports that a Latino baby boom, aging baby boomers and more multiracial Americans are responsible for the trend. And then there are the paranoid and overwhelmingly white tea partiers who went into hiding. That must account for at least a couple dozen fewer Caucasians showing up in the census, no?