Tag Archives: united-states

BP Gulf Oil Spill By the Numbers

Image of oil spill on June 10th via NASA The BP Gulf spill has long been declared the greatest environmental disaster in US history. Millions of lives have been impacted, thousands of livelihoods lost, and unquantifiable damage done to wildlife and ecosystems. And while president Obama took the oval office last night to deliver a speech chock full of soaring rhetoric , many of the hard facts about the spill weren’t covered. So, in the interest of s… Read the full story on TreeHugger

The rest is here:
BP Gulf Oil Spill By the Numbers

“Jihad, Crips, extreme animal-rights activists, it’s all the same,” Says Homeland Security Official

Last week a Philadelphia appellate court announced (after months of silence) that it would not revisit the conviction of animal rights activists on terrorism charges. The SHAC 7 were convicted of conspiring to commit animal enterprise terrorism by running a controversial website that posted news of both legal and illegal actions, along with personal information of people connected to the notorious animal testing lab Huntingdon Life Sciences. Their campaign had brought the multinational corporation near bankruptcy. A three-judge panel of the court had previously upheld the conviction, and the defendants had asked that the full court review it. Now, the only option is to request that the Supreme Court of the United States review the case. There has been no official word about this yet, but multiple defendants have expressed their interest and having this landmark First Amendment case heard by the Supreme Court. Meanwhile, the lead prosecutor who helped secure this “victory in the War on Terrorism” has– surprise, surprise– been promoted. Charles McKenna is now the head of the New Jersey Office of Homeland Security and Preparedness. He was quoted a few days ago about his hopes for using new “anti-terrorism technology” in his new job. “We are particularly interested in computer profiling, which is much more sophisticated, and quicker, than traditional racial profiling,” he said. The targets of this new profiling technology? “Jihad, Crips, extreme animal-rights activists, it’s all the same: people trying damage the system,” added McKenna.“We need every trick in the book to avert disaster.” As you can see in this photo, the SHAC 7 are quite gangsta. But no reasonable person could argue that they are the “same” as violent street gangs and Islamic terrorists. Such absurd scare-mongering rhetoric has become normal for corporations, industry groups, and the politicians who represent them. When it is adopted by government officials who are in charge of keeping us safe, though, it has frightening implications. There are limited anti-terrorism and law enforcement resources. When people like McKenna let shameless political opportunism shape security priorities (and make no mistake, this is nothing but political opportunism–he has already been rewarded for defending the “system” from activists), it puts everyone at risk. added by: animalia_libero

The Bachelorette 2010: Kasey Kahl Creepy Tattoo (PHOTOS, VIDEO)

“The Bachelorette” contestant Kasey Kahl, the lucky guy who got a one-on-one date night at the museum with Ali in the last episode, vowed to guard and protect Ali Fedotowsky’s heart, but she was not impressed by his sweet talk. MORE http://bumpshack.com/2010/06/15/the-bachelorette-2010-kasey-kahl-creepy-tattoo-p… added by: c7girl

The United States Army Tortures Animals

I know this is a year old but I just had to post it on here because of how awful it is. “Charles J. Rosciam is a retired captain with the Navy Medical Services Corps – a combat veteran and Purple Heart recipient. He and 16 other retired armed forces medical personnel are attempting to convince the Department of Defense (DOD) to stop torturing and killing animals as part of its trauma training program. Each year, in the name of national security and good medicine, 8500 animals get stabbed, shot, burned and amputated. Over in the chemical casualty program, vervet monkeys get tormented with drugs whose effects have long since been banned on the field of battle. animal-testingCaptain Rosciam and his colleagues would like to see all that come to an end. In June, the group joined with the Physician’s Committee for Responsible Medicine (PCRM) to brief both the House and Senate on the issue. The DOD’s own animal regulations require that non-animal substitutes be used whenever possible. And, according to PCRM, every one of the military’s medical uses of animals could be replaced with equivalent or superior non-animal methods. Those methods range from human-patient simulators to rotations through civilian trauma centers. Here’s a little bit of irony: Amidst all the controversy and perseveration over detainee torture and whether such grotesqueries are legal and/or acceptable given the heinous crimes the prisoners are alleged to have committed, no one has stopped to consider why it is okay to do all that and worse to beings whose innocence is beyond dispute. Of course, in the larger scheme, innocence or guilt is irrelevant; Torture is wrong no matter to whom it happens. And that’s precisely the point here. When our former president said the United States does not torture, he lied. When our current president says it, he‘d like it to be true. Let’s hope he hears and heeds Captain Rosciam. You go, sir. Fight on.” added by: Chod77

Obama’s Gulf Spill Speech: "We Cannot Consign Our Children to this Future"

Photo via the New York Times Obama just wrapped his first address to the nation from the oval office, discussing the federal response to the BP Gulf spill and how the event relates to energy policy in general. The speech was pretty standard Obama — plenty of powerful rhetoric and sweeping appeals to look forward. What I was listening for, however, weren’t vague reassurances and calls to rally around clean energy. I was looking for any hints of the actual policy ideas the president intends to support to actually set those appeals into action. Here’s what I found: … Read the full story on TreeHugger

View original post here:
Obama’s Gulf Spill Speech: "We Cannot Consign Our Children to this Future"

Matthews Teases His Documentary About Scary and Violent Tea Party

If Chris Matthews’ preview, on Tuesday’s Hardball, of his MSNBC documentary Rise of the New Right, is an indicator of what his special will be like expect a lot of rehashing of Matthews’ various attacks on the Tea Party over the past year as he conflates them and the likes of Rush Limbaugh with the birther movement and ominously warns of their potential for violence. Matthews even warned his viewers that his special “will stun you” and that the “voices you’ll hear” and “the guns you see” will explain why “you’re seeing men at political rallies for the first time ever, wearing guns.” In a segment that featured conservative Pat Buchanan and leftist David Corn of Mother Jones, Matthews included the Limbaugh as a member of the “new right” that is “justifying violence.” CHRIS MATTHEWS: Pat these people are saying things about the country that just aren’t true. The President is not legitimate. That the, that the federal government is a tyranny. They are justifying violence. DAVID CORN, MOTHER JONES: Don’t forget secret FEMA camps! PAT BUCHANAN: Well look that’s, I think that’s preposterous. Look now, I’m sure you can go out there, you’ve got a country of 300 million and find people- MATTHEWS: Okay I’m talking about people like Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck, I’m not talking about strangers here. BUCHANAN: Alright but you’re taking, you take Joe McCarthy in 1954, four years into his crusade, 50 percent of the American people thought he was doing a good job. Twenty percent, what I’m saying is, take a look… MATTHEWS: That’s the point. I’m not denying the popularity of these people. That’s why we did the documentary. To say how scary it is. The following exchanges and final commentary from Matthews were aired on the June 15 edition of Hardball: CHRIS MATTHEWS: Pat you’re one of the stars of this not because you’re a current hero but because you were a pathfinder. What I find stunning about this, and I think liberals, progressives, people from the center left will be stunned and scared by what they see tomorrow night. People on the right may find themselves yelling “right on, right on!” because a lot of this documentary is people on the right saying their thing from Glenn Beck to Rush Limbaugh to Orly Taitz to all these people out there, Alex Jones, saying their thing. It’s a true documentary, as you know. What is it today that scares people about Washington government to the point where some are arming themselves? They’re calling it illegitimate. This government was elected legitimately. They’re calling it a tyranny. It’s not right/left anymore. It sounds revolutionary these people. All of them. Tea Party, militia, patriot groups, truths, birthers, the whole crowd. PAT BUCHANAN: Well, I think you’re mixing an awful lot of things. MATTHEWS: Well there’s because they use the same language. BUCHANAN: But look, look I don’t know the Michigan militia guys. I don’t go out with them into the woods and things like that. And I don’t know if these guys with guns and things like that, really represent our Tea Party. What you gotta ask, Chris, is how is it that a Tea Party that you described in a one-hour documentary as very dangerous and in some ways threatening, had a 2-1 approval record and the Tea Party was more admired and approving of than the Democratic Party and the Republican Party as of a couple of months ago. Where you’ve got it pretty close, I think Chris, is on the second part. I think the first part would be like me doing a documentary on the civil rights movement and starting off with Stokely Carmichael and H. Rapp Brown and you know Malcolm X and Elijah Muhammad and then you get around to Whitney Young and, and Martin Luther King. MATTHEWS: Yeah but Martin Luther King was never a black nationalist. He wasn’t calling for separation. Let me go to you, David. It seems like what strikes me in doing this, and reporting it is the use of the flag “Don’t Tread on Me.” The great Gadsden flag from South Carolina. These people are referring to the federal government of the United States which was honestly elected. Nobody questions the election of Barack Obama. He won with a good, what? 53, 54 percent. DAVID CORN, MOTHER JONES: Well some actually do. MATTHEWS: Well look they’re saying he’s not an American. They’re saying he’s illegitimate. CORN: Yeah. MATTHEWS: This language I’ve never heard before. CORN: What was interesting to me about, about the piece that you did was, that you show the continuum between people, Dick Armeys of the world, who you interview, who was a member of Congress, you know libertarian conservative. You know helping to stir up the Tea Party. And then you have someone like Alex Jones who you just saw in that clip. Radio talk show host who says he’s not right, says he’s not left. But he says that basically there is a planetary elite that literally has a secret plan to kill 80 to 99 percent of the population. And you have Rand Paul going on his radio show every couple of months, in which they talk about the threats to liberty. Now I’m not saying that Rand Paul believes the conspiracy theories of Alex Jones, but by appearing on that show he is somewhat legitimating- MATTHEWS: Right. CORN: -Alex Jones as a voice of the right. MATTHEWS: Why, look Dick Armey, we all like, I’ve known Dick Armey forever. Dick Armey will not disown the birthers. Now this is where I think you’re wrong Pat. Thirty-two percent of Republicans, self-identified Republicans are birthers now. They believe the President wasn’t born in the United States now. The latest CBS poll. So you can’t just say it’s a fringe crowd. BUCHANAN: Alright well let me talk as a political figure- MATTHEWS: I mean can you imagine a third of the Republicans you know believing this guy is not an American. It’s true. BUCHANAN: Well Chris there about one-third of African-Americans in this country think that George Bush was responsible for either blowing up or deliberately not doing anything- MATTHEWS: What poll was that? BUCHANAN: I saw it after New Orleans. Because they said, because it was black folks there. Now what do you do about that? Here’s what I do about birthers, I say, no. I think the Honolulu Advertiser. They didn’t huck that up. I think he was born in Hawaii. And they say, “Well we don’t think so.” I’d say, well who are you going to vote for? If the say, “Well we’re gonna vote for you I’d say thanks, fine.” But you- MATTHEWS: Even though you’re de-legitimizing the government and justifying a lot of talk here. BUCHANAN: I’m not legit-, Chris there are people out there in my movement, all over the place that got views- MATTHEWS: Okay. BUCHANAN: -that I don’t agree with. What are you gonna say? I don’t want your vote or I don’t want your vote? MATTHEWS: You don’t think it’s dangerous for people to believe this government is illegitimate? BUCHANAN: Mean in what sense? MATTHEWS: And believe it’s illegitimate. Meaning it was a usurped power taken from the people. Somehow this guy is not an American. Somehow he was elected- BUCHANAN: I understand the birthers but I don’t know anybody that doesn’t think this was a legitimate election. MATTHEWS: They say he shouldn’t have been on the ballot. CORN: This is a danger and we’ve talked about this on the show before. If you have people out there saying that Barack Obama has a, is a secret Muslim, as one of the people say on your documentary, or he has a secret plan to destroy America or that America will cease to exist if what he wants, if he wants goes through, it does send a green light, a signal to people: “Wait a second. This is about life and death.” This is… MATTHEWS: Okay let’s take a look, first of all Dick Armey. CORN: And then what do you do? People out there are gonna get the wrong message about taking extreme action. MATTHEWS: Okay. BUCHANAN: Well you know, like Lee Harvey Oswald. I mean take a look at these guys who have done all the shooting in the sixties. MATTHEWS: By the way the trouble is this rationalizes all kinds of behavior. Let’s take a look at this. This is the origins of the Tea Party voices you’ll hear right now. Let’s listen. (Clip from documentary) MATTHEWS: And then you have the head of the John Birch Society saying that Ike was a communist, his brother Milton was a communist. All communist discipline guys. Pat these people are saying things about the country that just aren’t true. The President is not legitimate. That the, that the federal government is a tyranny. They are justifying violence. CORN: Don’t forget secret FEMA camps! BUCHANAN: Well look that’s, I think that’s preposterous. Look now, I’m sure you can go out there, you’ve got a country of 300 million and find people- MATTHEWS: Okay I’m talking about people like Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck, I’m not talking about strangers here. BUCHANAN: Alright but you’re taking, you take Joe McCarthy in 1954, four years into his crusade, 50 percent of the American people thought he was doing a good job. Twenty percent, what I’m saying is, take a look… MATTHEWS: That’s the point. I’m not denying the popularity of these people. That’s why we did the documentary. To say how scary it is. … MATTHEWS: Let me finish tonight with our big documentary coming up here tomorrow night. The Rise of the New Right at 7pm Eastern tomorrow night will stun you with what’s happening with this country. You’ll never again believe this so-called Tea Party movement is just about taxes or deficits or Obamacare. No, what you’ll see is far more like the original Tea Party up in Boston, the one that previewed our war against the British. Look at the Gadsden flag they wield, that warning of “Don’t tread on me” with the coiled rattlesnake. In 1776 it served warning to those who threatened America from abroad. Today it’s being waved in contempt of our own honestly elected American government in Washington. Listen to Rush Limbaugh stir on the new right by calling the government in Washington “a regime” or Orly Taitz, leader of the birthers, calling the President illegitimate. Listen to militiamen on guard against tyranny here on the Potomac and you get the full force of what’s happening. This isn’t about what the tax rate should be. It’s an argument about whether the federal government deserves toppling like any other tyranny or illegitimate regime in history. It’s not the talk of politics, but of revolution. Listen to Limbaugh, Beck and Palin and Michele Bachmann, Orly Taitz and yes Rand Paul and you hear of a Washington that has usurped authority, of a president who is not one of us, of a Congress that needs to be investigated for treason. Of a country itself that’s been taken over and needs to be taken back. The voices you’ll hear speak for themselves. The guns you see, the semi-automatic weapons of the arms of those who see the government of the United States as the looming tower of tyranny. If I can put it as bluntly as possible, catch The Rise of the New Right here tomorrow night at 7:00pm and you’ll suddenly get why you’re seeing men at political rallies for the first time ever, wearing guns.

See the original post here:
Matthews Teases His Documentary About Scary and Violent Tea Party

Voices From the Spill: Gulf Coast Fishing Wiped Out For Decades (Video)

By this point, nearly two months since the start of the BP oil spill, you’ve probably seen a lot of video interviews with people from the Gulf Coast telling you how the disaster has r… Read the full story on TreeHugger

Link:
Voices From the Spill: Gulf Coast Fishing Wiped Out For Decades (Video)

Each Year, 75,000 Homes Waste As Much Energy As Contained in Entire BP Gulf Spill

Image via Energy Savvy Despite the fact that the BP Gulf spill continues, with no clear end in sight, many have already concerned themselves with the task of putting the event into the perspective of US energy consumption in general. Case in point: this graphic, which points out that the energy wasted by 75,000 homes a year equals the energy contained in the biggest oil spill in US history. … Read the full story on TreeHugger

Read more:
Each Year, 75,000 Homes Waste As Much Energy As Contained in Entire BP Gulf Spill

CNBC’s Insana Rips Ron Paul: He ‘Doesn’t Even Have a Basic Understanding of Fundamental Economics’

This one was one that you just couldn’t let go – that libertarian champion and former Republican presidential candidate Rep. Ron Paul, Texas, doesn’t have a basic understanding of economics. That was the claim made by CNBC senior analyst and commentator Ron Insana on the June 14 broadcast of “Closing Bell.” At issue was a June 14 Washington Post article by Robert O’Hara and Dan Keating that suggested there was a conflict of interest in Paul’s investments and his policy stances, as in he is a proponent of the gold standard and other uses for the precious medal. ” Rep. Ron Paul is captivated by gold,” O’Hara and Keating wrote. “Over the past two decades, he has written books about the virtues of gold-backed currency. He has made uncounted speeches about the precious metal. He even took a leadership post on the House subcommittee that oversees the nation’s monetary policy, mints and gold medals.” O’Hara and Keating detailed just how extensive Paul’s investments are – valued at $1.7 million. “But his focus on gold goes beyond the theoretical,” they wrote. “In recent years, Paul (R-Tex.) has poured hundreds of thousands of his own dollars into stocks of some of the world’s largest gold-mining operations, according to a review of his financial disclosure forms by The Washington Post. In 2008, while advocating for the United States to reinstate a gold standard, he reported owning up to $1.5 million in shares of at least nine gold-production companies. In addition, he disclosed up to $200,000 in silver stocks. In all, those holdings represented close to half of his assets.” But according to Insana, who has had an on-again-off-again career at CNBC after a failed attempt to try his hand at running a hedge fund , took a shot at Paul’s investment strategy, claiming the Texas congressman was some sort of investing simpleton. “Listen, the Ron Paul stuff, you know, if it weren’t part of a conflict story would be funny because Ron Paul is one of the many elected representatives who we have that doesn’t even have a basic understanding of fundamental economics, let alone more complex issues and better ways to hedge against inflation than buying gold,” Insana said. “Gold is a complex instrument. You know, it speaks to a bigger point. He doesn’t even know what he’s doing.” As unsophisticated as Insana’s claim that Paul’s investment in gold is, assuming Paul had held this commodity going back to late 2008, he would be up over 50 percent with his investment, while the S&P 500 is down nearly 13 percent in the same time period.

Read the rest here:
CNBC’s Insana Rips Ron Paul: He ‘Doesn’t Even Have a Basic Understanding of Fundamental Economics’

Arianna Huffington Comes Out in Favor of Flat Tax — for Greece

Sometimes even the seemingly most unreasonable characters as far public policy goes can be reasoned with if the circumstances are right. Just sometimes it takes someone like Steve Forbes to pull it off. On the June 14 broadcast of MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” Forbes explained that a flat tax might be the medicine that Greece, a country on the fiscal brink needs. “Well, when you engage in binge spending and the idea that going to revive an economy, you just get in a spiral on that,” Forbes explained. “In terms of countries like Greece what should be done, in addition to the necessary austerity, is they haven’t put in place policies, Joe that we did in the early ’80s that enabled this  country to get back on its feet. Forbes alluded to the bounce back Russia had after its economic struggles coming out of the collapse of the Soviet Union.  “For example, one thing Russia did right 10 years ago was put in a flat tax,” Forbes said. “Within two years, collections doubled because you make it, you pay it. Most central and eastern European countries have done the same thing with the tax codes. Do it to Greece. Greece makes it very hard to set up a legitimate business. Remove those barriers. Unleash their entrepreneurs. So, in addition to the belt tightening put in things that enable these countries to get back to their feet as well.” “Morning Joe” co-host Joe Scarborough expressed concern that belt-tightening measures may inhibit an economic recovery. But that isn’t the case according to Forbes, if the recipe is right. “No, if you combine it with these other pro-growth measures,” Forbes said. “For example, we have enormous tax increases coming in this country. Don’t do it. In Western Europe, reduce those onerous tax rates, labor practices that get in the way. One of the good things the Irish did – Ireland was hit hard by this recession. They faced up to it over a year ago. Didn’t wait for, like Greece to hit the wall. One of the things they didn’t do was raise their business tax. They have the lowest in Europe. The Europeans are always beating up on them – raise it, raise it. They kept it at 12.5 [percent]. Ireland is going to come out of this faster than other countries.” Huffington Post editor Arianna Huffington, also a guest on “Morning Joe,” said she’d be in favor of a Forbes-style flat tax, in Greece that is assuming it got Greek citizens paying their fair share of taxes. “Well, there’s something to be said for the flat tax in Greece because nobody has been paying their fair share of taxes in Greece,” Huffington said. “So if the flat tax can get Greeks to pay their fair share that might be worth it.” However, Huffington explained that she thought the real problem wasn’t tax rates, but high unemployment, similar to what the United States is facing. “But to prevent what happened to Greece from what happened in America, surely Steve, you must agree that the kind of unemployment we are facing right now – 26 million people out of work, either no job at all or under-employed or too discouraged to look for work – is not sustainable,” she continued. “I mean the kind of fear and anxiety that is seen around the country is leading to violence in many areas. So, how do we deal with that when retail spending is down? When consumer spending is down? Doesn’t the government have a role here?” But rather than government being pro-active, as Huffington suggested, government should get out of the way to allow for business to expand Forbes explained. “Well, the government has a role to provide an environment that makes it possible for a business to grow and hire,” Forbes replied. “For example, this new tax bill that the Senate may pass is going to be very, very onerous on small businesses. Stop it. Stabilize the dollar so you get small business lending again. So you create the environment and entrepreneurs will step in. But right now everybody is on the side with uncertainty. We saw it in the jobs report where businesses extended the workweek instead of hiring new people because of uncertainty. So if the government provides the right environment, this thing will snap back.”

More here:
Arianna Huffington Comes Out in Favor of Flat Tax — for Greece