Tag Archives: usa

Awesome! Bodysuit Makes You Feel Like 75

Alright who wants to be old? None, well what if you can actually be what you are but get a feel for being old? Now we see some hands up! Researchers at Massachusetts … http://bit.ly/cO77Nx added by: itgrunts

What healthy products could use a makeover?

USA Today reports on carrots being rebranded as junk food. Will this strategy get more people excited about vegetables? What other healthy products could use a makeover? added by: joshuaheller

Watch Burn Notice Season 4 Episode 12 – Guilty As Charged

Watch Burn Notice S4E12: Guilty As Charged The latest installment of Burn Notice which is entitled “Guilty As Charged” is the hit spy TV series’ 12th episode of the 4th season that aired last 08/26/2010 Thursday at 9:00 PM on USA. Michael and the team’s new client is the defense attorney whose daughter has been kidnapped and it’s their job now to find the girl and bring her back to her father. Watch Burn Notice 4×12(04012) Free Online Streaming Full HDTV Episodes Replay of the Latest Season and Video Clip Download Link:

View post:
Watch Burn Notice Season 4 Episode 12 – Guilty As Charged

Updated US Federal Trade Commission Guideline May Nullify 100’s of Existing Green Labels, Product Claims

Way too many green labels . Image credit: Google image search excerpt. The US FTC is close to updating its original “green guides” which have been the sole legal basis for examining and challenging the validity of various green marketing claims or product “green marks” There is an obvious need for this update, as more green product claims and labels have popped up every year since TreeHugger.com was founded (see links below the fold), many of which are of questionable … Read the full story on TreeHugger

See original here:
Updated US Federal Trade Commission Guideline May Nullify 100’s of Existing Green Labels, Product Claims

Watch Psych Season 5 Episode 7 – Ferry Tale

Watch Psych S5E7: Ferry Tale Gus and Shawn goes helping out a prison guard get a hold of some inmates who has escaped and have gotten into a ferryboat going to the Channel Islands. The latest installment of Psych which is entitled “Ferry Tale” is the

America Is Not Getting Any Sleep [Trendwatch]

Couples cannot figure out how to sleep together. Teens are too wired to slumber. And celebrities think they’re so special they don’t even need to sleep. Does this sleep crisis threaten to destroy America? You could say that, yes. More

Media Nearly Silent as ObamaCare Proponents Drop Deficit, Cost Savings Claims

It has now been five days since Politico’s Ben Smith published a powerpoint presentation created by an amalgamation of powerful left wing interest groups, conceding that two of the central arguments for passing ObamaCare – that it will lower the deficit and will reduce health care costs – have failed. For a group of organizations integral to the passage of the law, that was a stunning admission. And yet, the mainstream press is nearly silent on the issue. Searches on Nexis and Google News reveal no coverage from the major television networks, the cable news channels (with the exception of Fox), the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, USA Today, NPR, PBS, or Newsweek. To their credit, Time Magazine and the Washington Post published a blog post each on the revelation. Even while discussing ObamaCare and its potential effects on the deficit and health care costs, some media outlets managed to avoid any mention of a fact Democrats now seem to be conceding: “the White House’s first and most aggressive sales pitch have essentially failed,” as Smith notes. The powerpoint, created by an umbrella organization called the Herndon Alliance – which includes left-wing power brokers such as the SEIU, MoveOn, La Raza, and the Center for American Progress – specifically instructs those still trying to sell ObamaCare to the American public to avoid claiming “the law will reduce costs and deficits.” Of course those paying attention already knew that. Even the White House’s own Medicare Actuary has acknowledged that ObamaCare will increase, not reduce, the amount the nation spends on health care over the law’s first 10 years. Optimistic projections beyond the 10 year window “may be unrealistic,” the Actuary stated ( pdf ). Not only will the bill raise the amount the nation as a whole spends on health care, it will also raise individual Americans’ insurance premiums, according to the Congressional Budget Office . Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin concurred with that assessment . Neither will the law reduce the federal deficit. Once one strips away all of the accounting tricks and budgetary gimmicks, one finds, in the words of the New York Times’s Douglas Holtz-Eakin, “The health care reform legislation would raise, not lower, federal deficits, by $562 billion.” So the liberal organization’s admission that controlling costs and trimming the deficits are rhetorical dead ends when it comes to selling ObamaCare is hardly a surprise. To say otherwise would contradict the facts, and Americans are not stupid. The group also recommended that ObamaCare’s remaining proponents stop trying to sell the law as an undeniable success. Instead, the presentation suggests they tell skeptical voters that “The law is not perfect, but it does good things and helps many people. Now we’ll work to improve it.” (Emphasis in the original.) Byron York explains the significance of Herdon’s recommendations: It’s a stunning about-face for a party that saw national health care as its signature accomplishment. “This is the first time we’ve seen from Democrats that they clearly understand they have a serious problem in terms of selling this legislation,” says Republican pollster David Winston. The reluctance to defend Obamacare as a cost-cutter and deficit-reducer is particularly telling. Wasn’t that the No. 1 reason for passing the bill in the first place? “This legislation will … lower costs for families and for businesses and for the federal government, reducing our deficit by over $1 trillion in the next two decades,” President Obama said when he signed the bill into law on March 23. Now, Democrats are throwing that argument out the window… The story might be even worse than that for Democrats. Everyone knows the public’s top issue is the economy. It has been since before Obama took office. So when the president and Democratic congressional leadership devoted a year to passing national health care, Republicans charged they were ignoring the public’s wishes. Now, when Democrats admit that Obamacare won’t cut costs or reduce deficits, they open themselves up to a more serious charge: they spent a year working on something that will actually cost jobs and make things worse. The liberal interest group coalition’s recommendations speak volumes about the political and policy failures of the administration and the Democratic Party’s congressional leadership. And yet virtually all major media players are silent on the admission. Democrats are making a key shift in strategy in their efforts to sell ObamaCare to a skeptical public, but if you get your news from most of the nation’s major news outlets, you are most likely unaware of that fact, or its implications for the policy.

Here is the original post:
Media Nearly Silent as ObamaCare Proponents Drop Deficit, Cost Savings Claims

Loblaws’ Grown Close to Home Foods…Aren’t

Images by B. Alter: Would you rather shop here… Way back in 2007, TreeHugger Lloyd went to Loblaws, Canada’s largest supermarket chain, looking for fresh local food in July and he found: cherries. It’s three years later and things have changed–sort of. Now they have a little booth at the front of the store called “Grown Close to Home” and they are selling Ontario peaches and potatoes and cucumbers. But right behind it they have their cherries from the USA and pineapple from Costa Rica. That’s a rather broad definition of local. We aren’t the only ones noticing this… Read the full story on TreeHugger

See original here:
Loblaws’ Grown Close to Home Foods…Aren’t

Novice Versus Nature: Digital Technology Can Worsen The Odds Of Survival

SPOT emergency personal communicator device, with “SOS” button. Image credit: Amazon ad . Many younger Americans, devoid of such early life experiences as one would get from Boy Scouting or hunting, emboldened by a proliferation of cheap GPS devices, and perhaps encouraged by the recent outpouring of ‘survival shows’ are doing the dumb dance into the wild. The results can be at both public and personal expense.

Follow this link:
Novice Versus Nature: Digital Technology Can Worsen The Odds Of Survival

Valerie Plame ‘Fair Game’ Movie Tosses Name Leaker Richard Armitage Down Memory Hole

The only way we even know the name of Valerie Plame (and fame seeking hubby Joe Wilson) is that that former Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage leaked her name as a CIA officer to columnist Robert Novak. That is what set in motion the long drawn out Plamegate affair in which only Scooter Libby was convicted of something other than leaking her name. So you would figure that the supposedly biographical movie scheduled for a November USA release about Plame, Fair Game , would feature Armitage front and center as the principal villain. Right? Wrong. The fact is that “Fair Game” has tossed Richard Armitage down the memory hole. The man who is responsible for the reason that any of us even know who Valerie Plame is appears nowhere in the extensive IMDB cast credits for this movie. Of course, the aforementioned Scooter Libby (David Andrews) who did not leak her name is listed. Also listed in the cast is the Armitage-leaked name of Valerie Plame (Naomi Watts), fame seeking hubby Joe Wilson (Sean Penn), Nervous Analyst #1 (Louis Ozawa Changchien), Chauvinist Analyst (Sean Mahon),  Head Paparazzo (Harry L. Seddon), Four Seasons Waitress (Satu Rautaharju), Starbucks Employee (Angela Lewis), and Turkish Embassy Guest (Marsall Factora). However, as for the person who made the “Fair Game” movie possible by leaking Valerie Plame’s name, he appears nowhere in the cast credits. Ironically you can learn more about the real facts of the Plame case (and who leaked Plame’s name) by reading the IMDB “Fair Game” message board than by seeing the movie itself. Some sample posts that delivers the information that the “Fair Game” propanda movie refuses to touch: …The film conveniently leaves out the fact that we know who leaked her name and that character isn’t even in the film… Funny how neither Novak nor Armitage are in the film then, right? Libby didn’t leak Plame’s name. Armitage (a Bush critic and enemy) “leaked” it and only after he was specifically asked by Novak why on earth James Wilson was sent to Niger in the first place. Novak then called the CIA to make sure it was ok to publish her name, and they gave him what he considered the green light. The CIA made absolutely no effort to convince him he shouldn’t print the name, so he printed it. That’s how real journalists in a free state operate. If the CIA wanted the name kept secret, they could have easily done so. Novak himself has kept names out of articles many times over the years for exactly such reasons. The CIA made no efforts, most likely because Plame wasn’t all that “undercover” and they genuinely didn’t have any valid reasons to convince Novak not to use her name, so they didn’t bother.  Wilson was hired by the CIA to investigate claims about yellow cake in Niger. He later wrote an op-ed piece attacking the Bush administration using his experience investigating in Niger as source of authority. It became a big news story. At that point, the smarter journalists started wondering who this Wilson guy was, and did some background checking on him. This background check left them puzzled, because their was nothing in Wilson’s resume which would even remotely recommend him being sent on such a mission. So Washington DC based reporter Robert Novak called around trying to find out why Wilson got sent. Eventually, George W. Bush enemy and Colin Powell lap boy Richard Armitage told Novak that Wilson’s wife works at the CIA and she’s the one who pushed him for the job. I am amazed how Hollywood is willing to lose hundreds of millions, if not billions, to sell their leftist progapanda. At some point this will be self-limiting, when they run out of money or studio stockholders tire of losing money.  The final poster above has a point. “Fair Game” is doomed to become another leftwing proganda flick flop that will follow in the wake of many other such box office bombs. However, it is not too late for the producers of “Fair Game” to salvage this movie. Your humble correspondent recommends that they do some creative editing to remake this movie as a comedy. Keep all the original scenes but edit in one of my favorite actors, Bruce McGill (who also portrays the CIA Deputy Director for Operations Jim Pavitt), with a shaved head and a lot of jacket padding to play the part of a phantom Richard Armitage who nobody in the movie even notices. As the boring melodramatic “action” in the movie takes place, McGill as Armitage  appears in many of the scenes yelling things like, “HEY VALERIE! Nobody would even know you if I hadn’t leaked your name! Why don’t you or anybody else here even acknowledge my existence?” Not only would such a movie be more accurate but it would draw much more box office sales than the doomed-to-fail original.

Read the original here:
Valerie Plame ‘Fair Game’ Movie Tosses Name Leaker Richard Armitage Down Memory Hole