Tag Archives: warren-buffett

full harvest moon 2010

A hawk perched on a tree at the edge of Randleman Lake is framed by the harvest moon, near Branson Davis Road in Randolph County, N.C., on Wednesday, Sept. 22, 2010. A large, full moon will herald in the fall as it graces the skies on the autumnal equinox for the first time in nearly 20 years. Today is the last day of summer, and as the sun sinks into the western horizon, the Harvest Moon will rise in the east, creating a 360-degree, summer-autumn twilight that is rarely seen, said Tony Phill

Read more:
full harvest moon 2010

Rupert Murdoch’s New York Post Twisting Words of Julian Assange’s Son Daniel Assange

Looks like producers for Dr. Phil and Montel might be waiting awhile if they think they have a celebrity dad-hating story in the making. Rupert Murdoch’s New York Post seemed to have obtained a scoop yesterday rising to the level of Dr. Evil/Scott Evil proportions, excerpting a FaceBook quote from Daniel Assange, 20, that appeared on its face to fuel the growing personal attacks against his father, embattled WikiLeaks founder and director, Julian Assange: WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange’s own son thinks he’s a nightmare when it comes to women. “That man does have a way of making a lot of female enemies,” Daniel Assange, 21, said about his embattled dad. Daniel made the Facebook posting after two Swedish women came forward with allegations that led to rape and molestation charges against his dad. Daniel also wondered about his father’s claim that the accusations were part of a Pentagon “smear campaign.” “Interesting to see whether this is the result of a government plot or personal grudges,” he wrote. But later on Friday, Daniel, under the moniker Somnidea on a website called The Sleepy Lammata lashed out at the newspaper, calling the story “godawful sensational tripe”: I’d just like to note here that the comments in question were very tongue-in-cheek and never intended to be made public like this, much less support the conclusions of the article. The NYP did not interview me or otherwise attain my consent in any way for their publication. I have much respect for my father and his cause, and these ridiculously ill-handled allegations of sexual abuse serve only to distract from the audacious awesomeness that he has actually done. added by: toyotabedzrock

The Billionaires Bankrolling the Tea Party

There’s just one element missing from these snapshots of America’s ostensibly spontaneous and leaderless populist uprising: the sugar daddies who are bankrolling it, and have been doing so since well before the “death panel” warm-up acts of last summer. Three heavy hitters rule. You’ve heard of one of them, Rupert Murdoch. The other two, the brothers David and Charles Koch, are even richer, with a combined wealth exceeded only by that of Bill Gates and Warren Buffett among Americans. But even those carrying the Kochs’ banner may not know who these brothers are. Their self-interested and at times radical agendas, like Murdoch’s, go well beyond, and sometimes counter to, the interests of those who serve as spear carriers in the political pageants hawked on Fox News. The country will be in for quite a ride should these potentates gain power, and given the recession-battered electorate’s unchecked anger and the Obama White House’s unfocused political strategy, they might. All three tycoons are the latest incarnation of what the historian Kim Phillips-Fein labeled “Invisible Hands” in her prescient 2009 book of that title: those corporate players who have financed the far right ever since the du Pont brothers spawned the American Liberty League in 1934 to bring down F.D.R. You can draw a straight line from the Liberty League’s crusade against the New Deal “socialism” of Social Security, the Securities and Exchange Commission and child labor laws to the John Birch Society-Barry Goldwater assault on J.F.K. and Medicare to the Koch-Murdoch-backed juggernaut against our “socialist” president. added by: Conniepae

40 billionaires pledge to give away half of wealth

More than three dozen of America's wealthiest individuals and families have joined Bill Gates and Warren Buffett in agreeing to give away at least half their fortunes to charity. The announcement was made Wednesday by The Giving Pledge, an effort officially launched by Gates and Buffett earlier this year to persuade the richest people in America to commit to giving the majority of their wealth to the philanthropic causes and charitable organizations of their choice, either during their lifetime or after their death. In addition to Buffett and Gates — America's two wealthiest individuals, with a combined net worth of $90 billion, according to Forbes — 38 other billionaires are taking the give-it-away pledge. They include New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, entertainment executive Barry Diller, Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison, energy tycoon T. Boone Pickens, media mogul Ted Turner, David Rockefeller, film director George Lucas and investor Ronald Perelman. “We’ve really just started, but already we’ve had a terrific response,” Buffett, co-founder and chairman and CEO of Berkshire Hathaway, said in a statement. “At its core, the Giving Pledge is about asking wealthy families to have important conversations about their wealth and how it will be used. “We’re delighted that so many people are doing just that – and that so many have decided to not only take this pledge but also to commit to sums far greater than the 50 percent minimum level.” added by: jennyschu

How to Properly Reward Your Favorite Starving Writer [The Rich]

The rich : they’re different from you and me. You read a story you like, you send a letter to the editor. A rich guy reads a story he likes and sends a $20,000 check to the writer. Atul Gawande wrote a New Yorker story about health care last year. Warren Buffett’s partner liked it so much that he decided to express himself the only way he knew how. As Buffett tells it : “My partner Charlie Munger sat down and wrote out a check for $20,000 to him and he’s never met him, never had any correspondence with it, he just mailed it to the New Yorker and he said, `This article is so useful socially.’ He says, `Just give this as a gift to the—to Dr. Gawande.'” Uhh. And then Atul Gawande had to be like hey, whoa, I gave it to charity, okay? Which just goes to show Charlie Munger’s fundamental mistake: not mailing a huge check to some dude whose story he liked, but mailing a huge check to a dude whose story he liked who couldn’t accept the money . We’d like to assure Mr. Munger and his fellow wealthiest 1% of 1% of Americans that internet “blogs” are a much richer source of writers who will be only to happy to silently pocket a check of praise, particularly if that check is mailed not to their place of work but straight to their home address, which could theoretically be obtained by emailing the writer directly. As a side note, I too have been thinking a lot lately about health care and other important problems facing America, as well as the insidious harm caused by capital gains taxes, and the best way to ensure that household help doesn’t steal from a summer home unoccupied by its busy, industrious owner. It’s hard to get all these ideas full fleshed out on a meager “blog” salary, though. Ah well. The loss is the world’s, is it not? Sure .

Read the original here:
How to Properly Reward Your Favorite Starving Writer [The Rich]