Tag Archives: Abortion

July New Home Sales: Wire Reports Dour, But Still Understated; Reuters-Quoted Economist Blames Govt.

July’s bad news in new home sales is even worse than it first appears. The seasonally adjusted annual rate of 276,000 units is bad enough. That is an all-time low since records have been kept and 12% lower than June’s annual rate. It’s also lower than what analysts predicted by about the same percentage. The lazy business press is running with those figures. But, as has been the case so many other times, it takes a trip to the raw (i.e., not seasonally adjusted) data, this time at the Census Bureau ( large PDF ), to fully comprehend the extent of the new-home market’s collapse during this big, fat failed “Recovery Summer.” The raw data shows that 25,000 new homes were sold in the U.S. in July. That’s not a typo, and it really is the figure for the entire country. Worse, that figure, the lowest July since records have been kept, is down by over one-third from July of last year, when the economy supposedly bottomed out, and by 42% from July 2008. I don’t think you’ll see those facts reported today. Here is a graphic cap of a 10:07 a.m. report at Reuters carried at CNBC.com . It contains a jaw-dropper of a quote from an economist (red box is obviously mine): You have to wonder how widely reported Mr. Porcelli’s in-your-face to the government will be, or if it will even survive future Reuters revisions. As would be expected, no similar quote is present at the Associated Press, which used its time-honored business-reporting strategy of downplaying the awful news inside of two larger stories, one about the stock market’s reaction and the other about the not as bad news about durable goods orders, instead of giving it the separate treatment it deserves. Here are a few paragraphs from the two reports. To their credit, the authors of the first cited the lowest-on-record nature of the past three months’ results, but without indicating the degree of the cratering: (Daniel Wagner and Alan Zibel, “Recovery in danger as firms, homebuyers cut back,” as of 12:09 p.m. ) The economic recovery appears to be stalling as companies cut back last month on their investments in equipment and machines and Americans bought new homes at the weakest pace in decades. … Separately, Commerce said new home sales fell 12.4 percent in July from a month earlier to a seasonally adjusted annual sales pace of 276,600. That was the slowest pace on records dating back to 1963. Collectively, the past three months have been the worst on record for new home sales. … The two reports are likely to stoke fears that the economy is on the verge of slipping back into a recession. They follow Tuesday’s report that showed sales of previously owned homes fell last month to the lowest level in decades. Unemployment remains near double digits and job growth in the private sector is slowing. … Housing has never fully recovered from the recession. Builders have been forced to compete with foreclosed properties offered at significantly lower prices. (Stephen Bernard, “More bad news on home sales sends stocks lower,” as of 12:04 p.m. ) The Dow Jones industrial average fell about 16 points in midday trading Wednesday following news that sales of new homes fell last month to the lowest level on record. It was the latest indication that home sales are stagnating after the expiration of a homebuyer tax credit this spring. … New home sales fell 12.4 percent in July to an annual rate of 276,600, the Commerce Department reported. That was the slowest pace on records dating back to 1963 and worse than the pace forecast by economists polled by Thomson Reuters. A day earlier, the National Association of Realtors said sales of existing homes, a far greater proportion of the housing market, fell to a 15-year low in July. … Despite the ultra-low borrowing rates, home sales have been weak since a home buyer tax credit expired at the end of April. High unemployment has kept people from buying homes, and banks still reeling from the crisis in the mortgage-backed securities market have been cautious in making new loans. Note how the last excerpted sentence dodges Porcelli’s contention at Reuters that “There is also little demand for lending.” Banks are being cautious, but there’s plenty of mortgage money out there for people who want to borrow (listen to the constant barrage of lender radio ads if you don’t believe it). There’s just little interest in doing so. Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com .

See the original post here:
July New Home Sales: Wire Reports Dour, But Still Understated; Reuters-Quoted Economist Blames Govt.

CBS, NBC Mourn Loss of Funding for Embryonic Stem Cell Research

A  recent court ruling  found that federal funding for embryonic stem cell research violates laws prohibiting the government from using taxpayer money for research that destroys an embryo. The ruling has sent the evening network news broadcasts reeling. While ABC’s “World News” briefly reported on the ruling Aug. 23, the NBC “Nightly News” and CBS “Evening News” have both aired reports suggesting that the ruling would end life-saving research – in spite of the fact the embryonic research can continue if privately funded, and federal funding of adult stem cell research is unaffected. NBC’s Robert Bazell reported Aug. 24 that the ruling “left a lot of researchers fairly stunned.” CBS’s Wyatt Andrews called the ruling “a shock.” But was it really? Neither report mentioned that federal funding for embryonic stem cell research was  severely restricted  under the Bush administration, and was only widened by the Obama administration  in July 2009 . Both reports also suggested that the ruling would end life-saving research. Bazell featured Dr. Chuck Murray, who is “in the delicate business of rebuilding severely damaged hearts and has tried adult and embryonic stem cells in his efforts.” The segment featured heart muscle built from embryonic stem cells, and Bazell warned that “because of yesterday’s court ruling, this research might have to stop by the end of the year.” But he didn’t mention that the rest of Dr. Murray’s research – on adult stem cells – is unaffected by the ruling. On CBS, Andrews warned the ruling “could halt a half-million dollar research project both the University of Maryland and Johns Hopkins have been using to study childhood leukemia” and another studying Down syndrome. But later in the report he noted that the National Institutes of Health has said that “more than 200 existing stem cell experiments could continue for now but may not be renewed.” Andrews did note adult stem cell research is unaffected by the ruling. While both reports suggested the ruling would mean the end of promising research, they both alluded to the fact that the research will, in fact, continue – just not with taxpayer money. Private funding of embryonic stem cell research is not affected by the ruling. Both reports also included brief input from pro-life advocates and medical ethicists who praised the decision. Like this article? Sign up for “Culture Links,” CMI’s weekly e-mail newsletter, by   clicking  here.

Read more:
CBS, NBC Mourn Loss of Funding for Embryonic Stem Cell Research

Video: Jimmy Kimmel’s Rent-A-Cops Pose as Active Duty While Film Crew Burns Pro-Life Protester with Spotlight

Read backstories here , and Survivors of the Abortion Holocaust would soon upload video of retired and off-duty rent-a-cops posing as on-duty cops at the Jimmy Kimmel stunt shoot, when cameramen turned their spotlights on a teen pro-life protester. Following are a couple. In this 1st video Troy Newman of

Continue reading here:
Video: Jimmy Kimmel’s Rent-A-Cops Pose as Active Duty While Film Crew Burns Pro-Life Protester with Spotlight

Media Applaud Teen Abortion on ‘Friday Night Lights’

NBC’s “Friday Night Lights” wants to tackle more than football players. In a bold move for scripted dramas, which usually shy away from taboo issues, the July 9 episode of the network drama featured a high school-aged character deciding to have an abortion, declaring it was “the right thing to do.” The plotline earned praise from many in the media. Entertainment Weekly’s Ken Tucker praised “Friday Night Lights” for delivering “one of its finest hours ever.” In a July 10 blog post , The Atlantic’s Tony Lee noted that he was impressed by the “nuanced, apolitical manner” that the writers used to convey the dilemma facing this pregnant teenage girl. Lee described the episode as “devoid of political posturing or grandstanding,” ignoring the fact that the writers’ decision to include a pro-choice decision is itself a political statement. While the characters did not deal lightly with the issue, the show’s justification for the abortion relied on several common pro-choice arguments, including economics and self-interest. The pregnant student, Becky Sproles, worried she wouldn’t be able to care for a baby. Her confidant, high school principal Tami Taylor, advised Sproles that she would tell her own daughter to “think about her life, think about what’s important to her and what she wants.” That position earned support from Slate . Writer Emily Bazelon said Taylor’s advice for Sproles to “think about her life” was “the perfect thing” to say in that situation.  New York Times writer Ginia Bellafante called the storyline “remarkable,” noting the rarity of abortions on television shows since the 1970s. Bellafante said that unlike more recent shows that presented both arguments in the abortion debate fairly, “Friday Night Lights” chose instead to hold to its “quasi-Marxist understanding that economics dictate everything.” The episode did include mentions of alternatives to abortion, including crisis pregnancy centers and adoption agencies. But Bellafante acknowledged that the “opposing view,” that is, the pro-life view, “was depicted as obtuse and out of touch.” 

View post:
Media Applaud Teen Abortion on ‘Friday Night Lights’

Pro-Lifers to Sue Jimmy Kimmel

Read backstories here . Click photo to enlarge. My

Read more:
Pro-Lifers to Sue Jimmy Kimmel

Comedian Makes Courtney Love Abortion Jokes

This week comedian Ragan Fox ventured into the abortion-for-laughs arena. Fox is a “gay poet and performance artist,” according to WiredUpdate.com described Fox’s most recent podcast ( Warning: PG-13 ): Today we are going to highlight even more disturbing “jokes” that Ragan has written and performed within the same podcast…. Ragan begins by saying he adores singer/songwriter Courtney Love and he’s excited for the release of her new album. He then takes the conversation to a dark place while joking about abortions and battered women. In the clip Ragan says he can imagine Courtney performing an “inappropriate song about feminism” that involves performing a live abortion on stage…. He goes on, “‘Nobody’s Daughter’ (Courtney’s album title) is a reference to every abortion she has had. Let’s call a spade a space, Courtney Love has got to be the MacGyver of abortion.” Ragan then begins speaking in a drunken high pitch voice which is supposed to be his Courtney Love impersonation. As Courtney, Ragan says, “I give myself an abortion with pills, my pill abortion. I throw myself down the stairs, stair abortion. I douche with Clorox on a Sunday morning after a long Saturday night. Sometimes when I’m partying I’ll drink a Red Bull and Vodka abortion and like a trampoline abortion.” “One time I was going to shoot myself in the p***** (gunshot sound effect). I thought up of this abortion when I was married to Curt [sic] ( Cobain ) and I accidently shot him in the head. But I had to tell everybody he shot himself in the head. Who wants to hear my new song?” You can hear the unedited clip at Chris Rock bit in 2005, which I actually thought was good, despite the raunchiness, because it contained truth. Then came not-so-funny The Family Guy (graphic right) in 2009. But all abortion humor has value, according to pro-abort Sarah Seltzer at

See the article here:
Comedian Makes Courtney Love Abortion Jokes

Pro-Life Activists Disrupt Jimmy Kimmel Show Taping

Read backstory Huffington Post and Survivors of the Abortion Holocaust staging a protest in front of comedian Jimmy Kimmel’s home yesterday morning. They followed that with a protest at Kimmel’s studio on Hollywood Blvd in LA yesterday afternoon. I should mention the Survivors have been holding their annual

Excerpt from:
Pro-Life Activists Disrupt Jimmy Kimmel Show Taping

Media Ignore Planned Parenthood’s $1.3 Billion Federal Funding Discrepancy

If $1.3 billion is unaccounted for and the media don’t report it, did it really happen? According to an  American Life League review  of Planned Parenthood’s annual reports, the organization received more than $2 billion in federal grants and contracts between 2002 and 2008. A June 16 Government Accountability Report, however, found that the organization spent just $657.1 million of taxpayer money in the same time period. The $1.3 billion discrepancy failed to catch the attention of the nation’s major media outlets. None of the networks (ABC, CBS and NBC) or major newspapers (Los Angeles times, The New York Times, USA Today and The Washington Post) reported it. A Culture and Media Institute review of coverage found that only one newspaper listed among Nexis’ “major newspapers” – The Houston Chronicle – even mentioned the GAO report. The Chronicle’s June 16 article noted that Planned Parenthood spent $657 million of federal money over seven years, but did not mention the income/outlay discrepancy. Don’t Follow the Money The media have made Planned Parenthood a go-to source for several stories over the last six months, including debate over abortion language in health care reform legislation, the trial of the activist who killed abortionist Dr. George Tiller, and the 50 th  anniversary of the Pill. From Dec. 28, 2009, to June 28, 2010, the broadcast networks and the “Big 4” newspapers mentioned Planned Parenthood 56 times in news stories. None of those stories mentioned the GAO report, and only one article reported the amount of federal money going to Planned Parenthood. The February 27 article in The New York Times mentioned an investigative operation by pro-life activist Lila Rose which found Planned Parenthood clinics willing to accept donations from people who wanted African American babies aborted. A separate New York Times report on January 28 characterized the investigation as “prank calls” to Planned Parenthood. Four reports referred to state funding of Planned Parenthood, but did not mention federal resources granted to the organization. Planned Parenthood’s 2008 Annual Report says $349.6 million in taxpayer-funded grants and contracts accounted for more than a third (36 percent) of the organization’s income that year, second only to health center revenue.  Federal funding for Planned Parenthood has increased by 45 percent since 2001-2002, when it  received a reported  $240.9 million from taxpayers. While federal orders mandate that government money not be used directly for abortions, pro-life advocates point out that federal money used to cover non-abortion costs frees up private money to pay for abortions. Favorite Experts Planned Parenthood is by far the most cited pro-abortion group when it comes to national media coverage. In the last six months, 30 broadcast and print reports have quoted Planned Parenthood representatives and another 26 have mentioned the organization. The 56 mentions of Planned Parenthood dwarf other pro-abortion groups, including the National Organization for Women (30) and NARAL Pro-Choice America (15). When abortion was a major focus of health care reform debates, the media turned to Planned Parenthood President Cecile Richards and other affiliated representatives to statements and analysis. When the media celebrated the 50 th  anniversary of “the Pill,” the media commemorated Planned Parenthood’s role in making it possible. A February 26 profile in The Washington Post painted a glowing picture of abortion doctor Carol Ball. The article described a “difficult time” for Ball and other doctors who perform late term abortions in South Dakota. When Planned Parenthood produced an ad in response to Focus on the Family’s pro-life Super Bowl ad, the media praised it. USA Today noted it “defend[ed] abortion rights,” although the Focus on the Family ad did not target abortion “rights.”   The New York Times on January 27 turned to Richards on the increase in teen pregnancy rates, and she used the opportunity bash abstinence education. “This new study makes it crystal clear that abstinence-only sex education for teenagers does not work,” Richards said. In addition to news reports related to Planned Parenthood, newspapers published five letters to the editor from readers mentioning the organization and fives letters to the editor from Planned Parenthood executives. Another seven op-eds and entertainment reviews mentioned Planned Parenthood, as well as 15 death notices, and a couple of comedians’ jokes. All told, the networks and newspapers mentioned Planned Parenthood more than 80 times in the last six months. But when someone noticed a $1.3 billion discrepancy in Planned Parenthood’s handling of federal money – crickets. The Sound of Silence One letter to the editor in the Los Angeles Times February 7 illustrated the effect the media blackout has had on public perceptions of Planned Parenthood. Responding to the media-manufactured controversy over Focus on the Family’s pro-life Super Bowl ad, a reader wrote, “If I had it, I would give millions to Planned Parenthood to advertise on CBS during the Super Bowl.” Well, dear reader, your wish has already come true. You might not know it from reading the Times, but Planned Parenthood already receives more than $350 million every year from you and every other American taxpayer, with no oversight from the “watchdogs” in the media. Like this article? Sign up for “Culture Links,” CMI’s weekly e-mail newsletter, by   clicking  here.

Newspaper Editor Questions Whether Pro-Aborts Are to Blame for Misspelled Pro-Abortion Graffiti

Somewhere between 7 p.m. on June 14 and 7 p.m. on June 15, vandals spray painted graffiti, as seen on the top right photo, on the home of Dubuque, Iowa pro-lifer Allen Troupe. They were most likely incited by a sign in one of the windows of Troupe’s home, as seen on the bottom right photo. Click both photos to enlarge. Troupe filed a police report and anticipated the same level of fair and balanced media coverage one would expect were pro-life graffiti to appear on the home of an abortion proponent – i.e., lots. But not only did the local paper, the finally posted a story about the vandalism on June 23, but catch the headline: Troupe “believes” the graffiti on his home was tied to his abortion opposition, but that may not be true? The story’s 1st sentence reiterated the point: Police are investigating a vandalism case involving a man who believes his house was targeted due to his opposition to Planned Parenthood and abortion. So Troupe could have been in actuality drawing wild conclusions or hallucinating? These journalists are either utterly biased or totally void of common sense and simple intelligence.

Go here to see the original:
Newspaper Editor Questions Whether Pro-Aborts Are to Blame for Misspelled Pro-Abortion Graffiti

The Five-Morning After Pill?

A European contraceptive pill that works as a five-day alternative to the “morning after” pill may be coming to the U.S.‘s shores, but a thorny debate around the drug’s use and its chemical relation to the RU-486 abortion pill may have influence on the FDA’s endorsement. The FDA is staged to examine the risks of the new drug next week, but arguments are already heated as sides debate issues around when life begins and the rights of women to control their own bodies. —JCL The Washington Post: A French drug company is hoping to offer American women something their European counterparts already have: a pill that works long after “the morning after.” The drug, dubbed ella, would be sold as a contraceptive—one that could prevent pregnancy for as many as five days following unprotected sex. But the new drug is a close chemical relative of the abortion pill RU-486, raising the possibility that it could theoretically be used to induce abortion by making the womb inhospitable for an embryo. The controversy sparked by that ambiguity will force a panel of federal advisers scheduled to consider endorsing the drug next week to grapple with a host of thorny issues. The last time the Food and Drug Administration vetted an emergency contraceptive—Plan B, the so-called morning-after pill—the decision was mired in debate over such fundamental questions as when life begins and the distinction between preventing and terminating a pregnancy. Ella is raising many of those same politically charged questions—but more sharply, testing the Obama administration’s pledge to keep ideology from influencing scientific decisions. Read more Related Entries June 9, 2010 NBA Leads Sports in Diversity June 7, 2010 The Christian Fascists Are Growing Stronger

Read more here:
The Five-Morning After Pill?