Tag Archives: afghanistan

Budget 2010: VAT to rise, cigarettes and alcohol unaffected

The government has unveiled the latest budget cuts and called the measures “tough but fair”. The BBC says it's “the biggest package of tax increases and spending cuts in a generation”, so how will this year's budget affect you? Below are some of the changes coming into force. For full details, have a look at the Treasury's website or the BBC. Taxes: From January, VAT will rise to 20%, generating

General Stanley McChrystal Bails on Afghanistan Strategy

Gen. Stanley McChrystal, the top US commander in Afghanistan has been summoned to Washington in the wake of a magazine article that quotes him and aides criticizing senior Obama administration officials and diplomats. Gen Stanley McChrystal has apologized over the article in Rolling Stone. In it, Gen McChrystal is quoted as saying he feels betrayed by US ambassador to Kabul Karl Eikenberry. The general's aides mock Vice-President Joe Biden and say he is “disappointed” with President Barack Obama. Gen McChrystal says he felt “betrayed” by the US Ambassador Karl Eikenberry during the White House debate on troop requests for Afghanistan. Gen McChrystal suggests Mr Eikenberry was using a leaked internal memo that questioned the troop requests as a way to protect himself from future criticism over the deployment. “Here's one that covers his flank for the history books. Now if we fail, they can say, 'I told you so'.” Gen McChrystal also appears to joke in response to a question about the vice-president. “Are you asking about Vice-President Biden?” McChrystal asks. “Who's that?” An aide then says: “Biden? Did you say: Bite Me?” http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/world/us_and_canada/10372558.stm added by: ampersand

Non-threatening dog shot by COWARD Police!

What a F******* Disgrace, poor sack of SH*T, LESS THAN A HUMAN BEING A**HOLE!!!! to shoot a dog because he couldn't handle him?? and because he couldn't wait for the people with expertise????? http://www.machovideo.com/video/Nonthreatening_dog_shot_19170/ added by: KSirys

General Stanley McChrystal apologizes for comments in Rolling Stone magazine

Washington Post coverage at the link, and here is Defense Secretary Gates official statement on McChrystal the profile: “I read with concern the profile piece on Gen. Stanley McChrystal in the upcoming edition of 'Rolling Stone' magazine. I believe that Gen. McChrystal made a significant mistake and exercised poor judgment in this case. We are fighting a war against al Qaeda and its extremist allies, who directly threaten the United States, Afghanistan, and our friends and allies around the world. Going forward, we must pursue this mission with a unity of purpose. Our troops and coalition partners are making extraordinary sacrifices on behalf of our security, and our singular focus must be on supporting them and succeeding in Afghanistan without such distractions. Gen. McChrystal has apologized to me and is similarly reaching out to others named in this article to apologize to them as well. I have recalled Gen. McChrystal to Washington to discuss this in person.” http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2010/06/22/DI20100622017… added by: Incredulous

Dem Leader Hoyer: Middle Class Tax Cuts Aren’t ‘Sacrosanct’; WaPo Buries Story on Page A13

In a recent interview, House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) said that the Bush tax cuts that affect the middle class should not be considered “totally sacrosanct.” The number two Democrat in the House of Representatives “acknowledg[ed] that it would be difficult to reduce long-term deficits without breaking President Obama’s pledge to protect families earning less than $250,000 a year,” reported Lori Montgomery in the June 22 Washington Post. That certainly sounds worthy of front-page placement, especially in the midst of a contentious midterm election year, but Post editors instead parked the 9-paragraph story below the fold on page A13 of the print edition and gave it a snoozer of a headline: “Hoyer: Tax cuts need to be examined.” “Middle-class benefit may not be affordable long-term, he says,” the subheader dryly noted. The online version headline gave a similarly bland headline, “Rep. Steny Hoyer says middle-class tax breaks may not be affordable long-term.” At no point in her article did Montgomery raise the question of whether an increased tax burden would be “affordable” to middle class earners weathering a rough and uncertain economy.

Read the original:
Dem Leader Hoyer: Middle Class Tax Cuts Aren’t ‘Sacrosanct’; WaPo Buries Story on Page A13

Col. Jack Jacobs: Most In Military Will Say McChrystal ‘Was Right’

Contessa Brewer got a lot more than she was likely looking for when she interviewed Col. Jack Jacobs this afternoon about the McChrystal situation.  The MSNBC host wanted to focus on the impropriety of McChrystal publicly airing his criticisms of Pres. Obama and others in the chain of command.   But while the Medal of Honor recipient readily agreed that McChrystal was out of line, and would probably pay with his job, Jacobs also went out of his way—twice—to add an inconvenient truth: that when it comes to the substance of the criticism, most in the military think McChrystal “was right.” CONTESSA BREWER: It’s about the sort of disdain for authority. And that worries me. JACK JACOBS: Well it sure worry you, and I think he’s going to wind up getting fired because of that; at least partially because of that. BREWER: But is his view not only about the President but about Joe Biden, about Jim Jones, the National Security advisor, about Karl Eikenberry [US ambassador to Afghanistan], on and on down the list: Richard Holbrooke — JACOBS: Those views are very widely held , by the way, inside the military and outside the military, about those people. That they’re ineffective, that Jim Jones, the National Security Advisor, does not have an impact on national security policy, that he has very little access. That Holbrooke hasn’t done anything and so on.  Those views are widely held. They’re not just held by McChrystal’s staff for example. Contessa didn’t respond to Jacobs’ startling assertion.  And when a bit later she closed with more concerns about respecting the chain of command, the colonel took a tough parting shot. BREWER: There are hundreds of thousands of enlisted men and women in the military who are taught not to question authority; they don’t go outside their chain of command.  what kind of message does this send to people at the lower levels in the military? JACOBS: Well, it’s not a very one. But let me tell you what’s going to happen.  Gen. McChrystal can’t stay in his position.  He’s probably going to tender his resignation, and it’s probably going to be accepted–or demanded in the first place.  He might stay.  There are certain circumstances in which he might stay.  Likely as not he is going to be gone, and he’s probably going to wind up retiring. And in the end, this is what the rank and file of military establishment is going to say, privately.  They’re going to say: absolutely right: you can’t do this, you can’t countenance your subordinates speak to the press and say that the rest of the chain of command above you are a bunch of knuckleheads. But they’re going to say: you know what?  He was right.

View post:
Col. Jack Jacobs: Most In Military Will Say McChrystal ‘Was Right’

After Only Six Days, Olbermann Kisses and Makes Up with Daily Kos Blog

Keith Olbermann just couldn’t stay mad at the radical leftists at the Daily Kos. Six days after walking away in a huff, the MSNBC host returned to his spot on the blog on Tuesday morning, with the headline “So, uh, this looks like a nice site.” He began: “OK, I’m back.” I’ve always liked to invent backstories behind cliches and one of my oldest ones is the idea that the first guy who said “You can’t see the forest for the trees” was actually running through a forest when he ran head first into a tree and didn’t enjoy the experience. You do tend to swear at the trees, and, if you hit your head hard enough, you might even swear off that particular forest for awhile. Olbermann claimed to be delighted that responses to his “I’m out of here” blog entry brought a wide spectrum of opinion, and that perhaps he had a new thought buried beneath his self-admitted daily pomposity:  It occurs to me, in the full flower of the pomposity that always strikes me at midday, that this might be somewhat metaphorical for progressives and other centrists, particularly relative to criticism of the Administration. I was reminded of this last night when somebody asked me why I wasn’t pounding the President more on Afghanistan, and I linked him the Comment I did last year saying Obama should declare victory and go home. “Sure,” the guy replied, “you’ve been critical of that, once, but you seem to go lightly on them.” And I said, you’re right…other than this stuff about the BP disaster, and the Public Option, and the political strategy on Health Care Reform, and Afghanistan, and not prosecuting torture, and the Kagan nomination, and maybe six dozen complaints about process or tone. I mention this because the last diary was misinterpreted by 99% of the old media and 99.5% of the new media. I didn’t ‘quit Daily Kos because I got criticized for criticizing POTUS.’ I wrote what I wrote because there was a body of us here which assumed any criticism of this administration had to originate in a nefarious and wholly nugatory plan to destroy it. There certainly are such nefarious and wholly nugatory plans, active, this very minute: The most prominent is called the Republican Party (GOBP). Meanwhile, one group of progressives/liberals/Democrats has assumed no such conspiracy theory, demanded no purity test, and taken no instant and farfetched umbrage. These are the individuals known as the Obama Administration. I haven’t been in contact with anybody there since my comments on the President’s speech, but I sure as hell was in contact with them after every single one of the criticisms I mentioned above. Nobody ever called me up to complain. Nobody ever called me up to dissuade. Nobody schmoozed me, and nobody threatened me. They seem to assume it comes with the job. And they correctly assume that if I’m critical of them, they’re entitled to be critical of my criticism. This differs from the previous occupants of the White House in more ways than this site has members and lurkers and trolls combined. You will recall that every criticism of Bush was a plot to destroy America. Criticism of Obama is…democracy. That’s funny. Keith usually suggests criticism of Obama is….racist. Olbermann apologized for his wounded ago, even as he’s accustomed to dishing it out at least as viciously as he takes it:  The show I do and the positions I take are under assault, every day, from every possible direction, and I’m not complaining about it: I can afford the suit of armor. I just get pissed off now and again when I’m busy dodging bazookas and somebody bounces a nine-volt battery off my shiny metal ass claiming I’m actually an agent trying to make dough the easy way. I should have laughed at the ludicrousness of the idea. I didn’t. Sometimes it gets sweaty inside the armor. I’m not given to rash decisions (and when I say “I’m not,” of course I mean, “I am.”)

Go here to read the rest:
After Only Six Days, Olbermann Kisses and Makes Up with Daily Kos Blog

Obama Admin. Considers Keeping Overseas Prison

The Obama administration is considering using Afghanistan's U.S.-run Bagram Air Base prison to indefinitely detain terrorism suspects captured far from a battlefield and who have not been charged with a crime – without any judicial oversight. added by: The_Global_Report

Would-Be bin Laden assassin detained in Pakistan

Apparently, 52 year-old Gary Faulkner decided to head to Afghanistan with a sword, pistol and some night vision gear and assassinate the Taliban's head honcho. He was arrested in the Chitral region of Pakistan on Sunday night. “We initially laughed when he told us that he wanted to kill Osama bin Laden,” said police officer Mumtaz Ahmad Khan. But he said when officers seized the pistol, the sword and night-vision equipment, “our suspicion grew.” added by: Andrew_Douglas

FAA Under Pressure to Open US Skies to Drones

WASHINGTON (AP) – Unmanned aircraft have proved their usefulness and reliability in the war zones of Afghanistan and Iraq. Now the pressure's on to allow them in the skies over the United States. The Federal Aviation Administration has been asked to issue flying rights for a range of pilotless planes to carry out civilian and law-enforcement functions but has been hesitant to act. Officials are worried that they might plow into airliners, cargo planes and corporate jets that zoom around at high altitudes, or helicopters and hot air balloons that fly as low as a few hundred feet off the ground. On top of that, these pilotless aircraft come in a variety of sizes. Some are as big as a small airliner, others the size of a backpack. The tiniest are small enough to fly through a house window. more at link… So, about a year ago I reported on drones in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Somalia and stated that it was only a matter of time before they have them flying our 'friendly' skies, but I was called a “crazy, tin-foil nutter,” but that's ok…I've done the research and knowledge is power. Today, drones are mostly used for blowing women and children to bits by some pimple-faced geek with a PlayStation controller, but don't worry, they don't want to kill you. LOL “Those Who Sacrifice Liberty For Security Deserve Neither.” Benjamin Franklin added by: rodstradamus